Dr. Mary Claire Haver: How to Navigate Menopause & Perimenopause for Maximum Health & Vitality

Welcome to the Huberman Lab Podcast where we discuss science and science-based tools for everyday life. I'm Andrew Huberman and I'm a professor of neurobiology and ophthalmology at Stanford School of Medicine. My guest today is Dr. Mary Claire Haver. Dr. Mary Claire Haver is a board-certified

OBGYN and an expert in perimenopause, menopause, and all aspects of female specific health. During today's episode, Dr. Haver explains exactly what perimenopause and menopause represent in terms of their underlying psychology and biology and the specific actions that all women can and should take in order to navigate these stages in optimal health. She also describes the things that all women should know and do long before perimenopause arrives in order to best navigate perimenopause

and menopause once they arrive. We discuss specific nutritional practices, supplementation practices, as well as conversations that you should have with your mother and with your physician. In particular, your OBGYN not just as perimenopause and menopause approach, but at every developmental stage. A fair amount of our discussion centers around hormone replacement therapy, not just for estrogen, but for

testosterone in women as well. And the many misconceptions and controversies that exist around hormone replacement therapy for menopause. Dr. Haver explains how the specific timing in which hormone therapy is initiated plays a key role in whether or not the hormone therapy is beneficial for women or not. And of course, today's discussion gets into ways to offset some of the more common difficulties associated with menopause, including sleep issues, hot flashes, inflammation,

and more. By the end of today's episode, you will have a clear picture from Dr. Marie Claire Haver about what perimenopause and menopause actually represent the best way to approach perimenopause and menopause. And the various considerations around hormone therapy and lifestyle choices that can allow any woman to approach the years of perimenopause and menopause and beyond with the utmost vitality and wellness. Before we begin, I'd like to emphasize that this podcast is

separate from my teaching and research roles at Stanford. It is, however, part of my desire and effort to bring zero cost to consumer information about science and science-related tools to the general public. In keeping with that theme, I'd like to thank the sponsors of today's podcast. Our first sponsor is Aeropress. Aeropress is like a French press, but a French press that always brews the

perfect cup of coffee, meaning no bitterness and excellent taste. Aeropress achieves the perfect cup of coffee because it uses a very short contact time between the hot water and the coffee. The entire thing takes only about three minutes. I started using an Aeropress over 10 years ago. I first learned about it from a guy named Alan Adler, as a former Stanford engineer and inventor. He developed the aerobie frisbee, which I believe still holds the Guinness Book World's

records for the furthest thrown object. In any event, I'm a big fan of Adler's inventions. So when I heard he developed a coffee maker, the Aeropress, I tried it and I found that, indeed, it makes the best possible tasting cup of coffee. And I'm not alone in my love of the Aeropress coffee maker. With over 55,000 five-star reviews, Aeropress is the best-reviewed coffee press in the world. Aeropress also just released a new Aeropress tumbler that makes brewing coffee when traveling

or anywhere incredibly easy. This new Aeropress Go Plus is incredible. It's super compact, easy to clean, and you can use it anywhere. All you need is hot water and some coffee. And again, it's very easy to clean up. Also, with Father's Day coming up, it makes for a terrific Father's Day gift. If you'd like to try Aeropress, you can go to Aeropress.com slash Huberman to get 20% off. Aeropress currently ships in the USA, Canada, and to over 60 other countries around the world.

Again, that's Aeropress.com slash Huberman. Today's episode is also brought to us by 8th sleep. 8th sleep makes smart mattress covers with cooling, heating, and sleep tracking capacity. Now, I've spoken many times before in this podcast about the critical need for us to get adequate amounts of quality sleep each night. One of the best ways to ensure a great night sleep is to

control the temperature of your sleeping environment. And that's because in order to fall and stay deeply asleep, your body temperature actually has to drop by about one to three degrees, and in order to wake up, feeling refreshed and energized, your body temperature actually has to increase by about one to three degrees. 8th sleep makes it incredibly easy to control the temperature of your sleeping environment by allowing you to program the temperature of your

mattress cover at the beginning, middle, and end of the night. 8th sleep also tracks your sleep with very high precision. It will tell you how much slow wave sleep you're getting, how much rapid eye movement sleep you're getting, each of which is critical for different aspects of physical and emotional recovery during sleep. And that allows you to dial in the exact temperature parameters to really ensure that you get the best possible night sleep.

I've been sleeping on an 8th sleep mattress cover for well over three years now, and it has completely transformed my sleep for the better. 8th sleep recently launched their newest generation pod cover, the Pod4 Ultra. The Pod4 Ultra has improved cooling and heating capacity, higher fidelity sleep tracking technology, and it also has snoring detection that remarkably will automatically lift your head a few degrees to improve your airflow and stop your snoring.

If you'd like to try an 8th sleep mattress cover, you can go to 8thsleep.com slash huberman to save $350 off their Pod4 Ultra. 8th sleep currently ships to the USA, Canada, UK, select countries in the EU, and Australia. Again, that's 8thsleep.com slash huberman. Today's episode is also brought to us by BetterHelp. BetterHelp offers professional therapy with a licensed therapist carried out completely online. I've been going to therapy for over 30 years.

Initially, I didn't have a choice. It was a condition of being allowed back in high school, but soon I realized that quality therapy can be extremely valuable. And I now consider doing therapy as important as getting regular exercise, including cardiovascular exercise and resistance

training, which of course I also do every week. Therapy provided is with a therapist with whom you have excellent rapport and feel supported by, and from whom you can gain valuable insights, can be immensely valuable because it leads to healthier thought patterns and actions related to your personal and professional life. In fact, I see doing quality therapy as a powerful way to direct your focus and attention toward what really matters. If you'd like to try BetterHelp,

you can go to BetterHelp.com slash huberman to get 10% off your first month. Again, that's BetterHelp.com slash huberman. And now for my discussion with Dr. Mary Claire Haver. Dr. Mary Claire Haver, welcome. Thanks for having me. Delighted to have you here and to learn about menopause and other aspects of women's health. There's a lot happening in this area right now. Yeah. And you are at the center of what I

understand is a new direction for the understanding and treatment of menopause. That's what we hope. And related themes like parimenopause. Yeah. And the many important aspects of female health that stem from it like cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis and so on. So we will get into all of that today. But just to kick things off, how do we define menopause? So the medical definition of menopause, which I have a huge problem with, is one year after the final menstrual period.

And the reason why I have a problem with it is not everyone has a menstrual period. What if you've had a hysterectomy? What if you have an IUD? What if you've had an ablation or something that's suppressing your periods, PCOS? So for a lot of women and even clinicians, they are struggling to like find that diagnosis because it doesn't fit everything. What it represents is something much bigger. Menopause is also one day of your life. It is that one day exactly one year after your last period.

But it represents the end of your ovarian function. Some of us call it ovarian failure, ovarian senescence. But basically what separates males and females is many things separate us. But in my world, we are born with all of our eggs. We have a 1 to 2 million at birth. By the time we're 30, most of us are down to about 10%, maybe 120,000. By the time we're 40, we're down to 3% of our eggs supply. And the quality is declining as well. So menopause is when you have no more eggs left,

and therefore no more sex hormone or very little sex hormone production from the ovaries. So estradiol levels will decline less than 1% of your reproductive years. Your progesterone levels will decline as well. Tostosterone declines for sure, but we have other ways to produce it. So it's somewhere 50% or less than your healthiest years. So is it fair to say that we need a redefinition of what menopause is? I think so. I think defining it as the presence or absence of a period is a mistake.

Is there any consensus about the quote unquote typical age of onset for menopause? And is it changing? I hear a lot about how the onset of puberty is shifting earlier in females. Given that puberty, at least by some definitions, relates to the onset of mencees, one could imagine that menopause would be shifting earlier as well. So the things that determine when we have puberty or not are different than the things that

determine when we run out of eggs. Right now in the US, it's the average age of that one year after your cycle. So menopause, that one day is about 51 to 52 years old. However, normal is still 45 to 55. And there's a big variation. That curves pretty wide. Parimenopause begins seven to 10 years before that last menstrual period. Wow. Okay. And I say, wow, because it's the first time I've ever heard a specific number

tacked to this word, parimenopause. Maybe we could talk a little bit about parimenopause since it sounds like it represents a transition phase into official menopause. Right. However, one chooses to define that. What are some of the, I don't know if I should call them symptoms? Sure. Where I should just... Let me walk you through the endocrinology.

And then we can go through symptoms so you understand. So in a normal healthy menstrual cycle, before menopause ever becomes an issue, though female hormone cycle is a very EKG-like, reproducible monthly rise and fall of estrogen, progesterone, and then the brain hormones, LHFSH and then GNRH. So the way it works is our brain and the hypothalamus is sensing for,

has a little sensor in the blood looking for estradiol levels. And when they get low, it sends GNRH down to the pituitary saying, hey, tell the ovaries to start trying to ovulate so we can get more estrogen on board. The process of ovulation is what drives up our estrogen levels. Okay. So pituitary sends out the pulses of LHFSH, which then lead to ovulation. When we reach in parimenopause, the beginning of parimenopause, that critical level of egg supply. Those signals don't

work as well. We start becoming resistant to the LHFSH pulse-wetal surges. So the brain's like, hey, I told you we need more estradiol. And the pituitary is like, I sent the signal. And the brains like send more. So we get much higher pulses of FSH. And then finally, the ovary kind of, is able to get that egg out. But sometimes it's delayed. So we have the timing of that monthly predictable cycle goes awry. Sometimes the periods are closer together. Sometimes they're further

apart. But also the estrogen and progesterone levels start changing dramatically. We see much higher surges of estradiol than we ever had in our pre-productive years and then much lower levels underneath. So we end up with this very volatile curve and not predictable at all. We call it in our world the zone of chaos. So it is literal hormonal chaos. What used to look like this, you know, every month is now just insane and very, very, very unpredictable. That is why we don't have a good

blood test in perimenopause to make the diagnosis. Those of us in the menopause use symptoms usually to make the diagnosis and we rule out other conditions that might overlap. So perimenopause basically critical threshold. It's a downward trend overall of estradiol, but it is a very chaotic, you know, race till you flatline and bottom out. I see. So for those listening, your description of the kind of the amplitude of the estrogen surge, it gets much greater in this perimenopause phase.

You also mentioned that follicle stimulating hormone, which comes from the pituitary, has to be or somehow is upregulated in this phase because I don't know, is it that the receptors for FSH are somehow not responsive? At the level of the ovary, do we know what's happening to the ovary? Is it obviously the signal is getting there? It's not effective. So then the brain is kicking out

more FSH. Is it that the ovary is so? So the egg quality is poor. And then around each germ cell is the thecholudian cells, which is actually where the estradiol, the whole pathway going from, you know, actually testosterone is converted to estradiol. So that whole pathway, you know, it still will respond, but the cells are just old, you know, is the way that it's been explained to me and from what I've read. I think we need a lot more research in this area because that is how we're

going to help women, I think longer term is understanding that process better. But you know, all I learned in school 25 years ago was it's the transition to menopause, the end. You know, the whole endocrinological process, I didn't learn until about two years ago. And my guess is just based on my understanding of the only recent trend toward emphasizing studies of both female and male, even just mice and mouse models, which is where generally the stuff originates and then it shifts

into humans once certain targets are identified. Only recently has the NIH insisted that there be female mice in the studies of mice. I mean, it's been a few years now, but that's a, you know, sexes of biological variables is actually a requirement in most grant applications, unless of course there's a specific reason to study only one or the other sex of mice. So you can imagine that the birth of research in this area is due to a long desert of absence of studies

into what is perimenopause. So for women who are in the age range of perimenopause or who are thinking about this, are there things that they can do in order to either upregulate the sensitivity of the ovary to FSH or to somehow prolong this period of perimenopause? And I should also say, what are some reasons why they would want to do that? You know, obviously this is part of the arc of maturation of the female reproductive axis, but of course that alone is not a reason to

not try and I guess we say optimize it for one's well-being. So we don't know when you, the best way I can highlight why we don't know or where the dollars are going for research, you know, we go to PubMed and you type in the word pregnancy 1.1 million articles come up. Type in the word menopause, it's down to 97,000. Really? You type in the word perimenopause and I check this like two weeks ago and it was like 6,400 and something. Wow. Yeah. That is surprising. So maybe it shouldn't be

surprising given what we were just talking about in terms of. So as far as like why those cells are becoming resistant and what's happening at the level of the receptor, I think we need a lot more research in this area. I think it's starting to happen because women are realizing there's a demand now because the older you are when you go through menopause, the healthier you are for cardiometabolic disease. It's the loss of estrogen that accelerates our path to those diseases.

So are there clinical signs of perimenopause that either directly or indirectly relate to these bigger surges in FSH and these larger amplitude estrogen surges? The two best documented and studied are mental health changes. The brain does not like the chaos of and the neurotransmitters are very, very sensitive to estrogen and progesterone and even testosterone. So we see aberrations in

serotonin and orprenetherin and endopamin as the levels start becoming chaotic. So we have at least a 40% increase of mental health disorders and SSRI use doubles across the menopause transition across perimenopause. And now the data is showing that women who are given hormone therapy in their perimenopause have a lower incidence of new onset depression and now the neuroscientists are saying, hey, for these women who are developing depression in perimenopause giving them estrogen

is better than an SSRI. They're going to have a better outcome. I think most people don't realize how rich the brain and rest of the nervous system are with hormone receptors in particular estrogen receptors and as you mentioned testosterone receptors as well, androgen receptors. And the often direct relationship between estrogen and the neuromodulators such as serotonin, dopamine, epinephrine, acetylcholine. Gava for progesterone.

Yeah, it's interesting during neural development which is where I started off which was a neural embryonic development. The hormones exert these widespread roles in defining even which neurons will express certain neurotransmitters. And then somehow the field of neuroscience is only recently gotten on board the idea that this intimate relationship between hormones and neurotransmitters is something to consider in essentially every aspect of brain health. Right.

Not just cognition, but maintenance of neurons and offsetting neurodegeneration and so on. I mentioned that only so that people I think typically think of hormones as something sure there's a signal from the brain and that hormones are mostly of the body when in fact hormones play an absolutely crucial role within the brain. So you mentioned that during perimenopause there are symptoms that are I guess it's perfectly reflected as shifts in mental health.

So is this women suddenly feeling kind of less optimistic? Is it like what's the sort of constellation of psychological shifts that can occur? So we see increasing anxiety. We see definitely loss of executive functioning. So new onset of ADD type symptoms. We see of course the cognitive, you know, what we call brain fog and lay terminology which is cognitive. So they lose their words. They're not able to do the calculations at work.

Like their executive functioning ability and their jobs is huge like one in five women will quit their jobs because of menopause symptoms. That's an outrageous number. Yeah and the economic impact is huge and so now companies are starting to get on board and this is the time of our lives when the kids are grown for a lot of us, you know, and we're ready to lean

into our positions and really get into leadership. We all this experience and now we can't remember, you know, and now all of a sudden these and their confidence is just wrecked. So and then the depression and they're not sleeping. It's this horrible feedback cycle that they end up in. That we end up in. Yeah, I wasn't aware that one in five is striking. That came out of the UK but they're starting to like crunch the numbers here in the US and it's

looking very similar. I know we're going to get into actionable tools later as it relates to menopause but as long as we're discussing this phase of perimenopause, what are some of the basic

things that women could a pay attention to? We don't want to make people hyper vigilant to the point of anxiety but certainly given the frequency and given the implications, it's important for them to pay attention to this phase and then some of the things that they can do to, you know, either behaviorally or perhaps through other tools offset some of these changes. Disfunctional uterine bleeding which is abnormal periods. So and again, nothing's off the table.

It could be heavy periods, menoraja, tooth frequent, tooth few, skipping. It's really, really chaotic and but a lot of women are suffering horribly from really debilitating periods either through the volume of blood loss or they're having cramps and really and so 90% of us will have that as a symptom. Fatigue is a huge one. A lot of them, the symptoms are kind of vague,

you know, and can be attributed to a lot of other things. In our, in my, what we call the menopausee chat group, you know, we have a lot of theories about a lot of conditions like fibromyalgia and the irritable bladder, syndromes and that probably just perimenopause and menopause. And doctors didn't know how to put, you know, make that diagnosis. And so, you know, musculoskeletal

system takes a huge hit through the transition. So all of a sudden you have no injury and you're having hip pain, joint pain, back pain with, you know, you go to the doctor and you get next ray, you do whatever work up and they can't find anything wrong. Palpitations are huge. It is a vasomotor symptom. So along with hot flashes, palpitations so a woman will walk into the emergency rooms, sweating profusely, horrible palpitations, she's anxiety and they'll tell

she's having a panic attack. You know, they'll work her up, you know, everything's negative and just say, well, it's panic attack. Go home and know and knew to connect the dots and figure out that this woman was in her menopause transition and this is how her body was expressing it. It's complicated because we have sex hormone receptors as you do and every organ system of our body

and when these levels start going chaotic, it can present in so many different ways. And so when the patients come to me, I'm doing blood work, not a lot of hormone levels because they're not super helpful, but I am doing thyroid workups and autoimmune workups and looking for nutritional deficiencies and anemia and different things because I don't want to miss those things and just pen everything on perimenopause. Are there lifestyle factors that can offset some of this?

It's not a perfect correlation, but the healthier you are. So anti-inflammatory diet, you know, Mediterranean-esque, Alicindietesque, you know, nutrition pattern, regular exercise, good sleep habits, you know, all the pillars of health. The healthier you are when you hit perimenopause, the better the course is going to be for you. They're looking at extending the life of the ovary with pharmacology. We know what can shut it down faster. So we have kind of a genetic

predetermined age of when you're going to lose all your eggs, but we can speed that up. So if you smoke, you're going to go through menopause sooner than your twin would have as she didn't smoke. Okay. If you don't have children and you ovulate regularly, then the more you ovulate, the faster you run through your ex-supply. Okay. Interesting. I wasn't aware of those data. That's, I don't know that most people are aware of those data. No, if you have a hysterectomy and you leave your ovaries

behind, I didn't know. I didn't ever counsel my patients about this. You lose four years off the life of your ovaries. If you have a tubal ligation, you lose a year and a half, huge genetic disparities. So African Americans tend to go through a year and a half sooner, and then there's Caucasians in the middle and then Asian tend to go through later and they're not

sure why, you know, a year or two years. So there are, if you have chemotherapy, if you have surgery, if you have any inflammatory process in the abdomen, irritable bowel or intubitriosis, you're going to lose some of the life of the ovary. You mentioned smoking, are there any data on vaping? Not yet. I haven't seen any. There might be out there. I just haven't seen it yet. No, I'm guessing if they're out there, they're not prominent or you would have seen them. I'm curious about vaping,

because a lot of people are vaping instead of smoking. And hopefully people are neither vaping nor smoking because it seems that we had an expert on vaping on the podcast recently from Stanford. It seems that there's nothing great about it. Right. And there may be some things really bad about it, but it was just curious, given that a number of young women and men for that matter are vaping nowadays. I think we're probably needing... ...and we're at smoking rates have gone way, way down.

Another 10 years before we'd be able to, you know, see when those women are going through men of pause, you know, because vaping, I think vaping is younger, the younger generation, like my kids. They're friends. People in their 20s and 30s. 10 to 8. So we're, you know, we're 20 years out from seeing how it's going to affect them. Is there any evidence that alcohol can impact per menopause?

I haven't seen any, but I can't imagine that, you know, heavy use of alcohol would prolong the life of the ovary in any way. Right. So. And we know that any use of alcohol has some potential role in disrupting sleep, presumably like everything else, if you disrupt sleep, you disrupt things for the worse in that. Everything. Got it. So you mentioned rough ages for onset of menopause, 51, but anywhere from 45 to 55. And the perimenopause is defined as a period about seven years prior to that.

7 to 10. Yeah. Okay. What's the earliest you've ever had a patient come in who entered menopause? What's the latest? My personal patient 27. She came in just a couple months ago. So she had a special condition we call premature ovarian failure. And she had found me on social media and wanted to come just to make sure she was doing everything right. And so early menopause is defined as between the ages of 40 and 45. And then premature menopause are a pre pre premature ovarian insufficiency.

It's not a complete failure from those women, but it is very, very low is any time before the age of 40. So this patient kind of got kicked around for two years, went to her doctor, no periods, horrible hot flashes. Again, she was 25 and it was not on his radar. And he never tested her for menopause. And it took her, you know, 18 months to get the diagnosis. And so the longer your body is away from estrogen, the higher the risk factor.

And it's been all over the news this week where we know that untreated premature ovarian insufficiency has an earlier death. So they have higher cardiovascular disease, diabetes, stroke, all because estrogen is so protective and they have to go so long without it. We can back negate most of those risks by giving her aggressive hormone therapy early.

So she came in to make sure she was on the right dose because in premature ovarian failure, we don't want to give them an impossible on therapy doses. They're too low. We want to get her more like she would have, which is three to four times the amount of estrogen as a reproductive aged woman. And so, and she wanted to have a period so she would seem like her friends, you know, was an emotional thing for her, which I totally respect.

And so, um, so we were doing cyclical progesterone for her so that she would have a withdrawal bleed and feel like she was normal. Basic question, but I'm curious. I'll ask, I'm given that levels of estrogen change so much naturally during the course of the ovulation cycle, menstrual cycle. With estrogen therapy, is it a constant dose or it's modulated by how weak to weak or tired today? So there are some formulas.

So, and when we look at hormonal contraception, so the biggest difference between contraceptive doses and menopause hormone therapy doses, they're both based in estrogen and progesterone mostly, okay? The hormone therapy was developed to stop a hot flash for decades. Menopause was defined by the presence of our ups and so severe menopause was defined by hot flashes or not. They didn't, nothing else. And so they developed the formulations with enough estrogen to stop hot flashes.

Birth control was developed to stop ovulation. You don't ovulate, you don't get pregnant. And it's, but the difference between low dose birth control pill and higher dose menopause hormone therapy is not that far away. And so, um, that a lot of people don't understand. Now the types of estrogen we use in birth control are a little bit different. Most birth control is ethanol estradiol, which is one of the synthetics. We have literally millions and millions of women's year data on it.

We know it's safety profile. I think we're not counseling patients adequately about birth control as far as what it does to their testosterone and what it can do to, you know, oh, it's fine. It's safe. I took it for years, but I think we need to do a better job as a specialty on counseling women, but I do think it's a good medication. And then on menopause hormone therapy, you know, it's much lower dose. It does not suppress ovulation.

So in parimenopause, it's a little bit of the wild west, which one we're going to use? How high do we want to go? Do we need to suppress our ovulation because she's got acne or horrible periods or cramps or something where I want to suppress that ovulation to help her? Or can I give her menopause hormone therapy doses, which in effect think of the hypothalamus. I'm giving her just enough estrogen to calm the brain down and tell them everything's okay.

We're not going to get those big peaks and drops. And if she still ovulates, that's okay too. As many of you know, I've been taking AG1 for more than 10 years now. So I'm delighted that they're sponsoring this podcast. To be clear, I don't take AG1 because they're a sponsor, rather they are a sponsor because I take AG1. In fact, I take AG1 once and often twice every single day. And I've done that since starting way back in 2012.

There is so much conflicting information out there nowadays about what proper nutrition is. But here's what there seems to be a general consensus on. Whether you're an omnivore, a carnivore, a vegetarian or a vegan, I think it's generally agreed that you should get most of your food from unprocessed or minimally processed sources, which allows you to eat enough, but not overeat, get plenty of vitamins and minerals, probiotics and micronutrients that we all need for physical and mental health.

Now I personally am an omnivore and I strive to get most of my food from unprocessed or minimally processed sources. But the reason I still take AG1 once and often twice every day is that it ensures I get all of those vitamins, minerals, probiotics, etc. But it also has adaptogens to help me cope with stress. It's basically a nutritional insurance policy meant to augment, not replace, quality food.

So by drinking a serving of AG1 in the morning and again in the afternoon or evening, I cover all of my foundational nutritional needs. And I like so many other people that take AG1, report feeling much better in a number of important ways, such as energy levels, digestion, sleep and more.

So while many supplements out there are really directed towards obtaining one specific outcome, AG1 is foundational nutrition designed to support all aspects of well-being related to mental health and physical health. If you'd like to try AG1, you can go to drinkag1.com slash huberman to claim a special offer. They'll give you five free travel packs with your order plus a year supply of vitamin D3K2. Again, that's drinkag1.com slash huberman.

As long as we're on the topic of birth control, earlier you mentioned that the IUD and presumably this is some form of the IUD, not necessarily copper IUD, can disrupt or stop a period. A period. Maybe we could talk a little bit about the different forms of birth control. IUD, the pill, quote unquote, old term, but I think most people know what we're referring to and say that the ring and on and on. What is your stance on these different forms of birth control as it relates to their safety?

I guess about a year and a half ago, I hosted a female physician guest on this podcast. Both sides of the birth control issue were touched on it. One, the relationship to potential inhibition of certain forms of cancers. But then also the potential for certain side effects, maybe even cancers. It seems like it can play out both ways and this is a very heated topic.

In fact, so much so that I learned that if one is going to post a clip of any of this on social media, it almost makes sense to have them in the same post because we actually did both of them. We did a post where it was more about the pros of birth control and then the cons of birth control as stated through the words of this very same clinician.

So we will be sure to, so for anyone listening, whichever answer comes first, stay tuned for the next answer because my understanding is that it's not a black and white issue. I think the best form of birth control is a vasectomy. So much of contraception is dumped in a female's lap in a committed relationship. I can't tell you the comments I've heard when a patient comes to me and she wants to get X, Y and Z simply for contraception. She's absolutely perfectly healthy.

There's nothing wrong with her. She just doesn't want to be pregnant. I'm like, okay, you're done. She's completed her family. She's out. I'm like, tell your partner to get a vasectomy, he won't do that. Now, all of the risk and the onus goes on her. We go through the options of surgical, tubal ligation, which is basically blocking the tube. When I talk to my teenagers, I'm like, here's how you not get pregnant. A, you don't have sex.

Well, if that's not an option, then we have to either block the sperm, stop the egg from coming out or stop the place where they communicate, which is the fallopian tube. When we look at the different forms of hormonal contraception, which are meant to stop ovulation, suppress ovulation, because they're telling the brain, we have enough estrogen and progesterone on board. Quiet down so it doesn't send those signals to the ovary, right?

That can come in a pill form, a patch form, a ring form, and they each have their own pros, cons, risk benefits. Transdermal has less risk of blood clots versus oral has a higher risk of blood clot in any form of estrogen. We talk about that. We look at their family history or if they have MTH or Fari, any of the clotting genes, then we counsel directly versus the IUD.

The IUDs create an inflammatory environment in the uterus that blocks and it creates a plug in the cervix so that the sperm can't get through. If any do get through, it's a toxic environment in the uterine cavity for the sperm. That's really how those IUDs work. Some IUDs are coated with progesterone, or progestin, not progesterone progesterogen, and those end up decidualizing the endometrium, so thinning that lining from that constant progesterone to the point where you stop bleeding.

A lot of my patients really loved that option of being a menoriac, no periods, just for the convenience of it, but they were still ovulating in the background. They were not suppressing their natural cycles, just their periods. I see. Is there any evidence that the use of any form of birth control can disrupt the timing or the availability of... Yes. ...of the availability of eggs is a very clinically naive, biologically naive state.

Basically, what I'm saying, can any of them accelerate the onset of perimenopause? Can they delay the onset of perimenopause? They will delay the onset a little bit. It's maybe a year. If you use it for a long time, from what the data shows. Women who suppress ovulation, we lose about 11,000 eggs each month with the ovulation process to get one out, 11,000 race to the finish line, and only one makes it, but we lose about 11,000 in the process.

Women who are constantly, for a long time suppressing ovulation, will have a slightly older age of menopause had they not done that. When you say slightly older, what's the longest extension of... The best I could see in the data was maybe nine months. Okay, from nine months' use of birth control. No, no, so maybe like five to ten-year use. I have to look at the data again to be... I'd have to look that one up, but it was several years. Got it.

To gain an extra maybe nine months, maybe a year of ovarian life. I see. Nowadays, at least if people have the means, there's some trend, if you will, toward freezing ones eggs. This might be a good opportunity to just state something that came up before when we had Dr. Natalie Crawford on the podcast to talk about the immunofortility.

I think surprising to many people was her statement that not because it's controversial, but because we just don't hear this often enough, that harvesting eggs for freezing or for IVF does not diminish the pool of eggs that one would have, meaning you're losing them each month anyway. Yeah, and so they're only pulling out ten, twelve, maybe in a cycle. When you're losing eleven thousand with an ovulation, so it really isn't going to affect when you go through menopause.

Such a crucial thing for people to hear. I think there were a number of comments when we posted that clip on social media and people are saying, wow, I didn't realize that harvesting eggs would not somehow shift the onset of menopause earlier. For the record, we are not saying that. We're saying it does not.

Very interesting that the use of birth control, but I'm guessing only forms of birth control that suppress ovulation can delay the onset of paramedicause menopause by about nine months maximum. Yeah. And so that's the copper IUD, which prevent pregnancy by creating an unfavorable environment for the sperm rather than disrupting an ovulation in an eggway. We'll not presumably extend paramedicause menopause. Okay, just want to make sure we're crystal clear for people.

You're being very clear, but I want to make sure that I'm clear on it and then reiterate because this can be kind of tricky territory. I think there are a lot of assumptions about this stuff and there's a lot of lore out there. Why do you think that is? Is that because of the lack of solid research and communication in this area? I think so. Or is it something else? I think these are tricky topics for discussion often because we hear all this stuff.

Like birth control pills disrupt one's ability to get pregnant when they come off. Or we just learn that it can delay the onset of paramedicause, which by extension means there's a greater window for pregnancy if one thinks about it that way. But why do you think it's so such a tangled discussion out there? I think just the way that society views pregnancy and female health. At least I live on the internet now.

This new life has brought me life on the internet and this is what the algorithms are showing. It's a very friendly, everyone's a great nod. Everyone loves you. It's a great, Alison. It's what you're doing is so important. I understand the statement behind that statement, I think. It's so important because people are getting the opportunity to learn about really critical public health and female health issues in a way that just was inaccessible before. It is. It's good and bad.

There's a lot of lore and misinformation that's getting propagated. I feel like as a woman's health specialist, we did this to ourselves. We have not properly educated ourselves. We have not spent the money, the research, really championed women after reproduction. When you look at the dollars and the research and where it goes in women's health, women's health just gets a little sliver of all the NIH funding. When you look at all NIH funding and what goes to menopause, it's.03%.

Less than half a percent. This is one third of a woman's life. When you look at a McKinsey and company just published a report where they pulled 680 studies on chronic diseases, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease. They looked at how they were women included in the studies, but how many presented the data for the different sexes? What happened to men versus women?

It was only 50% of the articles actually did sex-specific differences and how this medication affected this process or whatever. The ones that did, 30% of women had poorer outcomes. The flip side, 10% of men had poorer outcomes. These things aren't just being brought to light. The lack of recognition of sex-specific differences in chronic disease and how menopause plays into all that, I think is where the future needs to go. We deserve as much good health as everyone else.

Yes, we're living longer than men, but 20 to 25% of that life is in poorer health. That's a really significant statement. I think that the National Institutes of Health has been terrific in establishing new institutes within it. They even have a complimentary health institute now. There's the National Eye Institute. There's cancer here. Is there a plan or one would hope for a dedicated institute for women's health?

Push. There was one piece of legislation that got pushed through the Biden's signed it. It was $100 million for women's health. That got chopped up very quickly. Menopause did get a little piece of it because we're also really struggling with intubitriosis. A lot of the female specific uterine diseases and PCOS and things. We need more funding there as well. There's another bill that's the one Hallibary was on TV talking about. Another bill for $250 million.

That bill includes language for education of providers. We have whole generation of providers. I graduated my residency training the year the WHO came out. We had very little real clinically significant menopause education. We knew about HRT and we were giving it in clinic if she was coming in with severe hot flashes. That got taken off the table after the WHO and we have a whole generation. All menopause education basically stopped after that. So WHO, women's health initiative, HRT?

No, that's okay. I just saw that people are on board hormone replacement therapy. Yeah. It's a, well, we can encourage the expansion of research in these areas with this discussion. And certainly I was on NIH panels for years as a regular member in the I institute. And what I've noticed with NIH is that they are very responsive to the public call for growth of research in particular areas. It can take time, it's a government after all. And they need funding. There's a fine item out of funding.

But I think that rarely do I ever get into legislature-based things. But if you are somebody who cares about more funding in a given area of research, it's actually very straightforward what to do. You call your congressman or senator and you tell them, literally, you leave a message. I find this kind of interesting. So it's a kind of like what we learned in social studies and in elementary school what you call your senator or your governor and you leave a message.

And you say, hey, you know, there's this issue that impacts a ton of people and it's really important. And the next time it comes up when budgeting comes up in Washington, it's really important. And if you hear about a bill, you can call and support a bill. And believe it or not, some of that stuff actually translates to more funding in a given area. In fact, the brain initiative, which unfortunately had its budget cut significantly recently, maybe put that funding back.

But you know, arose from the, I believe it was the child of two neuroscience professors up at University of Wisconsin. I'm probably going to get some details wrong. But so the collials are the professors, as I recall, and their son, overhead all these conversations growing up about the importance of brain science and then eventually pushed through government channels for more money for brain research. And then we had a long phase of pretty substantial research and then it was cut.

So these things, but it persists. And so these things really matter. They didn't impact it. So and they wish to send them a clip of your statements on this podcast. Getting back to kind of things that people can control. So for people who are heading into parry menopause or who are in the parry menopause phase, aside from the typical things that we hear about fortunately a lot these days, like getting adequate sleep, getting exercise, nutrition.

Maybe we could touch a little bit on nutrition in a moment. You mentioned Mediterranean diet, Galveston diet, things that are going to promote overall health. Right. So many things that people can do, maybe even take that would improve their outcomes in this phase. Like I've heard of people and I have no bias here or even knowledge of the research on this. If there is any people taking, for instance, grape seed extract or people trying to do a number of things to reduce inflammation.

You have general themes around self care and wellness these days. But what are sort of the five or six that come to mind, perhaps, as like the things that can move the levers in the right direction? But I would tell my 35 year old self, who just kind of went into this obliviously. And what I know now is your diet is probably one of the most important things that determines your level of inflammation.

And then estrogen is a really powerful anti-inflammatory hormone and we lose that protection when we start losing it through the transition. So whatever you can do in the other areas, especially with nutrition, sleep, stress, reduction, we need to do it. So fiber, we are not getting enough fiber in our diet and the Western diet, I think it's most women are getting 10 to 12 grams per day and we need at least 25 and the health benefits 10 to max out around 30 to 32 grams per day.

So focusing on foods that are rich in fiber. Fibers feed in the gut microbiome, slowing down glucose absorption, glucose levels, sugar absorption into the bloodstream. It is slowing down the rate of certain parts of transit and pulling more water into the gut. There's nothing bad about it, right? The foods that are rich in fiber have a lot of other stuff that's good for you too. Cofactors, vitamins, minerals, nutrients, you know, they're just so helpful.

And then anthocyan's, you know, just find things that crunch and get as many colors as you can. You know, green, red, purple, yellow, every color represents a phytochemical that is going to be good for you in different areas of your body and try to keep it as varied as possible. We're not getting enough protein and I have to thank Dr. Gabriel Lyon, you know, really helping me focus in on that. You know, when I first wrote Galveston diet to be honest and transparent, it was for weight loss.

And, you know, I was frustrated with my weight gain and that was the pain point my patients had and that was my pain point. But I didn't realize it represented something much more sinister than just the way I looked, you know, the visceral fat gain. And so learning about visceral fat and what it really means. And that is for your listeners, the fat that wraps around our internal organs. It's a very different fat than the subcutaneous fat.

You know, a pre-minopausal woman's, we age matched and looked at visceral fat levels, measuring it with the dexascanners. You have about 8% of your fat as a visceral as a pre-minopausal person. And then when you go through the transition, it's 23%. With no changes in diet and exercise. The visceral fat is not something that gets enough attention. Yeah. Everyone thinks about subcutaneous fat because it's really... It's cosmetically distressing, but really, yeah.

And one doesn't want too much of it for health reasons either, but it's the visceral fat that, at least by my understanding, is really the most problematic for our health. It's a hell of harbinger of chronic disease. So... I read that weight gain is one of the primary symptoms of menopause itself. Yeah. So you have to be careful when you think about that. When we plot weight gain versus age, it's a very straightforward linear curve. And menopause does not seem to affect that.

What is happening is a body composition change. We are losing muscle and we are gaining visceral fat. And so... And you might be gaining some cosmetaneous fat, but those are kind of the key things that are happening. And so that's really when I'm counseling patients what I'm focusing on. Because I have a body scanner in my office where I can tell them what their level of visceral fat is in their muscle mass. And so we bone and muscle that musculoskeletal unit works together.

And so we see this acceleration of muscle loss, which controls our basal metabolic rate, which determines our resistance to insulin, which... So that's the organ of longevity. That's what I've learned from Dr. Lyon. And everything we can do to hang on to it and build is so important. So protein going back to the original point. Protein intake is key in women. By and large, you're getting 50 to 60 grams of protein per day. And we really probably need 80, 120, depending on our body composition.

Yeah, thanks for mentioning Dr. Gabrielle Lyon. She's doing what I... Beautiful work in the world. Yeah, terrific work, really promoting women's health. And health generally, I know she's... Now, I believe it's exploring advanced training in urology for males as well. So it's only fair to credit her with really expanding into these different areas. But especially this idea that we need and women, perhaps in particular, from what I understand of... She'll be on the podcast soon.

So we get more of an understanding. At least one gram of quality protein per pound of lean body mass, maybe even per pound of body weight per day in order to optimize their health. Yeah, she's definitely on the higher end. You know, the WHO are the Women's Health Initiative. Some of the... My favorite data, you know, it's not all bad. It's data. And was looking at frailty scores and protein intake and women. And what they found was women who were having 1.5 to 1.7.

So basically, it was the higher their protein intake, the less likely they were to be frail the end. And it was... You know, they were reaching... It was kind of peaking out somewhere around 1.5 to 1.7 grams for kilogram of lean body mass. And most women are getting... You know, the FDA recommends 0.8. Wow, and source of protein also important, high quality. Right, right. You need all the amino acids. Yeah. Very interesting. Now that's in menopause, but presumably also...

So starting those habits in parry, just getting that laid down and getting those habits laid down are going to set you up for a much better postmenopause, a much healthier postmenopause. And we have to stop defining menopause by your hot flashes, you know. It may or may not make your hot flashes better. And we have great medications for that, if it's disruptive. But I'm talking about your cardiometabolic disease risk.

I meant to ask this earlier, so forgive me for leaping back briefly, but is there any value in knowing the age at which your mother went into menopause as a metric or a sensor rather for... Or as a window into whether or not you will go into menopause at more or less the same age. Yes. Of course, it's not one to one, we had half of our DNA from our fathers. So, but I always ask, and there is a...

You know, the latest data that looked at it, genetics is the biggest factor that determines when you're going to go through menopause. So knowing when your mother's your aunts, you know, went through, and if there were any medical conditions associated with that, is huge. Okay. So now we're talking, not so much about parry menopause, but also menopause itself.

What is the typical constellation of symptoms as one enters menopause, like right at the beginning, and then does that constellation of symptoms change as one is, you know, a year or two years, three years in a mental state? So, it's almost 100% with body composition changes, very, very close. You know, that visceral fat is tough to beat. It's beatable, but it takes a lot of work, you know. Do people know if they have visceral fat? I mean, there's their scanning approaches to look at it.

Well, you know, of course the gold standard is a dexa or even an MRI, but no one can afford that. So we have, like what I have in my office is the inbody scanner. So it's electrical impedance scanner and it's pretty good. So you stand on the scale, hold the hand. And I have the medical, I have the highest grade one for my patients. Most people doing what I do, you know, utilizing a body scanner, use that one. But you can use the waist tip ratio.

And so the waist tip ratio is a better measure of your risk of metabolic health than your weight or your BMI. So it's so simple. You take a tape measure and a calculator, you can do it in your head, but you measure the smallest part of your waist. And if you don't have a small waist, if it goes out, then just use your belly button. Just use something you can measure again. Are people sucking in or are they relaxed? You should be relaxed.

And I tell my patients, you know, do it first thing in the morning when you're bladder is empty and you're not bloated and, you know, and then the widest part of your hips. It's not perfect, but it's better than your weight or your BMI. So why does part of the hips with people feet parallel, standing up straight? Yeah, just pair of legs. Because people are going to go try this, right?

And so I only know the data for women, so forgive me, but for a female, if it's less than 0.7, then your chance of having clinically significant aberrations in visceral fat are low. And then if it's greater than one, you likely have higher levels of visceral fat. And so in clinic or when I was coaching online for Galveston diet, we were using the waist to ratio as one of the, you know, measures for their success. When measuring the waist, what's point along the waist? Is it right at the navel?

Is it? It's just wherever you're smallest. So that's kind of different for different women. So I would just say look in the mirror wherever your hour glass goes in is where you want to kind of stick to. But if you don't have that kind of a waist and you have a wider waist, just pick the belly button because you always know you can go back to that level, you know, that's mid because we're tracking them over time. Great. Those are very useful recommendations. And how often should people do that?

You know, you should never weigh yourself every day. You shouldn't do this every day. We were having patients do it or, you know, our followers do it once a month. So changes in body composition as measured by dexa or impedance or you don't have to weigh that waist to hip ratio. What are some of the other symptoms of the pulse? Fatigue. Fatigue. Multiple causes for the fatigue. A lot of sleep disruption. Sleep disruption is another huge thing.

So all of a sudden you're struggling to go to sleep or you're having middle of the night of waking and not able to go back to bed. That are new and different from previous. New and different than before, right? I see. There was a recent study that came out and most of my patients in hindsight say I knew something wasn't right or something was different, something had changed, but I couldn't put my finger on it.

And they just had a study come out saying something's, when they looked at what that means, what does I'm not feeling like myself mean? And it was psychological changes. So you lose resilience. You're suddenly more irritable. You're suddenly not able to like go with the punches or do, you know, you're not adjusting as well to change that you used to. You're snapping at your kids more, your partner, you know, you're you're you're getting frustrated at work.

You know, it's just very kind of subtle and it takes going through it and then looking back to say, yeah, I really say maybe about 47 that something was changing and I just thought I was just stressed out or whatever. And then now I can see that was the beginning of the pattern. So the menstrual changes as we talked about, you know, the big highlights vertigo, tenetis ringing in the ears, skin changes. So dry skin itchy skin feeling like you're having crawling under the skin, big gut changes.

So nuance that bloating, you're kind of eating all the same things and your guts just not handling things like it used to. So the Zoe nutrition study took 1100 women and did stool samples through menopause through the period menopause, menopause transition and saw the changes in the gut microbiome from the loss of the sex hormones. And basically we went from what a typical female microbiome to that of a male through the transition.

Is there any direct evidence that supplementing the gut microbiome and here I don't necessarily mean pills and powders? Right. I mean, my understanding is that getting enough fiber and low sugar fermented foods can also support the gut microbiome. Yes. Things like sourcrout kimchi, meat for me, so plain yogurt just straight up nothing added. Yeah, so is there evidence that supporting the gut microbiome can make this stage of menopause more? I guess reduce some of the symptoms of menopause.

So the best I could find was most of them are are done with supplements because those are easier to measure than handing someone a cup of yogurt. Right. And you know which bacteria you're promoting. So they did lactobacillus and looked and bifidobacterium, I think, and saw that women who were obese and hypertensive in menopausal and they had visceral fat decreased in blood pressure improvements versus placebo.

Also it's hard to do placebo studies with food, you know, so but they do and then in the retrospective studies they can look at dietary patterns and women who ate rich foods fermented and lots of yogurt, you know, Mediterranean type diets have better symptoms overall. What's the difference between the Mediterranean diet and the Galveston diet? So when I got my culinary medicine certification, I was frustrated.

Culinary medicine. Yeah. So I was frustrated in when I was working because I didn't know anything about nutrition and suddenly like everything I was trying to tell my patients was based on like the one lecture I got in medical school and you know, good nutrition was like porn, you know when you see it, you know, the Supreme Court definition of pornography.

And so, you know, the best I'd ever gotten was the gestational diabetic diet and it was the Xerox things with, you know, I was in the deep, I was in Texas so it had like tortillas and stuff on it and it had been copied so many times you could barely read it anymore and that was the diet. We would, that was the only nutrition I had ever like handed to a patient. And so I'm like, eat healthy. And so I'm like, I got to do better than this. I don't know enough.

And so we had a guest speaker for a alpha omega alpha, which is the honor of society for medical school and I was one of the advisors. So and it was this guy, Tim Harlan, who had started this culinary medicine movement and it was basically nutrition for doctors and he developed this like online program and I had to go to New Orleans for a lab.

It's in a Tonyo for a lab and work in kitchens where you were learning how to counsel patients, how to cook and also basically like getting a little minor in nutrition. So it was the best thing I've ever done. I learned to say very cool women.

I learned about allergies and like all this stuff, you know, food allergies and things that I just did know and just basic nutritional principles like what it takes to build a healthy body and what you know, I knew about Quasher or a core and like severe deficiencies, not good basic nutrition. And so you know, they talked heavily about Mediterranean. They talked a lot about the FAD diets and stuff.

But you know, the principles of the Mediterranean, I was like, I want to teach this to my patients but they're not going to eat a lot of Greek yogurt or they're probably not going to eat a lot of feta, you know, like how can I kind of take these blocks and make it more Americanized? That was kind of like the brainchild for me around Galveston diet was let me like create something and I really was in divesting at the time too.

I was like, let me put this fasting thing together with, you know, good nutritional anti-inflammatory principles and talk about the things we know or probably you should, you know, not have in a whole lot of, you know, processed foods and high sugars and stuff and explain it in a way and how it's affecting their mental pause and like how can she approach her nutrition? And that's how Galveston diet was born.

It was for my patients and then I gave it to my girlfriends and then they started sharing it and I talked about it one day on Facebook and the world exploded. In the best way. In the best way. Yeah, it led me here. Right. Right. So, what is the evidence that fasting can be beneficial or detrimental to perimenopause? Yeah. So, the jury's kind of still out on that one.

I was really liked the data that, you know, I think it was Mark Mattson had done on neurodegenerative disease and using fasting as a tool there and lowering inflammation levels. So, I was like, this is amazing. This is great because so much about menopause is a pro-inflammatory, you know. Is this intermittent fasting some time or two to three to five? Yeah, so he was basically doing 68, you know, and you know, very scheduled intermittent fasting.

And so, that was something I was coaching my followers about, you know, consider this, try this. This might be something to help lower inflammation. I pulled back on that because it's really hard to get enough protein in for a lot of women, especially if they came in at 60 and now I'm telling them to double their protein, you know, and then giving them an eight hour window to do it. They're like, I'm walking around, no, I'm on a chicken breast all day, you know. This is hard. Right.

And metabolizing protein is its own work. Right. And so, you have to spread it out throughout the day, you know, and a lot of that work was done at UTME where I did my under, I mean, my residency and where I taught for years. And so, I was friendly with the nutrition department there. I was getting all excited about everything.

And they're like, you know, I went to several of their conferences and like talking about breaking up protein intake into nuggets throughout the day because most women have very little protein with breakfast, maybe weak gluten in their toast. And then have a little bit of lunch and then kind of stack their protein at night and they're still not getting enough, but they're overdoing it and they're evening meal. That's their big protein meal.

And so, like teaching them to kind of, you know, what I was teaching in Dallas and I was, you need to have a healthy fat, a good healthy car and a protein with every meal and snack that you eat, you know. What do you think that protein has not been emphasized enough until recently? I think because we didn't understand it. You know, we didn't understand how important muscle was and I mean, we knew that protein intake was important for muscle, but muscle was for bodybuilders and not for women.

I lived my whole life up until about five years ago eating to be thin and moving to be thin. That thin was the only measurement of health that I needed to worry about. And what I did was chip away at my bone and muscle strength and thank God I don't have osteophenia yet. You know, I've hopefully have reversed whatever trend I was on and I'm naturally low muscle. So now it's just a battle to try to hang on to what little I have and build some. And you were in resistance training? Yeah, yeah.

Yeah, now. Three days a week. Three days a week. Yeah, I'm resistance training. Much less cardio. I was running marathons. It was a great social thing with my girlfriends, but you know, everything I did was cardio. I taught step aerobics, you know, the only weights I did were maybe in Zumba, maybe one or two pounds, you know. So, and that was a good, better than being on the couch.

I mean, I loved the community and doing that, but you know, for me to like stay out of the nursing home, which was my ultimate goal for as long as possible, I need to pick up some weights and heavy weights. And so that's where my focus has changed. Isn't it interesting that it wasn't until recently that it was only bodybuilders and football players and people preparing for military or specific sport would resistance train.

And now we are told that everybody, male, female, young, old should resistance train. Absolutely. I believe three times a week. Yeah. And the my generation is struggling because we don't know how to do it. And so I'm, you know, and I'm not a personal trainer, I don't pretend, you know, I hire one to help me develop a program so that I don't hurt myself and then I can get stronger, you know, progressive loads. So, you know, and again, Dr. Lyon, such a huge proponent of that.

And so what I try to do publicly is show my workouts so that people, I normalize it and people see me doing it and they're like, well, she can do it, then I can do it. That's great, super inspiring. And it really helps cross that threshold where people, as you said, they don't know how. It's scary. Right. For people who have resistance train for a long time, they go into a gym, they know how all that stuff works.

But for those that don't, it's- You're wandering around like, what does this one do? Yeah, it's intimidating for a whole bunch of reasons. Well, thank you for putting that content out. Both the prescription, if you will, but also the example that one can go about it. So I'm guessing if you could go back 20 years, you would have started resistance training earlier and eating more. Yeah, stronger for scanning nutrition over calories and stop looking, trying to look a certain way.

You know, you're undermining your future health by doing that. I'd like to take a quick break and acknowledge our sponsor, Inside Tracker. Inside Tracker is a personalized nutrition platform that analyzes data from your blood NDNA to help you better understand your body and help you reach your health goals. Now, I've long been a believer in getting regular blood work done.

For the simple reason, then many of the factors that impact your immediate and long-term health can only be analyzed from a quality blood test. Now, a major problem with a lot of blood tests out there is that you get information back about metabolic factors in hormones and lipids and so forth, but you don't know what to do with that information.

Within Inside Tracker, they make it very easy to know what to do with those numbers, because they have a personalized platform that allows you to see the levels of those metabolic factors, lipids, hormones, etc. And they give you specific directives that you can follow related to nutrition, behavioral modifications, supplementation, and more that can help you bring those numbers into the ranges that are optimal for you.

If you'd like to try Inside Tracker, you can go to insidetracker.com slash huberman to get 10% off their new membership program. Inside Tracker membership offers significantly reduced prices on Inside Tracker's comprehensive blood panels. Again, that's insidetracker.com slash huberman to get 10% off. So what are some other symptoms of menopause? You mentioned body composition changes. The one that we hear about the most for some reason, I don't know, is hot flashes. Yeah, so I think hot flashes.

So in medicine, we call it a vasomotor symptom. So we have a dysregulation of the thermal regulatory center in hypothalamus and that, the thermostat gets reset, basically. So what happens is we have this vasodilation of, it starts in the core, typically from most women somewhere in the chest, neck area, and you feel this heat. I can probably trigger one just by talking about it.

And it goes up into the neck and out into the extremities and then you just start profusely sweating from all the blood vessels dilating. And then it can last minutes to a second. But for some women, it's preceded by sometimes palpitations, sometimes by this intense feeling of dysphoria, this intense sadness feeling, and then it just kind of passes.

But say wherever you are in your life, whatever you're doing, all of a sudden you're just sweating profusely in the middle of some important area of your life worked, whatever your jobs are in your life. And it's disruptive. If it happens at night, you don't sleep. And for some women, it's severe where they're having multiple ones a day. And anytime you disrupt sleep, then daytime is far worse, regulation of everything. Yeah, you stress differently. Everything changes.

And so when my patients come in, the first questions we ask are sleep. And that's the first thing we work on is, what can we do to get your sleep better? What can be done for hot flashes aside from the things that you've already described to offset and oppositions? So the goal, absolute goal standard is hormone therapy is giving your body back the estrogen, which will get your serotonin levels back to where they were, and leave that thermal right in the center alone.

So it's back to where it used to be. Let's talk about hormone therapy. It's a bit of a controversial topic. For no reason. Yeah, I was going to say I don't know why. Yeah, it's demonized. It got such a bad rap. And we need to, it's just some of the worst misinformation campaign in the history of medicine. Well, that's a bold statement, but I believe you. The way I understand it is that there was this large scale hormone therapy trial.

And the interpretation of that trial was something different than we now believe as a medical community. The initial, so it was really groundbreaking at the time, aging women were finally being studied. We knew from observational data that women on hormone therapy, probably 40% of the population of females eligible were on HRT. Okay. So very large amount.

Women who were given hormone therapy had lower incidence of cardiovascular disease, older ages of cardiovascular disease, lower death from cardiovascular disease. Some people argued that that was an artifact of healthier, wealthier women get HRT because they go to the doctor. Okay. So this is just because they're healthier that they have less cardiovascular disease. So let's prove it. What do you do that with? A randomized control trial. So flaws in the study.

They take, I think there were 11,000ish women in the estrogen-only arm because they'd had hysterectomy. So for your listeners, if you have a uterus and you're getting estrogen, you must have a progestigen with it to protect the lining of the uterus from an ametial cancer. As long as you give an adequate progestin, you're fine. Okay. But if you don't have a uterus, progesterone is not mandatory. So the women who had had hysterectomy got estrogen-only or placebo.

And estrogen at the time was primarine, which was the number one prescription for HRT at the time. So nothing weird about that. So it's just synthetic ester dial. Actually no. Primarine stands for pregnant, mare urine. It is actually very natural. They take pregnant horses and extract the estrogens from their urine because they're pregnant and they were greeting a lot of it. And it was cheap and easy. And I have a lot of ethical issues about how they do that. And I don't prescribe it.

But that's what was done at the time. So. So there are a lot. I don't realize there was a lot. There are dozens of estrogens in that, but the main one is ester dial. So then there, the other group who had uterus were given prim pro, which is primarine plus provera and or placebo. So off we go, they recruit 11,000 and then I think 15,000 in the other arm. Huge study. It's like a billion dollar study. We're so excited this is happening. This started when I was in med school.

And then they start recruiting patients and then everyone's taking their meds. They excluded women with hot flashes. What? Because if your hot flashes go away, you know that you didn't get the placebo. So they excluded women with hot flashes. Problem number one. Yeah, that's a big problem. Now, the end outcome, what they were trying to measure was cardiovascular disease. So they started with an older population. The average age was 63. Whereas the typical onset of menopause is 51.

So these women had been menopausal, you know, on average for 10, 12, 13 years. So time away from estrogen is when disease starts, accelerates, right? Okay. So put them on their meds, start measuring in the estrogen plus progestin arm. They saw a non statistically significant increase risk of risk cancer. And it was this, the relative risk relative. Now, you know what this is, but your money or your listeners may not. Was 25%. And I hope I get the numbers right.

It was four out of a thousand women per year to five out of a thousand women per year. Okay. So placebo arm was four. So we have breasts, we are females, we get breast cancer, about four out of a thousand women per year. And that increased to five. In the estrogen only arm, there was a 30% decrease risk of breast cancer. Regardless of the average age. And they kept that arm going. Right. Because it's randomized. So presumably the average age for the other group is roughly 61 as well.

Yeah, they were matched. Okay. So in their 60s as well. So they call a press conference at the Watergate Hotel. The Watergate Hotel. Two announced the findings. They hadn't even published the date yet. No one had had a chance to read it. And these, the head researchers call this press conference and say estrogen causes breast cancer. Exogenous estrogen from these. Yes. And they said it's a 25% increase risk. But the absolute risk was like 0.8% per year.

But that didn't get, that's not a headline thing. So in every like ABC, NBC, CBS, all the morning shows, nightly news, every major magazine. It was the number one medical news story of 2002 that the estrogen was bad and it caused cancer and dead. The estrogen only arm kept going. And they found after a couple more years a slightly increased risk of stroke. So they stopped the study. The effects on cardiovascular disease were neutral. But there was lower colon cancer in both groups.

But no one talked about that. So the American Heart Association in 2020 went and looked at, they looked at ages. So there were younger women who were given age or two. And what they found was if you started hormone therapy between the ages of 50 to 59, you had a 50% decrease risk of cardiovascular disease and death from cardiovascular disease and all cause mortality. Wow. So age at which you start matters. Estrogen. So that's where there's something called the healthy cell hypothesis.

Or and so basically estrogen is better at prevention than cure. And it's very protective, especially in the end of the coronary arteries. So taking that estrogen away, we lose that protection. Once the disease builds up, there's some worry that adding estrogen once you've developed after sclerosis or a plaque might loosen the plaque, especially in that first year. So which led for some people maybe to have a slightly increased risk of stroke.

So when my patients come in, we are talking about these differences. It doesn't mean that after 60, you might not have cardiovascular benefit. We start losing the benefit. So it's the timing hypothesis is key. And it's the years away from estrogen. That's the problem. It's a great study in the British Medical Journal.

They looked at years of reproductive life plus HRT and looked at cognition scores and saw that the longer your body is exposed to estrogen in any form, like whether natural cycles or exogenous estrogen of any form, and it was estradiol in that study actually, then you had higher cognition scores, healthier brains. Which at a very top contour level makes total sense given that estrogen is neuroprotective.

I realize it might not be neuroprotective in every instance and every neuron in the brain, but it's generally neuroprotective. Gently neuroprotective, yeah. And decline in estrogen is correlated with neurogeneration, which does not mean it's causal. I have to ask when they announced this study at the Watergate Hotel of all places, and the conclusion that they put forth was that estrogen therapies can increase rates of cancer.

I have to wonder if that had something to do with what I understand is a sort of party line around cancers and breast cancers in particular, which is that you want to quote unquote block the estrogen receptor. You want to get in there and put it give to Moxifen, or nowadays I'm sure there are other drugs that are more effective to block the estrogen receptor.

It all seems to pile up on the side of a story that says estrogen and estrogen binding to the estrogen receptor is pro-cancerous, which obviously I think you're telling us in an indirect and direct way now and we'll go further into is simply not the case. If you take a healthy breast cell and dump it at a petri dish and then marinate it with some estrogen, it's not to retagent. I mean, it's not carcinogenic. Estrogen is not carcinogenic. We live with it our whole lives.

If it was in pregnancy for those of us who are ever pregnant when our estrogen level skyrocket, we would see this into uptick in breast cancer and we don't. In fact, I think there's some evidence for the opposite that getting pregnant prior to age 40 is it true that that's protective against some forms of breast cancer? That seems to be somewhat protective for certain forms of breast cancer.

We have this whole generation of physicians who really weren't taught much about menopause, don't understand the protective benefits of estrogen and menopause's effect on metabolic disease. They have this mentality of estrogen is bad. A woman walks into her, today, 2023, they looked at the data. She goes into her doctor complaining of menopausal symptoms, which right now are still only recognizes generally urinary syndrome menopause, hot flashes, and nightswets, the very cliché symptoms.

Documents in the chart she's having whatever. 10% are offered any therapy and they're most likely four to one to be offered and any depressant. That is where it stands today. That is what we are fighting against. Is not every woman will choose HRT, but every woman deserves an informed conversation about it and let her make her choice. If you believe the WHOI data, which there are some problems there, the risk is small.

But did you talk to her about cardiovascular disease and diabetes and insulin resistance in her cholesterol? Because those things go up through the menopause transition with no changes in diet and exercise. And those are all, you know, even with the diagnosis of breast cancer, the most likely thing a woman is going to die from is cardiovascular disease, a heart attack or a stroke. So framing it like that, I think, is where we need to head.

The other thing is, you know, I was a great OB-GYN in so many areas of what I did. Why should this all be dumped in the lap of the poor, busy OB-GYN who's running around the hospital, doing pouts and we're trying to deliver babies, surgery and all the things? Like, this should be required education for all everyone in medical school. We are females and we're not little men with breast and uteruses. We react differently to medications, disease, disease burden, you know.

And that's not been studied adequately and that's where the push needs to go. It's bigger than just hot flashes. Do you think that one solution is to deepen the medical school curriculum? Absolutely. And more, and I hate saying women's health because everyone thinks breast and uterus, right, and reproduction. It's the health of women. And we're not addressing it differently than the health of a man. And we're different. You know, and so that, I think, is where we need to head.

Even that it's half of the population, one would imagine that the best thing to do is to make the core curriculum of medical students expand to include this as opposed to making it a specialty. I think so. Does that mean a 50 year of medical school? I'm not kidding. I mean, I guess, maybe. I mean, people said, well, you'd have to extend the OB-GYN residency.

I'm like, no, any specialist who touches a female should understand how that female, I mean, the starkest example is cardiovascular disease. You know, how much longer we have to wait in the ED? How much more likely we are to die in the hospital setting from a heart attack? Because we don't present the same symptoms as men do. And it's just the default has always been how it happens to the basic, you know, really Caucasian male. And so, at least in the US.

And so, because we respond differently, because we wait longer, because our symptoms are considered to be psychological, le-induced, less than biologically induced. And so, women are dying at higher rates. When you look at the data on statins, you get high cholesterol. So 80% of women will have abnormal cholesterol levels through the men on post-transition if they were normal before, okay? So elevated LDL. LDL and lowering HDL. So now they are at higher risk for cardiovascular disease.

Automatically, a PCP will offer her a statin, okay? That is standard of care. Do you know that the American Heart Association published in 2020 that statins have never been shown to decrease their primary heart attack in a woman? Secondary, yes, but no primary prevention. And it does not decrease the risk of death from cardiovascular disease. There are problems with that. Yeah. Yeah, where routine, you know what does HRT? If given in the right window of opportunity.

How is HRT, in this case, estrogen HRT given? Is it a patch? Is it injections? Yeah, great question. All the above. So, we have, I like to break it down into oral and non-oral forms. So everything oral we ingest goes into the gut, the liver, the hepatic system will pick up the portal vein and take everything to the liver for processing. When that bump of estrogen hits the liver, we can see a slight increase in some of our clotting factors.

So for that reason, I tend to go with the non-oral formulations to avoid that risk, especially if she has any family history of clotting or personal history of clotting, you know, we're going to go with a non-oral form. These are things like elevations in factor 5, lightening. And to HR, if she's had a history of a blood clot, we are not going with an oral estrogen formulation.

And for people that haven't had a history of a blood clot, my understanding, which admittedly is very sparse, is that you can do a genetic test just by blood draw to see whether or not you have two normal copies of the gene for factor 5, lightening. Some people are heterozygates, so they're more at risk of presumably bleeding in that case, right? But in other words, can people go into this knowing whether or not there are more or less at risk from taking estrogen from the ulcer?

So I don't think that there's a high enough for that reason because we're not routinely screening for these things, unless they have a family history. I'm going with non-oral estrogen as a primary product for my patients, because I can just skip that worry. So a patch, typically. So typically, transdormals. So a patch, there's even mispray. There's FDA-approved options of a patch. There's gels. There's a spray.

And there is a vaginal ring, which I love, love, love, because you put it in for three months. And it treats, you know, you get a two-for-one. You get a local treatment in the vagina as well as a systemic treatment as well. It's just really expensive and typically not covered by insurance. On the first tier, so very few of my patients can afford it. There are some injectables, which no one in the menopause uses. They're menopause-y. Yeah. They're also... The menopause.

The meniverse and the menopause-y. Yeah. Those terms that you coined, I love it. I think I did, yeah. Great. All right. You heard it here. So the menopause is a group of healthcare professionals who are from multiple specialties. We have cardiologists at Orthopedic Surgeon, internal medicine, you know, Dr. Lyon is a member. And we have a big group chat, and we all support each other. We support each other's books and research.

And we send articles back and forth, and we support each other on social. But we also band it together to kind of negate one of the bigger publications on menopause that when the Lancet published, it's a whole nother discussion. But you know, we are fighting for equity in menopause care and women's health. Great. Nothing succeeds like a group. Like the old menopause versus the new menopause. I love it. I love it. So hormone therapy to increase estrogen.

How does it make women feel psychologically, physically? What are some of the positive changes that can occur aside from just offsetting some of the negative? And I want to make sure that I remember to ask, what if a woman has been in menopause for you know, has passed that point? Because as you said, it's a day. So they passed that point a year earlier, two years earlier, three years earlier.

Given the results of this first study, which as you explained it, are problematic in their interpretation the way it was interpreted as opposed to initially. Yeah. Yeah. What's too long should, yeah, how long should you just stay on and when she's in there 40s, just in just to, you know, smooth the transition? Maybe. We need more studies in this area. Like, should we just, the minute we figure out like, I would love, like I wear glucose monitor. I have insulin resistance. So I was listening.

It looks like a little button size sticker on the back of the hand. I would love to develop one to track estrogen levels, starting your 30s. Just see where you're at. You know, start seeing or you having aberrations in your cycle and we can start the period of menopause journey and talking about should we begin supporting? I think there's a tremendous amount of opportunity for research in this area.

But typically we are not starting patients until they're very symptomatic if they're period of menopausal or they're postmenopausal. So in general. So if a woman is in her, let's say late 30s, she is anticipating perimenopause, maybe is in perimenopause and wants to start low dose hormone replacement therapy. I think it's something worth mentioning that not all, you know, presumably the dosages are tailored and then blood. So a given dose is tried, blood is drawn, you measure estridides.

So we're not, we don't have established levels of like therapeutic ranges of estridideal. What we found is that when we do that so far, I think we have some opportunity here. If on my levels 50 and your levels 50, I could feel like I'm on top of the world, my symptoms are gone. You still need more. So we are titrating from symptoms. I see. Yeah. Interesting.

So similar to what is done, similar issue with testosterone replacement therapy, which these days, you know, I sort of have to joke that the, you can change out the R in testosterone replacement because a lot of people are, a lot of men are taking testosterone not as a replacement. I mean, their levels are not lower than 300 nanograms per deciliter, which is a lower range. They're sort of low middle and they're trying to get high, you know, higher range.

But hormone replacement therapy, as I understand it, has never been strictly in men or women, strictly for people who are out of range that in theory, it can be to optimize, reduce symptoms and to optimize well-being. Right. And I don't know if the medical establishment wants it used that way, but certainly in the case of testosterone replacement therapy in men, it's being used that way quite often in fact. So the, we don't have established therapeutic ranges for estradiol.

If she's POI premature variant insufficiency, we know we want to get her to 100 or around 100 or higher in pycograms per deciliter. And but in the menopausal patient, we're rarely checking levels, but I do think we have an opportunity to learn a lot more now that we're able to track. How does it affect in your cholesterol? We need to look at those numbers. Like what's the optimal dose for cholesterol? What's the optimal dose for cardiovascular disease?

All we have, all these studies have looked at was, was she on it or not? So that's where I think the opportunities can come. So a woman goes on hormone replacement therapy. How often is she coming in for blood draws? Or are you just, you know, able to say? Well, depending on testosterone, we tend to check more often. There's, we don't have an FDA approved option for women for testosterone.

And so no. So we either try to get her T-stem or she's finding someone to insert a pellet or something and there's other issues with that. What I do in Texas is really hard. The pharmacists do not like to do the T-stem for patients. And I've even, T-stem is the gel, you know. And I end up compounding it in a cream and do a transdormal cream for the patients, but there's such variable absorption. We do tend to check more levels of that just to make, try to get her therapeutic.

So what for women at peak dose is somewhere in a healthy female, you know, 35 to 70. And it's so, so I had a woman coming in with signs of hyperanternism. You know, she's, you know, deep voice, hair growth, whatever acne. And I'm going to check a level of it's above 90. For females, I need to look for a tumor. Like that's too high, okay? Or PCOS, it can get that high. Certainly above 200. That's, that's outrageous.

So I'm trying to get my patients, you know, 60, 50, 70, but if she's like 50 and her, she's got her libido back and she feels great and everything's wonderful, then I'm, hold, you know, because the higher we go, the more likely you already have side effects. So you're losing hair, you know, temporal hair loss, voice deepening, acne, new chin hair, you know, losing hair where you want it, gaining hair where you don't want it. This is how I explain it to patients.

And so when you say 50, that's 50 nanograms per deciliter. I think many people, including myself, were surprised to learn that women actually have higher levels of testosterone than they do estrogen outside of that. In absolute ranges, yeah. Right, in absolute ranges. And I can tell you right now, your natural level of estradiol is higher than mine. Now I'm supplement, but, you know, like when I go through menopause, your residual estradiol is now higher than a postmanopausal woman.

So this is the estradiol that I have because testosterone was aromatized into estrogen. Yeah. Interesting. Interesting. So much is breaking down around the, the old stereotypes of testosterone and men and estrogen. Yeah, testosterone is a human hormone. Estrogen is a human hormone. And they exist in both biological sexes. And that's, it's sometimes unfortunate that compounds in the body get names like steroid hormones because then people hear steroids.

Yeah. And it has a gravitational pull toward anabolic steroid use. Or even the word fat, you know, it's like, you know, dietary fat versus subcutaneous fat versus, you know, it's a negative foundation. It's a better nomenclature to avoid a lot of the confusion that exists out there.

But there's some of the other hormones that can be reduced and can possibly be replaced by hormone therapy, like progestines, you know, are there, is there a role for, you know, adjusting things like prolactin or is there, is there a role for other hormones in that what sure is to be a multifactorial thing? Right. I mean, I think menopause is a process, not an event. Hypogonatism for females, right?

And so we know that, you know, because the pituitary and hypothalamus are involved and that GNRH, you know, there's some cross reactivity. So for example, hypothyroidism, when I have a patient who's on her and doing well on hormone therapy for her thyroid, so she's on T3, T4, whatever she's on, I'm like, listen, you know, we need to recheck your thyroid levels in six weeks because giving you back estrogen is going to mess with a little bit of that feedback cycle.

So we need to make sure you're still therapeutic. So I think we've got more work to do with some of the other hormones. But when we talk about replacement in menopause, we are mostly looking at your estrogen, your androgens, and your progesterone. So the formulations can differ.

But we, you know, there's a lot of misunderstanding around what is bioidentical versus synthetic, and I think a lot of cottage industries in this little bubble that we had for 23 years where doctors were afraid to prescribe hormone therapy. And then women were desperate for care. We had some little cottage industries of people.

I think we're well-meaning and trying to help, but kind of develop terminology that really isn't medically specific, like estrogen dominance, you know, and what that really is. And so that is not a term that isn't any medical journal. It's kind of something coined, I think, from a well-meaning provider trying to explain what's happening in parimenopause that you're having more estrogen produced than progesterone than you used to have.

So a PCO patient to do the same thing, you know, there's multiple reasons for that to happen. So when we talk about, you know, in the miniverse of what we're trying to replace, we all agree that we stick pretty much with estradiol, we're just trying to give you back the water you were drinking. So I want to get as close to what your body used to make because that's what the receptors like.

I'm trying to give you progesterone, you know, rather than a synthetic, not that they're all demonized, progesterone doesn't work for everyone. I'm glad I have options. And then for your angrogens, we pretty much just do testosterone and we do a transdermal again because the oral can be hepatotoxic unless it's undecan-08, which isn't available in the US. But there's no FDA approved option for women, so it's not covered by insurance.

We know it works for hypoectip-sexual desire disorder, what your follow-up call libido. We think we know that the testosterone, yeah, women at the highest quartile of testosterone have better bone density and stronger muscles. So I'm using it off label for my patients who come in with osteoporosis, osteophenia or sarcopenia. I'm using it off label telling them this is a, probably a, it's not a hill marry, we think it works, but we don't have the, you know, it's not approved for that yet yet.

We know it has receptors in the brain. My patients are saying that they're more clarity of thought, they're sleeping better, they really, really like the testosterone. So there's, you know, DHEA, there's a great vaginal preparation for DHEA called introsa and then the receptors there will start converting it into both testosterone and esteridiot, you know, through the process.

And so the sexual medicine docs really like introsa, especially for breast cancer patients because they get that little boost of testosterone in the vulva. Introsa. Introsa is the brand name. I think it's prostarone, prostarone. And this is a prescription drug. Yeah, these are prescriptions. So introsa's prescription DHEA was specifically formulated for the vagina. But it, which sits further upstream to the production of testosterone and estrogen. Right.

And so fortunately, what's left in the vagina is able to, you know, plug that guy in and get it to produce both testosterone and esteridiot. Which testosterone is the immediate precursor. We have to romanticize it, right, to make esteridiot in females as well. These local effects on tissues are interesting. I, they make perfect sense if the highest concentration is at the site of release from the, from the patch or the gel or the, whatever, the, the, the, you said introvagional. What is it?

It's like a capsule. I think the prostarone is a insert, like a little gel looking, not a gel, but a, I forget what the binding material is. But it's like a little insert you put in. Okay. Local effects, because I guess, you know, it's, it's, it's, it's a reason that the highest concentration is, it can be at the site of the thing that's releasing the hormone. But then it also goes systemic by getting into the blood.

Especially so the, the local formulations eat the, the prostarone and the, the, the eteroza and as well as the estradiol formulated for the vagina do not absorb systemically. They're so low dose, they have not been clinically significant tissue absorption. I have a formulation for my face as well. So it's a cream. A cream that I put on my face, it's estriol. And so there's some decent studies with estriol, but we lose 30% of our collagen.

It's a very big pain point for women when they get them in a pause that we lose so much collagen so quickly in the first five years of menopause. And so we can slow that process down. We can't stop it completely. We can slow it down by using a topical estrogen and the topical really seems to help with the elastin concentrations as well. Interesting. So you, you will often prescribe a lot of local treatments for hormone. Yes. And really it's so safe.

So we can take breast cancer off the table, all the discussion around blood clots and everything. Everyone can use vaginal estrogen and they should. And I'll tell you why. Starting at what age relative to menopause? You know, the old menopause thoughts do not give vaginal estrogen until she's symptomatic. Now all of us will become symptomatic from GSM. So that's genital urinary syndrome of menopause.

So from the pubic bone, all the way to the sacrum, all of that tissue is heavily tied to estrogen to testosterone. And when those levels decline, we see thinning of the tissue, loss of elasticity, loss of mucus production, as well as the health of the urethra. And so UTIs, like the best treatment for recurrent UTIs in a menopausal patient is vaginal estrogen. It's not recurrent antibiotics. And what about, um, so it's preventative?

And we can probably keep 50% of women out of the ER and out of ureosepsis. If we gave them all prophylactic vaginal estrogen, all these ladies in nursing homes should be on vaginal estrogen. So just to protect them from getting ureosepsis. Interesting. What about, um, like urinary incontinence and some of these other symptoms that are associated with more elasticity, presumably more elasticity of tissue in that region.

If you're early in us, so we have stress incontinence and then we have, um, overactive bladder urgent incontinence. And so it definitely helps with urgent incontinence. It relax, you know, it helps to relax and decrease the inflammation in the wall of the bladder. So that thumbs up there. So people are getting up at night and having that urge to go. But stress incontinence is an anatomical problem. We've lost, you know, the, the sling that holds up the urethra and the female fails, right?

And then we have some herniation and, and poor tissue health. We can build up that health and we, you know, there's physical therapy. There's lots of options and you, you know, no urogonicologist wants to take a woman to the OR to do a lift. If she's not estrogensized, they're all going to get vaginal estrogen pre, you know, through healing and then forever to keep the tissue healthy.

Everything that we've been talking about for about the last 15 or 20 minutes seems to go directly opposite this large scale study that was discussed at the Watergate Hotel. Is your read that the medical establishment in particular, the OBGYNs in the US and in other countries, understand now that that study was flawed to some extent in its design or is what we're talking about here, like really cutting edge.

I mean, we were to gather a room full of 1000 OBGYNs trained in various decades and maybe 10% would have any idea. Here's why and I'm going to call out the American Board of OBGYNs directly on this.

We take our board certification exams every year and our specialty as every specialty does and they give us a set of articles of the cutting edge, newest research and it's divided into categories, obstetrics, office practice, gynecology, GYN surgery, pediatrics, on call it, you know, there is no menopause category, nothing. So I went back over like 10 years of all my green journals and looked at how many articles were anything to do with menopause and it was less than 1%.

So they were not systematically trying to put the latest menopause information in front of us. They don't even recognize the menopause society as a entity. Well, now they have to contend with the menopause. They do. They might, you might see me ban from the A-Bot, but you know what? No, no, no. I'm so proud of what I learned. I learned amazing things. I am a boss, a delivering a baby, a taking care for pregnant patient. I am great at pediatric gynecology.

I was so good without lessons where I failed and where this, I let the system let me fail was in the care of a woman after reproduction outside of surgery, outside of her surgical needs. Well, I have to imagine that given the medical profession is interested in the well-being of people and in the discussion today, women that they will be grateful that now you have a microphone, many microphones in various contexts.

So that is surprising to me, however, I would think that given the exciting findings around hormone replacement therapy and the, I'm kind of obvious, at least when you describe them to me, obvious flaws in these earlier studies of, you know, starting hormone replacement therapy when women are already 61, when they've already accumulated in many cases some health issues that it would be kind of obvious. You miss the ability to measure the protective benefits.

So, but fortunately, we've got great studies coming out of like the Danish data, the Scandinavian data, that are really looking at this again and showing the protective benefits. So. Is it generally the case that the studies out of Europe and Scandinavia are more forward thinking? It depends. You know, some of the most forward thinking, shockingly, is come out of Asia, a lot out of China.

And I asked my husband, he's worked there before and he said, there's as many researchers in China that are female as male. It's not like they have a big stay at home culture, you know, they're not, women are expected to work and they're getting PhDs and they're doing the research. And so, and he thinks in his, in of one, his humble opinion, and he's an engineer, you know, that, that's what I was like, why do you think you've worked over there?

He goes, I think because there's just as many women who are writing the papers as men. Interesting take. I like it. It makes good sense. What are the various things that people can do in terms of non-hormonal replacement therapies that can support them through really into and through parimenopause and menopause? Have you talked about nutrition earlier? Maybe we could touch on that a little bit more. We talked about behaviors, resistance training, maintaining, maybe even increasing muscle mass.

There's no pressure to include them, but what about the very supplements that we hear about that can touch on or we are told can touch on these hormone pathway things like dim, things like grape seed extracts, things like, you know, evening primrose. I don't think they're harmful, but there's just not robust data to really support. So, menopause society went and looked at all of them, even soy and everything.

And they just, outside of cognitive behavioral therapy, which can be helpful, but it's not a menopause cure, they didn't find much in the supplement world that would stop. Remember, we're defining menopause as hot flashes in general, urinary syndrome of menopause. So, you know, when I'm recommending supplements to patients, I do think there's some okay data on turmeric for maybe hot flashes, but I'm not saying to take that instead of, replacing the estrogen your body is missing greatly.

I like the anti-inflammatory benefits of, you know, of that supplement. I'm recommending fiber, 80% of my patients are deficient in vitamin D and struggling to get it absorbed. You know, I'm recommending creatine for muscle. I'm recommending there's a specific bioactive collagen that was studied in menopause one with osteoporosis where they saw improvement in bone density. So I'm recommending a weighted vest.

Weight studies elderly women, but saw improvements in bone density and I'm like, why do we wait until we're osteoporotic to make the diagnosis? Yeah, this is interesting. So weighted vest. Weight of vest. They lived at creatine, weight of vest, vibratory training in nursing home dwellings so they were kind of a population where they couldn't go anywhere. Vibratory training is the shake plate. The shake plate.

And so, you know, anything that stimulates that musculoskeletal unit will send the signal to get stronger. You know, what must women don't realize? I mean, they know about osteoporosis, right, and they don't want to have it, but they don't understand that like your habits and your 30s and 40s are going to put you on that path. And that your body is going to fight to lose muscle and bone naturally through the aging process and accelerated with menopause.

It doesn't have to be that way, but you have to do the work, you know, and there's some hacks. And so I love the weight of vest for a hack. I'm like, do the dishes with it on. Go walk the dog. You know, like how heavy? So you want in the nursing home, they started at 10% of their body weight. So I'm like 10 pounds, 12 pounds, start with that. So now my husband's obsessed and we have six of them and they go from eight to 35 pounds, you know, so I have different weights that I wear.

Like if I'm doing leg day, I'll put the heavier one on so I'll have to hold as heavy. So you'll use a weight vest when you're doing leg day. Wow. So I can't, because I don't have great grip strength and, you know, and so it'll help me be able to squat heavier, you know, but now I'm getting better. I've got the bar going. So I'm getting there, you know, I'm telling my sister and my mom this. Yeah. I've got my sister, yeah, doing some resistance training. It's been, and it's just a cheat.

I'm so, it's so cute on social because they'll post and tag me and they're walking their dog. They're doing whatever with their weight of vest on and now in Galveston where I live, you can't go, you see it all over the sea while everyone's walking with their weight of vest. I love it. And it's hot down there a lot of year. Yeah, it's warm. So no excuses, people outside of Texas or in Texas for that matter, but my experience is that people in Texas don't tend to make excuses.

Anyway, that's, I said like a real California in here. We're talking about this a little bit earlier in female specific weight vest. I would love to develop one because the ones were made for men and they're okay, but if you have larger breasts, it's hard with a snap. Sorry to get it on right. And I know there's a big trend with rucking, but that puts all the weight on your back.

And I really like the weighted vest because I feel and this is my opinion really, but that, you know, the reason why it's helping with their bone density is it's putting the weight on the entire axial skeleton rather than just the muscles on your back. They were putting the force more evenly supported. And so, but some of my followers have written in and said they're struggling because they have larger breasts and how to get this around.

I'm like, I got to make one that's going to accommodate, you know, have longer, you know, to strap down here underneath the breast. So, yes, I want you to develop that. You should develop that. Not that you don't already have enough on your plate already. Along the topic, I like rucking. It is sort of backloaded by definition. Some of the weight vests that are out there are evenly distributed in a way that makes them pretty comfortable.

They're not all loaded up up front like a special operator or something would wear. So, positive effects of the weight vest would be increased bone density. You're doing lower work. You're burning a little more calories, right? You're doing more work. You're getting stronger, but I coached to it, you know, with my followers for this is part of my osteoporosis prevention pack. Are you willing to share a few other things that are in the production pack?

So, you know, eating adequate protein, doing resistance training, wearing your weight of vest, creatine, five grams a day, where most of the studies were done in the women. Creatine monohydrate. Monohydrate, yeah. And then that collagen, consider that collagen, full disclosure, I do sell that one, but really good investment, I think. Maybe we can talk about collagen for a moment. It's a complete protein. No. No. I think one or two amino acids. So it's not a complete protein.

It's better than none. So I do like include my collagen in my protein intake for the day because I eat all animal based protein pretty much. So, I figured I'm covered my basis to have, you know, 10% of it coming, which is missing two amino acids, or I think it's one valley. I have to look it up. So. And what are the specific effects of a quality collagen? So, you know, there's a lot of controversy there. I've seen the videos.

It is broken down into its component amino acids, you know, through the digestion process. But the first ones I looked at were totally frivolity. I was changing bathing, I was trying on bathing suits with my daughter who was a little girl at the time. And I was complaining about the appearance of my cellulite, even thin people have cellulite. And so, oh, mommy, it doesn't look that bad.

And I, you know, scientist in me was like, goes on PubMed and starts looking up articles on cellulite and how to decrease the appearance of it. And so, I found these articles on something called Verisol. And it was a collagen made in Germany and they'd studied, actually, done like really high-quality studies, like laser measuring wrinkles and cellulite. Termins are precise. And they, and it looked, they had positive outcomes. I'm like, well, it won't hurt me. So, I ordered sign.

Google, where do I find this Verisol collagen? I find this company out, order it. And then one day I talked about it on the internet. And the company called me and said, would you please let us know when you do that? Because they sold out. Of their supply for like three months. So the same like manufacturer of that particular Verisol made this fortabone, did the studies five years doing bone density scans on these women. It was a small study, but they saw improvements.

We know what happens to bone density if you do nothing. It goes down. These went up. And I thought, okay, I want to do, and I want to offer this to people like, if not them, for me, this is a high quality product, I can, you know, and that's, so that's part of my, what I offer to people or what I recommend. You can get it anywhere. Other people sell it, not just me. Great. So, I'm perplexed. This isn't a challenge, but I'm perplexed.

What a protein that's not a complete protein, be beneficial for a body organ like skin, whereas the complete proteins don't seem to do it on their own. Nobody knows. Okay. I'm not studying the right thing, or they're not really looking at it. So, I don't know. That's great. When I hear, I don't know, the scientists in me says, great area for exploration. Great area for exploration.

Because we don't really believe, in fact, we don't believe that amino acids that are derived from, that are derived from a particular body part target that tissue. We've heard this argument before, Dr. Lane Norton, and I have both gone on record publicly saying there is basically zero, not basically, delete the basically.

There is zero evidence that when you ingest heart, let's say you like eating liver or heart or skeletal muscle, that somehow the amino acids are selectively trafficked to the organ of the heart or the liver or the skeletal muscle, there's no evidence of that whatsoever. Certainly not in humans. If there is evidence, I'm sure the last known the comment section on YouTube and let us know. But, yeah, it's perplexing why collagen would have a selectively beneficial effect on skin.

And they didn't study it versus a steak. They just looked at bone density if they took this product every day for five years and what happened. And they weren't having tremendous cardiometabolic disease. They weren't on bone building medications. They weren't on HRT. So they did it pretty clean. So it was not a huge study, but it was interesting and I thought, okay, I don't want to break because if I break my hip, well, 50% of women will have an osteoporotic fracture before they die.

50% what about men, do we know? Just by way of comparison. I think it's 25. Wow. But don't quote me on that. I need to look at one up. That's okay. So it's about half, okay? And then hip fracture, if you break that hip over the age of 65, you have your one-year mortality with surgical repair is 30%. If you're not healthy enough to have the repair, you can afford to have it. It's 79. Goodness. And that's what we're trying to avoid is that.

And the tremendous, if you've seen the women who have tremendous osteoporosis in their spine and just how their lives are so hard, how much pain they live in every single day. This, a lot of this is avoidable with being aggressive and intentional about this. And HRT can be a huge part of that as well.

I know I'm about to ask you as a little bit outside the box, but I feel fair asking it's given that I'm not a clinician, but I have some background and certainly understanding of neuro-generative conditions of the eye and vision. Have you ever observed in your patients that when they get on hormone replacement therapy for menopause, that things that are typically associated with aging, like diminished visual function, hearing, you mentioned tinnitus.

Also called tinnitus, I understand, but tinnitus, I think it's... We'll do both, tinnitus, tinnitus. And EG correct to be insid, tinnitus, I'll say okay. We'll do both. Here that they report seeing better, hearing better, and any kind of sensory improvement or offset of sensory loss. So we know the data is clear on dry eye and how that can affect, but how it affects like the optic nerve, you know, we know that estrogen is anti-inflammatory.

So any kind of like inflammatory condition in and around the eye does tend to get better, but we need, you know, probably more data in this area. For hearing, most of the research is around tinnitus and vertigo. So the rate of which the crystals break off in that your accelerates in menopause and people on HRT have less vertigo, new vertigo than they would have had before. And I forget what the path of physiology, I wrote it in the book, but I can't think of it right now.

But the physiology was behind why tinnitus increases in menopause, but it's due to the estrogen levels declining. You mentioned dry eye. A lot of people might hear dry eye and think, oh, no big deal. But actually dry eye is one of the most frustrating things to have. And it's a, I believe, a many billions of dollars of your industry to find treatments for dry eye. So does estrogen replacement therapy improve dry eye? It does seem to.

You have less incidents, most of the studies are just retroactive and they're looking at the incidents of those things on women HRT for other reasons or not. And they just see, especially like frozen shoulders, the best data there, I think. And what they see is a decreased risk of occurrence. And then if they do have it, they have a shorter duration and easier course, you know, easier to treat if they're on HRT. Fantastic.

So what are some of the cases where a woman can't or shouldn't do hormone replacement? Or replacement therapy in here where you think hormone replacement therapy is kind of a proxy for estrogen therapy? Yes. So any hormone sensitive cancer, one of the things a lot of women don't understand, if you have dysfunctional uterine bleeding that has not been evaluated, you should not start hormone therapy because we don't know if it's cancer.

So if you're having really have, especially if they're heavy bleeding, clots out of nowhere, you know, something unusual about the volume or the frequency of your bleeding, you need to go see a gynecologist and get that evaluated before you start hormone therapy. Okay. It may not be anything cancerous or tumors, it might just be the hormone changes, but that needs to be evaluated.

If known breast cancer, no, if you're actively having a blood clot that you're being treated for, they're saying, let's hold off until that therapy is over. Even if you've had a hormone sensitive cancer, including breast cancer, depending on the stage, the type and it's a very nuanced conversation, does not mean that you are automatically disqualified for hormone therapy after your treatment. So that is one of the biggest misconceptions out there.

If you have really severe liver disease, I'm not talking about mild fatty liver disease, lots of menopausal women have that, and it does tend to get better with HRT. If you have severe liver disease, that is where estrogen begins to be metabolized, and so you could have abnormal metabolism, you don't want that. So that's going to keep you from being a candidate. Do you think we're seeing or at least hearing about, in my case, PCOS, polycystic ovarian syndrome so much more?

Is it because people are aware? Is it because? I think two reasons. One, the obesity epidemic had led to more PCOS. That is definitely a risk factor for insulin resistance is usually the main path of physiologic cause behind PCOS. I'm a PCOS, then PCOS suffer, so I had it my whole reproductive life. But you're not obese at all. No, no, they missed it forever. I was just stressed out medical student. Which can potentially cause PCOS? With acne.

Yeah, I mean, you can have, PCOS is a symptom of something biologically apparent. Turns out I'm insulin resistant, which is why I, you know, even though I'm thin. And so we've had higher, increasing levels of obesity, which is a risk factor for that. So people are talking about it and writing books about a care and tang just published. It's not hysteria. It's not hysteria. And she's a gynecologic surgeon does a lot of work around endometriosis.

So she have like huge chapters on PCOS and how to advocate for yourself and, you know, all about the disease process so people understand. Interesting. What are some of the primary treatments for PCOS? Is it going to be blocking endrogens? So yes. And so for me, you know, in all my training, it was always put them on birth control because it was, it, it will suppress ovulation and suppress the overproduction of androgens in their system.

So I was a very happy birth control patient because I was thin. For the obese patients, if we can help them lose weight, it does tend to, they start ovulating again. And so now with the new GLP ones, a lot of PCOS will probably resolve itself. And they'll start ovulating again and go back to normal cycles. That's the pregnancies that are happening from GLP ones. I see. So GLP one associated pregnancy. GLP one babies.

Yeah. We saw a surge of that when all the patients, the obese patients were getting the gastric bypasses, then they get pregnant. And so we were advising them to not be pregnant until their weight was stable for a year after surgery because of the medical implications of nutrition and pregnancy. But they were getting, you know, they were so excited and cute. And now they're libido's up and they're, you know, getting pregnant and never really needed contraception before.

And just assume they'd still have trouble. And so now they're ovulating and getting pregnant. And we're seeing the same thing with GLP ones. So anyone listening out there who's prescribing a GLP one, please talk to your female patients about contraception if they don't want to be pregnant. Very interesting and admittedly unforeseen implications of GLP one. As long as we're there, what are your thoughts on a Zempoch Moncharo? I think that they can be a really important tool for a lot of patients.

I don't think they're for everyone. I don't think people are being counseled adequately. A lot of them. I mean, in my area outside of Galveston where I live, there are med spots giving out GLP ones. And as far as I can tell, they're just giving them the meds and sending them out the door. I've had patients coming in on it who were never counseled about the potential for muscle loss. So when I look at a patient's health, I look at a 30 year plan, right?

And so they come in with a lifelong history usually of having a weight problem and a fat problem. And here's this medication that's going to take the food noise away and help them focus on the habits that are going to keep them healthy longer. So I do have patients that I've prescribed it to. We have a very long discussion about adequate protein intake, resistance training. I have a way to measure their muscle mass.

We are tracking that every month for them, every month to six weeks while they're on the medication. So women who are on HRT with the GLP one have a 30% increase weight loss. Wow. Yeah. Yeah, I appreciate that you mentioned that the use of ozemic mojaro is not mutually exclusive with resistance training and improved nutrition. No, I think it shows up on social media sort of like people assume, well, you know, you gotta take great care of yourself and exercise. Well, great.

But there are also a number of people that are carrying excess weight to the point where they are at risk of injury when they exercise. I mean, everyone's at risk of injury when they exercise. But what I'm hearing is that you basically take the view, whatever can get people in a kind of forward center of mass around management of blood insulin levels, etc. Right. Because it wasn't that the original FDA approval was, yeah, it was diabetes type 2 diabetes. Type 2 diabetes.

And there's also some data as I recall that ozemic mojaro can reduce alcohol cravings. So yeah, the reward center in the brain are the noise. So they're looking now, I guess, my friends who are like obesity medicine specialists and are all like reading every study that comes out.

Any kind of impulsive behavior or reward seeking behavior, gaming, gambling, alcohol, you know, people are tending to do less of those behaviors because whatever the, whatever's being blocked in the brain and you know more of us than I do, seems to help with that. Those drives. That's interesting that the hypothalamus is chocoblockful of neurons associated with all sorts of drives and temperature regulation.

You mentioned earlier, you know, the preoptic area of the, of the hypothalamus involved in temperature regulation. And we've always viewed those as somewhat separate, but they're actually quite interconnected. And so I'm not entirely surprised that a drug that would reduce cravings for food might also reduce cravings for other things. It's going to be really interesting to see what the science and the animal models in human shows us over time. It's definitely happening.

I mean, this is, has it hit a trillion dollar industry? Yes, probably hundreds of billions of dollars. I know that the majority of big research and funding is being funneled into this. Maybe not all for the right reasons, but the obesity medicine specialist who are kind of who I turn to for how do I do this? How do I do it right?

How do I not hurt someone just to get them to lose weight, you know, and are very excited because these new levels, they say it's like the iPhone 12, the iPhone 13, like they're just going to get better and better with lower side effects, better profiles, you know, as time goes on. That we're going to look back at the Monjaro and these earlier meds and be like, oh my God, what were we doing, you know, because of the side effects?

Well, if nothing else, they're very interesting to pay attention to because it's clearly in the cultural zeitgeist right now. So every once in a while, when a guest for whom the topic is of immense interest coming on the podcast, I'll put out a call on social media for questions. And so if you're willing, I'd like to just ask you a few of the audience questions. And we can treat these as rapid fire or as much depth as you like.

First off, many of the questions you've already answered, things like what is the role for testosterone replacement therapy in women as opposed to just estrogen replacement therapy?

But one of the more common questions in here that we've touched on, but I think could deserve a bit more attention is, you know, if a woman is in her 60s and has already gone through menopause, is it appropriate for her to consider or at least just talk to her doctor about hormone replacement therapy or is she putting herself at risk? There's definitely worth the conversation.

So if I have a patient who comes in and she's more than 10 years past her menopause or over the age of 60 and has not been on HRT, then we start looking at risk factors for cardiovascular disease or stroke. And so we're looking at her blood pressure, her lipids, her cholesterol and triglycerides and looking for things that are going to put her at higher risk. She's lost probably the maximum cardiovascular benefit, but we don't want to put estrogen on top of severe atherosclerotic disease.

So if she has abnormal cholesterol, I'm going to center for a calcium cardiac score. I want to see if there's calcified plaques around her heart. I may even if if stroke is a risk, we may even center for an ultrasound, you know, looking at the intumal thickness of the carotid.

So if those are normal or low risk, then we will talk about the benefits of what would the benefits be for her after the age of 60, where we probably lost the best of the cardiovascular protection, but it will always protect her bones. It will always protect her general urinary system. It will always protect her skin. I mean, there's things that estrogen will do for us forever. And so and then let her make the decision.

Certainly if she's still symptomatic, meaning hot flashes or things we can easily identify that we know estrogen will help with. But you know, that first 10 year window is kind of critical for the preventative benefits, but it doesn't mean she's not going to benefit forever. Now when do we stop? Used to be doctors make up numbers, three, ten years, whatever.

If she's been on it since early in her menopause and has not developed any of these diseases and she wants to keep going, we're going to keep her on. I will probably die with my estradiol patch on. If I don't develop a reason to take it off, because I know it's protecting me in so many levels and I want to keep that going. And so many ways it sounds very similar to testosterone replacement therapy and men, the ideas that people go on and don't. Yeah, but why would you stop at 70?

Why would you do that? Right. You know, if you didn't develop a contraindication to it. Very clear and potentially very actionable answer. Thank you. A number of the questions related to the relationship between menopause, hormone therapy and mental health, mental well-being.

Let's just keep it simple for now and ask what are the things that women can do in order to optimize or their mental health in perimenopause and menopause and that they can do to offset any mental health issues that might arise during perimenopause and menopause. There's a reason why I asked about those two things separately. One is just to try and get a poked. Perry is very different in menopause for mental health. So it was a great question.

So I just went to a menopause conference in Chicago and there was a whole section on mental health and it was neuroscientist, psychiatrist and menopause specialist all up there discussing the latest data. It was so fascinating and so there really is a big difference as far as mental health for what's happening in perimenopause and what's happening postmenopause.

And as we talked about earlier in perimenopause, we have that hormonal zone of chaos and we see this, you know, in the Australian data, it's a four times risk of mental health disorders, especially depression. And then in postmenopause, a lot of these things tend to stabilize or get better probably because just the estrogen is bottomed out and the brain is not having to deal with these fluctuations.

So we think that the data is looking like the best treatment for the mental health issues in perimenopause is going to be estrogen for stabilization and not the traditional SSRIs SNRIs, you know, the antidepressants and the anxiety meds. Not incidentally, one of the more common questions was in this case very specifically worded. I've been on HRT for five years and I'm 61. I feel great, but how long is it, quote unquote, okay to be on them? Seems like I hear conflicting opinions.

Well, we just heard a very straightforward opinion. Yeah. So thank you for that. As long as you're still healthy. How can I stop waking up in the middle of the night? This is a problem since entering menopause. So we see sleep disruptions definitely from not only from the vasomotor symptoms, which will wake you up, okay? We can get those under control. You know, your sleep function should not be affected by that.

What we're seeing though is people, even with HRT, even with estrogen, are still having middle of the night awakenings or racing thoughts or having to get up to pee or something in the middle of the night and they can't go back to bed, usually because their brain is going on. What we found is that progestin, probably through the effects of GABA, is very effective at settling your brain down and allowing for sleep.

So I'm having my patients take their progesterone orally at night before they go to bed and we're seeing better sleep with that. And that was also something covered in detail. It was so excited by the neuroscientists as part of her area of research that they are showing clearly and she can point to the neurosurperseptors of where that's happening. That progesterone seems to be really protected for our sleep. Now, take hormones off the table.

Sleep hygiene is still hugely important and I need to see the studies to prove it, but I'm telling you, we do not tolerate alcohol like we did pre-menopausal. Women are in at least 90 percent. Every time I post about it online, I see thousands of comments of, I quit, I had to give it up, I cannot sleep. And even in my own life, if I choose socially to have more than a glass of wine, I am giving up sleep. Like it is a choice. I'm choosing not to sleep that night.

I will wake up to 23, 335, whatever time in the morning sweating and I'm like, you know, too much champagne at New Year's or whatever. So, you know, that is a choice and it's something I counsel my patients about. You probably can't tolerate alcohol like you used to aging the factor here, our body composition changes and there's probably something hormonally that's going on. We don't understand yet, but like you choose this, you're going to choose not to sleep more than likely. Interesting.

I wonder whether or not estrogen modulates the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme, but time will tell. It happens in the day to yet, but I'm sure it's coming. Here's an interesting one. How can men help their female loved ones navigate these stages? Yeah. You get that question a lot. It's great. And it always comes on the, when I'm being interviewed by a male, you know, when I'm interviewed by a female, they're wonderful, but they have their own experience and they have to talk about it.

And that's fine. That's my job, you know, is women have to unpack their menopause trauma to me. But the men are just so curious and just have so many questions and then how can I support a partner and or my mom or whomever in my life who's dealing with this. One is, is acknowledged that this is happening and try to educate yourself. There's my book, other books.

There's lots of information now on the internet about the subject, but she is going through a transition that is rocking her world more than likely and is affecting her brain, her bones, her heart, her kidneys, her skin, her ability to relate, her ability to tolerate. It's probably going to affect your relationship in some way. Go there with her. Go to the appointments with her. Be there to advocate for her.

You know, be a partner through this with her because you will get her back, but it's going to take, you know, changing the way that you address things. A couple of questions about, quote, how to rekindle libido. Oh, yeah. This person in particular says, it's packed its bags and moved out since they started menopause. They're reporting their individual experience, but you touched on testosterone therapy earlier.

Any woman in her menopause journey at any time, there's a 50% sexual dysfunction rate, meaning she's not happy with whatever's going on. Now when we look at the buckets where sexual function fall into, we have orgasmic disorder. Now in menopause, when we lose blood flow to the area, people can have delayed orgasms or less, the peak of the orgasm is lower, less vibrant orgasms for lack of a better word. They have decreased blood flow to the area. They lose elasticity. So pain is another bucket.

You know, it hurts. The skin gets torn. It's very fragile. It's very friable. So vaginal estrogen therapy can help there. There is arousal disorders where you want to do it, but the blood's not getting where it needs to go. So you're not having all the arousal type symptoms. So sometimes, the viagras, the identify, the topical, the identify can be helpful there. But the most common thing that women have is of course, relationship disorder. You don't love your partner. You don't feel supported.

It's going to be hard to... Relationship disorder. Yeah. Relationship disorder. But then HSDD is hyperactive sexual desire disorder. That's in the brain. And so first thing I ask is, did you use to have a good libido or a drive? Yes. And you have a good relationship with your partner. It doesn't hurt. With the rule out, the other things, that's where testosterone comes into play. That is those patients. It does tend to help. There are two FDA-approved medications for libido. One is Vilece.

It's an injection. You give yourself and actually works for men as well, about 30 minutes before. It's in the alpha-malanocytes stimulating hormone pattern. Yeah. And then there is Adi, ADDYI, works at the level, I think of dopamine, in the brain. So it's more in the family of SSRIs, you know, so it affects neurotransmitter. And so you take that every day. And it works. It was only studied in pre-menopausal women, but it does, you know, it's modest, but it does seem to have an effect.

So but most of my patients, because testosterone has so many other benefits, you and the cost, to get it compounded in Texas is maybe 30 bucks a month, so it's really reasonable. And the Vilece and the Adi can be very expensive and usually not covered by insurance. So because of cost and potential other effects, most of my patients choose testosterone if it's HSDD. Let's see. This is a question about the side effects associated with estradiol, a hormone replacement therapy.

In this particular instance. And the person says, what are the best alternatives to estradiol? I've tried tiny amounts and the side effects in this case, skin rashes and hives are what they are describing. So I wonder if it's the patch. So there's a certain percentage of patients who it's not the estradiol, it's actually the adhesive in the patch. They will have a reaction to it. So one is try and alternative form.

Another thing that one of the members on my team saw in her chat group is they get the flow nasal, corticone nasal spray over the counter and they spray it on and let it dry. Then they put the patch on and it decreases the risk of the reaction to the glue. I don't know if that lasts forever, but I thought that was a cool thing to know about. What I typically do for my patients is change them to an alternative form. Interesting. Thank you for that.

They went on to ask about trying a new supplement called EQL. EQULE. I think I read about that one again. I don't know what's in EQL. Again, not really robust studies, but most of these things are not harmful, but you may just, it may be a little snake oil, you know, throw anybody away. Really the thing that's going to fix the problem for most women is restoring your estradiol.

Yeah, because there were other questions about, you know, wild yam and things more in the supplement space as well as things like acupuncture and herbal medicine. So acupuncture can really be helpful. But again, it's hard to access and can be expensive for a lot of patients. It's not treating the root cause, but it definitely can help you deal with some of the symptoms and make you more comfortable.

And then last question, how best to attack and hear them quoting, attack the fat distribution problem at this time? Yeah, you need a multi-factoral approach to visceral fat. So nutrition, exercise, women on HRT have less visceral fat, you know, those are kind of the key things. And the way you approach your nutrition with the exercise, with the stress reduction, getting those quarters all level down, are going to make you healthier in every other way as well.

Great. Well, Dr. Mary Claire, thank you so much for giving us just a wealth of knowledge about paramanopause, menopause, really explaining what those are clearly for the first time on this podcast. And really illustrating the things that people can do to think about these stages of life and to, I don't know if I should say tackle or to dance with the stage of life, whatever term one prefers in order to offset the negative effects.

And it sounds like, in fact, it's very clear based on what you've told us that there are real levers of control, including hormone replacement therapy, but other things as well, nutrition, exercise. It sounds like when we put all these together, there's almost like a mindset around paramanopause and menopause that you are promoting, which is one of real agency. This is not something that is going to bury us mentally and physically. That's something that really can be worked with.

And I just want to say on behalf of myself, because I've learned so much from you here, and the listeners and viewers of the podcast, thank you for the information today. Thank you for your clinical work. Thank you for your ongoing research into this area for attending these conferences and learning so much about it. You can bring us the latest. And thanks for your public education efforts, because they are really making a tremendous difference. Thank you.

Thank you for joining me for today's discussion with Dr. Mary Claire Haver. To learn more about her work, please see the link to her website in the show note caption, as well as the link to her terrific book, The New Menopause, Navigating Your Path Through Hormonal Change with Purpose, Power, and the Facts. If you're learning from Endor and join this podcast, please subscribe to our YouTube channel and follow us on both Spotify and Apple. That's a terrific zero cost way to support us.

In addition, you can leave us up to a five star review. Please also check out the sponsors mentioned at the beginning and throughout today's episode. That's the best way to support this podcast. And if you have questions for me or comments about the podcast or guests or topics that you'd like me to consider for the Hubertman Lab podcast, please put those in the comment section on YouTube. I do read all the comments.

If you're not already following me on social media, I am Hubertman Lab on all social media platforms. So that's Instagram X formerly known as Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, and threads. And on all those platforms, I discuss science and science related tools, some of which overlaps with the content of the Hubertman Lab podcast, but much of which is distinct from the content on the Hubertman Lab podcast. Again, that's Hubertman Lab on all social media channels.

If you haven't already subscribed to our neural network newsletter, our neural network newsletter is a zero cost monthly newsletter that includes podcast summaries, as well as protocols in the form of brief one to three page PDFs that cover everything from neuroplasticity and learning to how to improve your sleep to optimizing dopamine, deliberate cold exposure, deliberate heat exposure. We have a foundational fitness protocol, all of which is available at completely zero cost.

To sign up, you simply go to HubertmanLab.com, go to the menu tabs, scroll down to newsletter, and enter your email. And I should mention that we do not share your email with anybody. Thank you once again for joining me for today's discussion about Perry Menopause and Menopause with Dr. Mary Claire Haver. And last, but certainly not least, thank you for your interest in silence.