The Ham Radio two point zero audio podcast rip. Thank you for downloading and listening to this podcast. So basically what I do is I take all the audio clips out of my videos and upload them to spreaker, and then from there they're spread out to iTunes and SoundCloud and now Amazon Audible as well. But I want to welcome you and thank you for joining the audio section of
this series on Ham Radio. I hope you enjoy it, and I would appreciate you leaving us a comment or a review on whatever podcast service you're listening from. Thank you in seventy three. I hope you enjoy it. If he was honestly trying to provide information, was he right or wrong? The FCC has proposed another fine, this time the highest fine possible, the record
fine, the record setting fine, the highest dollar amount possible. The FCC has proposed against an amateur radio operator for interfering with fire suppression communications during a fire. This guy tried to cause interference to amateur radio communications. Look at this. A while back, I did a video about a proposal of a fine for a guy interfering with a net. Bad enough, and I'll put that video right there. I can't see my screen. The screen's backwards to
me. I'll put that video right there, so go check that out. That was a twenty four thousand dollars fine. Today's fine is a thirty four thousand dollars fine, a proposed thirty four thousand dollars fine. Now this article is actually from last year in July, so I don't know. I did a quick search. I didn't do a deep dive search. I did a quick search to find out if there was an update to this proposed fine. Couldn't find it. So anybody who has information on that put that below.
I'd like to know how this turned out. I found this article here on in Compliance magazine dot com and also on the AWL website, but no follow ups to it yet. The FCC has proposed a record fine against an amateur radio operator for interfering with radio communications supporting fire suppression efforts in a twenty twenty
one massive wildfire and Idaho National Forest. Okay, you gotta be a pretty sad individual to key up music during a net, during a daily debt, during just a regular check in how you do a net, You've got to be pretty bored. You got to be pretty bored and have absolutely nothing to do with your time at all to do that, but to interfere with an actual emergency communications. Wow. You know what. I shouldn't say what just popped in my head because it could be construed as violence against someone. I
don't. I don't call for violence against anybody, Okay, but if you see this guy on the street, I would just say boom. So you know one of those things, all right. According to a notice of apparent liability in al for forfeiture, Jason M. Frawley, it saddens me to
know that somebody with the name Jason would cause this kind of interference. Jason M. Frawley of Lewiston, Idaho, used his amateur handheld radio to intentionally interfere with radio communications directing fire suppression aircraft that we're combating the Johnson Fire, a thousand acre wildfire, and Elk River, Idaho. Frawley allegedly transmitted multiple times over two separate days on frequencies expressly allocated and authorized for government use,
causing harmful interference with the central immunity emergency communications. The FCC has proposed a monetary furnfeiture of thirty four thousand dollars, the maximum fine allowable incept cases. Frawley will be given an opportunity to respond in FCCS NAO before the final commission action is determined. But there's no follow up linked to from this article. So it sounds to me like I read that like he's using his Ham radio
to interfere with government commercial frequencies. He's not even on amateur radio frequencies. He's on commercial frequencies, government frequencies, interfering with What the heck man, what is wrong with you? Serious question? Serious question here? Okay, this is I say this from the bottom of my heart. What the heck is wrong with you freaking idiots? I really want to know what is wrong with you people? You want to interfere with a with a rescue operation.
If you're one of these idiot Hams who heads MCom for whatever reason, you're not interfering with him radio. He's on a freaking government commercial frequency. So why why why would you do that? I don't get it. I really don't. I really don't get it. This video is sponsored by Messi and Plomi Coacts. Messi, Plomi and Comacs from Italy makes some of the best
coacts and feedline for amateur radio and multiple applications. Today they're working on some new potaco acts that's brightly colored to put out in a field that people will still probably walk over anyway. But I have outfitted my entire shock and my entire mobile radio station with Messi Emplomi coacs and mobile radio station is not done
yet. You guys have seen videos on that, so I highly recommend going to gigaparts dot com and clicking on the link below using my discount code of case five HULDB to save a five percent discount on all Messi employ coax products, including their feedline, their connectors, their tools, their nifty little scissors that they have, and everything else that they have. Thank you Messi Emplomi for supporting this channel. There's a few more details on this FCC. I'm
sorry on this a double L article over here again. This was from last year twenty twenty two. Frawley holds an extra class amateur radio licensee whiskey Ouse Alpha seven CQ. That's a pretty cool call sign. You want to do
this kind of crap. The FCC alleged that in the n AL that on July seventeenth to twenty twenty one, using his amateur handheld probably transmitted five times, and on July twenty, July eighteenth, the next day transmitted three times on frequencies allocade and authorized for government use, apparently causing harmful interference with his apparently unlawful true. Apparently apparently they alleged he apparently keyed up eight times in
two days. Okay, all right, oh man, So this article goes on to say the na L includes details of the four Services complaint and the FCC's investigation. He argued that he was not trying to cause interference, but instead was transmitted to provide information to the firefighters. Okay, here's a quote from mister Frawley. At no time was I trying to disturb any other communications
on air traffic. I was honestly giving them information I had since I had been working on the butte since the early nineties, wrote Frawley in his October twenty twenty one response to a letter of inquiry from the FCC. The FCC, however, concluded that Frawley's admitted unauthorized transmissions on frequencies for which he did not have license had the potential to cause substantial harm to life and property.
The FCC held that Frawley, by his own admission, apparently will flee and repeatedly violated the Commission's rules where he made eight separate radio transmissions on a frequency for which he did not have a license. Again not on him radio frequencies. The FCC stated that unauthorized transmissions on frequencies licensed to public safety entities, using those frequencies to respond to emergency communication emergencies also constitutes a violation of Section
three three three of the Communications Act nineteen thirty four is ammended. FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosen Warsol added, you can't interfere with public safety communications full stop. So today we proposed the largest fine of its type for this interference to put fire suppression public safety at risk. Here's a news release from the FCC. Let's take this guy is well, I don't know this guy, mister Frawley, Whiskey Alpha six, Charlie Quebec, I don't I don't know him.
If he was honestly trying to provide information, was he right or wrong? Regardless with the FCC might say. If he was honestly trying to provide help to the firefighters and information to the firefighters, was he wrong? Yes or no. By the letter of the law, I would say that yes,
he is wrong because he's transmitting on frequencies for which he's not authorized. Now, some people are going to come along in this video and comment that, oh, well, in an emergency, you can use any form of communication that you want. True, you can, But an emergency defined by the FCC in terms of licensing requirements, means an immediate threat to your person or
property. Mister Frawley, Folly, Folly, Frawley, Frawley, According to the information we have from these two articles, his personal safety was not in question. He was trying to help firefighters fight a fire. So by the letter of the law, he was wrong. He didn't have rights to transmit on those frequencies, and he was not personally and immediately in danger of his
personal property from some sort of threat. But are we going to be such a society that we try to find people for helping me if he was truly intentionally trying to help, I don't know. I'd like to know what your thoughts are. I think I have mixed emotions on it. I think if it were me in that situation, I might have keyed up. And it
depends on what the subject matter of the radio transmission was. If he could hear the firefighters talking, and they were they were proposing questions or talking about something that was wrong, or saying they were looking for something, or they didn't know something, or they were without this piece of information that he had at the time, and he keyed up to give them that piece of information. I might have done that now that I've read this article, I probably
won't, but I might have done that. I mean, I said, hey, guys, I can see what you're talking about, and it's X y Z or I can answer that question for you here, here's the answer. Doesn't change the fact that on paper he was not licensed on those frequencies. But I want to know what you think. I want to know what you think about this article is this article is almost a year old, so and again, if anyone has any follow ups on it, I'd like to
see a follow up article on it. So put a comment. Blow seventy three