This is just absurd levels of stupidity and hypocrisy, and it's just it's kind of amazing to me. And people think that this is some kind of based, red billed thing.
It's not.
It's a completely controlled and manipulated operation and it has nothing really to do with these ideologies other than that these are controlled groups that are controlled by Western intelligence to engage in irregular warfare, to engage in proxy warfare, to destabilize and to restructure and destroy areas to fit them into not the American century. Do people understand that all these boomers and Cold War people think over more fat to communists, We're going to keep the KG being
Russia out of Ukraine. No, it's not the American century anymore. Do you understand that that was a con at this anniversary, I guess you could say of one year of tragedy in terms of warfare.
In the Ukraine. And so I thought it'd be great to kind.
Of rehearse how we got to where we are and what the dangers are here, because you know, lately I've been diving really deep into the Cold War, trying to get an assessment of what was really going on, why there was this larger project throughout the Cold War to kind of synthesize and create this third way out of the Cold War dialectic for a future technocracy. And we know that from a lot of the writings of the elite, which we've covered in the last several years, some fifty or sixty.
Though, So if we go back to the reason for.
The twentieth centuries, two World Wars and the Cold War, according to doctor Carl Quickly, that was to exhaust the opponents of the Anglo American establishment, and they would exhaust them through two World Wars and then through a Cold War. And if we fast forward up to what happened to Russia in the fall of Sovietism, the fall of Communism, this led to the invasion of Western economic warfare and looting.
This is the Harvard Summer's Reuben crew that came in and through IMF shock therapy, reorganized and looted the wealth of Russia. So while I'm sure too many people's public appearances, the idea was that Russia was going to be freed from Sovietism. And it's true that the Soviet system was a nightmare, terrible system, and communism is a nightmare, terrible system absolutely one.
Hundred percent, and it's just amazing to me.
I can never really talk about this topic without people getting mad and assuming that I'm somehow kind of defending communism or Sovietism, when all I'm really trying to point out when we look into this is that there's a danger of taken on new masters, and particularly in the realm of the religious world, which we've been covering as we've analyzed various tech to get into the history of NATO and the history of the can and both the CIA and the KGB kind of vying for influence and
power with the Vatican.
In order to understand this, we have to understand the Cold War.
And getting out of the dialectical thinking of thinking that the West is necessarily good and the East is necessarily evil. If you read Brezenski, for example, in his older writings all the way back to his nineties text, he talks about this being a Manichean dialectic, says the Cold War was a Manichean dialectic arising out of the powers in
the post World War two period. And we might think that the West was waging a war against communism and socialism, but the reality is that the elites of the West were not really anti Marxist. They were against what you might call classical Marxism. And that's because classical Marxism failed to achieve its objectives, precisely because.
There was no workers revolution, right. The workers didn't rise up.
We didn't see the proletariat overthrowing their masters and.
Taking over the means of production.
But what did happen was that there was a reformed Marxism that found itself a lot more amenable to big capital, known as Fabian socialism, that was a lot more effective.
And had a lot more power and influence.
And it is in fact, entities like the IMF, the World Bank, the United Nations, et cetera, et cetera set up by the same Rhodes Milner Rawschild round table groups that then were able to seize America as well and turn it into an engine for this same power block.
And they did that via backdoor deals, backdoor intelligence operatives such as Noel Coward, Rodahl, Ian Fleming, William Stevenson and others who convinced FDR and convinced people in the administration to set up this private intelligence network, this secret intelligence network known.
As the osays that we become the CIA, which.
Becomes America, comes Americ's government, and the secret Government wasn't really tasked with protecting America from invaders, protecting America from foreign threats. Really it was tasked with controlling and steering America. Because we see that the other entity that was created out of this was, of course the Council on Foreign Relations, and that's a policy steering group that sits above the government structure, and it in fact hands down.
The policies of the global elite to the government.
As an unaccountable, unelected bureaucratic structure that then controls government. So you're electing elected officials that submit to and are handed policy by these people.
Who are unelected.
And if you look at entities in the government that really run things, the National Security Council, the State Department, it's always CFR people always, And the same CFR people go to the Bilderberg Group, and they are also members of the Trilateral Commission, and they make decisions about corporate policy globally as well as government policy globally. Because these
corporations are above government, they own government. And until we recognize that, until people can figure that out, there's not going to be any changes. I'm not saying you can't care about who's elected. But as Quigley says, the president is limited, right, president can only do so much. Your senators, your congressman, they can only do so much. I mean,
maybe on a local level they can do more. But we're dealing with an international elite, and there's not an international clique that not only has the ability to set up global institutions that give top down global policy.
Remember, in the last three years, what do they say now it's.
Going to be the UN and the CDC getting their policies directly from Rockefeller Foundation. This last week, they had the World Government Government Summit, right, and they had all these global elites out there pushing for the idea of an international health organization treaty and control grid that would enforce mandated stabbys because what held them up the last time was local, national, and state laws. So they couldn't
forcibly stabby everybody because of regulations. They were saying, and I put these clips on my Twitter if you want to see them from the World Government Summit, and so they said, in the next pandemic, we want to get rid of all that so that we can forcibly forcibly inject.
Or experiment on track and.
Trays, and so while Russia has within it, of course a fifth column, as Russian geopolitical analysts have written about, because a lot of the foundations that think tanks to Carnegie Endowment and so forth, Michael mcfowel, they've been in Russia for a long time. Because the West took over and restructured after the collapse via the IMF shock therapy
and the Harvard people. Then we have putin kicking out a lot of these oligarchs right late nineties, early two thousands, and that led to a new struggle, a new Cold War, this new East West battle that's now emerging as a real large threat.
So let's get into more of that.
We want to talk about heartland theory, Mackinder, all that kind of stuff to go us to background as to where we might go in this crisis. On guest host Jay Dire jays Nolysis, Welcome back to the Jay Dier Jasonolysis talking about the setting for how we got into this grand chess board situation with Russia and the new conflicts that have arisen the last year, how it arises out of the alignments coming out of the Cold War, and we were talking about this idea of controlling the
Eurasian heartland. This is an idea that comes out of the British imperial strategy of Lord Halford Mackinder and it was the kind of operating system for the British Empire as a sea empire, seeking to control the land power, the sea power and the land power, the landpower of course being the Eurasian heartland. And that's why, of course Russia and Ukraine are so crucial in this strategy. Russia has to always be kept at bay, always has to
be pushed back. That was the purpose of NATO actually as a defensive strategy during the Cold War and then became offensive after the Cold War, which was a violation of what NATO was supposed to be.
But we see NATO now tweeting out on its actual profile.
That NATO is the Marvel Hero Universe power as it fights against the evil Russians. Yeah, kids, you not, that's actually on NATO's Twitter. They're tweeting out that they are William Wallace. They are, even though William Wallace actually fought against degenerate British kings. But NATO is saying that they're William Wallace because they're freedom fighters. What does it mean to fight for freedom?
What is free?
And well, in the case of this, this war has now been cast as a rainbow skittles tr n S war and NATO fighting for the rights of trn S. So isn't ironic that in the Cold War, you know, we were told that we're being persecuted by atheist communists and if we just have neoliberalism, if we open up these other countries behind iron curtain to economic liberalism, we'll have freedom.
Religion can come back.
But what happened was, in reality, the largest institution in the West, the religious institution of the Roman Catholic Church, was literally being co opted, advised, and utilized by the Central Intelligence Agency, and multiple books confirm this. Now, the deeper that I go into this, I'm really just amazed at how wide and how deep spread this is.
Even from two conflicting views of the Cold War.
You have somebody like Paul Williams, who's a Roman Catholic who's very critical of the CIA and the Vatican during the Cold War, who admits that it was essentially a captured institution for the CIA, And then we have a cold warrior himself, John Kohler's book that admits that. Yeah, of course, the Brazenski, of course, Kissinger, of course, William Casey. Of course, they were all working and all the way
back to William Colby with Gladio. Of course, they were working hand in and with the Vatican, funneling black ops funds through the Vatican Bank to fight against the Soviets. And it sounds plausible, right, It sounds okay, that makes sense. We don't want a bunch of commies running everything. But the danger here is that when Uncle Sam wins, it's not really Uncle Sam that wins. And it's not really communism being defeated for free market capitalism, it's monopoly capital
using Babian socialism to restructure these countries. I mean, is the EU does this seem to be a economic freedom based institution?
To you?
Does the IMF seem like something that's based around economic freedom and liberty? Does you NESCo seem like something based around economic freedom and liberty? Well, if you mean by economic freedom and liberty going back to the British Empire and social Darwinism and you know those things, I guess it does make sense that would be atimistic individualistic enlightenment libertarianism based around atheistic evolutionary philosophy, in which case rights.
Don't actually exist. What's this thing? Is rights? Rights or just arbitrary?
Because if our all just manifestations of nature, nature doesn't have rights. Do you think the predator prey relationship has anything to do with rights?
Now, it's just brute power, brute force.
And so we're presented with the situation post Enlightenment of are you going to choose Hobbesian leviathan state or do you want a revolutionary anarco state. No state, which, always, as Plato says, falls over into tyranny because when you have the rule of the many anarchy, that falls over into despotism and oligarchy. And so it's just amazing to
me that people would buy into this dialectic. And we're supposed to have believed that NATO was the good guy all these years, and the reality is that we're talking about two different bad guys. Okay, we're talking about Soviet communism foisted upon Russia and the Baltic States via elites in the West. It's not Russia organically that was communists. It's not the West organically that has any of these ideologies that are unnatural to these people groups. These are
created ideologies that are techniques and systems of control. And so now that we're in this post Cold War era where the war became an international war on terror, I was watching a goofy movie the other night that illustrated this in a very profound way, which surprised me. We've done a lot of analyzes of the Bond films, and typically we think about, oh, well, the most revelatory ones are going to be the ones, you know from the classic Ian Fleming period.
But I was watching Tomorrow.
Never Dies from nineteen ninety seven, and the weirdest part about that one, I think that's the second to last, or maybe it's it's the second Pierce Brosman Bond film. And if you remember this plot, it's it's pretty instructive because you have this giant media empire, the Carver Media Group.
Jonathan Price plays the Bond villain as a media mogul, and the media mogul decides that the the world can be manipulated through fake news big news right, and so not only does he engineer crises, he also creates the narrative around the crises that he's engineered.
And the plot.
Involves the East and the West being manipulated in to a conflict by an international supra international group.
And that's always in the Bond films, right, Obviously there's Specter, this kind of thing. Now that's not Spector in this one. This is, you know, nineteen eighty seven. But here's the weird part.
So Bond ends up working together at times with Russian Soviet individuals. I guess we're supposed to think it's post Soviet, so they're not Soviet, but they act like you know that now it's a Soviet terror network. And then Bond aligns himself with a Chinese communist spy to unfoil the plot of the international elite. Now that's bizarre because okay, there are international elites that try to play these powers off against one another. And I think that to a degree,
that's what's going on. Because I'm not saying that there's no real conflict or there's no real war. There is, but I'm saying that in so many films we have an international elite, this kind of Kissinger Brazenski structure clouds, you know, the super international elite that plays the nation states off against one another, and they plan and prepare
for wars decades ahead of time. And so I think, yeah, absolutely, they wanted this war in the Ukraine, and they want a new Cold War, and it's part of the overall strategy to bring in the technocracy.
And we'll look at that here in a moment.
Get into the specifics of why these kinds of countries and states stand in the way.
Doesn't mean that they're perfect, but they stand in the way.
Have a certain kind of ideology, a certain kind of worldview that has to be pushed globally.
This point Max ass jay Di or Jay's analysis. You know, what's interesting is that.
The time of World War Two, when Hitler understood the importance geostrategically of trying to control the Ukraine and to push back on Russia, the Galen network of Reinhard Galen and other Nazis had actually trained and set up a lot of the intelligence and black ops structures in these areas. And this ties into NATO's Gladio operations. And what's amazing is that those networks then were sort of taken over by the West. We all know about Operation paper Clip,
but people like Dulles and others Bill Donovan. They also made alliances with these Galen networks that are still running things, still doing these operations in the Ukraine. So it's amazing all the posturing in the West about being everybody who's not for total liberalism as a Nazi, and yet we're openly supporting and aiding, openly take pictures with Nazi battalions in the Ukraine, the real actual Nazis. And I mean, this is just absurd levels of stupidity and hypocrisy, and
it's just it's kind of amazing to me. And people think that this is some kind of based red pill thing.
It's not.
It's a completely controlled and manipulated operation and it has nothing really to do with these ideologies other than that these are control groups that are controlled by Western intelligence to engage in irregular warfare, to engage in proxy warfare, to destabilize and to restructure and destroy areas to fit them into not the American century. Do people understand that all these boomers and Cold War people think, well, we're more fat to communists, We're going to keep the KG being Russia.
How do Ukraine?
No, it's not the American century anymore. Do you understand that that was a con and maybe there could have been an American Century that wasn't a con.
And I don't know, but all the people who came up with the idea of.
The American Century, the State Department, George Keenan, that was all dreamt up by the CFR and nineteen thirty nine War and Peace Studies Project from the New York City Council on Foreign Relations. That's when they created. Right after that, the un right right at that time. And so this idea of fostering democracy, fostering free market liberalism, which is not really what it was, that was for the fortune one hundred, fortune five hundred to go into these countries
and restructure them, to loot them. So again, does that make the Cold War iron curtain? Does that make them good?
No?
But is it possible that we have turned into a worse thing. That's what I'm trying to pose it to you. And the more that I read about the Stars and the KGB and all this stuff and how awful they were, all the awful stuff that they did to people in these books, I'm just reminded of. But aren't the global elite that run things now like ten times worse? Are they doing ten times worse things? Isn't what they want to set up with every area of your life?
Tract and trace a ten times worse version of all that stuff seems like it to me.
And while it's true that communism had this ridiculous idealistic system that was based around everyone being essentially sacrificed to the collective and to this bizarre technocratic atheistic system, that was an older technocratic model that has caved to a
new technocratic model. If you remember the way that Brazenski and Brezenski, the way that bertrand Russell and ah c Wells these different, these big level strategies, the way they talked about communism and socialism and Marsam was as if they were experiments in other countries to see how well they functioned, how well they worked as control mechanisms in other areas and for certain people. And not every system works that well to control everybody equally, because different regions,
different people groups require different strategies. That's why the CAA studies ethnography to master the local customs and idiosyncrasies of various peoples to best influence and control them.
And so.
Do we understand what's going on really that it's and it's doesn't mean that Russia is a representation of authentic, pure, one hundred percent accurate Christianity. There's absolutely corruption in Eastern Bloc countries. There's absolutely corruption in the Russian government, sure, but that's everywhere. And if you listen to putent speech, what did Putins say about what Russia represents?
It's the representation of a system that I didn't completely get destroyed.
In the post Cold World period, in the World War two and post Cold War period. In other words, there's a representation of the maintenance of people and their faith and their tradition and that they don't want enforced Satanism.
And even if.
Putin is some villain or something, which he just seems to be a pragmatic global leader like anyone else. Right, People always ask me all the time, what do you think about Putin? What do you think about Elon Musk? What do you think about Donald Trump? I don't know. I don't have any thoughts other than I like it when they do something good, and if they do something bad, I disagree. So there's no pipe dreams about, you know, some utopia that's going to be created in some other country.
But there is the reality of Western elites being completely maniacal, completely out of touch with the reality, the completely I mean, it's people like brazent Ski and Kissinger and Bill Gates and and Klaus Schwab and George Soros, and I mean they brag about what they're doing. They're one hundred percent
into Malthusianism. But even the Soviets weren't maniocal Malthusians, right, They had ridiculous things like Lysinkoism and these stupid philosophies, and they would they was certainly killing and starve off people who oppose.
Them, but.
Hourly who by the way, supported all those ideas, now want something ten times worse than that. Do you understand how crazy that is? And now we're at the point where it's like, oh, yeah, now we need to nuke, we need to we need to blow everything up, destroy everything. These lunatics like Sean Penn, Let's nuke everybody, Let's nuke these whole all of those blow up everything up.
I mean, I can't imagine that these people, I mean.
It's almost as if they're completely taken over by something else, something else was running them.
And they just have this innate thirst for the.
Destruction of cities, the destruction of countries, the destruction of what they think is their enemy. Like the view Heartbeat saying that everybody in the Midwest deserves to be destroyed because.
That state went for Trump. That's crazy.
But we see the spirit that motivates somebody like that can't be good. That is a demonic spirit. And so this whole Cold War situation and where we're going is not random conflicts. This is all drawn up by the Rancorporation, drawn up by these entities created out of the same network that I'm talking about, the deep state.
And by the way, it's great that Trump called out Victoria, Newland.
That's that's I mean, that's who has been pushing this for all this time, trying to provoke this conflict, trying to provoke Russia for all these years, back to twenty fourteen and all the way back to the eighties with the Color revolutions. But if Rand Corporation was drawing up these strategies in these plans decades ago, then how can it be the fault of countries that just want to preserve what they are in their way of life? And Ukraine is not a historic nation state. It's part of Russia.
So of course they want Ukraine. Why wouldn't they win. That is the heart of Russia. Kiev is the heart of Russia, and breaking it off is a Western imperial strategy going all the way back to World War One. So you have to understand that this is a bigger game that's being played. And it doesn't mean that Russia or any of these other countries is a perfect utopia. It means that they represent things that stand in the way of the advance of total technocracy and total malthusiaan depopulation.
Sometime you got So's Jay Di or jays analysis.
We were talking about what emerged out of the Cold War dialectic and what the long term plan was, and the long term plan is now completely evident.
Right again, I think we could give.
Some leeway to people in the fifties, sixties, seventies, you know, living in the time of the Cold War. They didn't have access to the information, they didn't have access to what we have access to now, and so a lot
of good people, including my family members. I had family members that fought for the West and were Cold warriors that engaged in Cold War activities for the Air Force, for example, And so you know, it has nothing to do with I want to pick some side because to have this idealistic view that somehow there's going to be this future or is itox Christian empire, or that Russia is going to save the world or something like that. Now, maybe Russia saves the world by and I don't know.
I mean, things are getting so crazy, who knows. But I don't think that salvation or anything like that comes necessarily from a nation state per se. But God can providentially use situations like this to stave off completely demonized structures that are openly everybody can see what's being promoted by the Western elite now and one hundred percent this is a global agenda. They want to push this everywhere. And so what's happening is the removal of potential areas
of resistance. And that's not just the Ukraine conflict that also is domestically in the West. It's anybody in the in the Western countries that potentially could stand up to or oppose a threat. That's why there are these long term operations to demographically destroy different areas and regions. It's an open stated thing there's a book called Weapons of Mass Migration by Kelly green Hill. It's a I think it's a Stanford University publication. I think it's connected to
the Army War College. It's about warfare with population. But you can't talk about that because that makes you a bad person, even though it's a public fact that it's a real strategy of warfare, and that's too weaken and destroy to integrate into this coming global government. So the danger is that now that we're reaching this coming to a head, and now we have Zelenski and others threatening
World War III, if there's a union between Russia and China. Again, keep in mind that doesn't make any of these powers necessarily the good guys. And my point is that, as I was pointing out with the Bond film Tomorrow Never Dies, there's a lot of other movies that have the same kind of plot going on. Think about X Men, the one with Michael Fassman where he's Magneto. You have this elite group that's trying to kick off a nuclear exchange
between the East and the West. Think about war Games where an Ai tries to kick off this global world war between the East and the West. Think about tomorrow never dies where an elite group is trying to cause an instantiate in an act that war between the East
and the West. And so I think that there is a desire on the part of some of the more demonically energized elites in the West that they would be happy to see full on total war, because eventually what happens is that these people are so given over to evil that they're not even in control of their own faculties anymore. They lose their own reasoning faculty, and they become essentially unionize united with evil powers, and by doing so,
they're not in control. They're not steering anymore. They're steered by something else. And what is it that all these people want to enact. They want to enact a new order and new aon, a new era that is posthuman. Every one of the global elite that we've analyzed in terms of their books, they're all one hundred percent on the same page when it comes to this. None of them disagree. There are no pro human, pro life global elites.
You understand that, none of them. There are none of them who disagree with a global government, who disagree with a global single CBDC currency, The bis guy, the Triple Chin guy just came out again and said FIAT has won. It is beaten bigcoin, which is laughable. He says that we will have this CBDC. We will have it and will shut your wallets off. You will be under total control for anything you say.
That's esg.
This technocratic system was designed out of rand CIA World War two Cold War operations studying all of the conflicts to figure out the best techniques and mechanisms to control and manage populations through tech through smart cities. For example, in the Phoenix Program book that we analyzed by Doug Valentine, we learned that FEMA and Homeland Security were set up on the models of the Phoenix Program and on the
models of Vietnam and population reorganization studies. We learned that in Vietnam a lot of the AI and drone technology was first tested out in.
The Vietnam conflict.
We learned that DARPA and the Pentagon were strategizing and testing out vas techniques for masses of population tracking and control in Vietnam and subsequent conflicts as well. Right Desert Storm, we know that people were beginning to be biometrically tracked and traced even at the time of desert storm in the Iraq conflict. And so these power structures are the same power structures that control the global drug trade.
Do you think that these are good people? They're controlling the global drug trade.
And the insane explosion of heroin production since.
The last ten to fifteen twenty years.
Look at our country being destroyed by legal heroin opioids and illegal opioids.
That's because the.
Western power structure took over all of the drug networks and lanes in the last fifty sixty years. And they did that in concert with aligning themselves organized crime, as multiple analysts have pointed out, even from the FBI itself, right FBI consultant Paul Williams Ciaoss, they took over all of the old drug networks, drug lanes. And what I'm trying to say is that this is what it means to have full spectrum dominance. To have full spectrum control, is to control all these areas of life.
They're not doing it because it's just a hobby.
It's fun to do, to study. Oh, we're nerds. No, it's about what they are bringing in. Do you understand this is not This is a real plan. It's not theories. I wonder what they're going to do. I mean, they all put in.
Their books what they're going to do.
It's not guesswork. Now, how they roll this out is guesswork. We don't know what cards these people are going to play. A lot of people didn't know for sure, or we didn't know they were going to have this COVID all this kind of stuff that rolled out. But then after it happens, we look back and we can say, oh, they're running all these drolls for the exact same thing. Crimson Contagient, Clayed X spars document event to A one, and we can see that this is a strategized, rolled
out plan. It's the same with all these Rank Corporation documents that have been mentioning, all these white papers that plan the future, that plan and strategize a global conflict as one of the cards that can be played. Literally Rand Corporation strategies about a war between Russia and the West. Nuclear stranges right PDD sixty or whatever it is Presidential Decision Directive under Clinton of absorbing a nuclear strike, which supposedly has.
Been updated or whatever.
I don't know all the PDDs, but the point is that you do have strategies about this, and none of those strategies are.
Made with your welfare in mind.
Because the same people that run giant drug laundering banks like HSBC and all these other banks that got busted ten years ago for three hundred million dollars worth of drug money. You think that's just random bad apples. No, that's the people that run the West. That's the same structure, the same people that we're talking about. It's Specter and Spector would like to see a destructive war probably eventually. It's definitely one of the cards that they could play.
I mean, I hope there's not going to be a world war, but they could definitely play that card. They have talked and strategized about it for a long time, the possibility of a new world war.
Now it's more likely than ever.
It's being talked about openly, and if it happens, it would be because the elite want that to happen, to have a mass destruction, to bring in their post human world where we're run.
By AI, we're run in some kind of new.
Technocratics system where everything is tracked and traced. Maybe the elite emerged from underground bunkers after a giant exchange. Who knows, but that's definitely one of the cards that they could play. We have to keep that in mind. And another pandemic is another card they could play. They could play both cards. So we have to be prepared for these things because
these are realities. That's the world that we live in, and if we don't realize what's going on, it's just going to be all the worse for us.
Do you want to get my books? Go to Jay's Analysis.
You can buy my books in the shop signed copies. You can follow me over on rockfin as well and get all those products there. And the Tip of the Spear