#23. Feeling Heard. What is the Research Around This Integral Concept? - podcast episode cover

#23. Feeling Heard. What is the Research Around This Integral Concept?

May 01, 202418 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

On this week's Firefighter Craftsmanship podcast we’re going to talk about communication and how to build better teams and feel more connected. "Feeling Heard" is a concept all of us have experienced both in a positive sense and a negative one.

In this episode we cover:

  • What are the entities involved in feeling heard?
  • Why is feeling heard such a big deal and how does it tie into employee retention?
  • The research that supports it and how it impacts overall success and increases organizational culture

We hear you!

Transcript

We've all been in situations where we walked away and felt great about a conversation. We've all also been involved in situations where we haven't. Those conversations where you just knew it was a complete waste of time and you really didn't feel heard. And now it's pretty much just followed up by frustration. Feeling heard is an integral part to your happiness, engagement, success, and building great teams. It also plays big in retention of your employee base.

Once we understand the science behind this, we can progress in how we communicate, how we listen, how we band together, and how we accomplish great things in emergency services. Welcome to the Firefighter Craftsmanship Podcast where we coach you to deal with the stressors of the job as a first responder, as well as how to thrive off duty. My name is Kevin Housley, a Human Performance Coach and a firefighter since 2005.

I've been able to coach over a thousand emergency responders on ways to be more resilient, better prepared for the job, and how to be happier and healthier at home. And feeling heard certainly plays into all of those things. So let's get to it. Today's topic, feeling heard, what does the research say? And this is going to be a two part episode. So let's dive into the research, a little quick hitter episode for you today.

I've had a few conversations over the last few months and thank you to all of you that have reached out and looked for some extra resources or had some questions. Happy to help however I can. But a common theme has been across all of those conversations, no matter where they're coming from across the country has been, I just really don't think about my feedback is actually being heard.

It's falling on deaf ears, or I'm really, really frustrated because it seems like sometimes the decision has already been made. And then they ask for feedback later, even though the decision has already been made. And so let's look at what the research says from a psychological perspective on how can we be better communicators? How can we make sure that we feel heard and then that we make sure that those around us up and down the chain of command feel heard.

So when we look at communication and feeling heard, there are three entities specifically and everybody that's involved in that communication has these same three entities, but obviously they're going to have a little bit different view. The first entity is me. So if you and I are communicating, I have me, but you also have me and those two things are very, very different. We both also have you.

And so when you have a two person conversation, we have a me and a you, but our me and you are actually mirror opposites of one another. And then we do have some consistency in the third entity and that is we. So we have a me, a you and a we. And all parties involved have these same foundational entities.

And we really need to acknowledge that and maybe connect some dots of, okay, this might be why sometimes communication doesn't go as well as planned or where one party thought that went great and another party didn't think it went well at all. So if we look at this in a rank structure specific to emergency services, this can kind of compound the complexity of this when there's a power dynamic, when we have a me, a you and a we. And I've talked about this before of we all are on the same team.

It doesn't matter what your rank is, what color shirt you wear, if you have brass on your collar. We're all on the same team. And that's where that we would kind of come into play very, very heavily. And unfortunately, I know some of you work in organizations where there is a very, very big divide against the me, the you and for sure against the we.

And we need to continue to try to break down those things and build positive relationships because at the end of the day, we provide a pretty integral service to our communities. And it's not about a piss and match at your organization. It's about going out there and meeting the customer's needs both internally and externally for the things that we said we were going to do.

So this is a two way street and really, really must be recognized that, hey, if I'm trying to lead up the chain of command, well, as I do that, that individual also has a me, a you and then a we. And obviously their perspective is going to be a little bit different based on the level they are with the organization. Especially when you get budgets and things like that involved, that complicates things even more.

For talking about this off the job in your personal relationships, same exact concept applies with a me, a you and a we. And once we start to really realize this of, hey, same team, you know, I'm trying to meet your needs. These are the needs that I need to be met. And then here are the things that we're doing together to create this we cohesive team, very, very important. And so we can start to kind of break these things down a little bit.

And there's quite a bit of literature to support all of these things. And today's reference comes from a study titled Feeling Heard, operationalizing a key concept for social relations by Ruse and colleagues. And within this study, they broke down the feeling heard scale and created this new thing called a feeling heard scale. And actually had two studies specific to this concept. And those studies covered almost 1200 participants.

So that was a pretty good sample size that created some validity, as well as they also did a really, really good literature review of kind of the concepts of what is feeling heard mean and how do we positively communicate to get the job done. And so today's episode, we're going to dive into the literature briefly, what supported that and where they started was with relationships. And they looked at a bunch of different literature around relationships specifically.

So for us in emergency services, we obviously have relationships off the job. But we also have this kind of weird and unique dynamic based on what sort of organization you work for, where some of us actually live together for at least 24 hours at a time, or you might have that partner where you're assigned to and you might be doing 10 or 12 hour shifts, but you're working with that partner that creates a relationship.

When you're riding around in an ambulance or a police car, or something along those lines that is just completely different than if I have a relationship interpersonal relationship with somebody in a business office. It just is different. And some of that difference is because of what we do, what we see, the traumas that we are involved in the nature of the business that we signed up to do.

And so I think a lot of this really, really applies even though it's about relationships specifically and a lot of these were intimate relationships, we can easily say, hey, in emergency services, we have intimate relationships with those that we work with. And that actually probably makes cohesive high performing teams. So the big thing that came out of literature about relationships specifically in feeling heard was perceived responsiveness.

And that was defined within this study as the belief that close others understand and value one's personal needs and goals and are supportive in fulfilling these. It is essential about a person's perception that intimate others see them for who they are and accept value and support that.

And we can look at any of our human resources training along the way or how are we successful or not successful based on relationships we have with people at work and really it boils down to are we being accepted or are we accepting them for who they are? And do we accept value and support that thing? That's where a lot of our conflict kind of comes from is we might not feel valued or we might not value that other person. And we end a relationship because of that.

So the second literature that they kind of dove into was healthcare specific. And once again, this kind of crosses over into the job of emergency services, which is very interesting. And really what the foundational concept out of healthcare specifically was, well, how do we provide great care? Well, this is obviously important for that external customer. But also how are we providing great care to each other when we're building quality cultures and quality teams?

And the thing out of healthcare research that they looked at specifically was active listening. And they defined active listening in the study as it puts the patient center stage and aims to help them achieve and pursue their own needs and goals. So meaning, you know, if I'm a provider and you come to me, let's say I'm a talk therapist and you come to me, well, I'm kind of actively listening. And I'm really putting some of that back on to you of, all right, well, what are you going to do next?

What are you going to, how are you going to work through this? And you're kind of helping them down that path. And I'm not a therapist. But for my experience, going to a therapist talk therapy, that's how I kind of perceive that is, you know, they're putting that back on you, the onus is back on you, they're helping you figure out how to solve those problems. But really it's self empowerment and solving those things by yourself with a team of people around you to support you.

So we I would call that empowerment, right? So in healthcare, we really try to empower people, whether that's a physician right in a medication, whether empowering that person to get ahead of their diabetes, let's say, or if it's a talk therapist, they're empowering them to take control of their own identity of self and all of those different things. All right. So I think we all have lots and lots of examples of not active listening.

And we probably are not active listeners quite often because of that stupid smartphone in our pocket that just when it dings, we have to look at it. So if it dings in the middle of a conversation and I look at it, well, that would be an example of me not actively listening to my children or my wife or my crewmates or whatever that would be. And so I mean, I think really, you know, there's a lot of barriers to communication just from technology alone.

And one of those things where I would consider not active listening is if you have your cell phone, but it's not put away, it's in the line of sight, maybe it's laying on the table, right? Or if I'm actively checking the phone like I've already mentioned, or if maybe I'm sitting there working on my computer and I'll tell you like, oh yeah, I'm listening to you as I just keep plinking and plunking away on my computer, that's not active listening.

And I had an experience today where, you know, there was a Zoom meeting that was happening and there was very clearly not active listening from one of the participants at a multi-person Zoom meeting participant. They were obviously working on something else. And so that just kind of, maybe that's okay for you, but it also kind of creates that like, well, then obviously this isn't that important to you. So right away, I'm probably not going to feel heard. So just start to pay attention.

Are you an active listener? Are you engaged? Even if you disagree with that other person, are you able to actively listen to what they said? So even though the me might be like, hey, this is complete nonsense, we have to remember that other person has a me entity as well. And so I really need to focus on the you entity. If you're talking about something that I adamantly disagree with, I need to focus on the you entity.

And so that way I'm supporting your me entity to feel like you're actually being heard. Finally the literature that they dove into was organizational and law literature. And so obviously once again, this really, really applies to us and emergency services and to those of you that are maybe in the business world, the organizational world.

And the biggest thing that came out of this literature review was voice, the concept of voice, of the person that was speaking, did they feel at the end of that conversation like they actually had a voice? And was that voice heard?

And I think that over the last few months where I've had some of these conversations where people are very frustrated about communication and not feeling heard, almost all of them have said, I don't feel like I have a voice in this organization, or I don't feel like we have a voice in the organization that decisions are being made, blah, blah, blah, blah. I've also had some conversation with some pretty high ranking people who also feel like they don't have a voice.

So once again, we have that concept of a two way street, regardless of rank, we can feel like we may or may not have a voice regardless of where we are in an organization. And so there's a huge power dynamic to a voice, which we really, really need to be aware of in emergency services. And the way that they define that in the study was to experience voice. Subordinate should feel able to let their opinions and feelings be known and taken into account by those making decisions that affect them.

Importantly, this does not require, quote, the perception of actually influencing the decision. In organizations, experiencing voice tends to increase engagement, satisfaction, and social identification with the organization. And right there, I think is a huge point for all of us that are maybe struggling with recruitment and retention specifically retention is an organization's experiencing voice tends to increase engagement, which means more work is being done.

You have happier people on the team, satisfaction, they're crushing it, they're stoked to come back tomorrow and social identification with the organization of, hey, do I belong here? Is this a part of who I am? And is this a part of the things that I want to do day in and day out and work for? Very, very important finding right there out of that organizational literature review. So start to think about voice.

And if you're frustrated in your organization, does it come down to do you feel like you don't have a voice? And if that's how it is, well, you're the missing entity for you is that me entity, you're feeling like that is a missing gap.

You might have a good entity with the you where you're working really, really hard, you're trying to lead, you're performing great, great customer service out on the streets, performing great customer service in the stations in your organization itself, that would be a you. And then you might even say, hey, we are working towards a common goal of this or my crew is working really, really hard, but there's something missing where I just don't feel heard. And maybe it's that voice gap.

And so those conversations I've had recently, looking back now after doing some literature review and checking out some of these studies, that is the missing piece is the voice. So organizationally, how do we start to fix that? And if you're in a level of power, you have to understand that because you have rank, it does change the power dynamic a little bit.

And so how do we break down those barriers a little bit and say, hey, ultimately, I do control the purse strings and I have the checkbook, or ultimately, I get to make this final decision about whatever the issue is that's coming up, or this committee does.

Okay. But how do you take away some of those rank structures and those things that are actually getting in the way to good, solid quality communication, which is tying back into engagement, satisfaction, and working towards a good common goal. So as always, this research study will be linked in the show notes here. This one is free out there. So you don't need a subscription to check this thing out. You can nerd out on some of this stuff all you want.

On the next episode of the firefighter craftsmanship podcast, we're going to go into what are the five components of being a good listener and of making yourself and others feel heard. So you'll check that out next week. That'll be released on Wednesday next week. Looking forward to that. Please send us some feedback. Hit us up with questions. Always happy to help however we can.

If you're interested in what firefighter craftsmanship can provide to you personally or provide to your departments, please reach out to us at firefightercraftsmanship.com or ffcraftsmanship.com. And we would love to explore ways to work with you and your organizations. So please consider rating review on the firefighter craftsmanship podcast. You can give us up to a five star review on your favorite podcast player. Thank you to those of you that have already done that.

It's the only way that we can grow this grassroots podcast and continue to share some human performance psychology resources. We really, really appreciate the support more than you will ever know. So go ahead and smash on that follow button in your favorite podcast player as well so you never miss one of these weekly episodes. See you next week. Stay smart.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android