Before Sunrise/Before Sunset, Nostalghia (Tarkovsky #5) - podcast episode cover

Before Sunrise/Before Sunset, Nostalghia (Tarkovsky #5)

May 23, 20251 hr 58 minEp. 1015
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Adam and Josh revisit BEFORE SUNSET for its 20th-ish anniversary and share their conversation about BEFORE SUNRISE, which followed a 30th-anniversary screening earlier this year to close Filmspotting Fest. Scott Tobias (The Next Picture Show, The Reveal) and Producer Sam Van Hallgren joined them for that. Plus, the final film in the Andrei Tarkovsky Marathon, 1983’s NOSTALGHIA.    

This episode is presented by Regal Unlimited⁠, the all-you-can-watch movie subscription pass that pays for itself in just two visits.

(Timecodes will not be precise with ads; chapters may start early.)

Intro (00:00:00-00:01:56)

Pantheon Project: “Before Sunset” (00:01:57-00:37:39)

Filmspotting Family (00:37:40-00:40:02)

Next Week / Notes / Massacre Theatre (00:40:03-00:50:29)

Filmspotting Fest: “Before Sunrise” (00:50:30-01:20:46)

Pantheon Induction (01:20:47-01:23:27)

Tarkovsky #5: “Nostalghia” (01:23:28-01:53:27)

Credits / New Releases (01:53:28-01:56:39)

Links:

-Filmspotting Pantheon

https://letterboxd.com/filmspotting/list/filmspotting-pantheon/detail/

-Filmspotting Fest

https://www.filmspotting.net/filmspotting-fest

-Andrei Tarkovsky Marathon

https://www.filmspotting.net/marathons

Feedback:

-Email us at ⁠⁠feedback@filmspotting.net⁠⁠.

-⁠⁠Ask Us Anything⁠⁠ and we might answer your question in bonus content.

Support:

-Join the Filmspotting Family for bonus episodes and archive access.

⁠⁠http://filmspottingfamily.com⁠⁠

-T-shirts (and more) on sale at the Filmspotting Shop.

⁠⁠https://filmspotting.net/shop⁠⁠

Follow:

⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/filmspotting⁠⁠

⁠⁠https://letterboxd.com/filmspotting⁠⁠

⁠⁠https://twitter.com/filmspotting⁠⁠

⁠⁠https://facebook.com/filmspotting⁠⁠

⁠⁠https://letterboxd.com/larsenonfilm⁠⁠

⁠⁠https://twitter.com/larsenonfilm⁠⁠

⁠⁠https://facebook.com/larsenonfilm⁠

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Speaker 1

What kind of a show you guys.

Speaker 2

Putting on here today?

Speaker 3

You're not interested in armed now? No, Look, we're going to do this thing.

Speaker 4

We're going to have a.

Speaker 5

Conversation from Chicago. This is film Spotting. I'm Adam Kempinar and I'm Josh Larson.

Speaker 3

So listen, here's the deal.

Speaker 2

This is what we should do.

Speaker 6

You should get off the train with me here in Vienna and come check out the town.

Speaker 2

What come on, it'll be fine.

Speaker 7

Thirty years ago, Jesse met Selene on the train to Vienna, and the rest is movie history.

Speaker 5

This week, we spend a night and a day with Ethan Hawks Jesse and Julie Delpy Selene as we revisit both nineteen ninety five's Before Sunrise in two thousand and fours Before Sunset.

Speaker 7

And our Andre Tarkowski marathon concludes with nineteen eighty three's Nostalgia.

Speaker 3

It's all ahead.

Speaker 5

You're going to miss that plane, Josh.

Speaker 7

I don't say that I actually have a plan to catch on film spotting.

Speaker 8

Just you man.

Speaker 5

Welcome to film Spotting. It's a nice bit of coincidence spotting this week, Josh, which we may get into more later. We're closing out our Andre Tarkovsky Marathon with Nostalgia, and we're embarking on a little bit of a nostalgia fest ourselves by revisiting two films from our past. Two films we love Richard Linklater's Before Sunrise and Before Sunset.

Speaker 7

And Nostalgia for our film spotted Fest, which is only a few months old.

Speaker 5

That's right, exactly. Back in March, we closed the first ever film Spotting Fest with a thirtieth anniversary screening of Before Sunrise. That was that the Music Box in Chicago, and that was pretty magically.

Speaker 3

You're right.

Speaker 5

I'm already reminiscing about that day. On a Sunday back in March after the movie, critic Scott Tobias from the Next Picture Show and The Reveal joined us along with our producer Sam Van Halgren to talk about the film. We'll share that conversation later in the show, along with the conclusion of our Tarkovski Marathon. All that and Massacre Theater.

Speaker 7

First, we're going to mess with the chronology a bit here. I don't think link Later would mind. He has a habit of doing that himself. Before Sunset it celebrated its twentieth anniversary last year and we're revisiting it now as part of our Pantheon project. This is our effort to review every film in the film spotting Pantheon. And I like how Sam is phrasing this here eccentricly assembled movie.

Speaker 3

Hall of Fame. I think that's accurate.

Speaker 7

And sounds sounds kind of nice. Before Sunset, along with the other two films in the Before trilogy, was added to the Pantheon back in twenty sixteen. That's when we did our Top five Richard Linkletter scenes. Three of your top five, Adam were from the Before trilogy, including two from Sunset. I think I had two picks from this trilogy in my top five. Before Sunset came to theaters in June two thousand and four, nine years after its predecessor. The movie went on to become one of the best

reviewed of the year. Unlike the first film, which was written by Linklater and Kim Krizan, Sunset is credit I did to stars Hawk and Delpy along with Linklater. And although we may think of the first two films in the trilogy as having similar structures, there's a couple walking

and talking over a single day or a night. In the case of Before, sunrise before sunset is meant to take place more or less in real time, basically the ninety or so minutes before Hawk's Jesse, now married and a successful author, is scheduled to catch his plane back home from Paris.

Speaker 3

Let's hear a clip. Look, I'm just so happy, all right to be with you, I am. I'm so glad you didn't forget about me.

Speaker 1

Okay, No, I didn't, and it pisces me off. Okay, you come here to Paris all romantic and married.

Speaker 3

Getting screw you.

Speaker 1

Don't get me wrong.

Speaker 2

I'm not trying to get you or anything.

Speaker 9

I mean, all I need.

Speaker 8

Is a married man.

Speaker 1

And there's been so much water under the bridge.

Speaker 9

It's not even about you anymore.

Speaker 1

It's at that time, that moment in time that is forever gone.

Speaker 10

I don't know you say on that, but you didn't even remember having sex, so sorry remembered.

Speaker 8

He did?

Speaker 11

Yes, women pretend things like that.

Speaker 1

I don't know they do.

Speaker 2

Yeah, what was I supposed to say that?

Speaker 4

I remember the wine in the park and us looking at the stars fading away as the sun came up.

Speaker 3

We had sex twice, you.

Speaker 5

Idiot, even though I was in full on pretentious film guy mode in nineteen ninety five, or aspired to be anyway, I couldn't claim to be a Richard linklater fan. I'm not one hundred percent sure I knew his name at that point. Growing up in Iowa, I definitely wouldn't have seen Slacker yet. And even though I surely had seen Days and Confused, I didn't know enough to know it

was great. I probably plucked the Before Sunrise VHS case off the shelf of my local video store on the strength of that sexy cover Ethan Hawk and Julie Delpy facing each other, arms intertwined, and Hawk, who I remembered from Explorers, loved in Dead Poet Society and may have even enjoyed in Waterland when I was going through my Jeremy Irons phase. Yes, dear listeners, I swooned over it.

In this age of endless IP, it's hard to imagine anymore getting over protective about movies and the sanctity of certain characters and stories. But when I heard that Link later planned to make a sequel, I was shaken. On one hand, by this point, I did know enough to know that Days and Confused was great, and yeah, Before Sunrise was brilliant and waking life blew my mind, so Linklater had earned the credibility to go back to that

artistic well. Also, a major part of Before Sunrise's brilliance is how much you enjoy just hanging out with Jesse and Selene. Of course, I'll take any opportunity to spend more time with them. On the other hand, Before Sunrise was perfect, with an ending that was perfect. Why would link Later risk ruining perfection? All my fellow gen xers who were worried about George Lucas destroying their childhoods a few years prior, well, Linklater was possibly about to destroy

this exer's young adulthood. The filmmaker frames the dilemma pretty well himself and before Sunset in the opening sequence, at the bookstore, Jesse, who has written about his personal experience with Selene, just as link Later had transformed his personal experience with a woman he met on a train traveling through Europe, naturally gets asked the big question, do the two characters get back together again in six months like

they promised each other, to which Jesse evasively but eloquently replies, it's a good test, right if you're a romantic or a cynic. The implication seems clear enough. If you believe they met again in Vienna in six months, then you're a romantic. If you believe they didn't meet, then you're a cynic. I was sure they met again in six months, but I was also sure that I was perfectly content

to let Jesse and Selene live on forever. In my imagination, the possibility of that affair to remember future meetup was satisfying enough, or so I thought, Josh, how did you fare on the before test? Are you a romantic or a cynic? And how grateful are you that Link Later and Delpy granted us more time with these two.

Speaker 7

Here's my level of cynicism, as best as I can recall seeing this in two thousand and four is I was less thinking about what I wanted, but thinking about what is link later? What is the answer link later is going to give in this movie that I'm currently watching that's going to be satisfying. I was too much in my own head and maybe not lost enough in

the characters' heads, despite having loved Before Sunrise. I think at the time I was probably, you know, folding my arms a little bit about the sequel question you know, working at that point as as a film critic, and also you know, just wondering why is Link Later someone like Linklater doing this. But I do think the movie must have won me over pretty quickly, because the lead to my eventual review was when talk is an aphrodisiac who wants the conversation to stop. So whatever skepticism I

had the movie overcame for sure. I think I still probably did not appreciate it as much as I should have at the time, and that's what made this revisit so wonderful, and the knowledge that there's still a before Midnight, which now I want to revisit again and likely discover that I underestimated that one, even though I liked it, but far less than these two installments. The first two installments. Yeah, they pull off something of a miracle here, and they

do it so lightly, so seemingly effortlessly. Yet when you watch this conversation unfolding over these ninety minutes closely, you realize how intricate and strategic it is, and how it shifts and ebbs and flows in ways that I imagine

improvisation was involved. But I think there had to be long discussions among the three of them about the superstructure and the journey that they want these characters to go on over the course of before sunset, and then just laying out how they're going to shift from one step to the other, and then maybe allowing the improvisation to

get them there. But this is something of a miracle in the way they make it flow so naturally, rooted in the same characters we know so intimately, and achieve something so monumental and complete and cohesive coming down to this perfect ending as well.

Speaker 3

So yeah, that was that was my.

Speaker 7

Memory of my first encounter with it, and even appreciating it at the time, now realizing I underestimated it at the time.

Speaker 5

Yeah, how about that not only pulling off the miracle of making another masterpiece, and I think it is after making one with the first film, but another perfect ending, which is what happens here.

Speaker 7

Even a better ending, maybe even a better ending.

Speaker 5

And I realized this time too, it's the exception to the rule of sequels, which is and I'd forg this. I hadn't seen this film, I think since twenty thirteen, that's at least the last time I logged it. That was in preparation for before Midnight. I had forgotten that early on in the film we see flashbacks, we see cuts back to the first film, and that is a dead giveaway with sequels that if they're cutting back to footage from the first film, then you know it's a disaster.

Speaker 7

Let me tell you. After having just come out of Final Reckoning a few days before, to be reminded that this was an element in before Sunset, I was like, oh, boy or boy, yeah, but so lenage to even redeem that, I.

Speaker 5

Know, link later again just proving all those conventions wrong. But it really isn't by accident. It is all in the structure. And can I just say I love that there's a moment and I didn't clock where it exactly happens, but maybe it's about twenty minutes in on their walk they have not hit I think it's still before they finally hit the cafe that that Selene is ragging Jesse to where they're going to sit down and talk. After they've left the bookstore and they're talking, and finally Jesse

just stops and says, you know, this is surreal. This is surreal that we're talking after all this time. And I love that the movie takes that beat, because for every one of us who have waited nine years to see these characters get back together, Surreal's the only way to describe it. We're feeling the same way those characters are right to see them back together having these kinds of conversations.

Speaker 7

Yeah, and confronting that is not just a meta element either reverberating the audience's desires. It's also how that conversation had to go, because this was not Jesse and Celine until they get to the point of brutal honesty, dropping off facads and just going at it. And this is another thing where watching this again and I'm looking up as you were talking, and I think I did revisit it for that list as well. Last time was about a little over ten years ago, but I had forgotten this.

It starts a little shaky here for me at least, and it's a rough start maybe for any of us who thought Jesse was a bit pretentious in Before Sunrise, because we open just on him people fawning over him at his book signing as he waxes philosophical and I'm thinking, oh boy, this is like, this is like the worst of Jesse, and we're leading.

Speaker 3

With this but it's all a setup.

Speaker 7

It's all a setup, I believe, because it's making us realize that when Selene shows up, we see how integral she is to who he is, and that this is the magic of these movies. It's who they are together that is what matters. What is what these films are about. It's that chemical space between them. It's not about either individual. She You know, she starts to she's nice about his book release and everything, but also starts to call him out on his BS, but she also appreciates the dreamer

who's behind the b right. She brings out the best in him, he brings out the best in her. He calls her on some of her bs. And then you see, here's the other element. The way he looks at her gets us to fall back in love with him. So I really think that link later is setting us up by shoving Jesse in our face in the beginning.

Speaker 3

And maybe you.

Speaker 7

Know, some people are more positive on him than others, and maybe it's not an issue for them, but at least for me, kind of setting me up for not and then reminding me of what the magic of these movies are about. And it's that honesty that you were getting to Adam when they their connection reignites when they get to the question of if either one of them went to the meeting spot. Right, these who have never

been about niceties or pleasantries. It's about honesty. And yet here's where I'm talking about the ebbs and flows and the rhythms. So brilliant to have that moment come early on after the pleasantries. But then brilliant also picked them backing their way into it, right with him saying he did show up, then confessing you know when she says she didn't, Oh, no, he didn't either, and then admitting he did. Think of the mini drama.

Speaker 3

Over that to get to that truth.

Speaker 7

Because until they get to that truth, they're not Jesse and Celine. Yet that's when they become they are.

Speaker 5

No, that's when the movie really takes off. With ever that, let me take a few things you said, and I'm gonna take it maybe a little bit further, because this was the revelation for me, if you will, maybe too strong of a word, but I'm gonna go with it for now. I didn't rewatch this movie back in twenty sixteen for the link later scenes list. I did in twenty thirteen again for midnight, And at that time I chalked up the conceit of the film to Jesse stalling.

You know, I wrote on letterbox in twenty thirteen, I said it in twenty sixteen. During that top five, is it me or are Jesse's repeated attempts to delay his trip to the airport the equivalent of the knights gamesmanship in the seventh Seal, a condemned man's maneuvers to stave off death by prolonging the sublime. He just keeps saying, right, oh, fifteen more minutes now, I'll just take you here. We'll just go here. He's just trying to keep it going.

And something struck me this time, Josh. What clued me in was the fact that early on there's multiple references to time and not being late and you got to catch your plane, all before they've even kind of stepped out of the bookstore. And she knows this, and yet they're talking about where they're going to go for coffee, and she says, I've got a spot and I don't know if she says it's nearby, but she says, you know, I've got a spot I want to take you to.

And they start walking, and they must walk for a half an hour, right, And so that of course could be link later and Hawk and Dealthy being a little bit cheeky, and I wouldn't put that past them, but I think it does connect to what was the revelation for me, and what I think might tie to what the answer was in some way as you were getting

at for link later, what made it interesting? What made it interesting for him to collaborate specifically with Hawk and with Delpy on and before anyone listening to this thinks, really, Adam, this is a revelation. You didn't pick up on this before, I'll just say I think this may have been my third viewing of the film. Only the second time was back in twenty thirteen, and in twenty thirteen, I wasn't watching it to discuss it. I was just prepping for

before midnight. I was just refreshing myself. Also film spotting Pa Sophie Kempenar already chastised me. I got up the next morning all eager to share with her what I learned watching the film again, because she loves these films and actually had just been in Paris and followed all these steps took all of the picture she could from all of the places they go to. And here was her response, I'm a better film critic than you. This is before sinset one oh one. Wow, harsh kids say

the regardest things. Okay, there is a major structural difference, and it's not just the temporal aspect, the real time or more real time approach, and I think it does change the overall experience of the two movies. And it goes back to what you're saying in terms of the reversal of the setup a little bit. Jesse really does drive the first movie. Yes, of course the first movie is great because of their honesty and that Delpy doesn't

feel like she's playing second fiddle. But Jesse is the one who gets her off the train, who makes the first move, who does initiate most of the conversations and what happens here. Selene drives the second one. She drives this movie. She picks him up at the bookstore. She essentially gets him to leave the train. Otherwise he's just getting in the car and going to the airport.

Speaker 3

Right.

Speaker 5

She gets him to wander around Paris and Josh, she initiates almost all of the conversations. He is a responder largely in this movie. So, especially if you were someone who thought he was a little pretentious in the first film, you probably do prefer this movie. And he is. I had this same thing in my notes. Jesse Ethan Hawk is largely relegated, and I don't think this is a bad thing at all. I like the different dynamic between

the two films. He is largely relegated to being a watcher in this movie, and that is fine because we got plenty of his pontificating in the first movie. Delpy is also so good and so incisive, and he is such a good listener. Also, the way he watches her is romantic as hell, which is how the movie ends, of course too, in that very sexy romantic exchange between them, where except for one word or two words, that two word phrase that he has, otherwise he's just looking at her.

Speaker 7

Yeah, And there's there's a structural reason for that, for that shift, but there's also a psychological emotional one, you know, because he's vulnerable here by admitting that he went back and that he's the romantic. He can try to play it off and she can try to play it off too, But it has revealed that he opened himself up more than she did. Bottom line, whatever the circumstances were, her grandmother's death and that, you know, it's it's all understandable.

This isn't sane. One of them made the right decision, one of them made the bad decision, but he is now the more vulnerable one because of how things played out. And I think that's part of what's going into the dynamic as well. You know, as you were talking about, you know, time and the considerations of time, which is a huge linkinator thing, but just how it plays out in this I just want to throw in also about the ending the great Nina Simone song, it's actually a cover.

She's you know, singing a jazz standard that's been on stage and in movies before.

Speaker 3

She covered it. Just in Time is the name of that.

Speaker 7

Stuff, of course, and I looked up the lyrics just out of curiosity.

Speaker 3

Just in time.

Speaker 7

You found me, just in time before you came. My time was running low.

Speaker 4

Before you came, I was lost.

Speaker 7

So the first the first two stanzas time mentioned three times, it's you know, clearly probably why it was chosen. It's also musically perfect for the moment and Delpi's performance in that moment. Since you touched our performance, let's go there, and I'm going to start at the ending because I'm here now. It's not only that it's seductive. But let's go back a little earlier, a few moments earlier, where she's playing her waltz. I think she calls it this waltz for him.

Speaker 5

It's that's how great is that?

Speaker 3

Yeah?

Speaker 7

And she's on the guitar, and you know, I think what I love about that little bit is that you see she's doing it for him, And there are moments where she'll look up at him and kind of self deprecatingly laugh.

Speaker 3

But there's also nice.

Speaker 7

Little moments in the performance where she gets lost in the music. You can tell like she's no longer thinking about him in these two seconds. She's thinking about how much she's enjoying doing this musical performance, and what does that point to. She's an artist too. This is related to the kind of shifts in the dynamic from the first film to this one. Listening to this again, maybe an obvious observation, we'll see if Sophia has something mean to say to me, But listening to her lyrics, you

realize this waltz is her version of Jesse's book. He's written this book all about their relationship. She has been true to her nature, quietly alone in her apartment writing a song she will probably never perform to anyone else about her experience of their relationship because it is about someone who she, you know, basically missed out on or there was a fleeting moment, and that's that's her version

of the book. So Delpy is wonderful in so many different registers in that final sequence, and then she just gets some great saline moments throughout because she gets, you know, more of the dialogue here in a sense I love one of my favorites might be I'm not getting angry, I'm not getting angry. Spitthead him twice, which is, you know, just kind of sums.

Speaker 3

Her character up in so many ways.

Speaker 7

But she's she's wonderful, He's great, She's wonderful. Together, there's something even better.

Speaker 2

Let me sing you I owes.

Speaker 3

Out of nowhere, out of my thoughts.

Speaker 2

Let me sing you O oldes.

Speaker 8

About this one night stand.

Speaker 2

Well, for me, that night.

Speaker 9

Everything I always drammed.

Speaker 7

On in line.

Speaker 5

What I love about that is I did register the bit of performance that it is. But I didn't make the connection back to the fact that he wrote a book, and this is sort of her version of that. And the reason that I registered the act of performance is I looked at my top five link later scenes. Sam had referenced it in our script notes, and so I figured, well, man, now that I've rewatched the movie, did I make the right choices? And we'll get to One of my choices

was probably here in a little bit. My number two choice was that ending and baby, are you going to miss That plane? Which followed my number three choice, which was from before Sunrise where they do that whole fake phone call thing with each other. It's all about acting and performance where they finally get to say what they really are thinking about each other, but they get to do it under the guise of performance because they are sort of playing a role even though they really are

being themselves. So there is that connection or that link between the artifice and what they're really exposing about themselves in the two films. I had never fully noticed this before, Josh, and it might be a really minor thing, but that last line here, I am again I think being a romantic, and I realized that maybe I need to temper it again and maybe not go full blown cynic, but just temper the romanticism a little bit. I always took that last line, baby, you're going to miss that plane as

full on I'm not letting you go. You know you're not leaving. We both know we're meant to be together, and this is the romance of our lifetimes and our dreams, and we finally found each other again after nine years.

Is in everything great? And I realized with Delpy's line delivery that you at least have to keep open the interpretation that it's just a statement of fact that at this point, baby, you're going to miss that plane, that he is almost certainly going to miss that plane, and the door, the door for him leaving is at some point is still open literally and metaphorically. And I love that there is that possibility dual meaning.

Speaker 7

Well, there's she has a level of defense before just coming out and saying it that you're going to miss that plane. I want you here, we want we should be together. Because she delivers that line as part of her Nina Simone impersonation, she's not delivering it as Selene.

Speaker 3

That's right.

Speaker 7

Conversation that is allowing them to be honest, but in the guise of performance. I think I read this similarly. She's being honest, she wants them to miss that plane, she wants them to stay romantically, but she's still buffering it with performance. There's just a little bit of safety there. She's you know again, how she's maybe distinct from Jesse. She's not allowing herself to be as vulnerable as she could by delivering the statement in that way.

Speaker 5

M hm, I love too. This is another thing I never really paid attention to. The shot and the scene right before they arrive, right before they get a to the apartment, the deliberation, the care that link later takes that they take. The performers as they walk up the stairs, that spiral staircase seems to take forever, and there is a sense of anticipation. There is a sense of anxiety too though, because I think they both they both know that they don't know what they're about to get themselves into.

We don't know, and they are not aware fully of where this could take them. But I think they fundamentally get that once they cross sort of a threshold, that threshold being the door into her apartment, who knows where this could lead? But it's a place from which they maybe can never fully come back from. And I just the way you watch Hawk with his sort of wide eyed he almost looks like a kid, but there's also the kid on Christmas morning, but also a little bit

afraid of what he's getting into. You see it all, and it's just a single steady cam shot that follows them up the stairs. It's really beautiful.

Speaker 7

It's to me a direct callback to one of my favorite link later scenes from before Sunrise, the listening booth, because what it is built upon are them taking turns looking at each other when the other one is not and looking away, and each note hits what you're describing, the hesitancy and the excitement. There are smiles and then there are smiles that suddenly fade. They do catch eyes, but not the entire time. They're not locked. And that exact back and forth is what happens in the Listening

Booth in a very similar situation. It's where they're considering how serious is this? In that listening booth, they're asking themselves the same question in this staircase. And there are a couple other callbacks, or at least one other couple instances of a particular callback. I know we've talked about

the touching, yes, or almost touching. I want to go Leen's hair in before sunrise, we talked about, you know how this is possibly stolen when we sense watched and discussed Agnes Vardis Clay from five to seven and Clo and Antoine that happens with them. I think it's on you. No, it's on the tram here and before sunrise where Jesse tentatively reaches out for Selene's hair and then takes his hand away. I love the moment where they're walking up

some stairs and these leaves are falling around them. It's kind of like an outdoor staircase, and he reaches out. I rewounded a couple times, and I almost wonder if it's improvised, because he reaches out and it looks like a leaf maybe is falling behind her head, and you can't tell if he knocks it away or grabs it or just pulls his hand back. But then she does it, so now it becomes here. We're back to the dynamic flipping in the car. Near the end, she reaches out

to just touch his head but stops. So just a lovely callback to one of this series's loveliest moments.

Speaker 5

Yes, and that really stood out to me this time. That was my number five. I referenced it earlier. My number five was the car scene link later scene. I was fine until I read your effing book. And what's so great about that scene is partly that that's where it really does get real. They're being honest with each other in different ways. It builds throughout, but it builds to this scene where they both get brutally honest with

each other, where the emotions come out. Remember, she at one point really wants to get out of the car. He has to almost restrain her from getting out of the car. Right.

Speaker 7

I think it's where she's her most vulnerable. It's why it gets so real is now she has put herself in the same position he was when he admitted he came back and tried to.

Speaker 5

Be Yeah, and at one point, I think earlier in that scene, he almost touches her to try to comfort her. It's not quite the gesture that she's going to make, and it's not quite the gesture he makes that everyone remembers from before Sunrise. But then after he finally exposes his vulnerability and reveals how rough his life is at

the moment. That's when she reciprocates, reciprocates the uster from across almost a decade now and across movies to before Sunrise and Josh, what stands out about that is that it's not just link Later being clever and going well, Jesse did it in the first movie, So Selene's gonna do it here. Of course she's the one who's doing it here. She's the one who is driving the entire film. She's the more active, dominant presence. It makes sense that she would be the one who would almost comfort him

in that moment. But there's more. Remember his line earlier in the film, and I'll just say this too. There is something I had also kind of put in the back of my brain about this film, thinking about it as purely romantic, even though knowing that there were moments of brutal honesty. There is a certain melancholy and bittersweetness that they bring up over and over again about the nine years they lost. I didn't really latch onto that, but that is real this why didn't we do this?

And that regret those nine years being gone? And Hawk says, not too long before the scene in the car, if somebody would touch me, I would dissolve into molecules. That sign that then raises the stakes when she almost touches him. Right, it's not just that that it's reversed and that she's the one. It makes sense would do that as the dominant presence. But what if she does touch him there.

Speaker 7

Well, they have and they have that hug, and she asks him, doesn't she are you dissolving her something along?

Speaker 5

She calls back to it. She does. I wanted to ask you this or bring it up, and I'll throw it out to the listeners too, because I just ran out of time at the last minute, and I guess it's kind of silly to bring up something that I could just answer myself. But doesn't before Sunrise end with kind of a lovely little montage of the different locations.

Speaker 7

Visiting the travel Yeah, so here's another reversal.

Speaker 5

Doesn't before on set actually begin with hitting the spots that they go to. It's like it's foreshadowing. It's setting you up rather than looking back, which is lovely. And what clued me into that was I saw that they go to the cafe. I saw the sign of the cafe, and I started to realize oh, some of these spots are familiar, and of course those are the spots they

end up going to. So something about the camera they're telling us ahead of time link later cluing us in ahead of time, as if this stuff maybe was almost faded in some way and laid out before us. Just seems so perfect, especially with all the conversations they're having about time and everything happening sort of simultaneously.

Speaker 7

Yeah, a nice touch and also a nice counter to how this movie ends, which is then a fade to black as action is still taking place, but it now becomes private.

Speaker 2

You know.

Speaker 7

It's like we we need to leave them to be together now, and this movie needs.

Speaker 5

To end another nice little flourish And this is what all clothes on that bookstore moment when they ask him a question about what he's working on next, and Jesse goes off on this thing he'd always had wanted to write, and he's waxing about how time is a lie and yeah, and the pop song, the pop song. Everything's happening within

that moment somehow. But Josh, it really is a beautiful thing that I never fully hear again put together that he's narrating this story and what he's saying, is all his life is just folding into itself, and it's obvious to him that time is a lie, that it's all happening all the time, and inside every moment is another moment,

all happening simultaneously. And at that moment, he's saying that is when he sees her, And so he's having this moment where he's thinking about a book that he might write at some point, but it's also a book that he's thought about many times throughout his life. He's seeing her, which is happening in the present, but then he's probably potentially thinking about, who knows, a future, a future with her that might even just be the next twenty minutes

of them reuniting. But then he's thinking about the night they had nine years ago, and we always thinking about that because of course he is. But also Link later shows us those memories in his head. All of it's happening simultaneously, time collapsing in that moment.

Speaker 7

Yeah, and I like how she's you know, she's almost a vision there standing there where you do, which I think almost He does a little double take.

Speaker 3

Is she really there?

Speaker 7

Is this really like she's somehow transported through time? To be there, even though it's completely logical that she is. I said, I was going to close there. But two other just really quick things.

Speaker 5

At the beginning of Before Sunrise, they have that Mary couple that gets into a fight with each other, and then here you have Ethan Hawke saying that line about the couple being divorced at fifty two. And it's just interesting to think about those two encounters that exchange at the beginning of Sunrise and that line here in Sunset as we look forward to what may happen in Before Midnight. The other thing that is a totally random aside, but it just kind of strikes me as hilarious. And I've

mentioned this one time on the show before. You may remember, Josh, that I discovered pretty randomly actually that back in twenty seventeen or something, PBS did a documentary about Richard Linklater looking at his career up to that point, and I found out that, unbeknownst to me, they used audio from the early days of sinecast that you can hear my voice in Sam's voice in this documentary. They don't ferent cynecastory thing. It's just part of a montage. But Sam

has a couple lines. I have one line, and we're just dogging link Later, right, So I'm getting ready to watch before Sunset, and of course I'm doing what most of us do. Now, I'm about to bring it up on some VOD platform and then I go, wait a second, I have the Before Trilogy on Criterion. I should put the disc in. I watch it, and then I think, well, I've got the Criterion disc. I wonder what the bonus features are. I go to the supplements. The first supplement

is this PBS documentary. Oh no, And I go, wait a second, are you kidding me? Is this no? Is this the thing? And I start fast forwarding through it, and there it is. At the seventy one minute mark, they're at the point where they're they're doing this montage, this really quick montage talking about how link Later was at this point in his career where he was kind of unbankable. He'd had some movies that weren't making money and critics weren't big on them, like Bad News Bears

and Fast Food Nation. Though ironically I liked Fast Food Nation. I think Sam did too. And there it is. I'm finally on a Criterion collection disc. I'm featured not so featured. But you know what I mean. I'm included in a criterion collection disc of one of my all time favorite films, and it's me insulting the filmmaker because I'm tearing down

the bad news bears. That not really fair, but there it is to hot then Before Sunset is currently available VOD on most platforms and in that shrink wrap Criterion collection edition of the Before trilogy you have in case of emergency.

Speaker 7

Listening is the number one thing you can do to support an independently produced show like film Spotting. There are a couple more things you can do. You can take a minute to give us a rating or a review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Doesn't matter if you're a first time listener or have been listening for twenty years. Every new review helps us reach new listeners. Another way

to support us the Film Spotting Family. At film spottingfamily dot com, we want to thank family member Susie in Saint Paul.

Speaker 5

Susie writes she's been listening for years. Her favorite review or segment Top five movies with beaches or did I Dream That Not a Dream? Josh Episode eight thirty four, Top five beach scenes inspired by m Knight Shamlan's Old, which it says we did not review, but I don't remember doing that Top five. I feel like you talked about Old and maybe maybe you had a guest.

Speaker 3

There might have been a guest.

Speaker 7

Yes, I know I've reviewed it, and I think I've talked about it on the show.

Speaker 5

A review we got wrong. You didn't get it wrong. But watch Josh O'Connor in God's Own Country and you will be enthralled.

Speaker 7

We believe we do. Can we just do a Josh O'Connor Mini mariyth. I feel like there's a handful we need to catch up with both of us.

Speaker 5

There are listeners around the world right now. Fist pumping, I hate you said that. A favorite that she revisited recently, Twelve Angry Men, a random film she loves, Scorsese's After Hours movie she credits with becoming a sinophile. I think this is one for a lot of people out there. Cinema Paradiso, and a book about movies that she loves, Get Happy, The Life of Judy Garland. Thank you, Susie for being part of the family and for all those years of listening. In addition to keeping us doing what

we're doing. Your support comes with perks. You get to listen early in ad free, you get our weekly newsletter, you get exclusive opportunities like being part of the Film Spotting Family discord, and you get access to our monthly

bonus shows. We did just drop in the feed our quarterly Film Spotting Advisory Board meeting and coming very soon the May bonus show that we just recorded our draft with Madness Bracket contest winner Ricky Kendall, directors who are no longer with us, which was a blast.

Speaker 3

A lot of fun.

Speaker 7

I think we mostly came away happy everyone, all of us.

Speaker 3

I feel like a.

Speaker 7

Recent draft went that way too. We've got to pick a more contentious topic for our next drive, maybe so we get some anger going.

Speaker 5

You can learn more about joining the Film Spotting Family at Filmspotting Family dot com.

Speaker 3

Our lives are the sum of our choices. This is we're calling your destiny.

Speaker 5

I have no regret ansession you. That's from the trailer for Mission Impossible, the Final Reckoning, which comes to theaters this weekend. We do plan to have a review of that on next week's show, but not with you, Josh, because you will be off in Japan with your lovely bride of how many years at this point are you here to share?

Speaker 7

I mean it long enough that it sounds very strange for you to say bride, But yes, I don't.

Speaker 5

That's why I asked you to clarify.

Speaker 7

Debbie and I have been married for thirty years. So we're doing it big and spending about two weeks in Japan. Really, Actually, the truth is I was not allowed to be on this show because I really strongly disliked the Final Reckoning.

Speaker 5

I was going to say, you have a reckoning with this installment of the Mission Impossible franchise.

Speaker 3

I hope, I hope. You know it seems mixed.

Speaker 7

So I'm hoping either you or Michael do go for it and have a good debate about it, because I know there are big fans of the series that this one did still work for.

Speaker 5

We will see. My guest host will be Michael Phillips from the Chicago Tribune. Along with a review of The Final Reckoning, we will share our top five movie stunts. That's a tie in with the Mi films, of course, but also with the recent ish announcement that the Oscars will be including a best Stunt category starting with the twenty twenty eight ceremony. Here's where I'm at, Josh, right now. I recently posted in the film Spotting discord what is

a movie stunt? What qualifies learn? Are the parameters?

Speaker 3

Oh man?

Speaker 5

Are their technicalities?

Speaker 7

You're lost in the weeds already.

Speaker 5

I'm already lost in the weeds.

Speaker 2

You know.

Speaker 5

Does it have to be a human who's involved? Are we allowed to think of them as stunt sequences? Or is it a single event? It's tough.

Speaker 7

You're gonna have to get back to me on that, or I'll just listen on my flight back.

Speaker 3

Yeah.

Speaker 5

Also, next week, results from the current Film Spotting poll. We're asking you to choose the single greatest actor or actress from the last twenty five years currently in the lead. Apparently people were swayed by my choice the number one overall pick from our draft of the actors of the Century. You can vote in that poll and leave a comment at film spotting dot net, and if you would like to check out our schedule of future shows, visit filmspotting

dot net slash episodes. Josh, you're out for two weeks. You're also going to have a meetup with a good group of film Spotting listeners in Japan, which will set the record for the farthest flung film spotting meetup congract.

Speaker 7

Wait, yeah, it's gonna be in Tokyo and we have I thought, what are the chances do we have anyone there? At least ten folks have signed up to join us, So yeah, we'll definitely be reporting back on that or follow us both on Instagram and I'll be sure to put up some pictures.

Speaker 5

If you go to film Spotting dot Net slash episodes, you'll see that after Michael, Aisha Harris is going to join the show really fun show plan with her Clueless for its thirtieth anniversary, and our top five movie quotes. Movie quotes in our lexicon like the phrases that we actually use or have used regularly in our lives. So it might be a lot of inside jokes and we'll just look at each other with blank faces like we don't know what you're referencing.

Speaker 7

We'll see your family's and close friends will get a kick out of it, so that's all that matters.

Speaker 5

That's exactly right. Again, that's Film Spotting dot Net Slash Episodes.

Speaker 7

Quick note about our sister podcast, The Next Picture Show looking at cinemas present via its past. It is part two of their Less than Hero pairings. So they're discussing the latest MCU installment, which is getting been getting pretty good reviews Thunderbolts. Previously they discussed nineteen ninety nine's Mystery Men, so they'll really do some of the compared and contrasting on this new latest episode. You can find those every

Tuesday wherever you get your podcasts. Time now for Massacre Theater, where we perform a scene and you get a chance to win a film spotting prize. Last time we massacred.

Speaker 3

This scene, I believe the most likely outcome will be our collective demise, not if we strictly follow the rules of time travel.

Speaker 10

It means no talking to our past selves, no betting on sporting events.

Speaker 2

I'm gonna stop you right there, Scott.

Speaker 10

Are you seriously telling me that your plan to save the universe is based on.

Speaker 3

Back to the future? No good.

Speaker 1

You have me worried there, because I'd be worship That's not.

Speaker 3

How quantum physics works, Tony.

Speaker 11

We have to take a stand.

Speaker 10

We did stand, and yet here we are. I know you got a lot on the line, got a wife, a daughter, but I lost someone very important to me, A lot of people did, and now now we have a chance to bring her back, to bring everyone back.

Speaker 1

And you're telling me that you won't need this, right.

Speaker 7

Scot, I will speaking of the MCU that was Robert Downey Junior and Paul Rudd, as well as a few others who we didn't perform. The scene comes from twenty nineteen's Avengers Endgame, written by Stephen mcpheeley and Christopher Marcus, directed by Anthony and Joe Russo.

Speaker 5

That massacre was part of our Top twenty five Films of the Century show a couple of weeks back. Endgame did not make either of our lists. In fact, not a single MCU film made our list. Josh, so, why that scene? Well, of course, listeners have answers.

Speaker 7

Here's Dylan dom in Blair, Nebraska, the highest grossing movie of the century, paired with the best.

Speaker 5

Robert Gibbons in Kaysville, Utah. Has a good answer. The connections are one, it is the top grossing or one of the top grossing movies in the last twenty five years, which ties into your best of lists. Yeah, And two you found a way to bring back the movies that were destroyed in film spotting Madness, just like the Avengers brought back the people snapped by Thanos.

Speaker 7

Indeed, here's Addison Alley from Salt Lake City, Utah time heist. I am expecting a brimming infinity go let of answers for this Avengers Endgame scene, a movie that was actually so good for its time that it retroactively made people believe the MCU had been nothing but masterpieces before that point, and prospectively mediocre and terrible. The charm of scene massive Superhero team ups has since faded, But g boy, howdy did this work in twenty nineteen?

Speaker 5

And here's Michael Rosch in New York, New York. Of course, the scene is from that obscure little film Avengers Endgame, the tie in besides the obvious oversight that kept the film off. Both Adam and Josh's Top twenty five of the last twenty five years include the MCU's own meta look back. Also, Downey Junior won an Oscar last year for a film by Christopher Nolan, a director who showed up on both of your lists. I also believe you renamed Scott Lang Peter as a nod to Paul Rudd

being in the newer Ghostbusters films. Peter, of course, was Bill Murray's character, and you opened the show on a Murray monologue from Lost in Translation. Funny that didn't we go with Peter because we were just thinking about I love you man.

Speaker 7

I think that's a and Spider Man and Peter Parker. But but yeah, this works just as well.

Speaker 5

That works actually the best. We'll go with that, Michael. Thank you. Josh, go ahead and reach into that pretty brimming film Spotting hat and pick out this week's winner.

Speaker 7

Our winner is Dave Allen from Parts Unknown, who yeah joins in with the Thunderbolts praise, saying here, I'm not sure if you guys are planning to watch a review Thunderbolts, but I think it's the best Marvel movie since shan Che.

Speaker 5

How about that, Dave. We don't know where you're from, but we will if you send us your address, get you a film Spotting t shirt or a film Spotting tote bag, or a trial membership to the Film Spotting Family. Email us feedback at film spotting dot net.

Speaker 3

How did I come to this?

Speaker 10

Not again?

Speaker 3

Five natural one? Look at me? I want to say that stupid line one more time.

Speaker 5

We move on now to this week's edition of Massacre or a Theater. I'm gonna give everybody a hint, because I don't think the hat's going to be very brimming. We're apparently obsessed with this movie here on Bone Spot. I'm just gonna leave it out.

Speaker 7

In a little last minute research, we appear to have done a scene from this film about a year ago.

Speaker 3

So there's a clue for you.

Speaker 7

We didn't discuss this beforehand, but we need to swap in a name here in your last line.

Speaker 3

Do we want to go with?

Speaker 5

I got one?

Speaker 3

Okay, you got one? All right, We're gonna go surprise me there.

Speaker 5

I think I think that this is potentially another hint if people are really paying attention, I.

Speaker 7

Was actually going to suggest the same thing, okay, on the same page, on the same page there, and also here, I'll give another hint. If you have already listened or will soon listen to our film spoting family bonus episode about a draft of dead directors. This title, I believe is mentioned the film. Your absolute comes up quite a bit. We'll say that, okay, okay, I think we'll hopefully we've dropped enough our performances will be of no help at all.

Speaker 5

They will be of no help. And I am going to point out that I have once again been typecast.

Speaker 3

I mean this that or it's your your strength. Well, no, it's not your strength. We could just you're just.

Speaker 5

We could go with that. Okay, I'm gonna start it off. You're gonna give me the action and action. Oh but you have that look, dear, I can always tell now you haven't been doing anything foolish. M m, well, I do hope you've forgotten all about that silly little plan of yours, which one about blowing up the White House.

Speaker 7

Oh ma, I was only fooling. Besides, what would the president say?

Speaker 5

You're a naughty boy, Sasha. You can always make me laugh. Now get shaved before your father gets home.

Speaker 3

Wow, and see, man, I don't know it is.

Speaker 5

Maybe it is a position of strength.

Speaker 7

If you add giggling, I think it becomes a position of strength.

Speaker 5

Nicely do if you know what film we just massacred, email the movie's title and your name on location to feedback at film spotting dot net. The deadline is Monday, junifverse Robert Downey Junior last week, This this week, range course the winner randomly from all the correct entries and announce it in a couple of weeks.

Speaker 2

Ring ring, ring, Ring, Ring, ring, Pick up, pick up the phone. Hello, Hello, ven Selina, Seva bien et.

Speaker 5

Shows that quiet.

Speaker 10

I've been working on my English recently.

Speaker 4

You want to talk in English?

Speaker 6

Just for laughs?

Speaker 5

Yeah, okay, that's a good idea.

Speaker 1

I don't think I'm going to be able to make it for lunch today.

Speaker 7

Selene and Jesse again, this time in nineteen ninety five's before Sunrise. We revisited Sunrise just back in March. That was part of Film Spotting Fest. We closed out those wonderful three days Adam with a sold out Sunday morning screening at Chicago's Music Box, and then after the screening, we hauled ourselves back up on stage. You and I were quite exhausted, but we leaned on producer Sam and critic and friends Scott Tobias to talk about the film.

Speaker 3

Here is that audio.

Speaker 5

We're excited to have Scott Tobias, our friend from the Next Picture Show podcast and from the Reveal, joining us to talk about, as you heard, one of my all time favorite movies before Sunday. Scott, thanks for joining.

Speaker 2

Us thanks for having me. This is great.

Speaker 12

And look at all these people stick it around for your Q and I like a bunch of sickos.

Speaker 3

Yep.

Speaker 5

Funny I mentioned Friday Night with Ryan Johnson. You know how Brick is one of these films where it's all taking place in high school and there's one cell phone in the movie, and how different the movie would be. Now, this is the ultimate pre cell phone movie, right, pre social media film.

Speaker 12

I think you'd have to in order to I was thinking about that, and I think the only way to make it work is if they both somehow drop their cell phones into the Danube, and then I think maybe you could have this work.

Speaker 7

You do wonder how do the kids meet these days? Like if they don't carry around books that you can say, what are you reading? It's like what are you looking at on your phone while someone's dancing?

Speaker 3

I mean, you know, hey, yeah.

Speaker 5

So, before we dive into the movie a little bit further, we've been talking to all of our guests about kind of this is the twentieth year of the show, right, so reflecting a little bit and want to share with the audience our relationship actually to you, Scott, and I guess we'll get it a little bit, your relationship to us, but your tenure with the AV Club give us the years just so we can kind.

Speaker 12

Of I met my longtime partner and friend and editor and current cohort Keith Phipps in nineteen ninety seven at a junket for Goodwill Hunting and Scream two. I was in college graduate school, and he was working for the AV Club. He was part of what was a skeleton crew of three at the time, working out of Madison, and they were just starting up the Chicago edition and needed somebody to do the local part of that. I did not get that job, but I did start freelancing for.

Speaker 2

Them, and they came up in nineteen ninety nine.

Speaker 12

Was there I think until two thousand and twelve or twenty and fourteen, I can't remember. And then we started the Dissolve together, which lasted for a couple of years through Pitchfork and now we have The Reveal, which is their newsletter.

Speaker 2

Yeah.

Speaker 5

So between ninety seven and two thousand and five when our show started, all three of us are reading the AV Club, reading Keith reading Tasha Robinson reading you, and we're thinking about, man if we could ever get guests on the show. Would we ever get a guy like Scott Tobias to pay attention to us? Honestly, that what we thought undred percent, And I think you were maybe

the second ever guest host that we had. You actually said yes and came on the show, but even before that, you listened to the show to decide whether or not you thought it was worth it, and then you wrote something very lovely about us in the av Club that we had no idea was coming, but for us back in six whenever it was, it was very validating. So thank you. It was.

Speaker 12

It was great, and I have to say you reached out to me at first, I think when it was cinecast and I was like, what is this I'm not gonna do, And so it was, you know, just a matter of you listening to the show and being completely blown away by how good the discussion was, the quality of the production, the quality of the insight, and of course it was something I was happy to recommend and then join for as a guest episode about Knocked Up.

Speaker 2

I believe was what we.

Speaker 5

Thought right, Sam was off you join joined me for that one twenty fifth anniversary. We'll sit down and have a conversation. We'll devote an entire panel just to the legal dispute that caused us to change our name to film Spotting, because I know everyone dying to hear that. But yes, we did start as sinecaster first one hundred episodes, so before Sunrise. What was your relationship to it at the time that came out. Tell us about your first experience.

Speaker 12

It's really kind of perfect because I am the same age as the characters in the movie. I think Selene says she's twenty three. I think that would have been when I saw it. I was one year out of school. It was kind of towny at that point in Athens, Georgia, and I saw the movie at a screening at college, like at college screening, and at the time link latter was extremely exciting. This was, you know, because yes, Slacker had come out while I was an undergrad, like it was ninety three.

Speaker 2

Was days to confused.

Speaker 12

You didn't mention, of course, I wasn't aware of his actual first film, which is what the uh?

Speaker 2

You can't learn to plow by reading books.

Speaker 12

But in any case, I was a bit of a ethan hawk skeptic at the time, but I was completely wowed by the movie and extremely moved by it, and I remain so this was powerful to see, and it's extraordinary to me that the sequels exists. That was one of those people where it was like, Oh, there's going to be another Before Sunrise movie.

Speaker 2

I think ten years later I was like, no, what are you doing.

Speaker 3

This is a horrible idea.

Speaker 12

Then, of course it turns out to it was not a horrible if anything, if anything at least is going to be even better than this one.

Speaker 2

So but I feel like, you know, I've grown with it. And one of the things that I really appreciate.

Speaker 12

About the film is that it is such a chronicle of a specific moment of a person's life. They have to be this age in order to have this kind of experience, in order to have that impulse to get off the train, in order to really engage not just in each.

Speaker 2

Other, but the idea of doing this, I think, is very specific.

Speaker 12

To that time and where they are in their lives, and this is a film that captures that feeling so intensely.

Speaker 5

I think I just saw it on DVD or VHS, maybe even at the time in ninety five, I had to wait. It was not coming to my small town theater in Iowa.

Speaker 2

What was your experience, guys.

Speaker 3

Yeah, for me, it was definitely a college movie.

Speaker 7

I was in college at the time, so would have seen it then, And you don't remember liking it, but probably having a little of that hawk skepticism even though so reality bites you were saying, Adam was just before, right just before.

Speaker 3

And which I liked.

Speaker 7

But it's kind of, you know, you look at him kind of like she does in this movie, a little askance at first, even though you are mesmerized by what he's saying. And so it's probably a movie that I warmed up to. But I think that's the right relationship to have with this film. As wonderful as it is to see at a young age, it's when you're maybe a little closer to that couple on the train that this movie starts to kind of burrow deeper. And it was, you know, maybe not until I don't know, I'm teem

viewing for when we talked about it. For some maybe it was one of those top five lists. I looked at it again, Adam, but realizing you, does she know when she gets up to move away from them, that in twenty years, you know, before midnight, you know that she's going to be playing a variation of that scene with him. So spoiler sorry for those who are just seeing this the first time, like a.

Speaker 5

Love little journey to go on everybody, Yeah, we promise.

Speaker 7

All that to say is it's a movie that's wonderful if you see it at you know, thirteen or whatever, but you're gonna love it a lot lot more down the road.

Speaker 3

When did you see it?

Speaker 1

So, so I would have been twenty. It came out, you said, a limited release in the summer, so I think I had kind of an ideal viewing. It actually did come to the small theater in my town in central New Hampshire, in the Lakes region, and probably it was a lovely, you know, summer evening, and my mom

and I went to see it together. So I just feel like, you know, what I was thinking is I was here, is like, this is a film I've seen many times, but something was missing all of you, right, just like Delpy says, there was something special about seeing it here, deeply moving and of course you can't extract this from the entire before enterprise at this point, the

three films and what they meant. I think the last time I saw it was maybe right on the heels of midnight, and I was thinking about it before this morning. You know, if any of us are in relationships that are at all stable, happy, however you want to talk about it, maybe the last emotionally risky thing we did was initiate that conversation, that first date with the people we're still with, right and this movie, and we'll get into maybe our favorite moment, so I'll save it next.

But this is a movie all about those moments of taking little leaps, of embracing that risk. And so what it makes you think, you know, more than what makes it special as a movie is make it and how you end up reflecting on your life, My life at twenty, life at you know, at nearly thirty, at in my forties, and that's what makes this whole thing such a special thing.

Speaker 5

Yeah, for all you non gen xers out there, all you kids, you know, congrats on your youth, but you you didn't get to have Jesse and Saline mark the stages of your life the way we did, right, And I really do value that and feel that that's that's something really special. You set us up, Sam, I think we should we should talk about it. There are so many great moments to choose from. We did do a

top five link later scenes. We should have just done scenes from this trilogy, and maybe we can revisit that at some point. What's your favorite moment in the film, What is your favorite scene? We can kind of go down the road same did one? Did one stand out this time? Is it different than what maybe you thought it was going to be going in?

Speaker 1

There are three and a right to not scenes moments, So these are moments, and these are all wordless moments. And I realized, actually very late that what made me be able to take in these moments is that there's no score. There's music, but no score. In fact the harpsichord. I was like, oh there is a score. No, no, it's a real harpsichord the garden apartment. So there are three moments and they all capture what I was getting at the terror of encountering the real Oh shit, this

is real life. And the first moment is when Jesse decides to first say something to Suline, and there I don't think it's my imagination. There's a subtle push in of the camera right before he says something, so you see the choice he makes and It's like, these are the moments where you can't not be sincere. This is such a gen X movie. Sincerity was not something we were great at. We didn't love that still are.

Speaker 12

So.

Speaker 1

So there's that moment and you see it on his face, and again the camera really helps with that. There's that little push in the listening booth scene. Obviously great.

Speaker 5

So you're gonna take all of it.

Speaker 1

I'm not gonna take the scene. I'm not gonna take the scene. I'm just gonna There is a moment, so the music starts. God, what a great scene. God, But there is a moment the music started. As soon as we hear her voice, Selene is startled. There's a moment where she almost shakes because it's the voice again is singing with such sincerity that I think it wakes her up to the reality of the moment. And and we've all felt that that little shiver of what music can

do and being in that moment with somebody. The third moment, right before the kiss, it's right before the first kiss. They're on what what is that called that they're on? It's like a it is a fairis wheel, Okay, it has a European name, probably but it's very famous.

Speaker 2

It's the way from the third man.

Speaker 1

Oh sure, right, of course, the moment right before they actually kiss, there's been that whole great exchange about like, you know, he's trying to make it cute. You see on his face. There's no other word for it. It's terror. He's like, this is real, We're really doing this, this is meaningful. And again, the lack of score. I think a score would erase those moments or your ability to connect with those moments. It's so nakedly exposed and they're

so good at capturing it. Those are my three favorite.

Speaker 5

Moments between she talks about later you need it, and the music would ruin that great, great film.

Speaker 3

So yeah, lack of score.

Speaker 7

I'm going to talk about moments where there's lack of dialogue and there's an irony there with you know, Linklater, who is such a verbose filmmaker in so many great ways. But when we did our you mentioned ad on top five Ethan Hawk moments. This was episode six ninety six. I picked on the tram that early moment where he tentatively reaches out to fix Salim's hair and then stops himself because it's the pause for me.

Speaker 3

That's romantic.

Speaker 7

It's the it's the acknowledging of where we are right now and we're not there. And so I'm going to pause. And we when we did uh just talk about our Pantheon review Adam of Cleo from five to seventh of ARTI film, we were talking about how that extended tram scene between the two of them, there is, you know, obvious inspiration for this tram sequence.

Speaker 1

So and the Palm Reader, did you guys think of that too? That's right, the Palm Reader, which is opens ives of seven.

Speaker 3

Start to the Power. Yeah, yeah, I forgot about that.

Speaker 5

Sam.

Speaker 7

That's good, and so the other one. And I have the receipts for this, so I'm claiming this and I can prove it. Sorry, Scott, but we did link later scenes on five to eighty one. My number one all his filmography, listening Booth.

Speaker 3

It's the listening booth.

Speaker 7

And it's again no words, a word, one word. You're begging that no one says a word, because one word from two of them would ruin that.

Speaker 3

And the way we're allowed to read into their reactions.

Speaker 7

I don't know if there's any interviews that talk about rehearsals that went into that or did link later just throw them into the booth and trust them. You know, their chemistry is obviously one of the major elements of this movie. But yeah, to just to let that play out, and then the choice to end it, which I had forgotten again watching it today, but that it doesn't conclude, but that song continues as then we get a few

shots across the city. So yeah, for me, it's always going to be the listening booth.

Speaker 2

I was like, Nobod's gonna take the listening booth, I'll salute.

Speaker 3

Yeah.

Speaker 12

I mean one thing another thing I will add about the listening booth before choosing something else is I think when you have that experience of just saying this is a really cool song, you want to listen to it. It's the most awkward thing in the world you could

do just to stand around and listen to this. And this is still a reasonably they still don't know each other terribly well, but there is desire that and so you get all of that, You get that feel of you're so uncomfortable being in that space together, yet you're feeling the flirtiness and the desire and everything is all sort of done wordlessly, and the just as performance piece.

Speaker 2

Just watching those two actors in that scene is incredible. But I'm just go ahead and let that one go to me. It's the it's it's a phone call, uh, the because you know, it's it's.

Speaker 12

So funny and adorable and romantic. But I also love how that exercise allows them the opportunity to say how they really feel about each other and talk in whether they could not have accessed any other way and so, and it comes at a point, you know, a little bit later in the film where where they're feelings for each other have really intensified. And yeah, that's the one for me.

Speaker 5

I was sure thinking about this earlier today that I was going to say the listening booth as well, because it's it's incredible. Yeah, I have no other options here, thanks guys. But the the interesting thing too, I noticed this time. I never really thought about it before, but Sam, the kiss follows on the heels of that, and I don't think the kiss happens at least at that point in the movie, that point in their day, if we don't get the listening booth scined first.

Speaker 7

It's right, it't happen in the listening booth either. No, that's yeah, that would be be interruptive as a word said.

Speaker 5

We need to know, they need to know, they need to have that shared experience, that they both want it, even though they're they're not directly communicating it. And that's why I think he feels not only like he has to, you know, he needs to do it, but emboldened to actually try. I think it follows the listening booth. So I look back at my link later scenes and I thought again that would be number one or two, and actually that was an honorable mention, my first honorable mention.

So my number one link later scene was the one you just mentioned, Scott. It's the fake phone call scene, and it is because of the honesty. And you think about those first dates, Sam, you've mentioned that when you build up the courage to ask someone out, most of us probably don't have first states that are quite like this in the movie.

Speaker 3

You know, they're being pretty.

Speaker 5

Open with each other, but you're not open, You're not honest, You're not truly honest on a first date. You're still presenting a version of yourself, the best version you can possibly present. And as honest as they are being with each other, that's the moment where they finally get to really understand how the other feels about them, and they only get to do it through the artifice. They only get to do it through the mechanism of play acting.

It's theater, and the other element of it that I love is that she says, she reveals that, if she's being honest, the moment she really fell in love with him was when he was telling the story on the train about his grandmother passing away. And the thing is Link later. Of course, being the one who wrote the script, he shows us that. He tells us that go back and watch it that close up when they cut to that reverse shot of her, the camera is just slightly closer.

We really haven't seen Delpy quite that close. We haven't seem Dealty that beautiful. There's something about just the way she's tilting her head. It's in the performance too, but between performance and what Link later is really subtly done with the camera.

Speaker 2

We see it on her face.

Speaker 5

We read that like, that's the moment she's.

Speaker 1

We not only see it, but we remember it when she mentions it later that that's the moment. We already knew it was.

Speaker 5

The moment so time I was I was shimed. I don't know why I was shocked by this, because I do love Richard link Later movies and would have thought, of course he's going to deal with time. But it's really like the basis of every conversation to have in this film isn't.

Speaker 1

Every twenty minutes it comes up. I mean, I think the first time is when he's talking about his documentary idea for cable access or whatever, and.

Speaker 5

I'm thinking about Boyhood and ead Evanquility go on to do something kind of like.

Speaker 1

It, but it's like, oh, yeah, just hits you capital t time and then it comes up over and over again. Yeah, that it's already very much on his mind.

Speaker 7

And this space they have because it's a limited time space. I think that's another reason for the honesty. It frees them up, you know, because they are constricted. They have time barriers, time constraints, and so they're not planning. I mean, they eventually start planning, but they're not planning for date two, I guess, and there's a freedom in that, but it's all because of the time constriction.

Speaker 2

Yeah.

Speaker 12

I mean that is the theme of link Latter's career. Time and memory, and I think memory is a part of this film as well.

Speaker 2

You know.

Speaker 12

But if you think about link Latter's career, the film he did before this was another Dusk till Dawn movie was Days and Confused, sort of based around his own memories of high school. This happened to him as well some version of this story. Your Boyhood is obviously an extension of time which we're following people in both a real way and Almoso documentary way as well, because these are real the actors are real people who are who

are growing throughout this amount of time. And of course all these three films together also interesting to think about in terms of time. If you think about the amount of time that Justin and Seleen spend together, you know, it's just very little between this between the time they spend here, which is certainly less than twenty four hours, and then and then the little bit of time they get in before a sunset, which is kind of done

in real time. The amount of actual time they spend together is very very small, which might also explain how much they're fighting and before midnight when they get to know each other.

Speaker 2

But and then of course with the memory part, I.

Speaker 12

Mean you get at the end of this movie, this beautiful montage of all the spaces that they've visited and recontextualized by their relationship. All of these spaces now have a meeting imposed upon them and imposed upon us due to their presence in them, and those spaces are going to be remember, are going to be burned in their memories and hopefully, I guess if we appreciate the movie burned in ours.

Speaker 7

I think that connects with your the opening thing you mentioned Adam about you know, the camera phones and the technology. It's when they say when he says I'm going to take a picture, you know, and then doesn't, but he stands there we're getting Those are the pictures they might have taken of those spots, Scott when we get back to it.

Speaker 3

So yeah, I like that that connects with.

Speaker 12

This you know selfie sticks at that time, which was.

Speaker 1

Well, not only that, but you realize there are the moments when the conversation dies. That's where I was like, I wanted to throw my phone into the equivalent of the Danube because it's like we fill those moments. Those are the moments we'd reach for our phone or be like check my texts or check my email. They have to sit in those moments of discomfort. The conversation has has kind of gone into a little bit of a

lull and they have to reignite it. It's a nice bridge, and it's yeah, and it's like we don't we yeah, put it, you know.

Speaker 2

It's like, I like this bridge.

Speaker 1

Exactly, we even see that exactly. I got nothing, but I realized there needs to be something here.

Speaker 3

How about the bridge.

Speaker 1

Identifying with those moments in a different way. It's like, we don't, we don't do that anymore, And it made me long for those moments.

Speaker 12

Yeah, there's a really significant small thing that happens in the movie, at least something that I caught when watching it, is when the palm reader comes over and says something to Selene about how she believes in the power of the moment.

Speaker 2

And I think that's really a critical.

Speaker 12

Thing about a film like this, or film like Days to Confused, where it's just in its memory based of just like these really critical moments out of time that just stay with you and are so important, and that these two people believe in so sincerely that they're able, that they're willing to jump off this train, to get off this train together and do something impulsive because they want they believe in the power of the moment, and they're willing to pursue this moment is as passionately as

they can without regard to the consequences, without having caution about what, you know, the reality that there is an endpoint to all of this, where where she's going to get back on train, He's going to take the plane back to America, and this this is going to end.

Speaker 2

They disregard that thought.

Speaker 5

I'm glad that you mentioned memory in addition to time, because I guess enough time had passed since I last seen this film. I had forgotten about the coda at the end the post. I kind of thought it ended there at the train station, and the fact that we get link later just kind of reminding us of the

different spots that they hit. But then we also get cuts back to each of them reflecting, and you can't imagine in that moment that that's what they're doing, is they're replaying the night, that's their vision, reimagining, you know, what they experienced together. So I forgot to do this earlier. You can trust Ethan Hawk is going to have an original idea. We kept overlapping on our favorite scenes, but

I did have a chance. Still my favorite interview ever, and it was because of Ethan Hawk one hundred percent what he gave to the interview. Best conversation I've had on the show a few years back. That's not with Josh, Yeah exactly. Okay, well said, if then can win, that's fine. And at the end of the conversation, we were out of time, and I was going to go through with him these scenes and these moments and just get him to talk about them, but we were out of time.

As you'll hear, he still decided to share with us what his favorite moment is in the film. So I think Ali's going to help us out and play it. There's so much more we could get to. We did our top five wink Later scenes a while back, I think when Everybody Wants Some came out and I just looking at Nist again, realized that four of my five scenes had you in it. Go and maybe you're Maybe another time we'll be able to go through those.

Speaker 1

Yeah, I have to do my favorite that I've ever been.

Speaker 6

He is talking Julie to get off the train before summer. Oh yeah, you know, I'm telling her that she was going to be a time traveler, and I was going to make her feel better about her present marriage by revealing to her how what a loser I want.

Speaker 1

He was a loser. That's the thing. Isn't that the big secret in this movie? He almost blows it like a half a dozen times at least.

Speaker 5

Yeah, I mean he's still He's still Ethan Hawk, And I'm going to say that that two film run with reality bites in this maybe the most gorgeous man ever on screen. So at least that's you know, my predilections.

But you know, I like that that as well because it brings up the time travel aspect of it and saying you're right that maybe every twenty minutes time is explicitly referenced, but every single conversation is either them thinking about the future, even imagining a future that they may have together, even though I don't think either of them in that moment actually believe that, or they're reflecting on their past, right.

Speaker 7

I do think the deflation of Jesse is key to this movie though. It's really why it works. But it's not, you know, making him into a joke at all. It's allowing him to be a truer sense of himself it's allowing him to be more than that guy who is telling that time travel story, which is a great one, but it's a bit of a performance, right, And so he needs someone like her who's willing to prod and poke at that affectionately so that he can become more genuine.

Speaker 3

And then she needs him.

Speaker 7

She needs a sparring partner. She needs someone to, like, you know, provide her with some ideas she can push back against. And he's definitely do that and doing that, and in a way they become this couple that is self giving. I think Jesse says a couple of times when he talks about love, who are giving each other something else that they need. It might just be for these eighteen hours or whatever. But Delpy reminded me watching it today of another great nineties woman character, actually Elaine

in Seinfeld. I was getting so many Julia Louis Dreyfus, because especially that one line where she goes he says, what.

Speaker 3

Bothers you, and shees, I hate everything. It's just like and then you can see her going off.

Speaker 7

I was picturing how there's this same sort of like going to take the world on and not worry about the consequences, and he provides her that space to do it for these couple of hours.

Speaker 1

Well, I love too that link Later and his writing partner clearly had learned a few things, but they were still able to write for who these characters were at that time, which were two people that had a lot of ideas and no experience. They were full of shit basically, you know when when kind of us when we start exactly, but when Hawk says something like what is love? But two selfish people just don't want to be lonely, I'm like, Nope,

not actually at all. You're totally wrong, And that's that's okay, Like he's twenty two, twenty three, and that those characters feel authentic in what they don't know and have only thought about. Yeah, it's just movies so special.

Speaker 5

Well that's actually a perfect note to go out on. But I'll open it up to the panel here because we do have to Unfortunately, like we ran out of time with Ethan Hawk, we're out of time here to talk about Ethan Hawk in this film. Any closing thoughts, anything else you want to impart to the crowd.

Speaker 2

M hmm, well I want to. I want to let me impart this this.

Speaker 12

It's not even related to Before Sunrise because this is the end of your this is your yeah film Festival.

Speaker 2

At film Festival, when.

Speaker 12

We talk about film discourse, usually the word discourse we put in scare quotes and I and I think that as a critic, the best thing that you can do is to inspire curiosity, passion, thought, conversation, deepen the experience for people. And I think that is something that Film Spotting has done throughout its twenty years and continues to do and has cultivated this extraordinary crowd. And so I just wanted to tip my hat to film Spotting at twenty.

Speaker 5

Thank you very much, Thanks Scott, Thank you. From March. That was our post screening Film spotting Fest conversation about Before Sunrise with Scott Tobias and producer Sam recorded live at Chicago's Music Box Theater. If you'd like to take a look back and learn a little bit about Film Spotting Fest, you can go to filmspotting dot net slash film Spotting dash Fest. One more piece of business. These revisits of the first two before movies. This really is

a jam pack show, Josh. Those revisits were part of our Pantheon project for titles in the Pantheon that have never received a proper review, we're giving them their due, and this is going to be ongoing, tying them in with different anniversaries over the next few years. Before Sunrise, Before Sunset safe to say still Pantheon worthy.

Speaker 3

Josh Absolutely, yep. Okay.

Speaker 5

The third film in the trilogy, twenty thirteen's Before Midnight, is also in the Pantheon. It was a package deal that did get a review on the show way back on episode four forty nine, so we can consider its ticket to the Pantheon already punched. And the answer is, we are going to consider it's ticket punch but we're also going to take another look at it in twenty twenty eight. Why not for its fifteenth anniversary.

Speaker 3

Yeah.

Speaker 7

Yeah, As I think I mentioned when we were talking Before Sunset is, I can only imagine my appreciation will rise for it and as it did for Sunset on a revisit. So it would be fun to do that.

Speaker 5

But we felt like we'd be remiss if we didn't use this occasion all this Pantheon talk to induct one more film. We're doing a special exemption. We're not going to induct anymore Pantheon films until next year when it's time. We've decided that we're not going to willy nilly in duck movies into the Pantheon. There will be a time every year, the same month when we'll do it. There's a process now, Josh. But there's a special exemption and this movie is worthy and we're going to give you

its bona fides. That movie is Paul Thomas Anderson's There Will Be Blood.

Speaker 7

Why you may recognize it as the champion of film spotting madness just a few weeks ago, the best films of this century so far. Yeah, There Will Be Blood came out on top. And what other madness did it win?

Speaker 3

Adam? Didn't it win a previous tournament.

Speaker 5

Back in twenty nineteen. It won the best of the two thousands, So that makes sense, right. If it's going to be the best film of the last twenty five years, probably should be the best film of the first ten years of this quarter century. It also made my list of the top twenty five Films of the century list. I think it narrowly yours, fair to say, John.

Speaker 7

Yeah, definitely a consideration, and I think it's taken. I don't know how many film spotting polls over the years on various subjects, whenever it came up, whether that's favorite Paul Thomas Anderson film or you know, having listeners also vote in these sorts of rankings of the decades. So this is a movie that is routinely revered on the show and would be the obvious pick if we needed a Paul Thomas Anderson film in the Pantheon. I think

would be an obvious consensus pick. And yes, I will say that again, we do not have a Paul Thomas Anderson's problem in the pantheon, which is a travesty of its own that we are going to be correcting now.

Speaker 5

And yet as obvious as it is, and as obvious as it is to have a PTA movie in it, I know you'd lobby for Phantom Thread, I could lobby for The Master, and I'd even potentially lobby for Boogie Nights. So it's a tough choice. But with those credentials it has to be. There will be blood. It is going into the pantheon.

Speaker 10

Ry, what is this your farewell speech going home, your farewell to the troops.

Speaker 3

I'm not going on going with friends, have a good trick.

Speaker 5

More about The film Spotting Pantheon is available at Filmspotting dot Net slash Pantheon.

Speaker 9

This episode is brought to you by Peloton. Break through the busiest time of year with the brand new Peloton Cross Training tread Plus powered by Peloton Iq. With real time guidance and endless ways to move, you can personalize your workouts and train with confidence, helping you reach your goals in less time. Let yourself run, lift, sculpt, push and go. Explore the new Peloton Cross Training tread Plus at one Peloton dot com.

Speaker 8

Hey, it's Brooklyn Adams and I'm partnering with Abercommy to tell you about the newest drop from their Active brand, Personal Best. Yp b luggings are made with buttery soft fabrics that hug you in all the right places and common Abercomi's viral Curve love fit designed to eliminate waste gap, Paired with sports bras and super soft sweatshirts. It's active word that supports every part of my busy lifestyle and gives me my best but ever. Head into the new

year feeling your personal best. Shop Active by Abercrombie in the app, online and in stores.

Speaker 1

Helora, Sure to.

Speaker 2

Hell Bizierier.

Speaker 7

That's for Andre Tarkowski's Nostalgia from nineteen eighty three. It is the final film in our Tarkowski Marathon and the final Tarkowski film, Adam, you needed to see to become a completist. We each had different blind spots as part of this marathon, and this was a big one for you and now you have seen it the film spotty marathons. We do these about once or twice a year. There are opportunities to do just that fill in cinematic blind spots.

Speaker 3

Now.

Speaker 7

Nostalgia follows chronologically the film we talked about last week, nineteen seventy nine's Stalker. Unlike Stalker, not any metaphysical sci fi going on. Instead, this is about a Russian writer who is traveling to Italy with a translator to conduct research for a project about an eighteenth century Russian composer

who spent some time in this area of Italy. Nostalgia premiered in competition at the nineteen eighty three can Film Festival, where Tarkowski shared the Best Director prize with another cinematic heavyweight, Robert Broussan, for what ended up being Brosson's final film, larjen.

Speaker 5

If letterbox can be trusted. Josh, it looks like you last saw Nostalgia about ten years ago October twenty fifth. Was that in advance of our Top five can Best Director winners Top five in November twenty fifteen or maybe another occasion At the time you wrote it would take many viewings to get a more specific handle on Tarkovsky's thematic aims. I think you could write that about every Tarkovski film, and you could write this as well. Yet I was more than content to simply swim in the

movies mysteries and possibilities. Swim an apt word considering all the water imagery. It's not many viewings later, It's just one at this point. So how was your handle on Tarkovsky this time?

Speaker 7

Getting there with this one? You know, in those times talking about Stoker, when I referenced other denser works of Tarkovsky, I think I was maybe thinking most about nostalgia. Perhaps the sacrifice can be a little bit that way. I think this viewing has helped me understand a little better what I sawce Off in that first view, and it's the theme of motherhood. We can maybe spend some time talking about that. I still have questions about that theme.

But let's jump back to start, at least by jumping back to our conversation about Stalker, because with that fresh in my mind and that being my most recent viewing, I notice that nostalgia in a way has a version

of the room that is in Stoker. I don't think this is the dominant theme, but it is interesting that it's there, and it's actually there at the start, when we do see the interpreter played by Domesiana Giordano going into this chapel, it looks like some sort of chapel and she's observing what's going on and the sacristan working there. I think she asked him what's supposed to happen here, and he says, whatever you like, whatever you need most, and right there I was like, oh wow, we're discussing

the room. And then he says, how about this, but you should at least kneel down, which connects to the idea I pulled out about the room being where you encounter the divine. I like how he also says that earlier on there he says if there are casual lookers meaning her at the chapel, nothing happens, so it's kind of like how serious what is the faith of the professor and the writer in Stalker? And then there's that bizarre visit that the poet, this main character makes to

this abandoned abbey, San Gugano. And as he's wandering around this edifice with no roof, nothing in the windows, grass growing on the ground, but it has this, you know, the structure of an abbey. We hear a man and a woman talking about the man seeking God, but God not responding, and so you know, these are all through lines to what I think is the main concern of Stalker and a side concern here, but definitely because we watched discuss Stoker, I feel like I was able to

draw that out a little bit more. So That's where I was at with this second viewing. But yeah, for your first viewing, was there something that stood out to you as a prominence or preeminent concern of all the things Tartskovsky is dipping his toes in with this film.

Speaker 5

Well, before I try to answer that I mentioned earlier, the coincidence spotting of watching this film after watching and also talking about before sunset and sunrise on this show, it is not just the nostalgia thing. What did it for me. Josh was at some point seeing a close up of Domisiana Giordano Eugenia as you mentioned, and seeing

that strawberry blonde hair, the curly long lock. She's doing something with her hair, and it was like I was looking at Julie Delpy from before, from before Sunset and Sunrise, and they're having these philosophical conversations. Is they're kind of sitting and strolling around, and he's a writer, like Jesse's a writer. And I was just flashing back to Sunset and Sunrise as I was watching this movie, even being in a foreign country for the writer in this case as well. So that was in my mind as I

was watching this film. But what was really in my mind watching it as the culmination of this marathon was how perfect it was. Whether or not it's the last film from Tarkovski, it's not, We have the Sacrifice. It is a perfect closing film to this marathon, because the opening of this movie is a kind of Tarkovski one oh one. We have this shot where you've got this

misty haze fog sweeping across. You've used this word, I think I've used it before, maybe back when we talked about mirror, like something's been conjured, that is that is sweeping across the landscape. We have a pond, so we've got the water, got to have that. We have a dog, and we have a white horse. They're all there, All

our main characters are here. We also have actual people, and they're doing that thing that Tarkovsky characters often do and do a lot in this film, which is looking back at the camera, looking at us, often kind of breaking the fourth wall, and it gives us that sense of the point of view of a dreamer, the point of view of someone who is having a memory. And it even ends with a freeze frame. And this is something Tarkovsky has done in other films, and he's done

in other films in this marathon. Now, I can't completely rely on my notes here, but I know that in other films I have written down, Wait a second, is that a subtle? Is that a freeze frame there? And I went back to my notes for Stalker and I swear to God and my notes for Stoker I have does it freeze frame on them?

Speaker 3

Just before the rain?

Speaker 5

And then I went back to Andre Rubelev and Josh I would not have copied and pasted this for any reason, It says, does it freeze frame on them just before the rain? So is it possible that exactly the same moment, there's a freeze frame before rain starts to fall in those two films, and here again he uses a freeze frame.

So it's all of these Tarkovsky images and ideas kind of co mingling just at the beginning of the film, and it's it's haunting and it's beautiful, and I felt like I was right in the headspace I needed to be in at the beginning of this film. The other thing that I guess I'm going to keep harping on because he is going to keep harping on it the character of the Holy Fool that this movie is largely built around. We meet Domenico, and here we get a

great definition of it. I think if you're going to ask ultimately what Tarkovsky means by the Holy Fool, we have the main character Andre Gorchakov. We have his definition what he says to Eugenia, says, they're troublesome, inconvenient, they're alone, but they're certainly closer to the truth. I think that goes for Andre Rublev, that goes for the main character in Stalker. It goes for other characters that we've seen throughout this entire marathon. And isn't that ultimately, by the

end of this film, we're gonna jump ahead. We have to get to the end of this film. By the end of this movie, isn't that ultimately what we see Gortchakov become. Now what happens to our actual holy fool, the character who starts as our holy fool, Well, that's that's a pretty awful demise. Yeah, And the way Tarkovsky depicts it is horrific. In the sound design, he cuts out the music Beethoven at one point to give us the screams we hear, the screams of pain as he

has self immolated. And yet Tarkovsky finds a way to go from some thing terrible, something brutal, to something kind of beautiful, the flames that have engulfed him to the flame of the candle, almost a match cut the flame of the candle that Andrea is holding as he is now going to try to do what Domenico asked him to do, which is show his faith walk across the

water with this candle. And at first I thought, I thought, is this another case of Tarkowski asking us as an audience to have a certain amount of faith ourselves, because it seems like he's walking across the water pretty easily, but we don't see his legs and we don't really see a wide shot, and so is he doing it

or is he not doing it? And then you realize, well, okay, it's all dried up and so there's really no water there, and so it's a little bit of an easy way out, but it's not so much of an easy way out because he still has to walk across and keep that flame intact. And I don't know how long that sequence is, but it feels like I didn't have time to go back in time. It Josh, that's a long sequence. Okay,

seven minutes. It feels like an unbroken take has to be an unbroken take, right, we have to we have to experience that entire journey. That has to feel like his entire lifespan shrunken down to seven minutes. And it does. Yeah, And as he walks across, he ultimately gets across, and I think in that moment does finally prove that he believes, proves his faith. And for me, that felt like that ending felt to me as close to the pinnacle or the ideal of a Tarkovsky ending as you could possibly have.

Speaker 7

It's an astonishing sequence that is comprised of, yes, little more than this man trudging across the length of a drained natural pool with a candle, hoping it won't go out because of the wind coming through or whatever. Yeah, this would have been my scene of the year if it came out in nineteen eighty three. It's just one of these sustained but quiet instances of slow cinema being mesmerized by that and you get lost in the effort. You get Time takes on a different meaning if you

allow yourself to give into it. Is it him expressing his faith? I can see that I'm still uncertain of what's going on in that scene, even though I submit to its power. I think that I think that would make sense. This is something the Holy fool has asked him to do. It is something that he didn't do. I forget if he tells him at one point that

he did it before he's done it. I suggests that he suggests that he's done and he has it, So it is he's he's circling back to follow through on something he promised, which is interesting, and yeah, what is maybe this is him entering the room to bring it back to Stalker is by doing this, he's taking that step that the writer and the professor wouldn't take. So that coincides with what you're talking about in terms of

an expression of faith. So yeah, I like that, but it is also his last I read it as his last gesture on earth because I too, and.

Speaker 5

That supports my theory to me. Yeah, he makes it that expression, that ultimate expression of faith.

Speaker 7

It also transports him to because it's not literally the final scene. What we then get is that like it is a freeze frame shot, I think, but the camera is still pulling back again. One of these definitive Tarkowsky images that you know, if you just google his name, it's one of the images that will come credible of

the poet. This is we're in black and white. Now, we haven't really talked about the shifts too much of color and black and white, but we're in black and white, which has been suggested to be his visions or dreams or memories, and the shack we've seen in these visions and dreams and memories is there yet it is somehow inside this abandoned abby I've described which quick note and speaking of you know as it came up earlier in the show Debi iron Off on a thirtieth anniversary trip.

Tenth anniversary trip was to Italy and we went to this abbey, son Gealganok Abbey. Yeah, it is one of the most unsettling places I've been on Earth, in the sense that you don't know what it's supposed to be because it is completely It has this edifice. It is an abbey, but it looks like a cathedral. It wasn't a cathedral. It was, you know, a place where monks worshiped and lived, but it has the edifice of a massive cathedral, and yet nature has taken over inside and

there's no roof. And it's just so perfect that a place like that would show up in a Tarkaff movie because it exists here on Earth, but it seems like it'd be one of these art installations he would create for one of his movies at any rate. At this shot, we have the poet sitting in the middle of this abbey. Miniature work had to be involved to get this, to pull this off, and he's sitting there with the dog

again looking at the camera. Snow begins to fall. So here's the question, as you described the earlier image like that, if he's been the viewer previously in these visions, when characters look back, we assume they're looking back at him, even though they're looking at us. Now he is looking at us.

Speaker 3

Is that you know?

Speaker 7

I think we talked about this in Stalker? Is that the point where Tarkowsky is now challenging us? What are you going to do with this presence that's been presented to you? What is your response going to be? Is that what the poet is saying to us as the only viewers left? But also where is he now? Is he in his memories? Is he in his visions? Because we both read it as that he has died in

that pool. Yes, so thematically, there's so many possibilities. It's just as a composition of its own, it's a master work.

Speaker 5

Well yeah, just purely as a composition. You're exactly right. But I'm reading it as he is transcending whatever plane of existence he's on when he's in the pool, he is into another realm, whatever you want to characterize that realm as, whatever name you want to put on it. I do associate it, I suppose, with a sort of heaven in the sense that it it seems to be based on how we can find parallels with the other imagery and with the dog there in the water and

the home. It feels like it's his childhood home. It feels like it's that nostalgic, warm place.

Speaker 2

Now.

Speaker 5

I don't know what to do with the abbey and what it's wrapped in, I really I don't fully, but it feels like it feels like it is comforting to him in that moment. Yeah, and so that's why I read that whole ending as as a positive thing from a faith perspective.

Speaker 7

And you have to also read these visions as memories of his childhood, right, because you know, I don't. I was wondering is this his wife that he's seen or is this his mother?

Speaker 3

And of course that's a tricky could be both in different points.

Speaker 7

Yeah, in mirror there's a figure where it's the same actress plays the main figures ex wife and mother. So yeah, so that's hard to say, but I think I lean with you as these are memories of childhood, right, and a childhood home. And yeah, another thing I was going to point out, is you were in one of these visions the use of camera work. Here we have these women figures, I think there's three of them, that they're looking at the camera and the camera is kind of

tracking sideways across their faces. And this is a trick Tarkovsky has pulled in other films too, where an actor will look at the camera and then the camera slides past them to meet another actor. They must run behind the camera to position themselves in the scene. Further, so, as the camera continues to track, they reappear. And it seems that this goes back to the conjuring and the breaking of temporal space. We're like, wait a minute, how did they were just to my left? He does it

with andre in Domenico's Dwelling too. Yes, yeah, it's such a suttle effective trick. And then in that same shot it comes to a still point and the horses in there and the dog is in there. I could have sworn to your question about the freeze frame. Somehow they managed to freeze frame the horse. So we see that the women either wind is blowing their hair or they move a little bit. The dog moves its position. But if you Notice the horse in the background has completely frozen.

Why how Who knows? But the immediate fact is like we're in a time and space that you've never been in before.

Speaker 5

Yeah, this entire film feels that way. You said that as you were setting this up, right, And there are no traditional sci fi elements. This isn't a science fiction film. It definitely is not, and certainly not in the way Stalker is or Solaris is. And yet you are in all of these liminal spaces. The entire film is a liminal space. At one point. To go back to what you said too about time and space breaking down. Remember he thinks it's time for lunch, and she says at

seven am. We have no sense we as viewers, the characters have no sense of what time it is. And yes I had in my notes. The camera pans left, and all of a sudden you're in a different place. The characters are in different places within the room, the fog coming in the way when the camera moves. You have characters who are in that water in the canal, and they're perfectly still. It feels like an alien landscape almost.

You have missed oozing up from the ground, right, So there is something that feels alien about it, and you have to almost wonder, like in Stalker, what kind of world are we in? Is this the world of the mind? Is it an imaginary place? Is it some kind of dystopia? Honestly?

Speaker 8

Is it?

Speaker 5

Who knows? It doesn't feel like the real world, even though there are aspects of it that feel very much like our everyday world. But all of the characters are fluctuating within it and within this time in space, which is why when Tarkovsky breaks it in various ways and shocks us, it's so striking. One of those moments is when Eugenia goes into the church and that I don't know what you exactly call it, not a statue, but Mother Mary is before her.

Speaker 7

Yeah, they call it the Madonna of childbirth. I think childbirth.

Speaker 5

And when when that woman kneels down in front of her and the gown opens and those birds fly incredible, right, I mean, it's it's a it's a stunner. And as if that wasn't stunning enough, the next shot is the feathers from the birds cascading down, floating down on top of the candles. That that is also gorgeous, And then we.

Speaker 7

Get like that could happen, but it's tiptoeing towards things where you're like.

Speaker 3

How could that ever happen? Right?

Speaker 2

Right?

Speaker 5

So yeah, I guess if you want to use these words, it's secular and spiritual colliding, which that collision seems to happen all of the time in these films. And then we get to the hotel, and I know, especially coming off of Stalker, this is kind of almost silly to say, but what filmmaker, and I'm gonna say even even better than Kubrick, what filmmaker uses rooms and uses doorways better?

Speaker 2

Yeah?

Speaker 5

Ute uses doorways like their portals to other worlds all the time. They're constantly these imposing forces behind almost almost imposing forces behind characters. As they're talking, we feel the presence behind them, like they're they're drawing them in. Or what about that shot? I think it's when he's going into Domenico's home for the first time and he parts the doors. They're like barn doors that he parts, and when he does, what's on the other side black and white.

He's going into a dream, He's going into a memory when he opens that door. That's that reality and fantasy or memory world. Directly, they're colliding with each other. But then when we go into the hotel, that room, that room that he is in, Josh with that bed in the middle and the light on the window and the

bathroom on each side of it. Here again, I'm gonna say nothing sci fi about it directly, and yet it almost feels like something out of two thousand and one, the way the bathroom is bathed in that white sterile light, and the way the rain is coming in through the window, and then of course talk about memory, world and reality clashing with each other. All sorts of weird stuff starts to happen over the course of that long shot.

Speaker 7

I think that shot, you know, if you wanted to give a shot to maybe explain Tarkowski, you might choose that, even though it's not quite as rivera as the final one. It's this art installation idea where he places the camera and lets the production design and the lighting. That light you described in the bathroom shifts a little bit, and I noticed this time the window to the left of

the bed. It's raining outside, as you said, and the way it's raining on the wall beyond of the building beyond it kind of makes the paint of that building peel off and fall down.

Speaker 3

So it's it's almost this, you know.

Speaker 7

Esoteric art piece. You're just watching shapes and colors change. And then the water is not only coming through the window, but it's seeping through the floor in a way. All of a sudden, there's a puddle by the bed, and then this is probably where you were going.

Speaker 3

But suddenly the dog who comes out of the shows yeah.

Speaker 7

And just it's the same dog from the black and white visions and calmly walks to the side of the bed and lays down. And I love how the poet. I think this is the touch that connects it to a temporal space, because initially we might be thinking, well, that's maybe another dog, what's going on? We're trying to stay in the real world. He just gently reaches out his hand and strokes the dog. So it's even though it shouldn't be there, he should be concerned about this.

That links the dog not only because the same kind of dog, but to his memories. Because of his response to it. It's like he's drifting off now into this dream or this vision, and the dog has we've talked about the dog in stock or the dog has led him there, or the dog represents in this case. In that case, you talked about how the dog represents this

really happened because he came out of the zone. Here, the dog is like, well, something metaphysical is really happening, because I came out of the metaphysical into the real world.

Speaker 5

The dog almost brings him back into the scene, because the way it's lit, it feels like Andrea is sinking into the bed, into the darkness. He's disappearing, and you feel like he might actually be disappearing, like some kind of magic act is happening as we're watching it. A couple of their small touches that I noticed throughout the marathon.

We've referenced a few times, the birches. I think we both probably assumed that for them to be a recurring motif, that there had to be something in his childhood that he was fond of, and he liked to include that image. And we have a line here where a character says the birches. He loves the birches and the air of my childhood, so we must have grown up around them. There's a lot of autobiographical elements in all of his films,

but here, like mirror. He even references the poet his father, Tarkovsky, so we have that. I think she's reading his poems, right, I believe I think Eugenia is reading Tarkovsky. I think we can take him at his word here this character, even though it is a character, that those birches are something from his childhood, and this is maybe even I was gonna say, maybe it's unintentional, but I don't think

it is. It's just too good. I love when Domenico says to Andre when they're talking, Andre takes out a cigarette and Domenico says something like, I also smoke when I don't know what to say. And you realize how often, even in movies, that's exactly what a cigarette is, right. A cigarette is such a perfect diversion. It allows you to buy time. That's how they function. When you don't know what to do, you don't know what to say, you can at least stall and light up a cigarette.

And later after Eugenia has said on the phone to him, you know, I have a boyfriend. Now I have my man, Vittorio. We're gonna do this, We're gonna do that. There's a pretty good sense that that isn't that happy of a relationship anyway, just based on how that scene is shot and how cold it detached he seems. But what happens at the very end of that scene. The camera is fixated on her, but we know she's talking to him, and there's no sound, there's nothing coming from him whatsoever.

He doesn't seem to really even notice her. And what does she say. She says, I'm gonna go out and buy some cigarettes, And it felt to me like a direct callback to that scene where it's her saying, clearly, we have nothing to say to each other and all she can think to do is God and get some cigarettes.

Speaker 7

Yeah, she's really good throughout. She kind of fades away from the film a little bit in the middle section. But I think I'm not sure if we've mentioned Oleg Yankovski as Andre, This main character a really a hard part, I would think, to pull off where you're not responding much, so much of this is taking place in his head.

Yet he you know, he's compelling enough on his own as this figure to hold our attention, our interests, and our sympathy, and especially he's able to pull off that long take at the end where it has to be all about his physicality and his perseverance. Right, he doesn't say anything there. And then Dominico, who you were describing the holy fool here Eerlyn Josephson, who would later start

in Tarkovski's The Sacrifice. Yeah, playing this somewhat wild character, but I also love you know, he's notorious, this character Dominico for having locked his family up years before. I think was it seven years today?

Speaker 5

Seven years?

Speaker 7

Yeah, seven years because it's unclear he thought it was the end of the world or was he just jealous because some man was looking at his wife and he didn't want her to be around men. But he locks his entire family up. We get a black and white flashback to when the family escapes the home, and that I think ties us more closely to Dominico as a sympathetic character and not just this raving lunatic so and

Josephsin's performance, of course helps with that. And as you were mentioning the autobiographical stuff, just thought probably worth noting. And this is tied to the theme of motherhood we've touched on here and there. Clearly the Madonna of Childbirth statue sequence at the beginning is tied to that. But at the end of this film dedicated to the memory

of my mother. So you know, clearly a primary concern of nostalgia is not only this general notion of motherhood, but specifically Tarkovsky's mother as well.

Speaker 5

Nostalgia is currently available vod My Tarkovsky rank list should be coming in hot on letterbox. Do you already have yours?

Speaker 3

There?

Speaker 1

Yeah?

Speaker 7

No, because I got to give some time with you know, having these it's tougher than it was before, and not just because now I've seen every film.

Speaker 5

We will have one more bit of Tarkovsky business to attend to when you get back from your trip. We have to share, as we conclude every marathon, we have to share our Tarkovsky Awards. We need a name. I'm gonna throw out the Birches.

Speaker 2

But.

Speaker 7

Yeah, it's I feel like that's kind of got to be the Holy Fool.

Speaker 5

It may have to be the Holy Fools, but you know what, We'll still take other suggestions, and if we eat our special category, it seems obvious to go with something like just even the single shot best image.

Speaker 3

Yeah, that might be.

Speaker 7

That might be a good one to kind of force us to really narrow in. I mean, we've talked about water so much. It could be water image if we wanted to at least give ourselves some constraints, but a couple places we could go.

Speaker 5

Email us feedback at filmspotting dot net with your suggestions and if you would like to learn more about this marathon or past marathons. I think this is our fifty first. You can visit filmspotting dot net slash marathons, Josh, that is our show.

Speaker 7

If you want to connect with us on social media, you can find Adam and the show at Instagram and Facebook and letterboxed. He's at film spotting. I'm at those places as well as Larsen on film We are independently produced.

Speaker 3

And listener support it.

Speaker 7

You can support the show by joining the film Spotting Family at film spottingfamily dot com. That way you can listen early. You can also listen ad free. Sam puts out a weekly newsletter. We record monthly bonus episodes, and you can get access to the entire show archive. If you're interested in show t shirts or any other merch you could go to film spotting dot net slash.

Speaker 5

Shop in that Film Spotting archive lots so link later. Last year's hit Man nine to seventy, Apollo ten and a half, eight sixty seven, Where'd You Go? Bernadette seven forty one, Everybody Wants Some five eighty one. Boyhood. That was a film Spotting Fix episode dedicated just to Boyhood Before Midnight four forty nine, Bernie three ninety nine and

more outstreaming this weekend. Fear Street prom Queen. The It girls are fighting to win prom Queen, but when someone new enters the race, others start to disappear without a trace. Susannah Soon from Red Rocket, Arianna Greenblatt from Barbie, Lily Taylor, and Katherine Waterston star also Fountain of Youth, treasure hunter John Krasinski and a strange sister, Natalie Portman, assemble a team for an adventure in search of the object the location of the title. We'll have to see or not, Josh,

it's directed by Guy Ritchie on Apple TV plus. You can to fit that in before heading off to Japan.

Speaker 7

I mean sort of sounds like a plane movie, but I I don't know how the logistics of that work.

Speaker 5

I like Sam's note here, does this movie actually exist? Impossible to exactly now. I know you're curious about this one. Pee Wee as Himself, a two part documentary about Paul pee Wee Herman Rubens. That's on Max Yeah, very interesting Limited. You can see Jane Austen Wrecked My Life. An aspiring author finds herself in some austin Esque romantic entanglements at a writer's retreat. To be weird if they were Dostaievsky esque. Aaron Newarth, our friend says, a charming French romantic comedy

out wide. Leelo and Stitch, the live action edition directed by Dean Fleischer Camp, who directed Marcel the Shell with Shoes on Mission Impossible. The Final Reckoning is the big Dog. Though out this weekend, Tom Cruise has reckoned for the last time, or so we are led to believe. Next week, Michael Phillips is here. Am I The Final Reckoning and our top five movie stunts.

Speaker 7

Film Spotting is produced by Golden Joe Desso and Say I'm Van Haggren without saying m and Golden Joe, this show would it go? Our production assistant is Sophie Kempinar Special thanks to everyone at wbeazy Chicago. More information is available at wbeazy dot org. For Film Spotty nine, Josh Larson and I'm Adam Kempinar.

Speaker 5

Thanks for listening.

Speaker 8

This conversation can serve no purpose anymore.

Speaker 11

Good fine, Well, the holidays have come and gone once again. But if you've forgotten to get that special someone in your life a gift, Well, midmobile is extending their holiday offer of half off unlimited wireless.

Speaker 5

So here's the idea.

Speaker 1

You get it now.

Speaker 5

You call it an early present for next year?

Speaker 1

What do you have to lose? Give it a try at midmobile dot com.

Speaker 13

Slash Switch limited time fifty percent off regular price for new customers up from payment required forty five dollars for three month ninety dollars or six months one hundred and eighty dollars for twelve month plan. Taxism Bees Extra office Bees may slow after fifty gigabytes for month when network is busy. See terms

Speaker 8

Panably

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android