British Elections-European Populism and Its Impact on the UK - podcast episode cover

British Elections-European Populism and Its Impact on the UK

Aug 07, 202436 minSeason 3Ep. 38
--:--
--:--
Listen in podcast apps:
Metacast
Spotify
Youtube
RSS

Episode description

Labour's unexpected triumph and the Conservative Party’s dramatic collapse signal a seismic shift in British politics. Join us as Tom Slater, editor of Spiked, dissects the election results, revealing how Labour managed to capture victory with just 34% of the vote and the implications of the Conservative Party's loss to the right-wing Reform Party. We also draw fascinating parallels with France's left-wing surge led by Jean Mélenchon's coalition, shedding light on the broader European trend of establishment parties banding together against populist movements.

Imagine a press conference between Keir Starmer and Donald Trump—what fireworks might fly? We explore this intriguing hypothetical scenario, delving into Starmer’s foreign policy on Ukraine and Gaza and his delicate balancing act between Jewish and Muslim supporters. Our discussion broadens to cover Labour’s stance on cultural and social issues, such as gender, environmental activism, and the rejection of wokeism. We also scrutinize Labour's economic policies, focusing on a potential shift to a more skills-based immigration system aimed at fostering economic growth.

The economic challenges facing the UK are immense, and we analyze Labour’s response with the youthful leadership of Rishi Sunak juxtaposed against Keir Starmer’s steady yet uninspiring image. Can Labour’s green energy initiatives succeed in decarbonizing the electricity grid by 2030? We tackle this question while also considering the growing backlash against stringent environmental policies. Tune in to understand how Labour’s victory stems as much from the Conservative collapse as from their own policies, and how UK politics is being reshaped in the context of broader European populist sentiments.

Support Our Work
The Center for Demographics and Policy focuses on research and analysis of global, national, and regional demographic trends and explores policies that might produce favorable demographic results over time. It involves Chapman students in demographic research under the supervision of the Center’s senior staff.

Students work with the Center’s director and engage in research that will serve them well as they look to develop their careers in business, the social sciences, and the arts. Students also have access to our advisory board, which includes distinguished Chapman faculty and major demographic scholars from across the country and the world.

For additional information, please contact Mahnaz Asghari, Associate Director for the Center for Demographics and Policy, at (714) 744-7635 or [email protected].

Follow us on LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-feudal-future-podcast/

Tweet thoughts: @joelkotkin, @mtoplansky, #FeudalFuture #BeyondFeudalism

Learn more about Joel's book 'The Coming of Neo-Feudalism': https://amzn.to/3a1VV87

Sign Up For News & Alerts: http://joelkotkin.com/#subscribe

This show is presented by the Chapman Center for Demographics and Policy, which focuses on research and analysis of global, national and regional demographic trends and explores policies that might produce favorable demographic results over time.

Transcript

Speaker 1

The Feudal Future Podcast .

Speaker 2

Hello and welcome to another episode of the Feudal Future Podcast . I'm Marshall Toplansky , I'm Joel Kotkin and today we are going to be dissecting the British elections that just happened , and to help us do that is Tom Slater , who is editor of Spiked Tom . Welcome , thanks for having me .

Well , this was just one of the craziest election cycles around the world , I think , including , by the way , not you know , looking at the United States is not necessarily the exemplar of the world . But let's get into it . Joel , do you want to start us off ?

Speaker 1

Yeah , I mean this is one of the things that we talk about . A lot is unintended consequences , and certainly we have , in both Britain and now in France , what might be the unintended consequence of what appears to be a resurgence of the left . Is that overstated or is there some reality to that ?

Speaker 3

Well , I think just in the British example , on paper the election that we've just had looks like a tremendous vindication of the Labour Party , our centre-left party , I mean it got closest to the 1997 new Labour landslide in scale . It was only really a few seats short of that . The Conservatives reduced down to 121 seats .

That's their worst ever results by any serious metric . But it was a really weird election insofar as in the end the Labour Party only got around 34% of the vote , which is the lowest percentage which any majority party has got in the post-war era . Really odd kind of election we've had .

Turnout was down to 60% , which is , I think , the second lowest turnout figure that we've had in a general election on record . And so you put those two numbers together and you basically had Labour getting this incredible 170-something seat majority , but on the basis of about 20% of the voting public actually voting .

So really the story of this election is very much the collapse of this election is very much the collapse of the Conservative Party .

It's bleeding of support to this insurgent right , populist party called Reform to its right , and it's very much the kind of the collapse of the post-Brexit Conservatives really than it is Labour which kind of just won by default really , in this election , well , and given the fact that it's the centre-left that now has won , what is it you think voters are saying ?

Speaker 2

Why did they change course ?

Speaker 3

I think more than anything it was a rejection of the Conservatives . On the one hand there's obviously a big kind of anti-Tory voting bloc in the UK . It's gone particularly vociferous in the wake of Brexit .

Particularly , I think kind of professional , managerial class type voters , public sector workers and whatever have got increasingly enraged with the Tory government for kind of obvious reasons .

Kind of coalition that was carved out in the previous election in the wake of Brexit , which was this new alliance between the kind of Conservatives' more traditional support base and this new support that they carved out in the Midlands , in the North , amongst working class voters , constituencies which had voted Labour for as long as there was a Labour party .

That coalition broke down so you had large sections of the kind of Northern working class vote go to this reform party . A lot of them also just go back to not voting and some of them going back into the Labour column . But really again the story is of is of Tory collapse rather than the public deciding .

You know what we're desperate to return to sort of technocratic , technocratic Labour Party .

Speaker 1

How would you compare that to what happened in France ? There there was also a surprising left-wing victory . Is it as impressive as it appears ?

Speaker 3

I mean , they are quite different circumstances .

Of course , the elections we've just seen in France , the second round of their parliamentary elections saw a more radical left coalition led by Jean Mélenchon , who leads this France Unbowed Party , where that's again got some of the kind of old socialist party in it , but also parties of the quite radical left and the Greens .

So they topped the poll , didn't get anywhere near a majority . And then the most striking thing is the fact that the Le Pen-led National Rally block was actually pushed into third place , even though it came first in the first round .

So this is obviously under the kind of context of something which happens in France from time to time , where you have a party of the radical right often led by Le Pen , as it turns out who almost breaks through , and then what you have is the centrists and the left wingers unite in what is often referred to as a Republican front to keep out the right wing

party . Essentially , that's what happened here . Once again , you saw loads of parties , even from Emmanuel Macron's centrist bloc or from the Mélenchon-led leftist bloc , withdraw their candidates so as not to split the ante , and the pen votes , le Pen votes .

What was different this time was that usually it would be the establishment centre who would be the bigger partner in that Republican front , whereas this time around it was the left who actually got more support .

But again , it was a very strange election as far as the fact that , yes , le Pen's bloc came third but also kind of topped the poll in terms of vote share and just had their best results ever .

So , in classic kind of European establishment style , as soon as they have an election in which the populists are pushed back , they say , oh , we've dodged a bullet there . But this is not really what dodging a bullet looks like . I don't think .

But I think , because of the kind of particularities of French politics in this particular election , it's hard to draw too many comparison points from this and what's happened in the UK recently , I think .

Speaker 2

Yeah , but let's look at the possibly a similar touchdown , which is how the Reform Party in the UK fared Nigel Farage's party and kind of the whole Brexit question of . Does this mean that Brexit or rejoining the European Union is back on the table ?

Speaker 3

I mean , I think the establishment certainly thinks it's back on the table , the sort of centre-left establishment , the cultural elites . It's worth saying that really the Labour Party recognised that they could not get anywhere near government again if they were just going to be there . We're going to take everyone back into the European Union .

We're going to reopen the Brexit question .

In this election they explicitly ruled out joining the European Single Market or the Customs Union , the kind of two key institutions of the European Union , but at the same time they're having to kind of give a lot of nods and winks to a lot of their support base in the metropolitan centres who are basically desperate for us to re-enter the European Union .

So there's been kind of general talk of maybe we need to reopen the trade agreement it's up for renegotiation anyway . Since that we need to basically bring United Kingdom and its kind of regulatory framework closer to the European Union , to ease trade barriers and so on .

It's very euphemistic but you can't help but feel , rather than it be a kind of big repudiation of Brexit , we're going back in or we're going to renegotiate drastically different terms .

I think it's going to be a kind of salami slicing that we'll see under a Labour government and just getting closer and closer and aligning more with European Union rules and institutions , without necessarily throwing ourselves back into them .

But it's undoubted that Starmer , in particular , is going to come under tremendous pressure from a lot of his more vocals or cheerleaders in the media and in politics to be quite bold where that's concerned , because Brexit is still something that really enrages a certain section of our ruling class even all these years later .

Speaker 2

Although I do hear you saying that his constituency amongst long-time laborites in the North , as well as kind of a constant turmoil from Farage , probably will be something that puts a damper on serious discussion of that .

Speaker 3

Absolutely . I mean , if he's got any sense , it should . But you know we've got loads of sense . Unfortunately , the Labour Party , for instance , the story of reform in this election has understandably been the way in which they split .

The Tory vote delivered Labour seats to a lot of those because in a lot of those constituencies , but it's worth pointing out that , the way the electoral map sits now , reform came second in the election in 98 seats , 87 of which are now Labour seats , and so , particularly in places in the North East , particularly in places in the Midlands and the North in

general , you've got seats which have either been Labour this whole time or have been returned to Labour after the 2019 Tory incursions to those parts of the world . But they're heavily Eurosceptic .

They have no interest in reopening the Brexit question , and that's the balance that Starmer is now going to have to strike , which is to try to keep these two very different sections of his voting coalition together .

Speaker 1

I would think a big issue and it was a big issue in France is immigration . One of the things that I hear from conservatives in the UK is the conservatives didn't do anything to restrict or control immigration . What is Stormer going to do ? I mean , I assume part of his base is immigrant itself . How does he do that ?

I mean , I assume you've got your open borders types there , as you know . I just saw Melanchon just said there should be open borders for climate refugees , which could be , you know , I guess maybe people from Phoenix . But so I mean , how is he going to deal with that ?

Because it seems like this has been an issue that President Biden's been had tremendous problems with .

Speaker 3

Absolutely and , as with so much with Keir Starmer , it's just been incredibly vague so far . So he's strangely kind of attacked the Conservative Party in this election almost from the right , as if to say immigration has got out of control , they've broken their promises on it , it needs to come down . But that is about as far as his pledge has gone .

He has claimed that he's going to get a handle on the illegal immigration side of things just by setting up a new sort of border command , but it's been very vague on the details and I think a lot of people are quite are not particularly convinced that he's going to be able to get a grip on this .

But I think , in a way , because of the fact that the Tory party failed so manifestly on the immigration question , it almost diffused it as a political issue between the two of them . As strange as that sounds the scale of the deception that's happened to the Conservative Party .

They were pledging in the 2010 election , in the 2015 election , 2017 election , that they would bring down immigration to the tens of thousands it's now reached well in excess of 600,000 .

And it's one of those things which , because they have so failed to keep their promises , in a way , I think voters thought we might as well go for Labour , even though voters do want immigration to come down quite clearly .

Speaker 2

What is the sense that you get about what a Labour government relationship with a Donald Trump government might be as we get close to the US elections ?

Speaker 3

This is a fascinating question . It's one that the Labour Party have really been confronted with in the past few months because they've been out of power for so long . When trump was on the rise , and even when he was in office , they a lot of their members , a lot of their prominent politicians still had the luxury of being able to sound off against him .

There's one particular labor politician , a gentleman called david lammy , who at one point accused um donald trump of being a neo-nazi sympathizer . That man is now secretary . So that's going to be an interesting way of seeing how this is going to pan out . I mean , he has been kind of making entreaties to the Trump camp , trying to talk to them .

I mean , donald Trump , if nothing else , seems to have a tremendous capacity to forgive people who might have slagged him off in the past . But now , kind of kissing his backside , he seems to get out of that .

Speaker 2

So long as they kiss the backside . He seems to get out of that . So long as they kiss the backside . Exactly , exactly .

Speaker 3

So now that's going to work out . The idea of a Keir Starmer , you know , Donald Trump press conference at some point in the future would be absolutely hilarious to watch . But there needs to be enough kind of willingness to be flexible on the Labour side to at least try to make it work , it seems .

Speaker 2

Well , and how does that play out ? Speaking of foreign policy and British foreign policy , how does that play out with support for Ukraine , support for whatever side this Gaza and soon to be Hezbollah war is going to be ? How does that ? What's that going to look like ?

Speaker 3

So under Labour , on the Ukraine question , it's very much business as usual , very much continuity with the previous Conservative position . We've seen in recent days Starmer re-articulated support for that .

Now , obviously , in the grand scheme of things , as we always know , the UK position , despite all this talk of the special relationship and so on , is basically subordinate to the US position . But nevertheless , that's something which is pretty much settled between the two main political parties . The Gaza question is a little bit more complicated .

Essentially , the Labour position is that they've been calling for a ceasefire for some time now , which many of us know is kind of code for capitulation to Hamas , in response to the fact that they have historically had a very large Muslim vote .

And that is really where they've been challenged in this election , where the Labour Party haven't lost many seats in this election , where they have it's been to pro-Gaza often kind of Islamic sectarian independence in some of the inner cities .

And so they're now having to walk this very difficult line of wanting to keep the Jewish community on side , who are obviously very burnt and upset by the Jeremy Corbyn era , but at the same time trying to hold on to their much more sizable Muslim vote , who are furious with them or at least the more vocal sections of that vote are furious with them over the

Gaza question .

Speaker 1

Well , is this also part of a thing and I'd be happy to extend it to France of kind of like the what we thought of as a and I think we've even written about a rejection of woke ism ? All you know the settler stuff , transgender , you know climate extremism that we thought was sort of ebbing Is this going to give new life to that ?

I mean , how does Starmer deal with transgender issues ? How does he deal with , you know , people who are spraying spray painting ?

Speaker 3

uh , stonehenge that's actually been one of the quite colorful subplots this election is starmer trying to navigate these sort of culture war issues ? Because in he's he's got a well-earned reputation as a bit of a flip-flopper . So essentially a few years ago it could anything say on gender issue . He would happily mouth all the same platitudes .

He actually went for a very kind of comical and slow development on this question because he realised it was really hurting him . So there was just this series of radio interviews over the years where he would be asked to hold forth on whether or not a woman could have a penis and he would struggle to answer this question .

And he ended up coming up with this kind of middle-of-the-road answer a while ago , which is that 99.9% of women don't have a penis . But , as people pointed out , that would mean one in 1,000 women did . So he got tripped up once again . So he went to the election essentially saying that he believed in biological sex .

But even now I mean , many of his leading ministers struggle to stick up for women's sex based rights and women only spaces and so on . So he's tried to look both way on it , while still pledging in his manifesto to liberalize the rules around that kind of thing , and it's similar with various other areas of the sort of cultural climate war .

He went from praising Extinction , Rebellion , these disruptive groups , to telling them that they should get up and go home and stop causing so much damage . At the end of the day , it's quite clear which side he's breaded buttered . Then , if you look at what they're doing on policy whether it's climate , gender , race , what have you ?

It's very much from the same kind of woke hymn sheet . It's just the fact that the presentation of it is a little bit more stiff and business-like from this late government .

Speaker 2

I'd like to move a little bit into the economic side , but there's kind of a bridge here which is at least in the United States , immigration has been a major fueling factor for economic growth , People starting new businesses coming from different countries .

With the growth of immigration in Britain , is it viewed the same way , and how will the Labour government deal with economic growth policies ?

Speaker 3

I mean , what's become quite clear , particularly over the course of the past few years , is that the level of immigration that we've had has basically just been masking economic problems . It's been kind of used as a sticking plaster , as a palliative .

Oftentimes it kind of artificially inflate GDP figures , but when you look at GDP per head , the picture is very different . And it's been one of those things where , again , a lack of skills and training and whatever is just being masked by this .

Speaker 1

And that's now coming to the surface , it seems , yeah , same thing is taking place in Canada , where they've had a pretty miserable growth rate but they've imported so many people that that has played some role . But I think is there any chance that the Labour government will start to say , yes , we need immigrants , but they have to be people who are going to .

Speaker 2

A skills-based program of some kind ?

Speaker 1

I mean , you know we're not going to take , you know , 500 people from Gaza and expect them to behave .

Speaker 3

according to British mores on politics , I mean it seems again something where they've just tried to signal in one direction by saying immigration is too high , it must come down , tried to signal that they're going to get a handle on the illegal immigration question which in the UK is particularly around people getting on dinghies and crossing the English Channel

essentially , which is both incredibly dangerous as well as obviously bad from a national security and borders point of view . But I really think that anyone expecting immigration to drastically or even measurably reduce under this government is probably not . It's probably going to be disappointed .

I mean , when Kirsten was campaigning to be Labour leader , he was saying that they needed to remake the case for freedom of movement . So this is not really in his inclination or anyone really involved in his party . Who is not to say .

I always tend to think with the kind of figures running the Labour Party at the moment , it's not as if they've thought about this issue too deeply . It's often just the case that to be seen to be any way kind of anti-migration or anti-migrant is a no-go . So they just kind of close off and resort to the usual platitudes .

So I think anyone expecting it to come down might be disappointed . But who knows ?

Speaker 2

Well , there's also a political side to that , which is , if you look out , say , 10 years from now , when the people who are immigrating today leaving aside the illegals that are coming across the channel , but legal immigrants become citizens and have voting rights .

This strikes me as a constituency that will be loyal to labor going forward , so it's really not in their vested interest to cut it back right .

Speaker 1

It's going to be interesting because we see the same thing in the US and , interestingly enough , we're finding certain immigrant groups Asians and particularly Hispanics groups , asians and particularly Hispanics actually moving more to the right because A they're in jobs that are affected by climate change policy and culturally they tend to be more conservative , more family

oriented than the white majority is . So , you know , I think that it may turn out to be an unintended consequence that these people may not be as loyal labor voters . And then you know , I wonder about within labor .

They have a big Muslim constituency and maybe they are sympathetic on certain issues , but you know , I don't think Muslims are particularly oriented towards transgender , gay rights , women's rights . Does that conflict , is that conflict going to come out in the Labour Party now ?

Speaker 3

I mean that is a really interesting question . You start to see it around the edges , where some of the people have been campaigning very heavily against the Labour Party on the question of gas and independence and so on , you'll often sometimes also hear them attack them on woke issues , kind of socially liberal issues , those kinds of things .

That's starting to crescent . It's still quite nascent at this point . But you're absolutely right about how , just you know , high levels of immigration does not necessarily kind of lock in a Labour Party sort of majority forever .

Interestingly , before the Tory collapse you actually start to see some interesting things happen with the ethnic minority vote under the surface .

I mean , british Indians are still breaking , I think , to the tory party about 50 , 50 with labor , which is a relatively new development because , um , very , you know broadly speaking , um well integrated , successful minority group , um , ones who are , you know , equally kind of skeptical about high levels of immigration .

And again it's just a kind of a reminder that that whole kind of sceptical about high levels of immigration and again it's just a kind of a reminder that that whole kind of demographics is destiny sort of way of looking at electoral politics doesn't always shake out , but for the moment at least it does feel like the Labour Party .

These issues have been slightly masked , I guess , by the level of the landslide that they've had , but it's not to say that they're going to be masked forever .

Speaker 2

You know , I'd like to focus on the contrast between Britain's political environment and leadership environment and the US . So we , here it is , we're dealing with two almost octogenarians . And you know , let's call Trump an octogenarian because by the time he's done he'll be an octogenarian .

You know , let's call Trump an octogenarian because by the time he's done he'll be an octogenarian . And it seems as though this generational shift from the baby boom to the next generation hasn't really effectively happened here at the highest levels , and it seems like it actually has in the UK . Is there a sense about age in leadership in Britain ? How does it ?

How do people view ?

Speaker 3

the US and how do you view your own generational shift ? That's an interesting question because it certainly hasn't been as stark in the UK as it has been over in the US , where very much I mean the baby boomers are . In the case of Biden , what's ?

The silent generations have been really still clinging on to power to a point where obviously in his case that really can't go on Because at some point you're not going to be able to cling on to anything , it seems like . But in the UK it's a slightly different picture .

I mean , rishi Sunak , who we've just dispensed with , is a relatively young prime minister in his 40s . Keir Starmer is actually in his early 60s , I believe . But at the same time there is a kind of sense in which that generationalism is an issue in politics . People talk about how young people have been screwed over .

Broadly speaking , the Labour Party can still attract that significant element of the youth vote , but it's not as encapsulated in the very kind of top tier of our politics .

Speaker 1

in quite the same way it is in the US , I wouldn't say is in the US , I wouldn't say Well , I mean , I think one thing that I appreciated being in Britain recently was that you know that I wasn't surrounded by campaign posters .

You know , you really wouldn't have known that there was an election I can tell you , when you're in the United States in this fall you won't be able to escape .

Avoid it I mean even you know , because the ferociousness of the of the conflict , um , it almost seemed to me that , you know , had it been farage against , against starmer , it might have been more interesting .

And you know , having sunak there was like , well , you knew this guy was going to lose no matter what , so , um , so you , it wasn't particularly interesting . But I just want to you know , before we end , that one thing I did notice in the UK is well , two things . One , almost every service job was done by an immigrant or the children of immigrants .

I mean , I mean , you saw very , very few young Britons engaged in almost any economic activity except at the high level . What is is Britain ? Does Stormer own have any vision of how to get the British economy going ? I mean , the gap between our economy and Britain's economy is the highest I've seen in my lifetime .

I mean , maybe you would have to go back to Harold Wilson or something before you would have this sort of situation . Is there any idea that what Starmer will do for the British economy ? How is the city reacting to this election and what policies could get Britain back on its feet ?

Speaker 3

I think it's a really interesting question , not least because get Britain back on its feet . I think it's a really interesting question not least because Starmer has actually made the question of bringing growth back to the British economy very central .

I mean , it's basically been their answer to the question of how are you going to improve public services without really raising taxes ? How are you going to ensure that we can continue to maintain economic stability even with the debt as high as it is 100% of GDP , and so on . Their answer , their presentation of this , was that we need to go for growth .

Now , obviously , no one's against growth apart from some crazy Greens , of course but that's something which , when you look at the way in which they intend to get it and what they want to funnel it into , it's quite clear that we're on a hiding to nothing really .

So today , our Chancellor , in effect , our Finance Minister , gave a big speech in which she announced we're going to really rip up the planning laws . We're going to reform the planning laws , which have been a real , genuine kind of restriction on house building and economic activity more broadly .

But the first thing she announces is that we're going to end the ban on onshore wind .

That was the big announcement and it very much marries up with their general kind of economic outlook , which is , the way that we're going to bring economic renewal to the UK is by embracing renewable energy , is by building wind farms everywhere , is by really trying to take us down that route , and I think that's the core contradiction .

They basically want to get growth via green means , which doesn't work , and I think that's something which is going to become clear sooner rather than later .

I mean , they're committed in their manifesto to basically decarbonising the electricity grid by 2030 , which , aside from anything else , is just never going to happen , and a lot of money is going to be expended towards that .

So , even though they have really made the question of economic renewal and economic growth central to their pitch at this election , and also because they're kind of a very kind of business-like middle-of-the-road Labour Party , they really haven't spooked the markets in a way that we might have seen previously .

The core of their offer is nonsensical , and so , again , anyone expecting there to be a kind of measurable difference anytime soon , I think we'll be waiting quite a long time well , and is there any discussion short term about interest rates ? that's not something which is featured as at all , really at this point .

Really they are seen as the kind of steady-as-they-go sort of party . That certainly hasn't kind of caused any kind of concern around those kinds of indicators . But we wait and see really , because , again , the economy of the UK is still so fragile . That's one thing that really hasn't been properly appreciated in a lot of the debate we've had so far .

Speaker 2

I don't think so , from a populist or popular perspective , really hasn't been properly appreciated in a lot of debate we've had so far and everything . So , from a populist or popular perspective , people seem to be embracing predictability , steady as she goes , maybe a little boring , at the expense of fireworks .

Does that seem to sum it up as far as the public sentiment ?

Speaker 3

That's certainly what we've ended up with . But I would go back to my point really at the beginning really , which is that this is a government which is boring , which is steady as she goes , which is very much kind of married to all of the failed elite orthodoxies of our time , whether that's on green issues or what have you .

But this is a government that won by default . This is a government that won because the conservative vote collapsed and because there's no real viable , more populist alternative to the Labour Party at this point . But really , the story of the last few elections is that electoral politics in the UK is more volatile than basically ever has been .

Certainly and certainly that it has been the post-war period . More people are switching parties than ever before . We're seeing governments rise and fall almost as quickly .

So whilst for now we're kind of lumbered with a ruling party which doesn't really seem to have any of the answers , and if anything could make things worse , I don't think it would be long before we could see them being quite significantly humbled at another election .

Speaker 2

Yeah , so running away from not running to something positive or distinct .

Speaker 1

Yeah , I mean , I think we have a similar situation here . Actually , I've thought about writing something to say that this would be a good election to lose , because what's going to be after four years of Kamala Harris or four years of Donald Trump ? It'll be equally bad results . So you know , I mean , you know , I mean .

The problem is that Western countries in general UK , france , us and this may be a good thing to sort of conclude around seem not to have a political program that addresses the issues that are driving our economies and societies , and is that something you would sense in the UK too ?

Speaker 3

Oh , absolutely .

I think there's a very clear sense that we're beset by real fundamental kind of structural problems , economic problems , the fundamental issues which have just never actually been addressed , whether that's around house building , whether that's around productivity , whether that's around any of these kind of core fundamentals to what allows citizens to live a good life , and it's

just been entirely absent from the election debate and to the extent that questions of economic growth and economic renewal have been there , it's this snake oil around renewable energy , this bizarre idea that we can become a kind of wind superpower , the Saudi Arabian wind , as Boris Johnson must try to put it Well , and it's obviously not going to .

Speaker 2

Well , and you know , in addition to the economic cost of doing that , one of the questions I think we're starting to deal with here is would it make a difference , even if you were successful at it ?

Right , you know , what I was reading the other day is look , at the end of the day , unless China and India stop coal and using coal for everything , the notion that we're going to be greatly improving our carbon footprint in the world is nonsensical .

And you know , in California we are going to extremes to be able to put in green policies , but at the end of the day , it makes zero difference in terms of our carbon footprint .

Speaker 1

And I think it's also relevant to the UK what we find here , which is when we regulate , we decarbonize and make that a priority those industries which are actually quite regulated in California , they go to Texas , where they're less regulated . They go to China , where they're even less regulated .

So , like one of the things that strikes me and I don't mean it in a negative sense so much when you used to go to Britain you would bring back things made in Britain . The only thing I can think of now is shortbread , which I could buy in the supermarket here .

Speaker 3

But that's one of the things that is increasingly infuriating . Sometimes our own political class will pat us on the back for the amount that we have reduced our emissions over a period of decades .

That's largely because we've just we don't make anything anymore , and increasingly we don't produce our own energy , we don't exploit the fossil fuel reserves that we have here , and that's another thing that Labour have come in saying that no new licences for oil and gas in the North Sea . I think you're absolutely right .

What's interesting to me , though , is that whilst I think maybe in America there's been a slightly more lively debate about some of these green issues for a slightly longer time , in Europe that hasn't really been the case in the same period , but now we're seeing across Europe , and in the UK as well , in the form of the Reform Party , parties and movements and

politicians who are explicitly saying get rid of net zero , who are explicitly saying the European Green Deal is going to destroy our agriculture and we're not going to have any of it . This has actually become an electoral issue and a point of , even in Europe , kind of protests in the streets in a way that we haven't seen at all .

So the kind of ironclad consensus around these environmentalists and net zero issues is really starting to break down in a way that I certainly didn't foresee happening this quickly .

Speaker 2

Well , and you know , the interesting question and we'll see how this comes to into play both in Britain and here is the cancellation policy of anybody who talks negatively about net zero . Right , it is one of those shibboleths that cannot be cannot be spoken poorly about .

Speaker 1

Well , one big difference , of course , is we have the Bill of Rights and you don't . And so so and , by the way , same thing's true in Canada . You know , I mean , Trudeau proposed a law where you could arrest people before they committed a crime .

I mean , I don't think that would make constitutional muster in the United States which I hope not constitutional muster in the United States , which I hope not . Unless AOC got to appoint the Supreme Court , then we might get it . But if we're looking forward , what would be your prognosis for the next few years for the UK after this election ?

And if you could put that in a European context , that would be great .

Speaker 3

Well , I think what we're going to see is this labor government having an incredibly short honeymoon period that's my sense because of all the things we've talked about .

They have not got a resounding democratic mandate , they're also trying to hold together a very kind of shaky coalition , and also the fact that we're in the midst of a load of economic , let alone geopolitical , problems which , um , no one is really convinced that this Labour Party or any of the mainstream parties really have the answers to , and I think that ,

particularly in an environment in which the question of cheap and plentiful energy and the lack of it as it currently stands , has become so core to our debate , that's something which is really going to bite them . So I think , even though this seems like a very stable majority , I think the debate is going to be incredibly unstable .

I think there's going to be a lot of criticisms coming down the pipe from them very quickly , and also , I think we're going to see the sort of disaffection with the mainstream consensus on green issues or cultural issues or whatever express itself sooner rather than later . This reform insurgency proves that that is still there .

It's just kind of lacking a more viable outlet , shall we say , and I think it won't be very long before we start to see that kind of pushback from voters in the way that we have seen across Europe .

I think what often happens is whenever you see one European country have a populist government fall or another European country have a populist government rise depending on who you're talking to , they'll say that that's clear that Europe is turning to the right , or Europe is turning populist , or the populist insurgency is over .

If the inverse is true , I think what's quite clearly happened is , across Europe we now kind of have the two poles of politics are now broadly populist and anti-populist , and just different countries are a different point in that in that cycle .

So even though it does feel like Britain is just unanimously voted in a centre left government , that's really not the case under the surface and I don't think it will be long until they find themselves being battered by some of these headwinds themselves .

Speaker 1

Well , that couldn't do better than that , yeah really , tom .

Speaker 2

Thank you so much for joining us and for your great analysis , and we look forward to seeing how all of this plays out and hopefully you'll be able to come back and be a guest again on the Feudal Future podcast .

Speaker 1

And don't forget to go to spikecom for your best analysis .

Speaker 2

Yeah , you know . Just a quick thing on that For those of you who don't know , Spike , it is a wonderful media outlet that has stories that you will never see anywhere else and provides a tremendous breadth of opinion on all sorts of topics . So kudos to you , Tom , and great job . Thanks so much for having me today .

I've enjoyed it Great and thank you all for joining us on the Feudal Future podcast .

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android
Open in Metacast