I'm making coffee so it sounds like someone is peeing in the background. Classic reassurance. You're gonna hear someone peeing in the background that's actually coffee. Actually, you're hosting a piss party right now. It's a golden shower party. You pop. I know that there is gay shit happening in the background. Like, you do not have to lie to me. I have a zinger for this one, Peter. Are you recording? I am. I am. Let's do it. Michael. Peter. What do you know about the Subtle Art of Not Giving a F**k?
At the same time, we've done a book where the title also describes my approach to making an episode about the book. All right. The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F**k by Mark Manson. Oh, we're swearing, we're bad. There is one nice thing that I will say about Mark Manson.
Mark Manson before we get going. There are worse Mansons. I'd say he's the third worst Manson. Surely there are better Mansons though. I would assume there are nothing. We often say that these self-help books should have been a blog post. And this one actually was Mark Manson was like a rich kid with a business degree. He got quickly bored of his job in finance and he left to become a blogger.
And he starts off writing about dating. Oh, no. 2011, he writes a dating advice book titled Models Attract Women Through Honesty. Oh, that's, I mean, new approach for us. Tell her about your yeast infection. He sort of segues into general advice blogging. In 2015, he writes a blog post titled The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F**k, which gets very popular. And of course, scores him a deal for a book by the same name. And here we are. It sells like two million copies and change something like that.
Does it actually say, like, based on the blog post, it's just like a funny phrase to me. I don't think so. If they did, it's sort of hidden. I don't think that they advertised it like that. The only thing better than that is in Pirates of the Caribbean where it says based on the theme park ride. It's just a really weird thing to think about.
So we can start off talking about the blog post because the blog post is sort of like a very distinct thing. And I'm going to send you far too many examples to get you into the proper headspace. Okay. To just sort of do what I do, which is initially just get you upset a little bit. In the same way that I'm upset. What year was this published? 2015. Oh, this is recent. Okay.
He says people often say the key to confidence and success in life is to simply not give a fuck. Indeed, we often refer to the strongest, most admirable people we know in terms of their lack of fuck's given. Like, oh, look at Susie working weekends again. She doesn't give a fuck. Or did you hear that Tom called the company president an asshole and got a raise anyway? Holy shit. That dude does not give a fuck.
We don't need a third example, but find Jason got up and ended his date with Cindy after 20 minutes. He said he wasn't going to listen to her bullshit anymore. Man, that guy does not give a fuck. Okay. I'm going to keep it coming here. Now, while not giving a fuck may seem simple on the surface. It's a whole new bag of burritos under the hood. I don't even know what that sentence means, but I don't give a fuck. A bag of burritos sounds awesome. So let's just go with it.
Okay. I was upset, but then he saved it. The point is most of us struggle throughout our lives by giving too many fucks and situations where fucks do not deserve to be given. We give a fuck about the rude gas station attendant who gave us too many nickels. We give a fuck when a show we like was canceled on TV. We give a fuck when our co-workers don't bother asking us about our awesome weekend. We give a fuck when it's raining and we were supposed to go jogging in the morning.
Fucks given everywhere. Screwed about like seeds in mother fuckens, bring time. And for what purpose? For what reason? Convenience? Easy comfort? A pat on the fucking back, maybe? This is no way to live, man. So stop fucking around. Get your fucks together. And here, allow me to fucking show you. Okay, I'm not upset, but I'm really annoyed. It's just like, it's so annoying. Just shut up. Shut up. Shut up. Oh my god.
This is how the entire piece is written. And look, I want to remain aware that I am on two podcasts, both of which have received the occasional criticism for using too much profanity. Yes. That is actually how I talk though. I was raised outside of Philly by a contractor. This is not how Mark Manson talks. And I know that because I've heard him talk. And I also know that because this is not how anyone talks.
This just convinced me to never swear again. It's not edgy to do this anymore. I mean, it's it's tedious. It's like when if you've ever been around someone who's like a little too sex positive and it like makes you a little more theoretical. So this is a 2300 word essay give or take the word fuck appears 110 times or so. So fully 5% of the essay is the word fuck. This is a right wing podcast now.
I mean, the thing that you just sent me is like so big that I have to scroll numerous times to get through it. Like this is a massive brick of words. And like all he's really saying is that in general, you care about stuff. Right. And it would be helpful to care less about stuff. Yeah. It could be two to three sentences. But he's not trying to say something simple. He's trying to convey the image of a cool dude. Yeah, he's he's flipped the chair around backwards.
Yes, down before he typed this out. Peter, we try so hard to be like nice and fair on this podcast. We're on the first excerpt. We haven't even gotten to the book yet. And we're both just like fuck this guy. I always want me to be fair. And so my initial goal is always to just get you to hate the authors. So then I can proceed as I want to proceed. So we can make it a Peter joint from like minute five onwards.
So this book is part of a trend during the 2010s of books with swear words in the title. Right. It starts off. I think with that satirical children's book, go the fuck to sleep, which comes out in 2011. There was a cookbook called what the fuck should I make for dinner? Okay. Just a few months before the Manson book comes out. There's another one published called the life changing magic of not giving a fuck. So this isn't even the first like I don't give a fuck book.
No, it's like how Hollywood studios used to release two of every type of summer blockbuster. Although I will say his blog post came out before that. My guess is that they were trying that they were actually ripping off him. But I don't really know what was happening behind the scenes there.
This is Armageddon not deep impact Mike. Right. Right. Right. There was one called get your shit together. There was one called busy as fuck. There's unfuckology. This is just like a small slice. I found so many of these. I don't entirely understand what the social psychology was here. But I am calling upon experts. Someone look into this. Yeah. It's like a midlife crisis for all of society. Now I understand the people that complain about the cursing on this podcast. This is already radicalized me.
This is so annoying. So before we get into the substance, I will say that after reading the blog post, I was just fucking dreading reading book. I was like, it can't all be like this. But he actually tones it way down. Like an editor got to him or something. The word fuck only appears like 175 times in the whole book. I was about to turn off the zoom Peter. I was like, I don't know if I can go forward with this.
Let's talk about the book itself. Obviously like the purpose of the cursing and the like aggressive edgy energy is to present the veneer of a book that is not like other self help books. Right. This is a cool self help book. Right. And that's how you're going to get the truth. Right. I'm like, I'm telling it like it is. I curse. I don't hold anything back.
Manson says stuff like this sort of explicitly throughout the book. He's sort of comparing himself to other books, other gurus, etc. There isn't irony to that because the real surprise of the book is that beneath that veneer is like a very generic self help book with advice you've heard a thousand times before. Right. It's not very interesting. It's frequently a little bit questionable. Right. It's also not quite dumb enough to be fun to read.
You know, dreading the rest of this episode here. Dreading where you're taking me. It's just a bore zero stars not fun. Also, the minute you told me you were doing this book, me with my like zero knowledge whatsoever. I was like, is this going to be like one of those diet books. It's like we're not like the other diets. We're like the don't give a fuck what you eat diet. And then it's just like, you should eat less and like exercise more.
Yeah, it's like okay. So it's just a diet. Have you ever seen the tiktok's of that lady that like smells chocolate while she's eating broccoli. Oh, God, no, that's dark. She's like trying to trick her brain into thinking she's eating chocolate while she's eating broccoli. That's what this book is. Oh, you're smelling cool guy telling the truth and you're actually consuming generic self help.
So the book opens with a little anecdote about Charles Bukowski, the writer and the famous degenerate, of course, yes, the epitaph on Bukowski's tombstone says don't try. Oh, Bukowski meant like let your art come to you. Don't force it. Right. Manson sort of extrapolates upon that to say that Bukowski was successful because he stayed true to himself and didn't care about what society told him to care about.
Oh, like women. It's sort of a weird example because like as Manson admits, Bukowski was like a complete asshole, like a famous asshole, an aggressive drunk, a misogynist. And if you look at his life, it seems like a pretty good example of why you should try in various regards. Like you should make conscious efforts to better yourself. Right.
He makes the argument that not trying is actually a path to success in a lot of ways. I'm going to send you this excerpt. He says, ever notice that sometimes when you care less about something, you do better at it. Notice how it's often the person who is the least invested in the success of something that actually ends up achieving it. Notice how sometimes when you stop giving a fuck, everything seems to fall into place. Yeah, Peter, you should see me flirt with women.
Sometimes I'm like, chat to some lady at a bus stop or whatever. And I'm like, dude, this is like a rock Hudson Doris day movie. We're like zingin back and forth. And then if I'm around somebody that I'm attracted to, I'm just like, just just vowel sounds. So I guess to some degree, I understand what he's saying. Your example is a better example than anything he talks about. Right.
Notice when you don't care about something, it removes the anxiety. But like generally, I don't think that it's my experience that I do better at things I care less about. That's not my general experience. I don't think my experience of the bus stop is like a useful rubric for understanding all of my behaviors. I think I should care about some stuff.
There's sort of like a weird tension here where he's sort of saying that if you don't care about the things that you want, they will eventually come to you. But like, isn't this around about way of caring? Right. This is like those diet books. They're like the minute you stop trying to lose weight, you'll lose weight. Right. Oh, so this is another way of trying to lose weight. That's the thing. It's like you're not not trying if you have the same goal. Right.
Now the heart of his book revolves around what he calls the three subtleties. Oh, remember, this is the subtle art. Oh, the subtle art. Settle T number one, not giving a fuck does not mean being indifferent. It means being comfortable with being different. Okay. Okay. Settle T number two. To not give a fuck about adversity, you must first give a fuck about something more important than adversity. What? This one is actually the central message of the book.
Okay. When he says not giving a fuck, he mostly means not giving a fuck about adversity in the face of your goals. Settle T number three, whether you realize it or not, you are always choosing what to give a fuck about. He says the idea of not giving a fuck is a simple way of reorienting our expectations for life and choosing what is important and what is not. So it sounds like he's just saying like set a goal, try to bust through any barriers toward that goal. Sort of.
So you can essentially see that he's very quickly abandoned any literal reading of the title of the book. Right. It's not about not giving a fuck generally. It's about prioritizing. As a person with anxiety, I know that I can think about the things that I want to think about. Right. I can just choose not to overthink things that don't matter. Piece of cake. Easy. At the end of the chapter, he says maybe that crazy alcoholic Bukowski was on to something. Don't try. Okay. He brought it home.
Did he? Because I don't think he would. What does that have to do with not trying? I don't really understand. I honestly think he, like the Bukowski anecdote is not in the blog post. He does the classic airport book thing. Every chapter opens up with an anecdote. It's illustrative, right? But in this case, he's sort of building around this pre-existing blog post. And so a lot of the anecdotes are just a little bit forced. Right. Also, we're already in It Depends territory, right?
Which all of these books come down to It Depends. So it's basically like you should give a fuck about some stuff and not other stuff. Yeah. Which yeah. I sort of put aside some of this because it's so generic. But he very quickly is like people these days care too much about social media. And it's like, yeah, okay. You know, like, sure. Kids be on their phones. So this made me think about filler because I was like the Bukowski thing sort of feels like filler.
Yeah. It's not part of his original post, but he needed an anecdote to open the book. And so he sort of jams this in, even though it's not a perfect fit. Right. Right. Usually the filler in these books, as you know, is like fucking worksheets. Palms. Yeah. Right. Like incredibly obvious. But with this book, there's none of that. Okay. The substance of the book is like his original blog post. And the filler is everything else. Right. A book of filler. So the core content of the book is filler.
So I think because he's like forcefully stretching a very simple idea out to book length, there's a lot of like general in coherence, unresolved tensions within his ideas. Even in the opening chapter where he's laying out the thesis, it feels a little bit like he's rambling at times and saying different things at once. First, he gives the Bukowski anecdote saying don't try. Then he concedes that Bukowski was a bad person. Right.
Then he says like, you know, when I say don't give a fuck, I mean, it's about being different. And then he sort of pivots to not giving a fuck about adversity. It feels like the difference between wanting to write a book and writing a blog post and being told you should write a book. Right. You know, this is the same dilemma as having a podcast about bad books when all of the bad books are this one. It's like, we just, how do we not say the same thing over and over again?
There is one substance apart of the book that I want to drill down on. It's the idea that you shouldn't try to avoid suffering or adversity. If you are suffering in service of some greater goal, it is character building and also a gateway to happiness and satisfaction. That is a key part of this book. I don't really have a problem with it as a broad principal. I do think it's worth noting that it's some of the most common advice on planet earth. Yeah. No pain, no gain. Or a league of their own.
What makes it hard is what makes it great. That's right. There's no crying in baseball. That's the bait and switch of the book, right? It's got cool curse words on the cover. He's saying he's going to teach you the art of not giving a fuck. Then very quickly, it's like, okay, it's not actually about not giving a fuck. It's about how adversity makes us stronger. Sure. It's like, yeah, I've seen Braveheart. Now I get it. And I've seen a league of their own.
I love how we have the most quintessential straight and gay. Those are our two Dutch stones. I'm like, let's bring it back to Dottie. I did just think of Braveheart up the top of my head. And the idea that Leliga of their own came to your mind. It's so good. And I had some Mariah Carey lyrics ready. All right. And a lot of his attempts to illustrate this point are just sort of forest half baked. I'm going to send you some illustrative examples.
Oh no. Okay. He says, the misadventures of disappointment panda. If I could invent a superhero, I would invent one called disappointment panda. He'd wear a cheesy Imask and a shirt with a giant capital T on it that was way too small for his big panda belly. And his superpower would be to tell people harsh truths about themselves that they needed to hear, but didn't want to accept. Oh. I don't even know really what he's saying here, but it's just annoying.
His whole point is that like people need to hear harsh truths or whatever. Yeah. But we do not need disappointment panda to illustrate this point. You know, what is it doing, Mark? I mean, yeah. And all he's really saying here is just you should have a realistic assessment of your like skills. Like if you want to be a singer and you're not very good at singing, you probably shouldn't try to do that, I guess. Sometimes you just sort of ramble on for half a chapter like this.
People need to be aware that they're not good at everything. There is a chapter called the value of suffering, okay, where the primary anecdote he uses is the story of the holdout Japanese soldiers after World War II. Do you know that story? I think vaguely, but I feel like if I try to summarize it, I mean, he gets something egregiously wrong and embarrass myself. So what did you tell me? Yeah. So there were Japanese soldiers deployed throughout the South Pacific.
And when the war ended, many of them did not get word. And when they were told that the Japanese had surrendered, they thought it was propaganda from the enemy to get them to surrender. And so there were several people who just held out for decades. And the last holdout is hero and not a, he returned to Japan in the 1970s. And he had spent the whole time bending for himself, launching attacks on local populations. He says that he doesn't regret staying in the South Pacific.
And in fact, he was proud. He was content because even though he suffered, he suffered in service of a goal that he felt was admirable. He thought he was doing a good thing. So I'm going to send you. I feel a lesson coming on. He says, Hero Onotas' highest value was complete loyalty and service to the Japanese Empire. This value, in case you couldn't tell from reading about him, sank worse than a rotten sushi roll. It created really shitty problems for Hero.
Namely, he got stuck on a remote island where he lived off bugs and worms for 30 years. Oh, and he felt compelled to murder innocent civilians too. So despite the fact that Hero saw himself as a success, and despite the fact that he lived up to his metrics, I think we can all agree that his life really sucked. None of us would trade shoes with him given the opportunity, nor would we commend his actions. Okay, I mean, he's reached the, I guess, correct conclusion from this.
Weird racist sushi roll line. Yeah, that's a weird, in the middle of it. Could have picked anything. Could have picked anything that smells bad. Anything. So he's basically said so far that facing adversity is character building. It's affirming, and now he gets to this example that sort of shows the inadequacy of it. Right. You know, Onada was content, but he wasn't a good person. Right.
And so you want to face adversity, yes, but you want to face it in service of good values, and Manson gives five. One, taking responsibility for everything that happens to you. Okay, two, acknowledging uncertainty, three, the willingness to accept failure, four, the willingness to say and hear no. Okay. And five, awareness of one's own mortality.
That one's a bizarre outlier, but he says, paying vigilant attention to one's own death is perhaps the only thing capable of helping us keep all our other values in proper perspective. I want to be better at tennis, but okay. If you paid attention in like a sophomore year philosophy, some shades of stoicism here, a lot of people pointed this out when the book came out, and then he like wrote a blog post being like, I'm actually not an adherent of stoicism in here.
And then and then other actual adherence of stoicism were like, he completely misunderstands stoicism. Yes, you are. So we've transitioned from don't give a fuck to actually, there are five values that we must all care about in order to be good and valuable people. Right. This is the opposite of not giving a fuck, right? This is giving a very specific type of fuck.
But then of course it is because like even in his opening example from his blog post, he's like, we all love people who don't give a fuck. I mean, not really. No. We like people who selectively don't give a fuck or don't give a fuck about things that don't really matter. But somebody who doesn't give a fuck about anything would be like, Bartle be the scryviner. I want to hone in on one of Manson's ideas, one of his values, the idea that you should take responsibility for everything in your life.
It's nice to see itself help book finally advocating for individual responsibility. It's refreshing. Bold stuff. He says there is a simple realization from which all personal improvement and growth emerges. This is the realization that we individually are responsible for everything in our lives, no matter the external circumstances. We don't always control what happens to us, but we always control how we interpret what happens to us as well as how we respond. I mean, sure. I don't know.
I mean, I don't really think this is true. Yeah, I mean whatever. But there's an argument that like you know what he means. Yeah. There are a lot of things in this book that are presented as harsh truth. But I think a lot of people want to believe that just because something is harsh, that means it's a harsh truth. Yeah, yeah, it's true. They're not truths. They're just like a cold, isolating view of the world.
You're not solely responsible for dealing with every tragedy that befalls you because we have responsibilities to one another, right? Yeah. It means you have a responsibility to others and they have one to you. I don't think that's like hippie-dippy bullshit. I think that's just like the most basic element of existing in a society.
For example, if your sister is really good at pitching and you used to be on the same team, then you get transferred to a different team and you can also come back together and forge, re-forge the relationship. Just to pick a random example out of my brain space. I love that this bit for lies on people remembering the plot to a league of their lives. It did take you a while. God damn it. Our gay listeners got that immediately though. It's like this no pitching. Ooh, I'm with you so far Mike.
Every like older millennial gay guy was like, yes. Someone just said, yes, out loud on the bus. Also to be fair, if you tried to say anything about Braveheart to me right now, I would be lost. If I'm being honest, I was trying to think of a Braveheart parallel as you said it, but I can't really remember the plot to Braveheart. See? I do remember that his enemies sent a woman to undermine him, but she just falls in love with him. Classic. The classic thing that happens to cool dudes.
I want to send a lengthy excerpt that reveals in my mind just how hollow and disgusting this world view is. He says, a few years ago, I had written about some of the ideas in this chapter on my blog in a man left a comment. He said that his son had recently died in a car accident. He accused me of not knowing what true pain was and said that I was an asshole for suggesting that he himself was responsible for the pain he felt over his son's death.
This man had obviously suffered pain much greater than most people ever have to confront in their life. He didn't choose for his son to die, nor was it his fault that his son died. But despite all that, he was still responsible for his own emotions, beliefs, and actions. How he reacted to his son's death was his own choice. Pain of one sort or another is inevitable for all of us, but we get to choose what it means to and for us.
Even in claiming that he had no choice in the matter and simply wanted his son back, he was making a choice. One of many ways he could have chosen to use that pain. Relidigating a comment on your blog from years ago by a guy whose son died, I don't know. Like what is the advice here? What choice is this man being presented with exactly? Right. The weight of his trauma is extremely difficult to bear. The fact that he's responsible for bearing it is what makes it difficult.
And the implication here is that he could take this pain and sort of like segue it into something. Yeah. And I don't really think that that is true. I don't think that you are responsible in the sense that you can change what you're feeling. It's actually much better advice to like give yourself permission to feel the way that you feel. It's like objectively really fucking awful to go through that.
He does later in the book, he talks about the work of a psychologist, like a Polish psychologist, De Browski, I think it is, who studied victims of the Holocaust and basically discovered that a lot of them felt that they were better people in a lot of ways for having gone through these severe traumas. And he introduces this theory called positive disintegration, which is very interesting.
It's not really what Manson is getting at, but he's sort of trying to like address large severe trauma in a way. But he never quite gets there and he never squares it with his like take responsibility bullshit because it's not really meaningful advice. You need to become one percent better at ignoring your son's death every day. That's the real, that's the math, that's the scientific way.
Obviously what was happening here is that that guy's comment shook him up a little bit and made him realize that there was something inadequate about what he was offering, what he was saying. And rather than try to look into work and think about what was like missing from his philosophy. Yeah, yeah, yeah. He's like, look at this, look at this loser complaining about his son's death. Am I the problem? No, it's the internet commenters that are wrong.
I will say this is something that it feels like you would do where it's like, here's this guy I've been Twitter beefing with. I know. There's just like an entire chapter in your book about it. I can see that from my car. 100%. This is why I haven't written a book yet, Peter, which is beefing Twitter beef. I would read a book just called Beefing with Hobbes and it's just like, it's you just like every chapter is just a distinct Twitter beef.
You've had. Oh God. The rest of the book goes through each of his like five values that you should prioritize. I'm not going to cover them all in detail. But there is a thread running through the book that I want to pull out a little bit. Michael, what is my favorite pet theory on this podcast? One book. One book, baby. Oh. The book that this consistently reminded me of was like a self-help version of the coddling of the American mind.
Oh. At one point, he even uses the phrase, the pampering of the American mind, which made me think that he was inspired by the original essay. The coddling of the American mind. And also Mark Manson now recommends the book. Oh, is he a butchstickist to Oberlin? Don't worry. He doesn't get that detailed. That would require a level of research that Mark is deeply unwilling to engage in. The eight minutes of googling that the authors of the coddling of the American mind did direct their book.
That's beyond his skills. Mark doesn't give a fuck about research. So like I said, he talked extensively about willingness to face adversity and a big part of that is complaining about kids these days. Hell yeah. People are too soft, unwilling to face challenges. I mentioned that there is a chapter called, you are not special. I am going to send you some of it.
Sometime in the 1960s, developing high self-esteem, having positive thoughts and feelings about oneself, became all the rage in psychology. Research found that people who thought highly about themselves generally performed better and caused fewer problems. As a result, beginning in the next decade, the 70s, self-esteem practices began to be taught by parents, emphasized by therapists, politicians, and teachers, and instituted into educational policy.
Great inflation, for example, was implemented to make low-achieving kids feel better about their lack of achievement. Participation awards and bogus trophies were invented for any number of mundane and expected activities. The funniest thing about this is that he says in the 60s, self-esteem, and he's like, the next decade, the 70s. Bless that word count up, Mark. Basically none of this is true. So first of all, the next thing he says is it's a generation later and the data is in.
We're not all exceptional. But there are no citations in this book at all. I was like, I guess we have to trust him, the data is in. The great inflation thing is just not true. He says that it's the result of an effort to boost kids' self-esteem. I found absolutely no evidence of this. Great inflation in both primary and secondary schools over the last half century is very real. The causes are complex. The consensus seems to be that it's the result of perverse incentives among the schools.
Schools want high graduation rates. They want to place students in good colleges. Colleges want to place students in good jobs. All of that creates upward pressure on grades. It's not because they're just trying to be nice to the kids. Yeah, they can't handle getting a D. The participation trophy thing, I mean, barely worth addressing. But someone over at Slate looked into this a few years ago and traced participation trophies back like a hundred years.
It's just a way to encourage kids to get into sports. So all of this is just bullshit. And he like hits on all of the dumb conservative talking points here. He says numerous professors and educators have noted a lack of emotional resilience and then excess of selfish demands in today's young people. It's not a common now for books to be removed from a class's curriculum for no other reason than that they made someone feel bad.
Speakers and professors are shouted down and banned from campuses for infractions as simple as suggesting that maybe some Halloween costumes really aren't that offensive. Oh my God. Chapter 12. What is a woman to find it? They're using different bathrooms. I didn't think it was going to get so explicitly reactionary. At one point he says like this is happening on both the right and left.
If you need proof that he read that cardling of the American mind essay. Yeah, right. He's just ripping from it Halloween costumes. Apparently a little bit of face paint is unacceptable. What was the paint? What was the paint mark? What did they think? It's also so fucked up that like my brain is so fried that when he says Halloween costumes, I actually know the specific incident that he's talking about.
It's like I have all these fucking fake anecdotes bouncing around in my head and I'm like, oh yeah, that was the one of Yale or like the guy who was a reactionary and gotten fired. It's like fuck. Why is this in here? Mariah Carey lyrics and fucking cancel culture anecdotes is all I have left. And then you're like tell me about World War II and I'm like, oh, no, tell me about it. The more cancel culture anecdotes enter your brain, the more you lose your grip on Mariah.
One day you'll be listening to all I want for Christmas is you and not quite remembering the lyrics and you will know that you have gone too far. It's very funny me that that's the only Mariah Carey song that you can name. No, first of all, no fantasy. I know. Keep going Peter, what else you got? There are a lot of Mariah songs you could play and I could sing along, but I'm not sure that I remember the titles. We played some at the wedding, okay? That's true. You did.
All right, there is a section titled victimhood chic and I'm going to send you a little bit of it. He says, unfortunately, one side effect of the internet and social media is that it's become easier than ever to push responsibility for even the tiniest of infractions on to some other group or person. In fact, this kind of public blame shame game has become popular. In certain crowds, it's even seen as cool quote, cool unquote.
The public sharing of quote unquote injustices, garners far more attention and emotional outpouring than most other events on social media, rewarding people who are able to perpetually feel victimized with ever growing amounts of attention and sympathy. I love that he puts injustices and quotes. Well, you can't concede any ground to these fucking lips. These fucking losers, man. So surprise appearance by San Francisco here. Remember a bit of homology.
Here we are. One book, baby. I'm never wrong. Is the next paragraph about how to use this to get girls? We should have heard and nail her. That's the only thing. There is, you know, there is the lightest hints of, I won't say there's sexism in this book, but there are times when he talks about how like having a lot of sex isn't fulfilling. But in a way where it feels like he's trying to mention that he at one point in his life, he had a lot of sex.
I want to make it clear that I have had lots of sex. Look, getting tons of pussy, being the coolest guy in the club. That's not all there is, you know, being a millionaire. I knew you were going to go into your voice. I can't help it. I could feel it coming. It doesn't matter that none of our authors sound like that. I have to. I know. You've placed him firmly in New Jersey. I want to step back and sort of gaze out upon what we have learned at a high level.
Do not give a fuck about adversity because it makes us stronger and better. Do give a fuck about important things, specifically the five great values. But not important things like the death of your child. The subtle art of not giving a fuck about a child's death. Lingerying over the entire book is this question of like how? It's simple enough to say like change your priorities, prioritize the important stuff, deprioritize the dumb stuff. Sure. That's not very insightful.
How do you actually do that? I sort of thought that was what the whole book was going to be about. I know that there are things in my day to day life that I pay way too much attention to. I know that about you too. But how do you rewire your brain? I am going to send you, but I think I can fairly say is the sum total of his advice on this front. He says, you are already choosing in every moment of every day what to give a fuck about.
So change is as simple as choosing to give a fuck about something else. It really is that simple. It's just not easy. Oh, well yeah, we're just back to like be a different person. This made me so mad. This is like if you opened up a financial advice book and the advice was like, get rich. Right. We have all of these like chemical impulses, social and cultural influences, etc. That like come together in our brain to form what we view as our priorities.
And the sum total of the practical advice in this book is just like, yeah, you got to change that. Pay yourself first. One of the first things I said to you was, I'm going to send you a bunch of long ass excerpts in this book because he just, he sort of carries on in his writing. And then you get to the part that you actually need to know. We have a sudden he's quite succinct. Any punts. I just got so mad at reading this because like, how dare you?
How dare you even pretend that this is a passable way to address this? Just give me like a shitty chapter with fake psychological tricks like every other book, you know? I'm just, he is implementing Bukowski's rule about not trying. He's doing it. He's living it. Treat me like an asshole, you know, that would be better than what you do here, which is just be like, yeah, you got to change that. It's like, oh, we're on page like 247. He's like, care about other stuff.
Peter, have you tried caring about other stuff? I, you're like, I was like desperately flipping forward in the book. Like, no, this can't be the answer. This brings me to the last section of this episode. And I think it's time we talked about this. So I'm going to ask you a question. I'll give you a minute. Okay. In your view, Michael, what is a grifter? Oh, this is something that has become a more commonly used term.
And like all commonly used terms, I think has taken on like a kind of muddy definition. Yeah. But I think of it as someone who like knows that they are scamming you and are scamming you. Yeah, I think that you're on to something there. I think there needs to be a bad faith element. Right. I think maybe a simple way to define it is someone who aggressively monetizes themselves in a way that undermines the authenticity of what they're doing. Right.
So it seems like the true goal is the money rather than whatever they say it is. So Mark Manson was a blogger, like I said, right? He publishes a dating book, one of thousands on the market. He keeps blogging, writes a popular post, spends that into a book deal for this book. The book is a hit and from there he just sort of keeps it going in various ways. He puts out another book in 2019 called Everything is Fucked. Okay. He co-writes Will Smith's memoir in 2021.
Okay. That's actually the most respectable thing he's done so far. He's like ghost writing is a real art. He sells monthly subscription content on his website where you go access to like articles and his e-books, video courses, he posts videos on YouTube in some of which is just him summarizing his own content. A lot of which is him summarizing his own content. He recently launched a podcast just this year.
He put out the subtle art of not giving a fuck movie, which I watched 10 minutes of last night before I realized I hadn't watched this week's survivor. And I was like, no, you tried. You tried. You made it 10 minutes from what I could gather. It was him doing loose narration over like stock footage. Okay. I did not. I couldn't do it. I was like, no. I've always wanted a sequel to Koyana's Cotsie that's mostly complained about internet commenters and color sophomores.
You know, I said right up top that he rambles. And the result is like a bunch of different ideas that just don't fully mesh. The letter section where he's talking about how like you need to be aware of your own mortality. It's just him sort of going on about death and its meaning and like what it means for how we should live our lives.
And he says the only way to be comfortable with death is to understand and see yourself as something bigger than yourself, to choose values that stretch beyond serving yourself that are simple and immediate and controllable and tolerant of the chaotic world around you. This is the basic root of all happiness. He sort of has this very atomized presentation. And then all of a sudden he like hivots into being like, well, you're part of something bigger you need to have values that reflect that.
But the bulk of the book is talking about taking responsibility and facing adversity. It's all very, very individualistic. There's nothing that really goes into any depth about building community, developing connections with other people. Right. So I really do feel like this is just a 30 something rambling. Like sort of different tangents come out, you know, he's not, he hasn't really thought it through.
And that's because he's a guy who wrote a fucking blog post and then got offered a book deal and was like, yeah, sure. There's also I feel like these guys kind of have to throw in something that acknowledges that like we live in a larger world. Like yeah, you should care about values and morality and community. But like that's always the part of the book that they've thought about the least. Right. This is your world view, why should I help other people?
Right. If I'm going to a soup kitchen to help the homeless, well, they're homeless because they didn't work hard enough and they're lazy. The whole world view is based on the idea that it's their fucking fault. So like, of course, I'm not going to engage with my community. I'm going to allow Mark Manson himself to articulate this for us. Ooh, this is from the book. And it features the phrase, the pampering of the modern mind.
I like how he like used synonyms for like two of the words to make it seem like he wasn't just like heartedly lifting that. The cradling of the United States might. He says, the pampering of the modern mind has resulted in a population that feels deserving of something without earning that something, a population that feels they have a right to something without sacrificing for it.
People declare themselves experts, entrepreneurs, inventors, innovators, mavericks, and coaches without any real life experience. Oh, it's one book. One book, baby. And you the grip that he's doing. How do you write that? How do you write that, dude? You're a finance dropout who started blogging and you're talking shit about people without real life experience. Yeah. This can't be fucking real. Look, people are going to use curse words to make themselves seem itchy.
Well, actually repackaging reactionary, all standard advice for you and selling it back to you. Can you believe it? Can you believe it? What there are people doing that? They're going to use an aggressively folksy tone with you. One thing I read when I saw people chatting about this on like Reddit was someone saying that they read this book a few years ago and I thought it was so insightful and helped them a lot. And they read it again a few years later and were like, what the fuck is this?
Yeah. And I think a lot of self help is like that where it's just getting people at a time when they need advice more than they need any specific advice and are using advice. It's like the feeling that you're receiving advice is itself therapeutic. Right. And so a lot of people I think are just at like a crossroads in their life or whatever reason they read a book like this and they come away with like a good impression because they just needed to be like talked to.
But this is also why I have like basically no contempt for people who read and enjoy these books but bottomless contempt for the authors because they're fulfilling a real emotional need for people. And sometimes you just need a little pep talk. Absolutely. Like I think that's totally fine. And I think honestly there's ways of writing these books that are like not that shitty.
And like I get that they're in an individualistic frame and they never cover structural solutions etc. And like the sort of limitations of the genre are kind of inherently baked into these books and that's fine. But there's like a responsible way to do this. All people like you're not a piece of shit and like you can do stuff and like everything is going to turn out okay. I think fulfilling that emotional need is totally fine.
And even like in this book it sounds like the actual core advice is like set a goal and like try to work through adversity and it might be hard sometimes. And like that's like at the bottom of it pretty reasonable advice. The problem is when you then package it with this weird world view stuff and this weird like wow kids have like too much participation trophies and stuff that is basically misinformation or a way of looking at the world where it's like you're not just getting this pep talk.
You're getting a pep talk that makes you think that it requires you to like step on other people or that like other people are doing this wrong as opposed to like hey everybody's going through it. You're going through it. Other people are too. And like let's all just be kind of as nice to each other as we can while we're trying to achieve you know the goals that we have. Yeah. No, I think that's right. I understand wanting to read a book about functionally bettering yourself.
It's a very that's a very normal impulse. I can't look down on people who do that. I watch probably three hours a month of Kansas City Chiefs highlights from the 2019 playoffs. That's I watch them and I'm ready to tackle the day. It's your emotional support playoffs. And you know I don't know everyone has something that you know perks them up a little bit. I think that it's for most people it's not the details of these books that matter.
Right. Right. Sort of like I've feeling that we're all in this together and you know there you tap into little things you pick up on in these books. And like you said the core of this book is not super objectionable. It's just that Mark Manson can only talk for so long before he says something stupid and gross. Yeah. He's pretending that he's telling you harsh truth. Actually he's just spinning a sweet sweet fantasy baby. My reference I understand.