¶ Battle Against Leftist Agendas and Tactics
When you use intel agencies and law enforcement to illegally go after your political opponents for non-crimes, that is the definition of a conspiracy against rights, a very serious federal civil rights felony under 18 USC Section 241. And so I would say to all of those people you just named, and many, many others lawyer up.
Welcome back to Going Rogue with Laura Logan. My guest today is someone who is at the forefront of President Trump's legal battles, a man who has known the president for some time and who is not afraid to say exactly what he thinks, which is my kind of person. Welcome to the show, mike.
Davis, thank you for having me.
Mike Davis. Okay, Mike, so can you give us just a little sense of what does it mean? I know you're the founder of the Article 3 Project, which is a conservative legal advocacy group.
Yep.
And can you explain what you do?
Well, I get on Twitter and I fight with people. I've noticed that, but besides, that, so I started the Article 3 Project back in 2019. I was the chief counsel for nominations on the Senate Judiciary Committee. I helped Gorsuch get through the process as my former boss on the Supreme Court you were a clerk for him. I was a law clerk for Justice Gorsuch twice.
I was his first clerk back in Denver, colorado, in 2006 or whatever it was, and then, 10 years later, I was his first clerk on the Supreme Court as the elderly law clerk, helping him get set up until he got the younger, smarter law clerks to come, whatever it was. And then, 10 years later, I was his first clerk on the Supreme Court as the elderly law clerk, helping him get set up until he got the younger, smarter law clerks to come and replace me.
But so I went to the Senate Judiciary Committee to work for Senator Chuck Grassley from Iowa, my home state senator. I was his chief counsel for nominations. I had opened his mail right out of college and then 18, then 17 years later, I was one of his lawyers to help him get President Trump's judicial nominees confirmed, including Justice Kavanaugh. So, that was first time around.
Yeah, that was in the first two years and I did that for two years and I saw during the Kavanaugh confirmation that the right had a void with someone who had insider experience, who was willing to go fight. And so I had those things. I had worked in the Bush 43 White House. I had worked in the Justice Department. I had worked for House Speaker Newt Gingrich. I had worked in the Senate.
I've kind of clerked on the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, clerked for the Supreme Court, worked for a US attorney.
So you've had just a little experience.
Not at all Just enough to go into these jobs and break all the China and get chased out. So I saw that we had to set up a group who was willing to fight back against the left. So that's why I started the Article III project.
And what do you mean? Fight back against the left? What does that mean to you?
For me, when you grow up with red hair, you're kind of used to getting into fights and getting punched in the face. So if you're not getting punched in the face, you don't know what's happening. So I always say the people on the right just need to have thicker skins. We need to stop caring what people think about us, and the Democrats always use race, racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia whatever phobia they want to use. We need to stop caring.
We need to follow our principles and do what we think is right and get the job done. And who gives a damn what people think about us?
Well, it's interesting that you raise that because right now there is a growing sense among a lot of people I don't know if you want to call them conservatives on the right, republicans, trump supporters, whatever you want to call them but when you read what people are saying publicly and you listen, there's a sense of frustration that Republicans, trump gets elected, everything goes nuts right. The media screams and shouts every day.
You know, in Congress they're screaming and shouting every day. They're on the streets protesting, screaming and shouting, burning down cities and it's just, it's complete chaos. They do every single thing that they can Apparently. You know every attorney that ever worked for the ACLU or anyone else is busy filing a lawsuit. It's a cacophony. And then Biden gets in to office and where's the right? We're conservatives. And then Trump gets back in.
It feels like the same playbook over and over and over again and you actually watch people commit crimes like treason and sedition. I mean, there's there was a real seditious conspiracy that was carried out to undermine trump in his first term and undermine illegally elected, take trump out of it, illegally elected president and the will of the people and all of those people who were involved in that. They were all active during the Biden administration and now they're doing it to Trump again.
Same people, same playbook. What the hell is the right doing? What the hell are you doing, mike?
Yeah, that's exactly right. I always say that too many Republicans are the string orchestra on the Titanic. They want to look majestic as the Titanic's going down, and I'm not that type of Republican. I want to fight. I want to fight the left. We need to stop being wimps on the right, particularly Republican lawyers. We have to learn how to play the game like the Democrats. Play the game, use their tactics and beat them right, because the only thing the left respects is power.
That is their goal, or God is power on earth, because they're godless mostly, and so their religion or strategy to their goal or God of power is Marxism, but they can't publicly talk about being a Marxist is Marxism, but they can't publicly talk about being a Marxist. And so they use various tactics or religious sects to divide and conquer us, whether it's BLM, antifa, hamas, 15 pronouns transgender chaos anything they can do to divide and conquer our country. That's what they do.
It's driven by Soros, it's driven by Obama, it's driven by China, and what they want to do is they want to make us hate each other as a country. They want us to hate our country and they're going to destroy us from within. It's subversion.
Yes, and I would say to you that it's not just the left or Democrats. There's plenty of that within the Republican side.
Democrats. There's plenty of that within the Republican side. Yeah, I mean, they're the useful idiots as I, as I call them. There's the or traders, or the traders, the people who sell out for money. But the rhinos, yeah, exactly, I mean you see this. You see these on the courts, right? You see these with the judges. You see these radical Obama and Biden activist judges, hardcore leftist, hardcore Marxist.
And then you have their useful idiot Republicans, republican judges and lawyers who think that this is our parents' and grandparents' Democrat Party, still that these are liberals who love America and just disagree with us on the best way to get there. These are leftists. They hate America. They hate free speech. They believe in censorship under the guise of protecting us from misinformation and disinformation. They hate equality.
They believe in censorship under the guise of protecting us from misinformation and disinformation. They hate equality. They believe in equity. We see this with BLM. They hate due process. They believe in politicized and weaponized justice right. Until Republicans, particularly Republican lawyers, understand what we're up against, we're never going to defeat this.
What does it take? I mean, I don't know what it takes for them to understand what we're up against. I mean, when I say we, you know I don't define myself as Republican or Democrat. I don't define myself in political terms. I get, you know, hammered because anything I say, it gets miscast as being. You know, I'm extreme right wing, I'm a. You know whatever they want to say about me, but the reality is, if you believe in freedom today, that makes you right wing.
If you believe in tolerance, that also makes you right wing. If you believe in equality, somehow that makes you right wing too. I mean, I don't really know how we got from where we were from this place where tolerance was sort of the whole idea of of the left, and now it's become sort of this extremist value, it's sort of it's.
It's it's crazy how quickly that has happened, because it really, you know, they built, built, built towards that and then it accelerated Right and I and I guess it's it's part of what you would call ambiguity decreasing in information warfare right, where there was so much deception involved originally that you didn't see people for who they were. But as ambiguity decreases, you start to see people reveal themselves for who they truly are.
Yeah, they really took off their masks after the BLM riots and after the COVID lockdowns. We really saw them for who they are. We saw this during the lawfare against President Trump over the last four years. They tried to bankrupt him for non-fraud. They tried to throw him in prison for the rest of his life four times for non-crimes. They tried to just illegally, unconstitutionally, take him off the ballot. They tried to just illegally, unconstitutionally take him off the ballot.
They tried to take off his head. They underfunded his Secret Service protection intentionally. Joe Biden said to put a bullseye on him in the speech and said he was the gravest threat since Hitler. Essentially Put a bullseye on him and then underfunded his Secret Service protection, almost got him killed twice. That we know about right, and thank God President Trump won this election, because I really think if President Trump would have lost this election, our country would have been over.
We would have lost control of the Supreme Court and the federal judiciary, and then it's game over America. There goes our God-given rights to speak, to worship, to associate, to protect ourselves. Everything was on the line this election. Look, I grew up Catholic. I'm not a terribly religious person. I still have the Catholic guilt that comes with 13 years of Catholic school. But there is no question in my mind that what happened at Butler, pennsylvania he was saved by God, there's no question.
No, there's no question about that, there's no question. And that bullet went through his ear because I think we had to see how close it was to understand how close we came to lose everything. And look, I don't think President Trump is a Bible beater, nor am I. But I think even he would understand I think he said this publicly that he has a higher calling Now. He has to save our country so we can save the world.
Anyone who knows me knows I'm pretty particular about the information that I put out there, which means I really only want to bring you information about products from people that I put out there, which means I really only want to bring you information about products from people that I truly believe in. So that means the best products put out by the very best people.
And for me, when it comes to nutrition and health, I love what Ascent Nutrition is doing, because I know that they are not going to settle for anything less than the best and that they really are on a mission to make health accessible to as many people as they can. And how do they do that? Well, for them, it's really important to source organic and wild harvested products that they put a lot of work into finding from some of the cleanest places on earth.
Two of the products that you know I'm really familiar with are the pine needle extract, which actually tastes better than you think, and humic and fulvic acid, which is what I take every day, both incredibly important for this moment, with everything we've been through with COVID and as we learn more and more about why healthy detoxing is important for gut health and brain function. I also love organic lion's mane and agaricone mushroom powders. The South African me likes the lion's mane part.
These can also be good for your pets, your cats and dogs and you know no shortage of cats and dogs around this podcast and if you're a coffee drinker, which I am, they have an organic, mold and mycotoxin-free coffee, which is pretty amazing. I actually love the taste of it.
I do remember the first time I had their coffee it was a freezing cold day and it was full of rain, you know and I was very happy to get that hot, steaming cup of coffee, which is where I had the pleasure of meeting the founder of Ascent Nutrition, who is a great guy, lance Shetler.
And what I appreciate about Lance is how aware he is of the bigger picture that's been going on in the world over the last few years and how he has created these products with that in mind and how important it is to him to try to protect us from the many different toxins that we've been exposed to. If you want to find out more about what ascent nutrition is doing, you can go to GoAscentNutritioncom. Forward slash, lara. That's GoAscentNutritioncom. Forward slash, lara.
I really do want to say a very genuine thank you to Lance for supporting our podcast, for being willing to go rogue with Lara Logan and my team and for being a supporter of our work.
¶ Deception and Fascism in Politics
The only question I have is Lance is willing to go rogue, are you? You know? The thing that bothers me, though, mike, is you're not wrong. I mean, people saw it. People saw that bullet just miss Trump's head. I mean, it's just, it can only be an act of God that does something like that. But how quickly we forget, we still don't even know. Honestly, I spoke to a number of ballistic specialists after that and not one of them believes that there was that. That guy on the roof was the real shooter.
They all believe that there was a second shooter. That's what they all told me, and we don't have answers on that. I mean, I just think it's extraordinary. We are just. We're really in an odd time, because it's like we're in the midst of an undeclared war, but everybody's pretending that things are normal.
Yeah, it's a spiritual war and we see demonic forces in this world and we're up against a lot of demonic forces all over the world and I think it's driven a lot by these godless Marxist monsters. Right, they want heaven on earth, they want power on earth. That's what drives them. They want to control the world. They take sadistic pleasure in controlling other people. They don't believe in freedom. We talked about this. They're not liberals.
They talk about President Trump being a fascist, which I think is just laughable. How many fascists want to dismantle the executive branch? Why would a fascist want to get rid of his power? Why would he want to get rid of federal agencies he controls? If he's a fascist, why does he want to return power back to the states and the American people, as it's required under the Constitution? Why would a fascist do that? They wouldn't. The real fascists are the Democrats.
They're the ones who want to consolidate power in Washington DC. They're the ones who want unelected bureaucrats, who are only accountable to them, to control our lives. They're the ones who want legislative, judicial and executive power wrapped up into the Tony Fauci's of the world right, these all-powerful government officials who can control our lives. All-powerful government officials who can control our lives.
The American people saw during BLM riots and the mostly peaceful protests that caused $2 billion in damage and killed a dozen people and destroyed cities, destroyed the Portland federal courthouse on a nightly basis for six months. The American people saw during the mindless, science-free COVID lockdowns, where they made up the cloth mask mandate, they made up the six-foot rule, they lied about vaccine efficacy.
They got away with it Because they're the fascists who not only controlled governments, they controlled media. They controlled social media Before Elon Musk came along, along, if you question yes, they had complete and utter dominance and control information control, information dominance.
Yeah, you know, they just dominated the entire information space, but okay we are terrible.
We are terrible fascist. If, if conservatives are fascist, we're the worst fascist on the planet. Right, it's the. The democrat party has become the fascist party that wants to control speech. They want to control religion, they want to control our movements, they want to control what we think. They want to control what we say. That's the definition of fascism.
When you have governments working with monopolists like Google, amazon, facebook and Apple to control information, to control commerce, to control our thoughts, those are the fascists.
Well, and if you go back and you look at it, everyone just conveniently forgets that the Nazi stands for national socialists. Right, I mean, they were socialists. And if you look at the platforms, neither of them believe in God. Communists are atheists. Fascists don't want you to have a God because they want to be the God. Right that? Neither of them believe in free markets. They don't believe in free speech.
I mean, you start to go down the list and you realize that they have more in common than not. Yeah, you know, but I think it's part of this deception that we've been under. It's projection, it's projection, they do project. They project their values onto you. So it's just like these are the tactics that they used against Trump when they accused him. What they accused him of doing in Ukraine, joe Biden had already done. They had already done it.
Every single time they accuse him of something, they're projecting their own behavior onto them, because attack is the best form of defense. Yeah, and it's worked for them. I mean, if you remember when Dinesh D'Souza first was a political commentator and he came out and said that the KKK was the party of Democrats, everybody went nuts. It's true.
And it's true. Yeah, so it's. I mean, look at what they do. They do these, they do this deception, this sabotage of the president, and they've done this for eight years. Remember Crossfire Hurricane. Let's talk about what they did to President Trump back in 2016. Hillary Clinton, as you know, had her illegal home server with our nation's most classified secrets. And not only that. It had the Clinton Foundation pay for play foreign bribery schemes.
Right, she's taking money into the Clinton Foundation tens of millions of dollars from foreign actors and she's the Secretary of State. Maybe, just maybe, that server had evidence that she is doing official acts in exchange for those tens of millions of dollars in donations that they're getting from these foreign actors quid pro quo, foreign corruption. They got caught with this illegal home server. It probably got hacked by the Chinese and the Russians.
Maybe more Hillary thought she deleted this home server. She bleach bit it. Remember, she destroyed the handheld devices with a hammer. But maybe, just maybe, the Russians and the Chinese had a copy and maybe they were using it as blackmail against her. And maybe, just maybe, that server was going to get released before the 2016 election.
And maybe, just maybe, that's why Hillary Clinton and Perkins Coie made up the Steele dossier, lied about Russian collusion, lied to the FISA court, spied on Trump as a candidate, spied on Trump as the president of the United States. Maybe, just maybe, crossfire Hurricane is what's driving all of this lawfare, these assassination attempts against President Trump. They're trying to destroy him because he declassified Crossfire Hurricane and that's why they tried to bankrupt him.
That's why they tried to throw him in prison for the rest of his life. That's why they frankly, I think that's why they underfunded his Secret Service protection when President Trump just this week, last week, he declassified Crossfire Hurricane again. Right, and when that gets out, when they start investigating Crossfire Hurricane, the House of Cards is going to crumble on the Democrats, on Obama, biden, hillary, clapper, comey.
A lot of very bad actors are going to be exposed with Crossfire Hurricane.
Why didn't he do it the first time around?
Here's what happened. He wanted to get those records released and remember the director of national intelligence, the CIA. They said you can't declassify these, you can't make them public sources and methods. Yeah, I remember.
But wasn't that the DNI you're talking about was Ratcliffe?
Yeah Well, and then Rick Grinnell goes over there with Kash Patel. They declassify via presidential order. The day before Trump leaves office, they declassify Crossfire Hurricane. They waited too long. And then he declassifies them on January 19th 2021, the day before he leaves office.
Yeah.
The FBI, the intel agencies, run into the White House and they say you can't publicly release these sources and methods, sources and methods. You're going to get people killed. So Mark Meadows, the chief of staff, issued a memo on January 20th the day they leave office, january 20th 2021. Do your Privacy Act review and then get out these documents. Well, guess what?
Of course, they didn't do it, they didn't get out the documents.
They did the Mar-a-Lago raid. That was the point of the Mar-a-Lago raid was to go get back those documents. What happened was that after Trump left office, he sued Hillary Clinton for a crossfire hurricane civil lawsuit down in Florida. Bruce Reinhart's the magistrate judge on the case. He had the Trump's attorneys raise the fact that he was anti-Trump. He posted anti-Trump things on Facebook and so he had to recuse from that case.
I remember Six weeks later, six weeks later, Bruce Reinhart is the magistrate judge who signs the Mar-a-Lago raid right? So you have the intel officials, Jay Brat, who went on to work for Jack Smith. You had Jay Brat working with Bruce Reinhart to do the raid on Mar-a-Lago. How did his recusal issue from six weeks prior, where he's trashing President Trump on Facebook in 2017, how did that recusal issue go when he signed that Mar-a-Lago raid?
The point of the Mar-a-Lago raid was to get back Crossfire Hurricane. It was not for classified records. Presidents have classified records all the time. They're allowed to have their presidential records classified or not under the Presidential Records Act. It doesn't matter whether they're classified. That's why presidents get secure office space, secret Service protection, security clearances, SCIFs. They get all that because they get to keep their presidential records.
They can access their presidential records anytime they want. A presidential record is any document created or received to advise the president, and if the CIA is giving the president a document to advise him, that's a presidential record that the president can access anytime he wants. That's why he has the security clearances.
Even when he's not the president anymore.
Even when now Trump has Biden cut that off for Trump when Trump left, and so Trump just did the same thing for Biden. They lost their security clearances, but at the time Trump was allowed to have those records right.
Yeah, and you know who wasn't Was At the time Trump was allowed to have those records right. Yeah, and you know who wasn't Was Biden, when he was vice president, Because that doesn't apply to the vice president.
Well, he had six stashes of stolen classified records from his time not only as vice president, he had it from his time as senator. So that means he had to have like remember that the national security advisor for Clinton who shoved the classified documents down his pants when he was at the archives. That's essentially what Joe Biden would have had to have done.
He would have had to have gone into the Senate skiff and taken those records out of the Senate skiff right To get them out of out of the Senate skiff to his home. And he they found those records. They found six stashes of stolen classified records moved several times, accessible by their Chinese agent. Joe Biden is on tape sharing these classified records with his ghostwriter to publish in a book.
And he says that these are classified.
I'm not supposed to show these to you, he didn't even deny it. And then Hunter is using almost certainly using classified records on Ukraine to draft a 23 paragraph memo on Ukraine to secure millions of dollars in Ukraine funding. Because when you look at Hunter Biden when he's not smoking his crack pipe and banging prostitutes, he's clearly a geopolitical expert in Ukraine, right? Obviously he used stolen classified records to do that.
Not a damn thing happens to Biden because they found this at the same time that they learned about these records that Trump was allowed to have in the office of former president. They keep the Biden thing secret and sweep it under the rug and then they do the raid on Trump. It's just unbelievable.
Okay. So it is unbelievable, and you know what it really pisses me off. And I'm not alone. Okay, there's many people out there who feel this way, and you know what makes us even angrier? They get away with it over and over and over again. I mean John Brennan, susan Rice, james Clapper, hillary Clinton, mark Elias. You know, I mean all of these people. Jake Sullivan, they got to do it to Trump the first time around and then nothing happened to them. They got.
You had to watch the Trump administration dance to their tune over a this. Oh, there was a that. Then they go back into the government. After the 2020 election was stolen, they go back into the government. They go back into positions of power. They do even more damage. They do all the things that you're talking about, sweep all these things under the rug and then, oh yeah, guess what? Now they're doing it again.
Well, I would say this that President Trump, the first time he had never run for office, he had never served in office, he made mistakes. He got a lot done, but he made mistakes and one of the mistakes he made was hiring bad people right and putting weak, bad people in key jobs. He's had four years in office. He's had four years to reflect. He's faced four years of lawfare. During that time of reflection he was ready to govern on day one.
This time he is not making the mistakes he made in the first term. He's hiring the right people, bold and fearless people who are going in there. And I would say this that when you use intel agencies and law enforcement to illegally go after your political opponents for non-crimes, that is the definition of a conspiracy against rights, a very serious federal civil rights felony under 18 USC Section 241.
And so I would say to all of those people you just named, and many, many others lawyer up, because this is an ongoing criminal conspiracy the statute of limitations has not even began to start tolling because it's ongoing and you can go all the way back to Crossfire Hurricane eight years ago as part of this ongoing criminal conspiracy against rights.
And so they should lawyer up that there is a new sheriff in town at the Justice Department in the name of Pam Bondi and Kash Patel and many others, and I am going to push very hard, very publicly, for them to open a federal criminal probe under 18 USC.
How is it not already open?
Maybe it is.
Okay, maybe it is. You wouldn't tell us if it was would you?
I wouldn't have that information. Of course, I'm just a private citizen.
Okay, I'll let you get away with that one, for obvious reasons. I mean, there's a big issue here which is the legal issue is much bigger, but this is, I mean, when you look at it, I mean it's obvious, this is vast conspiracy and it's not just Section 241. What about treason and sedition? Yeah, I mean because there is also a seditious conspiracy where PETA stroke, I mean FBI counterintelligence was involved.
Counterintelligence is supposed to be your protection against this and you literally have the head of the FBI, the head of the CIA, the DNI, the counterintelligence officials within the FBI. You have them working together as part of a seditious conspiracy with lawyers, with the Clintons and others, the Obamas, the Sally Yateses of this world, the Norma Isons, the David Brocks they're all working together. I mean, are you telling them to lawyer up too?
I think that anyone who is involved in a conspiracy with intel agencies and law enforcement to target your political opponents for non-crimes, like they've done. I would say to them lawyer up, justice is coming, and when?
¶ Judicial Sabotage of Presidency
Well, I mean, you see these law firms losing their security clearances.
You see these law firms this is true, and this is a good sign.
You see them losing their government contracts. You see the ponds being taken out right.
Yes, but you do see that. However, poconskoui, the law firm, immediately launched a lawsuit to fight that. So what many American people don't want to see happen this time around is to see the Trump administration be pushed. Sure, trump came in ready to govern on day one, no question about it. He demonstrated that. But what has happened since is over 150 lawsuits launched against his administration and chipping away, chipping away, chipping away.
Putting the administration back on defense yeah, chipping away, chipping away, chipping away, putting the administration back on defense yeah. And what people don't know is how much does that derail the agenda? How much does that stall? How much time does that buy his enemies?
Yeah.
Because what they don't see is yes, people are losing their security clearances, and that's a big deal. Yes, people are losing their government contractsances, and that's a big deal. Yes, people are losing their government contracts. We don't care about that anymore. Dr Fauci was responsible for the death of millions of people. The fact that he doesn't have his job anymore isn't good enough. Usaid has been funding a radical Marxist agenda all over the world.
We have been giving out business loans to children. We have been sending Social Security and Medicare payments overseas To dead people, and to dead people 150-year-olds yes, and no one has yet been held accountable for any of that.
Well, I don't know if that's fair because, remember, we're two months in and look at how much President Trump has done. Look, he campaigned on the fact that he's going to hire Elon Musk. He's going to set up the Department of Government Efficiency in Doge, he's going to secure our border and he's going to get illegal immigrants, particularly dangerous illegal immigrants, particularly dangerous illegal immigrants from MS-13 and foreign terrorists from Trende Aragua the hell out of America.
And President Trump is actually doing the unthinkable in American politics. He's actually doing what he promised American voters he would do. The American people gave him a broad electoral mandate 312 electoral votes, all seven swing states, the popular vote. He kept the House. He won a comfortable margin in the Senate. The American people, they expect that he's going to lead and he's leading. He's leading on day one and that's why these Democrat activists are panicking.
I mean, look what he's done. He went and ripped the sign off of USAID and he's canceled hundreds of billions of dollars in government contracts and spending. And then, had a judge order him to pay it. Well, that's just it. And this is my point the Democrats' last line of defense. Because they don't have the House, they don't have the Senate, they're losing these executive branch agencies that were their subversive actors, the deep state right.
They're losing all this and so they're running to their activist judges right. You have these Democrat lawyers running to these Democrat activist judges, particularly in DC, and they are sabotaging the presidency. They are sabotaging the president's core Article II powers. President Trump is not stealing legislative power from Congress under Article I. President Trump is not stealing the Supreme Court's judicial power under Article III.
He is exercising core Article II executive power, right, and that's what the American people elected the president to do. And you have these activist judges who are sabotaging the presidency. And I would say this I've said this very publicly to the chief justice and I clerked on the Supreme Court. I know John Roberts, I like him personally. I disagree with his judicial philosophy, but I like him.
I would say this to the chief Justice I was the Chief Counsel for nominations on the Senate Judiciary Committee. I had the oversight portfolio for federal judges. If the Chief Justice does not get his judicial house in order. Congress is going to do it for him and I'm working very closely right now. What do you mean?
How, through legislation, through cutting their funding, through forcing legislation to cut their power, to doing oversight for impeaching the most radical of these judges who are sabotaging the president and putting our national security in danger? Why hasn't that begun? It has so we had, for example, you had a member of the House who has introduced articles of impeachment against DC Obama Judge Jeb Andrew Ogles. He's one of them. He's the Tennessee guy.
There's a new congressman from Texas, brandon Giles, who introduced articles of impeachment against DC Obama judge, jeb Boasberg. Let's look at what Jeb Boasberg did. This is an Obama judge who went into his courthouse a couple Saturdays ago, opened up his courthouse even though he didn't have the emergency docket that weekend. It was assigned to a different judge.
He opens up his courthouse during the middle of President Trump's ongoing military, intel and law enforcement operation to get the most dangerous terrorist in the Western Hemisphere, trende Aragua, along with the most vicious gang in the Western Hemisphere, ms-13, the hell out of America he had. President Trump was working with one of our key allies, the president of El Salvador, to take these terrorists, to take these vicious gang members, into El Salvador.
This Judge Boasberg opened a hearing during the middle of this, exposing the military operation putting American and allied lives in grave danger. We saw the security footprints in El Salvador. We saw hundreds of people in law enforcement, intel, military in El Salvador ready to accept these dangerous terrorists. This judge actually ordered the planes of these terrorists to turn around. This judge didn't know the fuel levels.
He didn't know the security footprint we had in America versus El Salvador. Why would we have had that security footprint in America that we saw in El Salvador? Because who would have imagined that a judge would go into his courthouse on a Saturday, publicly expose, sabotage this operation, publicly expose it and then order planes to turn around, right?
I always joke that Judge Boasberg is not qualified to be an air traffic controller under the prior administration because he's not a black transgender woman. So I don't know how he thought he could have ordered this, but he did it anyway. It's unbelievable. It was not only so lawless, it's dangerous. It put American and allied lives in danger. It harmed the president's ability to conduct foreign affairs.
Why would another leader want to take the tremendous risk of taking these terrorists and gangbangers into his country if a judge is going to expose it and then make him look like an idiot because he's standing there with hundreds of people awaiting these terrorists and they don't show up, right? I mean it was so dangerous what this judge did. This is why, at the Article III Project, we're calling for this judge's impeachment. I've never done that before.
I've never as a lawyer, an officer of the court, I've never said, I've never told someone to ignore an order. I very publicly said, the president should ignore this order from this judge, and I've also never called for a judge's impeachment like this, and I'm doing it with this judge because this is so dangerous what these judges are doing. They're radical judges who are trying to sabotage the president because they have political and policy disagreements.
At this point, though, I mean, if you look at the track record from the very first moment Trump was elected, the last time, I mean it really doesn't surprise me that they will do anything possible to stop him.
Yeah, they tried to bankrupt him. They tried to throw him in prison four times. They tried to take him off the ballot. They tried to take off his head. Of course they will. They'll do anything.
So I mean turning the planes, ordering the planes to come around. I mean, that doesn't surprise me that they would do that. Remember the ban that Trump put on the first time around. They stopped that, especially when it comes to the immigration issue, because it goes to the heart of the invasion of this country. It goes to the heart of the globalist war on sovereignty and borders and sovereign nations, individual sovereignty, national sovereignty.
I mean, this is really one of the core tenets of their strategy and they're going to defend it at every cost, and it's also one that's pretty easy for them to defend. That plays well for them in certain areas, because right now, what they're arguing is that you have no proof that these people are Tren de Aragua.
You've got people. I've seen some of them, besides their Tren de Aragua, tattoos all over their bodies.
Well, I mean, some of them have the tattoos all over their bodies, but some of them don't, right? And so there's attorneys representing some of these people that have posted pictures of them online showing look at this sensitive guy and he's doing this and doing that, and there's no proof that he is a member of Trenderagua. So now you face this.
They're now arguing that and I think a judge didn't a judge just rule in their favor on this that you can't remove people without due process, that they get to know, if they're accused of being a gang member, what the basis is for that.
Sure, there's minimum process. But here's the problem Judge Boasberg was not the right judge to do this. The relief you seek is habeas relief in Texas. That's where these gangbangers were flying from. So you go to Texas and you file a habeas petition with that judge in Texas. They didn't want to do that.
They wanted to go to a radical judge in DC who did not have jurisdiction over this case, because they knew that radical judge in DC is going to side with bringing terrorists Is going to do whatever they want. Yeah terrorists and gangbangers back into America, right. And so there is due process. There is a process that you go through.
It's a habeas process in the state from which you're being deported, not running to Bozo the Clown, bozberg the Clown in DC and having him expose an ongoing military operation and turn around planes, or try to turn around planes as the black trans air traffic controller from the DC courthouse.
So where does that particular fight stand right now?
The DC Circuit panel just heard the emergency stay. They sided with Judge Boasberg and so it's going to go to the Supreme Court. And again I would say, and the judges just clearly got it wrong they think that this was a policy change that would be subject to the APA, the Administrative Procedures Act, that would allow the DC court to hear this, which is just total nonsense.
This is a habeas claim that should have been decided by a Texas judge and so the Supreme Court's going to have to decide this. And I would say to the Supreme Court if you let these activist judges sabotage the duly elected president of the United States, who just won a broad electoral mandate, on the fact that he's going to protect our country, which is very clear he has the right to do, including a recent Supreme Court.
The Constitution is clear on that.
Yeah, the Article II of the Constitution, along with the Supreme Court's 2018 ruling in Trump versus Hawaii. That makes it very clear. The president is acting very lawfully here. If the Supreme Court does not stop these activist judges from sabotaging the president, he's going to start ignoring these orders, as he should. And then I would say to the Supreme Court how are you going to enforce it? Are you going to send your law clerks to go enforce your orders?
Because if the president ignores your orders because they're lawless and dangerous, then it is a disaster for the Supreme Court, it is a disaster for the federal judiciary, it's a disaster for the country, because when the Supreme Court loses its legitimacy, it loses everything.
So this would be catastrophic.
Yes, no question. And the chief justice needs to understand that, whether the Washington Post or the New York Times writes a good or a bad story about him, he needs to understand. This is the red line. If they are going to let activist DC judges tell the president of the United States he cannot deport a foreign terrorist out of our country, he's going to ignore those orders, as he should, and then the Supreme Court's going to lose everything.
The counter-argument, though, is how do you know they're terrorists? And are you sure they're terrorists, and what is that based on? And you're saying that's a habeas issue that should have been addressed in Texas, but they didn't give anyone an opportunity to address that in Texas, did they?
Well, they could have filed a habeas petition in Texas. They filed it in DC. Why couldn't they have filed it in Texas? Which they should have if they were following the law Because they knew that in Texas you have judges who actually follow the law.
Yeah, as opposed to Judge Boesberg, who's an activist. Yeah, they had time to file in DC.
Why didn't they have time to file in Texas?
But it's halted the deportations right. I mean they're not doing any more of them. Maybe, Mike, I mean.
I'm just a private citizen. I I mean, I'm just a private citizen, I don't know.
Okay, well, it appears, it appears publicly to have halted the deportations. At this point, I mean certainly, if there's any more for of Trenda Aragua, which you know for is a terrorist organization now actually right? So it's, it's, it's not being released publicly.
I would say this Isn't it amazing that, after the Biden Justice Department made January 6th the biggest law enforcement operation of all time and spent four years hunting down every grandma who trespassed and took selfies on January 6th, and these judges let these January 6th defendants get persecuted yes, persecuted, under the Supreme Court's Fisher ruling, when the Justice Department politicized, weaponized, contorted a post-Enron obstruction of justice statute intended to go after
corporate fraud?
You mean the 1512 charge?
To go after political enemies. They used a felony obstruction charge to go after Trump supporters on January 6th.
¶ Judicial Sabotage and Due Process Rights
These judges did not give a damn about these due process rights of these defendants. They let these people suffer in jail before their trials for months and months and months.
They let them get abused in the DC. They violated their Fifth Amendment rights, their Seventh Amendment rights, their Eighth Amendment rights. I mean not one of them got a fair trial, not one of them got a speedy trial, not one of them got. You know, they violated their Fourth Amendment rights with these by raiding their homes with SWAT teams for nonviolent misdemeanor offenses, yeah.
I mean and Boesberg is one of these. So I don't want to hear Boesberg cry about due process rights of foreign terrorists who are kidnapping, robbing, raping, torturing and murdering Americans. I don't give a damn about those people.
He didn't give a damn about due process rights of Americans.
Trump supporters when Boesberg the clown starts caring about the January 6th defendants and how their due process rights, their constitutional rights, were clearly violated. Yes, according to the Supreme Court's Fisher ruling, they were persecuted. When these DC judges start caring about Americans, then I'll start caring about Tren de Aragua and MS-13 due process rights and tell them I don't give a damn.
So what about the argument? And you talk about impeachment right. What about the argument that they're not going to get impeached?
Well, I don't. This is where I differ from a lot of Republicans. I don't care if they get impeached and removed. I want the process to be the punishment. I want them to spend their time defending themselves in an impeachment proceeding instead of moonlighting as an air traffic controller and ordering the president to turn around planes full of terrorists.
It sounds like, after they persecuted Trump supporters for four years and Trump pardoned the Trump supporters and dismissed their cases, these judges in DC are bored Right, and so let's keep them occupied with impeachment instead of where they think they can go, sabotage the president. Right, you know it's when they're idle they do dangerous things.
So how do you address the argument that no one is above the law and judges have a responsibility and they have a right to rule on these things, and that this is what justifies the accusation that Trump is sort of a fascist dictator because he's trying to disregard the judicial branch?
But this is not judicial review. This is judicial sabotage. These judges have judicial power. They have all the judicial power. The Supreme Court has the judicial power, Congress has the legislative power, the president has the executive power and the president and the president alone. When judges are exercising judicial power that is, deciding cases or controversies of the parties before their court with redressable claims, that's the judicial power right.
Their judicial power is not to issue temporary restraining orders, sabotaging the president's core Article 2 powers. It's not to issue nationwide injunctions based upon parties who are not before the court. They don't have that Article 3 power to do that. So this is not judicial power they're exercising. This is judicial sabotage. They're stealing Congress's legislative power by issuing nationwide injunctions, essentially legislating from the bench.
They're stealing the president's Article 2 executive power when they're telling the president that he can't do a, for example, a national security review of foreign aid $2 billion in foreign aid to make sure that we're not funding Hamas terrorists who are killing Americans under the guise of Gazan humanitarian relief. To make sure that we're not funding transgender mice research.
Didn't they find that we were? Yeah, we were doing exactly that.
¶ Judicial Sabotage and Executive Power
And this judge, ali, on the DC court. He just got confirmed in the lame duck session, barely got confirmed. He was the bottom of the barrel for Biden's judicial nominees. He's still a Canadian citizen to this day. I don't know how you could be a federal judge and be a foreign citizen he is. They bragged that he was the first Muslim and the first Arab on the DC federal court and he issued a temporary restraining order. That's supposed to stop something from happening.
He issued a temporary restraining order ordering the president to send out $2 billion in foreign aid at USAID against the president's national security review, and he put a timeline on it. Yes, it's unbelievable. And the Supreme Court let him get away with this, because Justice Amy Coney Barrett and the Chief Justice Justice Amy Coney Barrett's a law professor from Notre Dame and I always say that she's a rattled law professor with her head up her ass. She thinks that.
Oh well, he called it a temporary restraining order and under my civil procedure exam and my civil procedure manual, I can't. Those are not appealable. Well, he might've called it a temporary restraining order, but it's not. It was clearly an injunction, a permanent injunction, because they're sending $2 billion out the door, right and so- and has that money gone? Yeah, they sent the money out the door. That's.
The issue is, how much money do we just send to Ghazan humanitarian relief that's going to fund Hamas killing Americans?
Isn't that material support for terrorists? You would think so.
Which is another crime. You would think so.
Okay, so what do you do about that?
That's a good question. I mean what I think needs to happen. Remember there, they have a lot going on in the Trump administration. They're, they're trying to do fire A lot of people, cancel a lot of programs, cancel a lot of grants. Their people are just getting confirmed by the Senate, it's. You know, they're, they're at war.
It's going to be a bumpy road for the next four years, but particularly the next six months, until we get through these activist judges with their sabotage, and we're going to work through this. I'm going to make damn sure that that happens.
So what's going to happen in this case with Judge Ali and the USAID issue? I mean, that's been to the Supreme Court and they sided with him.
They sided with him on the emergency docket on the temporary restraining order, but not the issue, not the substance.
Not the substance of the issue, not the substance, not the substance of the issue.
At the end of the day, trump's going to win all these cases.
How long is it going to take?
That's the issue. The issue is if they are continuing to sabotage the president's. Let's just put it this way what if Congress told the Chief Justice that the Supreme Court can't exercise their judicial power for two weeks? Or two months that would be unacceptable, right, that would be unacceptable. The chief justice would strike that down immediately. So how the hell can a judge tell the president for two weeks or two months or even two seconds that he can't exercise his executive power?
they can't do this, and that's the point of but they argue that they're a check, that there are checks and balances built into the system and judicial power is a check on overreach or misuse of executive power.
But that's the issue he's not overreaching and misusing his executive power. They are trying to sabotage him because they have policy and political disagreements with President Trump. So these judges are trying to stop him over political impulse. Look, he's the president, he can deport terrorists. He's the president, he can review foreign aid.
Does he have to prove that they're terrorists?
Does he have to prove that they're terrorists? He has to provide a due process, which they did, and then there's habeas relief. After that, they went through a process. If you read the court's filings, there was affidavits submitted from various government officials, the Secretary of State. There is a process they use.
And I read those and it's similar to what they used to do at the border when people came over, instead of just letting them into the country.
Yeah, exactly. Well, it's worse than that, instead of giving them a CB1 app and putting them on airplanes and putting them up at four-star hotels and then not getting rid of them after they rape murder, torture, kidnap and giving them phones and all the other things they did. But okay, and let's add that why would the Democrats want MS-13 and Trend Day Aragua in America if it's not subversion?
Why would you want the worst terrorists and criminals in the Western Hemisphere in America and then not only bring them here and let them cause chaos and not get rid of them, but actually go out of their way to stop the president of the United States and try to turn around the planes when they're in? Why would they do that other than subversion stage and try to turn around the planes when they're when they're? Why would, why would they?
do that other than subversion? Well, I mean, the answer lies in the fact why would you, why would you let a guy out of prison 21 times when he was, you know, accused of one violent crime after another?
Because they want the chaos. The Marxists need the chaos. This is part of their plan.
Well, and why would you ship them to swing districts across the country if you didn't want them to vote?
Yeah well, I always say let's make a deal with the Democrats. Instead of bringing in 15 million illegal immigrants and having them overwhelm our schools and hospitals and having them take over our social services and having these criminals take over our communities, like they did in Colorado, and rape and murder and torture people, let's just say to the Democrats we'll make this easy for you. We know that you're trying to import so you can get more people on the census for more federal funding.
We know you're trying to import these illegals so you can have them vote. Why don't we just mail the ballots to them in Central America so we can just avoid the crime and chaos that results from the Democrats mass importing 15 million new voters chaos that results from the Democrats, mass importing 15 million new voters.
Mr Davis, I want to go back to something that you said about judicial sabotage of Article 2 power. Is that not subversion? Yes, and sedition right, which falls under treason and sedition.
Well, I mean, if you can, well, I have to be careful because I'm still a lawyer and I don't want to get disbarred yet.
But if you are a judge and you're going out of your way to sabotage the president of the United States and issue temporary restraining orders that aren't temporary, to issue nationwide injunctions that are essentially legislation, and you're trying to sabotage the will of the American people, who elected the president to go after waste, fraud and abuse, to secure our border and deport dangerous terrorists.
That's subversion.
That seems like subversion to me.
And what does the statute say?
So it depends on the statute.
¶ Conspiracy Against Rights and Treason
There are conspiracy statutes. You talked about seditious conspiracy. There's conspiracy statutes. You talked about seditious conspiracy. There's conspiracy against rights. There are other statutes, like the treason statutes when you're working with foreign enemies and there are two witnesses. You're working with foreign enemies to undermine the president.
Would that be like Christopher Steele, the British former spy that was working with the Clinton campaign, and Mark Elias, perkins, coie and Nellie Orr, whose husband, bruce Orr, was at the Justice Department? I mean, would that be like working with foreign enemies?
It could be, and I would certainly expect, if it hasn't already, that there's going to be an investigation on Crossfire Hurricane. That's going to go back to the beginning.
And I would say to any of these lawyers, any of these prosecutors, any of these federal agents, judges and any other government official or anyone on the outside of governments who's working with government officials to politicize and weaponize intel agencies and law enforcement to go after your political enemies for non-crimes. That's conspiracy against rights at a minimum, at a minimum, at a minimum, and that's how you open the investigation under 18 USC Section 241.
And all of those people who could have participated in that conspiracy, I would say to lawyer up.
There's also Section 115, right.
Well, which one's 115? You're a better lawyer than I am today.
No, I'm not, no, I'm not, but I think 115 is treason and sedition, and I just keep coming back to that because, first of all, it's a. It isn't I mean, it's a. It's just so frustrating that we have watched clear subversion over and over again. Even if you know, regardless of if they were doing this to Joe Biden or Obama or Clinton, I would have to say the same thing, because if you follow the principle if you're not following the politics of it, but you're following the principle of it.
You can't allow those kind of activities to take place. You can't allow people in counterintelligence and the FBI to be deciding to be building insurance policies against the candidate they don't want in the election. You can't have the presidential candidate in an election working with Russian intelligence to create a fake dossier that a foreign spy brings in that you have met, by the way, john McCain.
Republican members of Congress carry this over to your law enforcement agencies as participating in this conspiracy. A document that nobody can verify, the unverified dossier. And yet your head of you know the CIA, john Brennan at the time, attaches it, you know, to congressional reports in order to make sure. I mean, this is all part of the conspiracy.
And these people, if they're not held fully accountable for all of that, like forget going down for mail fraud or lying under oath or whatever, they need to be held accountable for a seditious conspiracy for treason, because that's what they did.
They betrayed their country because that's what they did. They betrayed their country. I would say that crossfire hurricane is the biggest scandal in American history. Hillary Clinton again got caught with her illegal home server, with our nation's secrets, which is espionage. But more problematically was the Clinton Foundation's pay-for-play foreign bribery scheme. She's the Secretary of State. She's doing official acts in exchange for millions of dollars. That's the allegation, right.
And so then they made up the Crossfire Hurricane investigation to cover this up.
And can I just say one thing about that, because it was very frustrating to live through this at the time, because apparently there's not a reporter alive that could actually read the law but just the fact that Hillary Clinton had one server is proof that she broke the law Because, as anyone who works in the government knows, your systems, your classified and your secret classified systems have to be kept secret from your non-classified systems.
So if Hillary Clinton didn't want to break the law, she would have had to have two servers. She would have had to keep the by law. By law, those systems have to be completely separate. You cannot store classified and non-classified information on the same server. It's not allowed.
Unless it's a classified server. Exactly, that's exactly right. And so she got caught with not only espionage but foreign bribery and corruption. She destroyed the server, destroyed evidence, bleach bit the server, took the hammer to the phone, so it's obstruction of justice.
Violated the Federal Records Keeping Act.
Yeah. And so then you say and the reason, the reason-. Lied about everything and the reason they made up crossfire hurricane because they were worried, like they thought they destroyed this evidence, but they were worried it was going to come out before the 2016 election by the Russians. That's why they made up the Russian collusion hoax so they can say you can't believe this story. This is a dirty campaign trick by the Trump campaign. They're colluding with the Russians.
Don't believe this story tricked by the Trump campaign. They're colluding with the Russians. Don't believe this story, and not only don't believe this story but don't report on it.
Do you remember all of that?
You're not allowed to report on it, because then you're promoting Russian propaganda.
Exactly. And you say that sounds so crazy, mike. How could you possibly think that? Well, they did the same thing with Hunter Biden's laptop in 2020. Remember, they had the 51 former intel officials working with the CIA to say that it had all the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign Got the New York Post America's oldest newspaper taken. They took down the New York Post. Not only could the New York Post Off Twitter yeah, took it off the internet. They took the story.
They took the New York Post off the internet. They controlled all the social media so they would not let anyone report that the Bidens were taking foreign bribes and corruption before the 2020 campaign. If the American people would have known about Hunter Biden's laptop and the foreign corruption before 2020, there's no way Joe Biden would have been sitting in that White House.
Okay, but what about if the American people had actually seen Comey James Comey arrested, yeah, or John Brennan or Hillary Clinton or any of these people before the 2020 election even happened? Yeah, I understand it's a COVID war and there's a lot of things that I don't know about and that none of us know about. I get that. It's been very frustrating to have to live through it, not because of politics, but because of principle.
Trump has much better, stronger personnel this time and they're not going to make the mistakes that they made the last time, and that includes at the Justice Department. You're seeing Pam Bondi and Todd Blanche and Emil Bove and others at the Justice Department making very bold moves starting from day one firing people, closing investigations, opening investigations Are they?
firing enough people, because what I hear is the Justice Department, from multiple people, is rife with people who are just going to say yes, ma'am, we need to open an investigation into that. Yes, ma'am, they open the investigation and it goes nowhere. Take the yeah, we need to investigate, open an investigation into that. Yes, ma'am, they open the investigation and it goes nowhere. They stole, they stole, they stole and they misrepresent the evidence. They just they subvert.
It's subversion again and again and again. Pam Bondi's been subverted at the Department of Justice. It's happening to Kash Patel at FBI. It's happening inside the Pentagon I mean Trump is the commander in chief is being subverted and undermined from within by people within those institutions. I mean the agency, the CIA you want to talk about the CIA?
I mean seriously, we're in the midst of an intelligence operation and having a crossfire hurricane wasn't really a law enforcement operation, it was an intelligence operation. So I mean when I say to you, when I raise concerns to you, it's not because Trump is not delivering from day one on. You know almost everything. I mean the man is doing everything humanly possible to drain the swamp and to change a system that has been put in place over. I mean more than a hundred years.
I mean you than 100 years. I mean you could argue it even goes back further than that. But really you know the 1913 Federal Reserve Act. I mean the creation of the Federal Reserve, the insanity of the Federal Reserve. Let me see that they print money that they loan to US, that US citizens have to pay taxes to pay back that loan. I mean, what the hell is that? That's nonsense.
I would say this Remember, there are 4 million executive branch employees. There are only 4,000 political appointees, and a lot of those political appointees have to go through the Senate confirmation process. So political appointees to careers, a lot of those political appointees have to go through the Senate confirmation process. So political appointees to careers is a thousand to one, right. They're just outmanned and outgunned.
And of those federal employees, look at how many people are Trump supporters? Not very many, right. These are people who work every second of every day to undermine and subvert the president of the. United States.
So how the hell is he going to deal with that?
That's the issue I mean. This is it's going to be a slog for the next four years, but he's, he's going to. He has to win these early cases at the courts. That establishes his core article to executive powers to fire people.
Because otherwise it's going to be the same play over and over and over again If he does not resolve this issue right now. This is the issue that crippled him the first time around and was never dealt with. And if it's not dealt with this time, it is a bad sign.
Yeah, this is why I am fighting so hard, as one of these Trump didn't have the outside group supporting him the first time, like he does now.
But that's another thing that doesn't seem to happen. I mean, every time if you look at the left, there's a pop-up shop group. I mean, they created pop-up groups just to protest Kavanaugh's hearing, right? They literally do pop-up shops for protests. Whatever the issue happens to be, they'll come up with 50 of them so they don't have to set up a 5013C and go through all that paperwork. They just do it under someone else's 5013C status.
And you look at the right and it's pathetic in comparison, and so that's the issues.
We have to get President Trump through these crucial early court battles. Once the Supreme Court steps in and sides with President Trump on these, which I think they will, on the merits, I think it's going to be at least six to three on these cases. It should be more, but the three left-wing justices are just going to side against Trump almost every time?
Oh, you mean Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts. Is that what you mean by some of those left-wing justices? Oh, and maybe Kavanaugh, those justices that apparently have no balls.
They do have balls, but I think they're in the Justice Sotomayor's purse.
Yeah, apparently so.
So, yeah, I hear what you're saying. I do think, look, this is what you have to do at the Supreme Court with these conservatives, and it's pathetic. You have to do this, what you have to do at the Supreme Court with these conservatives, and it's pathetic. You have to do this, but we have to do it. We did this on presidential immunity at the Article III project.
Not only do we have to help President Trump get the best lawyers to make the best legal arguments like John Sauer, who's going to be the Solicitor General of the United States, was Trump's lawyer and made the presidential immunity legal argument that everyone laughed and said was so stupid. Community legal argument that everyone laughed and said was so stupid then you have to make the political case, and that's what we do at the Article III Project. We help President Trump find the best lawyers.
We help him make the political case because you not only with conservatives you have to have the law right and you have to have the politics right. The law being right is not enough for a lot of these conservatives because, as you said, they don't have balls.
They really don't. What's up with that?
That's. I would say that the biggest cowards on the planet tend to be white Republican lawyers, particularly in Washington DC, because they're so scared of being called racist and sexist and homophobic and transphobic and whatever phobic, and so that's how the left cows them.
Well, you're a white Republican lawyer.
And that's right, and I don't give a shit.
Why, why don't you?
care. Like I said, I grew up with red hair. I grew up with red hair and a face for radio. I don't care. I don't care what people think about me Born where I was born in Des Moines, iowa, right, so I do not care and I was raised by liberal parents, right. I was the Alex P Keaton in my family and the reason I am conservative. My parents were like these do-good liberals and they found the two majority minority schools in Des Moines, iowa.
It's a refugee, resettlement state and there are a couple schools in Des Moines where it's mostly black and mostly Asian right, and so they sought out those schools. They worked in those schools, they were very involved with those schools and so I would go with them to these events.
And I saw at a very early age that these government programs that are supposed to help these poor, oftentimes minority kids get ahead in life actually trap them in intergenerational poverty and I thought that was disgusting and I used to think these are just liberals who mean well and are just misguided Right, poor execution.
Good intent, but poor execution.
But now I think that there are a lot of good liberals who still believe that, but they're controlled by the Marxists. The Marxists want-.
They've taken over.
The Marxists want people trapped in poverty. They want particularly poor black people trapped in poverty. They need a coalition of victims, right, and under Trump they ran out of victims because everyone was getting ahead under Trump, so they had to create new victims. They had to create new victims. They had to create BLM. They had to create COVID. They had to create chaos, right.
¶ Origin of BLM and Lawfare Puppetmasters
How did BLM come along? I mean, black Americans were doing pretty well under President Trump. The economy was thriving. These inner city schools, the Republicans were providing opportunities, lifelines for these poor black kids trapped in these government schools to go to get a good education, to go to a private school, like these politicians send their own kids to. We had crime down, we had unemployment down. It was going very well and then-.
Also, Trump did that program with black universities. Yeah, exactly. Then he had the opportunity zones.
Yeah, the black Americans were doing well under President Trump.
Well, that's why so many of them voted for him the second time around.
Well, that's why the Democrats did the BLM riots. They saw the polling. Look black Americans make up 13% of the population. They vote 95% Democrat right. If you change that number from 95% to 85%, that's a 1.3% swing in the overall election right. That changes the outcome of elections. So people say, well, you're never going to win the black vote, you don't need to. If you win 15% of the black vote instead of 5%, you're going to win. The president and the Democrats knew this.
This is why they ran the BLM rights. They saw that President Trump's support among black voters was probably at 20%.
And there's also this history. There there's historic precedent, because Lenin actually sent his emissaries in the early 1900s. He sent his emissaries across the Western world to identify fishes in various societies. So in Algeria, for example, it was Islam, it was religion. In America it was race. And so that's why, historically, if you look throughout it, even in South Africa, why have struggles for civil rights, for black people always been so closely aligned with Marxism?
Well, that's an age-old strategy where they co-opted the struggle for equal rights and justice and all that.
And you know this from your time growing up in South Africa. Of course you saw it was supposed to be equality. Now you have these Marxists hunting down and killing white farmers in South Africa. Kill the boars, right. Marxists pretend like they're something they're not.
They pretend like they believe in equality and due process and free speech and all of those things they rely on deception yes, they rely on deception because if, for example, hugo chavez in venezuela, if he told everybody oh, you know when I run out, when I, when I finish stealing the oil money, when I finish stealing everything else, you know I'm just going to keep going. My family is going to be richer than ever and 80% of you are going to live below the poverty line.
In fact, you're going to be scratching through trash cans looking for food and, oh, by the way, you're not going to have any freedom or rights. We're going to disappear. Tens of thousands of people every year. Some of you will just disappear in prison and die. We're going to rape with impunity and we're going to kill whoever we want, and you're not going to be able to do anything about it. No one would vote for that.
Yeah, nobody would vote for that. That's why they lie about it.
They have to lie about it, so they have to pretend it's about making sure. And it works as an idea because, ironically, as human beings, if you say to any kid, well, do you think everybody should have an education and a home, nobody should be homeless, nobody should suffer, I mean, what would you say to that? Yes, that sounds like a great system. I believe in that. But what they don't do is what my dad would do.
I never forget after school we would go to this one little cafe sometimes, sometimes, and I would get a toasted scone with butter. And my dad said did you see what that costs? He said to me the one day I said why do they charge so much for that? Right, it's just one scone.
And then my dad went through the whole process of the labor, that it took, the ingredients, that it took, the transporting of it, and he went through, he broke down all the costs of what it takes to get to make that item, and then and and and everything that it went through before it reached the table and why it costs that much.
And next time you said I want two scones.
Well, I never forgot it. I never forgot it, and I never wanted to be a business person because of it, cause I was like well, I don't want to deal with that, I'm just going to be, I'm just going to be a loud mouth.
I'm a loud mouth on Twitter as a lawyer Cause I can't do math and so I don't want to do, I don't want to do business stuff. But it's you know, I, I hear you. That's the. You're talking about deception. They're not going to show who they really are off the mask. They got overconfident. They like with the BLM, with the Antifa, with the Hamas rights, they got too confident.
Their hand was forced. Yeah, their hand was forced by the things that you described, like when you, when you really have people thriving economically. Every, you know, everyone knows the economy is always, you know, one of the number one issues in any election, right? So they had to resort to those things because Trump would have just walked into office in a landslide, and so they had to create the perception of chaos. They had to manufacture the chaos.
I mean, that's how the Nazis got the Chancellor of Bavaria, I mean Germany to hand over the keys, right, they created chaos, but you know Germany to hand over the keys, right, they created chaos, but you know, mike.
I want to the COVID lockdowns. I mean, think about what they did with the COVID lockdowns.
Well, that was just outright theft.
They wanted to destroy our economy, to destroy Trump's presidency. They wanted to make us miserable, to chase Trump out of office.
Well, they really needed that to change the election laws so they could use the mail-in ballots to steal it.
Yeah, and what was so great about changing illegally, unconstitutionally changing election laws in violation?
Oh, another crime they got away with.
Exactly in violation of the elections clause. Remember, with COVID. Somehow COVID, not only does it spread from human to human, but it somehow changes your signature, so they got rid of signature. Not only did they go to all mail ballots, but then they got rid of signature verification because COVID changes your signature, apparently.
So yeah, apparently.
Remember they turned it down where signature verification was meaningless, so you can just scribble anything you want it on the affidavit and send it in your mail.
Yes, you just have to look at signature verification in a court of law in a criminal case. And then you look at what they do in the elections and it's a joke. Yeah, yeah, it's literally a joke. Okay, but something I want to ask you about who's behind the lawfare? It doesn't just happen.
Who do I think? Well, I know that Norm Eisen puts himself out there very publicly.
And can you explain?
who he is. He is a former Obama top lawyer. He's a buddy of Obama's. He's a wealthy guy in DC and he puts himself out there as the puppet master of these lawyers, of these plaintiffs, of these agents, who kind of is the mastermind of this lawfare?
Well, he took over at CREW, right Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics that organization in DC and CREW was responsible for many I mean countless lawsuits against Trump, including trying to take Trump off the ballot in Colorado, unconstitutionally Right Financing those efforts. He also worked with David Brock, who was head of Media Matters for America, who also was at CREW for a while but who founded Media Matters for America. The two of them created the 65 Project.
Yep.
And-.
¶ Corruption and Accountability in Law
They target lawyers, Republican lawyers, to cow them with bar complaints.
They threaten their bar licenses.
They try to disbar them.
They do disbar them.
It's amazing, tried to disbar me yet yeah, why is that? I don't know. Try it, see what happens. I mean, they probably know that I will sue their asses if they do that and make their lives miserable, because I'm not your typical Republican lawyer who's going to cow to them.
Why do you need a bar license to practice law, I mean when you graduate from college. Why isn't that enough?
Like law school?
Yeah, because the lawyers want to control their own profession, right, just like doctors want to control their own but it's a British thing, isn't it, the bar?
Well, what they do in Britain which is what they should do is they have, like a you graduate from school and then you go be an apprentice for a lawyer for a couple of years, a barrister, and then you're a lawyer, and that's what they should be doing in America.
Who created the bar?
It was the Brits. I don't know why we have the bar system in America, because it just allows leftists to control the legal system in America.
Well, and look what they've done to Rudy Giuliani. Yeah, I mean-.
Destroyed the man. Destroyed the man For what? Because he dared to question the stolen election right. I mean-.
And before that, because he exposed what they were doing in Ukraine.
I mean they really hate him. They've tried to destroy the man. Look.
Is he going to be restored?
Because he should be. He should be Like Jeff Clark. They did the same thing to my friend, jeff Clark. Jeff Clark was a Justice Department official who was advising the president, and the Democrats didn't like the advice that this lawyer gave to his client and so they tried to destroy his lives. They indicted him down in Georgia. They tried to take away they're still trying to take away his law license there.
Look, um, I push very hard for Jeff Clark to get back into the Trump administration and he's there now. He's in the white house office of management and budget. He has a really important job there, uh, to to manage the regulations across the entire federal government. I would say to these Democrats for four years you guys were the hunters and now for the next four years, you're going to be the hunted legally, politically and financially.
Okay, but see people call that retribution.
I think retribution is a very crucial part of justice, because it restores the victims and it's a powerful deterrent to make sure that this never happens again. So you can call it retribution, you can call it accountability, you can call it law enforcement, you can call it whatever the hell you want, but I'm all for it.
Norm Eisen just had his security clearance stripped. What does that mean? What does that do to him?
well, it means he can't have matters with the federal government as a lawyer with clients where those matters require security clearance. So a lot of the work that he does for corporations that are trying to navigate government rules and regulations where you need a security clearance, you can't do that anymore.
And when you look at a guy like that, because now he has a blog with that awful woman, jennifer Rubin, that's a woman, yeah, sometimes it's hard to tell. I will admit she's got a face for radio, that's for sure. I'm not supposed to say that kind of thing, but it is true. Check it out.
Like me, like me, like me.
She has a face for radio, but I think what's so unpleasant about the two of them is just the. I mean, first of all, it's a constant stream of lies, but then it's also just this hatred. Right, this Trump derangement syndrome was a good term to come up with, because there are some of these people that are involved in this where it's just relentless, and what is frustrating is seeing that they just constantly get away with one.
I mean with subversion, because launching over 150 lawsuits, determining in advance that this is what your strategy is going to be, we're going to stop everything they try to do. We're going to try to stop with a lawsuit. Yeah, is that a crime?
When you are weaponizing government agencies, whether it's intel agencies or law enforcement or other agencies, to go after your political opponents for non-crimes. That is conspiracy against rights under 18 usc section 241 at a minimum, along with many other potential crimes. And I would say this they were able to get away with this in the first term because president trump had uh, weak and dumb people in key posts. He doesn't have that this time.
They're not going to be able to get away with this. These judges are sabotaging the president. They're working with these activist lawyers and activist plaintiffs and activist judges are working together to sabotage the president after he won this electoral mandate. It's going to work in the short term. It's not going to work in the long term. It's not going to work in the long term.
The Supreme Court will stop this and if the Supreme Court does not stop this, it's going to light the federal judiciary's legitimacy on fire.
What can you do about the senior executive service, which is that layer of bureaucracy that is kind of a law unto itself, that is outside of the oversight of Congress, that decides its own salaries and determines whether or not people can be fired and hired? I mean, it is literally the deep state. It's not the whole deep state, but it is a core component of the deep state.
Yeah, I think we need to step back and just have a broader discussion, because it's so important here. People need to understand.
¶ America’s Sovereignty and Political Swamp
Then, america, the difference between America and Great Britain from which we escaped. Right In Great Britain, there's God and then there's a sovereign king or queen, and then that monarch gives power to their subjects through documents like the Magna Carta. So we have a sovereign king or queen and then we get the crumbs as the subject, whatever the king or queen wants us to have. Right In America, it is a radically different concept. We have God and then we have we, the people.
We are the sovereign, we have the power, we, the people, we, the people, we are the sovereign, we have the power. We, the people. We lend power to governments through our constitution. Our US constitution is a loan agreement, so we, the people, loan our federal government's specific, enumerated and divided powers and then whatever powers are not specifically enumerated or mentioned in the constitution belongs to the states and we, the people, and the 10th amendment confirms that.
So we give the congress the legislative power. Under article one, the most powerful power is the legislative power. We divide that between the house and the senate and 535 different members. The executive power, all executive power belongs to the president. He runs the executive branch, and then all executive power belongs to the president. He runs the executive branch, and then the judicial power belongs to the Supreme Court and whatever lower courts that Congress creates.
That's the Article III judicial power right. That's how our system worked until about 90 years ago, and then 90 years ago, during the FDR administration, the Supreme Court was striking down FDR's New Deal programs because it wasn't allowed by the Constitution. They might've been great ideas, but it was not allowed by the Constitution, right. And so the Supreme Court was saying this is not in the Constitution, you do not have this power, you can't do this program.
Fdr threatened to pack the Supreme Court and it worked. He threatened to pack the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court changed its jurisprudence and essentially turned the Constitution on its head. Folded yeah, folded. The Constitution went from a shield that protected us from government to a sword the government uses to come after us. And the Supreme Court essentially ruled that unless the Constitution says the government, the federal government, does not have the power, it has the power.
Switched it. Instead of the federal government only having the powers that are mentioned in the Constitution, the Supreme Court essentially said, under the Commerce Clause, unless the Constitution precludes the federal government from doing it, it has that power.
And then not only did the federal government get all these powers that belong to states and the people, they consolidated all the legislative power, a lot of the legislative power and a lot of the judicial power, into unelected bureaucrats in the executive branch. And then they separated those bureaucrats and made them essentially untouchable by the president.
So you have power that doesn't belong to the federal government, power that belongs to Congress, power that belongs to the Supreme Court, all in these unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats who the president can't hire, the president can't fire, the president can't control. That is the definition of tyranny. If you're a fascist, that's what you would want.
You would want the Tony Fauci's of the world to make all the decisions in your life, like we saw during COVID, where we had to be six feet away from people, even though that was not based at all on the science and it really disrupted our lives, particularly kids' lives, that they couldn't be in schools, particularly poor black kids who Democrats pretend to care about.
Those kids were not on Zoom classrooms in their homes, they were not being fed, they were not being treated properly, they were being neglected, abused. They're already poor, they're already behind. They're being abused and neglected because of these COVID lockdowns. Do you think that the Tony Fauci's of the world, the elite, cared? No, they wanted this misery. The cloth mask mandates, cloth masks do not work.
The only thing that would stop COVID from spreading is if you had the surgical masks the 95s on your face, perfectly on your face. Then you could stop the spread of COVID.
That don't work anyway in a normal environment.
They do not work.
They work for a short period of time, like if you're a surgeon doing something.
If you're a surgeon, in a controlled environment.
Right, and you use it and you throw it out, yes, and then you wash your hands, but taking it on and off and this and that and reusing it and all that nonsense Between bites and sips. Yeah, none of that works. But going back to okay that layer of unelected bureaucrats who are not answerable, that's the senior executive service.
That's who Trump is going after right now. He's firing those people. He's getting rid of their protections. He's closing down agencies. Remember we have to take out the lawyers. We have to take out the deep state operatives. You take out those people first and that's how you can bring long-term change. You have to take out those pawns. You have to take out the legal pawns at the law firms.
You have to take out these career SES pawns in the executive branch, the people who are funding Hamas terrorists killing Americans under the guise of Ghazan relief, the people who are funding transgender mice research and Durka Durka Lantz. These are the people you have to take out if you're going to bring the changes.
Look Okay. So how does he take them out, though? Because what we're seeing right now, say the Department of Education right, created by an act of Congress, therefore has to be. I mean, you can turn off the lights, you can get rid of everybody, you can shut down its operations, but doesn't it take Congress to get rid of it.
Yes, if it was created by statute, you need to get rid of it by statute, but the statute doesn't say you have to have 100,000 employees, for example. Maybe you can do it with 1,000 instead of 100,000.
Right, but can he get rid of it? I mean, would this Congress I mean he has a majority would this Congress actually vote to do that?
Would they Possibly? You have to build the political case and you'd have to do it through reconciliation, where you only needed 51 votes in the Senate instead of 60 votes is what you normally need through.
Because you're not going to get 60 votes.
No way. But look, I've always said this. I think that over like I started the Article 3 project because I saw the void on the right for people who had insider knowledge, who were willing to fight like a thick-skinned monkey like me, right. So emphasis on thick skin. But what I think needs to happen is we always talk about draining the swamp. Well, guess what? The reptiles are not going to drain the swamp, congress-.
Their own swamp. No, they're not going to do that.
Why would? The political branches will never drain the swamp. Why would the reptiles drain the swamp?
That's why they never vote on term limits. They talk about it, they draft it and they never vote on it.
So this is how you're going to have to get rid of these departments and agencies it has to be through the courts and it's going to have to be over 20 years. Now what Trump is 20 years. It's going to take 20 years to do, but what?
Trump what about an emergency declaration? War powers?
I don't know if that would work, but I would say this what Trump is doing with Elon Musk to disrupt right now is speeding up that process from 20 years to four years. It's hugely important. I didn't think that anyone would have the courage to do what Trump and Elon Musk are doing.
And they're doing it, and it's going to be chaotic, it's going to break a lot of China, it's going to cause a lot of disruption, it's going to cause a lot of chaos, we're going to lose some cases from time to time, but overall, this is speeding up the dismantling of the executive branch from 20 years to four years.
Does he even have four years? If, for example, what's going to happen in the midterms? Because if they could steal the 2020 election, they could steal the midterms Absolutely and people didn't pay attention to a lot of the down ballot races in 2024. There was a lot of cheating that went on. I mean there's non-citizens that have voted in multiple states.
Yeah. That's why, if you deport 15 million illegal immigrants, they can't vote yeah. But they're not even close to 15 million. I hear you.
They don't have a snowball's chance in how the pace they're going right now. They don't have a snowball's chance of getting close to 15 million. Well, I mean they got the border.
Well, I mean, they got the border. Remember how many people were coming across the border?
Yeah, they stopped the bleeding.
Yeah, and then now people are even starting to self-deport, right, so that's a good thing. Once you go after the employers in America and say that if you employ these illegal immigrants, we're going to charge you with harboring illegal aliens under our federal criminal statutes. That ends the problem overnight. If they have nowhere to work, they're going to go home, right. So a lot of them, a lot of them.
So look I mean a lot of them are here doing criminal activities. I don't mean to say that's not to disparage good people, because there are many good people.
No, I hear you A lot of them are cartels.
But they used good people. I mean the CCP, the Venezuelans, the Iranians, I mean every adversary. The United States has used good people as a cover to insert foreign military organizations into this country. Hackers, spies, I mean you name it, and I mean the Chinese PLA alone. People's Liberation Army has more than 250,000 trained uniformed soldiers inside this country, and they used good people you know to get in right.
Yeah, I used to have. I used to be kind of weak soft on immigration. I used to say, well, you know, maybe they came here illegally, but you know they're good people and you know they're just coming here to work. I have, after Biden, let this mass invasion over the last four years. I have zero sympathy. I have zero compassion. I want to get anyone who's here illegally. You're a criminal.
Get the hell out of our country, particularly if you're in a Venezuelan gang, tren de Aragua, a foreign terrorist organization, or your MS-13, get them the hell out of our country. I have zero. Joe Biden in the last four years has made it where I have. I will never have compassion again for illegal immigrants who come to our country.
Well, the problem is that they, the globalists and the open borders crowd, took human beings and turned them into a weapon system.
Pawns, they're, pawns, no, they're a weapon system Pawns, they're pawns, no they're a weapon system. Yeah.
They're a weapon that they used. I mean, sometimes people invade with tanks, sometimes they invade with an air force and all the rest of it. They invaded with human beings, and some of those human beings, I mean they're mothers and fathers and children and all the rest of it.
So in a way, it's the perfect weapon system for them, because now it's not the same as going onto the battlefield and removing a bunch of shells or landmines right, no one cares about the landmine, but a lot of people care about the human beings. And now you've got people like Trenderagua, who have brought in groups of 20, 30, 40 young girls from Venezuela to be, you know, we say, trafficked, but the truth is to be raped over and over and over again until their debt is paid off.
And what happens to them? Some of these people have children. You know Some they're getting deported as prostitutes and their children are being left behind. And so they created a mess. It's an absolute mess. It's like trying to do surgery from your body, even if you have a cancer inside you. You have to pull this out because you have an invasion.
You have an entire shadow culture that has been inserted, and you say 15 million, but I talk to a lot of people who think it's more like 18, 20 million. And so it's been inserted into and you say 15 million, but I talk to a lot of people who think it's more like 18, 20 million, and so it's been inserted into your country and it's taken root and now ripping that out is going to be painful and nobody else worldwide has had the courage to do it.
I mean, there are plenty of people in Europe that are looking at this and seeing if Trump can do it, we can do it.
Well, it's even worse in Europe because you have Islamists who have gone into Europe and there's a difference between Muslims and Islamists. Islamists are radicals who want to destroy the West. They want to go into these European countries. It's an invasion. They don't want to assimilate, they want to conquer. They do not want to become part of Europe, they want to destroy Europe.
There's some of that here.
Yeah, there's some of that in America and it's getting worse. Thank God Trump is going to stop and hopefully reverse that. But it's really bad in Europe and the American people need to understand that. If Islamists take over Europe, do we want to keep pledging our NATO support for Europe? Do we want to defend Europe if they've been conquered by Islamists? I don't think so.
I think Europe needs to understand that if they don't take care of their Islamist problem, if they don't get these radical jihadists the hell out of their continent, the American people are not going to have the political will to finance their security. So get your house in order, Europe, because your security, your existence, could crumble pretty fast.
What's the next step in the legal battle in the legal defense of Trump's executive branch? Article 2 power.
I think we have to weather these lawsuits. We have to keep fighting back the Justice Department. As they get people confirmed to these key posts, they'll keep staffing up. They put us on defense for a couple months here, but we're going to be-.
¶ Legal Corruption and Political Resistance
That's annoying.
Yeah, it is annoying, that's sabotage. That's what they did for four years with Crossfire, hurricane the first time.
How are you going to get the SES people out if they? I mean, they're kind of a law unto themselves?
Yeah, well, I know that, for example, amel Bove was the acting deputy attorney general until Todd Blanch got confirmed, and I love Amel Bove. If you think I'm a savage, you should go meet Emil Bove. He is a savage. He looks like a serial killer, he's an awesome guy and he's a political serial killer. He's done a lot of work already at the Justice Department getting rid of people who were bad actors or just wasteful lawyers.
How many people at the Justice Department are like that, do you think?
A good chunk of them 50% Higher, higher. Meaning they're either. I wouldn't say that the Justice Department doesn't, I wouldn't say that it's wasteful as much as there are left-wing radicals in these key career jobs. And there's the Attorney General, who's political, there's the deputy attorney general, who's political, there's the associate attorney general, who's political, there are assistant attorneys general for each one of the divisions who are political.
There's the FBI director Cash is political, but then most of like 95% of the people who work for those top officials, 95% of the department, maybe even more, are career right.
And so that's the problem is these careers, these career ranks, are full of left-wing radicals, particularly in the management branches the chiefs of the litigating divisions, the assistant chiefs of the litigating divisions, emil Bove and Pam Bondi, and Chad Mizell, the chief of staff, and Todd Blanchett, the deputy attorney general. They're going through those very quickly and they're getting people out of those jobs and getting better people in these jobs.
But can they? I mean, there's been a judge who blocked even that right. Even saying that you can't fire people.
They try to Now. They've been successful on appeals, on firing people right, but that's what these activist judges look. This is going to be again a slog every day for four years, but at the end of these four years we're going to be successful. We're going to have our executive branch back to what the Constitution requires. We're going to be dismantling these agencies. We're going to be returning power to the states and to the people, as is required under our Constitution.
And under the Constitution, can the president get rid of the Federal Reserve, since it's not a federal agency?
Well it should be. You have to ask this question If it is an executive branch agency that doesn't report to the president of the United States, how is that constitutional? And the answer is it's not, so can he?
What I would do if I were the President is I would order the Chairman of the Federal Reserve to dismantle much of the Fed and fire much of the people, and if the Federal Reserve Chairman doesn't do that, fire the Federal Reserve Chairman and that becomes a legal dispute for the Supreme Court of the United States to resolve.
What about the IRS? Because that's a corporation too, also not a federal agency, correct I'm?
not a fan of the IRS. I don't know about you. It sounds like those 87,000 new IRS agents under Biden might be turning into immigration officials and maybe those IRS agents might be changing diapers on the southern border instead of terrorizing small businesses across America.
Well, but is it a federal agency? I mean, it's a corporation. Is it not Formed in Puerto Rico?
The IRS is Internal Revenue Service is a part of the Department of the Treasury. So I don't know about the Puerto Rico thing. I've never heard that, but that sounds like a very interesting rabbit hole to go down.
Well, I would like to know. I've been trying to figure it out.
We should make it a defunct agency in Puerto Rico, so let's work on that.
Will it become the external revenue service?
Yes, make tariffs great again under President Trump.
Yes, okay, most critical legal issue facing the president at this moment.
So the most critical legal issue I country, that's going to be the most important issue for the Supreme Court to resolve, because I can't think of anything more lawless and dangerous than what Judge Boasberg did by exposing this ongoing military operation by ordering planes turned around ever, let alone if he doesn't know the fuel levels or doesn't know the security footprint in America to return those, and it's just an unbelievably lawless order and dangerous order that he thinks he can order.
The president of the United.
States. Doesn't he have a conflict of interest anyway with his daughter?
A lot of those DC judges have conflicts of interest. Their spouses are getting grants from USAID. Their daughters are working for NGOs that are funded by the government or take positions.
Political campaigns or legal offices. Yeah, it's a mess.
Yeah, I mean we saw that with Judge Juan Merchan's daughter in New York for that bogus criminal trial against Trump.
Another winner that judge? Yeah, exactly.
Another Marxist judge. I can't remember what Marxist hellhole from which he came Columbia maybe. From which he crawled? Yeah, from which he crawled. His daughter, laurenuren, was raising money off of that criminal trial and he should have recused, but he, instead of recusing, he threatened to throw trump in jail if he raised the fact that lauren mershon's raising money off the trial.
It's just, it's unbelievable corruption of the judiciary and at the article 3 project, we're going to make damn sure that the american people are educated and engaged on these issues.
Is Fannie Willis done?
Big Fannie.
Yeah.
You saw her. She was with Nathan Wade. Again, I want to say this to Nathan Wade, and I mean this in all sincerity, this is going to be good.
Okay, let's hear it, this will be good.
So she paid you $700,000 to Nathan Waite clearly because he's a legal genius, as we saw and Big Fanny got these kickbacks around the world. She went to Belize, the Caribbean. She's a Grey Goose girl. She lived it up, she lived large with Nathan Waite. After we saw her in that court proceeding where she went nuts, I actually have a great deal of sympathy for Nathan Wade. I don't think he got paid. I don't think $700,000 is enough money to be stuck with that slob. And they're again.
They're stuck together. So, big Fannie I hope Big Fannie understands that she also could be the target of any criminal investigation for conspiracy against rights, just like Tish James and the big Tish in New York, nathan Wade. These are all these Democrat prosecutors and agents and operatives, witnesses, judges who engaged in this criminal conspiracy against President Trump to take him off the ballot, bankrupt him, throw him in prison for life. It's unacceptable what they did, this law.
I've been fighting it for the last three years, four years at the Article III project. I will continue to fight it every single day. People call it retribution, I call it law enforcement and there's going to be accountability for what they did.
Will the president back efforts to restore January 6th defendants, because I know he did an enormous thing by pardoning people?
Yeah.
But so many people's lives have been destroyed.
Yes.
They lost their jobs, they lost their homes, some of them lost their families, some of them lost custody of their children. I mean, they're fighting on so many different fronts and I wonder if he's aware that there is a concerted effort which has been articulated on a number of different sort of leftist style shows to continue to go after and target people pardoned by the president to put as many of them back in jail as possible.
I would say that there is a civil rights division at the Justice Department. Harmeet Dhillon is going to be the head of that civil rights division and I guarantee you that Harmeet Dhillon and Todd Blanche and Pam Bondi and Emil Bove and others are not going to put up with that. They will be prosecuted under our civil rights laws. If that happens, the Justice Department I'm going to keep pushing this and I think it's going to happen.
There's a victim's fund at the Justice Department that they can use to help these January 6th people who were persecuted. Remember January 6th was a lawful protest permitted by the National Park Service that devolved into a riot. And what the Democrats did with January 6th some would say a Fed surrection. Some would say that the Feds instigated it to cover up the stolen election in 2020. And I tend to agree with that assessment.
But separate from that, what they did on January 6th is they said it was an insurrection, even though no one was charged with insurrection. How many insurrectionists go into a nation's Capitol unarmed, walk through velvet ropes, follow police direction, take selfies and walk out? That's not an insurrection and I guarantee you, trump supporters have guns. So if they wanted to actually do an insurrection, they would have done an insurrection.
So the Biden regime teaming up with weak, idiotic, fake Republicans like Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger and Mitch McConnell Mitch McConnell Shameful what these guys did. They had to get rid of Trump, they had to get rid of MAGA, they had to get rid of Trumpism. So they made their lives living hell. They persecuted these defendants and the Supreme Court made that very clear in the Fisher case. They should have been. Their people should have been.
There were three categories of people who were there that day. There were the people who were outside and they were peaceful and even if you don't like them, even if you think they're crazy, they have an absolute first amendment right to be there. Then there are people who trespassed and they should be charged with trespass. And then there are people who are violent and they should have been charged more harshly.
Instead, everyone got lumped together as an insurrectionist and they brought bullshit charges pardon my language against these defendants made-up charges like the 1512 obstruction charge, post-in-run obstruction charge. They put people in prison for months before their trials, even solitary, sometimes years. Solitary confinement made these people's lives a living hell while they gave—.
Terrorized them actually, while they gave amnesty to the much more deadly and destructive BLM and Antifa and Hamas rioters.
And I would also argue with your definition of the trespassing charge.
No, I hear you, some people were let in.
Well, many people were let in and also, as you said, the Park Service permitted rallies at their. So you know, you had people like Jeremy Brown, who had been a member of the Oath Keepers for a couple of weeks, who was asked to do security for a VIP speaker. There was some African-American woman who was speaking and her mother was there and she needed security, so he did security for her. He literally didn't even go into the building and he was charged with trespassing.
Yeah, well, remember this. I was the staff leader for the Kavanaugh confirmation. We had people disrupt those proceedings, threaten senators, threaten staffs, disrupt the committee hearings, disrupt the vote on the floor, and none of them were charged. They weren't charged with anything.
No, if they were, they got a $15 fine and by the way every single, every single January 6th, defendant was denied a First Amendment defense yeah, by the same pool of judges, including Boasberg and Marchand I don't know if it was Marchand- Marchand's in New York, but it was Boasberg.
It was Boasberg and there were a few others Chuck Tinn and all the the same crew, the Marxist Obama and Biden judges and the weak Republican judges.
Who presided over hundreds and hundreds of cases.
In the meantime, you have protesters during the Trump administration. Attack the White House, burn the Secret Service guard station, torch St John's Church.
Injure Secret Service Beat up the.
Secret Service Beat up Rand Paul as he's leaving the White House meeting.
Not a.
US senator Nothing happens.
Yeah, and so you have a lot of these people who's you know they're never going to get that four years back.
They need to be restored, and you have people like Matthew Per, people who's you know they're never going to get that four years back, yeah.
They need to be restored, and you have people like Matthew Perna, who put a rope around his neck and took his own life.
Yeah, these people need to be restored.
He's been in trouble in his life and they were threatening to remember the whole the terrorism enhancements and things like that. So you know the Justice Department, because they can't charge you with terrorism, they're just going to add an enhancement to your sentencing to bump you up a category so that they can put you in jail for longer. What the hell is that?
Well, remember, very early on in this administration, trump the Trump, a Mel Boeve, the political mass murderer, fired all these January 6th prosecutors, walked them out the door.
But those judges are still there.
I hear you.
Why are those judges still there?
Well, that's a very good question. I actually think, and I've been calling for this I think Congress needs to dismantle the DC District Court. I think it's been lost to the Marxist judges and the weak Republicans who go along with it. These judges, this court is out of control.
What about Southern District of New York? It's not as bad as DC, but sure, pretty bad, though Put it on the list. Any other judges you don't like, we'll put them on the list, okay.
Emil, we need to add another judge to the list, but no, we need to dismantle the.
¶ Reforming the DC Court System
This is what I propose. This is what I think needs to happen. There's a federal court in DC, the US district court, with all these bad judges. There's the DC superior court that handles like state matters the DC street crimes, the DC civil cases that are like if you were in a state court. There are a whole bunch of vacancies on this DC superior court. It's an unconstitutional court. These local Democrats get to pick the judges.
The president just has to rubber stamp one of the three picks recommended by the local Democrat leftist. So what I think Congress should do is get rid of the DC Superior Court. Make these DC district court judges who have lifetime tenure, make them do DC street crimes and then all other federal cases should be randomly assigned to a federal judge across the country. So they bring them in for a case or for two months, three months, whatever they want to do, sit by designation.
That way we are randomly drawing judges from around the country, instead of these Marxist DC radicals and the weak Republican DC judges.
Is that realistic? Do you think you can get that?
I'm working with Senator Grassley's office, my former boss, the chairman of the judiciary committee, Senator Mike Lee, house judiciary members I'm working on that legislation right now.
Okay, so well, good luck with that. We're going to check back with you.
Thank you, keep me on task.
Yeah.
And if you can talk about any of those things you can't talk about now, you just let us know Okay, let's talk about it, let's talk about who we're firing next and no, I'm kidding, we're not doing that.
Well, thank you very, very much for being here. I know we got to get you to the airport.
Yeah, thank you. And thank you to Joe for taking me out to dinner and feeding me too many drinks last night. You know that.
I'm the.
Irish guy, so thank you for having me. This is a Texas is a great place with great people, so thank you.
Thanks for going, rogue.