The Feudal Future Podcast .
Hello and welcome to another episode of the Feudal Future Podcast . I'm Marshall Toplansky , I'm Joel Kotkin and today we are going to be dissecting the British elections that just happened , and to help us do that is Tom Slater , who is editor of Spiked Tom . Welcome , thanks for having me .
Well , this was just one of the craziest election cycles around the world , I think , including , by the way , not you know , looking at the United States is not necessarily the exemplar of the world . But let's get into it . Joel , do you want to start us off ?
Yeah , I mean this is one of the things that we talk about . A lot is unintended consequences , and certainly we have , in both Britain and now in France , what might be the unintended consequence of what appears to be a resurgence of the left . Is that overstated or is there some reality to that ?
Well , I think just in the British example , on paper the election that we've just had looks like a tremendous vindication of the Labour Party , our centre-left party , I mean it got closest to the 1997 new Labour landslide in scale . It was only really a few seats short of that . The Conservatives reduced down to 121 seats .
That's their worst ever results by any serious metric . But it was a really weird election insofar as in the end the Labour Party only got around 34% of the vote , which is the lowest percentage which any majority party has got in the post-war era . Really odd kind of election we've had .
Turnout was down to 60% , which is , I think , the second lowest turnout figure that we've had in a general election on record . And so you put those two numbers together and you basically had Labour getting this incredible 170-something seat majority , but on the basis of about 20% of the voting public actually voting .
So really the story of this election is very much the collapse of this election is very much the collapse of the Conservative Party .
It's bleeding of support to this insurgent right , populist party called Reform to its right , and it's very much the kind of the collapse of the post-Brexit Conservatives really than it is Labour which kind of just won by default really , in this election , well , and given the fact that it's the centre-left that now has won , what is it you think voters are saying ?
Why did they change course ?
I think more than anything it was a rejection of the Conservatives . On the one hand there's obviously a big kind of anti-Tory voting bloc in the UK . It's gone particularly vociferous in the wake of Brexit .
Particularly , I think kind of professional , managerial class type voters , public sector workers and whatever have got increasingly enraged with the Tory government for kind of obvious reasons .
Kind of coalition that was carved out in the previous election in the wake of Brexit , which was this new alliance between the kind of Conservatives' more traditional support base and this new support that they carved out in the Midlands , in the North , amongst working class voters , constituencies which had voted Labour for as long as there was a Labour party .
That coalition broke down so you had large sections of the kind of Northern working class vote go to this reform party . A lot of them also just go back to not voting and some of them going back into the Labour column . But really again the story is of is of Tory collapse rather than the public deciding .
You know what we're desperate to return to sort of technocratic , technocratic Labour Party .
How would you compare that to what happened in France ? There there was also a surprising left-wing victory . Is it as impressive as it appears ?
I mean , they are quite different circumstances .
Of course , the elections we've just seen in France , the second round of their parliamentary elections saw a more radical left coalition led by Jean Mélenchon , who leads this France Unbowed Party , where that's again got some of the kind of old socialist party in it , but also parties of the quite radical left and the Greens .
So they topped the poll , didn't get anywhere near a majority . And then the most striking thing is the fact that the Le Pen-led National Rally block was actually pushed into third place , even though it came first in the first round .
So this is obviously under the kind of context of something which happens in France from time to time , where you have a party of the radical right often led by Le Pen , as it turns out who almost breaks through , and then what you have is the centrists and the left wingers unite in what is often referred to as a Republican front to keep out the right wing
party . Essentially , that's what happened here . Once again , you saw loads of parties , even from Emmanuel Macron's centrist bloc or from the Mélenchon-led leftist bloc , withdraw their candidates so as not to split the ante , and the pen votes , le Pen votes .
What was different this time was that usually it would be the establishment centre who would be the bigger partner in that Republican front , whereas this time around it was the left who actually got more support .
But again , it was a very strange election as far as the fact that , yes , le Pen's bloc came third but also kind of topped the poll in terms of vote share and just had their best results ever .
So , in classic kind of European establishment style , as soon as they have an election in which the populists are pushed back , they say , oh , we've dodged a bullet there . But this is not really what dodging a bullet looks like . I don't think .
But I think , because of the kind of particularities of French politics in this particular election , it's hard to draw too many comparison points from this and what's happened in the UK recently , I think .
Yeah , but let's look at the possibly a similar touchdown , which is how the Reform Party in the UK fared Nigel Farage's party and kind of the whole Brexit question of . Does this mean that Brexit or rejoining the European Union is back on the table ?
I mean , I think the establishment certainly thinks it's back on the table , the sort of centre-left establishment , the cultural elites . It's worth saying that really the Labour Party recognised that they could not get anywhere near government again if they were just going to be there . We're going to take everyone back into the European Union .
We're going to reopen the Brexit question .
In this election they explicitly ruled out joining the European Single Market or the Customs Union , the kind of two key institutions of the European Union , but at the same time they're having to kind of give a lot of nods and winks to a lot of their support base in the metropolitan centres who are basically desperate for us to re-enter the European Union .
So there's been kind of general talk of maybe we need to reopen the trade agreement it's up for renegotiation anyway . Since that we need to basically bring United Kingdom and its kind of regulatory framework closer to the European Union , to ease trade barriers and so on .
It's very euphemistic but you can't help but feel , rather than it be a kind of big repudiation of Brexit , we're going back in or we're going to renegotiate drastically different terms .
I think it's going to be a kind of salami slicing that we'll see under a Labour government and just getting closer and closer and aligning more with European Union rules and institutions , without necessarily throwing ourselves back into them .
But it's undoubted that Starmer , in particular , is going to come under tremendous pressure from a lot of his more vocals or cheerleaders in the media and in politics to be quite bold where that's concerned , because Brexit is still something that really enrages a certain section of our ruling class even all these years later .
Although I do hear you saying that his constituency amongst long-time laborites in the North , as well as kind of a constant turmoil from Farage , probably will be something that puts a damper on serious discussion of that .
Absolutely . I mean , if he's got any sense , it should . But you know we've got loads of sense . Unfortunately , the Labour Party , for instance , the story of reform in this election has understandably been the way in which they split .
The Tory vote delivered Labour seats to a lot of those because in a lot of those constituencies , but it's worth pointing out that , the way the electoral map sits now , reform came second in the election in 98 seats , 87 of which are now Labour seats , and so , particularly in places in the North East , particularly in places in the Midlands and the North in
general , you've got seats which have either been Labour this whole time or have been returned to Labour after the 2019 Tory incursions to those parts of the world . But they're heavily Eurosceptic .
They have no interest in reopening the Brexit question , and that's the balance that Starmer is now going to have to strike , which is to try to keep these two very different sections of his voting coalition together .
I would think a big issue and it was a big issue in France is immigration . One of the things that I hear from conservatives in the UK is the conservatives didn't do anything to restrict or control immigration . What is Stormer going to do ? I mean , I assume part of his base is immigrant itself . How does he do that ?
I mean , I assume you've got your open borders types there , as you know . I just saw Melanchon just said there should be open borders for climate refugees , which could be , you know , I guess maybe people from Phoenix . But so I mean , how is he going to deal with that ?
Because it seems like this has been an issue that President Biden's been had tremendous problems with .
Absolutely and , as with so much with Keir Starmer , it's just been incredibly vague so far . So he's strangely kind of attacked the Conservative Party in this election almost from the right , as if to say immigration has got out of control , they've broken their promises on it , it needs to come down . But that is about as far as his pledge has gone .
He has claimed that he's going to get a handle on the illegal immigration side of things just by setting up a new sort of border command , but it's been very vague on the details and I think a lot of people are quite are not particularly convinced that he's going to be able to get a grip on this .
But I think , in a way , because of the fact that the Tory party failed so manifestly on the immigration question , it almost diffused it as a political issue between the two of them . As strange as that sounds the scale of the deception that's happened to the Conservative Party .
They were pledging in the 2010 election , in the 2015 election , 2017 election , that they would bring down immigration to the tens of thousands it's now reached well in excess of 600,000 .
And it's one of those things which , because they have so failed to keep their promises , in a way , I think voters thought we might as well go for Labour , even though voters do want immigration to come down quite clearly .
What is the sense that you get about what a Labour government relationship with a Donald Trump government might be as we get close to the US elections ?
This is a fascinating question . It's one that the Labour Party have really been confronted with in the past few months because they've been out of power for so long . When trump was on the rise , and even when he was in office , they a lot of their members , a lot of their prominent politicians still had the luxury of being able to sound off against him .
There's one particular labor politician , a gentleman called david lammy , who at one point accused um donald trump of being a neo-nazi sympathizer . That man is now secretary . So that's going to be an interesting way of seeing how this is going to pan out . I mean , he has been kind of making entreaties to the Trump camp , trying to talk to them .
I mean , donald Trump , if nothing else , seems to have a tremendous capacity to forgive people who might have slagged him off in the past . But now , kind of kissing his backside , he seems to get out of that .
So long as they kiss the backside . He seems to get out of that . So long as they kiss the backside . Exactly , exactly .
So now that's going to work out . The idea of a Keir Starmer , you know , Donald Trump press conference at some point in the future would be absolutely hilarious to watch . But there needs to be enough kind of willingness to be flexible on the Labour side to at least try to make it work , it seems .
Well , and how does that play out ? Speaking of foreign policy and British foreign policy , how does that play out with support for Ukraine , support for whatever side this Gaza and soon to be Hezbollah war is going to be ? How does that ? What's that going to look like ?
So under Labour , on the Ukraine question , it's very much business as usual , very much continuity with the previous Conservative position . We've seen in recent days Starmer re-articulated support for that .
Now , obviously , in the grand scheme of things , as we always know , the UK position , despite all this talk of the special relationship and so on , is basically subordinate to the US position . But nevertheless , that's something which is pretty much settled between the two main political parties . The Gaza question is a little bit more complicated .
Essentially , the Labour position is that they've been calling for a ceasefire for some time now , which many of us know is kind of code for capitulation to Hamas , in response to the fact that they have historically had a very large Muslim vote .
And that is really where they've been challenged in this election , where the Labour Party haven't lost many seats in this election , where they have it's been to pro-Gaza often kind of Islamic sectarian independence in some of the inner cities .
And so they're now having to walk this very difficult line of wanting to keep the Jewish community on side , who are obviously very burnt and upset by the Jeremy Corbyn era , but at the same time trying to hold on to their much more sizable Muslim vote , who are furious with them or at least the more vocal sections of that vote are furious with them over the
Gaza question .
Well , is this also part of a thing and I'd be happy to extend it to France of kind of like the what we thought of as a and I think we've even written about a rejection of woke ism ? All you know the settler stuff , transgender , you know climate extremism that we thought was sort of ebbing Is this going to give new life to that ?
I mean , how does Starmer deal with transgender issues ? How does he deal with , you know , people who are spraying spray painting ?
uh , stonehenge that's actually been one of the quite colorful subplots this election is starmer trying to navigate these sort of culture war issues ? Because in he's he's got a well-earned reputation as a bit of a flip-flopper . So essentially a few years ago it could anything say on gender issue . He would happily mouth all the same platitudes .
He actually went for a very kind of comical and slow development on this question because he realised it was really hurting him . So there was just this series of radio interviews over the years where he would be asked to hold forth on whether or not a woman could have a penis and he would struggle to answer this question .
And he ended up coming up with this kind of middle-of-the-road answer a while ago , which is that 99.9% of women don't have a penis . But , as people pointed out , that would mean one in 1,000 women did . So he got tripped up once again . So he went to the election essentially saying that he believed in biological sex .
But even now I mean , many of his leading ministers struggle to stick up for women's sex based rights and women only spaces and so on . So he's tried to look both way on it , while still pledging in his manifesto to liberalize the rules around that kind of thing , and it's similar with various other areas of the sort of cultural climate war .
He went from praising Extinction , Rebellion , these disruptive groups , to telling them that they should get up and go home and stop causing so much damage . At the end of the day , it's quite clear which side he's breaded buttered . Then , if you look at what they're doing on policy whether it's climate , gender , race , what have you ?
It's very much from the same kind of woke hymn sheet . It's just the fact that the presentation of it is a little bit more stiff and business-like from this late government .
I'd like to move a little bit into the economic side , but there's kind of a bridge here which is at least in the United States , immigration has been a major fueling factor for economic growth , People starting new businesses coming from different countries .
With the growth of immigration in Britain , is it viewed the same way , and how will the Labour government deal with economic growth policies ?
I mean , what's become quite clear , particularly over the course of the past few years , is that the level of immigration that we've had has basically just been masking economic problems . It's been kind of used as a sticking plaster , as a palliative .
Oftentimes it kind of artificially inflate GDP figures , but when you look at GDP per head , the picture is very different . And it's been one of those things where , again , a lack of skills and training and whatever is just being masked by this .
And that's now coming to the surface , it seems , yeah , same thing is taking place in Canada , where they've had a pretty miserable growth rate but they've imported so many people that that has played some role . But I think is there any chance that the Labour government will start to say , yes , we need immigrants , but they have to be people who are going to .
A skills-based program of some kind ?
I mean , you know we're not going to take , you know , 500 people from Gaza and expect them to behave .
according to British mores on politics , I mean it seems again something where they've just tried to signal in one direction by saying immigration is too high , it must come down , tried to signal that they're going to get a handle on the illegal immigration question which in the UK is particularly around people getting on dinghies and crossing the English Channel
essentially , which is both incredibly dangerous as well as obviously bad from a national security and borders point of view . But I really think that anyone expecting immigration to drastically or even measurably reduce under this government is probably not . It's probably going to be disappointed .
I mean , when Kirsten was campaigning to be Labour leader , he was saying that they needed to remake the case for freedom of movement . So this is not really in his inclination or anyone really involved in his party . Who is not to say .
I always tend to think with the kind of figures running the Labour Party at the moment , it's not as if they've thought about this issue too deeply . It's often just the case that to be seen to be any way kind of anti-migration or anti-migrant is a no-go . So they just kind of close off and resort to the usual platitudes .
So I think anyone expecting it to come down might be disappointed . But who knows ?
Well , there's also a political side to that , which is , if you look out , say , 10 years from now , when the people who are immigrating today leaving aside the illegals that are coming across the channel , but legal immigrants become citizens and have voting rights .
This strikes me as a constituency that will be loyal to labor going forward , so it's really not in their vested interest to cut it back right .
It's going to be interesting because we see the same thing in the US and , interestingly enough , we're finding certain immigrant groups Asians and particularly Hispanics groups , asians and particularly Hispanics actually moving more to the right because A they're in jobs that are affected by climate change policy and culturally they tend to be more conservative , more family
oriented than the white majority is . So , you know , I think that it may turn out to be an unintended consequence that these people may not be as loyal labor voters . And then you know , I wonder about within labor .
They have a big Muslim constituency and maybe they are sympathetic on certain issues , but you know , I don't think Muslims are particularly oriented towards transgender , gay rights , women's rights . Does that conflict , is that conflict going to come out in the Labour Party now ?
I mean that is a really interesting question . You start to see it around the edges , where some of the people have been campaigning very heavily against the Labour Party on the question of gas and independence and so on , you'll often sometimes also hear them attack them on woke issues , kind of socially liberal issues , those kinds of things .
That's starting to crescent . It's still quite nascent at this point . But you're absolutely right about how , just you know , high levels of immigration does not necessarily kind of lock in a Labour Party sort of majority forever .
Interestingly , before the Tory collapse you actually start to see some interesting things happen with the ethnic minority vote under the surface .
I mean , british Indians are still breaking , I think , to the tory party about 50 , 50 with labor , which is a relatively new development because , um , very , you know broadly speaking , um well integrated , successful minority group , um , ones who are , you know , equally kind of skeptical about high levels of immigration .
And again it's just a kind of a reminder that that whole kind of sceptical about high levels of immigration and again it's just a kind of a reminder that that whole kind of demographics is destiny sort of way of looking at electoral politics doesn't always shake out , but for the moment at least it does feel like the Labour Party .
These issues have been slightly masked , I guess , by the level of the landslide that they've had , but it's not to say that they're going to be masked forever .
You know , I'd like to focus on the contrast between Britain's political environment and leadership environment and the US . So we , here it is , we're dealing with two almost octogenarians . And you know , let's call Trump an octogenarian because by the time he's done he'll be an octogenarian .
You know , let's call Trump an octogenarian because by the time he's done he'll be an octogenarian . And it seems as though this generational shift from the baby boom to the next generation hasn't really effectively happened here at the highest levels , and it seems like it actually has in the UK . Is there a sense about age in leadership in Britain ? How does it ?
How do people view ?
the US and how do you view your own generational shift ? That's an interesting question because it certainly hasn't been as stark in the UK as it has been over in the US , where very much I mean the baby boomers are . In the case of Biden , what's ?
The silent generations have been really still clinging on to power to a point where obviously in his case that really can't go on Because at some point you're not going to be able to cling on to anything , it seems like . But in the UK it's a slightly different picture .
I mean , rishi Sunak , who we've just dispensed with , is a relatively young prime minister in his 40s . Keir Starmer is actually in his early 60s , I believe . But at the same time there is a kind of sense in which that generationalism is an issue in politics . People talk about how young people have been screwed over .
Broadly speaking , the Labour Party can still attract that significant element of the youth vote , but it's not as encapsulated in the very kind of top tier of our politics .
in quite the same way it is in the US , I wouldn't say is in the US , I wouldn't say Well , I mean , I think one thing that I appreciated being in Britain recently was that you know that I wasn't surrounded by campaign posters .
You know , you really wouldn't have known that there was an election I can tell you , when you're in the United States in this fall you won't be able to escape .
Avoid it I mean even you know , because the ferociousness of the of the conflict , um , it almost seemed to me that , you know , had it been farage against , against starmer , it might have been more interesting .
And you know , having sunak there was like , well , you knew this guy was going to lose no matter what , so , um , so you , it wasn't particularly interesting . But I just want to you know , before we end , that one thing I did notice in the UK is well , two things . One , almost every service job was done by an immigrant or the children of immigrants .
I mean , I mean , you saw very , very few young Britons engaged in almost any economic activity except at the high level . What is is Britain ? Does Stormer own have any vision of how to get the British economy going ? I mean , the gap between our economy and Britain's economy is the highest I've seen in my lifetime .
I mean , maybe you would have to go back to Harold Wilson or something before you would have this sort of situation . Is there any idea that what Starmer will do for the British economy ? How is the city reacting to this election and what policies could get Britain back on its feet ?
I think it's a really interesting question , not least because get Britain back on its feet . I think it's a really interesting question not least because Starmer has actually made the question of bringing growth back to the British economy very central .
I mean , it's basically been their answer to the question of how are you going to improve public services without really raising taxes ? How are you going to ensure that we can continue to maintain economic stability even with the debt as high as it is 100% of GDP , and so on . Their answer , their presentation of this , was that we need to go for growth .
Now , obviously , no one's against growth apart from some crazy Greens , of course but that's something which , when you look at the way in which they intend to get it and what they want to funnel it into , it's quite clear that we're on a hiding to nothing really .
So today , our Chancellor , in effect , our Finance Minister , gave a big speech in which she announced we're going to really rip up the planning laws . We're going to reform the planning laws , which have been a real , genuine kind of restriction on house building and economic activity more broadly .
But the first thing she announces is that we're going to end the ban on onshore wind .
That was the big announcement and it very much marries up with their general kind of economic outlook , which is , the way that we're going to bring economic renewal to the UK is by embracing renewable energy , is by building wind farms everywhere , is by really trying to take us down that route , and I think that's the core contradiction .
They basically want to get growth via green means , which doesn't work , and I think that's something which is going to become clear sooner rather than later .
I mean , they're committed in their manifesto to basically decarbonising the electricity grid by 2030 , which , aside from anything else , is just never going to happen , and a lot of money is going to be expended towards that .
So , even though they have really made the question of economic renewal and economic growth central to their pitch at this election , and also because they're kind of a very kind of business-like middle-of-the-road Labour Party , they really haven't spooked the markets in a way that we might have seen previously .
The core of their offer is nonsensical , and so , again , anyone expecting there to be a kind of measurable difference anytime soon , I think we'll be waiting quite a long time well , and is there any discussion short term about interest rates ? that's not something which is featured as at all , really at this point .
Really they are seen as the kind of steady-as-they-go sort of party . That certainly hasn't kind of caused any kind of concern around those kinds of indicators . But we wait and see really , because , again , the economy of the UK is still so fragile . That's one thing that really hasn't been properly appreciated in a lot of the debate we've had so far .
I don't think so , from a populist or popular perspective , really hasn't been properly appreciated in a lot of debate we've had so far and everything . So , from a populist or popular perspective , people seem to be embracing predictability , steady as she goes , maybe a little boring , at the expense of fireworks .
Does that seem to sum it up as far as the public sentiment ?
That's certainly what we've ended up with . But I would go back to my point really at the beginning really , which is that this is a government which is boring , which is steady as she goes , which is very much kind of married to all of the failed elite orthodoxies of our time , whether that's on green issues or what have you .
But this is a government that won by default . This is a government that won because the conservative vote collapsed and because there's no real viable , more populist alternative to the Labour Party at this point . But really , the story of the last few elections is that electoral politics in the UK is more volatile than basically ever has been .
Certainly and certainly that it has been the post-war period . More people are switching parties than ever before . We're seeing governments rise and fall almost as quickly .
So whilst for now we're kind of lumbered with a ruling party which doesn't really seem to have any of the answers , and if anything could make things worse , I don't think it would be long before we could see them being quite significantly humbled at another election .
Yeah , so running away from not running to something positive or distinct .
Yeah , I mean , I think we have a similar situation here . Actually , I've thought about writing something to say that this would be a good election to lose , because what's going to be after four years of Kamala Harris or four years of Donald Trump ? It'll be equally bad results . So you know , I mean , you know , I mean .
The problem is that Western countries in general UK , france , us and this may be a good thing to sort of conclude around seem not to have a political program that addresses the issues that are driving our economies and societies , and is that something you would sense in the UK too ?
Oh , absolutely .
I think there's a very clear sense that we're beset by real fundamental kind of structural problems , economic problems , the fundamental issues which have just never actually been addressed , whether that's around house building , whether that's around productivity , whether that's around any of these kind of core fundamentals to what allows citizens to live a good life , and it's
just been entirely absent from the election debate and to the extent that questions of economic growth and economic renewal have been there , it's this snake oil around renewable energy , this bizarre idea that we can become a kind of wind superpower , the Saudi Arabian wind , as Boris Johnson must try to put it Well , and it's obviously not going to .
Well , and you know , in addition to the economic cost of doing that , one of the questions I think we're starting to deal with here is would it make a difference , even if you were successful at it ?
Right , you know , what I was reading the other day is look , at the end of the day , unless China and India stop coal and using coal for everything , the notion that we're going to be greatly improving our carbon footprint in the world is nonsensical .
And you know , in California we are going to extremes to be able to put in green policies , but at the end of the day , it makes zero difference in terms of our carbon footprint .
And I think it's also relevant to the UK what we find here , which is when we regulate , we decarbonize and make that a priority those industries which are actually quite regulated in California , they go to Texas , where they're less regulated . They go to China , where they're even less regulated .
So , like one of the things that strikes me and I don't mean it in a negative sense so much when you used to go to Britain you would bring back things made in Britain . The only thing I can think of now is shortbread , which I could buy in the supermarket here .
But that's one of the things that is increasingly infuriating . Sometimes our own political class will pat us on the back for the amount that we have reduced our emissions over a period of decades .
That's largely because we've just we don't make anything anymore , and increasingly we don't produce our own energy , we don't exploit the fossil fuel reserves that we have here , and that's another thing that Labour have come in saying that no new licences for oil and gas in the North Sea . I think you're absolutely right .
What's interesting to me , though , is that whilst I think maybe in America there's been a slightly more lively debate about some of these green issues for a slightly longer time , in Europe that hasn't really been the case in the same period , but now we're seeing across Europe , and in the UK as well , in the form of the Reform Party , parties and movements and
politicians who are explicitly saying get rid of net zero , who are explicitly saying the European Green Deal is going to destroy our agriculture and we're not going to have any of it . This has actually become an electoral issue and a point of , even in Europe , kind of protests in the streets in a way that we haven't seen at all .
So the kind of ironclad consensus around these environmentalists and net zero issues is really starting to break down in a way that I certainly didn't foresee happening this quickly .
Well , and you know , the interesting question and we'll see how this comes to into play both in Britain and here is the cancellation policy of anybody who talks negatively about net zero . Right , it is one of those shibboleths that cannot be cannot be spoken poorly about .
Well , one big difference , of course , is we have the Bill of Rights and you don't . And so so and , by the way , same thing's true in Canada . You know , I mean , Trudeau proposed a law where you could arrest people before they committed a crime .
I mean , I don't think that would make constitutional muster in the United States which I hope not constitutional muster in the United States , which I hope not . Unless AOC got to appoint the Supreme Court , then we might get it . But if we're looking forward , what would be your prognosis for the next few years for the UK after this election ?
And if you could put that in a European context , that would be great .
Well , I think what we're going to see is this labor government having an incredibly short honeymoon period that's my sense because of all the things we've talked about .
They have not got a resounding democratic mandate , they're also trying to hold together a very kind of shaky coalition , and also the fact that we're in the midst of a load of economic , let alone geopolitical , problems which , um , no one is really convinced that this Labour Party or any of the mainstream parties really have the answers to , and I think that ,
particularly in an environment in which the question of cheap and plentiful energy and the lack of it as it currently stands , has become so core to our debate , that's something which is really going to bite them . So I think , even though this seems like a very stable majority , I think the debate is going to be incredibly unstable .
I think there's going to be a lot of criticisms coming down the pipe from them very quickly , and also , I think we're going to see the sort of disaffection with the mainstream consensus on green issues or cultural issues or whatever express itself sooner rather than later . This reform insurgency proves that that is still there .
It's just kind of lacking a more viable outlet , shall we say , and I think it won't be very long before we start to see that kind of pushback from voters in the way that we have seen across Europe .
I think what often happens is whenever you see one European country have a populist government fall or another European country have a populist government rise depending on who you're talking to , they'll say that that's clear that Europe is turning to the right , or Europe is turning populist , or the populist insurgency is over .
If the inverse is true , I think what's quite clearly happened is , across Europe we now kind of have the two poles of politics are now broadly populist and anti-populist , and just different countries are a different point in that in that cycle .
So even though it does feel like Britain is just unanimously voted in a centre left government , that's really not the case under the surface and I don't think it will be long until they find themselves being battered by some of these headwinds themselves .
Well , that couldn't do better than that , yeah really , tom .
Thank you so much for joining us and for your great analysis , and we look forward to seeing how all of this plays out and hopefully you'll be able to come back and be a guest again on the Feudal Future podcast .
And don't forget to go to spikecom for your best analysis .
Yeah , you know . Just a quick thing on that For those of you who don't know , Spike , it is a wonderful media outlet that has stories that you will never see anywhere else and provides a tremendous breadth of opinion on all sorts of topics . So kudos to you , Tom , and great job . Thanks so much for having me today .
I've enjoyed it Great and thank you all for joining us on the Feudal Future podcast .