Forced Adoptions

this one because well it's something that's close to her heart. Anyway, parents threatened and blamed by authorities as a thousand adopted children have returned to care. There's a personal story in one of the newspapers, and I'll read varieties. Breaking point with adopted son Liam came after she had already been threatened with knaves and arrested by police following untrue allegations. Now this has something common or these stories untrue allegations.

A husband recounts that she at one point, I husband recounts that she said, at one point to a social worker, what if we can't just do this anymore? Which is fair enough most people say that. He says that social workers reply again without a moment's notice or hesitation, will you'll be prosecuted for child abandonment and this is an

adopted parent at this case very tinian. Are just fifty say just two a fifty parents this report had spoken to during a six month investigation into why adopted families are being broken apart from their children and returning to

the care system. As a covered a hidden world where parents are subjected to lies and blame by authorities across the UK as they struggle with the needs of traumatized children who have often suffered abuse and neglect before they removed from the birth fumily is I'll tell you more about the birth families later. Parents speaker of being threatened, harassed, and parents pushed into mental health crisis. Well one of doubt. The teenager who returned to care says that was more

supports that with more support his family might still be together. Now. Yeah, I think that's the word as well in brackets support. The News here conducted the most extensive freedom of information requests ever into adoptions that are broken down, finding that more than a thousand adopt the children in the UK have returned to cand the past five years at twenty twenty to twenty twenty five. That's a very high figure than the figure and the recent government report, but the

true number is very much bigger than that. Yeah, so that's adoptive parents haven't having problems. A thousand adoptive parents are more. They've been returned to souchial work care now on the back of this report. As a commentant commenting person, so they commented, and I think I'm going to read this out to you as well. The UK pretty much only permits adoption up until the age of six, which I find to be a ridiculous requirement. So many children are not in a position and not ready to be

adopted at that age. So that but I don't get because the UK pretty much only permits adoption up into the age of sixt that bit which this person finds to be a ridiculous requirement. Okay, but this bit, so many children are not in a position not ready to be adopted by that age. Does that mean they need to be adopted later after they're traumatized, because you know, they've known their parents longer. Do they need to be more traumatized for them to fit in the adoption system.

I don't know what this lady's trying to say. Please let your mind bugle with that and leave your comments down below on YouTube please or any other social media platform. They should open it up and put the decision back into the children's hands. Now that's a good idea, and give them the power whether it's plus and decide if they want or not want to be adopted. Yeah, that'd

be good. Then they can be placed with families opening for adoption or begin meeting perspective families the US to be adopted by the age of six is not a good system, very true. It certainly doesn't help that far too many adoptive pants are twisted and hoping adopt, then we'll heal their trauma, which is using infertility. On top of this, many wanted to just adopt little babies like a blank slate. So, yeah, you don't adopt because you've got a problem with your fertility. You don't adopt because

that suits you in your bloody lifestyle. There's also a huge lack of support for adoptive families. Yeah, well, there's not a lot of support ever for theological families. They have unique needs and complications that require a lot of community support. Yes, so do we the biological families anyway, we're talking about the adoptive families. Then there are the original families, which, yeah, I've just mentioned. I advise anyone to see how dangerous, u hinged and scary families can

be when they have had their children removed. You can see groups on Facebook, she says, called social workers Exposed Forced adoptions every town in this country, Peterborough, London for adoption activists on Facebook and all these little ones. Yeah, forced adoptions edinburn's arm and they're threatening, you know, with

personal information social work as well. I don't agree to, you know, break the law, but you know, if they've done wrong, why not publish their details, but in a nice, calm, constructive way that you know you did wrong, we're going to do about it, rather than you know, you don't do nothing naughty to them. Of course, some are perhaps innocent, and there are innocent biological families, and they didn't deserve

to have their children taken away. However, if they're able to make contact with the children part of their adoption, they can really get their heads and turn those children toxic. Well, no, they don't turn the children toxic. Deliberately the biological parents when they're going to care and they're going to be adopted, they do it because they're traumatized, and the biological parents have added chance to recover from that traumatization, which I'll

explain a little bit later on. And it says basically, from start to finish and beyond, it's a cycle of misery and toxic born from the trauming pain that begins. You know, it's a sad state of affairs. Like everyone, the birth parents search work as the adoptees. The adoptive parents are constantly award of each other, rereading and worth editing that the adoptees are not sharing equal blame as they deserves no blame of alill they never ask for

any of it, especially when they are still in their minor. Yeah, well I kind of agree a little bit with that last bit. I mean, nobody wants once any of that, do they? But and then of course, hundreds of thousands of unmarried women were forced to give up their babies for adoption, and they should receive a government apology. Well I don't know if they've had the apology by now, but fucking hell, part the language, why shouldn't you have apologized by now this is my daily vant Maine said

the odd swear word, and I shouldn't I did. That was the motive subject inquired by the Joint Committee and human rights were set up followings of reports by and these channels. One hundred and eighty five thousand women in fifty sixties and seventies were shamed and conhearsed into giving up their babies. And yeah, and ever since then, of course you've had the natural forced adoptions by birth parents.

So they started off in the early fifties, sixties and seventies, taking mothers away from babies, away from mothers that weren't married, didn't have a lot of money, blah blah blah, and now they're still doing it. Forced adoption around the world is happening because governments don't care. People are too traumatized and too weak. I mean, one guy I've met many times forced adoption dot Com, Forced adoption dot Com. He's got a couple of books in Joseph. An amazing guy.

He sums it up. He's next county counselor from Kent in England. A lady came to him one day saying, look, I've got problems. Can you help me? They sacked him because he's trying to help people, and he's saying and this is true. It's a punishment without a grime. Baby's

taking at birth for risk of emotional abuse. How can you predict that you're gonna harm your child in the future if you're harming him now, or yeah, lose your children go to jow you deserve it, But how can you predict in a crystal ball it's a future risk of emotional harm? Toddler's take at six am by squads have ununiformed police and social workers for this that may

never happen. Whether those who putict the fouture used to tart cards, crystal balls, or tea leaves is the material because the fact is that parentfully their child to care for risk of events that may never happen by gone to government stats are far more likely to happen under state care, so not the birth parents. These children would be damaged in state care than from loving imperfect parents. No parent is perfect, but they try their best. And a lot of reports that I can't tell you right

now because it's on the internet anyway. Sue Reader is one of them from the Daily mail of ten fifteen years ago reported that children are better off in an imperfect family situation than being in care. And of course it's the family courts that make most of this real and they shouldn't do because you know, they listen to the liars, they're not bothered about what the parents are saying. By the time the parents get to speak, it's actually am I over for them, so the night mayor begins.

When social workers act like a second police force, punishing parents have not committed any crime. They do this by obtaining an emergency care order in the parents' absence. Often they take away the children for care. They claim these children have a suffered emotional harm or worse, still at risk of it in the future. On this basis, an order is nearly always granted without permission. It's disgusting. Of course.

The kangaroo culture and the legal aid lawyers, known in the trades as professional losers use bised clients to listen to the social workers. If that rings a bell anywhere? Yeah, And then there was this what do they know? Request? Yeah, they wanted to know. Do social workers conceal child abuse? Telling children that their parents don't love or want them, telling children their parents are dead. We're moving children from

parents and allegations not believing children when they disclosed abouse. Yeah, because they like children care. Even nowadays, they get sexually assaulted or raped by a professional or a care and everyone looks the other way. Bloody, help out of my language. Stop parents seeking meddle advice to bring attention, you know, like Munchan's there's no People may be worriers, but they're

not doing it deliberately. They may go to hospital, they may get a doctor for medication for reasons they don't understand. You know, why is my child being bruised? You know all this already, the shaking babyb syndrome, all this stuff. Now, this is all this stuff. There's a link between social workers, police in the court trying to take children away because, as Maggie Turtle said many years ago, from children's screening to be heard, it's a multi million pound industry and

it really is. I could go on this subject a lot more, and I indte you to email me Freedom Talk Radio twenty thirteen at gmail dot com. I really do help you to email me Ami, and and I just want you to share your story and we'll get your word out there. On the Internet and YouTube live at the moment on Twitter X on Facebook, on riverside FM. I love you guys. Please support the channel on YouTube. I hit the bell, like, share comment, and of course I have a good day for now. Oh yeah, I

was gonna say. And of course you know I read every comment that you provide. Yeah,