Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to Forward Thinking pay and welcome to Forward Thinking the podcast that looks at the feature says, as he strong listen Bud, he's got radioactive blood. I'm Jonathan Strickland, I'm Lauren Bocaton, and I'm Joe McCormick. And today we're going to be tackling another listener request topic. It's a kind of creepy one. I almost wish it was Halloween season to do this. Yeah, it's actually not that creepy as it turns out, which
is kind of the point of this entire show. Basically, you can stop listening spoilers. If you were expecting creepy, We're largely going to be dismantling some of it is totally creepy. Okay, read, let's let's read these listeners right well, Actually, more than one listener has, in in different kind of ways, asked us to cover this topic. And the first one is from our listener, Amy, who actually wrote us a really long, super interesting email full of excellent ideas. Eventually,
I want to get to all of Amy's ideas. But the part of her email that's relevant was she asked us. Have you ever done human animal hybridization? If they could grow an ear on a mouse, poor mouse? She says parenthetically, can they give humans the nasal capabilities of a dog? What about the muscle strength of a gorilla? M O? And it's worth asking, and we will we will attempt to answer some questions in this, but we have another listener. Uh yeah. Lee wrote in on Facebook and said, Hi, there,
I had an idea for an episode. I'm not sure if you've covered genetic hybrids or not, but all the superhero episodes got me thinking of this. Since I grew up before why it was really a popular genre. I've been going back and reading some of those books now, including Maximum Ride, which has characters that are genetic hybrids, humans spliced with a bird or a wolf. I know they have created such genetic hybrids with some food and plants. I think there was a tomato with fish genetics senet
or something, and just one it. If you could talk about this technology in general and the possible future of it. Is there something in the science that would prevent us from using such technology with humans or animals or is it purely an ethical concern? Well, guys, I mean Amy and Lee, thank you for writing it, and this gave us a great opportunity to look into this and discuss it.
It's a I mean, this is a hot topic issue in many ways because while it's not like we're seeing, you know, cheetah boy running around outside, but we are. Science is reaching a level where we've got a lot of questions that pop up around things like this. Yeah, and it's not even that new of a concern. I mean a lot of our discoveries about genetics and the human genome and things like that have given us new anxieties. But the fear of crossing species goes way way back.
It goes back into actually into mythology. You've got you know, like folklore with the minotaur, it's you know, half human, half man, and half man. I like, how I just rolled right through that too. I was like, yeah, half human, half man, that's terrible. You got me. I was trying to slip a fully human past on you. As a minotaur. This is an es School act with the head of a rabbit and the body of a different rabbit. Now the minotaur, of course, with the head of a bull
and the body of a man and all that. All the terrifying stuff that comes with that. But even more recently, but also less recently, you had H. G. Wells the Island of Dr Moreau, right, which case you're talking about surgery in order to alter animals to be more human like and then conditioning them in order to be human right, Well, had he didn't know anything about genetics, nobody did yet, but he he already had this idea and was feeling
a bit cautious about it. Oh yeah, yeah, Well, I mean that was also an anxiety I would imagine based on the surgeries of the day that were often performed at open galleries because you had to make your own fun, right right. Uh. And there was no TV back then, so and we did talk an awful lot about that crossing of boundaries in our Future of Monsters episode Oh yeah, which we did last October with Robert Lamb. Yeah. Yeah.
We even talked about it earlier in our September episode GMOs Food and fud or If Your Uncertainty and Doubt, where we talked about how and and Lee alluded to this, the idea of the transmit, transplanting genes from one organism into another in order. Yeah, in this case, the fish jeens to tomatoes. The idea there, I believe was to
make them more resistant to frost, yeah, cold weather. But uh, some people said, oh, does this mean that I'm going to get scales on my tomato or it's gonna taste fishy or smell fish right, which again, that was if you if you were curious about that, then you should definitely go and listen to both of those episodes because they kind of lay some groundwork. But we're going to continue that conversation and talk specifically about incorporating genetic material
of animals and humans together. Yeah, okay, So one of the first things I think we should do is a little bit of vocabulary clean up because the word that always gets used in in popular talk about mixing species is hybrid or hybridization. Now, in a technical sense, a hybrid is something specific, and a lot of the times when people are talking about certain kinds of animal human hybrids,
they're not actually talking about hybrids. In the technical sense, a hybrid would mean you've crossed germ cells like a sperm in an egg and created a true genetic mix of two different parent species, and so the offspring species would have the would have a mix of the two parent species DNA in every cell of its body, whereas a lot of times what people are actually talking about or what we would call chimeras. Yeah, chimera is also
uh interesting organism. This is one that has at least four parents cells instead of the normal two and has at least two different sets of DNA as a result of this. Right, so you could be a chimera. That's you know, you are Jonathan Strickland, a human of human species, but some part of your body has been supplemented with with cells or genetic material from another species. Okay, so
there we've established the basics. But the question that's at hand is mixing of humans and other animals in nature or any other organisms. Has anybody actually already done this and have and if they've done it, have they done it in ways that we should be concerned about? Um,
they totally done it. Yeah, the answer to your first question is yes, whether you want to be concerned about it is really a personal issue that we should think on, which you know, we're not saying it's right or wrong to be concerned or not concerned, merely that it is a personal, you know decision you're gonna come to, well, sure. Sure, and we can tell you about some of the ways that this has been done and perhaps you can begin
formulating that opinion. Yeah. And so when it comes to mixing or or transplanting genetic material from one organism into another, we've done a lot more, i would say, of transplanting human genetic material into animal cells than the other way around. Yeah, so it's it's more of creating a human animal hybrid in a cellular sense, uh, with the human material going into the animal cells. Um. For for various reasons, and a lot of this has been for two major areas
of research. One is biology just simply learning more about biological processes, and the other is being able to advance medicine. And uh, it turns out that there are really good reasons to pursue both of these in order for us to get a better understanding and also just more effective medical treatments for all sorts of stuff. Okay, well let's
hear an example, all right. So, um, you know, when a pharmaceutical company is developing drugs and they need to start testing it on organisms, obviously they don't jump straight to humans, right. We talked about this in a previous podcast. I'm pretty sure, yeah, yeah, about the method that that new drugs need to go through before they ever reach human testing, right. I think we were probably talking about this with respect to the idea of the organ on
a chip. Yes, Like, can you you create a system that allows testing of drugs on simulated human organs that doesn't necessitate testing of animals or live human subjects? Right, So the testing of animals is a very I mean, that's that's the accepted way of testing drugs before moving on to human trials, and to get them safer before they move on to those human trials. Right. You're learning
exactly why dosages maybe toxic. You're learning whether they're actually efficacious or not, what kind of side effects they might have. But you know, an animal isn't exactly like a human, right, even the animals that we tend to use, Like we talked about how close mice are as far as you know when we're testing drugs, Like, well, mice react largely the way humans do. That's not entirely true. They have very different cellular makeup for certain organs. So, for example,
a little mouse liver. Let's say you want to create a drug that you realize it's going to potentially have an effect upon the liver. If if that effect arises within a mouse's liver, that may or may not be indicative that the same day could happen to a human.
So one of the things we've seen, as we've seen scientists UH put human liver liver cells into mouse test subjects and try to find out if in fact they could create uh essentially a liver in a mouse that is human tissue as opposed to mouse tissue, to thus test these drugs and see what the effect would be on a human liver. UM Sheep have actually been used for the same purpose, and most research that involves putting human genes into animals cells is along these improved animal
testing research lines. Um uh mice have also been given humanized immune systems an attempt to give us new test subjects for HIV vaccines. UM there's tinkers at the University of Michigan that gave a mouse a human anal sphincter to test treatments for incontinence. What. Yeah, that's science. That's something that's science that happened. So here's one that is more. This one certainly kind of skirts the line from some people's perspective as far as ethics are concerned, this is
this is going to be part of this discussion. Is this idea of giving animals human like intelligence, if that were ever a possibility, would that be ethical? And I'm not suggesting that that's what the team I'm about to talk about did, but it starts to approach that line. So there was an experiment at the universities of Wisconsin and Rochester to separate universities. Obviously, that involved using a toxin to destroy the hippocampus in test mice. That's the
part of the brain that's associated with memory. So they would train the mice to, say, run a maze, and the mice would learn how to run a maze. Then they would use this toxin that essentially destroyed the hippocampus, so the mice could no longer remember how to run that mace. They couldn't do it anymore. Then they transplant cells from human embryos into the mice, which essentially repaired the damage in their neuron cells, and they regain their
cognitive functions and we're able to run the maze again. Yeah. The the hippocampus is one of the few parts of the human brain that does regenerate. Um, I mean and not like wolver Raine regenerates, but but but the way that your skin might regenerate. Wow. Yeah. Um. Other than brains, there are some things that humans produce that we would that it would be kind of cool and convenient if animals could produce for us, um, like cars, like milk.
M Some researchers in China took jeans that create human milk proteins and swapped them first inten mice is a kind of test run, and then into goats, and these goats can now produce quantities of humanized milk. So this experiment involved milking mice to get human milk. Yeah, it's good on a resume. Uh. You know, my first reaction to this is one of like, this is where we get into the creepy thing. Just one of those initial reactions. And by that I mean personally, that's my reaction. I
don't mean to suggest everybody reacts that way. But then it leads me on to think, wait a minute, I drink other animals milk all the time. I am a big milk consumer. I like cheese as well, and I like goat cheese, and I eat so much cheese. Y'all. You know, it's just one of those things where I realized it would be weird if it was human goat cheese. Yes, it would be weird. It would be more weird would technically would just be human cheese that you got from
a goat. This, this whole thing is kind of odd. At the same time, however, I can definitely see where it could be a benefit. You know, it's not It's not necessarily the most healthy thing in the world for say, an infant to be switched to another animal's milk right away. Sure, and and yeah, and even formulas don't really make up the difference of all of the benefits of human milk, right, So, I mean, I totally see where this is going. It's just it's interesting that that was the first thing on
this list that had me get that kind of reaction. Yeah, but you know, rationally, again, I I get around that pretty quickly, But there is that weird emotional reaction that I can't necessarily explain. Another important use for this kind of approaches is the cultivation of stem cells. Now, stem cells are very important. We've talked about those before. Stem cells have the potential to turn into other types of cells. Right, you've got potent stem cells. Those are the that the
golden goose transformers. Those are the ones that have the potential to be any type of tissue. Now, a lot of stem cells have specific types of tissue they're limited to they can only develop into certain kinds. But at any rate, cultivating them has been a controversial issue for many years, and there we've seen a lot of advances in science to allow doctors and scientists researchers get stem cells in innovative ways. Uh So, scientists in the UK used cow egg cells that they kind of scooped out
the genetic material. They put in the human genetic material from skin cells. They stimulated those cells and that cause them to divide and create stem cells, which they then harvested. Rabbit eggs have been used for the same thing, actually, or rabbit egg cells, I should say, because otherwise we're talking about the Cadberry bunny, which is a different issue. However, if you want to send us Cadbury eggs, feel free. We will do so much research about how tasty they are.
I will. I will research until I can't feel my right arm. So who are you too? You eat candy eggs? Cadbury eggs are amazing. I'm gonna have to show you a video when this don't know what I'm going to show you a video when this is all over of a guy who makes Cadbury eggs. Benedict's. Is that on Epic meal Time? No, it's on Andy Candy. It's a free plug for Andy Candy. There's Uh. There's another category of research that can really only be carried out with
hybrid cells like this. UM. For for example, the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota gave pigs some human blood, like human blood pumps through their veins. Um. Not like they became vampire pigs. No, not that I'm aware of um. Uh And and and having this human blood in the pigs system, let's researchers look at how viruses pass from animal cells to human cells. Very important work. Yes, yeah, we have talked about that before on this show. I believe in
terms of the future, yes, yes. And hybrids can can also possibly help us gain a better understanding of cells. Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA, which is generally important for medical research because it's one of those tiny things that that we can't really get that good of a look at by just looking at normal old human cells. For example, in human pig hybrid cells created at the University of Warwick, UM Higgs egg cell will be implanted with a human
cell nucleus. Okay, so so like so like scoop out the pig nucleus, put in a human nucleus UM, and then watching the cells grow UM. Based on that that large amount of genetic information from the human nucleus, and though we little bits of genetic information from the mitochondria that are still pig mitochondria UM will throw each DNA types rolls into more of a stark contrast than we would normally see from from regular cells UM, because you know,
the different cellular structures affect the whole cells. You know, complete growth right so UM. So hypothetically watching and learning from these interactions could lead to better research into therapies for genetic defects and stuff like Alzheimer's. That's really interesting.
I never considered that, but it makes so much sense when you've got you know, we talk about complex systems all the time on this show, whether it's biological system or a climate system, and the idea of being able to kind of force a system where there is this stark contrast where you can see those reactions more clearly because there's this delineation due to the fact that you're
talking about two different species. Genetic information is a really novel approach that I honestly had never heard of until until just now. Yeah, using this method be a way to isolate variables, right right. Um. Then there's also the crazy art side of things, of course. Um there's what yes, crazy art hybrids for crazy art. Um, there's Dr Moreau
as an artist. A guy named Eduardo cock Um worked together with a plant biologist by the name of Neil Olswisky to put a little bit of of Eduardo's genetic material into a pink petunia. It doesn't do anything other than grow pretty much normally like a petunia would. Um, but he does call it a plant amole. Why wouldn't you. That's pretty cool. So this is this is swamp thing they made swamp thing or or it's man thing, one of the two. It could be either one. It's and
it was. It was a little bit of his amino globin DNA, So it's it's part of it's sort of clever because it's it's uh, you know, part of your DNA that tells your body which cells are yours and which cells are something else's, And so by incorporating them
into something else that was kind of cute. What if it turns out this bowl of flowers is in fact the same character from Hitchhicker's Guide to the Galaxy that thinks, oh no, not again before breaking on the surface of the earth, Dear, What if these flowers are sentient and have a soul, thus saying oh no, not again when falling,
he's doomed his genetic material to a terrible fate. Yeah. Actually, I already know the answer to that, because there's a character in the Hitchhecker's Guide series gets reincarnated over and over again and is constantly killed by Arthur Dint And
it's not No, it's not EDWARDO. Well, okay, So we've talked about putting human genetic material into animal cells, and you know, I think a lot of people would be on board with that basically if it's done for a good cause, if it's done for useful research that can save lives or teach us more about how the body works and things like that. But what about going the opposite direction, So bringing animal material into a human organism. Yeah, well,
we've done some of that. It's not a genetic transplant, but we've seen zeno transplant experiments. That's where you take an animal organ and transplant into a human person. You mean like Dr Brinkley, Dr Brinkley. Have you not read about Dr I haven't read about Dr Brinkley's gonna have to explain. Dr Brinkley was a guy who came up with the popular goat testical cure, where he would put goat gonads into men's bodies to increase their virility. That's not what I was thinking, but that work out for
people not so great in the end. Yeah. I just looked it up and uh, and his full name was John Romulus Brinkley. He later changed the Romulus to Richard And I can't imagine why I was hoping we changed it to James Tiberius Brinkley. I was. I was hoping he would go with John Vulcan Brinkley. So we have a very similar joke in mind. But I think he's
better Joe. Yeah. Well, at any rate. Uh, you know, the xeno transplants really are more like things like taking a baboon heart or a pig heart and transplanting it into a human patient, and I guess you could say it's been met with limited success. Really, the transplanting another species organ into a human very frequently results in the
human body rejecting that organ. Yeah, well, I mean transplanting a human organ into another human can frequently and in rejection of the and and smaller pieces I think have found more success. I think I've read about pig heart valves to bypass surgery, things like that. Also, joints being joint replacement surgery. Sometimes the joints are taken from animals, and that has seen more success. But yes, when you start getting into complicated tissues like kidney or heart, then
the chance for rejection gets a lot higher. Yeah, that would just be my non expert intuition would be that the more the tissue is just a sort of basic mechanical object, the better it would do. And and the more it's like a complex thing, it seems like that would be more likely to not work out. Yeah, anything that's tied to any kind of hormones or proteins or any of those we little bits that fly around and muck all of our stuff. They call the decisions on
our behalf without us knowing about it. Put some dead leaves under your skin, and yeah, I just shove it in there. It's fine, Like suddenly it became a Tim
Burton movie. Uh. Well, the interesting thing here to me, I mean, this is all interesting, but this also leads to the fact that there are doctors and scientists who are trying to work with animals to develop more human like organs, you know, actually cultivating human like organs in animals for the purposes of transplanting those into actual human patients. So this would combine both of the things we just
talked about. So it would be like making putting genetic material from a human into an animal to make the animal grow something that's human that you can take out of the animal and put into a human exactly. It would be the idea of you've got a human heart, but you've got your human heart from a pig, so kind of like getting your human milk from a goat. I guess, uh, but you know that's that's the possible future that we have with this. Now. Granted, this is
one element one one line of research. We've talked a lot in other episodes about other lines of research that could end up making this particular or line obsolete. So, for example, if we get to a point where we can reliably produce three D printed organs based upon the patient's own biological information, that's obviously preferable and safer and uh, you know, more cuddly for the poor pig. Right, you don't have you don't have the ethical questions about is
this really the right thing to do? You know, altering animals in order to benefit humans. We've done that throughout the entire history of our species is not new with genetics. We've been doing that forever. It's just now we're able to do it on a level that some people find disturbing questionable. Yeah. Uh so obviously though, like you were saying, Lauren, Yeah, going with this other approach would mean that you don't have to put those animals in harm's way, You don't
have to alter them in any way. You don't have the tricksy question of whether it's okay to eat the pig after the human heart has been transplanted out. Wow, I didn't even think about that, But then I don't eat mammals, so, uh that one, that one did not
even occur to me. That's excellent point. Uh, you know this is still the three D printed organs is a wonderful future that we hope we get to, but there there may be many many years before that's viable, which is a reason why this other line of research is in fact necessary. I mean, we are talking about human
lives in the balance here. So that being said, let's talk a little bit more about what are our listeners brought up this idea of not just human animal hybrids, but actually bestowing upon people animal like traits due to this kind of cross hybridization thing, right, like a like like terrific fins for swimming, or or the or yeah, our the ability to do a vertical jump that's three times higher than watching normally could and land it without
breaking all your bones or snapping attendant uh, bombardier beetle burning acid chamber. Yeah, or just a dung beetle's ability to push a weight far greater than its own, so that way, when your car breaks down, you can just move it yourself off the side of the road without you know, scorpion tail, six extra eyes, sider web spinning capability. Now we're getting to the quote I started this entire episode off with, um, Yeah, so here's the deal guys.
First of all, scientists have pointed this out many times. We don't know enough to do anything like that, Like not even we don't even know what we don't know yet, right, we don't the ignorance here is this enormous black cloud, and we have the dimmest of candles shining just a little bit of light. We don't know enough to be able to dope a human with human genes, uh, let
alone using another animal. So you're saying like, we don't know enough to go get some Olympic sprinters genes and put that in somebody else and make them run fast exactly, and that you would assume would be at least a little bit easier than translating some animal characteristic into a human. Going from one human to another has got to be
orders of magnitude simpler than that. I mean you're talking about, like, how would you ever make sure that such an organism, such a hybrid between a human and an animal, would be able to survive, to be born, alive, to grow and develop, and to develop those animal traits in a way that is incorporated with the human traits. I mean, these are all really complicated. The ideas that we just don't have the answers too. We don't have the question.
We don't even know the questions to ask yet, right right, And and it's you know, we were talking earlier about examples of hybrids and nature, and and not even those work out well all the time. I mean, even even something is as simple as a as a African versus a European elephant can can not douce viable offspring. So so if you you know, with this in mind, we don't we don't have any way of approaching the answer
to this question yet. I mean, we don't know, um, if there are actual limits to what we can do, Like, is there is there a hard limit to the amount of genetic material that we can transplant from one organism into another and have it actually make a meaningful change in whatever, you know, whatever the result was supposed to be. Um,
we don't know. There might be a limit. There might be something where we find out that, you know, I really wanted to to have retractable clause or something, and it turns out that no matter what I do, I can't have that happen. It's not gonna there's there's just a limit. And then cells are no longer viable. That's a possibility, we don't know. Also, side note, um elephants have been extinct in Europe for several thousand years, so
it's probably more like Asian elephants that were interbreed unsuccessfully. Yeah, well I just wanted to throw that in there. Well yeah, but that that just means the European elephants really aren't going to be breeding with the African elephants for multiple reasons. But also there's the question of ethics. Is it ethical to do this, because we're not talking about, you know, being bitten by a radioactive you know, wombat and suddenly
you have wombat powers. We're talking about creating an organism from the cells up right, You're not you know, you're not talking about having some sort of shot that you get and now you're panther man um. It's it's gonna be more like, well, let's try and create a bibit that's got animal characteristics and human characteristics. That's a huge problem, is that. I mean, because you can't ask that baby that's that an Let's say it works, but then they decide, oh,
you know what, this was a bad idea. We can't do that. Well, now you've got an organism that is the only of a it's kind, and you know, we've read plenty of science fiction that has warned us against this very thing, like like it's completely unfair to the organism. And you know how the the amount of a hubrists shown by by the humans who are in charge of
it is ridiculous. So there is that ethical question like where do you get to the point, like how can you how can you come to a conclusion where this is in fact something that should be done. Um, and it may very well end up being moral on the lines of for the sake of the future of the species, we have to alter the species. If we were to ever get to that point, maybe it would be a viable conversation to have. I can't imagine what that stuff circumstances would be. But that doesn't mean to I don't
mean to suggest that it couldn't possibly come about. What if there what if there's such a change in climate, for example, that we realize, well, if we want humans to exist on another three generations, we have to change what humans are. Yeah, yeah, but I mean it probably wouldn't be you know, like I don't know, like dragon arms for law zys, like it's not going to be it's probably never going to be like that. I don't
see us gang too. I mean, not even considering the fact that Dragonstone exists, right, I was just thinking of Trug Door. He was a man. He did, he did. But what if you're a human, it follows that a human, yeah, do Trug The very first part of the Door was a man. I mean, he was a dragon. He was a dragon man. So there's some confusion already. We don't know what what how it all started at any rate.
Here in the United States, a few states have actually passed laws that formerly formerly that formally prohibit animal human hybrid creation. UM. These laws generally positive that you know, it's okay to implant most genes or or organs into animals, and to implant little animal bits into humans where applicable for the kind of medical research purposes that we've talked about um during this episode. UM, but that it's not
okay to fertilize human eggs with animal sperm or vice versa. UM. And furthermore, that's not okay to attempt to put a human brain into an animal, right, because that's shady as hell, y'all. Well, yeah, I mean like if you if you give an animal the ability at all to think on a remotely human level, that raises tons of ethical questions. Well, yeah, I mean, as soon as you've put a human brain in an animal, you've essentially created the salient factor about being human that
says we shouldn't experiment on, you know, humans. So now by virtue of the fact that you've created a human animal hybrid, the experiment is intrinsically unethical, right, Yeah. And I think a lot of people might say that that such laws seem like they are regulating something that doesn't exist yet, that there's no, we don't have the science.
But at the point it's it's almost hilarious in fact that anyone was so worried about this that they felt like they needed to pass a law like right now, because it's it's not it's not anywhere close to that.
But at the same time, it's almost like saying, do we entrust that people come to these ethical decisions on their own when they are knee deep in the science, or do we get ahead of it and and regulate or make a law now that that paints a distinct line and says anything that's across this line is totally tote's not okay, guys, Yeah, yeah, And and they're and they are pretty sensible laws at least, I mean that the laws aren't aren't in there going all like oh mg,
no mermaids, y'all. Yeah. Yeah. The last thing I would point out is that we don't even know if let's say that it is in fact possible that we figure out how to do this where we can give uh animal traits to people. Let's say that we have satisfied whatever ethical concerns there may be. So now we've reached some formidable, huge assumptions assumptions. But even then I would worry, like, um, okay, let's say you can do it, and we decide we feel good about doing it. Yeah, is it a good
idea for the organism? Right? Is it actually going to work out in the long run? Right? One? Is the organism viable? Is it going to live? If it is going to live, what kind of life are we talking about? On top of that, we don't have any idea of how this could impact the overall population. So you know, we were talking earlier about studying how viruses can pass from animals to humans, that the viruses can com mutate to the point where it infects one species and then
can slowly infect other species. I would imagine this kind of hybridization would could potentially escalate that sort of thing. So we don't know. I mean, obviously it's at a level where it's beyond what we can really talk about realistically. But it's again another concern, so not just ethical or possible, but also is it safe. All of these questions to me suggest that uh, if anything, if we ever get to that point, we are decades away from that uh
maybe even beyond the standard forty in this case. Um. But and again, it may turn out that other advances in science and technology make a lot of these questions moot, because perhaps we'll end up finding technology to enhance us and give us animal like abilities, but without actually implanting animal genetic information into us. We may rely on some sort of technological uh construct, whether it's an exoskeleton or some form of implant, that would allow us to do
those kind of things without genetically altering ourselves. UM. Don't know the answer to that either. I just I think it's more likely because there I think the ethical concerns are a little easier to handle. I mean, there still are some I mean, obviously there's some for doctors who would perform such a thing, but I think it's a little less murky than the animal questions. So uh. And and also a lot of those things come under the umbrella of enhancing us rather than altering us. There's a
there's a subtle difference. I think. Oh yeah, I think that in general, when when there are lives to be saved, human lives to be saved, um, we can we can excuse an awful lot of things that um that that might be a little bit on the tricky end at the speaking, Um, you know, it's it's one of the the greater good kind of things. Um. But I think it's to all of our greater good that we wound up talking about this today. So thank you so much to Lee and Amy for that was a great question
that both of you sent in. Uh, so well done. I assume there was no collusion between the two of you. Uh, Now, that's fantastic, And we really had a fun time looking into this very kind of tricky conversation to have in many ways. But if you guys have any other questions that relate to the future, something that you've always wondered about and you would like to hear our take on it.
We'd love to hear from you. We love getting this and we want to do more of these kind of episodes in the future, but in order to do that, we have to hear from you first, So right to us. Our email address is fw thinking at how Stuff Works dot com. Or drop us a line on Facebook, Twitter, or Google Plus. At Twitter and Google Plus, we are fw thinking. Search for fw thinking at Facebook will pop right up. Leave us a message, and we'll talk to
you again really soon. For more on this topic in the future of technology, visit forward thinking dot com, brought to you by Toyota. Let's Go Places,
