Today, I want to talk about a few things tying all of this together at a higher metaphysical level. So we've seen these situations of people sort of glitching out and freaking out on airplanes, and it's almost as if society is getting more and more insane, and it's more than just a physical chemical situation. It's not just the drugs and all that that's getting really bad, but there's something else going on, and I think a lot of people are picking
up on this. I've been watching a lot of clips, a lot of analyzes in the last year about the paranormal, and I know a lot of that stuff is goofy and a lot of stuff facilly, but there's actually seems to be an increase in a lot of these manifestations, a lot of these bizarre phenomenon that are in many ways inexplainable, but doesn't mean there's no explanation.
Just means that it doesn't fit with the current paradigms and models that we have for how we understand what exists, what doesn't exist, what's real, what's not real. And so one reason for that is that modern society is
premised on the idea that really all that exists is physical matter. Right, So when you hear me talk about materialism, I'm not talking about a desire for more and more junk, but really the idea that the only thing that exists in the universe is physical material, cellular, molecular, atomic matter. That's it. Nothing else exists. Your mind is just a brain state, is just great matter. There's not actually a mind. The mind and the brain are the same thing. And so this worldview is in many ways an
operating system. Right. There was a great conversation here and David at the Chateau Ray. David I was getting into this, and he was making a great point that we tend to have an operating system of program that we see the world through and that will really limit and determine us in terms of what we believe exists or doesn't exist, depending on the operating system. So we have if we have a materialist operating system, then everything will be read in
that way. We'll think, oh, that only material things exist, pure matter. So anything that occurs has to have a naturalistic, materialistic explanation. And really this is a post Enlightenment, post Darwinian, post Newtonian view. The weird part about this, though, is that modern physics in many ways in many places, as well as other sciences, actually no longer follows or believes that older model, So both Darwinism and Newtonianism have pretty much been discarded
in modern physics. I'm not a physicist. I'm not trying to argue for one view per se, but I'm just pointing out that the dominant views kind of set the stage or the lens through which we read the world at that time, and then when those views begin to crumble, society has a new perspective, They take on alternate views whatever, and reality begins to be seen and read in a different way. It's kind of like the way that we
read a book. Times we read it, but maybe you read the Bible, or you read a famous piece of literature, Lord of the Rings, I don't know, whatever, Dostoevsky. You read it one time when you were younger, You read it now and it comes alive. You see so much more there. Right. The Bible works this way, where you read a lot more into the text than you did maybe when you were a teenager or whatever. I was reading a book recently. We did a book review
of This Brave New World. I read it ten years ago and I thought I had it all figured out. I read it again recently and I noticed all kinds of things I had never seen before. Of course, the world, I would say it kind of operates in that same way we read reality. It's like a book that we read and we decode it, and the mind functions in a way to decode that reality, that information that comes in.
And like Alex and David I were discussing yesterday, our minds are a tuned, our senses are a tuned to interpret one level of that reality, one dimension of that reality, or I know it's three dimensions, and in time I know, but I'm saying that one level of reality, including those dimensions, is how we see things. But we know in mathematics, even mainline mathematicians and physicists point out that math shows there's higher dimensions, people like
Brian Green or Lisa Randall. Lisa Randall has a book called Warped Passagism. In that book she talks about mathematics, things like quasi crystals that are made. They're used to make non stick pans. The mathematics and the geometry of
those structures shows there's higher dimensions. There's next level stuff going on. So even math, even physics nowadays points to other dimensions, other realities, and some people have theorized that as humans change their perception, we might actually be tapping into those dimensions, those are higher realities, and we might actually be reading reality in a new way. Now, I'm not saying that the mind causes everything to occur, or that everything is a project of the mind.
That's kind of a Carl Young in view. And maybe we could bring Jordan Peterson in and he could talk about Carl Young gold day, Right, Karl get Jung. I'm just kidding. We're not gonna mark Joran Peterson. But he has an insight there, which is that reality is seen at like a book in the ancient and medieval world. Right Peterson makes this Ducor Peterson makes this point, And I think there's something there, because Karl Young is right to say that, Yeah, we do interpret the world and see the world
through a pattern of archetypes. So there's patterns of archetypes that help us structure interp of the world. There is some connection possibly between the human mind and the human soul actually being perhaps the portals or the gateways, so to speak, to the spiritual world. So a lot of people think of like, are there higher dimensions? And you know, is cern tapping into this or something like that. I mean, I don't know, and I don't claim
to know. But one thing that's interesting is in ancient religions, whether they're across the world, whatever they are, animis Potheism, Christianity, all of these ancient religions and world views posit that the real gateway between the physical world and the spiritual world isn't some portal and out and outer space. It's actually the human soul, the mind. The human soul is the portal between this
world and other worlds. So what I'm getting at is it it's it very possible that there is a sense in which as humans change their world view, as they shift away from the paradigm of materialism, Darwinism, Newtonianism and into alternate views, alternate perspectives, they are perhaps even tapping into other dimensions, and they're beginning to read and decode reality in a new way, in a different way, which does read perhaps higher dimensions or spiritual things, spiritual phenomenon.
I'm not saying Bigfoot's real. I'm not saying Nesti in Ogapoco, I don't know, right, I'm not saying that every stupid video or TikTok is actually a demostrat. I don't know that. And a lot of these things obviously are stilly their fate, but a lot of things are occurring right now, and they're getting more and more intense and more and more crazy, which
are unexplainable or paranormal. They're above the normal. The ancient medieval world, metaphysics was not the study of witchcraft or angels and demons per se, angels and demons and these kinds of things that would be under the classification of metaphysics. So you know, now, if you go into a Barnes and Noble or a bookstore or whatever, if you see metaphysics, it's like all witchcraft and alchemy and all that kind of stuff. But really metaphysics is just reality.
It's a study of reality. And we all have different models of reality. And what I'm getting at is just that our models are paradigm. Our system, our worldview is the lens by which we interpret reality. And if we from the outset don't conceive of certain things even being possible or even existing, then we'll never consider the information or the evidence that might suggest those things.
For example, if you think about the way that people who don't question nine to eleven, or they don't question big scale events, or they don't know about false flags, they don't believe that there's even the possibility of a false flag, then their perception is limited in any information that you bring them, say about evidence that nine to eleven was a false flag, or any other seven seven was a false flag, it won't even be within their purview,
it won't even make it into their circle of what's possible. And this idea of the circle or the psyche or the consciousness as a circle which is contained is actually an ancient alchemical and sort of a secret society symbol which demonstrates control. I recently did an interview with a long podcast with doctor James Lindsay and a guy who was an intelligence consultant throughout the post nine to eleven situation
to the Pentagon on Islam. His name is Stephen Coughlin. He does a lot of philosophical analysis, and he was looking at how worldviews work in this way, and he noticed that if you look at the circle as a kind of magic circle, right, and I don't mean literally a magic circle, I just mean as an image of the psyche and how we view what's possible and what's not possible. He says that the mainstream media, as an example, and mainstream education, they give you the circle with which you can work
within, and that's it. So any possible thing outside the circle isn't even considered a valid question. And that's precisely the model for how the mainstream media has controlled the narrative. You can only ask questions within the circle. Everybody knows about the control of two party system that we've been dealing with for so long. That's another easy example of this, Right, do you want coker Pepsi? Well, what about other options or other possibilities? Right, those
aren't even considered valid questions. It's a great philosopher named Eric Vogelan who actually wrote about this. His whole approach to modernity was that scientism and technocracy tell you what questions are allowed to ask from the outs within that circle. And so I'm saying the same way, you can take that and apply it to how we interpret and read reality. You know, I often talk about religious concepts, spiritual concepts, mystical concepts, these kinds of things, and people
think, well, that's impossible, it doesn't exist. Because they're running on a program of naturalism. They're not able to understand or see or consider the possibility that there are bigger explanations. Maybe the natural the physical world is just a piece of the picture, a piece of the puzzle. Maybe there's a lot more going on. Right, And we've been locked into a box which
actually is in brave new world. Right, this circle, this box about you're given a specific, prepackaged worldview by the entire system, whether it's mainstream education, mainstream media, pop culture, toxic garbage, fake pop culture, all of that is giving you a narrow, limited, prepackage system view that will never allow you to ask or go beyond that box or that circle.
Right. It's a very limiting thing, and that's done by design. In fact, a lot of stuff that you hear me talk about when I talk about philosophical topics, you might think, oh, that's a bunch of obscure nerds stuff. Nobody cares about your philosophy. That's it's irrelevant to my daily life. Do you know the top psychological warfare experts, the Tavistock social engineers, the top engineer trainer control people, the controllers in the Brave New World
lingo. Do you know what they study and have study for many years? Worldviews, worldview warfare, Velton schonskriek, the manipulation of perception, right, I think, isn't it? Kissinger has something like the quote something like doesn't matter what's true. What matters is people's perception of the events. So managing
and controlling perception is everything to the system. That's where they study world views, philosophies, ancient philosophies, to give you your own self image, your own self, the story that you have of yourself, your origin, your narrative, changing images of man. Really famous global elite text. It's a white paper from Stanford Stanford Research SRI, the same entity that studied remote viewing
and occultism, satanism for the CIA. SRI all true, all real menusteric goats studying all these esoteric New Age practices First Earth Battalion, that's all real stuff. Who is doing that? Stanford Research, high level academia, social controls, social engineering, all working with Tavistalk, SRI and all of that is the American version of the UK Tavistalk. And they're interested in creating your perception and worldview and controlling it, limiting it so that you can be controlled.
That's where all the tech centsorship comes in, because the part of the tech and all of the screen living that we do is to make sure you're in a feedback loop. What's a loop. It's the same circle. It's the circular economy that you could never get out of because it's a trap. Right. Remember the ancient Hindu symbol of the wheel that you can't that you can't escape this reincarnation wheel. That's the wheel of time and space that's supposed
to entrap you from these people's perspective. Don't go anywhere. This is the option. I guess it's Jay Dyer of Jasonalysis. We're talking about the metaphysical, the mysterious, the unknown, and worldviews and how our worldviews give us the lenses by which we interpret the world. Are they live glasses? So I was thinking about the experience that many people are having of increasing experiences with the demonic right, more and more phenomenal people saying that they're seeing people,
you know, change in appearance, They're seeing weird glitches, manifestations. And my theorizing is that this could be as a result of people moved away from the paradigm of materialism and physicalism and into situations where we're considering the possibility of alternate realities, alternate dimensions. I don't really believe that there's multiverse. I think that there are higher and lower dimensions, and so sometimes people might be
mistaking that or a multiverse. But regardless, this makes sense in the paradigm that is open minded, that is open to understanding the possibility they're being higher and lower dimensions, that there's other spiritual realities beyond just the physical plane. And a lot of people that, for example, are engaging in excessive drug use. There's this phenomenon of people who many of them, not just a few, but many, many people are doing excessive amounts of benadryl, a
lot of teenagers, young people, which I think is ridiculous. I would never recommend anybody do this, but they're having these experiences of seeing this same entity, the Hatman, which I think is probably something obviously demonic A lot of people who have done intense LSD doses and so forth, even groups of people, they'll have a common experience of seeing the same hallucination or manifestation. And again to cite doctor Jordan Peterson in his courses, his lectures, he
actually talks about this as well. He talks about how would we have the same hallucination right going on between people that are in a group taking a drug. I have friends who have had this experience and they've talked about it. Well, that suggests more than the phenomena or the entity being purely chemical reactions in the brain. They might be chemical reactions in the brain, but they all also be tapping into higher realities, lower realities, other dimensions, held
dimensions, hell world, hellscape. I don't know, but I'm saying that that's very possible. And a lot of people's stories overlap and have commonalities likewise. For example, doctor Peterson sites the work of the famous comparative religion scholar Markaia Eliada and Eliata had analysis of the commonalities amongst shamanic traditions. So it doesn't matter where you are in the world, whether you have Mongolia or South America or wherever, the shamanic experience. I'm not saying bea shaman. I'm
just saying that the patterns of the shamanic experience are the same. They have the same structures and cycles. For example, the shaman does something to cause the ultra state of consciousness, He goes into the spiritual realm. He is then dismembered by the gods, the deities, whatever he might be consumed or
destroyed, and then he has put back together, he has reassembled. And then the shaman comes back from the trip and he's now enlightened, or he's had his third eye, whatever however you want to he has a spirit guide. Now this occurs in a consistent pattern across the world. Why would that be if, for example, all of these religious systems were completely human constructs.
The modern post Darwinian Enlightenment account the religions gradually begins to say, well, they're all just sort of social constructs, right, We're all just making this up as we go. It doesn't really have any ancient medieval connection, or there's no truth really behind it. These are just human creations, right,
like LARPing, fan fiction for the social order or something. But why on how would it be possible that even amongst the polytheists, the shamans, the animus, the shamanic figure, that archetype, why would they have the exact same ritual experience across the world, and it can't just be because they have some common root, because after several generations there would be no connection between
these people. They wouldn't know about a common root. Well, another possibility which even Aldous Huxley hits on in the Door's Perception, which we cover here in the fourth Hour a couple of months ago. I'll just actually who's himself as a big proponent of doing all these things right. He sees this as tapping into other realities, other spiritual worlds, other mental worlds. He doesn't know how to explain it, but he admits that that's where the data seems
to go. You see, And I'm saying that comparative religion says the same types of things when it comes to explaining these phenomenon. I'm not saying that every world religion and every claim of superstition is true, but I'm saying that you can have true and false in a system, right, in a worldview.
So if we find commonalities amongst all the world religions when it comes to the demonic, when it comes to these manifestations, then perhaps religion has something to say philosophically about what those things are, what those manifestations are, and why is it for example, that we see a lot more demonic possession or these manifestations in societies that are called consider primitive or third world or whatever, lot more superstition so called. And well, they have a paradigm a worldview
where they see things in a religious context. Everything is alive, everything is part of the divine spirit. Right, so speaking of like animistic religions, right, So for them, their reality, their worldview is structured in that way. They have a different set of glasses that they read the world through. And so it's not surprising that we would see more and more manifestations of these kinds of things in those cultures because they see that as fundamental to reality.
In modern Western materialist society, we may not have seen a lot of that before because we read reality in a different way, and so we limited the possibilities of what does and doesn't exist good and evil. Right now,
I'm saying that's its own kind of delusion. Right If you read Screwtaple Letters, for examples, a great book where the demon Screwtape is messing with a guy and trying to convince them of different different things like atheism, and atheism is a very powerful demand presence and spirit in sort of the cs lewis a theology there spirituality because it lulls man into a kind of a delusion that he's
got it all figured out, he's got a grand narrative. But then sometimes reality breaks in, especially crises when we have a lot of abundance and luxury and we have really decadent societies. When atheism sets in, usually that leads to the collapse of that society. Even historians and philosophers of history like Spangler, right, Spangler has noted the cycle of civilizations and then when they kind of get to this atheist phase, this is where they start to have the
collapse, the breakdown because there's no longer meaning. Meaning breaks down. When meeting breaks down, society breaks down. And again Tavistock studied Spangler. Keep that in mind. Now, Spangler wasn't being nefarious. He was just kind of a weird, eccentric historian philosopher of history. But Tavistock studied Spangler to weaponize his philosophy and his system to figure out how could we actually collapse the
existing system to bring in our new system. And what I'm getting at is that part of the reason that we're seeing and more and more of these weird manifestations and things being so crazy and so it's so psychotic. Is that we're literally sort of seeing the next level of reality, the next dimension where the demonic is kind of like stepping over into are the veil is stinning. Gallex
said that yesterday, right exactly. That's what That's what I think is going on, partly because of the openness that human beings have to more and more spiritual realities and possibilities which are manifesting, oftentimes in a demonic way. I think a lot of these manifestations of what people are seeing there it's it's evil, but it's not all that. There are good spirits, good forces as well. There's a good God, so just as much as there are these
evil manifestations, that will also be good. But as society gets more and more wicked and corrupt, I think we're going to see more and more evil manifestation, more wicked manifestations, more bizarre, strange, and so forth.
It's only going to get crazier and weirder from here on out. A lot of that has to do again with not just having an alternative perspective or being open to new things, but actually having a good perspective, actually having a good worldview, not any old worldview, but a solid, coherent, meaningful
worldview. Right. And it might not seem related to this, but I was thinking about the collapse in France and all the riots and all that, and it was in two thousand and eight UK Ministry of Defense document paper alex has covered for many years, and it was I think it was it was
think it was two thousand and eight. I think it's in the Guardian or the Telegraph, and it's talking about how the future, what we would see in the next several years, the future will be a society of chaos, mobs, collapse, etc. And the rise of another type of Marxism, it says, which I think is what we have with all the woke social dustice. So basically that two eight a Ministry of Defense document predicted everything that were happening, this happening right now, and the mobs and the riots and
the chaos is also part of that dialectic part of that system. A lot of people out there are literally becoming like NPC sort of zombie controlled bought people, right, They're becoming more and more like that, and they're part of that circle of like the defined controlled system, and so they're they're set against a faux opponent, right of you know, evil crackers and honky people like the white people are the bad people that you know, they have to destroy
to have their freedom, to have their liberty or whatever. And they really believe this because they've been programmed with this narrative. So they read reality in this way with this weird worldview where they're completely programmed. It's an operating system. And you know, they see the demonic or the evil as people who are heterosexual Christian people, right, that's the worst person in the world to them, because they're given the program with an evil paradigm, an evil worldview.
But these worldviews always have to have some notion of good and evil, of the good and what's not the good? Right, So it's amazing that you can tool an engineer and create worldview so easily and export them and put them in people's minds like a program. And I don't want to overuse that analogy because I don't think we're just computers, but it's a great analogy. Right, We run on various programs, and if you're programming is a materialist
naturalist worldview, or if you're programming is the world social justice worldview. That's why everything operates more like a cult. Everybody's worldview actually is some kind of a religious worldview, even if they're irreligious. Scientism and irreligious worldviews are actually a religious commitment because they're grounded on they're founded on things that are not fundamentally openly religious, but are faith based. For example, the scientific method can't
prove the scientific method. Scientific method can't prove the law of induction, principle of uniformitarianism and nature. Scientific method can't prove the past. I mean, there's all kinds of metaphysical things that the scientific medod can't prove, which shows that it's limited. But if it's exalted to be the give all, the be all, end all, what exists, one doesn't exist. If it's taken out of its proper context. Now it becomes like a religious thing.
It's like a sort of pseudo good. And now the priest class of the pop quote science people, what I vould you say, I end a science, put your mask on, take it off if it works. But it doesn't work, but also it works because I'm the science interesting it's acting like a religion. Trust the science faith based. So we all have these operating systems, and the question is who has the better or worse operating system?
Right, I mean, nobody's gonna be perfect, so but we all we want to try to aim for the one that's the best, that's the truest, that makes the most sense, that's attuned to the good. Right. This is what Plato talked about. And I was listening to Guests or Day Show and David I was talking about this idea of you know that we only hone in on like a certain bandwidth of the light spectrum, right, and that that's the limited amount of what we can see. I think that's true.
Think there's an insight there, because what that means is that there's all kinds of things going on in higher dimensions, other realities and so forth, that we don't really understand or know about. But just because we don't understand or know about it doesn't mean it doesn't exist, doesn't mean that it doesn't
relate to our reality. Just because I can't classify and scientifically explain all of the archetypes doesn't mean that there aren't comparative religious archetypes that are obviously in some sense real. So just because it can explain something or exhaustively define it doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. That would be a fallacy. But he makes this point that, well, we only see a little bit of the color
spectrum, so we don't really know what's going on beyond that. Things are really wild and complex right in these higher dimensions or spiritual worlds or whatever. I think that's true, and believe it or not, there's a Plato a Platonic dialogue called the Fiato, and there's this weird thing. I bring this up because the day before David I did his discussion yesterday, I was having
a conversation with a professor. And this is a professor who did his focus work on Plato and Plato's works, and I said, well, you know, I defer to you. You're a professor. I said, I've always wondered what's going on in Plato's Fiato because there's this, you know, classic famous dialogue, and then at the end, Socrates kind of goes off into this weird discussion of higher dimensions and realities that we don't know are understanding those
higher dimensions, and even talks about colors that we've never seen. He says, there are colors that exists outside of our color spectrum. How would Socrates know that? I mean, we're talking about you know, two thousand and five hundred years ago in Greece. Isn't that wild? So there's other things too, and Plato's Tomas, which is his mythology of the origin of the universe. There's discussions of the fundamental structures of reality being geometric, the Platonic
solids. How would platot know that that reality? And you get you know, you get really small into your microscope and down to the you know, subatomic or whatever, you start to see geometric forms. This is one of the things that Wolfgang Polly argues is that when you get down to this you know, quantum level whatever that is where whatever's going on there, it has structure and form. And it wouldn't be that way if it was all pure chaos, you see, if there was no order or telos of purpose or
design in the world. So not only is reality designed, it's highly designed and structured such that everything is meaningful, every interaction is providential, is a synchronicity, so to speak. He used the union and whatnot terminology and the
mystical terminology, so it's the same idea what providence is right. And so the reason I say all that is that, Okay, so we've got the elitist worldview, which has been this sort of Darwinian materialist view that they've programmed everybody to have from the top of the role society all the way down for the last several centuries. And now what's happening is that people are moving into all kinds of other worldviews, but a lot of sort of weird esoteric stuff,
witchcraft new agy stuff. And this is both good and bad. I mean, it's good in the sense that people are moving away from the materials paradigm, but it's bad in the sense that people are now moving into something that might be even worse from the vantage point of what might man of the craziness the chaos. Right, So if we revert to kind of a brutalism and a paganism, society loses its ordering structure, it's logos structure. Logos
means reason. In the Bible. Jesus is called the logos in John one because he's the personification of the divine He is the manifestation of the divine reason. And so John and the Gospel John is utilizing that archetype, that pattern from Greek philosophy and saying that what the Greeks are searching for and grasping for,
it's really in this person of the logos, this divine person. And so what that is an ordering structure a principle, right, It gives the religion, the society the structure, this kind of patriarchal model and the struct the archetype of the patriarch of the logos. It is order, it is structure. It is the father figure, right, who orders his house. And so if you think of society organized like a household or even like a man like Plato says, right, there's got to be the reasoning faculty kind
of governing things. I don't agree with everything Plato says in the Republic, but that's one thing he says that I think is true. And one of the reasons that we've had this archetypal worldview warfare going on for so long against the patriarchy is so that society can be changed. In fact, some of these new ag esoteric authors, the people like Marylyn Ferguson and the Sri people and Friedolf Copper, they actually talk about the need to destroy the archetype of
a strong man or the patriarch or the father figure. And they understand that culture is this kind of memetic archetypal warfare, meme magic type stuff or whatever, right, And that's symbolism and cartoons, symbolism and commercials, symbolism, movies and TV shows. All of that is part of this Velton Shaun's creek, this worldview warfare of attacking and going after archetypes. The father archetype was very crucial to be destroyed. And this happened has been the process of having
been going after this notion for a long time. It's not just third wave feminism. This goes back to even in the French Revolution, you had a lot of weirdos who were saying that to have a revolution in society, we'd have to destroy the distinction between male and female. Because ordered societies typically have a logost patriarchal principle. You have to destroy that as well as destroying the mother archetype to completely destroy and reorganize society. And that is a weapon,
and it is done intentionally, and they study this. This is what I'm trying to tell you. Military experts, warfare experts, psychological warfare experts. They study worldview warfare because, as we all know, what is son Zeus say right, basically that if you really want to win the war, it's winning the mind. It's not actually the battlefield. The battlefield is secondary to the mind war. The mind war is for the from the vantage point of
the league. What Kissinger said, right, it was controlled the perception. It doesn't matter what the event is. Control of perception of the event. That's all that matters. Controlling perception of everything in the circle, the magic circle of the controllers. And well, it's true that you can step out of that circle and you can start to get into other models of reality. Something that just just because you said of the circle doesn't mean it's necessarily good.
You might step into something bad or worse. Right, So maybe, oh, I mean I'm gonna be in a witchcraft now, Oh you know I'm a millennial. I'm I'm a witch now because you know, science is faking gay or something. I don't know what the reason. But that's not any better is when I say all of these systems are predicated on lies, deception, programming, and basically anything that fits into the technocratic global paradigm.
Any religions that don't fit that either are discarded or worldviews or have to be modified. That's why the world religion that they're really pushing and trying to bring forth and manifest that world religion has to get rid of or change or cut off anything in the other religions. It's not amiable due technocracy. So really the world religions that they're trying to create and push, the fake one. It's just a tool of the technocratic elite. I was reading a book that
I recommend is really good on this stuff. And now you might think, well, this is dated, it's nineteen seventynine. Wy wouldn't want read a boo from nineteen seventy nine. Well you've heard, I'm sure Alex talk about books about Gary Allen and all these kind of classics. Well there's another one of these that a lot of people have overlooked, which is from Professor Anthony Sutton that he wrote with the technocratic expert Patrick Wood. It's called Trilaterals over
Washington by Patrick Wood and Professor of Sutton. And the reason this is good is that everything that we see, for example, the Trilateral Commission in nineteen seventy nine planning has come to pass, and why would we care too late?
No, So if we look back to these global institutions and what they said they wanted to do by where we are now, if that has come to pass, then doesn't it stand to reason that the same global institutions are probably telling us now what they're going to do in the next ten twenty years. Absolutely, it's the same people at wf DA, same people that go to Builderberg, same people to go to the Trilateral Commissions. It's all the same people. Okay, So these are just names for steering committees, which
are made up of people. The people are who matter, and the people are the ones that go to all the same groups. Now, probably a lot of the nineteen seventy nine Trilateral Commission people have passed away. David Rockefeller obviously was a big player there. Well, he's no longer with us. George Soros, right, these kinds of people. But it's not just George Soros. It sort of begins. This's that's what Daniel Estlan was saying in a great interview that Alex did this week. Right, it's not it doesn't
begin with George Morton. No, this is an old plan of tearing down borders, tearing down economic tariffs and all of that to have totally open free trade that then puts in place the global system. And Sutton and would note that for example, might think, oh, China's the enemy. China's the enemy. I mean, it's an intentionally created dialectical foil. That's the point. He says. They were writing this in nineteen seventy nine about the rises
of China, the policy of the normalization of relations with communist China. Remember, America's supposed to be this capitalist country, right scaboloist nation versus the communists of the Soviets. This was implemented as a program to build up China technologically into a superpower. It was done by Sabina Brazinski under David Rockefeller, and as the nineteen seventy nine or seventy eight Anthony Sutton Trilateral Report said, it
was implemented as Zbig's baby. More than anyone else. Ze Big ninety nine percent of the work for Rockefeller in terms of China. And why do I say that, Because that's a circle, that's a magic circle that everybody was supposed to Well, you choose America or China. The global elites, they're
the ones that are above American took They're the ones that promoted China. And so the chaos that we see right this collapsing in France and all that all that chaos, all that crazy, and all these manifestations of madness that we're seeing are only going to increase. It's only going to get crazier. And you need to supports at or store, get those products and keep the show going. And Jason Alyss dot com