216: California measures stomped, Flutter-Fox ruling, election betting analysis with Paul Krishnamurty
Nov 10, 2022•54 min
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more
Episode description
USBets.com Managing Editor Eric Raskin and Senior Analyst Jeff Edelstein analyze the colossal failures of the sports betting legalization measures on the California ballot, what the arbitration ruling in Flutter vs. Fox means, and why a UFC fight is being investigated for “suspicious betting,” plus they talk to political betting expert Paul Krishnamurty about why the midterms didn’t go as the election wagering markets predicted, how soon is too soon to bet against Trump in 2024, and when fully legal election betting is coming to the U.S. Find us on Twitter @US_Bets or go to USBets.com for more.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android