The volume. All right, we'll go to Hoops today. You're at the volume. Happy Wednesday, everybody. Hope all you guys are having a great week. We are continuing our player rankings today, moving into our top five and the final player in our second tier, Superstar Tier number five, Anthony Edward's going to be doing a deep dive on him
today at the tail end of the show. Today, I'm going to go through every single player in this five through fourteen group, the second tier of superstars, and for the younger guys, I want to talk about what I think their peak can be one day. And for the older guys, I want to talk about what their peak was, look at the specific stretch of their career, where they were playing, the best basketball that they played, and where they stacked up in the league at that point in time.
Should be a fun little exercise at the tail end of the show, you guys, before we get started, to subscribe to The Hoops and my YouTube channel so you don't miss any more of our videos. Follow me on Twitter, Underscore JCNLTS. You guys, don't miss sho announcements. Don't forget about a podcast feed wherever you get your podcast. Unders Under hoops tonight. It's also super helpful if you leave
a rating and a review on that front. Jackson's doing a great work on our social media feeds Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and TikTok. Make sure you guys follow us there and the last but not at least keep dropping mail bag questions in those YouTube comments. We'll get to him in our Friday mail bags over the course of the remainder of the offseason. All right, let's talk some basketball. So it's funny because I put ants at number five last year,
and that was probably it was two things. It was the pick that I got caught the most shit for, and I would argue it was one of the bigger mistakes that I made with that list. Again, the rankings are supposed to predict who will be the most valuable player in that coming season, and I thought Jason Tatum in retrospect after watching last year, pretty clearly was the
fifth best player in the league. Last year, I thought, at you know, in a lot of ways took a big leap and many ways moved up the ladder, but in the postseason in particular, continued to show some of the flaws that you expect from a player. His age, which are going to do a lot of talking about today, but in retrospect, that was one of my bigger mistakes last year was putting ant up at five. It should
have been Jason Tatum. But as I look at this season, landed with antet number five, and I think it's the right spot for him in this coming season. He's the most reliable player in the league by a mile in terms of availability, which we'll talk about in a minute. He took a massive leap in both scoring volume and efficiency last year. He's in a phase of his career where we can expect substantial improvement year over year, and I think in particular, his struggles against Oklahoma City were
very informative for him in his player development. Again, we're going to spend a good amount of time talking about that today. I think his playoff shortcomings are a little overstated because he's basically been amazing outside of the two Western Conference final series, and he's basically just struggling with the highest levels of playoff basketball right now, which is pretty typical for a superstar in his early twenties. The way that Anthony Edwards is so like those shortcomings made
it a close call for me. Was Steph, but I ended up landing on Ant at the number five spot, and I feel pretty good about it this year. I was a year two early with it last year, but I think this is where he falls in the league's hierarchy at this point in time. Let's look at last season in review, seventy nine games played for Anthony Edwards. He's played in seventy nine games three years in a row. He's played in at least seventy games every season of
his career. This is a crazy stat. Here's a list of players who missed more games just last season that Anthony Edwards has missed in the last three seasons combined. Excuse me, ah, I am under selling this. Here's a list of players who missed more games last season, just
last season, that Anthony Edwards has missed in his entire career. Luka, Doncic, Tyrese, Maxi Palla, Boncaro LaMelo, Ball, Anthony Davis, Kyrie Irving, Zion Williamson, Cam Thomas, Joel Embiid, John Morant, Brandon Ingram Kawhi, Leonard, Brandon Miller, Chris tops Porzingis, Lori, Markinen, John Collins, Jalen Johnson, Jayden Ivy Dejohon, Tay Murray, Emmanuel Quickly, Paul George, Jordan Clarkson, Jalen Suggs, Jared McCain, Jonathan gaminga, Mark Williams, chet Holmgren,
Aaron Gordon, Jeremy Grant, DeAndre Ayden, Aaron Nee Smith, Chris Middleton, and Herb Jones. Every single one of those dudes miss more games just last season that Anthony Edwards has missed in his entire career, and he's never missed a playoff game. So to put it very simply, he is by far the most dependable night to night superstar in the NBA
right now. He reminds me of a young Lebron in the sense that, like you'll see him turn the shit out of his ankle and you'll be watching the TV thinking there's no way he's gonna be good to keep playing, and then he's ripping through the defense to the rim
like ninety seconds later. It's a big upside for him on a list like this, Like we can talk about Anthony Edwards's ceiling and we're certainly going to today, but he is by far the most likely player in the league to at least be at or near his ceiling every night from October to late May or June, and that's a big feather in his cap on a list
like this. Ended up being the major differentiator for me, especially with that debate, was Steph, who I think is a better basketball player in the small sample still to this day. His averages last year in seventy nine games twenty eight points per game, six rebounds, and five assists with one point eight stocks, forty five percent from the field, forty percent from three to eighty four percent from the line,
massive increase in his three point volume last year. One of the things that I did predict correctly with Aunt last summer was that his newfound shooting stroke was real, and I predicted that he would shoot well that season, and he did. He just leaned into it almost comically. So with just the sheer amount of volume of three point shots that he was putting up, he was one of the top three to three point shooters in the league last year. He was number one in makes if
you were to include shot quality, volume efficiency. There were three guys who really separated themselves from the pack as three point shooters last year Steph Curry, Malik Beasley and Anthony Edwards. I would argue that Steph was the most impressive three point shooter last year, especially considering quality. I put Ant second in Malik Beasley third. So I thought Ant was the second most impressive three point shooter in the entire NBA last year. There's a big leap forward
for him in that very specific regard. That came with both upsides and downsides. Again, with the upsides and the downsides, they both fell in line with my basketball worldview. He gained in the form of large sample efficiency. This is a concept we've talked about a ton on this show. High volume three point shooting. Leaning your into that shot profile, you will gain in the form of large sample efficiency.
Very rarely well you see a player massively increase their scoring volume, all simultaneously increasing their efficiency, and Ant did. And the reason why is because of his three point volume. He went from twenty six points per game to a twenty eight points per game, and he logged from he went from fifty eight percent through shooting to sixty percent your shooting. So a substantial increase in volume and a substantial increase in efficiency because of that increase in three
point volume. Again, when you tilt your volume, your shot profile towards three point line. There is a lot to gain in large sample efficiency. But as I always say, skewing heavily towards three point shooting makes you highly susceptible to variants. And in the Thunder series in particular, Ant had three duds. He had a one for nine from three game, and he had two to one for seven from three games, and the Wolves lost all three of
those games. In fact, if you looked, you kind of zoomed out from the Wolves in their postseason run last year. There is a pretty clear correlation between his three point shooting and his team winning. When he shot over forty percent from three in the playoffs last year, they went seven to zero, and when he shot below thirty percent from three, they went one for five, one in five.
Excuse me. I think it would really benefit from better balance in his approach, and we'll talk more about that later, especially when we do a deep dive into OKC series. But one of the things that I'm counting on here for man is I do think he learned his lesson there. I do think we'll see more balance enhanced shot profile next season. Now let's look at the play type data. He was an excellent pick and roll player. Last year, he ran over twelve hundred of him and got one
point zero seven points per possession including passes. That was in the eighty first percentile. Being over one thousand reps puts you onto our high volume list as we go over every summer. He ranked seventh out of the thirteen players in the NBA last year to run at least one thousand pick and rolls. For Guy in his early twenties, big accomplishment for him. He shot extremely well of pick and roll. He was forty percent on pull up threes
out of ball screens on massive volume. Trey Young was the only NBA player last year to hit more threes out of pick and roll than Ant did, and Ant was the only player in the NBA to attempt at least two hundred pull up threes in ball screens and to make at least forty percent of them. That's obviously going to drive up his pick and roll scoring efficiency. Then he has a really good floater. He only takes about once a game, but he made forty nine percent
of his floaters last year. Gets nice and close to the basket, uses it as a deceleration move. He'll get like downhill into the defender's chest and then he'll like sidestep into a little floater that allows him to shoot before getting to the rim protector, which has been vitally important for him in some of the spacing issues that they've dealt with with Gobert really impressive scoring in the
ball screen situations. We're going to talk a little bit about Ant as a playmaker today, but the truth of the matter is he's very very much a traditional score archetype. Self awareness is key. Understand who you are when it comes to that top tier of playmaking. That's almost always something that you're born with. That's like a natural kind of like processing thing. With the way you see the floor.
That's not a death sentence. There are a lot of guys in NBA history who have been great as primarily scorers. You know, we were talking about that with Kevin Durant the other day. The other day. Michael Jordan is a example. That's why Ant gets kind of compared to him a lot. But like for An, it's not about becoming some surgical playmaker. It's just about making the necessary strides to be good
enough at it right. He'll make nice driving kick reads in ball screens, you'll see him elevate and rifle and opposite corner pass Jaden McDaniels for a good look. He has become a more willing passer over the years, but he's very much a reactionary passer. He's not going to anticipate things and pass people open. He's going to see openings and throw the ball reacting to the defense reacting to him. And that's fine because I think I think he has the potential to be a true like a
APEX scorer in this league. And I also think he has the chance to be an all defense level two way player that is enough to make him a top tier superstar one day. He just needs to become more surgically reliable as a scorer the way a guy like Shay Gilsis Alexander is, and he'll need to reach that all defense level, which we'll get more into in a little bit. His one on one stuff wasn't great last year, and this is where I think the three point shooting
really came back to bite him. He ran six hundred and thirty six ISOs and post ups last year, including passes, and got just zero point nine to one points per possession, not good. I just think this comes down to a combination of two things. One the go Beart problem. Just in general, in ISO situations, you're not getting the benefit of Gobert as a screener. You're getting Gobert in the dunker spot. And it's not a particularly good lob passer.
Gobert's particularly good lob finisher. It just creates some spacing issues there. The second piece of it is just an't bailed on the mid range shot. An shot fine on pull up threes in ISO shot thirty eight percent. Not as well as he did in other areas as a three point shooter, but that's enough to like. Thirty eight percent from three is like I was. I had a comment on the Lebron video where someone was like, why did he say thirty six percent is good on pull
up threes in ball screens? Thirty six percent on threes in ball screens is fine. That's well over a point per possession. Thirty six percent on pull up twos is bad. You would be correct about that, But when it comes to pull up twos, you want to be in the high forties at a minimum. But when it comes to pull up threes, as long as you're over thirty five percent. You're getting enough points per shot out of it that it's a good shot. An shot thirty eight percent on
pull up threes out of ISO, that's fine. The problem is he shot just forty one percent on twos out of ISO and just thirty one percent out of the post. Now again, like we talked about the spacing piece, but the second piece of it is and just bailed on the mid range shot. This year, we are extremely excited
to announce our new presenting sponsor, hard Rock Bet. Everyone knows and loves the hard rock hotels and casinos, and now you can use the top rated hard Rock Bet sports book to place all of your bets all NFL season and beyond. Hard Rock Bet is the only legal sportsbook in the state of Florida and is also available in Arizona, Ohio, New Jersey, Indiana, Tennessee, Virginia, Illinois, and Colorado,
with more states launching all the time. You can also play on hard Rock Bets online casino if you're in New Jersey. So from here on out, you're gonna see us use betting lines from hard Rock Bet, especially as we get into the NBA season. It'll be a big part of our coverage from there and as we gear up for the NFL season. Sign up for hard Rock Bet and make a five dollars bet and you'll get one hundred and fifty dollars in bonus bets if you win.
Head over to hard Rock Bet and sign up and make your first deposit today, payable in bonus bets, not a cash offer offered by the Seminal Tribe of Florida. In Florida, offered by Seminal hard Rock Digital LLC. In all other states. Must be twenty one plus and physically present Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, or Virginia to play. Terms and conditions apply. Concerned about gambling in Florida, call one eight eight eight admit it.
In Indiana. If you are someone you know has a gambling problem and wants help, call one eight hundred and nine with it gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, and Virginia. In twenty twenty four, so the year before last, and had built out a pretty robust set of like short fades over both shoulders little step back moves and you just generally leaned on his short range scoring way more.
He ran five one hundred and seventy one to one on ones that year and got one point zero three points per possession, which is really solid one on one work on substantially higher mid range volume, substantially higher post up volume. That's a part of his game that he just let go. And what that's what really concerns me about what happened last year. It shows a lack of emphasis on that part of his game. I want Aunt to emphasize that as part of his development moving forward,
so that he's just more rounded. In twenty twenty four, Aunt attempted to shoot out of the post sixty eight times last year. That dropped it just thirty five times. He posted up seven times total in this year's playoff run. He did so twenty seven times two years ago, and guess what, he got one point nine points per possession out of the post. So he posted up to devastating effect in the twenty twenty four playoff run like twice a game and literally went down to doing it like
once every other game. That's abandoning a super efficient play type that is just about proven to be more impactful in the postseason because of the physicality than high volume three point shooting is. Looking at short range jump shooting. In twenty twenty four, attempted two hundred and ten jump shots inside his seventeen feet. In twenty twenty five, that dropped to one hundred and thirty six, almost half, and
it especially showed in the playoffs. He took forty of those short twos in the twenty twenty four Western Conference Finals run. He made twenty one of them. That's fifty three percent. That's one point zero five points per shot. He was getting great success out of mid range jump shooting and post ups in that playoff runt, physical aggression, using his athleticism to get more consistent shot making closer to the rings him. He went from forty down to
just sixteen of those in this most recent playoff run. So, in other words, despite making real progress as a short range scorer and getting real reliable results in that twenty twenty four playoff run, and bailed on it in the name of large sample efficiency in the form of high volume three point shooting. I thought this difference in philosophies was especially glaring in the Western Conference final series against
Oklahoma City this year. To elite defenses going at each other, yeah, did in like Minnesota's game plan picking up shape, you know at half court. That was something that I think it's more harm than good. But to elite defense is going at each other two very different types of scorers. Shay was able to get these consistent bits of short range shot making that carried him in that series, and
he bolstered it with thebility to get to the foul line. Ant, on the other hand, at several ice cold nights from three, and he's not as good at getting to the line. As a result, Sga was able to score more effectively and I was digging into the numbers. The difference was almost entirely short range scoring and free throws. So Shae badly outscored Ant in that series. He had one hundred and fifty seven points to Ant having just one hundred and fifteen. It's a forty two point gap over the
course of the series. Excuse me, a yeah, forty two point gap. That's massive, and it was almost entirely made up of short range scoring and free throws. Shay made twenty nine twos outside of the restricted area. It made forty four free throws. That's one hundred and two points right there. Ant made fourteen twos outside of the restricted area, so less than half as many, and just twenty two free throws half as many. That's fifty points. That oneh
two to fifty gap. That was literally the difference between the two of them as scorers in that series. Ants game built on three point shooting failed him. SGA's game built on short range scoring and the ability to get to the line that did not fail him. That's the change in approach that we need to see from Aunt in order for him to jump from that second tier of stars into that first tier of stars. Again, like we talked about earlier, Step one, self awareness, acknowledge the
type of player that you are. Aunt is never going to be the type of dude who averages tennis sists per game. A good portion of that playmaking talent is what you're born with. I think that Aunt certainly could be a guy who you know, in his early thirties is around seven eight assists per game just because he becomes super experienced at making the reads all the time. But I don't see him getting into that APEX play tier.
So APEX as a player is basically best scorer in the league, dominant perimeter defender, the Michael Jordan archetype that is his path. So step two is identifying this flaw in his approach, and I do believe that Aunt will. I think we're going to see a massive increase in Ant in short range scoring this year as soon as this season, at the expense of large sample efficiency. Like I am fine with Ant dropping a little bit in his true shooting percentage this year, his post up volume
needs a skyrocket. I think he needs to lead the league and guard post ups this year. He's built like an am tank and it's going to be something he can lean on in the postseason. Two, he needs to emphasize short range shot making in his ISOs. Work guys down closer ten feet from the basket, build out those short step backs both directions, turn around over your right shoulder, turn around over your left shoulder, maybe a left shoulder hook.
The advanced footwork like step throughs, things like that short range scoring, and then lastly the foul drifting. I may hate that shit, Aunt strikes me as the type of dude who probably hates that shit too, But if you could figure out a way to get to the line, maybe one more time per half, like maybe just adding pump fakes out of the post or taking some more aggressive driving angles to get into defender's chests forcing the
reft to blow the whistle. But if you could find a way to get a couple extra free throw attempts per game, I think that would go a long way as well. This is where Aunt actually has the capability of one day surpassing a guy like Shake Gildas Alexander. Those are you guys who've been following the show for a while, might remember I got into a debate with the nerd Sess guys years ago, it's like two or three years ago about who had a higher potential ceiling
between Aunt and SGA. And the truth is Aunt does have more potential. He has to earn it to actually get there. But his size, strength, and athleticism is an absurd tool. He's built like an absolute truck, and he has the potential to build out a bully ball game that SGA could never build out. He has a quicker first step, He's far more explosive at the rim. Vertically, Ant has the potential to be a much better defender, But right now, SGA is better than him at all
those things. Sga is a far more polished post player right now. He's better at using change of pace and counter moves to get all the way to the rim, so he gets to the rim more often and finishes at a higher percentage when he gets there. He's a better brim finisher, he's better at drawing fouls when he gets there. And even though Ant has all this defensive potential, Shay is a better defender than him right now. He's
more attentive off the ball. Ant would certainly be better than SGA one on one playing on an island, but who's stupid enough to attack Ant one on one? You run him through screens where he can struggle to navigate screens, and you take advantage of his lack of attention off
the ball. I think Ant has all world defensive potential, but right now, Shay is the more useful off ball defender because he's got good length and he's always in the right spot he plays it, pays attention to the defensive scheme and where he's supposed to be, and that makes him a more useful defender, a more complete defender right now. Now. None of that is a death sentence
for this rivalry. Shay is a solid three years older than Ant, and if you actually compare the season Ant just had to a season from SGA three years ago, Aunt is actually considerably better than SGA was at that point in time. So Ant is technically ahead of schedule, but he's got a long way to go. SGA made massive leaps in those three years. He's an It's got his work cut out for him. I get super excited
about Ant because I think his potential is preposterous. We talked a second ago about how Ant's defensive talent hasn't really had high level impact yet, but he has the potential to be like a game breaking defender. He could easily become one of the two or three best perimeter defenders in the entire NBA if he just got better at navigating screens and he's got the quickness to do
it and the strength to do it. He has the strength to switch onto bigger forwards and switches, and he is ridiculous weak side potential jumping passing lanes and protecting the rim if he can just become more attentive and smarter in the game plan. So I absolutely think it could be an all defense level player. That's not really in the cards for a guy like SGA, in my opinion, and he's quite literally just barely scratching the surface of
his offensive potential. This feels crazy to say, considering he just averaged twenty eight points per game on sixty percent
for shooting for a full season. When he starts to master like timing on his drives and change of pace and just getting a little bit more methodical with the way he attacks the basket, when he becomes a master short range score, which I think is in his future, when he goes up just that little bit of an extra level as a playmaker just from making the same reads thousands of times, when he starts to figure out how to get defenders out of position to draw that
extra couple of fouls per game. He's got a long way to go, But I think Aunt legitimately has best player in the world potential. I'm not sure SGA has that he has the physical talent to be an indomitable, too way force in the playmaking talent, Like, when you're looking at these guys in this tier, you have got to be really, really great at multiple things to be
the best player in the world. Shay is transcendently great as a score which is enough to move him into this top tier, but he doesn't have the defensive talent to be like extremely good on the defensive end, and he doesn't have the playmaking talent to be extremely good as a playmaker. I think you need to check two of those boxes to enter into that conversation with like Jokish, who is a transcendently great scorer and a transcendently great
playmaker and has the ability to check multiple boxes. One day, I think he could be a transcendently good scorer and a transcendently good defender. That is the pathway to him becoming the best player in the world. I want to be very clear, I'm just talking about potential. There is a I would argue it's more likely than not that Ant kind of ends up as just another guy in the top tier for the majority of his career, But
that potential is there. It's going to take obsessive competitiveness, obsessive work behind the scenes, dedication, and willingness to do the dirty work. But I do think Ant has all world potential, the ability to be remembered as one of the guys who took the title of the best player in the world at some point in time, and has the potential in the meantime. I think number five is a bet, a safe bet for Ant In this coming season.
He's gonna play at least seventy five games. He's going to average at least twenty eight points per game on at least fifty eight percent through shooting, assuming he cuts down on his three point volume a little bit, I expect him to invest more in short range scoring. I think he did learn his lesson after last year, and I don't think it would be a bad trade off if he lost a little bit of that regular season efficiency, but he became a more reliable playoff score And again,
like everything, I'm grading him on a curve here. When I talk about best player in the world, I mean he's played forty two playoff games, made two Western Conference Finals run, and he is a career twenty seven points per game on fifty nine percenter shooting in the playoffs.
That's the guy that we've all nitpicked into oblivion. Ant is in the unfortunate position of being a player in his early twenties who is consistently making deep playoff runs and consistently facing off with experienced superstars, and those dudes outplay him. This is causing everyone to hyper focus on his flaws, but when the reality is he's crushing it for a guy his age. In the meantime, I have a ranked at number five, but I am really curious to see if he can actually capitalize on that all
world potential. All right, now that we're done with our second tier of superstars, I wanted to take some time to look back at this grouping talk about what their absolute peaks were, or for the younger guys, what their actual peaks could be. I'm gonna start at number fourteen and work our way up the list. So number fourteen Joel Embiid. I actually had a hard time with this one.
I settled on the twenty twenty one season. I understand that he won the MVP in twenty twenty three and put up all those crazy scoring numbers, but that was a phase of his career where he was super banged up and he really struggled to get through seasons healthy and he just wasn't very good when he would get
to the playoffs every year all banged up. In twenty twenty one, that was really the only year where he played multiple playoff rounds and didn't experience any sort of substantial drop off in his scoring or efficiency in the postseason compared to the regular season. In the twenty twenty one regular season and Beat averaged twenty nine points and eleven rebounds eleven rebounds on sixty four percent through shooting. In the playoffs, he averaged twenty eight points eleven rebounds
on sixty three percent through shooting. He had some turnover issues, especially at the end of the Hawk series, but if you guys remember that was the series where Ben's Simmons like just completely shit the bed and they probably advanced to the conference finals and have a great shot to win the title if they get a better performance out
of Ben Simmons in that series. I think at that point in time, even including the playoffs, you would have to consider Embiid in that top five, like he was a consensus top five player at that point in time.
He had some best player in the World buzz in later years, like when he was competing for MVPs, but mostly from a regular season box score standpoint, and a lot of like Philadelphia seventy six ers fans, a lot of basketball people understood at that point that Embid was too physically beat up and too inconsistent as a playoff performer to actually be considered as one of the top guys back in twenty twenty one. I think that was the year where you look at him as a consensus
top five guy. Unfortunately, I think that will end up being Embiid's peak. I don't think he'll ever be able to get back to that level again with his knee troubles. Number thirteen Kawhi Leonard, I think the answer to this one is pretty clearly twenty nineteen. I think he hit higher levels as a basketball player later on, but he was unable to sustain them because of his knee troubles.
Like if you wanted to pick like a very small window for a peak, I would look at his two playoff runs in twenty twenty one and twenty twenty three before he got hurt both years. In those thirteen playoff games, he was like Robot Kawhi at his finest thirty one points, eight rebounds, and five assists per game on fifty seven percent from the field, forty two percent from three to eighty eight percent from line, with two point one steals
per game. That's probably the highest individual peak he reached, but thirteen games isn't enough to qualify for something like this. I think twenty nineteen was like that mind body skill peak for Kawhi Leonard. He wasn't quite as good as he was in later years, but he was actually healthy enough to sustain it. He aver hised twenty seven points and seven rebounds on sixty one percent true shooting in
sixty regular season games. He played in all their playoff games that year, he averaged thirty one points and nine rebounds on sixty two percent tro shooting. In the playoffs, he hit all sorts of iconic shots on his way to a finals MVP for an awesome Raptors team and hoisted the trophy. I think at this point in time, he was the clear fourth best player in the world,
behind Lebron Stephan kd. Now, if you want to argue Kawhi second because KDE and Lebron were both hurt that year, sure go ahead, But I mean Lebron literally went right back the next year, whipped Kawai's ass and was clearly the best player alive and won the title. So I don't I think that was more injury related, And then I would argue that Kawhi's ceiling has been higher than Kd's ceiling post Kd's Achilles tear. But I thought healthy KD in twenty nineteen was still a better player than
Kawhi Leonard at that point in time. So I think like Kawhi peaked as like the fourth best everyone's healthy player in the world during that particular season. Number twelve Donovan Mitchell. I think we're actually at Donovan Mitchell's peak right now. More or less, that's the peak of his
mind body skill connection. Like we talked about earlier, he might not be putting up the same numbers he did in twenty twenty three, but I think he's a much better game manager now, and he's a better defender now than he was there towards the end with the Jazz, and he just put together a monster playoff run this last season. I do think this is the highest Donovan Mitchell will ever get. I'm not gonna say that he can't move up. I just don't necessarily think he will.
He relies very heavily on his athletic advantages at this point in his career, but he's about to turn twenty nine years old. I think he may plateau here for a couple of years, but I would be surprised if he ever moved up substantially, like I'd be surprised if we were ever talking about Donovan Mitchell as the fifth best player in the world. I think this is more or less the peak for him. But I don't don't get hung up on the number twelve thing. Like the
league is super deep with talent. The bottom line is this year I considered him to be on the same level as the second tier superstars in this league, which I think is an amazing accomplishment, especially for a guy who was a thirteenth pick, number eleven. Kevin Durants, I think his peak was twenty eighteen. The numbers weren't super impressive because of the fact that he was playing on the most talented roster ever assembled, but they were impressive nonetheless.
Twenty six points, seven rebounds on five assists on sixty four percent shooting, a career high one point eight blocks per game that year in the playoff run, twenty nine eight and five on sixty one percent tr shooting, culminating in what I thought was the best game he ever played in one of the best individual games I've ever seen any NBA player in the history of the league. Game three of the NBA Finals against the Cleveland Cavaliers.
That was a game if you guys remember Stephan Clay both went completely ice cold and basically no showed the game, and Katie went for forty three points, thirteen rebounds, and seven assists on fifteen for twenty three from the field in six for nine from three, and the box score doesn't really tell the full story. I thought he was masterful from start to finish. I thought he completely controlled the flow of the game. He hit the dagger over Lebron to end that game with from like twenty seven
feet away from the basket. That was Kd's peak in my opinion. Now, the question is where did KD rank at this point in time. You know what's funny is, at the time, a younger version of me, almost a decade ago, I thought KD was better than Steph at that point in time. But it was a long time ago. I was a much younger basketball fan. I didn't really understand basketball the way that I do now. I didn't
understand advantage creation the way I do now. So I now feel pretty strongly that Steph was the best player on that team. So at that point in time, I would have put KD third behind Lebron at one in Steph at two. I just think Steph's advantage creation was the actual thing that made that team go. Steph was a little bit susceptible to variants, and yeah, like KD was saved their ass, but that's what made it a sweep.
Like Steph was going toe to tote with Lebron without Kevin Durant in the couple of years before that partnership. I think Steph was a better player than KD at that point in time. But that to me, like it's interesting because I do think KD reached a higher point in the league's hierarchy earlier on, Like from twenty twelve to twenty fourteen, he was the second best player in the world behind Lebron. I just think KD is a basketball player, was better in twenty eighteen. Steph just had
surpassed him at that point. There's no shame in that. I think Steph is the fifth best perimeter player of all time. That's just what happens when Steph Curry comes into the equation number ten. Anthony Davis, this one's easy twenty twenty twenty six points and nine rebounds with four stocks per game on sixty one percent through shooting. That season an absolutely ridiculous playoff run twenty eight points and ten rebounds per game on sixty seven percent through shooting.
Became an absolutely deadly jump shooter. In that playoff run, he shot forty seven percent on all jump shots. He shot sixty two percent on long twos outside of seventeen feet. He was thirty one for fifty, He had a game winner. He was a dominant defender the whole year, from start to finish. It really answered the question of like, what would it look like if you had the best defender in the league but also a guy with a deadly jump shot, And that guy, in my opinion at that
point in time, was the fourth best player in the world. Now, unfortunately, as with Embiid, I just think Ad is too far gone in terms of his injuries and the weight that he's put on and the age that he's at now. I don't think he'll ever pass that ceiling again. But twenty twenty was the peak of Anthony Davis' career. Number nine. Jalen Brunson, similarly to Donovan Mitchell. I think we're experiencing
his peak right now. By the time you guys see this video, he'll be twenty nine years old, so he'll begin to experience some age related declin and athleticism. But I do think he'll hang at this level for like similar to Mitchell, I think he'll plateau here for a while before he go before he goes down. But we're in a three year span. We're in the playoffs for three consecutive seasons. He's averaged thirty points per game on
fifty seven percent through shooting with seven assists. That's one hell of a run from a guy who's now entered into that second tier of superstars. Again, we were talking about this with like Shae at the top. Like, the problem with guys like Mitchell and Brunson is they're not transcendently great at scoring the way that Shay is, and they don't have that I'm awesome at several different things.
Tier like Brunson's a better passer than Donovan Mitchell, but Jalen Brunson still is not an elite passer, and he still is not a guy who can impact the game defensively. And so they're both really good scorers, but they just don't have the versatility elements of their game to crack into that top tier. And if you're gonna crack into that top tier without versatility, you gotta be like Shae, a guy who's gonna average damn near thirty four points
per game hyper efficiently. And that's just not what you're getting out of those two guys. So I look at Brunson and Mitchell is more or less at their ceilings right now. Number eight Lebron James peak for me with Lebron was twenty eighteen. It was unfortunately one of the worst rosters he ever played on, but he still managed to drag them to the finals. He averaged twenty eight points nine rebounds in nine asists on sixty two percent
true shooting that year. Went up a massive level in the playoffs, one of the best individual playoff runs you will ever see in the history of the NBA. He averaged thirty four points, nine rebounds in nine a sists without a dip inefficiency stated sixty two percent true shooting. He coasted on defense in the regular season, but he was great on that end in the playoffs. He had eight forty point games in that postseason run. He hung fifty on the Warriors in the finals. He hit multiple
buzzer beating game winners. He won multiple series as the underdog. To put it very simply, not only was Lebron the best player in the league in twenty eighteen, I think twenty eighteen Lebron is the best basketball player to ever play in the NBA. Number seven Victor Wimenyama, obviously not too much to dig into. Last season was his peak? The hard to see why it was his second season, obviously predictable leaps across the board. The question is what
will Wemby's peak be? And the answer is, I think he will be the best player in the world someday. I talked about Aunt today and how he had the potential to one day become the best player in the world, But it's far from a guarantee with Ant, I actually think it's a safer bet with Ant that he cracks the top tier of superstars but never actually claims the top spot. I personally would be surprised if Wemby never actually took the top spot in the NBA. He's already
the best defensive player in the world. He's very likely to get even better on that end in the coming years, as he gets better at reading and reacting to modern NBA offenses, Like I think he'll become he's already the best defender in the NBA. I think he'll become far, far, far, far, far and away the best defender in the NBA in time.
But I also think it's almost a certainty that he'll eventually average thirty points per game on sixty two percent true shooting or so, probably in the next like two or three years. So like I think he would require an injury or for Wemby to like just straight up not figure a lot of basic shit out for him to not eventually become the consensus top player in the world.
Two more, number six Steph Curry. I think his peak stretched from the end of the regular season in twenty twenty one to the time he hoisted the trophy in the twenty twenty two finals. I think that twenty twenty two season was the one time in Steph's career where I think he had a really strong, really hard to refute case as the best basketball player alive. Like I disagree with Warriors fans, I think he was better than
Lebron during Lebron's prime. I you know, it gets to be a debate with him in Giannis in twenty twenty one, I had Giannis as the best player in the world. In twenty twenty one he won the title. Kind of feels like you have to give it to him there. Jokic, I think snatched it for good starting in twenty twenty three. Twenty twenty two, is that one season in Steph's career where I really do think he had a strong case
to be the best player in the world. At that point, Giannis regressed a little bit off of his title winning season in twenty twenty one. Jokic hadn't really peaked yet, maybe because of his rosters, but still we'll just you know, he hadn't made that successful deep playoff run where he just alpha dogged everybody like he did the following season. Lebron was never the same after his high ankle sprain in twenty twenty one. Luca and Shakilvis Alexander weren't ready yet.
I think that was the window in time where Steph had that best player in the world belt twenty twenty one, the second half of the season that was insane. Steph's last forty three games that year, despite the entire league throwing everything at him. Because KD was out, Klay Thompson was out, he was getting the most aggressive coverages in the world. He averaged thirty four points per game on
sixty seven percent true shooting for forty three games. That is far and away the most impressive scoring in afficiency stretch of his career. He did battle a slight shooting slump in the following season, but on a better roster, he recaptured his touch in the playoffs, made the run at the end, iconic game in Game four on the road in Boston, gets that title that legitimizes everything and shuts the haters up from the previous titles. Lastly, number
five Anthony Edwards. I'm going to go with the twenty twenty four season, so two years ago. Obviously, he had a much more impressive regular season this year with his high volume three point shooting. But I thought that he was more surgical and more physically aggressive as a scorer in twenty twenty four, and I think that made him a better player in the playoffs compared to the compared
to the following year. Now, as I said earlier, I do think at has the potential to be the best player in the world someday, but I think it will require a lot of things to go right for him. I think he needs to maximize his defensive potential and become a much more reliable possession of possession score and he just has a long way to go to get there.
But I do think he has that potential. All right, guys, It's all I have for today is always to sincerely appreciate you guys for supporting me and supporting the show. We will be back on Friday with a mailbag. I will see you guys back
