Hoops Tonight - NBA Finals: Luka Doncic COSTING Mavericks? Celtics rank among past 5 NBA champions - podcast episode cover

Hoops Tonight - NBA Finals: Luka Doncic COSTING Mavericks? Celtics rank among past 5 NBA champions

Jun 14, 202433 min
--:--
--:--
Listen in podcast apps:
Metacast
Spotify
Youtube
RSS

Episode description

Jason Timpf answers listener questions during an NBA Finals Mailbag. Jason discusses which team from the West would have given Jayson Tatum, Jaylen Brown, and the Boston Celtics the most difficult time in a playoff series (4:30). Later, he discusses why Luka Doncic's defensive efforts have been detrimental to the Mavericks' chances in the Finals (8:45), whether Jaylen Brown has elevated his game to superstar level (15:30), and ranks the 2024 Celtics amongst the previous five NBA champions (23:30).

(Timestamps may vary based on advertisements.)

#Volume #Herd

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Speaker 1

The volume. All right, welcome to hoho'said out here at the volume heavy Thursday, everybody of ball. If you guys are having a great week, Well, if the Dallas Mavericks had won last night, we'd be pouring over the film today talking about all the different ways that Dallas may or may not be able to tie the series and just what we expect to happen in Game four. But that's not what happened. This series has been pretty consistent

throughout the same themes. On both ends of the floor, Dallas incapable of containing the basketball and staying out of rotation as Boston picks them apart for high quality rim

attempts and shots at the three point line. And then on the other end of the floor, the simple adjustment of putting Jason Tatum on their centers has caused all of the spacing of their ball screen actions to fall apart, and Luca hasn't been able to punish the Bigs enough in switches for it to matter, and so Dallas hasn't been able to score, and that dynamic has not changed at any point throughout the series, and so this thing is over no matter what, even if Dallas goes and

gets Game four off of a hillacious effort and a lackadaisical one on Boston's front. I think Dallas is done with I don't think there's any basketball dynamic they can flip to potentially go on a run and win a bunch of games in a row. So what we're gonna do today is we're gonna do a mail bag and talk about specifically some of the questions you guys have surrounding the NBA Finals. You guys are the job. Before we get started, subscribe to Hoops and I YouTube channel

so you don't miss any more of our videos. Follow me on Twitter at Underscore Jason Lts. You guys don't miss show announcements, Go forget about a podcast feed wherever you get your podcast under Hoops Tonight, and then keep dropping mail back questions in the YouTube comments so we can keep hitting them throughout the rest of the off season and the last min at least before we get started, I want to talk to you guys about game time.

They have an amazing ticket buying experience. I had a great experience with them earlier this year when I went to McHale Center to see the University of Arizona men's basketball team play, got last minute seats, got a great deal, knew exactly what I was getting myself into, had a good picture of what my seats were before I showed

up to the arena. It was a great experience. I highly recommend it to you guys, And as fun as it is watching these games on TV, there's nothing like getting out in person to watch our favorite NBA stars playing in this type of intensity, in these types of environments, with these types of stakes. So get out and check out maybe the last NBA Finals game on Frida, or maybe there's a second one. We'll see if Dallas can

extend the series heading to Monday back in Boston. But they've got amazing deals like flash deals and zone deals where you can pick a section in the arena and then Game Time will pick the seats for you in that section. You get additional savings that way. It's a great experience. I want you guys to check it out. Take the guess work out of buying Basketball Finals tickets with game Time. Download the game Time app, create an account and use code Hoops for twenty dollars off your

first purchase. Terms apply again, Create an account and redeem code Hoops. That's Hops for twenty dollars off your first purchase download game time today, last minute tickets, lowest price guaranteed. All right, let's talk some basketball. For first question, is there any team in the West that would have matched

up well against Boston in the finals. So, as we're looking at this, remember one of the biggest lessons that I learned in this particular postseason run is to look at things more through the concept of the individual matchup rather than what the teams look like in a vacuum. Right, So like, even as we just look at Dallas, they beat the shit out of Minnesota because Minnesota can't handle their rim protection, right, Boston has a counter for their

rim protection through five out spacing. It causes their defense to fall apart, even on the other end of the floor. Like because Minnesota guarded Dallas traditionally, and because Jada McDaniels was too skinny to guard Luca, Luca picked them apart, come into this series bigger, more physical defenders. The adjustment from Jason Tatum, all of a sudden, Dallas's offense falls apart. So it's very much a matchup oriented type of league. So with that being the case, teams that would have

caused Boston more issues. Teams that can guard on the perimeter at multi positions. So teams like Oklahoma City now this year, I thought they were too young and I don't think they would have been able to beat a team like Boston. But the team like Oklahoma City in the future seasons is a team that I think could give Boston some issues. Minnesota. I don't think that I would have picked Minnesota against Boston. It would have been

really close. I would have needed to go back and look at the film, but chances are I would have ended up picking Boston. Who knows, But they have a depth of perimeter defense personnel. They could run lineups with Anthony Edwards, Nikhil, Alexander Walker, Jade McDaniels, Kyle Anderson, Rudy Gobert where all five guys can switch and guard on the perimeter against multiple different types of archetypes of players.

On the other end of the floor, we saw what Anthony Edwards did to Denver and Phoenix because he can beat everyone off the dribble and get into the paint. They ran into rim protection against Dallas. That was a problem against Boston, especially with Porzingis injury issues. They don't really have a lot of rim protection beyond Porzingis, and so that would have been an interesting matchup to see

if Minnesota could have had some success. That said, I think the only team I would have picked against Boston outright would have Ben Denver. And the main reason why is they have some defensive weak points as well. Guys like Jamal Murray, guys like Michael Porter, Junior Jokic did not have a particularly good defensive season this year. However, their game plan discipline, even from their lesser defensive players, including the three I just mentioned, so much better than

what we saw from Luca. Like Luca, we're gonna talk about it in a minute. He was beyond destructive on the defensive end in this series. He wasn't even like, oh, he's got this athletic disadvantage that's causing problems, Like no, he literally wasn't focused, he wasn't playing hard, he was complaining like it. It was an abomination what Luca did

defensively in this postseason run. I think that Denver would have been a little bit more locked in, a lot more locked in down the roster in terms of their commitment to the defensive end, and then on the offensive end, Denver presents an issue for Boston that Boston can't solve, Whereas Boston could solve the Luca problem by putting Tatum on the center, and because they have so many physical perimeter defenders, they were able to have some success against Luca.

Right with Nikola Jokic and his just complete unguardability underneath the basket. By any player that Boston has wearing green, it would have put Boston in a predicament where they would have consistently been in rotation in giving up quality looks, which, by the way, we saw in the regular season when Denver beat Boston twice. There's a physical imposition element too

that can lead to some shooting variants. I will say this though, after watching this series, would I feel more like Boston would have had a better chance to beat Denver. I would have picked Denver by the ever so slightest of margins, and I certainly think Boston would have had a chance. But again, looking forward out of the West, it's gonna have to be teams that can really guard on the perimeter. If it's a Clippers team that stays healthy and actually has Kawhi playing at a top five

level that would be an interesting threat to Boston. Oklahoma City, as I mentioned, obviously, the Denver team that I was just talking about Memphis is a team that might have had some more perimeter defensive personnel to have some success. But that said, Boston I think was clearly better than

everybody in the Western Conference aside from Denver. As I talked about going into the postseason run, the only team that I ranked over Boston the entire season was Denver, and that is the only team I would have picked against them. What are your thoughts about Nick's comparison of Luca's defensive performance with that of Steph in twenty sixteen. I'm assuming this is Nick right, but I'm not certain is there value in separating outcomes and effort while judging defense.

Here's the thing. Steph has physical limitations. He's small, and when he would get attacked and there would be some issues there, it would be like a guy overpowers him, or Kyrie Irving just hits a tough step back jumper over the top of him. In the twenty sixteen finals, very rarely in Steph's career. Was it malaise or just not giving a shit that caused his team to have issues with him on the defensive end of the floor. What Luca did is an entirely different type of destructive

defensive behind behavior. Okay, there's been so much talk about like, oh, well, Luca has so much to do. Oh well, what about Luca's knee. All of this, We're not talking about him being Jalen Brown. We're not asking him to pick up the other team's play best player full court and to fight over the top of ball screens and to be you know, banging bodies on the glass all night long.

That's not what we're talking about. When you are constructing a team defense, there is a minimal level of participation that you have to hit in order for the construct of the team defense to work. And Luca was failing to reach that level, not even coming close to reaching that level. Like there's a lot of focus on the blowbys,

and the blowbys are bad. But you know what, that, to me is almost the least frustrating part about it, because, yeah, we want Luca to get better physically, we want him to take better care of his body, we want him to be healthier, we want him to be able to contain the basketball more that goes without saying, but Luca is never going to be a lateral speed demon. He's just not like he's gonna be to have to do better, and I'm sure he will over the course of his career.

My bigger issue with it was just the simple attention to detail. When you're flopping on three point jump shots and falling on the ground and complaining at the refs while Boston's running the other way, you're actively sabotaging your transition defense and making it impossible for your team to

contain when they're trying to sprint back. In those situations, when you're guarding Sam Hauser in the strong side corner and you're literally several steps off of him, just not paying attention to where Tatum can just throw a simple swing pass to sam Hauser one pass away in the strong side corner and he can knock down a three

in your face. You're not doing your job when you're just standing around the elbow extended as Drew Holliday is sprinting in and out of the lane, grabbing multiple offensive rebounds on the same possession, including a putback, while you're standing on your heels doing nothing on the defensive glass. There are dozens and dozens of examples over the course of this NBA Finals run, in particular, where Luca wasn't just bad on the defensive end, he was embarrassingly disengaged.

He was downright damaging to Dallas' capability to even put out a coherent defense. It was no exaggeration, the worst defensive performance by a superstar that I have ever seen in the NBA Finals. So, like, again, when we talk about criticism and there's I'm generally of the opinion that guys that have a ton of offensive responsibility do need to have lighter defensive workloads. I think that sort of

thing matters. I'm generally of that opinion that said there's a certain minimum level they have to reach, and Luca didn't even come close to reaching that. I thought it was completely unacceptable, And like even comparing it to like Steph in twenty sixteen and some of the other limited defenders in NBA history, to me, it just doesn't doesn't even resemble it. Because say what you want about Steph and his limitations, he was trying, he was doing his

job within the scheme. Luca couldn't even be bothered to do that in this playoff series when evaluating players. This next question is kind of related to that. When evaluating players, do you think individual offense and individual defense should be weight on the same plane. Is it fifty to fifty or should we put more emphasis on one over the other when evaluating individual basketball players. So, I do think

that you can't rank at fifty to fifty. I think that you have to put additional weight on the offensive end. And the main reason why is it is a lot easier to scheme an effective defense with a limited offensive player as a star than it is to on the other end of the floor try to scheme or coach up an effective offense when your superstar is a limited offensive player. For instance, Like let's just make it a

very basic example. Let's say jokichen Janis Jannis is maybe the best defensive player in the world, but if you just ranked his offensive skill set, he's not even in the top five, right, He's somewhere far below that. Right. If you looked at Nikola Jokic, he's the best offensive player in the league, but he's a mediocre to slightly above average defensive player depending on how hard he's trying. In that particular season, I thought he was pretty bad

in this postseason run. I thought he's pretty good last year, right. Who is it easier to build a championship team around. I think it's easier to build a championship team around Yokis because you can construct a role for Jokic to be an effective defensive player, and we've seen the Denver defend at a championship level. Right. But on the other end, Jokic just can make anything work, right. He can create something out of nothing on the offensive end, better than

basically every player in the league at this point. Looking at Yannis, you could get a league average player in construct a role for him at the power forward spot where he's a relatively effective defensive player, But you can't turn around and do that on the offensive end of

the floor, right. Like Giannis's offensive limitations have shown to the surface in the postseason often, they showed up in twenty twenty three when like, yes, I know he dealt with injuries in the Miami Series, but once again close games in the half court, Jimmy was just way better

than him. Right, going back to the seasons before he won the title, going back to twenty twenty, going back to twenty nineteen, it's been a consistent issue through Jannis's career that in the half court when things slow down, his offensive limitations are harder to cope with as a staff and as a franchise than defensive limitations, right, and so again, like I think it's all relative, Like Luca's defensive limitations are so bad that there's a conversation to

be made that Giannis deserves to be over Luca simply because at least he's functional on both ends of the

floor in a way that Luca is not. Right, But yeah, for me, it's just I've probably put it at about like seventy thirty in favor of offense, because I think a super high powered offensive player can kind of overcome everything in a way that is super high powered defensive player that's limited on the offensive end cannot has Jalen Brown now elevated to the Devin Booker tier of players with his playoff performance this year offensively and defensively, He's

been paramount for Boston, where his stock has to be up there as a potential Top twelve guy. Love the show and love the Two Sons Podcast. Stay Ambitious. The Two Sons Podcast is my podcast that I cover like Star Wars, Game with Thrones, basically all television and cinematic media. We just had an episode dropped yesterday on The Acolyte, episode three. You can see the logo right there. It's on YouTube, on two Sons podcast, It's on your podcast

feeds under two Sons Podcast. Make sure you guys get over there and check that out and thank you for supporting both of those shows. As far as Jalen Brown goes, I talked about this with Colin Coward last night. Like, to me, the conversation around the Jays has gone down

some weird paths in this postseason run. I think it's less to do with Jason Tatum's decline and he's had just a really bad jump shooting postseason, which has been a kind of a continuation of an issue that's been kind of propagating over the course of the last two or three seasons. He's at the third consecutive postseason run where he's down year over year from the previous year as a jump shooter, and so that's like a whole other, separate issue. But really just Jaylen Brown's gone up a level.

Jaylen Brown to me, when I'm ranking superstars, there's like the top tier guys, which to me is literally just like Jokic, Luca Yannis, maybe Embiid and Shae depending on who you ask. Those are like the fringe guys in that group. But like those are like the three top tier guys. Then there's like the second tier guys, which are like all the superstars that are just not quite at that level. Right that's Embiid, Shay Tatum, Lebron, Anthony Davis, like Jimmy Butler. There's just a bunch of guys in

that group right well. To me, Jaylen Brown was on the tier below that coming into this season, and right around halfway through the season, he really started to turn it up defensively. He started guarding the other team's best player every single night. He was really committing on that end of the floor. I think it was part of his Like his scoring went down this season just by virtue of all the talent that they brought in, and I think he just trying to find a way to

stay engaged with the team. But between that his development is a pull up jump shooter. I talked about this with Luca or with Luca with Colin last night. I talked about how like it must have been really rewarding for Jalen to hit those big mid range jump shots down the stretch last night. He's been awesome in the clutch in this final series. I thought he had that huge driving left handed layup by Maxi Kliba in Game two.

He hit the two big jump shots last night, like he's just been he's just been playing at that superstar level there that's just below the true top tier guys, and I've just been really impressed by him. And that's the talent influx. The talent influx is, like you know, even with porzingis out, it doesn't change the fact that they have two guys that are in that second tier of superstars, and that's just really difficult to deal with.

I mean, you guys know I'm a Lakers fan. Think about how optimistic I've been about the Lakers consistently and why I've been super optimistic about the Lakers consistently. Why Because they have two guys that are in that second tier superstars in Lebron James and Anthony Davis. Boston has that too, in addition to Drew Holliday, Derek White, Al Horford, Porzingis when he's healthy. I've been really impressed by Howser

and Pritchard and their contributions in this postseason run. But yeah, the rise of Jayalen Brown has infinitely increased the ceiling of this Boston Celtics team. We're this close to crowding a new NBA champion, and with the action heating up on the court, it's even hotter. At Draft Kings Sportsbook, an official sports betting partner of the NBA. Draft Kings Sportsbook has you covered every step of the way with same game parlays, live betting odds, boosts in so much more.

Don't miss out as the NBA postseason winds down. It's super easy to get started with DraftKings. If you're a first timer, try betting on something like a team to win. Go to the Draft Kings Sportsbook app, select your team and place your first bet. It's that simple. The odds in the NBA Finals right now, you can get the Celtics to win at minus two ten or if you're into the underdog Dallas Mavericks, they're at plus one seventy five. And if you're new to DraftKings, you gotta check this out.

New customers, bet five bucks to get one hundred and fifty in bonus bets. Instantly download the draf King Sportsbook AP now and use code hoops that's hops. That's code hoops for new customers to get one hundred and fifty in bonus bets when you bet just five bucks only on DraftKings. The crown is yours. Gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler or in West Virginia, visit www dot one eight hundred gambler dot net. In New York, call eight seven seven eight hope and why, or text hope

and why to four six seven three six nine. In Connecticut, help is available for problem gambling. Call eight eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or visit CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of Boothill Casino and resort in Kansas twenty one plus age varies by jurisdiction void in Ontario. Bonus bets expire one hundred sixty eight hours after issuance. See DKG dot co slash bball for eligibility and deposit restrictions, terms and responsible gaming resources.

How would you rank the last five NBA champions? Specifically talking about the matchup flexibility on a year to year basis, So this was an interesting one. Obviously, we're going to be moving forward in this question assuming that Boston wins the title. Obviously it's not completely over. But I personally think, even juxtaposed with other three to zero series, I don't think this is one that Dallas can turn around. So I do believe that Boston will close it out in

no more than five games. So for me, again, as I mentioned before, I think that this Boston Celtics team is a little less dominant than it looks on the surface. And the reasoning is pretty simple. The Eastern Conference at the bottom was atrocious and so that inflated win totals to a certain extent. To put it simply, you play thirty games against the West, you play fifty two games against your own conference. That is going to make it

so the Eastern Conference win totals are higher. There's a lot of talk about like, oh, this team out West only had forty six wins. O, this team out West only had forty seven, forty eight wins, and it's like, yeah, they're just way more good teams. They can't all have fifty five wins. That's just not how it works, right. So, like the win totals, I think for Boston were a little inflated. There were five good teams in the East, in my opinion, and four of them ended up in

the other end of the bracket. They all beat the hell out of each other to where Indiana, which was probably like I was ranking those teams on the other end of the bracket, like Indiana very against the healthy Bucks and the Sixers, and that Knicks team in the Pacers, I'd probably put the Pacers at the bottom of that list when they're all healthy, right, They beat the Bucks because the Bucks weren't healthy, and by the time that

they got to the Knicks, the Knicks had completely fallen apart, right, So like they faced this injured limited Pacers team in the conference finals, and then out of all of the teams that they could have faced out West, I think Dallas was no higher than third out of those teams in terms of who was best equipped to deal with Boston. And so it's a bona fide NBA championship. They are one of the more dominant champions in terms of on

paper success. However, a couple of specific things, like they do not have that true alpha dog apex superstar, so that would be something that I would hold them back compared to some other champions. So let's talk about the list here, and so I excitded this to six. You asked me for the top five, I'm gonna go to six because that's the delineation after after Kevin Durant and Steph Curry were no longer teamed up with each other

post twenty eighteen, right or twenty nineteen, right. So we have the twenty nineteen Raptors, twenty twenty Lakers, twenty twenty one Bucks, twenty twenty two Warriors, twenty three Nuggets, twenty four Celtics. So at number six, I put the twenty twenty one Bucks. I think that Giannis in that twenty twenty one season was a lesser superstar than some of the other superstars that we've seen, like like Lebron in twenty twenty or Yokic and twenty twenty three, Steph in

twenty twenty two, and Kawhi in twenty nineteen. I think he was behind all of those guys in terms of where the level he was playing at in that particular postseason run that team, also in terms of just top to bottom talent, in terms of the quality of teams they beat along the way like you beat the Trey Young Hawks in the conference final and the Devin Booker Chris Paul Suns in the NBA Finals. So I put the Bucks at the bottom of that list. Number five.

I put the twenty nineteen Raptors similar to the honest thing. I think Kawhi is beneath Steph Jokich and Lebron in terms of like that top tier superstar power. That team was amazing defensively at a big look and a small look, an awesome home court advantage, really really good team, but I don't think they're better than any of the teams above them. Twenty twenty two Warriors I put in at fourth.

The main reason why I have that team down further is like their second best player and third best player were basically like Jordan Poole and Andrew Wiggins in some order. Probably I go Andrew Wiggins too, and then like you know, Jordan Poole, then Draymond Green obviously was amazing defensively in that postseason run. Klay Thompson had a huge fingerprint on

the NBA Finals with his defense on Jalen Like. It was an excellent team that overachieved and won a title with one of the all time great players in NBA history in Steph Curry leading the way. But in terms of just sheer force of talent that that was not something that that Golden State team brought to the table. So I have them a little bit lower at three. I have the twenty twenty four Celtics, and the main case,

there is just overwhelming force of talent. Right you have five players in the open market that would fetch thirty plus million Al Horford if he was a free agent tomorrow and would probably be in that like fifteen to twenty million range. Like, they just have an absurdity of talent. They have an excellent coach in Joe Mizzulu, who really won me over in a big way in this postseason run.

It's been really fascinating just to get a better exposure to the attempts that he's made this year to try to shape the Celtics into a team oriented offense that trusts each other. In Hunt's quality looks, they this is a Celtics team that I didn't really enjoy watching that much during the regular season because of their reticence to really buy into Missoula Ball and what he was asking

them to do. And I actually genuinely enjoy watching the Celtics now in a way that I didn't earlier because they're playing a brand of basketball that I believe is championship worthy. They've won me over at a big way. Jalen Brown, I think has ascended into that second tier of superstars. Awesome team one limitations, they just don't have an apex star. Number two. I put the twenty twenty three Denver Nuggets. I think that Nikola Jokic was and still is the best player in the world. We'll get

into some of those specifics here. I think there's some of it in this mail bag, but definitely over the offseason. But the one limitation there why I have them below the Lakers is their second best player, obviously was Jamal Murray, who in my opinion is in that like fifteen to twenty range. A lot of like really well fitting players, but most of that team came down to Nikola jokicch and what he could do in his unbelievable level of dominance. He's why I have twenty one the twenty twenty Lakers

at one. And look, I get it, I'm biased. I'm a Lakers fan. I'm a Lebron James fan. And by the way, if you guys disagree, I just want to see your rankings. Drop your rankings in the comments. You guys know I go through and read the comments, So drop your individual rankings on the teams and put your reasoning and I'll read through it. And I want to hear your guys take. My take is simple. The twenty twenty Lakers were the only team in that group that

had two top tier superstars. Anthony Davis. Say what you want about him, say what you want about what he's become, say what you want about what he used to be. But in that twenty twenty season, he was unquestionably one of the five best players in the league. He had this like deadly mid range ISO pull up jump shot attack. He legitimately could space the four from the three point line and hit a game winning three point shot in

that playoff series. He was a dominant low post force, and he's the best defensive player in the world who had one of the best defensive playoff runs that we've ever seen. In Lebron James in twenty twenty was the best player in the world. My opinion, should have one MVP that was the year everyone bought into Giannis's advanced metrics just because they kicked the shit out of everybody

in a bad Eastern conference. That team had, in my opinion, the best player in the world in Lebron and the fourth best player in the world in Anthony Davis, while also being a elite defensive team down the roster. There is no other team in that list. Denver did not have two top five players. This Boston team does not have two top five players. That Warriors team did not have two top five players. Neither did the Rafters, neither did the Bucks. And so that's my case. And so

what I want you guys to do. If you're arguing with me and you're saying, Jason, you're an idiot, you're a biased Lakers fan, why do you have the Lakers at one? Tell me what of those other teams conquers the fact that the Lakers had two of the top five players in the world during that span. That's where I think is a good spot to kind of start that debate. But we can get into that more in some mail bags down the line. Next question, even though the NBA has a lot of young, talented players, why

does it not feel as exciting. I thought this was pretty simple. The one. The Eastern Conference playoff picture was just really bad. This year two we have had back to back seasons. This is crazy. I had to go back and look at it. Back to back seasons where in the conference finals the team jumped up three to zero in both conferences. Miami went up three to ohero on Boston. Last year, Denver went up three to oho on the Lakers. Dallas went up three zero in Minnesota.

This year, Boston went up three to zero on the Pacers. Then we go into the NBA Finals. Denver kicked the shit out of Miami last year in Boston's kicking the shit out of Dallas. So for back to back seasons, the second half of the playoff picture has just been garbage, and so I think that that has kind of taken some of the excitement out of it. But I think a lot of that has to do with matchups, A

lot of that has to do with health. So with the team the league getting deeper and more and more good teams entering the picture, I do think that we'll have more exciting playoff runs down the line. Do you think the finals MVP is locked in for Jaln Brown or depending on if it's a sweep in how each JT and him perform, could it defer to Jason Tatum love the show, keep it up. So I think Jalen Brown is the clear Finals MVP to this point. He's

been better statistically. He has the two most iconic plays of the series, those two one handed dunks that he had even on the block of PJ. Washington in transition at the end of Game two was Derek White was in there, but so was Jalen Brown. He hit three of the biggest shots in the series, that driving left handed layup on maxic Cleiba, as well as the pull up jump shots that he hit last night. I think

Jalen Brown is clearly the Finals MVP to this point. Obviously, if JB goes for twelve in Game four and Tatum goes for forty and it's a super close game, you could see potentially as swinging the other way. But to me, Jalen Brown's clearly the Finals MVP at this point. As far as the other element to it, which is like Jason Tatum's responsibilities, which are he could double team more. Obviously, him being on the center is the primary defensive function

that has caused Dallas' offense to fall apart. I do think Tatum's impact in this series is underrated. He's been better than what you would think look at the box score. That said, Jalen Brown also has done a lot of stuff in the details. He's been one of the main guys getting them in rotation Defensively, he's been the guy that's been picking up Luca full court and applying all

that ball pressure and doing all that work. Like to me, even though Jason Tatum has a lot beneath the box score that he's been doing well, it's not enough to make up for the gap. And I think Jalen Brown deserves to win finals. MVP. Do you think the Celtics can continue to win championships if Tatum isn't playing at a top five level, because it's pretty clear that he won't reach that top tier as long as those five guys are together, even just Horford and with those four guys, yeah,

forget about it. Let's just take the center position and position out of it. As long as Eric White, Jalen Brown, Jason Tatum, and Drew Holliday are together, I think that they're going to have a really good chance to win. I agree with Colin last night he said he said that the Celtics team is too weird to like win three or four in a row. I agree with that, But they're too talented to not win at least one

and to be in the picture every year. And if they're in the picture every year, all takes is an injury here, favorable matchup there to get a win. And so I think if someone asked me, is it more likely than not that Boston wins another one in the next two seasons, I'd say yes, I think it's more likely than not that Boston wins another one at some point in the next two seasons. They're durable, they're young, they're athletic, they just they check so many boxes. They're

just gonna be in the picture. That said every team that won the championship over the last six years. Do you guys remember Nuggets fans last year all summer long, how confident and arrogant they were. Remember Warriors fans the year before, Remember Bucks fans the year before that, Remember Lakers fans. I mean, we're still arrogant, you know what I mean? So like we like you got to remember that, like every team that hoists the trophy thinks they're the

team that figured it out. They're about to go on a run. Boston, Actually I do think has a chance to win multiple so does Denver. But we found out pretty quickly that it was kind of a flash and a pan thing with that Warriors team and with that Bucks team. Right, so something to keep in mind. Let's see, we'll do one more and then we'll get out of here. Hey, Jason, love the work you've been doing. You've really made me

fall in love with the game again. My question is did this year's playoffs affect how you look at future playoff series? And if it did, how so? So this has been and we're going to do a deeper version of this right after the NBA Finals end. It'll probably be one of the early videos we do next week every year. If those are guys who followed the show, I do like a five biggest lessons I learned. But if I had to give like a quick elevator pitch on it, it's pretty simple to me. I do think

it's important to run five out offense. You guys who have followed the show for a while know that I used to be a huge proponent, not a huge proponent, but a defender of that four out kind of brute force type of attack. But when you have the four out brute force kind of attack, I think you need

multiple physically imposing players for that to work. And I think that one of the things that's happened is Dallas has been reliant a lot on pull up jump shooting because of this adjustment that Boston's made, and it's kind of stagnated things. It's made the role players play poorly. Kyrie and Luca haven't been able to hit enough of them right. And so I think teams that have more ball in player movement that keep all five players involved just have some more resilience when they get to the

later levels of the playoffs. So, like to me, ideally you want to run a five out offense with five offensive threats. They don't all have to be shooters, but they all need to be offensive threats in some way, shape or form, even if it's just like a screener and cutter. Right. But I think that that's an important piece that I'd look at, Like, I think that that's an important lesson to learn, is that teams that run five out multiple players of multiple threats, lots of ball

and player movement on the other end of the floor. Again, this is something that I've always believed but I think has been hammered home in a big way in this postseason. Defensive versatility. You have to be able to guard multiple ways. If you can load up on a team to guard, that's great, But you better be able to guard a team that spreads you out as well, a team that can test your perimeter defense and test your ability to

contain in rotation. So next year, when we see a team that has a great defensive rating that loads up the paint and drop coverage and uses the low man and loads up the strong side, but they have multiple weak perimeter defensive points, just something to keep in mind as we go into the postseason. We'll get into way more detail about that when we get into this summer. As always, I appreciate you guys for participating in the mail bag and for supporting the show. We're gonna be

back tomorrow night, no calling tomorrow, just me live. After the final buzzer of Game four. I will see you guys though the volume

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android
Open in Metacast