"COVID-19: A Second Opinion" - Part 1
Jan 26, 2022•1 hr•Ep. 6
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more
Episode description
Since this event was only available by video and difficult to load, I made it available via podcast for greater access.
Background
On January 24, 2022, U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) held a panel discussion, COVID 19: A Second Opinion. A group of world renowned doctors and medical experts provided a different perspective on the global pandemic response, the current state of knowledge of early and hospital treatment, vaccine efficacy and safety, what went right, what went wrong, what should be done now, and what needs to be addressed long term.
Reference Outline
- Dr. Peter McCullough intro and opening statement - 10:00-16:00
- Dr. Ryan Cole intro and opening statement - 16:00-20:00
- Dr. Harvey Risch intro and proof of Hydroxy efficacy - 20:00-26:30
- Dr. Pierre Kory intro and proof of Ivermectin efficacy - 27:35-37:15
- Dr. Richard Urso and ability to treat w/o HCQ and IVER - 37:20-44:15
- Question: Why aren't Dr.'s treating COVID? - 44:15-45:50
- Question: How many Dr.'s present received censorship? - 47:00-47:36
- Dr. Christina Parks on spike protein toxicity and impact on blacks - 47:36-52:45
- Dr. Mary Boden, regular physician's perspective - 52:45-57:35
- Dr. Harpel Mangat - 57:45-continued in Part 2
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android