How to Catch a Time Traveler - podcast episode cover

How to Catch a Time Traveler

Nov 07, 201456 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

If time travel is possible, then surely someone from the future has visited our present. How would we know it happened?

Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Speaker 1

Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to Forward Thinking. Hey there everyone, and welcomed up Forward Thinking, the podcast that looks at the future and says it's astounding, time is fleeting. I'm Jonathan's Stricklin and I'm Joe McCormick. And you know what, Jonathan, I give you a hard time about a lot of your lyrics, but I think

that one was highly appropriate and enjoyable. Yeah. I think so too, because today we're gonna be talking about a really specific aspect of time travel that I wanted to do an episode about for a while. Okay, and why is that, Joe? How do you catch a time traveler? Well, I guess you have to be really careful. I mean someone's going to be able to stop time, or or change times, or or zip through time, and would make

it pretty tricky. Do you mean, like like physically catch a time traveler just just figure out that a time traveler was around. I mean you'd have to have some kind of very clever bait, like, uh, I don't know what to time travelers eat? Oreos? You can catch me using oreos. I think if you had a sonic screwdriver, that'd be a good a good start. I thought at least one of you was going to make some kind of poke ball joke, like you got to catch them

all chrono poke ball. You severely under thread old. I am okay, No, I don't mean physically catching time travelers

like in a big bear hug or a net. I mean finding evidence of time travelers because okay, So we've talked on the podcast in in previous Adventures through the Mind space about whether or not time travel is a technological possibility, and basically the answer has always been maybe, we don't know, like like like a very thin maybe sure uh, or more specifically, the question of what kinds of time travel are technically possible for humans, because, for example, well,

we know based on the theory of relativity that you can travel into the future. All you have to do to do that is go really really fast, or or you can just wait right. Yes, we are all time travelers can travel into the future faster than the other people. If you get into spaceship going the speed of light ship a long loop journey, and then come back, you

will have traveled into the future. Time time will have passed more slowly for you relative to the people who stayed behind, But traveling into the past, we don't have any laws of physics that seem to indicate that that's possible. Well, I mean, there's sort of all these scenarios you can construct based based on relativity. You can come up with the way that, well, if this were possible, we could

go into the past. We just don't know if it's possible, right, Like, for example, if we were able to travel faster than the speed of light, we would technically be traveling back in time, right, Or if you could create a wormhole or create these closed time like curves, you could theoretically travel into the past. We just don't know if we can do that. But there's one way that we in the present here could look for evidence of whether or not traveling into the past will ever be possible. And

that method is, drumroll bela look for people from the future. Okay, gotcha. So, in other words, look for evidence that people have done this, people from the future have come back, and if we find that evidence, then that suggests that in fact, time travel is possible. Yeah, totally. So there there could be time travelers from the future walking amongst us today. But if they're there, how do we find them. That's the

question that we're gonna ask today. Okay, And I'd say the first place we should start, because it's the most obvious, is that maybe we won't have to find them. Maybe they will just identify themselves willingly, for example, publicly on internet forum. Yeah, this is in person. Yeah, well you know,

I mean, you've got stuff to do. Uh. So there's a famous story of a character I guess it is the best way of putting it, named John Tetoor or John Tighter, depending on how you want to pronounce the name. I always said, Yeah, I've heard it both ways. This was a persona that was let's say invented. I'm gonna go that far, because I think the evidence pretty much points to hoax. He was an internet storyteller. Yeah, before we closed the book, let's tell the story briefly and

then and then say what our conclusion. Sure, alright, So the story is that this person traveled back in time from the year two thousand and thirties six to warn people, well really not even to warn people, but he did warn people to harold. He happened to post on the Internet while he was taking care of some business. Yeah, that business was that he said that in two thousand thirty six the world was on the verge of of a collapse because of a legitimate problem, that is in

the Unix operating system, that being a date problem. Now, you guys remember the whole y two K debaccle, right, yeah, yeah, the idea that programmers had set a two digit year in a lot of programming languages, which works fine until you hit the year two thousand, because suddenly nine changes to zero zero, and all of a sudden, everyone's banking is very confused, right, right, All the computer systems are working as if the clock has reset, kind of like

if you've ever played an old style pinball game and the the score turns, so it goes back to zero and suddenly it doesn't know that you made a high score anymore. Think of that except for worldwide consequences. Sure, and they two K bugs specifically was not the only computer glitch that this sort of system was involved with, right, No, Generally, there was this idea that Unix based systems would have a similar problem in the year. Right. And so here's

where the story gets really funny to me. So the story is that it's twenty six in his time, in two years, everything's going to really fall apart. And their big problem is that they don't have any technology that interfaces with this Unix system anymore. It's Unix. Yeah, So what they need to do is build a time machine to go back into time and get an IBM computer that can interface with these Unix systems, and with that, I guess, single computer fix everything so that catastrophe is averted.

And so he was sent back to nineteen to get one of these machines, then did a quick stop over in two thousand in order to just you know, mess around a bit, uh, specifically to go and visit his three year old self in two thousand. Uh. Now, the first first indication of this time traveler at all was and I didn't even know this until we were researching this recently. I did a full podcast about John titor On on a sister podcast, Tech Stuff, many years ago.

But Art bell received a facts and Art Bells was a radio host of Coast to Coast a m and the show was famous for let's say fringe topics. If it's three AM and you want to tell a story about how you saw a UFO land and werewolves got out of it and probed holes in your body, you

call art Bell. Yeah, so the the facts is to art Bell, were essentially stating that it was a time traveler from the future and Y two K had caused worldwide devastation and uh and so this was when the facts has arrived, all right, by two thousand, when the forum stuff was happening. By the way, there are a lot of people who suggest that the facts has sent art Bell and the forum person were two different people,

but both working from the same general idea. Um. Now, clearly by two else and we knew the Y two K bug didn't cause worldwide devastation because hey, we were still here. Yeah yeah, we spent you know, millions upon millions of dollars and lots of man hours and woman

hours in order to fix the problem. So yeah, So in this case, the the new person who originally went under the handle time Travel underscore zero, I like it, wrote wrote in a Time Travel Institute forum about how I'm sorry I have to interrupt you because I love the idea that a genuine time traveler tried to register the account time travel, but it was already taken and so underscore zero obviously didn't register in time enough I don't see a problem with that. With time travel, that's

totally true. He could have traveled back to before the user name was taken. Look, we all know from dr here that some events are inescapable the fixed points in our timeline, and perhaps the creation of that particular user hadle in that particular for him. So you know, there's just a weeping angel somewhere just typing and laughing. Ha ha ha. I'm sorry I interrupted you. So he made some predictions, Yeah, so, well he didn't. There weren't predictions.

He was talking about history, not predictions, right, So, first of all, he did say this was his get out of jail free card. He said that the time travel machine actually did not take one back to one's own time, but rather a parallel time that would be within one to two percent in uh, in agreement, Yeah, in agreement with their own So there'd be one or two percent deviation from the timeline, so certain things would be changed. Yeah, and also had kind of said that, you know, by

going back and altering things, you could actually change the future. However, uh, there were some things that suggested that he suggested what we're going to happen, or said we're going to happen. Uh. Teacher also said that that the Olympics in two thousand four, that's the last one two thousand would be canceled, and then there was a little, uh you know, civil war in the United States by two thousand. He claimed that he had served in it. He said he was like

a shotgun soldier or something something influenced at any rate. Uh. Yeah, that by two thousand thirteen there's a civil war happening in the United States. Obviously that has not happened either. Uh. He then said that by two thousand fifteen, I believe there was going to be a attack by the Russians in the United States, but seeing how's how the other ones haven't panned out, I wouldn't worry too much about that.

Um So, yeah, he he was making these statements and was also really uh taking a pretty firm stance on things about, you know, the stuff that people shouldn't do, like they shouldn't eat beef because in the future mad cow disease was a real big problem, and that they needed to get off of that reliance upon beef now rather than than you know, court disaster in the future. Um So. The thing was that, you know, the predictions that's made so far have not panned out at all.

It does look like it was pretty much a hoax. He also, uh, there was a John Tetor Foundation, a for profit limited liability company that was formed in Florida. The person who formed that is a lawyer, um, and his brother is a computer scientist. And yeah, I think

I heard about this, didn't they. Like somebody hired a private investigator to look into this and found out that, like the guy thought it was this computer scientist, there are quite a few people who and at least through the circumstantial evidence suggests that the uh, the brother is in fact the the the brains behind John Tetar and the lawyer is the is the person trying to make

money from it. Um. But I mean again, that's what we can say is there is a lawyer in Florida who does have a company, the John Teeter Foundation, that he formed, and he has a brother who's a computer scientist. That's all we can say definitively. However, based upon the predictions, it doesn't seem like this was a legitimate time traveler who came back and um, you know, used a car that had been outfitted with a time travel device on it so that he could um seamlessly fit into nineteen

seventy five. You know, there's this. It was a pretty silly story, and of course his his point was that Teeter's point was that he could go back to nineteen seventy five, retrieve the computer, and then spend as much time as he wanted to in the past, because when he returns to the present, Yeah, it would just be a couple of seconds. So he said, oh, I came to two thousand, My mission is done. I'm done with my mission. What if he like died in two thousand

and then never got to take the computer back. John Teeter clearly wasn't thinking this through. He was one of supposedly one of like eight people on a mission, but everyone had different parameters to their missions, and his was that he had to go back and get this IBM computer. So was he so this car of his that created singularities that took him through time? Did he also just

drive this around take it through the Taco Bell? Yeah? Essentially, I mean it was supposed to be like the I remember that the requirements were that the car had to have a really good suspension because it was a gravity drive that was the time travel device. Yeah, I'm I'm telling you what the stuff that came out of this.

The other thing to remember is that even if this were all possible, let's assume somehow that they were able to create a time travel like device, it would also have to travel through space because the Earth would not be in the position that it was in when he left. And then that's not the way cars travel through space, right, but not not through space, Okay, I would have this

car just appear in the middle of of nothing. Okay, Well, I think maybe we can close the book on John heat Or it sounds to me like I maybe jump into conclusions here, but I think he wasn't a real time traveler. I'm gonna pretty much say I think that's that's skepticism. Yeah, okay, so of course he's not the only person who's ever claimed to be a time traveler from the future. But I guess we talked about him

because he's the most famous. He's the one everybody's heard of, or at least he's he's one that we have lots of documentation for because it all I'll played out on internet forums, right, but all the stories are pretty much like his or less interesting. They make predictions that are either too vague and too far in the future to be verified, or they turn out not to be true. But that's not the only way to look for time

travelers or to find one. Rather, if they just like come out and say, hey, I'm a time traveler, guys, yeah, yeah, if we we can, we can have other methods to find someone besides just hoping that they are going they announce themselves. Yeah, then their ego demands they that the world know them as time travelers. Right. Well, the other thing we could do is int them to show up somewhere, and in fact, we've done that lots of times. Well

we haven't. Yeah, I've done episodes on time travel for text Stuff back in the day, and I said, listen, here's the thing. This podcast is going out. It will remain out there for quite some time. Here's an open invitation for a time traveler to go through and and visit how Stuff Works dot Com on this day. In fact, we're recording this on October twenty, two thousand fourteen, at

around three forty five in the afternoon. If they want to come by, you have my permission to walk right into the studio right now uh nothing, but see that's just me doing it. I said five, they did, They've got the time so I haven't seen the five flip. Oh there just went Okay, Okay, so time travel it's

never gonna happen, right, or at least completely. We can at least suggest that if it does happen, either anyone who does time travel doesn't listen to this podcast, which is a possibility, or or that there's some other reason why they wouldn't reveal themselves, or maybe they've got other stuff to do, like go to the m I T. Time Traveler convention. Right, I want to talk about this one. Okay, two thousand five May seven. If you're a time traveler,

what are you doing? You're going to m I T Campus for an awesome, awesome party or what will be an awesome party because or what would have been an awesome party? I guess what will be then? What what wasn't an awesome party but could be an awesome party in the futures past. Okay, Okay, cut it out, cut it out. Don't get into the timmey wymy jokes. We're

going down the road here, all right. Students at m I T and may have two thousand five, led by an electrical engineering and computer science grad student named Amal Dorai, held an official convention for time travelers. And I think this is just an awesome idea. A little side note, the original website for this event still exists. It is delightful and fully worth checking out. I think you should go look it up. But according to Dry, any real lifetime traveler was welcome to show up at the event

without rs V ping. All non time traveling attendees had to rs VP, but the time traveler had to bring proof that he or she was from the future. He said, you know, anything that really seals the case will do, but we would prefer proof that's also of practical use, like a cure for AIDS, or a solution to world poverty or a cold fusion reactors. That's very deep thinking

of him. I like that. Yeah. Uh so, in what I think was a very smart move, Dery and the people involved with the conference focused heavily on press, on getting the word out. This was a case where sort of shamelessly hounding media attention was not just understandable, but it was a vital part of the experiment. Right. Well, you know, because the website wasn't going to stick around forever. Hypothetically, that's what he said, but has uh so far. But but they did in no way of knowing that at

the times right. I just want to read directly from their sort of frequently ask questions on the official website, because I think this is hilarious. So the question is, why do you need my help? They said, we need you to help publicize the events so that future time travelers will know about the convention and attend. This web

page is insufficient. In less than a year, it will be taken down when I graduate, and furthermore, the World Wide Web is unlikely to remain in its present form permanently. We need volunteers to publish the details of the convention in enduring forms so the time travelers of the future millennial will be aware of the convention. This convention can never be forgotten. We need publicity and major outlets, not just Internet news think New York Times, Washington Post, books,

that sort of thing. If you have any strings, please pull them. I love this plea because there's the there was the sphere. I guess that I don't know the Internet at the time. The Web is just this transient thing keep in mind, this was after the dot Com bubble burst, and so there was there was already a I mean, granted this was five years after that, but this was already a time where people had first saw the Internet as this this promised land, this this wild

West where you could build anything. The dot Com bubble burst, and then suddenly we all began to be a little

more cautious about it. So and of course we were also talking about what is the next iteration of the Worldwide Web, which were still kind of waiting for, whether that's the semantic Web or Back in two thousand five, we were still even thinking about the possibility of like a virtual web where we would have more of a a an experience where you're navigating like in the movies where suddenly you're you're using a head a head mounted

display and you're your physically moving past things. And ultimately we all said, you know that that sounds stupid, but at the time that was really one of those things we were thinking about. It's it's definitely more cinematic than scrolling and clicking on a web page, but in anywhere at any rate. I love those nineties hacker movies where the hackers used game controllers and then that you encounter a skull and crossbones and that's that's the security firewall

and yeah, yeah, yeah. Anyway, so the dery and the people organizing the conference asked people to try to create a big name for this conference so that it would be remembered into the future, and to leave records in obscure places like physical lasting records. Right, so write down the details about the party and then just hide them in library books all over the place, or or carve them into clay tablets or right or or or you know, put a new face on Rushmore that says party at

my place and time travelers. Yeah. So they eventually did get plenty of coverage in the press, including a subsequent rite up in Nature News called Time Travelers Snow Conference. Oh well, I mean, you know, that's obviously we all failed in our attempt to publicize this, and the time travelers of the future just didn't know about it. That's one way of interpreting it. Obviously, you can tell yes from the title nobody no time travelers showed up. But from what I hear, it was a great party. Yeah.

Another party that happened was put on by Stephen Hawking. This was this was the best way of going about this. I think Hawking's affair to remember, and I think he added a really clever twist to this. So on June nine, Stephen Hawking held a party in Cambridge. All existing time travelers were invited, so he must have had a lot of food and drink on hand. I hope. I don't know how many time travelers you expect to be. You gotta cast a wide net. Yeah, it's really hard to

tell the caterers. I mean, just like any Facebook event, you invite you know, three times more people than and actually fit into the venue because you know, not a lot of people are gonna hit maybe and that means

they're not showing up. Right. Okay, so all the time travelers were invited, but the catch was Hawking didn't issue the invitation for the party until after the party was scheduled to take place, which is well after until after the party actually happened, right, Because that's the that's the best thing, you know, is the idea that well, with time travel it doesn't matter when you announced the party, as long as you make it clear enough that the

party was going to happen. And uh and the time travelers would be able to travel back in time to when the party was actually happening and arrived there. So theoretically of time travel is possible, and if people were to hear of it and they were wanting to go to this party, they could go to it even though the invitation happened after the event actually occurred. Right. He was also focused on trying to get the word out and make sure that he left some kind of impression

that would be accessible to the future. So he had an invitation flyer made up. It said you are cordially invited to a reception for time Travelers hosted by Professor Stephen Hawking, to be held at University of Cambridge, Gonville and Caius College, Trinity Street, Cambridge. And then I love this. It gave the exact global positioning co ordinance of the party,

So that's pretty awesome. That's good, That's that's important. Champagne was served, though it can't have been all that rowdy of a party because it was held at twelve noon. I don't know, I've been to Cambridge. I think that that's have you have you met the Have you met the footlights? Because trust me, they could tie one on I mean twelve noons, just when they get started in Cambridge, might be when they woke up from the previous one. I wonder if maybe Hawking just didn't wait long enough

for the fashionably late time travelers to arrive. I I don't doubt. And maybe they kind of peaked in the windows and they realized that he'd already drank all the champagne, and they were like, well, would you be more fashionably late than like anyway? Right? So he He later publicized the party in the press and on the web, and had a very elegantly designed version of the flyer printed up, which you can actually still buy a copy of. I thought about buying one because I thought that'd be a

cool thing to have, he said about it. I'm hoping copies of the flyer in one form or another, will survive for many thousands of years. Maybe one day someone living in the future will find the information and use a wormhole time machine to come back to my party, proving that time travel will one day be possible. So who showed up to the reception Hawking? Nobody, nobody except talking Well, I don't know. He might have some other friends.

No time traveler, No time traveler showed up. He later said during an interview at the Seattle Science Festival, quote, I have experimental evidence that time travel is not possible. I gave a party for time travelers, but I didn't send out the invitations until after the party. I sat there a long time, but no one came, which is so sad. He sounds like he's kind of like it kind of hurt his feelings. Well, I mean, you know, you might be sad for multiple since One you're sad

because no one came to your party. Too, You're sad because apparently time travel is not possible. Three, you're sad because you drink all of this champagne. And so you're extra sad about those first two things. Right, So I he maybe just sat there and watched all the excellent champagne go flat. Yeah. So, but this is this is obviously one of those things that we've seen demonstrated repeatedly. It's not these are not the only two times as

has happened. I remember taking some of the most fabulous Yeah. I have taken classes in physics where the physics professor would say, all right, everyone this class, remember this day. Write it down. Uh if this if time travel is possible. I want a time traveler to come to the class this day. Of course, that depends upon everyone in the class, or at least someone in the class remembering that passing it along so that that information ultimately gets to a

time traveler. These other examples we've mentioned had a better chance because they were more widely publicized, although again you could argue that uh, these, these uh events were publicized and then quickly forgotten about. Right, That's always a possibility to Oh sure, sure, especially in the grand scheme of

of human life. You know, these might not last more than a few centuries, so we might need to find other ways to look for time travelers that doesn't involve the time traveler standing up and being like, oh, hi, I'm here, I'm here. You invited me here, I am right, which is where the use of big data comes in, of course, always yeah, and I So, I want to talk about a paper that came out in January of

this year. It was January UM. It was called Searching the Internet for Evidence of Time Travelers by Robert J. Nimrov and Teresa Wilson of the physics department at Michigan Technological University, and I love their idea. I think it's really cool. So the paper, uh, it's a fun read. If you actually want to check it out yourself, it's there. Their approach was, on one hand funny, but on the other hand, I mean actually probably the most scientific approach

to this question that's ever been undertaken so far. Alright, So what was this incredible scientific approach I want to know. Well, they attempted to find evidence of time travelers by sifting huge amounts of Internet data looking for quote prescient knowledge, which would be verbal patterns indicating that someone had knowledge

of the future. And they had three methods. So first was to look back at the web for terms that wouldn't have made sense at the time they were published, but which now refer to something meaningful now that we

have knowledge taking place later in time. So the two examples given were search terms related to quote comet is on which was not discovered until September twenty one, two thousand twelve, and quote Pope Francis, who was formerly just a cardinal not named frances He was Joge Bergoglio, and he chose the pope name Francis and mar and there was previously no pope named Francis. He is the first.

So they searched both web and social media. On the social media, they looked at Facebook, though they explained that a search of Facebook has limited value since results are sort of attenuated in terms of time, and you can back date posts. Well only that, but you know, you have a limited view of what's been posted based upon uh, you know, your security. But more usefully, they searched Twitter also for instances of key terms associated with these phrases

appearing basically before they should have in time. Then the second thing they looked for, and I thought this was really clever, was looking for prescient terms, not as published on the web, but in search records, right, just just in case of time traveler was you know, again trying maybe not to out themselves and so therefore wasn't posting about their time traveling adventures all over the Internet, but rather might have been looking something up before they really

should have been. This sounds like the worst history student in the world. Like, it's a student who's been assigned to write a paper about a specific point in history, and it would have to be a point in which we have already created the Internet. They go back before that event, even happens, because that's how bad a history student they are. Then they happen to our limited internet, which would look primitive by any futuristic standards, and search

for terms for things that haven't happened yet. That's exactly what what it would have been. I bet somebody from a kid from the hundred has to write a report on Pope Francis time travels back to two thousands. Like, that's about right. Google's Pope Francis gets nothing, goes backusts Now. I will say this, based upon the search habits I have seen high school students use, this is not that

unrealistic a scenario if time travel is in fact possible. Yeah, so I think this is a really good approach because even if time travelers are sort of being on their best behavior and not publishing blog posts about future popes and comments, they might privately search for these terms. So yeah. The Google trends unfortunately did not turn up anything interesting, but the authors pointed out that Google may not remember

searches that have occurred at insufficient volume. So maybe if somebody's only searched for something one time, ever, it doesn't even show up in Google, right because you're looking at your looking at such an enormous number of search terms used like at any given time, that would be really really tricky unless you have, you know, a a a continent worth of students who all came back at the

same time. One of the studies authors, Nimrof, happened to also have access to the back end of NASA's Astronomy Picture of the Day site and he he took advantage of this to check to see if anybody had searched for images of comet ice on before it was discovered and named uh. Didn't turn up anything interesting, unfortunately. So the third method they used after looking for published things in search terms was they invited future people to travel into the past and to tweet at them or email

them with one of two hashtags. And I love this. One of them is hashtag I can change the past two numeral too UH. And this would be if we discover that time travel occurs in a plastic history set of conditions where the past timeline is changeable UH. And then the other option they did, which I thought was really smart, was hashtag I cannot change the past too numeral too. This would be if we discover that time

travel occurs in a fixed history scenario. In other words, time travel is possible, but we would already have observed its effects. This is consistent with something known as the Novikov's self consistency principle. It's the sort of theoretical way of thinking about the effects of traveling back in time that says that whatever whatever effects are caused by time

travelers have already been observed. Okay. So, in other words, the I cannot change the past two, which you could argue actually changes the past by introducing not necessarily because they were careful not to search for the hashtag I cannot change the past two until after they had placed the advertisement asking people in the future to go back

and place it got you. But even so, then you know that time travel is possible, that in order for the time travel to have happened, that event must have happened in order to precipitate the time travel that happens in the future. And we're getting time Oh no, sure, sure, now that makes perfect sense. I'm glad that they set it up as an experiment not only to find out whether time travel exists, but what model of the universe of time travel we are operating under. That's that's good,

that's you know, adding the extra layer. Yeah, so I thought this was really clever and a lot of fun. But unfortunately they say in the conclusions of the paper that they really didn't turn up anything interesting, Like, I mean, we learned something interesting from the paper, but they they didn't find any results that really seemed to indicate time travel. So we've tried all these ways so far of looking for time travelers, but we haven't found any. And I

want to transition to the question of why. In one way, we could sort of look at this as a time based version of the Fermi paradox. The Fermi paradox says, look, there are all these planets out there, you know, they could feasibly be holding alien life. So why aren't we hearing any transmissions? Where is everybody really far away? Is my answer? But that could be yeah, yeah, yeah, but there, Yeah, there's a bunch of reasons why we might not have

found anyone. Well, sure, one of them is just the fact that we have already mentioned the idea that people in the future may legitimately have not heard these various invitations. And it's not that they're being rude, it's just that they didn't know about it. Yeah. Another explanation would be simply that time travel into the past is impossible, at least for humans. Or maybe it's not impossible but simply

never achieved. We will just never figure Maybe we would have figured out time travel, but the day before we would have figured it out, we managed to kill everybody, everybody on the whole planet. Yeah, like humanity. Yeah that's cheerful. Well, no, there there are plenty of scenarios. Have you not heard about these? About the doomsday? Various doomsday scenarios where that could also be swallowed by a catfish made of bubble gum. I'm just saying it's one of the that's my favorite abilities.

Catfish made bubble bubble apocalypse. Another one is the idea that that time travel might be possible, but we can only go back so far, right that so the time travel sort of you'd have to create a checkpoint. It's your safe point in a video game. So you could only and this has been suggested by thinkers smarter than us before, that it's possible to create perhaps some sort of wormhole based time machine that would only take you back to the point at which the pathway you created

was created. So, in other words, any time before the time machine was built is inaccessible to us. Another is the causality branching idea. Right, that's the term I used. There's maybe a better way to explain this. But the idea is that when somebody travels into the past, they actually travel into one of an infinite number of parallel universe is what te Tours was saying. Yeah, so your

chances of meeting one in your universe are fairly low. Right, So in other words, you are not really traveling back into your own time, uh timeline, you're trailing slipping dimensions. Yeah, and it maybe that it has a one to two percent deviation from your own home dimensions was talking or maybe donuts righting from the guy? Yeah or yeah, exactly into that Simpson's treating the hard Exactly. You kill that

one mosquito and suddenly everything goes haywire. Another one, another idea that I've seen in science fiction is the idea that if you were to travel back to your own timeline, it would automatically create a copy of your timeline. So let's say that I go back in time to visit my younger self. Um, when I travel back as soon as I arrive at that point in time, it's a duplicate of our timeline. So everything up to that moment in time is identical. But from the moment when I

come in forward, it's a new timeline. It's it's a branch almost. Yeah yeah, so I can. I can change that timeline without affecting myself because young you and your own timeline grows up and becomes you. Yeah yeah, But the the me I'm looking at in in the time I travel back to is not the me because now it's a branch to me. So I could kill me and I'd still be okay, because the me my timeline still grew up to become the me that traveled back

and was homicidomaniac. It's another version of parallel universes. Basically, I'm on a lot of cold medicine makes me violent. That's really good to know, being that we're all trapped with you in this very small st just intellectually violent. I'm too tired to be physically violent. Okay, shut up. I want to talk about another intellectual possibility, which is that it's this is entirely possible. Time travelers from the future are amongst us, but they're intentionally hiding, and so

far they have been successful. This this one, to me seems the least likely, actually, okay, most mostly because I know people and people make mistakes. Well, yes, people do make mistakes, and they're not very good at keeping secrets.

But the question is how many time travelers are there? Well, I mean if you're talking about if you're talking about an infinite amount of time, then there's an infinite number of time travelers, likely because I'm pretty sure someone else will figure it out, not just one person, unless that one person figures it out and then eliminates everybody else. To go back to my violence, but I would imagine that this would be incredibly difficult to hide over any

length of time. Uh, anyone coming back making a mistake would obviously start to raise some eyebrows. Now you could argue that maybe other people in the future say, well, let's go back and fix that. Yeah. Yeah, I like to think that there's like a time travel janitorial crew that go out, but that just becomes a domino effect. There was some movie I saw a trailer for within the past couple of years that had a premise kind of like that, didn't they I don't know. I've me

thinking about Looper. Ben Boland would say, you're thinking about Looper. Okay, Okay, So what you're saying basically is that even the really smart time traveler from the future eventually is just gonna be a total nano rod because we all are sometimes and he's gonna make a mistake, She's gonna she's gonna, you know, post a blog post that says something about the future. I find it less likely that there would be only one time traveler. That's the I would think.

If time travel is possible, I would expect there would be multiple instances of it, and I can't be convinced that through those multiple instances everyone does it perfectly all the time. I would think the more frequently it happens, the more likely some trace evidence of that travel would become noticeable. So that brings us to the question of how can we go about ferreting out any of these time travelers that are poking around making mistakes? Right? What

hasn't been tried so far? So the Michigan study is really fun and interesting, and kudos to them, But as the authors point out, it was very limited. I mean, even if it is the most exhaustive search so far it had, you know, it was kind of modest, pretty small in scope. Yeah, so what else could we do to use the data in the world around us to

look for time travelers evidence of time travelers? At least I thought one thing would be simply to exp band on what they already tried, because I mean, how often are people from the future really going to be talking about commt is On and Pope Francis. If you found that, that'd be really interesting evidence, But you wouldn't necessarily think time travelers would be leaving data about those things on

the web. Yeah, so you'd really need to be looking for anything that really caught the world by surprise, something something that was huge news that there wasn't a lot of lead up to a combination of words specifically that wouldn't have made any sense before. Yeah, maybe the name of an earthquaker disaster or a world leader, or a disease that we only really found out about in the

past couple of decades. Right, And then you know, you would want to try and make sure you limit that, like anything that had a human cause would be somewhat problematic because there's a possibility that the humans who caused, it might have had some activity that could change the results. So that's why you would try to kind of avoid that.

Anything that was a plot, for example, there you might find evidence of it, but and the evidence you find was actually the formation of the plot, as opposed to someone going back and studying something that in their past had already happened. So you know, it's a little more tricky if it's a human caused event. But if it's anything that was not caused specific specifically by humans, like a scientific discovery that was unexpected, would be a good one.

But again that's a little tricky because there's probably people who are actually actively looking into that kind of thing. So, right, and there's another problem with scientific discoveries, which is, I mean, how much does the average person actually talk about scientific discoveries by name? Well, I mean, if you're talking about a time traveler, you expect that they would be coming back for some significant purpose, right, Maybe I don't know.

I mean, So to remedy this, I thought of another option, which would be to look for older hypertext containing a relatively high density of recently coined words that are part of common use language. So, for example, like a person from the future, unless they are like a Vatican astronomer, probably wouldn't have much reason to talk about Pope Francis and comment ice on. But you might see people, say, posting online in the year two thousands saying words like

unfriend and selfie and sexting. Yeah, if someone's talking about lull cats and twerking like too early in the internet timeline, that's a that's a dead giveaway. It's also something of an unusual um example, simply because you're assuming that such words would have longevity and not fatal. We don't know, but we can try it. I'm just thinking about slang and how quickly it changes, and how quickly we abandon lots of it. I'm sure people will still be saying

selfie and sexting in a hundred years. I think we'll probably have evolved to a different form of terrible harassment than sexting. But but all cats will be around forever, that's true, and they truly live in our hearts. They then at the internet, too, so they did. I tried another version of this. I was gonna say, actually, I thought this was brilliant at first, but I just a

quick experiment blew it out of the water. I was going to say, we should look for uses of the word muggle appearing before the publication of the first Harry

Potter book. In it seems good on the surface, Yeah, but I did a Google Ingraham search for the term, and either the word has other uses throughout history, or I just discovered evidence of future Harry Potter fans going back in time and publishing books in the eighteen sixties and nineteen o eight in a bunch of other years, right, A lot lots of fan fit activity in the eighteen six I mean there's another there's another possible explanation, which

is that perhaps not everything and the book was original, but you know, well a lot of the terminology, specifically the J. K. Rowling used was very much based on already existing um slang. Sure, and there was a lot of of course faux Latin in there too, right, so you know, I could have probably looked it up. I don't know what muggle actually meant before Harry Potter. Maybe it was someone who got mugged. I'm sure it was

something magical, all right. Well, what about other evidence besides things like the traces people have left behind on maybe online searches, what about actual physical sightings, because we've had a few, a few examples of people who at least jokingly have suggested that we've got evidence of time travelers amongst us because of things we've captured on film, yeah, or or audio or in photographs. Because right, we've been

talking entirely about text up until now. Really, so so what about documentation of people using non contemporary language or dialect or you know, clothing technology, other objects like that. So you're thinking specifically of the Charlie Chaplin film Premier Spectacular. Yes, I thought you were referring to the Nicolas Cage vampire from The nore Uncanny. Yeah, we're talking about the s Kuss.

So there's a video online, you can find it on YouTube that shows some footage from I think it's actually the film premiere of The Circus, but maybe it's from the movie itself, but anyway, it shows a person walking along a sidewalk and appears to be holding a cell phone or other type of mobile device up to her face. For all the world, I mean this was from and this looks exactly like what you would expect someone walking

and talking on a cell phone to look like. Right, And and maybe a few years ago, we would have been suspicious because it's such a large device. But now that we're now seeing the iPhone six plus and other enormous fablets coming out, I think it's back to being realistic. Um, but you know, not to burst everyone's bubble. But it appears upon really close examination that this may have been

a hearing aid like device. Yeah, the first kind of new fangled electric hearing aids were starting to be patented in the early nineteen twenties. I think that's the first one that I saw. Siemens had a model that was very much like what was seen in that. Yeah, I mean, or the person might have just had an earache, or I mean, we don't know. It could have been any number of reasons why they kind of had their hand and and an object up to their face while they

were walking along. Now I like that there's the second hoax. Hoax, but second example because I know exactly the photograph you're talking about. Yeah, yeah, it's great. There's this very internet famous photo you guys might have seen it called the time Traveling Hipster, and it's it's an image of a man and in large sunglasses and what appears at first glance to be a T shirt and a hoodie standing in a crowd shot in UM. Upon examination, you realize

that the glasses actually were contemporary. Okay, that the level are before. I think he's got kind of an eraser head haircut. Yeah yeah, I sort of like I stepped right out of Bonaroo And now, yeah, I mean he's cute, like I'd say hi to him. Um. But but but his glasses, it turns out, actually were contemporary, although the leather side guards on them were a little bit antiquated at the time, So maybe he really was a hipster

of the UM. And his clothing does bear out for for common like sweater and cardigan layering that the the day's youth would have been wearing. UM. Specifically, the sweaters NIT logo was one for a local hockey team UM that like players or rink staff would have would have been wearing. Yeah, and he also this was a photograph that was taken at the opening the reopening of a bridge, and one questions while at time traveler would go to the opening, I can't miss this. Why would a non

time traveler go to the opening? Yeah, like like hey, no, no, I see he stranded there and he's incredibly bored, his time machine stopped working, and he's got to wait until they invent something in the nineteen sixties before we can go back to his time. It does, it does look like in the image that he's that he's holding one of the um like early nineteen forties box cameras. UM. And and so maybe, you know, maybe he was making

his own memories to send forward to the future. Perhaps he was a photographer for a local publication and the reason why he was there was to capture this magic moment for all of posterity. At any rate. Um. There there are many, many, many other examples that get passed around UM and you know, but but like these, they can really be debunked without even a whole lot of research. Um. Of course, that's a that's a whole lot of work for for any given human to sit down and and

file through. So I was thinking that maybe if we want to to really search for time travelers, we could, especially as like like AI visual recognition algorithms start improving, we could set some robots to the task of searching for these extemporaneous visual cues. Yeah. And then of course, obviously anything that would be flagged would have to be reviewed by humanized to make sure that no then actually is a whatever contemporary, contemporary piece of technology or whatever

happens to be. You know, this is a promotional image from a science fiction movie of the time. Yeah, yeah, this was. This was a movie that was specifically made to look like it came from that era, but was in fact made in The funny thing is you would never mistake one of those old sci fi movies for the present. No no, no, no, no. Um. And I was trying to think of how we might do the same thing for for audio recordings, and I think it

might be actually a lot harder. I mean, I know that just on this show we've probably done some vocal flubs that might sound like something some word from the future. Yeah, oh yeah, you know. The other day, I I we edited it out, but I was trying to say the word focusing, but I said folking, and I was just like, I know, folking is going to mean something within twenty years. It's not a word now, but it's coming. It's going

to be big. Whereas everyone's going to watch my brain stuff video about the old timey voice and assume that I'm from the past. And if someonew managed to land in the present. I think both of your time travelers to be frank. Like I said, I do travel their time. I just do it at a very steady rate. Okay, So one last question. If we assume that there are time travelers amongst us, but they are good at hiding themselves,

what could draw them out? I mean, assuming maybe that they would have to willingly reveal themselves for us to find them. What what could get them to step into the into the light that there was a question I was thinking when we were looking at Stephen Hawking's party. I mean, is the allure of champagne and hanging out with Stephen Hawking enough to make somebody from the future break radio silence and show up? Well beyond that, I mean, how do you how do you make a serious offer

that someone from the future would actually find tempting? Keeping in mind that you have to assume that the future is either going to be super awesome where they've got pretty much everything they need anyway, I mean, by the time you get to a time machine, you probably have managed to cover all the regular bases um or it's going to be really, you know, just incomprehensible to us.

So how can we predict what they would want in the first place, you know, And how do you provide incentives to somebody who might live in a post scarcity world? And how would you do that in a way that you could back it up without it just coming across as a joke. Right, Like, if I end up making an advertisement and I offer something that either I clearly cannot actually grant, or if I were to do it,

it would really cause some serious problems. It might be big enough to attempt somebody, but everyone would say, well, he can't realistically give me that. So here's my offer to you future time travelers. I mean, obviously coming in at three wasn't good enough. You weren't you weren't gonna do that, And it's after four o'clock now, so um, I'm gonna have to up the anti Uh. If you come through that door in our studio, you get a coupon for a free backrup. Now. These are fantastic. My

wife loves them. I don't give her any other presents and she smiles every year when I give these to her. Uh, they don't have an expiration date, so you just have to come in and tell me. We can set up the time and place. I got a better one. Whoa, whoa, whoa, Joe, I'm sitting right now. You may not be able to make a material appeal to these people. You may not even be able to appeal to their sense of I don't know, social desire, because maybe in the future they're

just too cool. But you can appeal to their schadenfreude. So, people from the future, if you show up at four on what is this October, Jonathan Strickland will do something really humiliating. I don't I don't know what it's gonna be, but trust Lauren and I to dream up so thing really good. Yeah, and I promise I'll do it. The minute already flipped. Well, I you know the other one we could say, we could appeal to a sense of vanity. You could be the time traveler to break world news

and be in the history books on forward thinking. Yeah, the famous audio podcast. You know, we we are right up there with like this American life and or the very least we know people who are right up there with American life. We've listened to this American Life, so obviously we're having a lot of fun with this. But I mean you kind of have to because we don't have any evidence, so they're ever working, right, So I mean we are dead serious, y'all, like like future time travelers,

we will follow through on these promises. I mean, you know, maybe we need to get more more rad people like Stephen Hawking on this game plan, have like Elon musk Er or I don't know, um, maybe Scarlett Johansson or whoever, whoever people in the future want to hang out Bill Murray, that would be Bill Murray would totally hang out with you if you traveled back in time to see what what this tells me? But he wouldn't tell anyone about it.

Our our listeners clearly didn't spread this audio podcast far enough, So I blame you get to work. Yes, let's blame our listeners. It's a great way to build an audience. No, obviously we're all again having fun. But this is this, you know, this is one of those things where we say this kind of a strike against at least unbridled time travel, and maybe maybe that time travel itself is in fact possible, but it has one of those limitations we talked about earlier. So this was really fun to

talk about. And uh, we've got we've got a lot of other fun topics in mind, some of which have been suggested by you guys, our listeners. So if you want to suggest any other kind of fun future oriented topics let us know. Send us an email all right addresses FW thinking at how Stuff Works dot com, or drop us a line on Twitter or Google Plus. Our handle at both of those is FW thinking. Search for us on Facebook. Put f W thinking in that search

bar will pop right up. Let us know what you want to hear, and we will tackle it and we'll talk to you again really soon. For more on this topic in the future of technology, visit forward thinking dot com, brought to you by Toyota. Let's Go Places,

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android