HoP 493 Better Nature: The French Garden
How the French formal garden embodied both Cartesian philosophy and the political ideology of the French monarchy.

How the French formal garden embodied both Cartesian philosophy and the political ideology of the French monarchy.
How philosophy at the universities evolved in response to Cartesianism and the “new science.”
Arnauld’s attack on Malebranche’s theory of the “vision in God” leads to a nuanced debate over the nature of ideas.
What inspired the occasionalist theory embraced by the 17th century Cartesians? We find out from a leading specialist on the topic.
What led Malebranche to his notorious view that all bodily motions and thoughts are caused by God, with created things serving only as “occasions” for divine action?
We begin to explore Malebranche’s controversial development of Cartesian philosophy by looking at his theodicy.
Antoine Arnauld and Pierre Nicole update the study of logic to take account of the ideas of Descartes.
Antoine Arnauld combines Cartesian philosophy with Jansenism, one of the most controversial religious movements of the 17th century.
An interview on contemporary approaches to Pascal's Wager: where decision theory meets philosophy of religion.
Should we gamble on belief in God to have a chance at infinite reward?
Blaise Pascal was a pioneering scientist and deeply spiritual religious thinker; what united these two sides of his thought?
Why did Sébastian Basso and Pierre Gassendi think ancient atomism was the key to developing a new, modern science?
Gassendi’s path from skepticism to “baptized Epicureanism.”
So-called “libertines” like Mothe le Vayer revive ancient skepticism, provoking a backlash from Mersenne and Arnauld. Were they right to see the skeptics as anti-religious?
This episode explores René Descartes' profound interest in medicine, detailing his mechanistic understanding of the human body and how he integrated medical ideas into his philosophy. It examines the interplay between his rationalist theories and empirical observations, revealing a more nuanced, holistic approach to health than often attributed to him. The discussion also delves into the complex legacy of Cartesian dualism and its ongoing impact on modern medicine.
From comets to blood transfusions, embryology, and the debate over the pineal gland: Descartes’ impact on science, especially medicine.
Why Cartesianism appealed to women and became the inspiration for a pioneering feminist, Poullain de la Barre; and why Cartesianism was not the only option for women philosophers of the age.
Early Cartesians including Cordemoy and de La Forge develop but also challenge Descartes’ ideas, defending atomism and occasionalism.
We finish our look at Elisabeth of Bohemia and Descartes by talking to Ariane Schneck about their correspondence, focusing on the mind-body problem and the passions.
What do emotions reveal about the connection between mind and body? We turn to Descartes’ correspondence with Elisabeth and his On the Passions to find out.
A royal scholar and philosopher sets aside the tribulations of her family to debate Descartes over the relation between mind and body and the nature of happiness.
Descartes’ “provisional” morality and his views on free will and virtue.
Descartes’ Meditations caused controversy as soon as it appeared. In this episode we look at criticisms including the “Cartesian Circle,” and how Descartes answered them.
We're joined in this episode by a leading expert on one of the most famous works of philosophy ever written: Descartes' Meditations .
This episode explores Descartes's Cartesian dualism, focusing not on his claim of a separate soul (which was traditional) but on his radical move to explain all bodily functions, including sensation and imagination, mechanistically. It examines his arguments for distinguishing mind from body, his view of animals as complex machines without minds, and the enduring philosophical challenge of explaining how mind and body interact.
This episode delves into Descartes' skeptical method as presented in his Meditations, comparing it to the experience of revisiting familiar works like Hamlet. It explores Descartes' ambition to establish a foundation for science by rigorously doubting all beliefs, drawing on historical context and examining the role of God in overcoming skepticism. The discussion culminates in an analysis of the cogito argument and its implications for certainty.
For Descartes body is purely geometrical. So how does he understand features we can perceive, like color, and causation between bodies?
This episode explores René Descartes' evolving intellectual project, revealing how his public self-portrayal as a solitary genius diverged from his actual development. It highlights the significant, often unacknowledged, influence of figures like Isaac Beeckman on his scientific thought. The discussion also clarifies that Descartes viewed his famous metaphysics as a foundation for his primary interest in natural philosophy, a goal partially obscured due to the threat of persecution.
A look at the political and religious ferment that made up the historical context of philosophy in 17th century France and the Netherlands.
In this interview we learn more about the Republic of Letters: its importance for the history of ideas, it geographic breadth, who was involved, and the contributions of figures including Leibniz and Hartlib.