The volume.
The NBA Finals are almost here and every play could be the one that changes everything. This is the NBA Playoffs where heroes rise, legacies are built, and the action never lets up. And with DraftKings Sportsbook and official sports betting partner of the NBA, you don't just watch the madness, you live it. Back your favorite team, ride with your clutch, time killer, bet on the buzzer beaters, the breakout performances, the game winning threes, from player props to same game parlays.
This is how you take your fandom to the next level. The New York Knicks, after beating the Celtics are up to plus three sixty, is the second best odds to win the title. Surprisingly, the Pacers back at plus six hundred because my initial thought on that series is I want to pick the Pacers. But some interesting championship oods
right now. New to the game, no sweat, Download the DraftKings Sportsbook, gap bet just five dollars and if your bet wins, you'll score three hundred dollars in bonus bets. It's that easy. I don't know the DraftKings Sportsbook app and use code hoops. That's code hoops h Oops for new customers to get three hundred dollars in bonus bets if your bet wins. When you bet just five bucks only on DraftKings, the Crown is yours. Gambling problem called
one hundred gambler. In New York call eight seven seven eight hope and why, or text hope and why to four six seven three six y nine. In Connecticut, help is available for problem gambling. Call eight eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or visit CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of Boothill Casino and Resort. In Kansas twenty one plus age in eligibility varies by jurisdiction void in Ontario. Bet must win to receive reward.
Bonus bets expire one hundred and sixty eight hours after issuance. For additional terms and responsible gaming resources, see dkang dot co. Slash audio. All right, welcome to hoops tonight. You're at the volume heavy Saturday. Everybody. Oh loo. If you guys are having a great start to your weekend, well, we have our twenty twenty five NBA Finals between the Oklahoma
City Thunder in the Indiana Pacers. As the tail end of the series went more or less as I kind of expected it would at the beginning of the series. I thought that the Pacers would win in six. The only thing that got kind of flipped around is the Pacers stole an extra game in New York and the
Knicks stole an extra game in Indiana. But the Knicks actually came out and brought a decent amount of fight through the first two quarters, dominated the offensive glass, but way too many mistakes throughout, especially in their transition defense, especially with like miss free throws and just turnovers things
along those lines. And ultimately, the team that was more disciplined and that had a kind of a more attention to detail throughout the season and a team that practiced playing a sharper brand of basketball got the job done. And we're gonna be talking about that. Off the top, we'll talk a little bit about the game itself, We'll look let ahead to the NBA Finals for a little bit. We'll talk about the Knicks and just some of my
frustrations with them and what the future looks like. And then at the tail end of the show, we'll take ten to fifteen minutes of questions from our chats. Make sure you guys get some questions in the chat. You guys are the job before we get started. Subscribe to the Hoops to Night YouTube channels you don't miss any more of our videos. Follow me on Twitter at underscore Jason
lt so you guys don't miss show announcements. Don't forget about a podcast for you where you get your podcasts or Hoops Tonight's also super helpful if you leave a lady rating and a review. On that front, Jackson's doing great work on our social media feeds on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and TikTok. Make sure you guys follow us there, and last but not least, keep dropping those questions in the chat so that we can get to them at the
tail end of the show. When we finish here tonight, we're going to be moving over to Playback that's playback dot tv slash Hoops Tonight. There we're going to be taking callers, watching some film, just hanging out kind of like an inful role basketball hour that we have as the Hoops Tonight community, just kind of having fun. We bring fans up from the teams that we got some Pacers fans that I'm looking forward to having their moment tonight.
If you guys want to join us over there, just go to playback dot tv slash Hoops tonight as soon as we finish here on YouTube. All right, let's talk some basketball. So I want to start by just saying congratulations to the Pacers and to Pacers fans. This is a huge deal making it to the finals. If you don't think so, all you have to do is look around in recent NBA history and look at how inconsistent anybody's been in terms of getting to the finals since
Katie left the Warriors. And one of the things that I think has stood out to me in a big way in this particular playoff run is these two teams that have made it. They're obviously talent. There's talent involved, right even with Indiana, like Pascal Siakam's a hell of a player, Tyres Haliburn is a hell of a player, nem Hardnee Smith, Turner going to the bench, getting contributions from guys like Thomas Bryant, Nobi Toppa. We're gonna be
talking about all these guys today. But I would say the Pacers are not necessarily the most talented roster in
the league in terms of just overwhelming talent. The Thunder definitely have a lot of talent, but they're not, you know, like what the Celtics were last year in terms of like just a bunch of like certified, like six like certified high level veteran starters that have been in wars and that have been super experienced through previous playoff runs and like the specifically looking at the compared to other like super talented teams in recent NBA history, like the
Kevin Durant Warriors, or like Lebron Dwayne Wade, Chris Boshet, they're not on that level. But they just put together one of the most dominant seasons through to the end of the Conference finals that we've seen in recent NBA history. And it's a casual reminder for all of us that when you play great basketball, it makes it a lot easier to win. Like, make no mistake, guys, this series was won. This series Pacers Knicks was one on the margins.
The Pacers scored more than twice as many points off of turnovers in this series than the Knicks did before tonight, and then they put the nail in the coffin with a thirty four point in transition night point off of turnover night thirty four points off of turnovers for the Pacers, thirteen points off of turnovers for the Knicks. Gigantic margin. And as far as like any sort of you know, oh,
or we're selling out to the offensive glass. That's why we're not getting and we're not getting back in transition, And we're gonna talk a little bit about that with the Knicks in a little bit as they put together quite possibly the most embarrassing night of transition defense I've ever watched is the Pacers in a must win elimination game just got leak out after leak out after leakout.
But like whatever offensive rebound advantage there was coming into tonight, the Knicks got just two and a half points more on second chance points than the Pacers did. The Pacers dominated this series on the margins. Talent goes a long way, I would argue on paper, this Knicks team is flat out more talented than the Pacers, which is why we talked about when the Knicks were at their best. They actually had moments in this series where they looked like
a better team. Brief moments, but moments. But that's not all that goes into making a good basketball team. You have to win by playing great basketball. It doesn't matter who's on the floor. If you're not playing great basketball, you're not going to win. And talent can bring a certain amount of great basketball to the table by sheer force of competitive will and that talent. But it can't cross all the boxes. It can't do all the things that you need to do to win games. I talked
about coming into tonight. If you guys, remember I said, I know what to expect from the Pacers. I know they're going to pick up full court and bring just a hillacious defensive effort. Andrew and Emhart tonight just like single handedly chop the head off the Knicks offense all night by just making Jalen Brunson's life a living hell.
All of those turnovers are forced by that ball pressure, by playing passing lanes, by maintaining a simple defensive identity that this team has had for damn near six months now. This is who they are. This is what they do every single game. Oh you scored, we don't care, We're
already running. You see it, Like when you watch the Pacers, you can see it when a dude gets an advantage and goes all the way in for a layup, dudes are already starting running the other way because they know they have an opportunity to erase that quickly with a
kick ahead pass. There is even just down the stretch of the game, just the quick whirling actions at the top of the key, two man action, three man action, steady diet of Tyrese Haliburton on ball, like picking catapart with floaters, making simple reads to guys slipping out of screens like ob topping out to the top of the key or Obi topping slipping down the lane for a dunk. Just easy read, Oh, cat's too far, or cats coming up to the level and putting two on the ball.
We're just gonna drop it back to Obi top in that's top of the key for three. Oh cats up at the level and they're not tagging the low man, and we're running a stack action and someone's slipping to the top of the key topp ens rolling hit him with the bounce pass. He's dunking it with one hand. There is a steady basketball identity that has been built out from the top down with the pacers that carries them into a situation where then their talent can put
them over the top. And yes, there have been moments Aaron E. Smith's shooting in Game one, right, Tyre's Halliburton throughout the series, Pascal Siakam tonight, just getting bucket after bucket. There's a lot of talent there, but the talent is put in position to succeed because the Pacers have put in the work to make themselves an extremely sharp and discipline basketball team. Let me just put it to you
in a very basic way. Teams that don't get back in transition and give up layup lines off of made baskets are not champion basketball teams. They are not champions. Champions don't do that. Champions don't make silly, sloppy mistakes over over and over again. They don't make fixable mistakes over and over again. They identify their mistakes, they rectify them.
I'd argue this was in Game six, the worst transition defense night that the Knicks had several possessions where all five dudes are south of the free throw line, meaning there's nobody up at the top of the key ready in back court balance. I saw multiple examples a couple of guys that have caught Landry Shaman and Mitchell Robinson in situations where they're back, but they're not paying attention and someone's behind them. Like, that's basic stuff. Ball rim
spread out to shooters. That's literally the process of transition defense. If you have your balance set, meaning as if you've got a driver and a roller coming off the top of the key, you have your guys relocate off the corner so that there's somebody north of the foul line that can get back in transition. This is basic stuff. Guys. We teach this in high school. This is not advanced
basketball schematics. Floor balance, get back, stop ball, protect the rim at the very least make them make a three. But I mean there were there was a missed free throw, a miss free throw for the Knicks. I think it was kat where the Pacers just swung the ball off the floor and got a wide open three for Aeronniemith on a free throw. That that is just straight up not a championship basketball team. You don't see the Pacers making those kinds of mistakes. You don't see the Thunder
making those kinds of mistakes. And it's just a casual reminder, Like we can talk about player movement this summer, we can talk about theoretical theoretical basketball fit for Yannis with Victor woman Yama on the Spurs and the Knicks. We could talk about with the Knicks, like what if they trade Cat for Kde or something like that. None of it matters if you don't use the regular season to practice playing great basketball, because ultimately it's gonna be what
decides your fate. The Knicks had so many chances to win this game. Thirty four points off of turnovers, you're dead on a rival. I just thought it was such an interesting juxtaposition in this series, two teams, very talented. Nick's probably more talented Knicks when they're at their best, look a little bit better. Didn't matter because the Pacers were steady. The Pacers were steady and played Pacers basketball and just waited for the Knicks to soil themselves, and
inevitably they did. Yeah, it doesn't matter who you are. You can run the floor. It doesn't matter who you are. You can do these basic things that Rick Carlisle has these guys doing on every single possession, and you will grab a ton of low hanging fruit and you're gonna give yourself a great chance to win games. Pascal Siakam was absolutely amazing tonight. He's a classic example of what
I'm talking about with those runouts. Sorry, the ESPN website isn't pulling up the box score, is gonna just play an ad. There's a There's this thing that Pascal Siakam has been doing this entire postseason, just pushing the ball up the floor, like every time that there's any sort of opportunity, he's leaking out and it's just they're throwing it to him like he's a wide receiver run in his street and he's just catching it and making a quick move against some one on one or maybe getting
a dunk. He gets all sorts of opportunities like that, the pick and pop action, just hitting important threes at the top of the key, the quick ISOs, the quick turnarounds over both shoulders, the getting to the foul line. Like, Siakam was an absolute monster tonight. Andrew Nemhard was doing such a good job on Jalen Brunson. You could literally see the frustration building to like a fever pitch. I
was texting Jackson during the game. I was like, We're like one more hard bump in like a fifteen point game from this turning into some sort of physical altercation between Brunson and Nemhard because they were like jawn at each other. But that's the thing Nemhard like, I admire the hell out of this from basketball players. Nedmar had a rough series offensively, couldn't make a shot to save
his life. A lot of like uncharacteristic decisions on drives and in the decision zone, kind of there in the middle of the floor. But like, what do I always say? What do I always say? Just make a play, find a way to do something that helps your team win the game. And Aaron Nesmiths having an ankle issue. I don't know if that was the reason why they did the switch today or if Nemhar just straight up went to Rick Carlisle and said, Hey, I'm sucking on offense
right now. Give me something where I can like pour my heart and soul into it and try to make something happen. But he just did as good a job guarding of one of the best point guards in the league as you'll see. And then you could tell he was leaving a jump shot short. Then he has two massive threes in the second half, and on those threes, you can you'd literally see Nemhard like dip super low,
even though he's wide open. You could see him dip super low to get his legs into the shot, and it's like, just make one, just make one, and then it doesn't matter that he had a rough series. No one cares about Nemhart having a rough series now because in Game six he locked Jalen Brunton up and hit a couple of huge baskets down the stretch, a couple of big drop coverage shots too. Like he stayed in it mentally, never let go of the rope, and found a way to leave a lasting imprint on the series.
But before it was done, Obi top In I thought there were several key sequences tonight where he made plays that kind of were like, uh, like what I would consider like ceiling raising type of plays were not necessarily in the flow of the game, but like shots that are being conceded and you have no choice but to
beat the coverage by knocking down those shots. Big pick and pop three at the top of the key late that role, late in the game, there was a three that he hit kind of off of movement in the I think it was an early second quarter where there's a really good defensive possession from the Knicks where everybody's doing all the right stuff, and then I think Kat was lazy on one little dho at the top of the key and he just rises and fires from like twenty six feet off the move, rises up and knocks
it down. His run, his lane running and transition all series long. He was awesome. Thomas Bryant three massive threes out of the corners in this game tonight. Every single one of them felt like a huge shotgun blast to the chest for the Knicks, just massive, massive shots. And
then I thought, Tyre's Halliburton. You know, he's been facing the brunt of the aggressive aggression in the Knicks coverages in this series and like taking simple reads like they're in that second half, he really started to assert himself in control of the offense and like, oh, you're leaving Topping on the pop, I'm gonna hit this. Oh you're leaving Topping on the role, I'm gonna hit this. Okay, you're gonna let me operate in this soft ass February
drop coverage. I'm just gonna hit floater after floater after floater out that Halliburton was fantastic, just a just a wired to wire, super super impressive playoff run from the Pacers, and now they're in the final.
Blending Vice's signature dynamic storytelling with the high octane world of sports, Vice Sports brings an exciting and diverse range of programming that goes beyond the game. From action pack live events to gripping behind the scenes documentaries to hard hitting investigative pieces and in depth profiles of athletes, coaches, teams. Vice Sports captures the raw energy, drama, and passion that makes sports truly unforgettable. Catch live events and other exclusive
sports programs only on Vice TV. Go to vicetv dot com to find your cable channels.
Now, looking ahead to the finals, I think the first key is going to be managing ball pressure, as you guys. As you guys have seen in this series, there have been several stretches where the Nicks did some damage to the Pacers with their ball pressure. The thunder Age is way better at it. They've got better defenders, more of the better matchups too. They're not like big lanky dudes that are not necessarily as quick footed as Tyre's Halliburton.
They've got guys that are quicker than Tyres Haliburton. That'll be on him the entire series, and so everything's going to be about managing that ball pressure. I think it's going to be vitally important for the Pacers to have success attacking in the post through Pascal Siakam and Myles Turner.
One of the reasons why is if Haliburton does his job, which is handle the ball pressure, doesn't turn the ball over, and OKASE is super aggressive with their coverages two on the ball, packing the paint, playing passing lanes, and Haliburton makes the passes and the Pacers shoot them out of it. Mark Dagnaut will default two more switching and to staying home off ball, and in that series, in that setting, it is no longer a Haliburton series in terms of
ISO scoring the advantage. Again, the Thunders, they're small on the perimeter and so it's gotta be Siakam and as we saw in the Minnesota series and in the Denver series, it's extremely difficult to make post entries against the Thunder. They three quarter front, they full front, they bracket from behind, They do all sorts of stuff to make that passing angle difficult. And if OKC goes to switching and goes
to staying home. The key to the series will be getting the ball to Siakam to turner deep seals, and then that being the entry point either high quality two's right at the front of the rim or drawing multiple defenders to get the defense in rotation. Ultimately, if you want the Pacers to play Pacers basketball, they're gonna have to manage ball pressure and they're gonna have to move the ball efficiently through Oklahoma City's aggressive defense, and it's
gonna be a very very different challenge. I look at this series as a particularly tough one for the Pacers early on because they are just not exposed to this level of defense yet. The Bucks out obviously, We're horrendous all year, The Knicks were horrendous all year, The Cavs sneaky, were mediocre on defense for basically the second half of the year. This is arguably the greatest defense that we've seen in recent NBA history. So it's going to be
a very very different sort of challenge for them. But they do in theory. What do I always say, what do you need to beat Oklahoma City's defense? You need size, you need playmaking, and you need shooting. And they do have the size it just comes in the form of Siakam, right.
They have tons of playmaking talent and everyone can shoot, but it's in a matchup where the Pacers typically have a lot of success with their guard play TJ McConnell, Tyrese Halliburn, Andrew Nemhart, even Niesmith to a certain extent, Ben Mathern. In a series like this, those guys don't have the advantage all of a sudden. It's going to be a lot of pressure on Siakam to be that guy who's initiating the offense with size and then as a team playmaking out of it in finishing plays by
knocking down shots, handling game plan tweaks. As I said, I think Dagnault will come out with their base pressure scheme and load up scheme, but I think it's very possible that they pivot out of that and the Pacers are going to have to have some different punches in
their bag guarding she. On the other end of the floor, we saw the Timberwolves have more success in their series with quicker defenders on say, kind of like more of a beating him to spot style of approach and forcing him to shoot over the top the Pacers have lots of guys that can do that. The Pacers, in theory have personnel that matches up reasonably well with Oklahoma City.
I'm actually a lot more bullish on the Pacers' ability to get stops against Oklahoma City that am on their ability to score, which is hilarious considering the strength of this Pacers team is their offense. But guarding Shee again, it's going to be a steady diet of Nie Smith and Nemhart and TJ McConnell beating him to spots, not getting handsy to where you can get in trouble with the whistle, and then forcing him into a bunch of
mid range jump shots and then forcing kickouts again. The finals are stressful, totally different setting, totally different level of intensity, totally different media presence, totally different production quality. It is a foreign entity compared to the rest of the NBA Playoffs. There's a lot of young dudes in that Thunder locker room, and so you have to for Shae to pass and force these young, inexperienced players to knock down, catch and shoot jump shots. We are going to start I'm going
to start watching film for Pacers. Thunder tomorrow morning. We will have a bunch of preview content coming out on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday next week. I will keep you guys posted as soon as we have a more firm schedule. But keep an eye on my Twitter feed tomorrow morning because I'll probably be watching some of that film and just kind of tweeting out little things that I find interesting. But we will have our first bit of finals coverage starting
on Monday on the Knicks front. Before we get to our mailbag. To put it very simply, we can talk about what they want to do with the roster. I think Karl Anthony Towns has proven pretty resoundingly to this point that he is a guy that has a certain ceiling. That ceiling is he is inconsistent as an offensive player and downright bad as a defensive player as the leverage and intensity of the situation gets higher later in the playoffs.
And this is back to back years in the conference finals where I can almost like specifically point to him as a big part of why they lost, and it's there are just certain guys that are not built for this style of basketball, in this sort of setting, and to have a salary slot as large as cats for a player that is as damaging as he was as they were just picking him a part on defense in this game, way too deep in his drop, sometimes active
up high but giving up easy pocket passes. At other times he's a brutal part of their bad transition defense. It's all of the above. So we can talk about pivot off of Cat, and that's what I would do. I would pivot off of Cat and I would build around defense around Brunson. This has to be a sharper, better, deeper defensive team. All that's fine. None of it matters if you don't play a sharper brand of basketball. And
some of this is on tips. Tom Thibodeau is the coach of this team, and by the sixth game of the series, his team looked like it had no idea how to handle the Pacers in transition. And it wasn't like, oh my god, they're pushing the ball off the floor and we're doing our job, but they're just putting us in a blender of quick transition action. No, these are wide open, kick ahead, leak out dunks and wide open
kickout threes. There is a reality with Tom Thibodeau that he trusts the top end of his roster so much that he leans on them so heavily that it's kind of impossible for him to be as detail oriented as he needs to be. How could you be that detail oriented when a guy's playing forty something minutes a night. There's too many opportunities for fatigue to enter into the equation.
The Knicks have to, regardless of what roster changes are made, starting in early October next year, culturally, from the top down, embrace a sharper and more detail oriented brand of basketball. You lost your opportunity to go to the finals this year because you were an undisciplined team, not because you didn't have the talent to hang with the Pacers. Easy way to do that be more willing to use your bench. From day one, we're running a nine to ten man rotation.
Here are basic defensive principles. Does that mean you need to pick a full court all series or all season. No, but come up with some basic things. We are going to pressure the ball after half court at a bare minimum, because that is an easy way to just make ball handlers uncomfortable, which can have all sorts of trickle down effects in the game. In general, I think the brunts and bridges o g Nnobi specifically heart bridges and Anonoby are just so good in transition. You got to try
to feed as many transition opportunities as possible. And you're gonna do that with ball pressure at bare minimum, ball pressure at half court at a bare minimum, a basic set of like three different coverages that you trust and man a man situations based with Brunson and with Cat or whoever it is that you bring back, and then attention to detail throughout the season, making sure that these are sharp so you don't have breakdowns taking place in
the playoffs where like dudes are pointing at each other like you're supposed to do this, You're supposed to do that. You looked like that all season. Not surprised that you looked like that when it came down when it came time to get the job done in the playoffs. There is a there is an order of operations to being a champion, and it starts in October with attention to detail. It's a mandatory tell me, tell me the time. Can can anybody think of like a sloppy basketball team that
won the title. The Celtics last year weren't sloppy. The Nuggets weren't sloppy in twenty twenty three, the Warriors weren't sloppy, the Bucks weren't sloppy, the Lakers weren't sloppy. That's like a that's literally a non negotiable. You cannot get to the Promised Land if you practice playing sloppy basketball. So regardless of what the Knicks do this summer, that is a non negotiable. They need a basketball culture reset either. Someone needs to sit down with TIBs and be like, hey, dude,
we got to change our approach. Stop riding everybody super high minutes, extend your rotation, and actually start holding these guys accountable to the details night in and night out throughout the regular season. That way, we can be the best version of ourselves when we get to June, when we get to may Or, if he's not up for it and you need to change a voice in the locker room, make a move and bring in a coach that can be the guy that highlights that low hanging fruit.
The Pacers aren't going anywhere. The Celtics are going to be in a pivot year. Obviously, the Bucks are going to be in a pivot year. Obviously. The East is gonna be pretty open. But you're gonna be right back here, maybe in round two, maybe in round three dealing with the Pacers, And what am I gonna be saying? I know what I'm getting from the Pacers because the Pacers have a top down basketball identity, from Kevin Pritchard to Rick Carlisle, all the way down that roster, starting with
Tyre's Halliburton. This is the way they play. They don't cut corners, and so they are always the very best version of themselves. And that's why they're going to the finals. All right, Jackson's gonna come on. We're gonna take some questions.
Let's do it. First question, Pascal Siakam won Eastern Conference Finals MVP. Do you feel like Halliburton got snubbed?
I'm gonna say no, just simply because there were stretches of this series where Tyre's Halliburton was somewhat, you know, disengaged as a product of the defensive scheme that he was facing. And I did think Siakam was more or less as good as Halliburton. It just manifests in different ways. Like with Tyre's Halliburton, He's always going to be better than what the box score will lead you to believe simply because of the simply because of the advantage creation aspect.
But with Pascal Siakam, like he's been the guy who they've leaned on for like, oh, this isn't working, we need to create a shot, Like he's the guy. He's the one guy who can go get a bucket. And by the way, in the game to win thirty nine points in the game, four win thirty points in the game, six win thirty one points. So in three of their four wins he had over thirty points. I'm not going to call that a snub under any circumstances.
He's such a stabilizer for them and such a floor razer. It's it's hard to think about teams that have their second best player. I think it's even though he was you know, the series MVP Halliburn is their best player. It's it's it's not that many examples of teams but their second best player is such a stabilizer for them. It's really interesting and impressive from his standpoint.
He's a pretty consistent player too, with just the way that he runs. I will say he was rough in game five, and that was definitely unusual.
One.
The entire team was kind of bad in Game five, but yeah, that was definitely bad. The I also thought that he did a great job on Kat defensively tonight, kept stonewalling him on those like volleyball drives and was attacking the basketball and forcing him to lose control, like Sacham was just awesome. And I think, I mean, we can all admit this. I thought he'd like straight up, flat out outplayed cat headhead in the series.
Yeah, definitely. And the I mean, we we on this show and you are not expecting the Pacers to win the finals, but if the Pacers win the finals, we're gonna have to have some Pascal Siakam conversations as he will now be the second best player on multiple different championship teams with multiple franchises. Like that is not that many people can say that.
I think it's just a classic example of like the simple dynamic that you and I have talked about so many times over the season, and in terms of just like the whole playoff riser thing is real and it all comes down to some basic things to me, Like there's a certain like size and strength element to it.
There's a certain versatile element to it. Those two things are vital because in the playoffs it just gets so physical, and teams game plan you, so if you don't have if you have too many weaknesses to expose rather than having a well rounded game, you'll run into issues. The third part of it is I'm I'm a huge believer that like, even amongst competitors, there's levels to competitiveness. I always joke about this, but like I would much rather play in terms of having a teammate a fox hole guy.
I would much rather play with a guy who hates losing than a guy who loves basketball. Now, I want both, and the best players of all time are always both. But like I have a hard time relating to someone that doesn't like get fucking mad about losing, like angry,
like viscerally upset about losing. Like to me, that emotion, that hatred of losing is what drives a basketball player to be detail oriented and to not cut corners and to do all the things you've got to do, and like, say what you want about you know some of these dudes like Andrew nemhard for instance, but like there is a there is like a sheer competitive fire, like he wanted to embarrass Jalen Brunson tonight down the stretch Nemhart did, and so like, yeah, like part of that playoff riser
thing to me is always going to be that competitiveness, like do you have the will to fight more than the guy across from you?
Yeah, and the Pacers have. I mean, you could probably say they've been a lot of their players, but specifically three in their starting lineup. I think Nie Smith and Nemhard and Pascal are all very much that type.
Of player classic playoff risers.
Uh super chat from jm Rciakam and Nie Smith the key to beating Oka. See what would it take for Indy to beat Okac four times?
I'm gonna say yes to both of those because I think Nie Smith will be the primary matchup on Shay and uh if if Nie Smith can prevent Shae from getting easy dribble penetration so that it's not like you're badly compromised right off the bat over and over again with the screen navigation that he did in this series,
I think that would go a long way. Jada McDaniels in the Conference finals, I thought did an awful job of containing the ball in like in kind of a way that was so weird to have me like rethinking like defensive player archetypes, and Nie Smith is the kind of archetype theoretically that is, like he is so laterally quick that he should be able to at least as long as he doesn't get screened, keep Shay reasonably in front.
If he does, then Shay is going to be throwing kickouts to advantages that are like advantages but not like the oh my god, he got super deep into the paint and drew four bodies in and this is like a standstill, close out opportunity kind of thing. So Nie Smith is the key to the defensive matchup, and then Siakom to me is the key of the offensive matchup.
Because I think there's a chance that Halliburton like straight up folds right to start this series like that that's on the table, like he's kind of done it against Dort before and it could be something that becomes a problem.
Uh.
But either way, if Halliburton's fantastic to start the series because of the coverages, I think Dagnaut will audible to switching and to staying home, and if he does, it's going to become a matchup attacking series, and it'll be I'll take it a step further. It'll be it'll be Nie Smith on Ball on Shay, It'll be Siakam attacking matchups.
And then I think another guy that I would put as a key there is actually Ben Matherin, because I think Ben Mathern is one of the few guys who has the athleticism to like just to just break down Oklahoma City's defense at the point of attack.
That's a good segue into our next question, which is who is the most important pacer on offense other than Halliburton and Siaco offense only.
Okay, it'll be I want to take it a step further because Mathern is obviously going to be in somewhat of a limited role. I think Miles Turner hitting pick and pop three's is such a huge, like foundational thing, Like if he's not hitting pick and pop threes, then you can run drop. If you can run drop or I excuse me, not even drop, you can run at
the level. If if you can bring your big up to the level and not have to worry about Turner slipping out of the screen and hitting threes, that's that's a huge that that's a huge upside to your defense. So like Turner hitting pick and pop threes, I think is huge. I would say down the roster shooting in general, shooting against really good closeouts. I think mathurd would probably fourth for me there, Like, I think Mathurin is going to be huge like them Hard to me, like it
kind of is what he is. You know, I'm not counting on him to be like the dominant force, but actually, you know what, we should probably move them Hard up because if Halliburton does kind of succumb to the dort thing, Nemhard will be their point guard. And we looked in the regular season and in the footage we watched them, Hard was getting the ball over and over again.
Yeah, I was gonna say tonight it felt like because of the ball pressure from Game five, it felt like they ran a handful more of those stacks may pick and rolls with Nemhard being the lead ball handle at Haliburton being the third guy to sort of hopefully do and I expect a lot of that, a lot of that.
I think that's gonna have to be there. One of their pet actions in terms of like keeping them Halliburton involved when he's being denied it did seem like Nemhard got a little bit of his mojo back tonight, which I think would be key.
Yeah, I agree. Next question, we'll take a couple more before playback. When was the last time that you can remember, if you can remember at all, that to both finals teams played a ten to eleven man rotation. It's kind of crazy that both teams are sort of following that same model a little bit.
I know. I like, well, the Celtics were like pretty much running an eight man rotation last year. The Nuggets ran a tight rotation, the Warriors ran a little bit of a longer rotation. But I still think it was like it was like eight or nine yes that year because because it was like Looney and in Auto Porter Junior Jordan Poole. Yeah, I don't I can't think of one. Yeah, dude,
that's that's that's crazy. Like, you know what's been interesting though, is like we all have our ideologies and like I even have like a list that I always give out when someone says, like, oh, what's the best way to build a basketball team, And I'm like, Okay, you want a skill guard, you want an athlete guard, you want a kind of a skinnier perimeter, perimeter wing, a bigger forward.
All that sounds great, but like you kind of two things. One, you don't know what kind of roster you're gonnaend up getting, and you kind of have to build your team around what that roster is. And then two, like there are more there is more than one way to win a basketball game. They're just they're flat out is and so like what's super fascinating is like you can win a basketball game being the Indiana Pacers picking up full court,
playing at absurd pace and blah blah blah. You could also win a basketball game being like the Dallas Mavericks last year and like walking the ball up the court with Luca and just like methodically walking teams now with half court offense, Like there's there's more than one way to skin a cat, so to speak like that. It just is it's fascinating to me that we've seen these two particular of their team's matchup, because it kind of felt very war of attritiony at times in this postseason.
And these are the younger, deeper teams that play this like kind of hillacious style, but they also don't tax any of their players that much because they keep Fitts down. Like it's kind of like a super fascinating concept. I want to emphasize too, there are guys in these rotations that, like, if they were playing for your team, you probably wouldn't think they're as good as they look on the pacers, So like, don't don't underestimate the organizational element of making
depth useful. Like like I like I watched Jordan Goodwin be okay and in other situations, but I watched him with the Lakers be fantastic because he's on a team that just needed an athletic guard that can do basic stuff like you need you need to like with your roster, draft players and go after players that fit an identity that matches your team so that in the regular season, whether you're using the fifteenth man or the eighth man, there's like this role that just like makes sense in
your offense that like this guy's like to Obi Topping comes in and plays the same role that Siakam plays like literally and and it's a rough approximation of it, but he comes in and does the same thing. And because he has some useful skills that kind of fit into that role, it makes him a useful player, like I don't think it's a coincidence that Landry Shammitt looked
useful in this series. Like land there are a lot of players like Lanzer Shammitt out there in the league that can play playoff minutes for you, as long as you set up the appropriate structure for them to thrive in.
We'll take two more questions. This one's a super chat for Matt. Thank you for the super chat, he says. He says, not an NBA expert, but there seems to be some sort of intangible switch or crunch time magic to this Pacers team that I can't put my finger on. Is that crazy? What can you attribute that to?
So I do Okay, I I think I'm gonna this is complicated because I think, on the one hand, I think it has as much to do with the other team letting go of the rope as it does with them them hitting a switch. I do think that they feel the magic a little bit like you could feel it in Game one, Like you could feel it in Game one where it's like, oh, like they know, they're like we've done this before, We're gonna do it again. Yeah, there's definitely a little bit of like they feel the magic.
But at the same time, like I would equate it to, they play the same way no matter what, regardless of the time in the game. And there is a natural human nature piece when a team goes up by ten to fifteen points in the final four or five minutes where they just naturally relax, and that when you relax while the Pacers are still playing Pacers basketball just kind of naturally manifest in these like easy runouts and easy quick buckets, and that's more or less the genesis of it.
Yeah, last question before we go over to playback, and next question, if you had to pick one big change for the next this summer between these two, would you, Jason Timp choose to trade Cat or fire Tips have.
To choose one, have to choose one. I think I trade Cat. So this is complicated, but like, do you remember when in it was like Game three or four when Stam Van Gundy dropped that line about how like teams run because of their point guard, not because of
their coach. Again, I don't necessarily think that's true, but I do think there's some truth to it in the sense that, like I watched, I've watched as a guy who's rooted for Lebron a lot over the years, Like I've watched Lebron have success with mediocre coaches because of his ability as an on court presence to bring the accountability, to bring the intensity in the in the experience and all that kind of stuff and even the decision making.
I feel like trading Cat has a far greater potential to bring back useful players that fit within the identity of this team then getting rid of TIBs and just bringing in some new voice and seeing if that guy can fix all their problems. I think I do think that I do think that there needs to be like a sit down with Tis though in emphasize like and I would point out the obvious stuff with Delawn Wright and in Landra Shamant and be like, hey, like we have to kind of embrace the times and realize this
is a faster, more transition oriented game. We need to go deeper into our bench. All right, guys, that's all we have for tonight. On YouTube, We're heading over to playback again. That's playback dot tv slash Oops tonight. We'll be taking callers and questions and stuff for at least forty five minutes or so, so make sure you guys head over there. We'll see you guys in just a few minutes. And for the YouTube crowd, we will be back on Monday morning with our first bit of NBA
Finals preview content. We'll see you guys then. What's up guys? As always, I appreciate you for listening to and supporting OOPS tonight. They would actually be really helpful for us if you guys would take a second and leave a rating and a review. As always, I appreciate you guys supporting us, but if you could take a minute to do that, I'd really appreciate it.
The volume