Actors emerging that will be the new locusts of power as we go into the future. And it's going to be totally accurate about this because some of these new power structures that emerged will be corporations, and therese corporations will arise that will be more powerful than nation state. Now we're not at the point yet where there's a single global corp that runs everything, but we're definitely moving in
that direction. I think everybody can see this when we look out the way that big food, for example, is being more and more consolidated under a couple, you know, big Agra companies. The drugs are being consolidated under a few mega pharmaceutical corporations. Media as being consolidated under a handful of mega media corporations, and that same trend will probably continue until we get corporations that may end up being more powerful than any existing nation state today. Now that's
a long way away, but it's definitely possible given where we're going. And so he says power nations is something that was considered beneficial in the older order. Now power over the outcomes of events is considered more important, and that's because of the rise of new actors that we've never seen before, and that is the international corporate structure. He says, this is creating a more and more the interdependent world. And that's what monopoly capitalism intended on creating. With
completely open borders, completely free trade. This was to create and erect this totally interlinked global economy. Don't go anywhere. This is the Junger guests Jay Dyer as we break down soft Power from the elite themselves. Welcome back to the show. This is your guest host of Jayson Analysis. As you know, I weekly lecture through the writings of the global elite to give you a inside understanding directly from their really boring long terms and texts. I do your
homework for you. Nobody else wants to read these books. Hardly anybody but the global elite actually read these books. And I read them so then I can digest it and tell you exactly what the plans are. And it's always important to look back at the plans that they wrote one hundred fifty thirty years ago. And today I want to highlight an important paper that was written in terms of international relations and American geopolitical strategy, and it is called soft Power
by Joseph ny junior. He is of course one of the Kennedy School of Government Harvard Rhodes Scholarship guys, so we know he's coming out of the circles
of Auxord University. This will be essentially people promoting the Rhodes, Millner rathchildhood cetera worldview, because typically people on the Eastern Seaboard elite universities Harvard, Yale, Cambridge are seeing me a Princeton and then you know they go over to Oxford and Cambridge in the UK they get sort of co opted into or sort of coaxed into the two fake arms of the establishment at a higher geo political
levels. So just like in the US we have the fake left right Democrat Republican idea, in terms of global geopolitics, there's a similar kind of dialectic between older strategies of Fabian socialism that was so called liberal elitism in the UK and then a more right wing supposed opposition to that. Have an actual fact the elites above that we're funding both sides of the false left right dialectic in
the UK as well. These international leader also allied with the internationalist from the from the American power structure, and this would of course, be the JP Morgan's, the Rock and Feller power structure, et cetera. And so out of this sphere we get a lot of people who are ideal logs and who are the brains, right, not so much the we got the banks, we got the corporations, and we got the brains. And the brains would be the people like the brazil Skis and the Kissingers. And we could count
Joseph ny in this category of global elite writers. And so he wrote. He was actually listed by Foreign Policy magazine in twenty eleven is one of the top global thinkers in the world. And why is that? Well, he wrote this famous paper right after the Cold War was winding down in nineteen ninety. It's called soft power. Soft power is important because it's one of the
key strategies that the elite have used for a long time. It's really a Fabian socialist strategy, but it doesn't it's not restricted to people of that ideology can be used by anybody. And it's really crucial to understand because it's part of cultural warfare. You know, I've talked for a long time about how toxic culture and culture warfare is crucial to how the agenda marches forward despite whoever's in public office, and that's because the agenda is planned at a higher level
by think tanks, NGOs and international corporations and organizations. This is admitted in this essay, so you understand that this is not a conspiracy text. This is a text from people in the Harvard circle. Harvard had a huge role, for example, in the looting of Russia when the Soviet Union collapsed.
You had a lot of oligarchs who then sort of auctioned off in a fire sale a lot of the assets of Russia when the Soviet Union collapse, and that was all done by design, and some of the architects of that were at Harvard University. So what does he mean by soft power? Why is
this so crucial to understanding how the global elite worked. Well, he's surprisingly at the time when he wrote this in nineteen ninety, you would think you would be writing about the Soviet Union declining, but in fact he writes about the United States in decline. And that's because the Cold War really had this strategy, this endgame that was long term in terms of the global government. A lot of people think that the Cold War was just about defeating evil atheism
and communism. But actually it was about a long term game that some of the higher level stratagists had for bringing about the marriage of East and West into a third way or what the Fabians called the New World Order. Yes, actually that term the New World Order was coined by famous Fabians like H.
G. Wells. Now again, Fabians economics doesn't restrict itself to somebody who's an outright Marxist socialist, because as we know from a lot of the writings that I've covered, and including Quigly Professor Anthony Sutton or Joan rots You that I recently been lecturing through and his really copiously but noted books, we know that the game plan for Fabian socialist for an international order is identical to the
game plan for the monopoly capitalist international order. And that's because Fabian socialism slow kill Marxism, in other words, had the exact same funding as the people who are pushing monopoly capitalism control. So in other words, it's the same ideology. They might differ at times on how to get there, but it's the same end goal. And essentially this is going to be admitted and demonstrated. In Nia's own essay, he doesn't mention fabianism, but he doesn't have
to because it's all the same plan. It's all the plan for a world order structured around a global currency, a global government, and the removal of the existing nation state firewall, and the removal of the existing currencies that will put us into this debt based international credit system, something like fedcoins, something like CBDC whatever wherever it goes, we don't know yet. But they're already now beginning to talk about the very things that these people said one hundred years
ago. Remember Bergend Russell talking about the credit system, h Wells talking about the credit system, the universal basic income system that would be rolled out, And here we are on a hundred years later, and it's being rolled out. Nye says that really the breakdown of the existing order after the Renaissance is due to the world wars of the twentieth century. This is the same analysis that quickly has that World War one, two and the Cold War really break
down all of the previous existing international orders. And this includes the notion of traditional warfare breaking down. So this is kind of warfare that it is exercised primarily through external power or through actual force, is being replaced by a multipolar supposed order that will be centered around what he calls soft power that is influencing nations and power blocks through non warfare means, you know, not actual warfare,
but through culture, for example. So he says that the Cold War saw not just a decline of the US but also the decline of Russia as well. And he says that there are new actors emerging that will be the new locusts of power as we go into the future. And it's going to be totally accurate about this because some of these new power structures that emerged will be corporations, and therese corporations will arise that will be more powerful than nation
state. Now we're not at the point yet where there's a single global corp that runs everything, but we're definitely moving in that direction. I think everybody can see this when we look out the way that big food, for example, is being more and more consolidated under a couple you know, big Agra
companies. The drugs are being consolidated under a few mega pharmaceutical corporations. Media as being consolidated under a handful of mega media corporations, and that same trend will probably continue until we get corporations that may end up being more powerful than any existing nation state today. Now that's a long way away, but it's definitely possible given where we're going. And so he says, power over nations
is something that was considered beneficial in the older order. Now power over the outcomes of events is considered more important, and that's because of the rise of new actors that we've never seen before, and that is the international corporate structure. He says, this is creating a more and more the interdependent world.
And that's what monopoly capitalism intended on creating. With completely open borders, completely free trade, this was to create and erect this totally interlinked global economy. Don't go anywhere. This is the ounounger guests was Jay Dyer, as we break down soft power from the elite themselves. Welcome back to the show. We are breaking down the crucial geopolitical essay which is now a little bit dated, but it's very important to understand in terms of getting how we got to
where we are now. And this is the nineteen ninety essay by Joseph and I called soft Power talks about how the world was constructed into an interdependent free market in a sense of free trade global order. Right. I'm not talking about legitimate free market capitalism. I'm talking about monopoly capitalism that engineers ways to construct an international global order for the benefit of a choice elect our choice,
select small percentage of oligarchs. That's the real world that we're living in now,
and it's totally compatible with the Fabian socialist model of collectivism. If you remember in nineteen eighty four, when Winston is looking into the counter the movement that he thinks is against the establishment, right Goldstein, and he thinks the gold Scene has written this book the Theory and Practice of Old Gartical Collectivism and how you fight against this and how you, you know, beat the establishment.
In reality we find out that there was no gold Scene. He was a completely made up creature, cut out a kind of a bin laden type of character. And in reality the writing was actually written by O'Brien, Right, The Theory and Practice of Old garchtical Collectivism and how to Defeat it whatever. The revolutionary propaganda was created by the guy running the big brother system.
And this is in Orwell's novel intentionally meant to characterize Fabian socialism. He is writing about Bernard Shaw, Lord Milner and all of the Fabian elites that we're pushing and moving written into a slow version of socialism, which is almost completely where they've gone now. They've almost completely adopted a kind of Fabian model, and this is not even hidden anymore. In fact, they've had many you know, Tony Blair for example, as an open supporter of the Fabian society.
And that doesn't mean that their fake right wing opponents are actually against Fabianism. They're actually part of the same supra international structure which is allied with zillion zillion zillion dollar, mega mega mega capitalism. That's the reality of the world. And when you read these kinds of books you start to figure that out.
And these writings by for example, Nie so Ni goes back to the how we got to where we were in his day in the nineties by talking about the seventies and the eighties and how international corporations were really coming into into power, into focus by taking over various markets, and he talks about how one of the things that we saw at this time heare, was economic warfare.
Economic warfare became became a key element in the global elites attack on other countries, and he says that international agencies then stepped up to be engaged in this economic warfare kind of a predecessor to cybersecurity at this time. And this says, these international agencies became elements and corporations became elements of soft power.
Power shifted away from the balance of powers in the Cold War to this new structure where there's an interdependence in the whole world, which was the purpose of the Cold War was to create this interdependent neoliberal order that could then transition into a new phase, which will become the War on Terror, and that will become where we are now all this new type of war. Isn't it convenient? The war on terror just kind of went away. There's nobody question why
it is that the terrorists just suddenly stopped being terrorists. Are we supposed to actually believe that that was because Obama and Joe Biden defeated the terrorists and defeated al Qaeda and ISIS and all this nonsense, right, that's those are all cut out puppets in my view, that the West actually runs anyway, And he hints at that in this an assessa. He hints he hints that, you know, if you think about the War on Terror, you know this
was basically the holdovers from Brazinski's Mujahad Dean allies. Right, so the sign us the Soviet war in Afghanistan, this is Brazinski's secret base as it was called, which is really just the the names of those who were in al Qaeda. That becomes the locusts of the war on Terror in the supposed bad once again. But this interdependent order really was itself managed at the higher levels
on the basis of private banks and massive debt. And so if you remember back in the two thousand and eight crisis, a lot of writers were talking Peter Shift, Tom Woods, people out of the Austrian the Austrian school of economics, and the people who are more libertarian minded were actually and there a lot of them were correct about how this was all scams and debt bubbles within
debt bubbles within debt bubbles, and this was all done by design. So you have to understand that they will run up debt on purpose to destroy and tank the economy as a way to siphon off people's energy. Right, because money, in my view, is really just a symbol for energy over time, and how to store energy, and so they will siphon off people's energy and put the nation into insurmountable debt on purpose. This is an actual strategy
to destroy the existing system. And it goes by a lot of different names. There's a lot of different theorist Plowered and Piven that Alex talks about a lot. But also the Fabians had this idea too of promoting anything that runs up debt and outlandish taxes because what this does is this supposedly will disrupt the corporate in their view, the capitalist system. Now it's not actually disrupting capitalism.
It's really just fostering monopoly capitalism's oligarchical designs, as they're allied with Marxist socialist collectivism. So he now goes on to say that debt and the private banks are really the key to the new power structure and the corporations as well. And he says that actual warfare is very, very costly, so we don't really need to engage in a whole lot of actual warfare anymore. He says that now we're going into an age where we're going to be involved in
ideological warfare and soft power. Now it's true that we can still have real war. Right, Obviously, the possibility of real war can break out. But what he's describing is the next several decades, right where we didn't have other than the War on Terror, which was more of an ideological war. Right, there wasn't a whole lot of I mean, there was conflicts in Persian golf, there were conflicts in you know, areas like Syria, but we haven't seen a full on global war on terror the way that we saw
World War two or something like that. So the Cold War, which was much more of an ideological managed conflict, is the was the model for the kinds of warfare that we're in now. Right, These managed ideological conflicts, which are mass examples of soft power. The interconnectedness of communications which was built as a result of the Cold War, is what we'll put us into a
situation of it already existing proto global government. These are the same people again who are the architect of the League of Nations, which gave way to the United Nations, which is going to give away to you know, it may become the future world government. Who knows, but that's always by the way, what the Fabian socialists themselves pushed, they wanted, they were behind the
League of Nations and the United Nations explicitly openly. This was all at the behest of Lord Milner, the Astors and other people who, according to Quickly and the people that we talk about, literally bankrolled and funded and promoted all this through the ivy legal institutions, universities on the Eastern seaboard and in the UK. And so you'll notice the professor n I went and studied under these institutions and has this approach to geopolitic. He goes on to say that the
real future will be private power and not public government power. Governments essentially are going to be more or less owned by the private corporate powers. He says that in nineteen fifty three, he says, you can see an example of this kind of strategy you through the CIA's ousting of Mosa Deck to install the Shaw. And by the way, this is interesting because that wasn't yet declassified as an actual CI operation at the time that now I wrote this. But
of course he assumes that people reading his writings already know this. So something that was called a conspiracy theory, you know, all the way up until not too many years ago, was a kind of common knowledge amongst people writing at this level as what we should pay attention to. Here he goes on and said, well, what are the dangers that we'll see as we come
out of the Cold War and enter into this new phase. He said, We're gonna see rogue states, international actors that are at rogue so called we don't really know what that is. Basically, that's just anybody that's not involved in their debt based banking scam. That's a book rogue nation or a rogue individual. And I think we're seeing that now with the attitude of the West towards towards Russia, for example, that would be considered a rogue actor,
rogue state. And he says that the international corporate we'll have to put in play structures that are international to combat these rogue actors. Welcome back to the I'm your guest, hosts, Jay Dyer. You know, I was just thinking about the products that I really enjoyed from the store. I would remind you that it's absolutely necessary to support Alex and the and everybody over there by going to the store and loading up on those those products right now, for
example, the uh, the Nason iodine. I've been taking that every morning for the last I don't know, about two weeks, and you will immediately feel energized, like there's like this this numbness, like this this you get this uh my, my, my lips get numb in a good way, and then I'm like super energized for the next four hours. So I don't know what the nason Idon actually is doing to me, but it's definitely making me. It feels like, I don't know, some sort of weird superpower
that is coursing through my veins. And I guarantee you're gonna love it if you get into Also, I'm a big fan of the coral calcium. That's that's one of our favorites here. Jamie likes it too, so definitely get over there. There's a lot of books over there too that are great, a lot of DVDs, a lot of excellent T shirts, so definitely support them. It's crucial. We don't want this going away. This is really
having a huge effect. And just give you an example. Let's if we can't play this clip of a Dutch politician very recently laying down the Chad law with a bunch of globalist goons. I couldn't believe this when I saw it. If you can't see the clip, If you can't see the clip, it's got I think dubbed below it. There's because he's speaking of Dutch. Obviously I don't know Dutch, but this is a YouTube clip. You guys have that Hey loo ver on their vase and door Mark Sisto hold stand and
he mentions the secret cop some woman who's politicians. She says that this was a tool for Western secret societies or secret services, I should say, recruiting people into the global elite. And then the rest of the uh, the bass bitch women say, don't say this, don't talk about that baseless conspiracy. Well's not, it's a fact. So you noticed that even politicians are
figuring out the stuff that we talk about. And this guy just total chat, just doesn't care, charges forward with pointing out out these secret intelligence service recruits people into the global elite structure from these universities. And what do they do do they refute him? No, they get up and walk out. Deep So if you're not involved in this, why are you acting guilty? Are you gonna be a walking out with all of her goon politicians with her?
And then he just keeps on total chat energy, not even because we know that this is a criminal ideology said that fought at these Western universities, and it's the same ideology that birthed the revolutions of the communists, and now it's morphed into cultural Marxism, which he's completely correct about. And Martin and
then the whole group, they just all walk out. The whole cabinet gets up and walks out, and he calls them out and he says, well, it's not an accident that she went and studied at Oxford and came back basically a fabian socialists. This is everything that I've been telling you. And he says, she was recruited for this international deep state. So politicians the
world over are beginning to figure this out. And it's the very thing that as we're gonna close here with the rest of nine, the very thing that n I talked about at the global policy level. None of this is conspiracy. It's only conspiracy to get you to not think about it or talk about it. That's just to keep the normis and the dumbed down people from actually rubbing their two brain cells together and figure out, hey, wait a minute,
we're being scammed at an international level. It's not the Libs, it's an international oligarchic zillionaire elite. In fact, now I goes on to say that the new threat he's talking about the future world rogue states, and what global warming. So he goes immediately to the global warming scam. That will be the new international threat, he says. International institutions, he says, must now come up to the stage, the international stage, because they must
ex world control for the information age that is emerging. He was learning this in nineteen ninety. Predicting the information age. The international institutions, he says, must step to the four. Remember he mentioned cybersecurity, so it's basically predicting cyber censoring back in nineteen ninety. He says that as debt increases, amongst the debt debts increase somebout the debt bubble, as the international institution stepped
to the four. He says that as debt comes about and crashes the economies, he says, what will be the focus is culture war. He says culture war. He says psychological operations will be crucial right in controlling this new global order. He says that it will be a battle of world views in the Information as info War, as Alex accurately fitled his his site many many
years ago, again fits perfectly with what Naia is talking about. He says that we're gonna have to have these new institutions that will police the world. And he says that the US Empire will face a choice just like the British Empire faced in the nineteenth century, right when it was coming and beginning to wane. Now the US Empire will begin to wane. And what will step
into the place if the US Empire declines and collapses. We he says, we're going to need an international body that steps up, something like the United Nations. And he says, how will they exercise and bring about this new global culture UNESCO United Nations Educational Social Cultural Organization, which, as we know, the philosophy of UNESCO is written by Julian Huxley, a book that we've lectured through the entire text here on alex is a program, and also over
on my channel and on my rock Fan. We've gone through all of these texts again and we're doing another new one today that just backs up everything. How will this be brought about? Well, what means will UNESCO use to bring about a global culture that will destroy the existing cultures and move everybody into a global culture TV shows, Hollywood, he says, will promote and create a global culture, that lobo culture will be the basis for the new international
order. By the way, this is the exact same thing that the Fabians the socialists said would occur one hundred years prior to Ni writing this. Right, they said Shaw and others said Bernard Shaw, and others said Milner. These people said in the nineteen teens, twenties and thirties that debased, degenerate global sex culture, for example, not just that, but all kinds of
other things would be the basis for the new global order. They said that in the twenties and thirties they were talking about the free love in the teens, twenties and thirties. The Fabian socialists way ahead of the time. And then we get this really crazy statement at the end of NIE's essay where he
says, well, how are we going to combat this? He says, the nations as they are, the US, need to spend exorbitant amounts of money spin spin spin others, quantitative easing the money printer go right, make them money better, And then he says, introduce tons of new taxes. So more debt and more taxes are the answer. Well, why would that be the answer. Well, that's the answer if you have the design of
destroying the existing system to bring in the new great reset global system. And he says that the post Cold War era will bring about the new world order, the new challenges of the transnational interdependence, he says, will emerge out of the Cold War, which is a managed dialect. I made a video of music. It's my new single. I just dropped my new single where I'm mocking the soy culture, the very soft power literally soft power soy culture
that we have promoted by the elites. And I don't know if you have that. It's my funco pop song. If you want to play that's it's a bank. It's gonna be number one on the Billboard charts. So uh is that acceptable? Fuck up? Fuck up? Bu fuck up? Fuck up? I got married. I got married to a funk fuck so we got wedded. Come joint in the subway shop. I am married. I'm married to a fogoper. We got joined. Go watch to see the subway shop pitiments and biscuits and minerals. They come to eat the two. My
whole life is spent watching on the two. Up Up up war. I'm married to a Fogo. We got worded, but we got joined in a subway shop. Wors a middle They come to me through you, vitamins and middle les. They come from me through this year to ful fu fuckful. I got married. I got married to my phone gober who we got wedded? Who we got joined in the subway? Shot love their sight, none ofthir sight? What should I do with none of their sight? And put
it in my hand, throw it on the ground. Who knows just what I do? So we comebded, come joint, Give us somewayy shock the or