Redefining Greatness: Can Recency Bias Skew our View of Legends?

Is a championship required for ultimate greatness? Is it simply about consistency, or are there more ingredients to the sauce? Can it be defined by team achievements, or does individual brilliance steal the spotlight? 

In this episode, we dive into a high-level conversation about recency bias and what it means to be “great.” As the term "greatness" gets tossed around more frequently in modern sports discourse, we untangle the threads of recency bias. Listen in as we debate the age-old challenge of comparing athletes from different eras and question what players fit into the conversation of all-time greats. Discover the diverse criteria for defining a Hall of Famer, and be ready to hear our picks. 

Jump right in, and let's redefine greatness.

[00:01 - 07:49] Exploring the Definition of Greatness with Hall of Famers Podcast: Examining the Impact of Recency Bias

• Greatness is hard to define, but consistency is key

• It's not just about team success, but individual performance over time

• The word greatness is sometimes overused in sports today

• Recency bias can lead to declaring someone an all-time great

[07:50 - 16:54] The Impact of Recency Bias on Defining Greatness Across Eras

• Recency bias is a significant factor in determining greatness in today's society

• ESPN has forced the concept of greatness and GOAT conversations on us

• Consider the impact someone had on their team, their peers, and their statistics 

[16:55 - 25:17] The Evolution of Sports: Is It Fair to Compare Athletes Across Generations

• Human beings tend to compare things across generations

• Conversations about greatness should be rooted in knowledge and research

• Taking into account the evolution of the game

[25:18 - 34:02] Identifying Modern-Day Greats

• Shohei Ohtani's performance is unique and deserves recognition

• Sustained excellence is required to be considered great

• Analyzing Patrick Mahomes, Aaron Rodgers, Tom Brady, and Bernard King

[34:03 - 42:15] Can You Be Considered Great Without Winning a Championship

• Greats acknowledge greatness, even if it is not recognized by a Hall of Fame

• Championships in team sports as the ultimate measure of greatness

• Examples of greats who never won championships

[42:16 - 50:39] The Criteria for Greatness: What It Takes to Be a Hall of Famer

• The criteria for greatness in different sports varies

• Hall of Fame should be more exclusive than it is now

• MVP criteria are different from judging someone's entire career

[50:40 - 1:00:23] Athletes that Personify Greatness

• Subjectivity of greatness in sports and other arts

• Examples of true greatness

Connect with Jarrett Bell

Connect with Robert Scoop Jackson

Quotes:

“The one thing I think stays constant with the definition of greatness… is consistency.” - Robert Scoop Jackson

“[Greatness], you know it when you’re in the presence of it.” - Robert Scoop Jackson

"But when you look at his production, his statistics, his impact on his team, and how he rated amongst his peers at that time, then you can make a great case to say that this guy was great and great in his era." - Jarrett Bell

"Human beings, we just do that. Who's the best dresser? Who's the best lawyer? As a society, as human beings, we're always gonna compare things cross-generationally. So, is it fair to do it in athletics?”  - Robert Scoop Jackson

"Greatness is sustained excellence… consistency. But sustained excellence at whatever you do, that makes you deserving of... an adjective of, he or she was great."  - C. Lamont Smith

"The beauty of sports and all arts: it’s that it’s so subjective.” -  Robert Scoop Jackson

—-----------------------

Follow HOFs On:

Instagram: @hofsthepodcast

Facebook: Hofs The Podcast

X: @hofsthepodcast

TIkTok: @hofsthepodcast

Youtube: @hofsthepodcast

Subscribe to HOFs The Podcast on:

Apple Podcasts

Spotify

IHeart Radio

Google Podcasts

Amazon Music

Visit: www.hofsthepodcast.net for more information and exclusive content.