Libya with Andrew - podcast episode cover

Libya with Andrew

Apr 28, 202625 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Andrew and James talk about the revolution and civil war in Libya, and discuss the campist approach to world affairs.

Sources:

Iran retaliation: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjrqqd8lw2wo

Timeline of Libyan History: https://www.britannica.com/place/Libya/History

Timeline of Libyan revolt: https://www.britannica.com/event/Libya-Revolt-of-2011

Behind the NTC: http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1062/2/who-drove-the-libyan-uprising

Consequences and Motivations of Libya intervention: https://jacobin.com/2015/02/libya-intervention-nato-imperialism

https://web.archive.org/web/20220517202837/https://merip.org/2011/11/was-the-libya-intervention-necessary/

https://jacobin.com/2021/03/nato-libya-war-uk-us-france-regime-change

https://jacobin.com/2011/09/libya-and-the-left

Rebel abuses: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-14891913

Targeting of Black Libyans and Migrants: https://www.npr.org/2011/10/20/141549384/blacks-and-migrants-targets-of-attack-in-libya

Displacement numbers in 2012: https://www.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/legacy-pdf/4ec23100b.pdf

Consequences of first civil war: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/24/libya-capital-under-islamist-control-tripoli-airport-seized-operation-dawn

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/2/16/libya-anniversary-the-situation-is-just-terrible

An attempt at unification: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/17/libyan-politicians-sign-un-peace-deal-unify-rival-governments

El Sharara oilfield situation: https://middle-east-online.com/node/708060

The status quo as of 2020: https://www.politico.eu/article/the-libyan-conflict-explained/

Another attempt at unification: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/3/15/libya-interim-government-sworn-in-replacing-rival-administration

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/9/21/libya-parliament-withdraws-confidence-from-unity-government

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/3/3/un-voices-concern-over-vote-on-new-libyan-prime-minister

Morality police: https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/fears-religious-freedom-libya-proposes-new-morality-police

Slave auction: https://africasacountry.com/2017/11/the-slave-auction-in-libya

Libya’s arms in regional instability: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-libya-arms-un-idUSBRE93814Y20130409/

Natural disaster: https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2024/09/year-rebuilding-libyas-flood-hit-derna-plagued-politics

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/libya-floods-derna-turkish-firm-said-repaired-dam-did-it

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Speaker 1

Media, so by the time you hear this, the situation may have evolved in any number of directions. I'm speaking in the immediate wake of the United States and Israel's brutal invasion of Iran. Thus far, over one thousand have been killed, including over one hundred school children and the

Supreme leader of Iran, Ayatola Ali Kameni. In response to this Americans really aggression, Iran has retaliated by targets in both American bases and civilian and energy infrastructure in the neighboring countries that have facilitated American presence in the region.

With the strategically and economically critical straight off moods in jeopardy, with France, the UK, and Germany aka the usual suspects indicating potential involvement, and with the potential Russian and Chinese involvement also being floated in some circles, it seems to me that without any formal annow spun, the war on the world has escalated potentially to a point of no return. Hello, and welcome to it could happen here. I'm Andrew Sage andrewism on YouTube, and I'm joined again by.

Speaker 2

It's James Hi Andrew, how are you doing.

Speaker 1

As well as I can be?

Speaker 2

Yeah? That's about the best we can hopeful these days, isn't it.

Speaker 3

Yeah?

Speaker 1

And in a time like this, I want to take a look back at history, particularly how past US interventions have left devastation in their week. Today, I want to look at the fate of Libya, a country still dealing with his simmer intentions following the end of the post intervention civil war. So I suppose we should begin in mid February in twenty eleven, and the Arab of Spring

was sweeping the Middle East and North Africa. Among the countries caught up in the fuva against the prevailing states was Libya, a North African state ruled for the previous forty two years by the Colonel Mumar Algernife's government. Masses had taken to the streets across the country, starting in Benghazi. The government had some successors in putting down the revolt, killing hundreds of rebels demonstrators alike, and some failures as

the masses managed to hold position. The people had many motivations, spaning Islamist, democratic, to militant, to tribal to just disaffected against a government intent on its continued survival, revolutions, uprisings, protests, revolts, they tend to be messy affairs. I'm sure James, you're well away of that.

Speaker 2

Yeah. Yeah.

Speaker 3

I think it's really easy of like outside observers or when we're looking back at history to be like, oh, this revolution was an Islamist revolution, this was the Marxist learning this revolution, this one was an anarchist revolution. But every revolution that I have been at the have like witnessed happening. It's in everything revolution and it starts and

it later becomes a something revolution. But especially in the Arab Spring, right like in that time, it was just like we've had enough of being under the boot of these regimes and it was extraordinarily heterodox and that was quite beautiful in the early.

Speaker 1

Days exactly exactly. The heterodox nature of revolution is really what I want to drill here, because I think it's very easy people to caricaturize and sleep up broad brush and its determine oh this is and it gets to be around people are saying, oh, it's only monarchists, it's monarchists and Zionists going out in the streets when they were protesting, when the situation on the ground is always more complex than that.

Speaker 3

Yeah, maybe I'll just take a second to address the annoying campus tendency. I understand that every time the United States rained down death on some part of the world, it's terrible, right, it's sad, as you just said, Andrew. And we've seen a girls' school bombed not once but twice, it seems right, what they call a double attack. That doesn't mean that your response has to be to support the other people who are killing those same civilians in that same place. It is possible for two things to

be bad. And like in Iran, yeah, there is a monarchist opposition.

Speaker 2

It sucks. I spoke just this morning to a Kurdish.

Speaker 3

Group which is opposing the regime in Iran, and they had nothing but bad things to say about the monarchists. Right, they said, this is the PAK write the Kurdistan Freedom Party I'm quoting here. They do not have a foothold in society to actually achieve anything. The lies and delusions of a group of people sitting in nightclubs cannot make any real impact. That You're free to use that one next time someone tells you all the opposition in Iran is monarchist.

Speaker 2

It's nonsense exactly.

Speaker 1

I mean, just it on its face as obviously nonsense. This notion that these people are hive minds. It's hilariousist notion that you see popping up again and again.

Speaker 2

Yeah, very orientalist.

Speaker 1

Yeah. Anytime people step outside and they have something that they're upset about, they just get labeled with this one broad sweeping ideological monarcha, whether they snubscribe to it or not. Yeah, And even within the ideological monarchers, there's always a lot of nuance and how people understand those ideologies. You know, No, to Islamists are necessarily alike. No, two monarchists evan are necessarily alike. And those are both ideologies that I absolutely abhor.

Speaker 3

You know right, Yeah, I don't understand how you can be a leftist and spend your life like as such and then also think that in other parts of the world people don't want the same things like I believe it is inherently human, yeah, to want dignity and respect and the same for others, and to want our communities

to govern themsels elves. And I don't believe that it's any less human if you live in North Africa or the Middle East or South Africa, or an island in the Caribbean, or an island in a Pacific, like I believe, it comes from our human nature, and so it strikes me is therefore obvious that there cannot be a country where people's human nature is fundamentally distinct and they're all just like knee jerk monarchists.

Speaker 2

I wouldn't see the world the way I see it if I was able to believe that.

Speaker 1

Yeah. Yeah, these movements, they're always composed by the choices and actions of sometimes millions of people, each of their own motivations. And that's easy, particularly in retrospect, to pick particular leaders or organizations as representative of them all. That doesn't make it so.

Speaker 2

Yeah.

Speaker 1

One of the things that defined the Arab Spring, as you mentioned it, was it's a leaderless nature. You had new liberals, you had monarchists, you had socialists, you had most of all, I would say, people without any ideological commitments at all. The majority of the human population has

not ideologically committed one way or the other. Most people are just trying to live their lives and meet their basic needs, and they're submerged in society that lends them towards a particular inclination, but that's not set in stone. Most people in the Arab Spring likely sought just the end of whatever it was they were suffering under before.

And of course, in these kind of incidents, geopolitical actors will choose to back particular factions, lend them freedoms and prominence according to their geopolitical interests, but don't give them undue credit. You know, during the Cool War, for example, the US would have backed rebellions they believe benefit them, and vice versa, the USSR backed rebellions they thought would

benefit them. And even today, the US is claiming to care about freedom but has continued to work with the Saudis who infamously invaded Bahrain to crush the Arab Spring that occurred there. And at the time, France's love for democracy didn't exactly match their offer to aid Algeria and

Tunisia in putting down their own Arab springs. Now, as I've been saying quite often, pointing to our hypocrisy, it's kind of a baby's first geopisical analysis, right, None of these governments have any consistent values beyond their own interests. But I think it's important to make this kind of

heterodoxy in movements clear, to contextualize what happened next. There's another notion that US intervention is entering these countries during these conflicts that hold humanitaria and aims to liberate the women or to liberate the minorities in that region. The

United States, like all the governments, is opportunistic right. It is taking advantage of often genuine struggles by people of its own situation or goals without a care for what happens to those people, either opened the intervening or covidly intervening. Most obvious recent example is with the goods in Syria. At the time they were convenient the United States interests, and so they weren't and they were abandoned. And this is especially the case when resources like oil come into

the picture, and Libya is extremely oil rich. So tragically, the West saw this uprising in Libya as an opportunity. Following a timeline and Encyclopedia Britannica, on the nineteenth of March twenty eleven, Libya was attacked by the combined forces

of the United States, the UK, and France. These countries now condemned Kadafi as an oppressor of the civilians they were swooping in to say, though for years before the UK and France were selling him weapons, They alongside their Katari and Saudi allies, took advantage of the protests to assert their military might. This move was authorized by the UN Resolution nineteen seventy three, and NATO would soon take command of the operation. While claiming to protect civilians under

a responsibility to protect doctrine, they bombed them. An allegedly humanitarian intervention led to the deaths of tens of thousands of a national population of just over six million. He infrastructure was devastated by the Natal Woman campaign and by the struggles between the government and the now armed rebels

of the National Transitional Council or NTC. A quick note by the way the NTC appointed themselves as the leaders of the movement, and despite the struggle being kickstarted by mostly working and middle class militants, often of an Islamic orientation, the NTC was composed mainly of regime defectors, businessmen and exiles who had a broadly pro Western, conservative and free

market stance. Some of the elements in Gadaffi's government and military had defected to the rebels and equipped those pre unarmed protesters with firepower, and so up to now we only have estimates regarding the civilian death dool, infrastructural devastation, and arbitrary detentions, disappearances and kidnappings carried out by both Progadafi and Antigodafi forces, not to mention the Liberate targetsing of black Libyans and sub Saharan African migrants by rebel

forces that took place during and after the twenty eleven war, with the claim that they were Goodafi's hired mercenaries. Many of those Africans attempts to escape were met with callous disregard by Europe.

Speaker 3

Yeah, callous disregards. I mean, there are no words strong enough to express a way I feel about the way the European Union has treated migrants in Liberated is absolutely disgusting and continues to be despicable. Yeah.

Speaker 2

Have you read Sally Hayden's book about this?

Speaker 1

No? I haven't.

Speaker 3

It's called My Fourth Time We Drowned. Very good book, difficult read, I would say, very much. It's some of the type of reporting that I try and do myself on migration, and that it talks about people, not numbers, and it centers migrants as individuals with stories. It's a great book that I probably not want to read, you know, right before.

Speaker 1

Bed I could imagine it sounds heavy.

Speaker 2

Yeah, definitely heavy gooing and so.

Speaker 1

Following a steelmate between the pro and Grafi camps in late spring of twenty eleven, the rebels, assisted by NATO forces, took Tripoli and toppled Gadaffi's government, and the NTC was recognized internationally almost immediately as the legitimate government of Libya.

As Matt will Gress notes in Jack ben quote on the day Tripoly fell, the New York Times headline the scramble for access to Libya's oil wealth begins was telling Libya's vast oil reserves, along prize by the West for being the largest in Africa and incredibly close to Europe,

were now open to business for foreign investors. As is the case with all imperial interventions, the attempts to get profits fluent for multinational corporations comes long before any ideas of reconstructure such as esentral infrastructure projects or insurance services, and really up to now that infrastructure has not been established and even access to Libya's oil is not yet secured, even though they allegedly managed to loot some of that oil.

In twenty twelve, Nagurdafi himself fled after the fall of Tripoli, but he was found NATO bombed his convoy and he was captured alive, then executed by NTC forces in October twenty eleven, after which the war was declared over and the NTC declared Libya and Islamic democracy in their constitutional declaration. The NTC estimated thirty thousand dead, and a UN report from twenty twelve estimated that more than nine hundred thousand people had to leave the country since February of twenty eleven.

Many were not Libya nationals, but more than six hundred and sixty thousand Libyans also fled, and an estimated two hundred thousand people had been internally displaced, continuing without timeline. In twenty twelve, the NTC handed power over to the General National Congress or GNC, and despite a formal end to the war, Grafi loyalists, local militias, and tribes shaped against each other and the GenZ. The militias wouldn't disarm.

The Graffi loyalists continue to fight and the GNC failed to put forward a new constitution, so in twenty fourteen they were ousted by the newly elected House of Representatives and in twenty fourteen a second civil war would begin in Libya, with the nation split mainly between the House Representatives or ASHUAR with its Libya National Army or LNA, based in Tobruk to the east, and their rival, made up of mostly Islamists from the former GenZ with their

Libya Dawn Militia based in Tripoli to the west. They didn't win the election, they didn't consider it legitimate because of its low turnout, and they didn't appreciate the amount of former Goodaff supporters in the new government, so they rose up to fight, claiming to be the National Salvation Government or NSG. So you have the HR and you have the NSG. Beyond these two factions, yours had an al Qaeda affiliated militia and the Islamic State, both engaged

in insurgent and struggle around the country, sometimes holding entire cities. Eventually, the two governments came together to sign the LBA, the Libyan Political Agreement that formed the Interim Presidential Council and Government of National Accord or GNA in late twenty fifteen without attempt at cohesion didn't really work out, as the U went back to GNA, now based in Tripoli, couldn't

consolidate power. By the end of twenty sixteen, factions affiliated with the NSG still resisted the GNA, and the HR, still based Intobrook, refused to endorse the GNA's appointments, so they went from having two competing governments to kind of having three. So the main opposing forces when all the

g and the HR. The JNA was backed by Tiki, Qatar and the EU, especially Italy and the UN, while the HR was backed by Egypt, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, the United Emirates, and to some extent, France, who technically recognized the GNA but also provided support to the HR for their struggle against the Islamists. The US was also supposed to be back in the GNA, but Trump jumped out to praise the HR at one point, so the

US's position was exposed as a lot more ambiguous in practice. Yeah, so the GNA and the HR would keep on struggling against each other for control over the central bank and

oil companies and territory over the years. By the end of one particularly significant offensive in terms of nineteen, which saw the country's largest oil field brought under HR control, the situation was such that the HR's leverage came from their control over the oil field, and the GNA's leverage was that it was internationally recognized and could legally sell

the oil. GNA leader Fayez Al Seraje and HR leader Shalifa Afta seemed to be developing in cooperative relations, and in March of twenty nineteen they were supposed to have a national unity conference, but then the HR tried to take Tripoli, whoopsie, so they kind of had to postpone that conference. The resultant fighting led to the HR take in Sirte, a major city between Libya's east and west halves.

With Turkish support, the JNA successfully repelled the HR from the Metropoli and the situation was stabilized with a battle line just east of Sirte.

Speaker 3

In twenty twenty, yeah, not just Turkish support, Turkey deployed the Syrian National Army aka the TFSA, the Turkish Free Syrian Army. They are widely believed to be rebadged Islamist from previous iterations of various Islamist groups in Syria, that Turkey has formed into kind of its own proxy force. I mean, I'm sure if you go to that Wikipedia page there are like seventeen million different war crimes listed.

Speaker 2

Like they are there. They are well known for their affinity for war crimes. Yeah.

Speaker 1

I can imagine the fact that Turkey, Turkey's back and them tells me everything I needs to know, I.

Speaker 3

Think, yeah, right, yeah, and that they're considered like a deniable proxy, right, like they could be like Turkey can be like, oh, well that wasn't us. That was these Syrian guys who we happen to arm and equip and run air support for.

Speaker 1

Yeah, what is their situation now? Now that Turkey is kind of back in the new government in Syria.

Speaker 3

They have largely been folded into the stg's armed forces. So like Abu hamsa Is I think a general or brigadier I can't quite remember rank, but it's a guy who has been widely condemned is now a military officer within the stg's Ministry of Defense.

Speaker 1

Huh Okay, So a more accurate description than would be that Turkey sent their war criminal proxies to support the GNA in Repellent Nature or Premier Tripoli, and the situation stabilized with the battle line just east of thirty In twenty twenty, and after other attempts to reach an agreement field they agreed to share oil revenue, establish a perminencies fire, and get both Turkish forces and Russian mercenaries out of the country, so the Second Civil War was officially over

in October twenty twenty. According to reporting by Al Jazeera. The UN initiated a new attempt at a unifying government in twenty twenty one, which was approved originally by both rival parliaments, leading to the establishment of the Interim Government of National Unity GNU in March twenty twenty one, thus

replacing the previously UN backed GNA. So we went from GNA to GNU, but then the GNU would be opposed by the HR, which withdrew from the GNU in September twenty twenty one and established the Government of National Stability GNS in March twenty two. So the GNA was replaced by the GNU and the GNU was now opposed by the GNS, and thus the country remains split into up to today between the UN back to GNU and the

hr slash Libya National Army backed GNS. And in all of this chaos, people on the ground have been suffering. They've been suffering human rights of uses, disappearances. Up to recently, the GNU imposed a morality police, and they have been numerous reports about open slave markets in Libya where migrant Black Africans are auctioned to the highest bidder. Yeah, this is a result of human trafficking and death bondage, so not exactly the same as chattel slavery, but the experience

and racial undertones are all too familiar. The suffering in Libya has also spread beyond its borders. Following Gaddafi's fall, the weapons of his military stockpiles ended up in the hands of militants across the Sahel region of Africa and even in Syria. You'll remember in my episode on the situation in Nigeria, some of those weapons ended up in the hands of Bokohoram and other Islamic militant groups in

the region, Pulani herdsman and so on. Tragically, because Libya just can't seem to catch a break at all, September twenty three also saw catastrophic floods devastating the country. The hurricane strong storm Daniel caused two dams to burst in the coastal city of Durna, which is within Jenness territory in eastern Libya. The flooding killed at least four thousand people or potentially even more, left one thousands missing and

displaced more than forty thousand others. Venetians, still wrought by civil war and still unrecovered from the devastation of the Natal Obomban campaign, surely could have mustered a more adequate

response to the tragedy if not for those conditions. In fact, it is theorized that the tragedy could have been avoided altogether because, according to reports by the Middle East Eye, a Turkish company was supposed to rehability to feel dams, but their works were reportedly interrupted by the twenty eleven uprising and subsequent civil war.

Speaker 3

Yeah, it's always the cost of war that we don't count, right Like, if you look at the twenty twenty three earthquake that killed people in Syria and Turkey, right like, Undoubtedly that would have done a lot less damage if that hadn't been for the fact that war had been raging in those places for so long, so like everything else got put on hold, all the normal infrastructure repair and so just that you would expect had to stop because of their warrant.

Speaker 2

That made things like the earthquake worse.

Speaker 1

Yeah, I don't think the people who rose up against Gaddaffi and fought and died back in February or twenty eleven had sought this outcome. Unfortunately, in a world dictated by the whims of imperialist powers, this was the end

of their actions. I don't want people to get it twisted though, because in the time since, as people have observed the devastation wrought by the civil wars, there has been an effort to almost whitewash Gaddafi and to limit our vision of possibilities to a binary of either perpetual Gaddaffi rule on one end or perpetual civil war on

the other end. Those are not the only possibilities. So we've discussed the legacy of nature intervention, which deserves condemnation in this episode, and it should be an indication that who the Western invasions and war was not going to liberate anyone. Yeah, But aside from that accurate analysis of Libya, since the fall of Kadafie. I want to bring in some conversation on demand himself in the next episode. Until then, all powets to all the people. This has been, it

could happen here, have been are siege peace. It could happen Here is a production of cool Zone Media.

Speaker 2

For more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website Coolzonemedia dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

Speaker 1

You can now find sources for it could Happen here listed directly in episode descriptions.

Speaker 2

Thanks for listening.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android