Thoughtful Thursdays: Fixing a lack of commitment on your team. - podcast episode cover

Thoughtful Thursdays: Fixing a lack of commitment on your team.

May 04, 202316 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

On this week's Thoughtful Thursday, we discuss more about how a lack of commitment can lead to low performance on your team.

Text us your leadership questions! +1 (213) 444-5381

Patreon Account: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=22174142

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/hacking-your-leadership-podcast--4805674/support.

Transcript

Welcome to Hacking Your Leadership. I'm Chris Lorenzo and welcome to this week's Thoughtful Thursday. Don't forget to follow us on YouTube at Hacking Your Leadership and leave us a review on iTunes. On this Thoughtful Thursday, we're going to be diving in a little bit deeper into the Monday episode that just aired a few days ago, which was part three in our four part series on you know, overcoming dysfunctions on a team to make it, you know, more high

performing. On Monday's episode, we talked about a lack of commitment being one of the reasons why a team might not be high performing, and the feedback that we got from our our listeners was that they wanted to know more about what they can do as leaders to kind of spur more commitment from their people

when there doesn't seem to be that. And that's it's a really tough one because it's not a universal answer for all people, Like some people need different things than others, and a lot of it really depends on what the goals are of your people, and so it's it's it's not just as simple as you know they want to move up because they might necessarily want to move up.

They might have different goals than your goals. And I think a lot of times when leaders fail at this, it's because they project their own goals onto their people and they think, well, if this is what I want, then this is what my people want. So if I get treated if I want to be treated this way by my boss, then this is how I'm gonna treat my people because they clearly want the same things as me. And oftentimes that kind of doesn't even land and you without the commitment that you

need from your people. So this is it's kind of a touchy subject here. No, I agree. I think that there's elements of this that when in the context of high performing teams that you know, I think that there's the surface idea of like we say, like commitment rah rah, Let's go like, are we committed to this work? Yeah? Do we want to do a great job? Absolutely, let's be the best okay, And like there's this overall element of kind of the cheerleading commitment piece of this. But

when you start to pull back these layers of commitment. We talk a lot on this podcast about helping people with you know, professional and personal goals, and I think that's really what we mean when we say personal goals, like do you really understand what people are trying to achieve in life? Do you do? You do you understand like what they are, what drives them, what motivates them, you know, why, why do they work hard? Why do they want to have success at work? What do the things they're

looking to achieve? And when you start to find these things out, I think that is very helpful in understanding people's level of commitments and and you know, to themselves, to their families, to to their growth, to their you know, success later on in life, whatever that might be. But I think as leaders, these are the conversations that I think are really helpful in helping to connect some of the dots for people to like, how does my you know, how how does my professional work or my job help to

inform the things I want to get in life? And how and how do

do these things you know? Connect? And I think in theory we would all say like, well, yeah, if you work hard, do a good job, you can get you can make more money, you can have more of this, and then than by kind of by proxy, you should then be able to you know, purchase a house have some nicer things, maybe get a new car, like these things are going to happen, but sometimes we don't take the time to really have the dialogue around what are those

things and how do they connect, and how do you stay motivated when times get tough, and how do you stay you know, committed to yourself and to the work when things aren't as easy as they were before. I agree with that. I think the tie in between that level of commitment that you might be asking of your people and what they see in it for themselves, it can be harder to to kind of fit those two together if you are dealing with people or if people are reporting to you who don't necessarily have a

clear line of sight to what they want. And I think and oftentimes because of the you know, we talk about how there's this h there used to be this huge separation between your work life your personal life and you leave your leave your your baggage at the door, and you come in and you do work. And that was the thing, you know, twenty years ago, and and slowly and over time it's been we've transitioned to this. Well, if you if you want to be a good leader, you can't expect your

people to just leave their personal life at the door. They're one person and they their personal life comes with them and it can impact their performance at work. And if you, as a leader just expect them that, expect that to go away, then you're gonna have a bad time because they're not going it's not going to go away. They'll just have it impact their performance and

you'll never know, you know why it's happening. Um, if we're in, if we've agreed that that is important to acknowledge the fact that we're not leaving our personal life at the door, and that and that we are one individual, then that the next logical step would be too As a leader, you need to dig into whatever that is, whatever those things are that is that motivate that individual or that lead them to believe that they are in a

place that they should be to do their best work. Because nobody, nobody wants to spend time doing anything half asked. Nobody wants to They would rather not be doing that thing. It's just it's who we are as individuals. If we're doing something half asked, it means that we don't really want to be doing it at all. And the half asked is I know I still have to do this, so I'm going to do it anyway, but I

don't really want to be doing it. If we want to do something, then it will show in what the work is because we will be committed to doing it. And if your people are not trying to move up within your organization, like genuinely, they just look at this as a stepping stone or they you know, this is kind of like a means to an end. That doesn't mean that they shouldn't be or can't be committed to getting the work

done at a high performing level. It just means that you, as the leader, have to do some work to dig into what would make them want to do that. And they will never want to do it for the organization air quotes. They'll want to do it for you as as their leader,

if you have set the stage for that happening. And so what I want to ask you, Lorenzo, is if you ever had a situation where you had a person who you knew they had it in them, You knew they were capable of doing it because you've seen them do it, but because they didn't look at themselves as having a future with your organization, they just you have found up having a really hard time getting them to go to do anything above just whatever the minimum was, and you had to kind of dig into

to figure out what was really motivating them and what could kind of turn the tide on that so that they looked at it as they were committing to you and not the organization. So I want to ask you that, but my first I want to give it up towards one of our sponsors. All Right, Lorenzo, when did you have to kind of dig deep and you know, find find some way of motivating an employee or or to get them to commit when they weren't necessarily trying to move up within the organization. I think

it's happened to multiple times in really two different ways. I think there's the commitment around just you know, wanting to do good work or great work. I think, and maybe I come from a different school of thought on this, Like I don't see it as a requirement for people to have to want to move up like in an organization, Like I just don't like I think that the disconnect happens when somebody says, maybe I want to move up in the organization, but then I also am not wanting to do the work like

I don't have the motivation. So that's kind of how I see that. It is like the assumption, let's play an assumption of I want to continue to build my career, whether that's you know, to become full time, to get a promotion, to have a different level of responsibility. But if we play in the context if that's what I want, but then I'm not maybe showing the behaviors or I'm not committed to doing a level of work that

either prepares me for it or makes me the best possible candidate. Because that's another thing that can happen is that we can have multi people that want a role um, but then we have to make decisions on who the best person is for the role. So in those cases where I've had that conversation with people, UM, that's where I've had to ask the connective questions to say, like, let's just pull all of this back right. You're saying you want this role, so first just just tell me why. What is it

about the role? Is it the is it how you spend your day, is it the work that you do? Is it the element of responsibility? Is it the compensation? Like it could be any of these things, but like let's just start with you know what, what about this role is it that you really want to have? Now, let's say, well why, and we getting kind of like the practice of the five whys. Why is

that important to you? Why do you want that? And really what we're looking for is like, well, how does this help you as a person? Like look what's in this for you? And like what are you looking to achieve maybe outside of work as a result of doing this, like like you know, like talk a little bit more about that. And I think just really having that open conversation with somebody, I think it's it's it's you

know, there's there's two outcomes out of it. And I would say that eighty to ninety percent of the time, the outcome is having a conversation where I'm helping someone connect the dots of their personal goals, their personal aspirations, what they want to achieve and why it's you know, like like like doing well at work or pushing themselves to to bring more or to learn and to

grow and develop, like how that helps to inform their personal goals. And like I said, eighty to ninety percent of the time that conversation happens, some of those connections are met and people say, I understand, and that makes sense to me, and you know, I'm going to, um, I'm going to you know, look to to to show up in a different way so that I can achieve that goal that I have at work. UM.

And again not that not that eighty nine percent is successful. I'm just saying that eighty ninety percent of the conversations are in that positive way or in

down that direction. The other ten to twenty percent, I think in that conversation we tend to uncover that maybe this isn't the right work that they want to do because the personal goal or the thing they want to achieve, or the life they want to live, or just the thing in general that they want out of life is not something that the job, the role, the industry, whatever, is going to help them get there in the way they want to. And that's okay too, because I think that that's important to

have that conversation sometimes when we see people that may not be motivated. And again we're we're talking about high performing teams here, but I think in a high performing team, you need to know these answers for every single person on the team. Because when it gets tough, that's when they need to lean

into it. But I think it's just as important that we have the conversation with people where it ends with you know what, like maybe this isn't the right, you know, direction for me, And then I get to say, but that's okay, because like, as long as you're willing to do the work or good work here or great work here, you know you're able to meet expectations, that's perfectly fine. While you figure out what it is

that you want to do or the direction that you want to go. And as long as you're doing good work here, I'm all in in helping, whether it's my network, whether it's perspective, whether it's plugging you in with other people, like like, I will be more than willing to help you get to that other thing that you want to accomplish, so long as you're

doing good work here. But then we can, we can. We don't have to spend all this time like trying to figure out how do you give you know even more, or how do you fully commit to wanting to move your career that might happen, that might happen as a result of you doing good work But I think this should really really important conversations to have and and to make sure that we are we're both moving in the right direction and that

we're really clear on the goals that we're looking to try to achieve together. Yeah, I agree with that. I think I think where a lot of times this gets lost though, and I think the leaders that do this well are the are the ones who have managed to make it clear that high performing. High performance is not above and beyond. High performance is not doing doing more work than what is being asked of you. High performance is what is

being asked the team is. The team needs to be a high performing team, and and people doing only work that they're not committed to will not get you to high performing, which means the expectation that the expectation of the role is a commitment to whatever that work is. And if there are employees who are showing up, who are doing work that it's clear they're not committed to, that doesn't mean that they're doing you know, like we talk about doing

the bare minimum. Well, the bare minimum is being a high performing team. That's what is the expectation. And if and if a person is doing what is expected of them, then you will have a high performing team. And so if you're a leader, it's just so important to make sure that you like you owe it to the people on your team who are committed and who are doing good work, who are who do want to be members of a high performing team, to make sure that everybody on that team is also

committed to doing that as well. And if they're not, then that's fine, but they need to be moved off. They moved out of the team, as opposed to being allowed to do less than committed work simply because they believe that committing to the work is somehow more than what they're being paid for, more than what they signed up for. And so if you can, if you can make that tie in that that is the minimum, the minimum standard is what will get us to be a high performing team. I think

that you can go a lot further with that. Yeah, no, I appreciate that. I think the you know, just to add a point to that, I think that it's important to also, like we've talked about the different ways in which this kind of builds on for a high performing team, you cannot start here. You cannot start with saying, oh, congratulations, everyone, we are now a high performing team because I said so, right, and if you're not committed to being a high performing you can't be here

anymore. That's not that's not going to get you. You need to do the first steps right to get to the point of then saying, as a result of the fact that we are high performing and we want to maintain the consistency that we have in our performance, we have to commit to one another that this is the body of work that we want to do when we move collectively together. UM. So I just want to add that a little bit

of a caveat because I think it's important. Um if especially if people are like hearing this episode first before the other ones, yes, to think like you cannot start here and then say like this is the new bar. Um. The only time that you can do that is if the if, the if the results and if the behaviors are well below an expectation, you can say this is the expectation, um at the bottom of where we want to

be, and then we're going to go up from here. But you can't make that mistake, because I've seen that happen, and that can it can get dangerous very quickly, right right. If you're if you're taking over a team that is woefully underperforming, then then there could be a minimum standard that they have to reach in order to just kind of, you know, stop the bleeding whatever that is right, and and then that could be expected that

that could be expected where you have objective results on paper. I don't think that's necessarily high performing. That's just we want to show that this that we're not that we're not the boat's not about to sink here. That's different. Once you get to the level where the boat's not sinking anymore, then that's that's the next step, which is, Hey, now, as a leader, this is what I'm committing to you. Let's talk about what your goals are. Let's commit to this. But yes, that has to be done

first. If you were doing that, though, you owe it to your team to be able to ask that in return of everybody on the team. If you know that you're doing your part as a leader, you can ask that of your team and you have you have an obligation to do that absolutely, And with that it brings us to the end of this episode. This is hacking your leadership. M Lorenzo and I'm Chris, and have a great day.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android