Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for joining me today on Jay Sleigh USA. I'm so glad you're here. We have a very special show for you today, very special guest, Jaydyer, somebody had been following for a while at a distance, and just he's going to be the perfect guy, I think, to cover the material that so badly needs to be
covered today. And this is a subject being Epstein, the Epstein Files, and the Christian conscience about it, as well as the Christian conundrum, especially with the Christian Zionist crowd. You know, what are we seeing from them? What are they doing and why so? Jay Dyer is a YouTuber, a Christian apologist, author, and public debater who's known for
his sharp analysis and fearless engagement with controversial topics. He is a former I believe he's a former Protestant who converted to Orthodoxy, and he brings a deep theological, historical, and philosophical lens to everything he does. He's been featured on many major platforms and is respected for his debating ability and research skills. I discovered Jay seeing him debate this weird way to discover him. He was debating the Misfit Patriot all right, And this was a guy who
just I think he just badly wanted attention. But he was coming out strong with all the major Zionist talking points. Even though he wasn't really good at the hasbara, he still did it strongly. So he was being featured on like Rabbis shows and these Christian Zionists would you have him on their shows? And Jay basically put him to bed pretty quickly. I actually think that this guy did not complete the interview if I remember, or the debate.
So what was clear to me though that was Jay was not just a guy who argues well or debates well. He studies, He knows the background to things that he's talking about, so there's some credibility and substance there. So we could probably come on and talk about a whole
lot of topics that affect the Christian world. But based on where we're at right now with this whole Epstein thing, I thought, who better to come on my show and do a deep dive into the Epstein files and the reaction to it, especially among the Christian world, than Jay Dyer. So with that, Jay, thanks again for coming on. Glad to have you.
Thanks Jeremy, Glad to be with you. Do I need to repeat what we I don't mind you don't know not at all.
Don't worry about it a bit. I think what you were giving was a background and you said this is actually the way that it's worked ever since Old Testament days. You go and yeah, and we will. I'm sure cover it, and you know as we talk here, but let's start with this, Jay, I want to start with you because I really have not had this conversation with you. Can you give us the high level background of your journey from I think you were an Evangelical Protestant to Orthodoxy.
And I'll say I have people in my feed all the time saying, Jeremy, will you please try your local Orthodox church, you know, because they know the problem I'm having. Really, So anyway, fire away, man.
Yeah.
I was raised Baptist, come from a military family, so my family moved a lot when I was young, and we ended up in California for a while San Diego, my dad was in the military.
Then we moved back to Tennessee and I went to was.
Originally going to go to Bible College when I graduated high school, so I went to some Baptist schools for a while and ended up kind of questioning a lot of the Baptist stuff because I was really into church history and reading about the formation of the Biblical can
and how it came together. And I was really young, that was in my young my early twenties, maybe twenty twenty one, when I was doing a lot of that reading, and I bought the Church Father set here that you see behind me, so that that kind of got me all focused on early Church and the Batristic era, and I had a lot of questions. This is back in
like twentyd and one, two and three. There weren't a lot of a whole lot of internet resources on this stuff back at that time, so I ended up kind of in the Catholic Protestant debate world, not myself debating, yet just kind of consuming a lot of that and
trying to work through that content. I spent a little bit of time at a evangelical seminary, and while I was in the midst of those classes and doing a lot of reading, I just couldn't reconcile the biblical case for tradition and the Biblical canon with what I had been assuming was just sort of the de facto given position of solo scripture and whatnot. So long story short, that read me. That led me into a long period
throughout my twenties of being a Roman Catholic. So all of my twenties I was a traditional Catholic, went to the Latin Mass, got very into Thomas Aquinas and Catholic apologetics. But I was also at the same time really interested in philosophy. Ended up leaving Baptist Bible College and I went in seminary and I went to a just four year standard state university and I did my undergraduate in philosophy in history, and then did grad work in English and.
Philosophy that cognate discipline there.
Long story short, So I was studying film, I was studying philosophy, I was studying semiotics and symbolism and film, and I was doing grad work on Ian Fleming at the same time as being really interested in theology and the Bible and apologetics. And I would say around twenty I was interested in Orthodoxy about two thousand and seven and eight and started reading the Eastern Church Fathers, reading a lot on Orthodox theology, but I held off and
it didn't end up becoming Orthodox until about twenty sixteen. Seventeen, I was getting more serious about it, and then I think I came in about twenty eighteen. So I've been orthodox in twenty eighteen. But I think the weird part is a lot of people on the internet. I'm not speaking about you, just in general, like people usually think of people as like doing one thing.
You know, he's the guy that does the debates.
Actually we were doing on my channel, my sphere, we were doing a lot of movie film stuff. Way before I even had the idea to do a debate. That just kind of happened accidentally. Somebody said, hey, would you debate this atheist guy, and then that led to another atheist debate, and then so I said, hey, will you debate this Muslim guy? And then that led to a bunch of Muslim debates, and then that just snowballed on its own. But we were doing a lot of film analysis.
For example. I just thought this was funny.
I was writing film analysis stuff that was coinciding with my grad work.
And so in twenty sixteen I.
Published a book, Essoty Hollywood, and I just want to note that in the first chapter I talked about the rothchilds and sex cults and networks and espionage. I talked about how films were actually telling us this, and I got.
A lot of flak from that.
What year was that, Jay, Well, the essay was written in twenty fourteen or fifteen, and then the book was published in twenty sixteen. So, but the first book I read on ritual stuff was actually two thousand and four, and it was William Kennedy's It was a really rare text.
Now you can't really find it.
William Kennedy's book Lucifer's Lodge that came out in two thousand and fourth, the first journalistic work on the history of the PDP skin on the Roman Catholic world and the abuse going on there. So anyway, I've been into this kind of stuff for a long time. But you mentioned this journey. You know, for me it wasn't just
theological it was also the geopolitical conspiracy world too. I kind of came out of the Christian Zionist stuff back even when I was a Protestant, so at Baptist Bible College and then at the seminary I was at, I was under the influence of a lot of Calvinists and a lot of people like Greg Bonnson, and they had already written some stuff back in the late nineties that I was reading in the early two thousands that kind
of got me out of the evangelical dispensational perspective. So I got into you know, post millennial type theology in the early two thousands, reading David Chilton and Onsen and Rush June and all those guys Ken Gentry, and then I kind of, you know, that partially transitioned to me. Not it wasn't just eschatology, but that some of that theology is kind of what propelled me as well to you know, leave Christian Zionism and dispensationalism and all that which I.
Was raised with.
So but I also, you know, was starting to realize that there's stuff going on in the geopolitical realm, which at that time I just thought it was conspiracy stuff. I was watching Alex Jones' and stuff back in two thousand and two or three. It was the first time I saw some of his material, and he was talking about scull and Bones and Mahemian grove and so what
is this? And I remember I heard about Anthony Sutton had a book on skull and Bones, and I bought that book and then I watched Alex's documentaries and got really heavy into the conspiracy world. And then I started realizing,
I think I was in a unique position. And I'll shut up here in a second because I don't want to bore you, But I was in a unique position because I think a lot of people, you know, when they get into this kind of stuff, they're they're getting into it through the Internet, and as was I. But this was back in the early two thousands, and I was also studying this stuff, right, So I was taking philosophy classes, I was taking film classes, and I started
noticing that there's a real parallel between what I was seeing in the conspiracy world on the Internet and what I was seeing in movies. And I've always been early into the film and always been a film buff, and so yeah, I just started focusing on the relationship between Hollywood and intelligence agencies, between cults and Hollywood and cults
and intelligence agencies. And I just kept finding these overlaps, and certain books would come my way, and academic journals and things, and oh yeah, of course this director, this Hollywood person, they worked for the CIA, they worked for the OSS, they were you know, confidential informats and you would find these details about a list actors and producers and people that how come I never heard this that this you know person was a spy in real life
and so that was its own rabbit hole and so forth.
So anyway, long story short, I eventually put it into a book and then you know, that led to hosting for Alex for the last six years on most Fridays, so I've been able to do that, and then, you know, so it's it's sort of like a bunch of separate things that we do, writing for Sam Hide, doing comedy, that kind of stuff, but they all kind of overlap because you know, in the Internet world, all of these seemingly crazy areas, they all kind of like merge together
in one, one infinite scrolling feed of insanity. So yeah, anyway, yeah, that's that's how I got to where we are now, you know, debates, comedy, writing the books on movies, all that kind of stuff.
Yeah, you know, it's interesting people that spend the years that it takes, and I would say, I'm I've spent years now researching. We all come at this from our own angles. But if there's one true story that is being told, and there's the there's if there is objective truth, then when we detach from the stories we were told which made sense to us when we weren't smart enough to ask the questions. Okay, then you detach, and then you feel like A girl called me this morning and
she was she's in this. She's like, I feel like I'm in a dizzy bat race. I feel like I've detached from all these people that I thought because she worked heavy I'll tell you exactly what it was. She worked in the heavy pro life industry with Lyla Rose and did all these things with these various Catholic five oh one c threes. But these people won't touch Epstein. They won't touch you know, the genocide and Gaza, the amount of kids that have died over there. They won't
touch it. And it's driving her insane. And she's like, I now don't know what to do. I don't know what to believe other than She's like, I believe in Jesus, but I feel so disoriented because all the leaders that I'm supposed to trust and respect have gone silent on the biggest issue of our times. And I was like, tell me about it, you know, But what I was going to say is people detached, they get dizzy. Then they start finding some of these threads that make sense.
And it's a long process, but eventually you come to a place where when you figure out what's going on and who's pulling the levers of power, it starts to make a whole lot of sense again. And so I just want to encourage the people watching, like, Man, I'm confused.
If you stick around and you really care about the truth, and you tell me, Jay, if you agree with this, if you really care and you you are seeking God and seeking truth, you were going to come back to a firm foundation where life and the stories around us make coherent sense. That's that's what I believe.
What do you think, Jay, Yeah, you know the existence of this extreme form of evil, you know, in all in all capacities, pretty much everything that you could think of as the most evil.
I mean, I think this kind of triggers a lot of people to also realize that, well, if there's this much evil, then there probably is a reality to the good. And I don't I don't mean that in some kind of weird gnostic way. I'm just I'm just saying that I think that this is what happens to a lot of people and see so many comments and people saying, man, if this kind of evil stuff is real and this is what's going on, then there's.
Got to be a God.
There's got to be spiritual good and not just spiritual evil. So yeah, you know, in regard to the Roman Catholic Church, you know, that's a world that I was in for you know, about a decade, and I know it.
I know it very well. It's been many years since I was in that world.
But you know, since leaving and seeing it, you know, I don't hate Catholics. I think because I do a lot of debates with the Roman Catholics, people think that I hate them. I'm opposed to the people more so. The corruption is from the institution, from the top down.
And uh. And it's not just a matter.
Of espionage and you know, compromising the Vatican at a geopolitical level to promote you know, UNESCO or Davos Agenda. It's it's more than that. It's also a spiritual corruption. It's a it's a networking infiltration that goes back to the Middle Ages, particularly in the eleventh century when you have what's called the Grigorian Reforms and during that period of the papacy took on a new approach to being
a geopolitical world power. Prior to that, most of the churches, even though some of the patriarchates and the important bishoprics of the Church in the first Milameium they had a lot of power, there were specific canons in Chalcedon and other ecumenical councils that forbade the Church from taking on
a civil state role. And what the Roman Church did after the formation of the papal States, et cetera, was to claim for itself more and more political power, until eventually in the eleventh century you have documents like the Tatus pape under Pope Gregory, and then you have later on Unum sanctam under Pope urban In the thirteen hundred and thirteen eighty two, I think eleventh century to thirteen eighty two, you get this rise in the papacy again
just focusing more so on geopolitical stuff, standing armies. If you're not accepting what's called the temporal supremacy of the Roman bishop, then you're no longer able to be saved. And I think that was a key moment for the departure from the Orthodox perspective. That's that century of eleven hundreds to the thirteen hundreds. That's really the key point when Rome deviated from what the Church of the first thousand years East and West agreed upon.
And I when you say that, am I understanding this correctly? You're saying that was the moment where the Vatican said, basically, the Pope's word is equivalent to God's word.
Yeah, Dick toddispape has this phrase in it, which now is admitted even by the Vatican to be a forgery, even though it's still in some of their canon law. No one judges the First Sea, so no one can a judge or criticize or come against the First Sea because he's supreme in all matters. So basically it sets the groundwork for the autocratic view of the papacy, which then gets confirmed at Vatican One, which happened in the
late eighteen hundreds. That was one of their four Vatican two in the nineteen sixties, the last Roman Catholic Dogmatic Council was Vatican one, which confirmed the doctrine of in foul ability and indefectibility of the Roman bishop. So yes,
eventually that culminates. You could say in that perspective, and then all of that sets the stage for Vatican Two in the nineteen sixties, which ironically there was a I think his name is Gregory Baum was the author of the document called Nostrette, which is the decree on Acumenism that's part of the Vatican two documents, and it specifically states that Roman Catholics, Muslims, Jews, even Hindus, we all kind of worship the same God and we can now
have these sort of ecumenical gatherings and practices where we pray together because it's all the same generic deity that was at once a spiritual and a geopolitical maneuvering to turn the Roman Catholic Church into ant into a form of soft power. So it's extending the American attitude during the Cold War. This is a declassified document called the Doctrinal Warfare Program. C. D. Jackson was one of the people that head that up, and they recruited John Courtney Murray to.
Be kind of their representative and their attache.
So Gregory Baum who wrote No Sar Tati, which completely changed the Romancolic Church's perspective on the Jews, which previously had a very negative sort of antithesis position to Judaism or beining Judaism. Now that completely flipped into the opposite to where we're all or sort of on the same path, the same journey. I think Francis a few years ago created the Abu Dhabi Faith Center, which is Mustims, Christians and Jews all worshiping together.
Isn't it specifically Catholics?
What's that?
Isn't it specifically Catholics though, like Muslims, Catholics and Jews.
Well, the yeah, I mean the language of Vatican two kind of says both, because it'll say Catholics, Muslims, and Jews and Hindus is all the same God. But then in other places they'll say all Christians all share in the same The whole thing is really just to catch to cast this really broad, watered down net which denies John fourteen six. You know, Jesus is on the way that you're in the life. No one comes to Father, but they're me. Well, now all the other religions can
also be pathways to God. In fact, Francis even said this a few years ago. I eclipped it, got a lot of views on that clip. Before he passed away, he was affirming that what Vatican two means is that you can be saved in any religion, right, and this is going to denial of the fundamentals of Christian theology and the tradition of the Church. So even I mean, nobody in the first thousand years of Chritianity taught anything like that. So these are really clear indicators of just
specifically where the Roman Catholic Church went off. But separate from that, the reason I'm bringing in people like Gregory Baum is that he was explicitly working, at the best of Jewish interests to change the Roman Catholic Church's attitude and make it more of an a humanist approach, a syncrotist type of approach. And that's why you see the Roman Catholic Church being so different than it was even in the nineteen forties and fifties, almost night and day.
But there's a geopolitical motivation behind that. Gregory Baum was was he was. He was a gay Jewish man who changed the theology of the Vatican explicitly.
This is admitted.
I need I need to read on that guy. That that's that's important.
That's uh. Yeah.
He was then deproocked and then left the priesthood because he had done it, he had completed his mission. So but that's within the Roman Catholic world. I mean you get similar types of things within evangelicalism, where you have the promotion of the Schofield Study Bible, of course, which promoted the idea that the present day nation state of Israel, which was oddly enough a creation of atheistic sort of Hegel influenced UH Zionists like Moses Has and he invites
them and Theodore Hertzel. I mean, I've got Moses Has's books up here. So he explicitly says we're going to use Freemasonry UH as a way to teach a new religion. He says, going to change Christianity. We're going to move these religions into focusing world religion on Tel Aviv. So Moses hes was very explicit about it. It's not totally atheistic, it's not really theistic. It's more of a political position
that uses a generic theism for political means. And they were very explicit about how they had convinced in the eighteen sixties the Rothchilds to support this venture. And I have the Rodchell's biography and in the biography they talk about going in and sort of buying up the Holy Land and places and sites in the Holy Land from the Turkish sultans who had previously had control of that area.
Now people will.
Say, well, political Zionism doesn't come on the scene until you know, the early nineteen hundreds. Yeah, but it was formulated in the eighteen fifties and sixties right by people like Moses Has.
In fact, Moses Has says that he brags about.
How, you know, early on and how he had been meeting with the Rothchild brothers in the eighteen sixties to plan a new homeland for the Jews, and other places were discussed as well. They talked about New Zealand, they talked about Austria, they talked about other places to create
a homeland. But it was ultimately at the behest of the Rothchilds to brag about the Balfour Decoration being one of the ways which prepared the way for the eventual nineteen forty eight what is it recognition to the nation state of Israel, which only happened because of World War Two. So it's interesting that even tiny mustache man fits into that as a justification for the nation state of Israel and all the evangelicals in America are duped then into thinking that.
Not to a fulfillment of prophecy, we got to support the atheist, socialist kipliz nation state of Israel.
It's a fulfillment of prophecy. Now, it's not the fulfillment of prophecy. Is the Church is the Kingdom of God. Jesus said, the Kingdom of God is among you, it's within you. He said he would bring the kingdom. He says to the apostles that they will be princes and judges of the Kingdom. That means that the kingdom is established at the first event, not at the end of the Second Advent. Now it comes to full fruition, we
would say at the second Coming. But all of that rapture dispensational theology is a psyop It's all a very late invention by John Nelson Darby, guy who was a schismatic of the Anglican Church, created his own cult, his own group, and they came up with this prophecy theory that then spread to America via Oxford Press publishing the Scofield Study Bible. So when you get into the history
of all that and you understand the geopolitical motivations. It makes perfect sense why that was pushed in America prior to nineteen seventeen in the Balper Declaration, Like, yeah, it was clearly by design to get American evangelicals, especially to support the geopolitical designs of what quickly calls the atlanticis establishment.
You know, it's it's interesting. I was always taught when I studied Christian apologetics that I thought it was a deep level. It was probably, you know, pretty pedestrian level. But yeah, I was reading all the you know, the Rabbi Zacharias books for Christian apologetics or John Lennox or whatever, you know, and this while I'm traveling as a ballplayer. So I thought I was doing pretty good, you know, and maybe I was. But the key phrase was always
the truth is not afraid of being questioned. The truth is not afraid of being questioned. You know, we could handle it. Ask us your questions. But it was within a certain sphere. And now looking back, it's like, you know, there were so many things they never talked about. I'll
give a few examples right here. You mentioned even though I was trained under the wing of the fourth largest this by the Jerusalem Post, the fourth largest Christian Zionist pastor in America is Alan Jackson out of Murphy's Brough, Tennessee. And he pulled me under his wing as when I was a young, you know, college athlete during an off season. It was right after on the heels of nine to eleven.
We're at a cracker barrel. He broke out a map of the Middle East, and Israel was in blue and all those other big bad bullies were in red, and he's like, look at this miracle. Look, you know, just to they exist even one day, it's a miracle every day.
Now.
I didn't know we were giving them billions and billions of dollars a year of support. I didn't know what apac was. I didn't know the word Christian Zionism. I didn't know the word Zionism. I didn't know the word dispensationalism. I never heard of Schofield, I never heard of Darby. Yet I became, over a period of ten years, the biggest Christian Zionist that I knew. I mean, I was ready to blow all those other countries off the map because I thought, well, they're just leading their kids right
to Hell. Anyway, it'd be better for them not to even be there, because the Jews are a passive people. They're simple people. They don't have any power. They just want to be left alone. That was what I was taught, and I'll have one more growing up being taught the history of theology, Jesus, the Church, the Temple. We knew the temple fell, but did I ever hear anything other than, yeah, the prophecy came true. The temple fell in seventy eighty. I had no eye idea how big of a deal
this was for the Jewish nation. I didn't know the way that it scorned them, and I didn't know about the tallmu. So that to me is just a average intelligence thinking guy tells me, if the majority of the Evangelical Church and maybe the Catholic Church too, is purposely obfuscating and not talking about giant swaths of historical fact, we have a serious problem. And my audience is mostly
evangelical or former evangelicals who are starting to get these things. So, you know, to me, I kind of went on a rant there, But that's that was one of my big awakenings, was all the things they didn't teach me that all I've got to do is pick up a book and read about it. I'm like, how is this never said?
You know?
So I'll ask one more question along these lines and we'll move on to Epstein. Now that you're Orthodox and you've been through the Catholicism, you know, ten year phase. You started out as a Baptist, so you know that theology. I think you said you were in Baddist Seminary.
Well, I went to about Bible College, and then I did a semester of Bonson Seminary, which was a non accredited school that focused on the apologetics and the theology of Greg Bonson and the Christian Reconstructionists. So but that was right when I was converting out of Protestantism, is when I left that school.
Okay, what are the biggest gaps that are filled for you by the Orthodox Church that Catholicism didn't have or the Evangelical Church didn't have, and then maybe a different set of things for both of those. But why did you land on Orthodox?
Well, there's a lot of different things.
I'll just try to boil it down to like I said earlier, you know, when I got into studying the formation of the Biblical Canon, that that really got me into looking into the church fathers and the ecumenical councils, and what was the attitude of the Christians immediately after the death of the Apostles, right, so this is called the post Apostolic fathers. So I started reading Clement and Ignacious and Cyprian, all these bishops of the early Church.
And then, of course, even as a Baptist, I remember, you know, well, we believe the Council of Nicea because it taught, you know, the deity of Christ. And I went to actually read Nicea and the church fathers who were there, and you know, Saint Athanasius and these guys, and I realized, okay, they believe a lot of stuff that I don't believe. And I read City of God,
which was Augustine's gigantic apologetic. I read the whole thing when I was at Bible College, and I took I wrote down a bunch of questions for the Baptist professors.
I went took at my.
Questions that I said, can you guys tell me, like, why does he believe in the real presence? Why does he say he believes in absolute succession? Why does he talk about relics, and why does he talk about all this stuff? That just doesn't really make sense with Baptist theology, and I I didn't really get good answers, and so that kind of led me gradually out of Baptist stuff into Covenant theology and then into you know, I didn't even know about Orthodoxy back then. It was like two
thousand and four or five. I just knew about Catholicism and Protestant debates. And I think when you're Protestant, if you're a young person and you are looking into this stuff, especially in the two thousands, but there's a lot fewer resources online, you didn't really I didn't know about Vatican Two yet, I didn't know what it taught. I just thought, Okay, I'm looking at what's the historic church, and it's either going to be something like, you know, Anglican, or it's
going to be something like you know, Lusing maybe. And I gave all of those a lot of a lot of chances. I read about six of Luther's commentaries and works. I read several Anglican texts, Petertoon, people like that, and I just ultimately didn't find a lot of those arguments about the church from those churches perspectives very convincing. So that was always in the back of my head, even as a Protestant, or even even when I convert to Catholicism.
I was like, Okay, this has got to be it.
And then when you get into the Roman Catholic documents, as I've got like a bunch of Vatican two and all all the ecumenical councils and the people encyclicals over there, like, you just start to notice, Okay, Rome has changed its theology. So what do I do with this? And for me, it was just because I had such a love for church history. I want to know then, okay, well, the true Church, if it's not any of those, it's got to have the same teaching as the church in all
those early centuries. So I'm looking for a church that didn't change its fundamental doctrines. What church still teaches what, for example, the Canons of Nice say, I'm not talking about the Nicene Creed, some of the canons that accompany the creed, because the canons also give us an insight into the mind of the Church fathers and the people who compose those creeds. And people might say, well, yeah, I don't really care about the Church fathers though, I'm
just really interested in what the Bible says. Well, the problem with that is that as I was reading evangelical scholars like F. F. Bruce on the Canon Scripture or Lee McDonald Formation of the Biblical Canon, they were admitting this important role of tradition and even knowing what texts were apostolic. So certainly apo authorship is a key point when it comes to the Canon. It's not the only thing,
but it's a very important point. Well, if we don't know who Matthew the author, Matthew was other than the church saying in different bishoprics and ce, this is the text that Matthew wrote. And if we're having to rely on, for example, Irenaeus or Cyprian to reconstruct a lot of early manuscript evidence for the Bible itself. In other words,
we're looking at say Urinaus and his voluminous writings. He cites many, many, many New Testament passages and Old Testament passages, and those are other witnesses to the veracity of the New Testament texts and the Old Testament texts in the second century.
So that's very early.
And none of these people have Protestant views on anything. I don't believe in soul Scripture. They don't believe in soilo grascia, they don't believe in a memorialist view of the Eucharist, they don't believe in a symbolic view of baptism. I mean, they believe in all these things that I thought were you know, really problematic teachings. And so, you know, why would I trust those people to put the Bible together when I think that they have heretical, you know,
fundamentally wrong theology on the Gospel. And so it just
really caused me to re evaluate everything. But then in the Roman Catholic world, you know, you have all these problems as well, with innovations and change, and so eventually, in about twenty fifteen sixteen, I just came to the position that the only church that really maintains the essential fundamental core, not just theology, but also the practice of the church, no changes in the liturgy, no revolutions like Vatican two did with Novasorto Mass and all that is
the Orthodox Church. And so the more I studied, the more I spent time in the Orthodox world, the more I was convinced that, you know, for Christianity, that's really the all there is, that's the only authentic expression of Christianity.
That's not to say that there's not problems in the Orthodox world. It has its own problems, for.
Sure, but I really felt like there was no more fundamental, systemic level problems and contradictions like I had in the Protestant world in the Roman Catholic world.
So that was the long story as to why I ended up there.
You know, this may seem like a cheap question, but I think it's a question a lot of people like myself would have who have never been to an Orthodox church. You know, you Jay, as you your regular guide, dressed normal and all that, do you wish that the would you call them priests?
The author?
Okay, so the priests of the Orthodox do you wish that they dressed like you and I?
Or do you?
This comes out of when Christianity permeated society. It made sense for them to, even in the day to day world, have themselves marked out as unique because in our review, you know, it's not a weekend profession, it's a it's every day I mean, in the Orthodox Church, priests priests have to do things every day all day, so they're
basically twenty four to seven ministers. Now there's obviously flexibility there, Like a lot of priests have jobs as well, so they might be working, you know, I mean, they have families.
In the Orthodox Church, priests are married.
I'm glad to hear that they have families and they have kids, so there might be situations obvious where they're not all the time dressed. One of my best friends is a deacon in an Orthodox Church, and deacons a lot more important role than it is saying the Calolic Church or even the Protestant Church. Deacons are right next to priests. They're ordained that there's who that's who's ordained to the priesthood is the is the deacon. So and they do a lot of the teaching, a lot of
the theology in the Orthodox world. And uh, you know, my my buddy for the deacon annyas he's always going skiing, but he doesn't ski in his cassick.
So I mean, it's not like you have to always address it.
But I think again, this is just a practical thing that comes out of you know, the early Middle Ages, to delineate within a Christian society who the minister is, because you know, it's a twenty four to seven job.
Yeah, Okay, Well, we could do a whole show on that, but the title of this show is it has to do with Epstein. So I'm going to let you insert knowing kind of generally what my audience is. They're all seeing what I'm seeing. Most of them are from an evangelical background, or they still are in it, but they might be asking questions. They know about the Epstein files, they've heard generally what's in it. I'll let you just start this conversation with, you know, high level, what do
you think people need to know? First? And then let's dig into some of the responses and reactions.
I think the simplest way to make this palatable is if everybody saw Specter, the James Bond film with Daniel Craig that came out a few years ago, Right, I mean, basically that's real. That's the easiest way I could think to explain it. Maybe everybody can immediately relate to in
some kind of recent recent movie. And if you saw, you know, movies like Kubrick's Size White Shut, you know, that's another movie that I think was really pivotal for explaining to the mass consciousness, you know, in a movie way, because everybody can relate to movies, especially from our generation.
You know that that kind of stuff is it's not one und percent real.
Obviously, James Bond's a fictional character, but it's based on composites of what these people knew and saw in their real life. And so, you know, Epstein might not be the top of the you know, villain hierarchy in terms of real power and control because he had.
A limited amount of wealth.
He was more of a mid tier kind of fixer, controller, consultant person. But he was definitely a blowfelk kind of person. You know, if you remember Inspector, when James Bond is trying to infiltrate and figure out who's running this criminal syndicate that's responsible for terrorism, responsible for wars, responsible for all this, you know, he infiltrates this meeting that's kind of like a World Economic Forum Davos Builderberg meeting, and
you've got these you know, specter villains. They're talking about, Yes, this year, we have increased human trafficking forty percent. You know, we have stolen thirty three billion dollars in you know, mortgage lending.
So they're basically.
Listing all of their crime stats at this giant meeting so I would say that's pretty much kind of how it is. And you know, with Epstein, what we have is a person recruited into an operation early on through Bill Barr of the OSS and into what would be something adjacent to the CIA. This is why he has multiple passports. For example, as Whitney Web points out in her book, that operation ends up funneling him into Wall Street bear Stearns. He's an insider trader there, he gets
busted for that, and ironically he has a partner. His partner is the one that does time. So I think that's a key indicator that early on Epstein didn't do any time for the insider trading at bear Stearns, but what he was learning was criminal organizations in relation to high finance. So then Maxwell and just Lame bring him into their operation, which we know was a Rothschild front, and that's where he was taught corporate takeover procedures viper
corporatism there and then also the blackmail stuff. Right, So this would then suggest that Robert Maxwell, who was British Intelligence and Masade, was also then sort of grooming and teaching Epstein how to run that operation.
Let's work on Maxwell on Robert for just a second, because a lot of people have not read the book The Super Spy and all that. I have not read it myself, but I do you know, I was very surprised. I knew that Jeffrey Epstein was Jewish, I did not know Maxwell was, And later on I found out she was, and I was like, well, I wonder where when her father had that weird death, where's he buried? Because that
sometimes tells a lot about where somebody's loyalties lie. And I find out, Wow, he was given a state funeral in Israel, attended by both state leaders and religious leaders, and then buried on the Mount of Olives, like.
He's buried in Israel because most of his lifetime of service was to the Nation instead of Israel for espionage. But then we had that really curious email where Epstein said, yeah, I'll tell you the real story of what happened to him and his death, and it was that he was
sort of playing both sides in the Cold War. He was also passing on something seekers to the KGB to the Soviets, which is interesting because I have a friend who's a specialist in that area, and he translates old KGB communicas and documents, and one of the articles that he translated about ten years ago on his website was about Robert Maxwell from the vantage point of the KGB.
And what's funny is that they actually said, Okay, we think he's playing both sides and he's selling us secrets as well, so they kind of knew what he was up to and that was confirmed, assuming that Epstein is telling the true story in this recent email, because it says that what he did was he sort of took it upon himself to say that he was going to be the attachade to the Soviets for Massade, and they didn't really want him to do that, but he did
it anyway, and then he tried to extort Massade for four hundred million pounds, and that is important, according to Epstein, what led to his untimely demise of falling off the boat. But they still apparently gave him a, you know, a
heroes burial in Israel. So another person kind of like that is James G. Sangleton, the Cold War person who was very closely in the JFK files when that came out, also liaison with Israel, and of course that shows a degree of backdoor telecommunications and messaging with Masad, and then partly I think motivation for Masaud and the CIA and organized crime.
To have a role in JFK. So yeah, you know.
I'm glad you brought up JFK because that was another eye opener for me when I came to the knowledge. And I don't know where you land on who's at the top of this world power structure, but I do know, and I think it's a new kind of hit term has packed Judaica. There is definitely a rise of what's happening in Israel according to their eschatology that they're pushing forward, be it political or religious or both. It's happening, okay, and everything that springs forth from that. Where was I
going with that? Oh? Regarding JFK though, So you've got that going on. You've got JFK back in the late fifties and sixties doing you know, he's writing angry letters with David mc gurion. He's not letting them do what they want with their nuclear testing. He's not wanting to give what was previously known before Apak it was just Israeli intelligence. I knew all that stuff already, all right,
And then they redacted. I think most of it. Of course, it's you know, fifty sixty years later, so people don't care quite as much. But what shocked me was this most of the redactions that had been I'm sorry, the unredactions that had been redacted for decades had to do
with anything to do with Jewish intelligence, Israeli intelligence. There was a whole line about you know, we've got the Jewish money now, like all this stuff that would be highly embarrassing to Christian Zionists and their platforms, and I was still it was the first time I was shocked by this where it's like, this has been one of those conspiracies that people have been asking about for decades.
It finally comes out. And I remember guys like Eric Taxes and others, if they tweeted about it, they were like, oh, so it was the CIA, Yeah, it was the CIA.
It's like.
I just I was. I was dumbfounded. And I guess maybe you wouldn't be dumbfounded by that because you'd already seen through a lot of the way that those people operate. But it kind of told me also, why today with something as dark and deep as this Epstein release and the things that it's alluding to why they're just able to ignore it and and not have to pay the price for that.
Well, yeah, that's there's a complicated connection and intertwining of a lot of interests. And I've always thought, going back a year now, that the reason that Trump wasn't so eager to release these was that, like Alex said that he was asked, I think, on the on behalf of you know, British intelligence and Israeli intelligence and the CIA, to not do this because it would be too devastating and destabilizing.
Right.
So that makes sense to me, And that's because I think with Epstein, especially if you look into.
The money managing and the.
Mega Group and Les Wexner and the billionaires that are involved, this would be the up ending of a lot of the existing financial structure, the Fiat system. That's why it was so I think amazing that you had the very beginning of the Bandon interview. Epstein says, well, I was also brought in through bear Stearns and what I learned there to Rockefeller's networks of the Trilateral Commission, because I understood high finance and fractional reserve banking, the Fiat debt system,
that we have. He said, I understood that so well that I was able to explain that to a lot of them. So they recruited me into trilateral, which again shows that it's not well, is it the roll Trials or is it David Rockefeller, is it Barzenski, or is it Kissinger or who's a builder bird? They're all part of the same steering groups, networks and committees, and the Rothchilds and the rock Fillers work together. They're banking empires that are joined at and heaven.
For a long time.
For example, in the United States, JP Morgan has been for a long time a front for Rothchilds, so they
did have a presence here. It just wasn't called Roche It was called JP Morgan and JP Morgan, Chase and Chase Bank, and they've all been working together because at that level, if you look at something like the Bank for National Settlements, which is the Global feder Reserve, right, America has it's Federal Reserve private bank, and the world has it's Federal Reserve of Federal Reserves, which is the BIS that was all set up post World War Two
by the entities that we're talking about, like JP Morgan Bank and Allen Della set of Schroeder Bank, et cetera. So that's who's really running the system and the sex stuff and all of that. It's I mean, it matters, but it plays a role in compromising those powerful people, right, that's the blackmail side of it. Maxwell was doing that kind of stuff too, back during the Cold War. So this is not a new thing. It's an old thing.
We've lectured, for example on my channel for a long time out of a bunch of books just from historians about the history of sexpionage or sex blackmail. I mean, this is this is a long time state practice. Nothing new there either. In fact, for example, Japan was able to have a lot of success in the Japanese Chinese War back at the turn of the century because a
figure named Kinji Douihara. He was Japan's epstein, and he was able to figure out how to set up a network of brothels throughout China, put flood China with opium and then compromise them and get the prostitutes to be spies. And China basically was unable to fend off Japan's attacks during that war. So I'm not trying to deflect off of Epstein, but sure, just pointing out that this is this is if you get into history, like this is
a pretty well known thing. But again, I mean Epstein understood the Vatican Bank, he understood that it it's a secret bank. He understood shadow banking, and a lot of that.
Comes out in the band and interview.
So that's the real, I think, crux of how they know how to game the system by shorting markets on the basis of advanced intelligence. And that's really important because there's that famous story about Waterloo and the Rothchild's having advanced intelligence and then buying up the market and the UK stock market when it collapsed. Well, turns out in the Rothchild's other osbiography there's a whole section where they
brag about that being true. They say, yes, of course we were able through advanced intelligence to buy up the stock market.
There it is right there.
And so what I'm getting at is that fast forward two hundred years from the eighteen hundreds to now, and Jeffrey was doing the exact same thing as the representati of the Rothchild's saying yeah, we have advanced intelligence, we collapse through chaos, and then we buy up on the fire sale out of the chaos.
Yeah, it's an old system, there's no doubt about that. I wish I had the different emails in front of me. I'd like to get your take on what should people believe, you know, because anybody can say, oh my gosh, they were There's emails about satanic torture, rituals, child murder. I mean the worst things like you just just think it in your mind of how horrible it could be. And I don't want to say because I don't want to get kicked off of YouTube, but bad, bad stuff with small,
small children, and it's alluded to an emails. There's a lot of the symbolic language. I'm not just talking about the Pizzagate language, but I'm talking about even more clear stuff. There's also a hatred of Christianity. There's making fun of little girls that are saying I knew Jesus would be with me and stuff like that that's just like really dark and can lead people into if they believe in the evil that much, there must be a god, then Jesus must be real.
You know.
My question and all that Jay, is this, what do you believe people should should believe about this? When they read the emails about the really dark stuff. What is true, what is not? And how do you know?
Yeah, the ones that have been fake I think are pretty obviously fake common sense wise. You know some of those clip together AI pictures of Trump with little kids, and I'm not just trying to defend Trump just to defend Trump, but I mean that was obviously fake. The email between Epstein and Maxwell about creating bitcoin was obviously fake. It had two different two's up at the top, so that was obviously a fake email.
The other thing, let me clarify by question I'm not talking about I shouldn't have said fake or real. I meant, what is a joke where they're haha, like to them, it's really dark, but it's locker room humor to them versus no, they're really engaging in this stuff.
Yeah, good question.
I mean some of that is a little hard to decide for, Like you know, that's why I put a tweet up today asking a question like when he says the thing about shrimp and you cut the head off and you keep the body, like, I mean, is he talking about seafood or is he talking about something else? Some of them are ambiguous. It's hard to say, but I would say that given the the multitude of references, it's really odd that they would be so obsessed with beep jerky pizza and these these weird sort of code.
Words, and the fact that they're redacted.
Why would you redact a bunch of things and names if they're just talking about junk food and seafood. So I think that's very suspect and probably is the case, because if you think about it, you know, if you read C. S.
Lewis's Space Trilogy, the.
Third volume, it has this scientific institute called Nice, which is supposed to be funny because they're like a satanic scientific, you know, entity, like the Tavisak Institute basically, And one of the things they do is that when they recruit people into Nice, and csours is writing about the demonic international control structure in that book, the aliens are actually demons.
At Nice.
They have a ritual where you're initiated, but you have to degrade yourself and you have to do the most degrading things to join, because then they know that you've made your bones, like in the mafia, right, so they have the dirt on you, so you're never going to wrap them out because you've done the worst imaginable thing, and I think that that's what's going on here, is that for those people, it is kind of a Satanic joke.
Hard to know exactly how many of them took Satanism seriously, but you don't have to take theistic Satanism seriously to be under the control of Satan.
I mean, you can be atheist. You've been atheist to me engaging in this.
I mean some of the emails between biologist and people like that, talking about how you can do worse things with kids. I'll just leave it at that, like that suggests you know that these people are I mean, you can be an atheist to be completely degraded.
Yeah.
There were two Christians who are well known who were mad at me for things that I was saying, tying Epstein to the Tumud, or to to Israel or Judaism or whatever, and both of them the route they took was to say, well, he worked for Arab nations as well, and there's just as much, just as much evidence that he was being funded also by that. I think one mentioned Katar. You know, it's like I've read I've never met an Arab or heard of any mom that uses
Goyam as a phrase in like multiple emails. I've never seen anybody of any other faith have the prime minister come like the Israeli Prime Minister come visit a whole bunch and talk about the jew It's the Jews versus
the world. Presently Jews are winning. Like, how do you tie him or do you tie him to religious Judaism or I think from my own research, is not as much the nation of Israel itself, but it's more like he was proud of his Jewish heritage and spoke of it often alongside of these really dark emails.
Well, Judaism has a lot of ways that you could can take it. I mean, you have people who are Jewish who have basically no beliefs, atheistic, and you have you know, people who are extreme Rabbinic Jews who when you get into Telmuodick and rabbinic rabbinic philosophy and theology. I mean, it's basically just like a cult and doesn't really differ in any way from other weird cults in terms of the practices, the irrational rules and.
Legalities.
But also within other world religions, even Islam at a very high level, you can have people who are in an inner core clique that don't act or profess what the public, profane members of the religion and the masses have right, So there could always be these kind of
inner clicks. For example, if you read Ezekiel, you'll remember that Ezekiel has shown a vision at one point where he sees that behind what's going on in the temple worship, they have a secret compartment where they're engaging in abominable
practices on the download in the tunnels. So there has always been this tradition, I think, within any religion, and that includes tumudig Judaism too, to have an inner, secret approach and a secret religion that practices all kinds of who knows what, And that again, this is what even the prophets themselves talk about. Jeremiah talks about the Jews practicing human sacrifice while on the face of it they pretend that they're righteous. So this goes back to the
Old Testament, This goes back to the ancient world. Shouldn't be surprising that there would still be these kinds of traditions. And one of the things that Epstein see to refer to, especially in the Bannon interview, is Kabbala, which is medieval Jewish mysticism, which can range from speculations about numerology and gematria all the way over to ritual magic, creating sigils,
invoking and trying to control dybooks or demons. And it's interesting that Leslie Wesner himself has said in interviews that he does believe and he's not joking that he's possessed by a dybbuk, which is the Hebrew word for a devil. So there is absolutely a component of cabalistic mysticism in terms of Epstein's philosophy, so far from what I've seen from the interview, and that's the public Bannon interview.
Go ahead. Well, there was also that.
Picture too, where it's hard to tell exactly. It could just be an old set of encyclopedias, but it does look like there's a picture with him with the set of the Talmud behind him. So I wouldn't be surprised if he didn't have obviously some tumutic influence. And you don't have to go into buying a fifty volume Talmud set. I mean, you can get academic texts like Peter Schaefer, who himself is a Jewish scholar, has a book called Jesus and the Talmud.
There's a whole chapter on how Plashimus the Talmud is.
So yes, I've got it right over there. It was very enlightening, and he wrote it in such a way. I mean, I did not know he was Jewish. I actually thought he was German. But he I mean, he's a Princeton professor, and yeah, he's very, very respected even by among Jewish people.
Well, I mean, evangelicals just need to come to grips with the fact that rabbinic telmeutic Judaism is nothing like the Old Testament proto Christianity. Right, Old Testament Hebrew Christianity is what prepares the way for the Church. Yes, and that's not what today's rabbinic Jews teaching. In fact, Rebinic Judaism even says, you don't read those texts, you don't read the Torah. You read the Talmud and that tells you what the Torah means.
Yes, absolutely, there's a really weird thing. And I deal with this all the time because again I'm still in this world and maybe I still respect these people too much, and it drives me nuts. It's probably a personal flaw, really and I need to consider them a little bit more irrelevant. But you've got all these evangelical leaders that are leading their flocks to do service trips in Israel, to kiss the wall, to love Israel, to the They would never call it worship, but that is actually what
it is. I've just seen that they turn a blind eye to every evil and it's crazy. But yet, if I show them a video of the most celebrated Talmudic Kabbalistic wizard of the twentieth century, it would be the revy Menochem Schneerson, and people would say these samely. It would say, well, that's an outlier, that's a marginal thing. No, it's not. That's where Mike Huckabee and Trump will go, symbolically at minimum to pray and to throw their little
prayers at his grave. And it's just super weird. And then I could show these same people, Okay, what did he preach in his synagogues and translate his weird Yiddish Hebrew to English and he's speaking straight Kabbalah. He's straight up saying our souls is Jewish people, we're the chosen ones of God. We have different souls from the sphere of light. And the Goyam they have souls of darkness, and through our ticcoon alone, we're going to save the world.
And you know he believed in the Noahyde laws and that gets into Jewish eschatology, which I was never taught. And you see it happening. It's like, what for that little country with so few people to actually accomplish what they would need, They would need to fool the biggest, most powerful countries in the world, well, which which you
know wall are all these countries' leaders kissing. It's that little wall over there, whatever it is, And I just I am every day, Jay, I'm bothered by this because I can't stand for Christian leaders who should see something so clear, that's so obvious to completely just be blind. I don't know if they're blind to it or if they know what's going on, and it just pays too well, I just don't know what it is. Can you help me with that?
Probably all the above going on, because you know, I remember when I was a Christian Zionist, you know, when I was younger. I've still got my scho filled Bible and I got my John Hagee Prophecy studied Bible over there.
Than I had when I was nineteen.
So yeah, I mean I remember what it was like to think in that way, and I think the things that began to really kind of make that crumble for me was I started realizing there's all these New Testament passages which are very clear that at the First Advent Jesus brought the Kingdom and brought the Church and fulfilled what the nation state of Israel and the Old Testament
was a type of. So if Israel is a type, it doesn't really make any sense to continue to think of what has been fulfilled as this future reality to yeah, be fulfilled. So in other words, when Galatians six says that the church at Galatia is the Israel of God, when Paul says in Galatians three that you're in Christ through faith, You're the seat of Abraham through faith in Christ,
there's no other seat of Abraham. In fact, Galatia, when he gives an algory, he says, those who serve at the temple are of this world, and they have no right to eat our flesh, our Christ, our Eucharist. Compare that to Hebrews thirteen, where he says we have an altar which we eat the sacrifice and of the Church, that those who serve at the tabernacle have no right to eat. So Judaism is presented as an Old Testament
thing that is now fulfilled. It is done and evangelical Zionism is a form of Judaizing heresy which doesn't recognize it. In Matthew twenty one forty three, when Jesus gives the parable of the bind Dresser, he says to the Phariseasons of the Jews, he says, you reject the message of
the prophets, and then when the sun comes you reject him. Therefore, the Kingdom of God is taken from you and given to a nation, producing the frue self thereof predicting the largely gentile Church, and that's exactly what we see in the Book of Acts. The Church shifts from largely Jewish in the first ten chapters to largely Gentile. No, that doesn't mean that Jews can't be saved, and I do believe Romans eleven does predict a future conversion of the Jews.
But Judaism as such, or the Nason of Israel as such, is not what those texts are talking about.
The Church is.
Israel, where would your eschatology. As an Orthodox person land today generally ten thousand foot level, you don't have to get into every nuance.
For Orthodox Christianity, pre millennialism is condemned by the Second Ecumenical Council, So you cannot be achillist. You can't believe in a literal thousand years because the thousand years is equated to the Kingdom and to the Church, and so if Jesus brought that at his first advent, no Orthodox Christian can affirm any kind of millennialism in a literal sense.
So post millennial or a millennial would be the norm amongst every church father and everybody for the first thousand years of Christianity.
Would you hold two post or a millennialism.
I tend to favor of post millennial view, but I'm not hard set on that. I think it's there's there's flexibility there.
Yeah, I would favor it too, just because it's the winning I like as an athlete athlete man like I hate, you know, fighting for something. I remember going to a Charlie Kirk event where I was I was a donor back in the day when I first kicked all this off. So I went down to Phoenix and I met with his teams and you know, did the whole thing you
do as a for a donor invite thing. And I remember reading his mantra for Turning Point and it was going on the offensive to win the culture war for Christ and I'm thinking, but Charlie Kirk's own premillennial dispensationalism says he's really going to lose this culture war and be raptured, and then it's going to get really awful, and then Jesus is going to come back at the end of that and you know, save the day, which is great, but it's like it was a weird juxtaposition
between you got this guy who's full of energy and wants to do the right thing, but really within his own theology, he's building a tiny pyramid of success within a much larger pyramid that he believes in that is going to count him out, you know what I'm saying, And that that conflict really bothered me. And that's actually the avenue with which I discovered the truth about Schofield and Darby and even some of the Jesuits before that.
It was maybe a strange way into that knowledge, but where I began to learn the truth about some of those eschatologies. So what else do you have to say on the Epstein thing, man, Because I feel like we're leaving some things on the table here. I should have written more questions down before we started. What are some other things you feel that people need to know about it?
Well?
I think, you know, again, it really vindicates the hunch that a lot of people in the conspiracy world had they didn't know all the details.
Maybe they couldn't fill everything in.
But just how wide scale and wide scope this this operation actually was. And you know, I think that at the top of the pyramid on the earthly plane, I guess you could say you have Rothschilds, Rockefellers, banking and corporate elites. There is a large, you know, Zionist component to that, for sure, but it's not exclusively that. For example, one of the emails that even surprised me was that Epstein had been scheduled to meet with like fifteen heads
of state across the world. He had this like planned out, He's going to go to all these different countries, and I think we see that a lot of say, you know, Saudi or Islamic countries. You know, really at that level of heads of state. It's it's an international networking of elites. It's not tied to a nation state. Right, so we might think that, oh, well, the Muslims hate the Jews.
Actually, and I was.
I was very ignorant of Islam even back in the two as a Christian. It's only been in the last seven or eight years that I've really gotten heavy into studying the history of Islam and debating all the top Muslims except for Muhammad, a job who won't agree to a debate.
But Islam is talmutic. This is what people don't understand.
Like people think, oh, well, if Christianity is true and Judaism is actually the thing that's subverting Christianity and the rabbinical Talmudic philosophy is evil, then the Muslims must be good because they're not as blasphemous as the Jews. Well, what people don't realize is that many scholars who are fairly neutral on the subject, they're not committed to any position. They've been reconstructing the actual origins of the influence on
Muhammad for many, many years, many decades. It turns out that Muhammad was very influenced by the Talmud many, many, many hadiths, and many many sections of the Qur'an are
directly out of Talmudic traditions. So what I think we get with the early phases of Islam is a person who was illiterate, in the case of Muhammad, and so he was hearing these these traditions and these stories about the prophets, and he was hearing about Jews, and he was hearing about this Jesus character, and he crafts his own religion, which he says originally early on, is I want this to be a way to reconcile Jews and Christians with my philosophy that is ultimately a religion for
the Arab peoples. So it begins with something as the revelation to the Arabs, because Muhammad thought that Judaism was God's revelation for Jews, and Christianity was Allah's revelation for the Christians, and then he would bring the revelation for the Arab peoples. So he saw it in a very ethnic way early on, and then he gets gets more and more radical and warlike in the later phases of the Qur'an to where he conceives of it as a
jad that's also literal. So I think we have to be very careful because I see a lot of evangelicals and a big fan of Tucker. Tucker's having me on a show that the whole segment with him, and I like Tucker, but I think he's also kind of leaning into this position, and that the Hodgewins and others are thinking, well, hey, maybe Islam's not that bad, maybe they're actually on our side.
No, no, it's not true at all.
They're they're absolutely anti Christ when you get into the real meat potatoes of what Islam teaches, and in fact, Muslims many people have said this, and even rabbis say Islam is the broom of Judaism. So if you're a Christian in the West, that's how to understand that. And no, the Imams are not your friends. Their Islam is not your friend at all. Just because they don't have as blasphemous language. Well, it doesn't matter, John saysn't one John.
Anybody who denies that Christ is the son of the Father and flesh is of the spirit of Antichrist. And that is fundamental to Islam to deny the deity of Christ. Whole religion is predicated on denying the deity of Christ, and it is rabbinically influenced heavily. So nobody should be misunderstanding this. And it doesn't make you don't fall into the low IQ dialectics of thinking that if you're against Islam, then you might be a Zionist, or if you're against Zionism you must be pro Islam can.
Be we're both of those.
Yeah. Where Tucker and others and the Hodge twins would be coming at this is they didn't know anything about Islam. They thought they did, and then they found out that when you talk to an act that.
Happened to me, this is me in the two thousands. I was in that same boat.
I didn't know about anything about Islam, and I thought, oh, well, maybe the Muslims are because they're Patsy's on nine to eleven. Maybe they were innocent. It's way more complex than that. But the religion is actually tell what, Dick, how.
Would you when you say it's anti Christ? But yet I will have a Muslim two or three that I know they will bless Christ in the way they talk about him. They will tell me that they don't believe that he is the Messiah in terms of a deity being the son of God. They do not believe that, but they do say very kind things about him. Now I know that that's that's still denying him as the Messiah.
That's a big deal. But in comparison, and this is why I'm saying, Tucker and Hodge Twins and many others would say, well, at least they're a little closer because they have good things to say about Jesus. In fact, one Muslim person, when he knew I was really into a difficult conversation about Zionism with another Christian of mine, friend of mine, he told me he's like, treat them
like Christ, to treat them like Jesus Christ. He was using that as a way for you know, so, I don't know what would you say to that.
No, there, I mean Muslim it's actually in the Qur'an to despise them in your heart and smile with your face. That's one of the lines in the Koran. So they do believe in the principle that you can lie to for the sake of jahad. You can lie to those who are not Muslims because they're actually guilty of shirk. So if you believe in the Trinity Muslims already believe that you are guilty of idolatry and you are liable to be put to death when Muslims have the power
to do so. And that is absolutely true. In fact, we've compiled many moms, especially Salafi and Sunni and moms, they actually say this in their sermons. They just say, befriend them until you have the upper hand and you subdue them and subject them. And yes, it is they are liable to be put to dead. Now, there can be different situations under Islamic law or what's called thick where in some situations they might tolerate you, but that doesn't mean that they're going to put a tax on you.
They're gonna make you submit to Sharia law. They're gonna make you submit to And you have to understand that there's as many Islamic sects as there are almost Protestant sects, So there's different ways of approaching this. Because when you bring this up, some Muslim will say, well, a Saud
protected Christians. That's true, a Sad is a sect of Muslims alo white that has a more positive attitude, and that might even be true in Iran, right, but that doesn't mean that the rest of the religion is in any way ultimately compatible with Christianity because there are these sectarian examples. I mean, you can find Christian sects that
are pacifist. Well, that doesn't make Christianity pacifist, right. So in the same way, Islam, in terms of its fundamental tax and it's hadiths, is a very crazy it's a crazy cult.
It's insane. You only have to get into Just go watch some of my debates with the Muslims and you'll see this very very quickly.
I think, okay, I think one last thing I'll say on this, and then we're going to move on to a subscriber only thing for about ten more minutes. The problem for the average mind who has broken out of worshiping the Jews as having a second Covenant running in the background. So now we're seeing it clearly, and we're like, well, the Muslims didn't kill JFK. The Muslims didn't attack the
US's liberty. The Muslims might have had a hand in nine to eleven, but it seems like Israel did too, So you know, the Muslims probably didn't have anything to do with Charlie Kirk's death. But Israel might have you know, you go down the line and it's like the Muslims. Jeffrey Epstein wasn't Muslim, and he was calling us goyam, which is a Jewish thing. So all these things are stacked up. And then you've got every single Glenn Beck out there just chanting all day long about the evils
of Islam, the evils of Islam. But yet there's this awakening happening where all of us Christians are like, okay, but we hear you, Glenn, but we've heard that our whole life. And you're not talking about all this stuff, like when the truth came out about JFK, you're just ignoring it. And oh, on top of that, it's not all of our politicians are not going to Mecca and
kissing that cube. They're going and kissing the wall and you know, kind of doing this what I think is a humiliation ritual where they're saying, we're subservient to this future, whatever this plan is. And just the same way you describe Jay of Islamic eschatology and where they think all this is going and how you know they'll be kind to your face until they can subdue you and kill you or whatever. The Jewish eschatology is exactly the same.
So that I think that's why Epstein wrote Jews Versus the World Jews currently.
Winning, yeah again.
And both of those principles for both of the religions are Talmudic. It's a Talmudic dual ethic principle that's in Judaism and in Islam, to have one ethic for the outside letters and a separate ethic for the insiders.
I learned the other day from Yanadanoon and her husband who lived in Israel for a long time and they discovered they were a Christian Zionists. They discovered what you're talking about and left. They told me that in this this lends credibility to what you're saying. They said that under Jewish what is it Hallockic law? Is that the right word that a Jewish person can pray in a mosque and it's a valid prayer, but they cannot pray in a Christian church.
You did.
Many rabbis have that ruling.
And but remember Judaism is very flexible because in traditional Jewish practice, you don't ask a bunch of different rabbis.
You just asked your rabbi. And in their system.
Typically God is giving you your answer through whatever rabbi that you asked, So you don't like go check fact check a bunch of you know, rabbis to find the true rabbinic position, so you can have Judaism. Again, that's atheistic, or that's Haraati, or that's it's all over the place.
So uh, yeah, but I've.
Heard many rabbis give the ruling that to pray inside a Christian church would be idolatry because they don't worship the Trinity. But because Muslims worship the One God, it's uh, it's not idolatry.
Yeah, okay, and that makes sense. Well, to everyone watching on substack, keep watching. To everyone else, come on over to j SLAYUSA dot com and you can watch this full feature with Jay Dyer. What is your take on Trump's involvement with Epstein? What what you've seen of his name in the files?
What?
Just in general, I'll lay it out there. What's your your opening take on that