The volume, Throw another shrimp on the barbie. Get in on all the UFC three oh five action live from the Land down Under at DraftKings Sportsbook, the official sports betting partner of the UFC. The Middleweights title is on the line for the main event, but the card is stacked full of Ripsnorter Blokes and Sheila's And speaking of stack, if you're new to DraftKings, listen up. New customers, bet five dollars to get one hundred and fifty dollars in
bonus bets. Instantly download the DraftKings Sportsbook app now and use code hoops that's h oops, that's code hoops for new customers to get one fifty in bonus bets. When you bet just five bucks UFC three oh five, it's going to be a ripper of a good time. Only on DraftKings. The Crown is yours. Gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler In New York call eight seven seven eight Hope and Why, or text hope and Why to four six seven, three six nine. In Connecticut, help is
available for problem gambling. Call eight eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or visit CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of Boothill Casino and Resort in Kansas. Twenty one plus age varies by jurisdiction, void in Ontario. Bonus bets expire one hundred and sixty eight hours after issuance. Deposit and eligibility restrictions apply. See eligibility terms and responsible gaming resources at DKG dot co slash m m M. All right, welcome to tonight here at
the Volume of Hope. All you guys are having a great week. We are starting our annual player rankings today. We're gonna take some time off the start of the show to kind of go over the rules for this particular list, the differences between this list and the list we had last year, as well as the years that preceded that, and then we're gonna get into the players starting with number twenty five and number twenty four today. You guys know the joke before we get started. Subscribe
to the Hoops Tonight YouTube channels. You don't miss any more of our videos. Follow me on Twitter and underscore jcnlts. You guys, don't miss you announcements. Don't forget about a podcast feed wherever you get your podcasts under Hoops Tonight don't forget. It's also helpful if you leave a rating and a review on that front in the last but out least, keep dropping mailbag questions in those YouTube comments.
We can keep hitting them throughout the remainder of this list. Specifically, if you guys disagree with anything on this list, drop your case for it in the comments, and we'll take time, especially when I get back from vacation, to actually go over some of your guys's responses and we'll kind of argue back and forth about some of the specific placements of some of these guys on this list. So major
differences between this list and last year. So last year I did a bragging rights list, and I laid out explicitly at the beginning my particular rules, but it led to a lot of confusion, and I think it was a flawed process. And one of the main reasons why is I really like that format for the top of the list. And again for those of you guys who missed it from last year, the bragging rights type of format is like what did you accomplish last year?
Right?
Whereas an in a vacuum kind of list is more of like if I was drafting a team irrespective of any circumstances that actually exist in the NBA today. If I was drafting in a vacuum players to build a team for this upcoming season, that's a totally different perspective than who had the most successful previous season, right. And So while I like that format for the top because I like having like a real bragging rights type of champ,
it really leads to some problems down the line. And while I really believe that winning has to mean something and that's why we need a bragging rights list, I don't think it makes sense after we get past the top. So, like, great example last year is like Luca, right, So, like I've consistently in a vacuum had Luca as a top five player, but he had a really rough year last year. Not only did his team miss the playoffs, but it
was a tough end of the year for him. He wasn't playing good basketball, especially on the defensive end of the floor, right. And So that's one of those things where that's not an appropriate way to really categorize the fact that, like, sometimes you can just have a bad year and everything can go wrong. And while it might mean that you don't have the bragging rights. It's just tough to kind of quantify all of that in a list.
So the way we're going to address that is we are going to have an in a vacuum list, and then at the very end, I'm gonna pick the three or four guys that are candidates for the best possible season from last year, our bragging rights guys. It will rank those guys at the very end. It will just do the top It'll be like three, four or five players. You know, It'll be like, you know, is it Jason Tatum, the guy who was the best player on the Celtics most of the year and won the title. Was it
Luka Doncic who took his team to the finals? Was it Nikola Jokic who won MVP? Like, We'll take a list of those guys, the very short list at the top, and we'll rank them for a bragging rights at the very end. But for an actual top twenty five players list this year, we're going to do it purely in a vacuum. So the question is what does in a vacuum mean for this particular list I want to go through. I've got let's see, I've got four specific rules that
we're going to follow for this list. Rule number one, it is completely irrespective of any team circumstances from last year. So if your case for a player is but so and so won a lot of games, that's a team accomplishment. We're going to specifically be looking at how does this player contribute personally to the success of his team within the context of like if I was building a roster from scratch, right, So, again, don't think of this purely as a reward for success from last season. That's what
we're going to use our bragging rights list for. Secondly, how would you build a team? How easy would it be to build a championship contender around this player from scratch? So, like, what responsibilities does he fulfill? Can he create shots in the half court at high volume? Can he anchor a high level defense? Can he guard opposing superstars? Can he play off the ball and on the ball? Can he play in different styles? Can he score in versatile ways
as circumstances shift around him in the playoffs? Right, We're gonna be looking at a lot of different details into how a player would impact winning if I was trying to build around them, right, So, for instance, a lot of you guys know that I highly value half court offensive initiation, and I'll just give you guys, like a basic kind of example. I tweeted out a poll today between Jalen Brown and Devin Booker, and there are two
players that I have very close in my list. But for me, as you guys know Devin Booker's ability to put the ball in his hands and run twenty five pick and rolls a game if I had to, and to like really lean on him to create offense, it's easier for me to build athleticism and dirty work around that to construct a useful basketball team than it is for me to take Jaylen Brown as the best player on a team that I'm running everything through offensively and
then try to supplement hint specifically, because Jalen Brown doesn't see the floor as well as Devin Booker does, he doesn't shoot the ball as well as Devin Booker does, he can't like really spam those kinds of actions. So that's my basketball worldview. If you guys have a different basketball worldview and you don't value that like surgical in the half court offensive initiation as much as I do,
you're probably gonna have some different rankings than me. But I have to let you guys know that up front because that's a specific kind of framework for how this list works. Like when I'm building a championship contender, my number one priority is who's gonna run my offense. Who's gonna be the primary guy who gets the defense into rotation.
Once the defense is in rotation, now it's everyone's playing with an advantage, and I can make lesser players fulfill achievable roles, but I gotta get the defense into rotation consistently, and so that half court offensive initiation piece is really valuable for me. The third piece that we're gonna be looking at is durability. This is in a vacuum, not for a playoff series that starts tomorrow, but for a
eighty two game season starting with the training camp. So a month of ramping up into eighty two games over damn near what is it October, November, December, January, February, March, April, damn near seven months of basketball, basically six months of basketball in the regular season, and then from there into
four two week rounds of post He's in basketball. Who is best equipped to be reliably available for that long of a stretch of basketball right, So that's a third piece of it, and then the fourth piece we're looking at is the ceiling. The ceiling still matters. I'll give you an example. Kawhi Leonard. Kawhi Leonard has a major issue with reliability. The dude hasn't been able to finish
a playoff run in four consecutive seasons. However, what if the Clippers do get to the playoffs and they're healthy. What if Kawhi is on the floor tomorrow for the game all of a sudden, it doesn't matter how you feel about the eighty two if he's better than your
player right now for a series that starts today. What that means is, while obviously durability is going to be a hit for a guy like Kawhi, when the chips are down and it's time to throw down and we're trying to win game in an actual playoff setting, how high of a level can your player reach. So, Kawhi Leonard, even though he has some huge demerits in the sense of his reliability, you always have to account for the well, what if this is the year that Kawhi Leonard is healthy.
Another example is Lebron James. Lebron James gets a lot of flak at this point in his career for he's in his way through the regular season and missing time, although he was available for the most part last season. But guess what, last year he was healthy for the playoffs and he played at a top five level in the playoffs. So like again, as we factor in Lebron obviously for the eighty two, there's a certain limitation there, but his ceiling is still such that if he is available,
we have to factor that in. So those are the four main character categories there. I do not care how good your team was last year. I'm looking specifically at how you can contribute to winning in a vacuum on a fresh basketball team built from scratch. Two, How easy is it to build around you, What responsibilities specifically do you fill? Three? How available are you? And four when you really need to hit the gas, how high of a level can you hit? How high is your ceiling?
That's how we're gonna rank these top twenty five. And then again at the very end, we're gonna do a separate video that's gonna have nothing to do with this list, where we're gonna zero in on a handful of guys who are all candidates for the best possible season this last year, and then we'll talk about who gets to be the guy that walks around the league next year saying like, I'm the dude who was the best last year based on what I actually did, based on what
we actually accomplished. Team success will be a major factor in that one. So those are kind of the initial pieces of framework that make this list work. I do have two other notes. One, the talent pool is insane. Go ahead, just right now, if you have some time, try to just make a list. Doesn't have to be perfect, you're not sharing it, but just it down for a minute and list out the top twenty five players. You'll
find out quickly that it's very, very difficult. Why because there are a lot of players that if I threw a name out, you would think that guy's a top
twenty five player. In fact, I started at when I began this process, my preliminary list of candidates, the guys were like I basically just treated it as like if I looked at this guy and someone said, hey, I have this guy in my top twenty five, it's like it's like passable, meaning like there is a defensible case for this player to be one of the top twenty
five players in the NBA. My preliminary list was forty five players long, so there were twenty guys that reasonably could be considered top twenty five guys who didn't make my list. I'll give you guys one example, Paul George. Paul George is a guy that was clearly in the top twenty for me last year and a guy that I think the majority of people would think like if I said, oh, Paul George's top twenty five player, you'd
be like, yeah, sounds right, right. It's Paul George. He's a top twenty five player, but I had him just outside of my top twenty five because the league is just incredibly stacked with talent. That said, there's not a large gap, Like Paul George is not substantially worse than the guy that I have ranked at twenty five. It's a small gap because of how talented all these guys
in that list of forty five are. And by the way, I'm gonna read the full list of forty five here shortly so that you guys can see my preliminary list. Point is, there will be a lot of guys that could be top twenty five players that won't make this list, so just be prepared for that. And the same goes for the top of this list. I have a guy outside of my top ten that I never in a million years would have thought that I'd be ranking him
outside of the top ten in this list. But I think there are eleven players that are kind of in that tier and somebody has to be cut, and I literally can't make the case for him over anybody above him. That's not a product of that player not playing at a top ten level. That's just the reality of how much talent there is at the top of the league. And that's my last note. We are splitting hairs here, guys. I have four tiers for the list. I have top
tier Superstars. These are the perennial MVP candidates like I expect for multiple years to come. They will be in the MVP voting ray, so like in that top five type of race for MVP. Then I have my second tier Superstars. These are the guys that are not in the MVP race, but on any given night can play like one of those guys at the top of the league. They're just not as consistent and reliable every night, but on any given night they can outplay or be better or as good as the dudes at the top of
the league. Then I have my third tier stars. These are the last group of guys that can still be the best player on a championship team, but they need a ton of talent support to get there. And then I have my fourth tier stars. These are the guys that are not quite good enough to be the best player on a championship team, but can be the second best player on a championship team. Within those tiers, the
players are all bunched up on each other. So, for instance, like the guy I have ranked sixth on my list is very close to the guy I have ranked eleventh on my list, the guy I have ranked eighteenth on my list is very close to the guy I of at twenty five. Because within those tiers, they're very close the actual tiers themselves, and I will explain them to you when we hit those brakes. The tiers themselves are meant to actually represent a gap, but within those tiers
they're very close. Point is is this is up for debate. It's very subjective, and like I said in the intro, I want you guys to make the case for why you think I'm wrong in the comments. I'm recording these, these first few videos, I'm recording before I go to town for vacation, so I won't be able to react to your mail bag questions because these are going to be
released long after I record them. But when I get back in town on the eighteenth, we're only going to be a small portion of the way through this list. And one of my plans is after I hit whatever the next few players are, I'm gonna go to basically a mini mail bag at the end, or I bounce
off of you guys in your disagreements. So if I say something in these player rankings videos that you guys disagree with, break it down, break down the basketball in the comments, I promise you if you say, screw you, Jason, you're wrong, You're an idiot, I'm not gonna respond. There's just nothing. There's no conversation to be had there. But if you say, hey, Jason, for instance number twenty five, for me, I if you disagree with that guy or you'd rank him outside, you say, hey, how do you
have that guy above? Paul George? Break it down for me, Explain the basketball, and we'll talk about it, and we'll talk about it in our mailbag sessions when I get back from vacation. All right, this was my preliminary list. These were the forty five guys that I considered for the top twenty five players in the league. List. These are not in order. These are specifically in order of
the NBA standings. What I did as I went team by team, starting with the East one seed down and then the West one seed down, and I just listed the players on those particular rosters that I think could be considered top twenty five players. This was my preliminary list.
Jason Tatum, Jaylen Brown, Jalen Brunson, Giannison, Tennacumpo, Damian Lillard, Donovan Mitchell, Palla, Boncaro, Tyrese Halliburton, Pascal Siakam, Joel Embiid, Tyrese Maxi, Paul George, Jimmy Butler, bam Adebayo, Trey Young, Scottie Barnes, Cad Cunningham, Shay Gilgess, Alexander Jalen, Williams, chet Holmgren, NIKOLEA Jokic, Jamal Murray, Anthony Edwards, Karl, Anthony Towns, Kawhi, Leonard James Harden, Luka, Doncic, Kyrie Irving, Kevin Durant, Devin Booker,
Lebron James, Anthony Davis, Zion Williamson, Dejonte Murray, Brandon Ingram, Daron Fox, DeMar DeRozan, Demona Sabonis, Stephen Curry, Alpern, Shangoon, Laurie Markinen, John Morant, Desmond Bain, Jaren Jackson Junior, and Victor Wembgyama. That's the forty five players that I came with. Again, Like obviously, there are guys in that list that a lot of them that are that I never actually truly considered to be in top twenty five. However, these are
guys that I just thought had a case. That was my initial list that I worked with, and then I broke it down from there to get to the top twenty five.
Preparing for your upcoming fantasy football draft, do you wish that you could wave a magic wand and somehow know who exactly your league mates are going to take? Well? With Draft Intel from Fantasy Pros, you'll know exactly how your league mats draft better than they do. Draft Intel will automatically analyze your league's history to see who rushes to the draft board first to take a quarterback, who takes too many rookies and who was going to reach
for their favorite teams players over and over again. Everybody hates a homer and every league has one of them. But right now you can put all that intel to the test by bringing those patterns directly into a mock draft and make your mock draft feel like the real thing. Check out fantasypros dot com slash volume today to get an edge over your league mates right now and forever.
So starting with number twenty five, our first player in this year's Least Kyrie Irvin. His twenty twenty four campaign, these were his counting stats. Counting stats, he played fifty eight games to average twenty five point six points per game, five rebounds per game, five point two assists per game, one point eight stocks per game that steals plus blocks.
Kyrie Irvic was one of only seven players in the league last year to average at least twenty five points, five rebounds in five assists on at least sixty percent true shooting, and to play a minimum of fifty games. That's a very basic baseline, twenty five to five and five at least sixty percent true shooting which is high level of efficiency and a minimum of fifty games, meaning
you played the majority of the season. Kyrie did it on sixty point eight percent true shooting basically fifty forty ninety forty nine point seven percent from the field, forty one point one percent from three to ninety point five percent from the line. So he was a twenty five to five to five fifty forty ninety guy. Again, one of only seven players in the league to hit those benchmarks. That's insane guys. In the playoffs twenty two to four
and five Worth mentioning his usage rate drop substantially. He went from about twenty eight percent usage percentage in the regular season to below twenty five percent in the postseason. Had something to do with his scoring taking a little bit of a drop, but he was still largely in that like he still shot just below fifty percent from the field in over four percent from three through the first three rounds. It wasn't until the NBA Finals that
he kind of fell apart. He had a tough NBA Finals and it basically came down to his pull up jumper failing him. So to give you an idea, Kyrie irving in the regular season one point zero four points per pull up jump shot in the first three rounds of the playoffs, one point zero six points per pull up jump shot in the finals just forty two points on fifty one shots, which is zero point eight to
two points per shot. So that was the main thing that really let him down in the finals is he just lost that little extra bit of efficiency when it came to his pull up jump shot. And we're going to talk about it later. That's a huge part of Kyrie's shot. Diet takes almost half his shots or pull up jump shots, and so when that failed him in the Boston Series, it just led to his impact taking a little bit of a dip, but still twenty two,
four and five. Most importantly, I thought he was still pretty good on the margins, Like in terms of his dirty work in the postseason run, I thought he competed hard at the point of attack. He rebounds better than most small guards. Like, Kyrie's never a guy as long as you're good around him, you never really have to worry about him not pulling his weight. Like obviously, if you will have a bunch of bad defensive personnel around him,
it can be an issue. But Kyrie generally holds his own when it comes to the details of the game. Shot creation data. This percent energy in pick and roll one point zero two points per possession including passes for Kyrie that was in the sixty ninth percentile, So he's one of the better pick and roll players in the league. ISO one point zero three points per possession including passes, that was sixty eighth percentile. He also, we're gonna do
high volume lists. Remember this is what we did last year. If you're over one thousand pick and rolls, you're in the high volume list. If you're over two hundred and fifty ISOs, over two hundred and fifty post ups, you're in the high volume list. And I have Kyrie just over the minimum for ISOs. He at one point zero three points posession. It was sixty eighth percentile league wide.
But he was fourteenth out of twenty four players to run at least two hundred and fifty ISOs excellent spot up player converted spot up possions at one point three to one points per possession. That's insanely good. That's in the ninety second percentile around the league. His shooting stats, this is crazy. One point. I'm sorry one point three points per catch and shoot jumper that was ninety second percentile. He was one point three to one points per spot
up possession that was ninety fifth percentile. So I undersold him in the spot up barrier a little bit, but shot the ball extremely well in catching shoot situations. One point zero four points per pull up jump shot that was in the seventy ninth percentile. His face up jab step jump shot one point one point eight points per
shot that was in the eighty fourth percentile. He shot fifty five percent on floaters, he took almost two of them a game, and he shot sixty one percent at the rim, which is insanely good for a small guard. So to put it simply, last year, Kyrie is one of the best shot creators in the game, and as we mentioned, he was one of only seven players to hit at least twenty five points, five rebounds, and five assists on at least sixty percent t shooting and at
least fifty games. The other guys on that list are all big shots Anthony Edwards, Nikola Jokich, Luka, Doncics, Lebron, James sche Giosos Alexander and Gianna Santana Koumpo. That's some quality company for Kyrie Irving in terms of what he did as an offensive initiator this year. He's a better playmaker than he gets credit for him. He had a
two point eight to two assist to turnover ratio. He was one of only twelve players in the league last year to post a usage percentage over twenty five percent and an assistant turnover ratio over two point five over two point five. So like a much better playmaker than you would think for Kyrie Irving, right, And he was one of the most efficient, high volume scorers in the league as well. So this is a guy that you know.
I think he's gone under the radar because of his past, but he's still just like in the short list of the best offensive players in the league and brings a ton of value. As he saw as the second best player on a team that made it within three wins of an NBA championship last year. I was really impressed by his versatility. Like I said, he rebounded out. It was over five rebounds a game last year. In the regular season, he defended better than most small guards at
his position. People will point to his rough NBA Finals as like the reason that Dallas lost, but that's not in my opinion, like Luca is just as destructive to
their defense as Kyrie irving was to their offense. And the real problem in my opinion that broke down that Dallas attack was they didn't have a role player who they could count on to defend but also hit above the break threes, which played perfectly into the schematic approach that Boston had, which was essentially conceding those above the break threes to their role players or couldn't make them.
I thought it was a roster issue. I didn't think Luca and Kyrie were the Could they be better, Yeah, Luca needs to be better defensively, Kyrie needs to be more reliable as a scorer in those settings. But the main reason they lost was that inability to space the floor above the break and how Boston kind of capitalized on that. Kyrie's weaknesses his health, I have three of them down the health piece. He played more than sixty games just once since leaving Cleveland, just fifty eight last year.
You can basically book Kyrie to miss one out of every four games, so that's obviously an issue. He's undersized his impact as a rebounder went down a level in the postseason after the athleticism and effort ramped up. He went from three point six attempts per game in the restricted area in the regular season to just two point eight in the playoffs. That's a sizeable reduction there, it's basically twenty five percent. And then he's still a bit
reliant on pull up shooting. So he attempted eighteen point one shots per game in the postseason, eight point six of them were pull up jump shots, so that's basically half, and that's how it should be given his skill set and how big he is, and he's he's one of those guys. This is not like Anthony Edwards or Jason Tatum last year in the regular season where you're like, dude, why are you taking so many of these? You're not
hitting enough of them. He got well over a point per possession on those pull up jump shots, so he needs to take them. But as we know, and this is just how it leads to where he is in the rankings. Despite being one of the better offensive initiators in the league, he's way down at twenty five, and a big part of that is he's undersized, so he's relying on his pull up jump shot a lot, and when you rely on your pull up jump shot, that
leads to a lot of variants. And he went cold in the finals and that ended up impacting him quite a bit. So. In summary, on Kyrie Irving still on the short list of guys who are good enough to be the second best player on a championship team. He's one of the best offensive initiators in the league. Still, he competes in the dirty work areas of the game,
which makes him easy to build around. He's an excellent off ball score, making him even easier to build around, and by all accounts, he's been an excellent locker room guy in Dallas now that he has his financial future setup, which is why in this current version of our NBA player rankings, I have Kyrie Irving ranked at twenty five, number twenty four dearon Fox. Last year's counting stats played seventy four games. That was the second straight season with
at least seventy games played. He averaged twenty six point six points per game, four point six rebounds per game, five point six assists per game, and two point four stocks that steals plus blocks per game. Last year, he actually led the league in steals last year for the
first time in his career. His shooting splits. He was forty six point five percent from the field thirty six point nine percent from three on eight attempts, so that was by far the best three point shooting season of his career, seventy three point eight percent at the line for a total of fifty seven percent in true shooting percentage. Did miss the playoffs, but there's some important context there.
Malik Monk, Sacramento's second best perimeter shock creator, got hurt at the end of the year, and as a result, Sacramento lost five of their last seven games, and if you look at where they were in the standings, they finished one game behind the Lakers. So had they won one of those last seven and then gone three and four instead of two and five, they would have ended up hosting the Lakers in that second playoff game, a play in game, and they had the Lakers number all season,
especially at home. So, like I like, in all likelihood, if Malik Monk doesn't get hurt, there's a much better chance that the Kings just get in like obviously, like Lebron ad single game setting, maybe they overpower them but I look at it in a more encouraging sense. Dearon Fox has been the best player on his team, the primary offensive initiator on a team that has a terrible defensive front court, which makes it way difficult to win
in the modern NBA. Second best perimeter shot creator is the guy who comes off the bench for them, and they won forty eight and forty six games in the last two seasons in a jam packed Western Conference. So, like I'm more of this is a great example of what we were talking about at the very beginning when I was going through the intro and just some of the rules don't pay attention to the team's success piece when it comes to Dearon Fox. Here he legitimately has
carried the Kings to being a very good team. In a vacuum, he would be a more a higher contributing winner than what he has been in Sacramento on a team that isn't really set up to compete in the NBA. Again, Dearon Fox is an example of a guy last year on my more bragging rights format that he would have suffered and he would have potentially fallen out of the list entirely. But I don't want to do it that way.
I want to make sure that we acknowledge the realities of the surrounding supporting cast within the context of this list. I was generally very like even though we don't didn't get a playoff sample size from Daron Fox this year. I was generally very encouraged by Darren Fox's first playoff series last year against Golden State. I thought he was pretty impactful defensively when he wanted to be. I thought he could really beat people off the dribble and generate
good shots. So I think he's going to be a good playoff player in the long run. So that's not something I'm worried about with him. Shot creation data percent energy Darren Fox one point zero one points per pick and roll including passes. He made our high volume pick and roll list again minimum one thousand possessions. He out of fifteen players that logged at least a thousand pick
and rolls. He ranked eleventh. Inefficiency ISO one point zero four points per possession including passes, that was in the seventieth percentile. He also made a high volume list minimum two to fifty. He ranked thirteenth out of the twenty five players to log at least two hundred fifty ISOs added. In terms of his shooting stats, he added a semi reliable pull up three this season. That was the major development. So like two years ago fifty nine makes on off
the dribble threes just thirty percent. This year one hundred and twenty makes forty six percent, so a substantial leap for Dearn Fox as a pull up three point shooter, pretty good catch and shoot player, not great though, one point zero eight points per shot. Really good when he was wide open, though he shot forty six percent field
goal percentage on unguarded catch and shoot jump shots. His overall pull up shooting forty percent field goal percentage forty nine percent when you weigh it for threes zero point nine to eight points per shot. Still not where he needs to get to, but a really big step in the right direction for Dearon Fox. Forty nine percent on floaters on one hundred and sixty one attempts. He was
a high volume floater guy. Again, took a lot of them out of like euro steps where he'd like drive into the lane and almost like slow himself down on a euro and then get to that little left handed floater shot sixty three percent at the rim, which is solid for an athletic guard like him, like freaky athletes like him, I like prefer above sixty five percent, but that's still pretty good. Nothing to freak out about. His
biggest weaknesses. He's an ineffective off ball player. He converted spot at possessions at a zero point nine to eight points per possession, which is bad. That ranked sixty third out of seventy five players to log at least two hundred and fifty and he scored on a cut to the basket just fifteen times all season, So a lot to improve on in terms of playing off the ball.
That's gonna be something to keep an eye on with Demarta Rosen joining the picture, and just how much more he's going to have to be able to convert those types of opportunities, especially since Demarta Rosen is a very good passer. And then this is really not I don't want to direct this purely at Dearon Fox because it's not just him, but the uh there's an inconsistent defensive effort piece with him, and again this was with everybody.
When the Kings wanted to be they were a very good defensive team because they had all of this speed, especially on the perimeter, but then they would have these like extended weeks long stretches where they just didn't guard. And Fox has the potential to be one of the best perimeter defenders in the league. So like, obviously when it comes to that defensive effort piece, you were hoping
for a little bit more from Darreon Fox. But I mean the way I look at it, like with Dearon, with Demrta Rosen in the picture, he's just going to have more energy for that sort of thing. And I think we're going to get a very good defensive season out of Deer and Fox next year. In summary, deren Fox is the leading offensive initiator for one of the
best offenses in the league. The Kings are nine point four points per one hundred possessions better when Fox is on the floor versus off, according to Cleaning the Glass, and he has a real playoff superpower. He has good size for the guard position, and he's remarkably fast, which can be used for two of the most valuable physical exertions in basketball, which both involved winning at the point of attack on offense, beating people off the dribble on defense,
containing people off the dribble. That's his superpower that I think is a real thing that you can build around. And he's added a decent jump shot to counter that. And if judging by the massive improvement he had year over year, if he continues to improve on that trajectory, he could quickly vault way higher on this list if the jump shot comes around. Now, the Kings have issues that extend far beyond Fox. Like I talked about, they're a horrific defensive front court that makes things hard. They
didn't have another high volume shot. Now they do with Demarto Rosen and again, ninety four wins in that stacked Western Conference over the last two years I think is pretty impressive given the limitations they have. So I've deer and Fox as the twenty fourth best player in the NBA going into next season. All right, guys, that is all I have for a round one of our player rankings.
In our next video, we'll be getting a few more guys, probably three or four guys in the next video that I'll be coming out within the next couple of days. As always, as sincerely appreciate you guys your supporting the show, and I'll see you guys. Then the Volume the NFL seasons right around the corner. We'll be breaking down all the off season storylines on the Colin Cowherd podcast, my
best Takes guests like my buddy Nick Wright. Check out the Colin Coward podcast, part of the Volume network, available on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.