EP439. Geopolítica y Comercio Exterior - podcast episode cover

EP439. Geopolítica y Comercio Exterior

Mar 12, 20241 hr 11 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

¿Qué tal te caería una plática sobre "Geopolítica y Comercio exterior"?
En esta ocasión el Lic. Alejandro Alcalde, Director Americas Trade Compliance en FLEX nos propone este interesante Trueque para que tú también participes y enriquezcas tus conocimientos.

Transcript

For your seven billion dollars. You already called me twice that there are risks of ninety percent. They are SMEs that generate 80%. Give me twenty minutes of your time and I, in return, give you information on the most relevant issues in foreign trade, tax and customs with a human touch and let' s traik a podcast of TVs in Magas and Mexico Hello how good afternoons are welcome. Let' s barter as it is at a telese event

Magas and Mexico. Well, then, I' m very pleased. See you here, Alejandra, that you are making a rouquee with us, especially with a subject that, in truth, I mean, I heard it and I read it And the truth is that with so many changes that are happening both in Mexico and internationally. I believe that the geopolitics and foreign trade that

you are going to accompany us to this day is very important. So good also to welcome Dr Maximo Carvajal Doctor how you are welcome to barter to the view Antonio Carballida as well and to all those who connected both on social networks as today. I' m very happy to welcome you for a hello track. Thank you very much. Thank you, Daniela, thank you, Doctor, and good afternoon to all of you, and six months I was not with you. It' s really been a little bit of a complex year.

Last year was complicated, but this one started leaving anyway. But it ' s always a privilege. He wants to be with you, sharing information and also listening to experiences from others. Thank you so much, Alexy. Good to give you the floor. I would like to read your face and, above all, thank you because your experience, the truth, brings us a lot and we are very happy that you connect with us to make an

an here. Alejandro Mayor is a graduate of the technical market of the Instituto Tecnológico de Chihuahua, specializing in business English from the TEC of Monterrey and Financial Law Studies from the Autonomous University of Chihuahua and High Management from the Es Banking

and Commercial School. Director of DK Compañas para la Región de Américas at Flex Manufacture, responsible for managing business compliance program for Canada, Mexico Costa Rica, Brazil and with special focus on where in the United States, including export control. TRAK Oflscience' s ISA program has more than twenty years of experience in

international regulatory compliance, enforcement, customs and logistics. He has worked in manufacturing companies such as Emerson Electric, Vision Automotive and Fort Motors, foreign trade services and consultancy companies such as Jippy Morganches Pastera who now s Livingstone and logistics companies Rider Systems and bax Global Shenker, mainly in Mexico, the United States and

Latin America. He has collaborated with some associations of maquiladoras and exporters as part of the customs committees of Chihuahua, Nuevo León, Reinosa and Ciudad parez and is currently a member of the Trader Compliance Committee of work cooplass Station Capítulo México and is also a member of the Exports and Operation Committee as part of the

internal competition indes Pressosstation in the California Valley of u of Silicon Valley. Well, Alejandro, thank you so much for joining us today and I' ll leave you well and I' ll give you the Community to do a trick. Thank you. Thank you, everyone, for I am going to you. I prepared for you today an issue that, as it has lately been very much in our minds for everything we have lived through perhaps since two thousand and eighteen, may be when the trade war between the United States and China

began. And for some who were there, they have been more surprising, because the whole issue of Pakistan and all the crises we have been dealing with. But lately, more so with the issue of Ukraine' s war with Russia and it term, which, in particular, I find very interesting and very relevant, which is geopolitics. Let me share with you here the material we prepare. Well, well, look at geopolitics, it' s not the opposite. Whatever we might think. It' s not a new term.

Geopolitics is even a discipline and a school of a kind of doctrine that, for some scholars of the subject, has its origins from one thousand eight hundred to the end of one thousand eight hundred of the nineteenth century, when this theme of the industrial revolution began to be given and mass or serial production

began to expand. For others it has to do with the doctrines of trusted political scientists early in the 20th century, although since more detail and more popularized, it was formalized following the great depression of one thousand nine hundred and thirty and, obviously, it had its boiling or its highest point during the Second World War. There are records that geopolitics as such, as it was used both by the Nazis, the Nazi Party, and by the allied countries,

both to give perception and this sort of good against bad. I am right, and the others are not And obviously, so, everything that flourished after World War II, all that whole period of the famous Cold War that the seventies where he left were made two branches of geopolitics than the school to the critical geopolitics, this by an English who is called Cost Island and the French

School of Peter Taylor East, who basically established the following. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. It dealt as data, as historical studies to know a country, a

region, to establish what its political situation is, what its temes are, its demographic situations and for and to understand a little the international environment or how countries and regions relate to each other. It' s about having historical data

on how populations are managed. The issue of geopolitics related to international conflicts, not to wars, to crises, comes to our mind a great deal, but it has also been achieved in peace rooms on political issues, because in the midst of all this the General Council of the United Nations was born. Then it is fortunate to agree on all and to manage the power to lead

the population or humanity to a good destiny. Logically, obviously, we are going to see in this talk that there are different positions and they obey several

specific points. So, then, it has its core point in regional and situational analysis for what geopolitics is important in international trade, because, as we well mentioned, it is to understand them even among historical antecedents of a region, of a region where, where we go to buy goods, where we go to do business, where we go to sell products, It helps us identify risks, risks in the sense that whether we want to buy inputs or

sell products in countries that understand a little more the regime that reigns, not or that governs that country or that region, the limitations, uses and customs, the different customs regulations, commercial taxes that have and will make trade easier

or more difficult for us. On the other hand, it also helps us to know more potentials, benefits or incentives that exist with another region, namely foreign direct promotion programs, free trade agreements, if they are allied or friendly countries, or a region where we are left to offer a service, sell a product, establish a business relationship or of any kind that we have benefits

from being nationals of any country. Namely the North American region, the European region, the European Community and, last but not least, it helps us to establish business controls, whether for sale or for purchase, controls on the entry and exit of goods, checks on the payment of taxes, checks on regulations. Basically in geopolitics it goes hand in hand with international trade and that ' s where I found myself on a very good page that I recommend you

to call the world order. Along with this sheet that will help us greatly to explain and develop this conference or this talk today, And it is, therefore, the whole world map and the routes of maritime trade, mainly marine, because, therefore, the most last trade is the one that plays the

world. We have different references here, such as different regions. If you look at it, there' s the map of the world and it' s kind of cool, but here it is in the region of America, which is Mexico, Panama Canal, North America, South America and, to understand a little bit, it' s segmented in what are the areas that produce raw materials, what are the areas where manufactures are produced and what are the target or consumer areas and what are the main trade routes. If we

can see anything in the world. There are seven very strategic commodity control points, which is where it basically crosses all world trade. We' re starting with the Asia region. If you look at the Asia region, we have

manufacturing areas, all that is China, all that is Taiwan. Here the goods are produced and we have the first port of departure through the Strait of Malacca that to Singapore, one of the main financial points of the world with the rest of Asia down, as comes this route that connects with the stress

of Hormus, which is precisely the door to the Middle East. Here' s Dubai, and here' s Sakala and we get to the Marvec Strait and where the Suez Canal is. We all remember the Suez Canal, because a year and a half ago, because we were the East boat that ran

aground and totally collapsed the trade in that region of the world. Here it is because it is precisely the entry into the lower part of Europe and the exit through the estuary of Gibraltar to the northern part of Africa, and which carries many of the supplies or components of the consumer areas that are basically in Europe, continue through another port, to New York, which is where the

other large consumer region is. And so simply following on this side, because it goes through all points, collecting in the different ports the components and traveling all over the Pacific Ocean towards America, which has basically three main points. An alternate point in Alaska, Vancouver, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Macerillo de Lázaro Cárden. This is where the goods arrive, either for consumption or

for manufacturing. These in turn, because they leave following the route of the ships, because to the Canal Cama Panama, In the Panama Canal, because here they leave by boat. If they are fixed, it is cyclical and if they are fixed, it is distributed by region and economic power is distributed in regions. To this day, for everyone has known that the Panama Canal is administered by the United States, which is up to two thousand twenty-

one and we will see that this will change. This is where the consumers of the planet or Europe and these regions, which are producer economies, are concentrated, because they are the ones that their economic map has been changing, has been improving, their income, their middle class has been rising and eventually, because they will have a share of consumption cases like India, for example, they also tend to be producing areas of raw materials and manufactures, potentially

in consumer areas. So, if we see, we go to power or political regimes. We can see, then, that we have very special regimes with the United States and apart, we have Asia, we have the Middle East, and that makes those that obviously, the nations compete with each other, for having, therefore, a greater participation and a greater control of the areas where the goods are produced. This could be said to be the heart

of geopolitics. Here are many of the answers to the questions and the topics that we are going to go. Well, then you don' t lose

sight of this foil. Over the last one hundred and fifty years, we will realize that in the relationship of economic conflicts, armed conflicts, industrial development and around regulation, many things have happened, for example, on the side of this global and regional economic crisis, Without if we can see compensating with the first, which was the recession of the post- World War I in nineteen hundred and seventeen, every ten years we have had a regional or global

crisis that has contracted the gross domestic product or the economy in several digits very serious cases, like what happened after the great depression seventeen percent of the GDP or after the Second World War there was fifteen percent of the GDP and then in the Cold War, then almost one percent. But during the 1970s and 1990s we were right in my view that a political crisis, at least a

regional economic crisis, at the rate of every five years. Not the tequila crisis or the tequila effect, the effict zamba in Brazil, the tango effect in Argentina, where the countries occasionally went bankrupt, not in impossibility of making their payments and their commitments to the fund, like the international state, to

the East countries that have to pital to lend. And the last, because it is the one that we are still living, which is the pandemic of covid and the recession that we come from that, although on a global level, according to this OLSD and according to the whole international, the contraction was five point, three percent later we will see what it is, because it

is a programming of all the countries in Latin America. It is estimated that there are places like Venezuela, where it was a contraction of more than twenty percent of the economy, and not only that is five percent of the volumes of the economy today, which are very different from the volumes of billions that were handled 150 years or 50 years ago. Then we have never stopped experiencing

a crisis in any region. On the other hand, armed conflicts have also been a matter of heart and every ten twenty years we have had one. If we take the same reference beginning of the twentieth century in, because we started with the Mexican revolution in America, while in Europe, because there was the Russian civil war, while in Africa there were still issues of slavery and in Asia, because we still had issues there of the Asian and Oceania war

and the Chinese civil war. Every ten years there has been a conflict, every ten years there have been adjustments. Every ten years, there have been issues of political crises that ultimately result in economic crises. An encouraging fact is that, after all these crises, there has been a series of reforms. Organizations have been established and established, as they have laid the foundations for what

they call the new world order. Much is said to be the case that after the first great depression the International Monetary Fund was born, the dollar was introduced as a single currency of exchange and the World Bank was created for what, to regulate the economy, to regulate prices, to regulate certain international economic measures, according to what was needed at that time and has been operating until a few years ago after the Second World War, because the UMC was created

or before GAT was created the OCTE or the SD the World Customs Organization in one thousand nine hundred fifty- two, and this was instrumented the gross domestic product as an index to measure the economy of this one in the decade of the seventies and the eighties, since the International Augmentary Fund is still to be

forgiven. The World Economic Forum and the UCTED were developed and established and then more and more, at the beginning of the year two thousand, with the problems and with the crisis that we had of the twin towers and all the security crises in carnal supply, as they gave the entrance towards, towards, towards, towards, the business antism Gremqualition, which is the world coalition of trade to the East, to the authorized economic operator first in Europe and Singapore,

and to the coalition of Abani and anti- terrorism trade in the United States, or the City Pat, which created a whole supply meat security industry. On the other hand, since the mid- 18th century, this has been evolving and growing. The industry became very colliding. We are in the Fifth Industrial Revolution, where we started from the mid- 1800s with mechanization generating hydraulic energy, energy, steam, serial production, mass production. In the

19th century, the use of power. Then, in the 21st century, computer automation, manufacturing made its bullion. And today, because we come from the first ten fifteen years of the 21st century, to hybrid systems, to hybrid systems, to the digital world. And now we are in big data, we are in intelligence, artificial machine learning, that we are, as I say to you, entering the fifth industrial revolution. All these things happened

in the last one hundred and five thirty years. So, everything, in the middle of all this, because there is the political management, the geopolitical environment, is called ppolódico, because, because it is happening all, all countries and then gives us, gives us the pattern to a new term or acronym that was coined during the Second and after the Second World War, the decade of the seventies, And this was already used in a generalized way in

the business world in the nineties, which is the buca or bica environment in Spanish, that speaks of planning and to this to implement strategies in a volatile environment where things are changing, which today serves as a strategy, perhaps not tomorrow or in the following months. Not because it changes the whole environment. And this is uncertainty, because you can' t predict things with that attitude, because we don' t know exactly what' s going to happen.

The environment is complex, because there are many, many dependencies, many forces. The issue of cause and effect is complicated and ambiguous. We do not live in an ambiguous environment, in that we do not know what the real whole is and what it is and what the mouth or the bica is completely reliable, as it is today part of our reality. There is not even

a world movement dedicated to studying futurism and studying bookup. There are some universities that study this phenomenon or this acronym, because as matter and basically it is handled in that how to predict, how to have the best strategy with everything

and against what it is that we live. We were not prepared for a pandemic, No one was prepared to live what we lived, What left us, for example, the pandemic of covid because it was contraction of more than two digits or two little children in this one in Latin America, a silence

through the economy. Seven point next percent. It seems to me how Venezuela fell the economy thirty percent, Peru twelve percent, Argentina ten percent to Mexico, as it was of those that this less bad was And we almost reached the two digits. There are a number of major efforts being made by the

World Bank to rebuild the economy. It passed on four pillars. First, nothing saves lives, not putting as much funding as possible into the health issue, and then, then, I try to protect the poor and vulnerable and lay the foundation for sustained growth. On the basis that, then, on the basis of this, we protect the environment, protect health, protect life and, therefore, see how we are rebuilding and how we are doing short, medium and long- term goals. The World Bank is estimated to have

invested about$ 750 billion. Or the analysis they have to sort out what the pandemic left us in broad terms, numbers plus numbers less, no, and as we started, as we started the year two thousand twenty- three, because it was the following way, I think it was based on what we have seen and what we have analyzed in the previous prints. Perhaps this year is when we start with more crises and more adversities in all regions of

the planet. Why, because the United States was facing the abyss, is facing the enormous risk of falling into recession that demand for products will fall. There is a crisis of consumer confidence. There' s no money. And so, originally, as a region like the United States, they consume and stop consuming, because for all the uncertainty and the risk of recession, obviously, they make all the markets laugh. Europe, on the other hand,

is also suffering the same. Europe has no money, but it has a huge amount of social problems because of an uncontrolled migration that is taking place, especially from people coming from Africa and other countries. There is a rather complex situation on social issues, on administration issues, on government issues in Latin America, because obviously we have a sort of very controversial political leaders, very populists, who are called either, loaded into the center ideology of the left,

because they seek only immediacy. They don' t have a political program, a strategy. And, obviously, because in situations like these it becomes complicated, there is an atmosphere of tremendous polarization throughout the region and that, therefore, creates a lot of uncertainty on the part of investors in countries that have

the capital to invest. As the Latin American region manufactures and produces inputs or consumer products, as demand declines and as there is a crisis of reliability, because it does not have an environment with legal certainty, because it is beginning to complicate in Asia, in this, in the eastern part of Europe, because also the main problem, because it is the invasion of Russia to Ukraine and the whole food crisis and the humanitarian crisis that resulted from this, the

mass migration of all the peoples that are around, the humanitarian crisis that comes together, therefore, with the health crisis of the covid that the covid has not ended up leaving or that if the global aviation of health of each comes at the end of the pandemic, we know that there have been variations of

concern. Chile, on the other hand, because it is coming out of bar situations number one, because it is all that it has stopped selling since it is a country that produces inputs and raw materials and has been standing for two or three years, because it has stopped products. That lockup they took

as a strategy, because it affected them too much. On the other hand, because they are immersed in one in a trade war with the United States and facing all these trade sanctions imposed by the President trumpo in two thousand eighteen, because they have been diminishing their economy and have terrible debt problems. Its population grew in purchasing power economy, came into debt, came acquiring a certain lifestyle because there was a flow of sales. And then all of a sudden

all this stopped and now they have other kinds of problems. So, I think it' s been a long time since the world started it. A year like the one we started and like the one we are going through lately i obviously, the positions of power, the political positions, the positions of competition, for the territory, for the inputs, for the supply, for

the control of goods is radicalized and this becomes more complex. Everything does not make the appearance, good or at least in our vocabulary, this day to day, global international sanctions. We, I think, were listening to rare international sanctions. For back in the seventies, in whom we already are of

a middle age. Yes, that' s the 80' s to that time when there was a boycotta to the Olympics in Moscow, Well, yes to that as we saw that there was talk about the energy crisis in the 1970s and then in the 1980s because the whole issue of terrorism and sanctions to countries. There are no diplomatic sanctions that occur when two countries focus on conflict and expel diplomats from it so that they do not visit, not and so

that they do not have this communication. There are no economic sanctions, which are the ones we are dealing with, which we are engaged in foreign trade

customs. Logistics, because we have had more to see for the sanctions that have imposed, because this, the following trump to Chinese products what you call it with the rates of section three hundred one of the Office of Trade Representation or the Secretariat of Economy of the United States East and that in some way has benefited us for being a manufacturing country and that many of the projects and processes have been running from China to America and more specifically to Mexico, because

to use platforms like the USMC. And we are all the ones who are a little closer to that the military songs, because they are the interventions. What happened with Russia and Ukraine sports sanctions Russia is a clear example. It is and later we will see a case as soon as the invasion of Russia Ukraine took place, the International Automobile Federation sanctioned Russia the Formula One Grand Prix. It' s canceled. There was a runner and no more cepin running

in a squire' s office. FIFA also took it out of there, because it also sanctioned the International Football Federation of Russia and the gymnastics Federation and because they are practically isolated from all competition and environmental sanctions, because they are the ones that there are economic measures due to bad environmental practices. We haven ' t seen much of them, but they' re probably the ones that

will come when we have more complex effects on climate change issues. There is a regulation that passed the previous year, which is the CYBOOM or the coal relationship, which speaks of the green tax that the European Community is imposing on

its imports. It is beginning with the steel industry, with concrete for very specific coditis, but it is what comes with this agenda that Europe has of making emissions, of reducing pollution, because it is going to start issuing sanctions to those countries that do not have a clean energy policy that they call it then. That' s what we' re going to meet to see.

And so, the sanctions how they work, because they have several four items and four sections that are who is the end user of the goods or the products, who they are, what use these goods will be given to those products and is to manufacture goods that are going to be used in which industry, armament, government, recreation, medicine, etc, and what are the

final destination. Whether we have a case like that of us in Mexico, we bring components or goods from other regions, well we invoice products and forward them to other countries through the maquila program. The international regulations that exist. These are the four quadrants on which international sanctions are established, mainly who is exposed or what they are applying to us, mainly we, because they are those of the United States Government, through the Department of State, the Department

of Commerce and the Bureau of Industry and Security. They have different categories, different theories of controls, depending on the type of goods and destination that it is, whether they are usable or used in systems or applications of software technologies for military purposes or those that are called dual use, also that they can be used at best in producing a simple drill, but they can also be used to produce a chemical cannon, which can be used for use of detergents,

but they are drug procursors and all this subject that are of military control, but which also has a commercial use and export licenses for mainly controlled items right now. We' ll see a little bit more detail with what' s going on with the theme of semiconductors, the theme of memories, the theme of chips. All of these have sanctions on countries, specifically China,

and have movement or export and import controls. Well, let' s go to the first case, to the case to understand a little more why it ' s important to understand geopolitics in international business. I brought this case because it' s very good. It is very current and has to do with player Luis Chávez. Luis Charvez, remember that kick that the Mexican team put in the Arabian section of the World Cup. How about one of the prettiest goals, that goal he scored from outside the area. And that' s

where this player is from, because they came up with their credentials. He really played, he has played in the gongkaf in two World Cups and national selection and his dream was to play in Europe after the World Cup tasting as there were several clubs interested by him for his card. The Pachuca club, which is where he was playing for, is not interested in making a meaningful

transaction for them. And that' s where the most money was proposed for this player was the dynamo from Moscow, Moscow, that is, from Russia. What was the problem here, well well, we know the card of this player or the value of the Charter of Player Rights. According to Transfermarket, it is the page where you can see all the information of the players

of the world. The Charter is assessed at EUR 6 5 million. The transaction and sale between Club Pachuca and Dynamo Moscow was a transaction of eight million euros to live in. In which FIFA suspended Russia, as we have said, all clubs in Russia and everyone, the entire federation from playing and from having any worldwide interaction of competitions. UEFA, which is the European Football Federation,

also did the same. Moreover, at the financial level, SWIFT, which is the system that facilitates global transactions between banks, because it blocked all banks with after and then we had a problem, that we had a player who was intended by a Russian club to get his services. He made a rather interesting economic proposal to the Pachuca club for eight million euros. He fulfilled all the expectations and dreams of a 27- year- old player who wanted

to go out into the world to play Europe. But it could not be done. It could not be done because today the Russian League, because it is a league that is isolated and disconnected from the world, cannot play in official competitions, cannot play with other countries financially. We were faced with the dilemma that how those eight million euros were paid to the Mexican club. And

this is what happened. How they did it, how the capital flows took place, Well we have three players here, we have a country that sells, the United States, and a country that buys, Russia. We have an intermediary who is Venezuela. So what happened, because first of all, the player himself, my Chávez, paid his own contract termination clause, paid five million pesos to Pachuca to be considered free people and then he could negotiate

his letter and his rights with any club. Then negotiations were established to reach the sale agreement to the player. And what had to be done was that

Pachuca had to establish a commercial relationship with a bank in Venezuela. He opened an account, making a good account so that after we already assumed that Russia had no issues in making a transfer with a bank in Venezuelas, they made all the arrangements, all the ct that they call him and in this way he transferred the eight million euros to the Pachuca club in his Venezuela account. Then, after the transaction has been confirmed, the Pachuca club withdrew the funds

to its bank account in Mexico. This tertiaryization. And all this made it possible for Luis Charvez, because he finally fulfilled his dreams, to go out and play European football. And to this day, the Pachuca club, as it has walked this process, is also offering from its other club, which is the luxury Pachuca, which is the lion, is already selling another player

to another Russian club. It is the first time in the history of football that a Mexican player goes out to Russia and, obviously at the most appropriate moment through a war, now what potential risks and regulatory commitments there are for the two involved in this, mainly for Club Pachuca, because in the sale of this player is considered an export. Pachuca, as an organization, as a sports group, already has a registered export of a sale to Russia in

its records. If for any reason, Club Pachuca becomes a subsidiary, a subsidiary, an association in another country that has Russia sanctioned, you call the United States, England, Spain, can at any time be questioned or even punished for having done business with a country that is blocked, that is seized,

that is sanctioned? This can get the club into a complication. Financial transaction, of the exchange of capital between a bank of Mexico and a bank of Venezuela seemed to start day, because it had no issue, because there is no, there is no sanction, there is no embargo. There are open trade relations between Mexico and Venezuela, but again we tend to do the same to other countries or to FIFA itself. This can be considered a relationship,

a risk transaction. Why. Because the European Community, the international community, the international banking system of the West, does not regulate transactions and the exchange of capital between a country and the Bank of Venezuela. Moreover, the Bank of Venezuela is well aware that banks have some degree of control by the

Government of Venezuela and is thus an example. The United States today does not have a total embargo on Venezuela. They have partial barriers and precisely one of the points of concern or audit points is that transactions that are made between individuals or entities of Venezuela, since they are not linked to the government. This could be an important issue for the Pachuca club and, as I told you,

it could be questioned by the geó for several things. It is making it easier for a league to be active in a league that is sanctioned,

a league that is not disaffiliated, but is sanctioned and punished. Obviously, we think that the Lu Pachuca or the Pachuca Group, because they have their lawyers have so much foreign trade and they have people who advised them very well to make this transaction for Luis Chávez, Para bliz Chávez, because, first of all, he will lose, at the best of those sporting moments, the opportunity, because to have a forum, he will go to a league

sanctioned by FIFA, by UEFA and that he will go to a local league where there will be no records of his performance, of his goals, of his assists, of what he does. He may well not be summoned to play with the Mexican Football Team, although there are no rules, there are

no laws, there is nothing to prohibit him. Well, certainly, again speaking of geopolitics and talking about lately the interaction between the LMS and the Mexican Football Federation, we have just gone through an interleague tournament and we are facing the doors of a forthcoming Naftan World Cup, where it will be played in Canada, the United States and Mexico, because the fact that a selected player of yours is playing in Russia, since the truth can affect the player what

other things they can see. It' s a great idea that it doesn ' t suit the game system To get back, it' s complicated its return because now, Russia would have to sell it to Mexico and all this and it doesn' t adapt the life system. So, we really live in an environment of certain freedoms, in a certain way of living, here in the West and then he went against his family there. So this is not good for geopolitics. For this purpose it is useful to study the environments,

to analyze the risks and to make decisions based on them. I believe that this is an example that makes it easy for all of us to understand and to what extent considerations can come to a commercial transaction. I mean, it' s not about using the player here as a commodity. It' s about selling a service and it really caught my attention. I followed the case a lot and when I was loving this talk, I think it made

it easy for me to illustrate it. Now we' re talking a little bit about payment financial systems and we haven' t heard much about Briggs versus SWIFT. Good him. The Briggs comes from the year of nineteen hundred and nine where the acceding countries or the countries not one hundred percent aligned to those to the seven. A declaration was made to be created as in one with an environment of a new, more equitable world order, to remove it in

a few words, for protectionism, or to take away supremacy. And that and that all power and all economic and all capitals are concentrated in just seven countries, that there is a more felt, fairer distribution, that there is a more humanistic approach and that there is a more social approach. And so, in a way, what we know is the eternal struggle between left and

right, between camp lifeism and socialism. Not what they represent, because Briggs, although in the number of countries and the number of nations they exceed the United States, the European Unity and the Group of the G seven, because in reality they represent just twenty- five two hundred of the pipe of the world economy and this forty- two percent of the population. This has changed. Obviously, and as I was telling you, economies like India, for

example, have been growing enormously. South Africa has been growing tremendously. This one in Brazil, because it has quite a lot of problems, but it is a strong country in Latin America and can potentially raise the income of its middle class, purchasing power to grow its economy. And this, then, can start to balance things a little bit. It' s going to replace

SWIFT to Briggs to SWIFT probably not. What I studied from these two positions is that it can economically benefit the world, because there may be several interbank payment systems and not just one, like what just happened with the example we saw of the football player, if we had two open payment systems and were working in some normality and in one of the polarized environments we live in.

For Mexico, which is a mediating country, is that we have always gone to a country that we do not charge ourselves to one side, to the other side of the balance, that we are an open country. It would be easier to have access to the two payment systems and to transact this trade with the two regions countries such as Switzerland as well and other countries that have not decided to take a physical stance. It can be a real posture,

it can be a benefit. But today, as Briggs is a reality, more countries will be able to join, perhaps it will be able to increase this participation in the pit Definitely, taking into account two things, the world ' s great consumers are in crisis. Europe has been tremendously affected by Russia ' s war with Ukraine Russia. Ukraine was therefore the number one supplier of minerals, grains and some other foods in Europe. Russia is therefore the number

one supplier of natural gas throughout Europe. And, as I was saying, European countries are facing severe humanitarian and social crises. I was just reading that, for example, Sweden has terrible crime problems, ulterior social problems all over migration and by all gangs and every time Sweden, as it has been one

of the most open countries to migration. Spain has problems, France, also in England and the United States, because let' s not say the United States with the security problems that the drug crisis has lately, with the canile of some potential recession. This can definitely balance or move completely. The map that we, who had seen at the beginning, has no other important theme, which is the war of the semiconductors and between the boys. Why shouldn

' t we worry. Well, look at a report that Mackenzie made in two thousand twenty- two. He made projections that by the year two thousand thirty the market of microchips or semiconductors will be evaluated in a billion dollars, that is, billions of dollars, which potentially means this beyond all the electronics that we can think bring a memory. Today, everything has memory, it has a semiconductor chip. The car shortage crisis came precisely because today the autros

are very electrified. Our phones have chips, our computers. Our whole life as we become smarter and more digital, because it has a chip, a semiconductor, a memory and an integrated circuit that facilitates, since all this. And there is a very but very important issue and I think it is the

central part of all of this. The development of artificial intelligent, military systems, state- of- the- art satellite systems, aircraft, all have to do with chips and obviously, who wins the chip production market, microchips,

semiconductors will own the world. For China, chip manufacturing is extremely complex, because while they have cheap labor, although they do have them, many of the raw materials developments depend on others, mainly Japan and mainly Holland, the United States, from company to the United States, from capital to produce, as all that technology. And there' s another important issue, which

is silicon, not silicon. Those countries that have silicon and that have lithium and that have other components, because they are going to have capital there invested for something. The President of López Obrador made the decree that nationalize lithium and other components, because this is going to be the basis of the new wars we have. This is going to be the basis of geopolitics and, obviously, as we saw very much at the beginning of our discussion on this,

this map is the heart of geopolitics. Until a few months ago, routes began in Asia and there they moved to certain regions such as Oceania, such as the Middle East, such as Europe, North Africa, Central America, South America. But what everyone is looking for is, obviously, more and more territory, more and more power to dominate the other. That' s geopolitics. And that is, therefore, the world that we have had to live, especially to those who are on these issues of customs, of international

trade, of foreign trade, of three complayans of logistics. It is fascinating to understand this, to understand what is happening outside, because, because it is already coming to us in the immediate environment in Mexico, which happened two weeks ago, on the 16th of August. The government of Mexico, because it took out three decrees there well, made a change to the lige to adjust the import rates the ones cups that are to zero the sweats Tomentis five

percent. He modified the decree process this. So why, precisely, to ensure that all the entry of goods from a country with which we do not

have a trade treaty, because a trade barrier is placed on it? Interestingly, two days later, the user or the iust Representative Office or the Secretariat of Economy in the United States made a publication congratulating or welcoming or expressing its satisfaction with the measures that the Government is doing to control mainly this, the entry of plastic steel and some other key components of this country that do not

have free trade agreements, which is, therefore, a deglobalization and a regionalization, I mean practically what it would like to do is to break this line or turn it into a dotted line like this, so that these hoops or these points of control of goods, because they become two or three, not so that there is only one with the North American bloc, another with the Americas and another with Europe and another with Asia. It is very interesting what

is happening and so far my intervention of this day. I hope you' re interested in this conversation or this conversation. I say I' m passionate about all these issues out there are here my Linkedin and x networks. Now, if you want to talk to me, I' ll exchange information, because you' ll have your orders. Here was a comment, I tell the excellent truth extra nadia talk and here was a song comment. Why the

map is like that. It' s not like I wasn' t in the way No, it' s because it' s kind of seen from above. It' s not like we saw it from above and identified how the world had been designed as a circle or a perfect cycle, where everyone had their roles in this game very well defined. Who they were, Who they were who produced the components, who manufactured them, who distributed them and who consumed them. That had been the world a few years ago. Right

now, because all this is changing. Hey Alexia here tell me to have a ball between the future and your experience and especially how these transnational corporations are contemplating it, how they' re going to double, what' s going to happen to the dola, and that' s right, America is yielding this power how we' re looking at it as business from international companies. Well, there are opinions of all kinds, studies of all kinds analysis and

all kinds. There are since the most catastrophic ones that say what the end of capitalism is, which is the end of the dollar, that just as after the Second World War the supremacy of the dollar and capitalism was established, because now the world has changed and the dollar can potentially end and other means

of change are put in place. There was much talk of cryptocurrencies that if the joan or if the Brigs are now going to implement a single coin and my opinion, very personal and I can be wrong, is that rather this is going to be opened, rather in places that we have only one coin, maybe we have three or four and we are going to have to get

used to living together. It is not going to balance power and if it would be, obviously, the happy world to get there, because it will not be easy and it will have to get many complicated and complex situations, because everyone will be defending their terrain and power, as it says also go here and that they are mentioning it right now, it is what will happen with these countries that are already negotiating in Chinese currency, because forgiveness with those

who are already negotiating with Chinese currency. I don' t have many examples like that at the hands of companies that are negotiating. But to this day, as we know it, because the dollar is still the international currency of exchange, I do not have many examples. I' m telling you this example of a footballer. It came to me very well because or because the complexity and the obstacles that are going to begin are precise. Let' s

start seeing that we' re engaged in international trade. Hey this alexi also see how you' re going the future with super weight and with the changes we' re having in Mexico as well. What I' ve read about super weight is that it' s one is a consequence of several factors.

Obviously, the issue of neal shorring has appreciated the currency because, within all this geopolitical, geo- economic re- accommodation, mainly Western companies or companies have wanted to take their production out of China and have passed it to other markets. Yet, fortunately, for us our reference is the United States. This, then, results in many companies coming and still appetizing to the US market. In the United States, the United States has been doing a lot

of work inside. They have right now, the IRA called or the Teamflation Reduction Active is basically a series of incentives that give everyone who invests in energy and give money back to the companies, to the people they buy cars from. You see that initially this law signed by the President of Baden, said that those Americans who bought electric cars were going to be returned money in their

tax declarations. Fortunately, and that' s where the U S canal government got alive, and they went on to wade disputes and modify this law to

be built cars in the North American region. And it was one of the main reasons why Teslab decided to come and put his plant here, that effect of bringing more chapter and that we are attractive, not because of the issue of public administration, not because of the issue of security, for many issues that, while they are painful, is what has been appreciating the weight of China, as it has come down in its economy and the part that the

dollar has also been weakening. However, one of the points of risk that I saw quite important, was the pressure points that the Mexican economy has, because of so much legal uncertainty, for the electoral year and, above all, for the indexes in relationaries. That could potentially play us the other way around and in the next few months volatility, because we would happen what each sexenia a time plan that runs out of the sexenium and the weight comes down.

I hope it doesn' t happen. But, because what I was reading about this topic and to close with the questions says good. Obviously, there are many congratulations and we are also asked here whether it is enough in Mersharring to have international competitiveness, that is, that there is also a need for more research and technological development and to become a manufacturing country. Yeah, we definitely do, and, on the other hand, we need you as

a legal man. Today, there seems to be a fan of ending simex companies and what we are seeing, for example, that the aeronautics law of reducing the number of flights at Mexico City airport, the militarization of customs, there are many things that, while not bad and are good ideas. I mean, the NAM seems to be a copy paste of the Home plan Security. Boa' s new security profile is a faithful copy of the CITPATI security profile. They are necessary things, but execution has not been the best,

the best and the most accepted. So, if you need a lot of things to take advantage of this moment, listen, I said at the last but well, how do you see the next US elections for Latin America and they' re going to be transcendent, just as much polarization. We' re already seeing it. There is not a very strong candidate who is President Trump. There is an adsverse social and economic scenario for those living in the

United States. There is a lot of discontent and then I was also reading an article that became quite interesting to me that President Trump promised to end the war in Russia Ukraine, and I was seeing that they are different points of view. For the President of Biden, the enemy is Russia, for the President of Trumpe the enemy China. And in the middle of all that, because who we' re good for Trump to be, because maybe Mexico certainly did very well with the President. We don' t know, but they

' re going to be transcendent and whatever happens in America. Thank you very much, Alexy. Well, right now. Now the microphone for the panelists if you want to make a comment Doctor. Thank you, Daniela. Congratulations Alejandro, really very interesting your talk and very well decorated with your slides. That map, although it looks strange, but gives us precisely the sense in the maritime traffic where the ports are and how the maritime lines that are above

all moving, carrying out international trade, are moving. I believe that the issue is a fundamental issue in order to understand international trade well, not more in our trade, but in trade around the world. And you' ve done it, because it' s really extraordinary. I was thinking about it. When you spoke of Panama, I remembered the Torrijos Carter Treaty, which gave Panama total absolute control over the canal from nine hundred and ninety- nine.

And the reference to what led me to think is that, because you said something historically, geopolitics has served us, and what I reflected is that the current government would have had, would have applied the historical experience we had with that stretch of the isthmus of Teguantepec, of course, in which in the time of Porfirio Díaz, of course that corridor opened and worked. It worked well for a good number of years with profits for our country. But

when the Panama Canal arises, this because our traffics are falling apart. We are trying to do that when, geopolitically, exclusive economic zones were more acceptable. It' s a very personal opinion. Of course, exclusive economic zones such as China, which gave it a great rise shen Chen, which was a fishing village of five thousand inhabitants, now has several million people and has

the most important industrial and manufacturing companies. Why, because geopolitically it is very close to Hong Kong has everything for precisely with that vision that the Chinese had to be an exclusive economic zone, the most important and that it has the best development. And that' s why I set it as an example in China and the world. And those are precisely the geopolitical aspects that are necessary, especially for our rulers, to analyze to take action on many things.

But speaking of international trade in this branch, if we had thought better about continuing with those areas, I think we would have done better than with the transoceanicism, which is being attempted, because historically we have seen that congratulations have failed. Alejandro extraordinary so much I loved your talk very well really, uh, thank you, thank you, very much listen gras comments, because here

there are many congratulations. The truth is that they say the masterful way you expose it, not applauding your exhibition and take the opportunity to throw the entire three- week team in Mexico and let' s barter to give you this

virtual recognition, Alex. The truth is, thank you very much for sharing your knowledge, Alejandro al licenciado, Alejandro Alcalte, for doing a little in the usual practice with the geopolitical issue and foreign trade, on September 6 of the two thousand twenty- three, signed by Dr Fede la Torre and your servant, Alex. Thank you so much. Really super practical. Thank you always a pleasure to greet you, a privilege to be here thanks to everyone,

to my friends who gave me your greetings. Good afternoon we' ve reached the end of today' s trout. Thank you so much for joining us. This was let' s make a viazom barter an event of tels Magas and Mexico. If you like this talk, don' t forget to share each event with your contacts so that we continue to spread knowledge and stay up to date. Find all our talks through our online education platform, entering www FTAs Mexico com mx in the course section, where you can see them

again without things. If you are interested in any specific topic, send us a message through the social networks of Magas TVs in Mexico and we will look for an expert who can clarify your doubts. This was let' s make a truek.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android