Hi, I'm Molly John Fast and this is Fast Politics, where we discussed the top political headlines with some.
Of today's best minds.
And Tucker Carlson is in Moscow hanging out with Vladimir Putin.
We have such a great show for you today.
Daniella Blueiras, the CEO of the New Leadership Project, joins us to talk about how they mobilize business leaders to protect democracy. Then we'll talk to the Washington Posts Areles Hernandez for a boots on the ground report from the Texas Mexico border. But first we have the host of the Enemy's List, the Lincoln Project's own Rick Wilson, who I would like to add will be joining me along
with a few other friends. Get ready at City Winery on March sixth for a general election kickoff live show. You could buy tickets now at City Winery's website and you won't miss it.
And here is Rick Wilson.
Welcome back to Fast Politics, Rick Wilson, it's a Monday, What the fuck man?
Welcome back, my friends to the show that never ends.
Ten thousand days from the general election, right, ten thousand years from the general.
It's rent but for political hell. I think the biggest things out of last week were the fact that there is a number that gags Donald Trump, and I'm happy for that number. I love that number.
Is eighty three million dollars.
Eighty three million dollars.
That's the number where Donald Trump stops to fameing you.
That's the number where even Donald Trump shuts his fucking mouth.
Which is kind of impressive because for Rudy Giuliani, there was no number.
It turned out the number did not exist. He just kept defaming.
Well, it turned out that Rudy Giuliani is going to be eating out of dumpsters at this rate because he didn't even try to make a deal. He didn't even try to conform his behavior.
And now he's in bankruptcy proceedings right.
He's in bankruptcy. Apparently he has about twenty five hundred bucks in the bank according to the filing in my Giuliani alumni network. It is bad, bad, and also awful.
What are they saying.
He's trying to hit anybody he can find up for money. He's desperate.
I mean, I feel like when you owe million dollar judgments like that, and not one million, but multiple.
Million dollar judgments, that's like more than a loane.
How do you wake up in the morning and go, hey, I'm going to call a friend of mine and ask for five or seven million dollars. But the person I talked to said Rudy was like, oh, yeah, I need twenty grand I presume.
In cat Jesus, it's so bad, you.
Know, Look he bought the ticket. He's taken the right. By the way, the other bankrupt enterprise just before you start, is the rn C is flat busted out.
Okay, So that's where I was going with this was money trouble the rn C. Now they're like anemic fundraising. The The problem is, from what I heard from a straight reporter, was that wealthy people are giving a Nicky Haley. Small dollar donors are giving to Donald Trump. No one is giving to the RNC.
Look, the RNC a couple of years ago noticed something. If their email fundraising appeals included the name Donald Trump, they got money. If they did not include the name Donald Trump and they got no money. The problem for them is that Trump is hounding away on these small dollar donors twenty emails a day. I must have your immediate donation, or the deep State wins, you know whatever, the crap is.
The real reason he needs that money is to pay his lawyers.
Yeah, he is not putting this into campaigning. This is going into legal fees. Now. The reason that they are being so shall we say, blunt with every one of the major donor types, is they need a lot of money. They need. I believe the technical term is a metric fuck.
Ton of money. I've heard of the metric book.
Yes, it's a different the imperial fuck ton. It's a totally different thing. Those are freedom units. But long story short, you've got a campaign that is not going to be able to go out there and go head to head with Joe Biden financially on TV. Now, look that matters less than it used to matter.
I think it matters though. You need money to win the presidency.
Yeah, we like money in campaigns. You gotta no bucks, no buck rogers, as they say. But the fundamental underpinning of this is that nothing Trump is doing right now is actually going into campaigning. He presumes that he will outgun Biden on earn media.
Which happened in twenty sixteen, but not in twenty twenty.
That is correct because now Donald Trump is a known quantity and it's much harder now, even for the gentry Republicans to say, oh, well, you know, is it a private meeting with Susie Wiles and she told me Trump's just And then Trump goes out and says, I'm not bullshitting. I want to put you fuckers in camps or whatever it is. Right, So, these major donors are going to finish with Nikki and they're gonna say for about a week and then they're going to all write a check.
It's what they do. Because he's also saying, I will target you if you don't.
Right, all right, I think that we should not wait for these people to have a crisis of conscience because it's not coming.
Oh no, but there was a fire sale on conscience a few years ago, and they're not exactly waking up in the morning and going, my god, what are the implications of me being a complete fucking, amoral shit back. They don't think about that any day ever.
Yeah, exactly.
So let me ask you here we are. We're in this kind of weird period. Nikki Haley. I mean, she's going to be out there, people are giving our money. She's gonna get shellacked in South Carolina. They'll explain to us why.
Well, look, South Carolina makes Ayowa look like a state full of lib tar cuck progressive communist Soro shields. South Carolina is the home of the dirtiest, lowest. And I want you to remember who's saying this to you right now. It's me.
The dirtiest, lowest, nastiest, scummiest, most fucking vicious, mean spirited, amoral, bottom feeding, scum sucking, cat killing scumbag politics in the country.
And I'm from Florida, which taught them how to do it right.
It's like, you know, Darth Vader watching the guy kill all the kids in Star Wars, like, oh easy, woe back there, pal. You know, it's just so crazily over the top. So Nicky's gonna go there. They're doing the Birther bullshit on her already. They're gonna run a brutal campaign. They're gonna say she's an adulteress and a furner and all this other crazy bullshit. And you know what's gonna happen. I'm just gonna win by thirty points or twenty points or whatever. Would I love for her to stay in
through Super Tuesday at least? Sure, great, she could live off the land. She could do it for a few weeks, but I'm I mean, at the end of the day, my brain space now is devoted to how do he beat Donald Trump? Not how can we help Nikky Haley Scooch past the political graveyard.
And you know I've written about this, and I think you've written about this too, which is this fantasy that Donald Trump somehow goes Okay, I'm not the nominee, That's fine, I'll just go away is insane. This man is running to stay out of jail, right, He's not running to be the nominee. He's running for his life, his livelihood, his family business.
There are two men in the world who know that if Trump doesn't win, their lives are absolutely fucked. One is Donald Trump. The other is Vladimir Putin. If Trump wins, Putin lives. If Trump doesn't, Putin dies, literally, he is going to die.
I don't think he's gonna die. That I think is hyperbolic.
No, they'll kill it, yeh no, no, no, no, he's no, he's fine. Now, he's not that fine. Trump needs to win to stay the fuck out of jail. And none of this, none of this works. If Trump loses all the bs falls apart, all the fundraising falls, apart all the ability to get six seven figure donations.
From right, nobody's paying for his lawyers if he's not the nomine.
And what you're going to see, I suspect when he is the nominee is there'll be a process of rapid naturation of the legal side and they will treat it much more seriously. They will not let Trump have another Elena Haba on the stage, because that worked out really well.
Obviously, Yeah she really, I mean, you know, such an interesting thing. You know, he found this lawyer who looked like a young Milania, very beautiful.
Single white female looking Milania.
Right.
Turns out that person not a great lawyer, and you put her against one of the best litigators in this country, a woman you know, argued the defensive marriage doma in front of the Supreme Court, and that really good lawyer eats her for fucking lunch.
Robbie. It was the equivalent of watching like a monster go out and tear the head off of somebody and kick it around like a soccer ball and drink from the spurting blood fountain of the neck. Because this was just.
Tear us out you really think.
I know, you're like, oh damn it, Grandpapa Rixton like terrible stories again.
Grand guy. Yet not yet, but it's true. I mean, that's a great point.
You know, we are here, we are Alena Habba by the way, supposedly, you know, when we had Robbie on the podcast, she was saying how uncomfortable it made her to watch Alena with the judge because she was not respectful with the judge, and that this judge, Caplin is a very strict judge.
Right as we look at this, it's absolutely typical of the sort of broader sense of Trump world and of Maga world today, and that world is contemptuous of expertise. Trump needed, as somebody said, some man or a woman who has spent a lot of time in court who is mental strong enough to say, shut up, Donald, stop doing that. Donald.
That's a Tom Nichols a kind of idea.
It is a Tom Nichols type take. But it's it's not wrong. Trump doesn't have anyone like that. He doesn't have anyone well, I mean he has Susie Wiles, yeah, but Susie's not involved in that part of the operational side. She's just in the campaign. I will say this with all respect, there will become a moment where Trump's ego. Remember there's always a good rule to follow with Trump,
the better he does, the worse he is. And if he starts to pick up again in the polls or anywhere else, he will And because think about it, a lot of his shit behavior from him came right after he started winning in Iowa and New Hampshire. Because of that, he got that I'm invincible thing in his head. Again, He's not invincible. We've seen it now, We've seen Robbie take him to school and end his shenanigans.
You know, he does have more legal problems coming down the pike, like he has a ninety one criminal count.
Yeah. Well look, and again I've said this hundred times. I mean, it will not change a single MAGA vote even if he is in prison.
But doesn't matter. All the magas are not enough.
What matters to me. What I find very satisfactory in this moment is that Donald Trump, even if he never spends a day in jail, he's about to have his entire real estate empire ripped away from him because it's built on a foundation of fraud. He is going to lose all of that that stuffs over, and he is going to spend the rest of his life trying to pretend to be a billionaire and hustle around trying to pretend to be a billionaire when he's not. He's got nothing left and I am here for that.
So let's talk about some just retail politics that I'm not seeing a lot of discussion of. Filing deadlines were this week for a bunch of races Arizona. Looks like Carrie Lake does not have a lot of money. Looks like Kirsten Cinema has even less.
I mean, is this just Reuben goes to.
Have right now? It's rubens to have not. By saying that, I mean to also say, never ever, ever take anything at all.
For granted, especially in Arizona, Especially.
In Arizona, It's bad juju to take anything like that for granted. Don't do it. But the Lake brand, like a lot of other things, trump Ism doesn't scale as well as people think it does.
It almost never does.
If someone came in your house and acted the way Trump does and said the things Trump says, you'd go get the fuck out. You're insane. And if someone acted that way in the workplace, they'd be fired. All these things have added up to this sort of delusion on the part of a lot of these people that they can go out and run and pretend that they're Donald Trump and they're not not one of them.
Is there anyone who you can think of who has done trump Ism and hasn't underperformed at least? I mean, like I'm thinking of like JJB Vans you have a JD vance still ran like about ten points less than he should have considering was Ohio.
That's true, ten is as good as one if you're winning, right, I guess that's true. Or one is as good as ten if you're winning.
But that's like such a red state.
Have you seen anyone else like do trumpsm and make it work for them?
I'm thinking about it right now, and I don't really have another person who is in a competitive seat or state been able to pull that off. Even in congressional districts that are pretty red. There is a limitation of it. So they say the sort of ritualizings of I love Donald Trump, he is the savior in the light of my light in my heart. But they don't act like
Donald Trump. They don't go out and talk about I'm going to be a dictator on day one, and they don't play the Trump character that he plays in every public interaction.
Probably the most maga congressman is mac Gads.
Mac Gates is not a product Matt Gates, right, mac Gates.
R Plus thirty two or whatever the district.
Is, yeah, Florida's first district.
But he's also like Macates is both maga, but he's also like the son of a.
Very prominent Florida politics you know.
Yeh, a former client. Look, and his dad is his dad is worth you know, three hundred million dollars. So Matt has never had a problem in his life. But none of these places or people that would imitate Trump or trump Ism in the real world would survive. It just doesn't work that way. And that's actually that American should take that as a sort.
Of upbeat note, pretty good sign.
You know.
Look, there's always been this this sort of like baseline idea that America finds its way to back sort of a political homeostasis at some point. And the idea that Trump and trump Ism is as unpalatable to Americans as would be like if you took the squad and put them in a moderate Midwestern Democratic district. You know they wouldn't It wouldn't work. But Trump is so far out into the extreme ether it makes even sort of like the most noisy progressives look fairly normal in some ways.
I love you, but compare bearing this squad to Donald Trump is like get bearing Mussolini to the Fendi sisters.
What I said was that if you put the squad in a in a moderate district in anywhere but where they exist, they couldn't survive politically.
It's true, but it is like the construction is comparing the Fendi Sisters to Mussolini. I still love you, though I love you too. Daniella balu Eras is the CEO of the Leadership Now Project.
Welcome to Fast Politics, dan HeLa.
Thanks for having me.
It great to be here, great to have you so talk to us about what your organization is called and what it does.
Sure, my organization is the Leadership Now Project, and we have since twenty seventeen been organizing and mobilizing business leaders who are concerned with protecting American democracy.
And what does that? What does that mean? Like business leaders explain.
It means a couple of things in terms of actual who of who's involved. Since the start, we have had the thesis that there are plenty of members of the business community. I started the organization with fellow alumni from Harvard Business School, but we're worried about the state of democracy. And since then we've expanded across the country, and so we have many our alumni from business schools across the
country of our now leading companies and organizations. Many are gen xers who haven't really been politically engaged until in a significant way, until seeing the really significant threats to democracy after twenty sixteen, and have realized that it's in there the country's interest, in their individual interests and in their business interests to have a functioning system that works.
So what does that look like?
I mean, how it's one thing to say you support democracy, but how do you actually support it?
Yeah, let me give you a couple of examples. So we had members across the country. They are members in their individual capacity. So if you think of organizations historically or that still exists, like the American Bar Association, American Medicalizations Association, organizations that have individual professionals who have a.
Perspective and a position.
Our members are coming to this as individuals, but recognizing their interests, and that can happen in a couple of different ways. We have focused on first, what are systems that can make our democracy function better, So ending jerry managering, increasing voting access, having transparent campaign finance rules, those are
all in that bucket. So we've done things like just last week, our members in Ohio and worked with other business leaders in the state and issued a letter and statement supporting the objective registracting ballot initiative that is expected to be on the ballot in November and making the case. So we had seventy leaders from the former CEO of Procter and Gamble to Jenny Britton, the CEO of where the founder of Jenny's Splendid ice Cream, saying look for
the date. Having fair districts, having state legislatures who are accountable to their citizens, that's good.
For our state.
That's good for attracting talent, and that's good for our business as a whole. And we've been doing in Wisconsin. Our members last year and the year before asked candidates like Governor Evers and Tim Michaels, who ran for governor in twenty twenty two to commit to certifying future elections regardless of the outcome, a pretty basic question. We would hope that every political candidate was willing to commit to that.
But when in that case the Republican candidate for governor refused to do so, our members were very public and saying, we're Democrats, we're Republicans, but we have to vote for democracy, and in this case that means voting for governor evers.
So we're trying to take very specific stances on issues that are very clearly at the core of trust in our system, the functioning of our system, and creating a stable and dynamic democracy that we need for our society to function, for capitalism to function over the long term.
So there was some talk early on after Trump led an armed insurrection that corporations weren't going to donate to him. A lot of them have maybe not donated to him, but donated to you know, they said they weren't going to donate to Republicans who signed to try to overturn the twenty twenty election.
All of that has changed, largely.
Tell me some good news here, because it feels like, in my mind, a lot of corporations have really been quite cowardly and not really stood up for democracy.
So give us like a tiny bit of good news here.
One.
I think it is really important not to think about businesses business leaders as a modelis right if you look at we look at over time, what are the political orientation of MBAs. They're about half half Democrat Republican people. Look at how many say they support democracy, They're pretty moderate on both sides. It's seventy to eighty percent really
are worried about it and concerned. And so the coalition for democracy I think is very large, and it's in all of our interests to make that as large as possible, and business people are part of it.
I think to the specific point of the business.
Response to the interaction and what has happened around supporting election deniers, I think what immediately happened around the election in twenty twenty, and we were very involved in this, that we were the first business organization to come out in October of twenty twenty and say we have to this election is legitimate, our processes are legitimate. We're going
to need to be patient with results. And that had everyone from read Hoffman to mursa mayor, to many others who signed on and through you know, the election debates around waiting for GSA certification, the insurrection, we were really in lockstep with many of the other business groups like the Chamber and Business Roundtable and CEOs coming out and saying, Okay, this is unacceptable, this election is legitimate, and then obviously coming out against the insurrection and then stating that they
would no longer a support election deniers. And you're absolutely right that that commitment has waned. It's not with one hundred percent. I mean about half of those companies have kept commitments. The dollars going from companies to election deniers has reduced, but it has not become a standard right, which is ideally you would like to see a more kind of baseline set of expectations for candidates that corporate packs would support.
So I don't have a great excuse for that.
I think that that is something that we were encouraging companies to really take a real look at in twenty twenty four as they make their decisions and the.
Risk that that creates.
But I do think it's important to recognize that the way companies and business leaders are engaged in the system is not just about you know one hundred and forty seven members of Congress and the twenty five hundred dollars checks that you know, a relatively limited set of companies in the big scheme of things. Right, it comes down to, I mean, what we know in this election, right. I mean, you're talking to people on this podcast every day about it is.
It's going to come.
Down to the conduct and mobilization in six states. You know, I was recently in Arizona. Eighty percent of the election administrators have quit. Yeah, there's intimidation all over the place, including of the particularly of the Republican election administrators, right, and business leaders standing up for those election administrators, helping fill the gap, and poll workers encouraging going out to vote publicly, standing against election deniers in this their state,
which is what our Wisconsin business leaders did. I mean, that's even bolder from my perspective than a company deciding not to write a twenty five hundred dollars check.
Is that happening?
Yeah?
And I mean that you know, as I mentioned, our members in Wisconsin and the Wisconsin Business Leaders for Democracy when they did this question neire to candidates to the governor givenatorial candidates and said will use sort of five future elections. They came out publicly, they endorsed Evers because he was supporting democracy.
They shot an.
Ad, It was viewed ten million times, It was covered all over the press, and it was a clear statement to voters and too many moderate voters that you know, this was an election that was first and formed about for our institutions and I think for business. You know, I've been disappointed by the narrative coming out of Davos.
Why don't you tell our listeners for those who are not completely tuned in what the narrative, the incredibly ridiculous narrative coming out of Davos.
Was, which I will say, I will attribute to a combination of the chat or the ara to Davos, and I think they're kind of overestimating how much there's a singular narrative. So I think the press is weaved it into like one narrative that everyone in Davos kind of
was taking. All of that said, I mean, there were clearly data points that the press had to work with around business leaders, including Jamie Diamond, suggest thing at a minimum, they were willing to work with whoever would win and it wouldn't really affect the us that much, and maybe even that would be you know, net positive.
Right.
There might be a tax cut, which is insane, right, but yes, I'll be in Gitmo, so I won't get to see the tax cut. But yes, that's the idea.
I'm on the stand. It's you are.
It is this idea that corporate I mean, corporations are now people.
They are corporations serving their corporate interest.
Right, right.
But the people who made comments in Davos are people, right.
Those business leaders are.
Made out of comments that they have, from my perspective, a fear billit of latitude and how they frame this issue.
And so I think the.
The failure in that framing is that this election, first and foremost is about of law and institutions and about not what exactly what economic policy decision is.
Going to be made in the first month or year, et cetera.
Although I think there are many ways that Trump will be bad for trade, will be bad for many industries.
Well, the sixty percent tariff seems like it might be inflationary. Trump has been mulling private lily to advisors a sixty percent tariff on Chinese goods.
Yes, I mean there is all kinds of both bluster and like real policies that could be taken that would be bad economically. But I think this most important argument here is the question is will you be ever able to influence policy again, whether you.
Like the next policy or not.
Are we going to be at the end of real democracy in this country where institutions and policies are debated and fought out in different interests. You know, we might not love exactly which interests have more influenced or not, but ultimately, even in its imperfection, our system is about
rule of law, a set of representation of people. And what's at stake here is really the entire system itself, and that not only has real domestic you know, I think the application for business, of course, are also things like political retribution. We did an amicust brief. What are the other things we do in addition to, you know, taking positions on ballot initiatives or on expectations of political leaders?
Is amicus briefs on things like the Morvey Harper Independent State, Independent State Legislature case, which was a case in twenty twenty three that sought to just give state legislatures free reign over elections, which failed, fortunately in the Supreme Court, but we submitted an amarchist saying this kind of lack of rule of law and uncertainty would be bad for business.
And we also did an amicist brief.
Which seems pretty obvious, but a lot of Republicans don't believe that, which is bizarre, continue to say.
Yeah, yeah, well yeah.
And this is another place where the framing does not make sense of removing constitutional checks and balances the system, which again are the like four of democracy rate and protects everyone, I mean.
Including business.
And we didn't amachus brief on Disney's case against Governor DeSantis on you know, free speech grounds and also you know, the lack of constitutionality of political retribution against a company for them exercising free speech as Disney did in the case in Florida on LGBT rights, and that I think the scale of behind the scenes political retribution or threats of political retribution and then the public examples like Disney are very significant.
I mean, we hear about it all the time, and it's at it's at the state level.
It's threatening a company if you say anything we don't like, here's the three things we're going to do on your regulation on the regulatory side to a degree. I mean, you know, you could argue politics has never exactly been the most clean of political systems anywhere, but it has
gone up dramatically in the last eight years. And the idea that you can just kind of hide from that or that intervention in your business is something that won't happen, or you can just you know, you can stop using the term ESG and start saying sustainability and then they'll go away. Unfortunately, history tells us that that is not the case. I mean, we work with business leaders from Hungary, from Turkey, from Mexico. They've all seen, as they've experienced
that democracy eroded. The political leadership is willing to completely go after them, go after them personally, go after their businesses, make it impossible for them to operate. I mean, you see in Hong Kong the number of business leaders that have been thrown in jail. Go back to Pazi Germany. You know, it really is unfortunately, very naive. What we know is that business leaders over history are often naive
that they can kind of work with the autocrat. Unfortunately, you know, they'll just kind of not take them on, and that never ends well at all.
Exactly what can our listeners do to support your organization and also just to support democracy as all.
Absolutely, And I mean I think one just one other comment on Davos and the commentary there and this commentary that business has come to terms with Trump. I really think that is not helpful because business and business leaders, whether it's the Fortune five hundred or at a state level across different industries, is just are just not monolithic.
And there of business leaders and plenty of power that we have in this country, whether it's in business or in civil society, who does not want to see the erosion of rule of law. And that's not purely defined by democrat versus Republican. And lots of people don't even like to think of themselves first, second, or third as partisan, right.
They think of themselves as a business person, They think of themselves as a mom, They think of you know, all all of those things that I am, you know, I think about and I'm a New Yorker like all of those identities. There's no readings, and we shouldn't be, you know, thinking about them broadly. And I really do think we have many examples in recent years of business people and business leaders taking a position.
Here and there's no reason we can't do more.
And I think one of the you know, lessons from I find Tim Snyder's work The Yell Historians so instructive and his on iranny, you know, his twenty steps of how to kind of resist autocracy. The first one is don't obey in advance if there's bluster around you know, oh, we're scared.
That Donald tweet.
Donald Trump might tweet against us, or there might be you know, threats of retaliatory regulation, et cetera. What autocrats depend on is you taking action before they even do anything. So I think that kind of reminder to everyone, like, you know, don't change the way you're operating in your business or in life just because you're fear of what might happen later, because that increases the chance that happens later.
And I think the other thing is, which is relevant to business or to engaging any civic group, right, is that like small actions and small groups of people do have a lot of power. So even you know what we've seen, if even a dozen executives in the city come together and say, how are we going to protect be part of protecting election administrators in this state?
What are we going to do publicly.
How do we work with other civic groups, How do we make it unacceptable for threats? For election administrators that can have a lot of power, you don't need to have, like you know, all the leaders in your state or city involved, you can you can move, which I think is going to be so important in the next nine months. And then I you know, I think a basic thing that any leader of an organization can do also is give time out for voting, you know, make sure that everyone's aware of all.
Of the ways to engage.
We have such a desperate need for poll workers, for instance, because so many are quittings. So I think just supporting that engagement, et cetera. I'll say one last thing on the point of what can people do? Mali, I see that we both grew up in New York.
I was in Brooklyn mostly before Brooklyn was cool, maybe a gritty cool.
I was reflecting on how the former president was so present in the press and around the time that you and I were both young, and you would have lots of Donalds in and Evada press and publicity, and how that seemed kind of farcical at the time, and how it seems anything but that now, but I do think New Yorkers I feel an extra obligation to be part of addressing these threats to democracy since it's kind of a.
Home we created him. Yes, yes, thank you so much, Daniella.
That was great, great to connect.
Arelis Hernandez is a correspondent for The Washington Post.
Welcome to Fast Politics at our alis.
Happy to be here. Thank you.
He wrote this incredible piece on the border.
I am so conflicted because I want to cover the border because there's a humanitarian crisis going on there. But it feels to me that the way it's being covered as a political crisis when in fact it's really a humanitarian crisis.
What is it like so right now, actually, crossings have plummeted. I'm actually an Eagle Pass right now, and you know there's some activity down the river, but right now there's sort of in a stasis. I can describe to you Shelby Park for example, of this riverfront park here in Eagle Pass, it has quite a bit of sort of
military personnel there. There are raes or wire shipping containers, and they're continuing to sort of place more and more stuff as a barrier as a deterrent to migrants, and so what we have been hearing from local officials and particularly law enforcement and fire rescue folks here at Eagle Pass is that because migrants are seeing that this path that was once available that I'm to cross the river is longer available, they're going upriver and downriver, where in
some cases the water is more swift, it's deeper, and it's a bit more dangerous across.
One of the things you what about in this pieces, you talked about how you know there are soldiers there. There's a whole sort of security industrial complex booming in the town of Eagle Pass.
Right, Yes, I mean on normal date is right when you don't have the State of Texas and the National Guard occupying a city municipal park, there is tons of federal law enforcement and border control that are here regularly controlling.
The reason that we think that crossing xanthropped off in the new year has to do in part with some of the work that's happening in Mexico, with our diplomats and some of our congressional leaders negotiating with Mexico to have the National Police over there be also more aggressive
in stopping groups from reaching northern Mexico. In this case, this is called Quawia States, which is the sister city to Eagle Pass, and there they've been more successful in, for example, taking migrantsoft buses, stopping them from boarding flights to the border, intercepting caravans and sending them back south
to Tabatula or to the Guatemala Mexico border. And so you know, the US has been in this holding pattern of sorts where the numbers sort of fluctuate, in part depending on how much interest Mexico has in stopping those groups from even reaching the border.
Right, I want you to talk about.
Because one of the things that was so moved with your piece was about how this is really a dangerous cross.
I mean, people die doing.
This all the time. In fact, I was with a shared deputy yesterday and we were talking through His job for a long time was just to respond to the remains of migrants dubbed floaters, because if you drown in the river, it takes a couple of days for your body to inflate and float up to the surface of the river. He handled two hundred and twenty five bodies
in twenty twenty two alone. There are different groups that have different numbers than metic Balok x Amner's officer, the Justice of the Peace, Board of Patrol has different numbers, but we're talking about hundreds of people, men, women and children, and in some cases women who are pregnant, you know, good and distressing the river and then give burst his stillborn children. On the US side. It's a massive tragedy.
So one of the things you read about in this piece is the town of Eagle Pass. The people around there have a lot of mixed feelings about immigration and these people coming over the border.
Yeah, so Eagle Pass is technically part of Tony gonzalezis a Republican his district. This is a place where people are mostly voting Democrat, but are very conservative or at least extremely moderate, and they're facing this in different ways. For example, if you're a local firefighter, you're experiencing the trauma of having to respond to migrant rescues all the time.
If you're someone who needs the here to the hospital in Eagle Past, you're having to wait some time because a lagrant might be occupying that bed that you need. If you're a shared's deputy who is experienced, like, there
are different layers to this. So people I think are for the most part, are largely sympathetic to the fact that people are making this choice to joiney northward and to seek asylum, but are angry about the resources and more than anything, I think the sort of inaction of both the state and the federal government in providing actual solutions to the problem. Right.
And that's I.
Think a really important point here, because Biden had asked for all this border money and Republicans had said no, And then there was a border bill which nobody's seen but is probably not going to make anyone happy. Until you have legislation, Biden can't really executive order his way out of those as much as Republicans pretend to want
him to. So, like, these people who live in this community, are they feel that they're not I mean, they don't just feel it, It's really true that they're not able Like the part of in the piece you wrote about how like, you know, people who have a heart attack can't get an ambulance because they're trying to save someone who's drowning in the river, right.
Right exactly. I mean they're literally in the middle in every single way and dimension of this particular humanitarian issue. And you know, folks are trying to sort of figure out a way that they can be a part of the conversation, whether at the state or the federal level. I mean, if you ask regular folks in egal past, they won't blame the governor for stepping in the way
he has. They don't think it's effective or will solve the problem, but they sympathize with that frustration that like, here you have thousands of people every day, like at some point it was like five thousand people every day
crossing the river into your community. And while you know, in sort of direct everyday way, you're not interacting or having encounters with micro depending on where you live within the rural or in the city, but you are feeling sort of like the residual effects of all of that.
Right exactly.
And it's complicated because a lot of these people are new immigrants.
Right, And I mean you've got all kinds of different sort of family dynamics in the borderlands. In some cases, there are folks who've been here since you know, Spanish were here in this region and this was still Mexico. And then you have people who, yeah, who are one or two generations removed from having migrated themselves or their families are still on the other side in Piados Negadas who are in mixed status families, so again like they
understand and they sympathize. There is a little bit of sort of quiet resentment, particularly on Mexicans who migrated to the United States work in Eagle Pasts and are trying to bring their families across because there's a perception that, right, and they've spent money, they spent years trying to bring their wife or their child across the Eagle Past, and here are thousands of people seemingly getting a free pass and access to resources to be able to move about
the country. There is some resentment that exists, but it's more a resentment I think good.
Right.
My perception is with the government sort of not being able to manage this in a way that makes sense.
Right, what happens to people when they come over? How does it go?
So there is no straight script for what happens to a person when they cross the river step on US soil. Maybe as for asylums or coming to relief and going to border patrol custing, there are a couple of things that can happen, and it all depends on what country you come from who you are, like male or female child,
they're coming as a family, and how you crossed. And so for example, for those Venezula migrants, that couple that I met, the twenty five and twenty one year old, they were clearly asking for protection at asylum for political persecution in Venezuela. In that case, had this been sort of a normal border patrol interaction, those folks would have
been taken into custody. If they ask for asylum verbally, they would have had a conversation with an asylum officer and screened for credible seer and then would have moved on the process. Depending on sort of the discretion of the various officers involved in that process, they could have been released on parole into the United States place and detention, possibly even deported because we do we are doing deportation
flights to Venezuela. And it's no secret to anyone here that of you know, the thousands of people who pastor assylament entered that process, a large number of them, as the laws written out, probably won't qualify for asylum in this country.
I feel like the politics of this have gotten so removed from the actual experience of people can you talk a little bit about what these people have done by the time they gotten to Ego Pass, like what their trip looks like.
Yes, I can give you sort of what the stereotypical and again it really varies from migrant to migrant, depending on a nationality and their economic resources. Frankly, but in recent years a lot of migration has been coming through South America, particularly Venescuela, in some cases Cuba and Nicaragua.
These are all places that we don't have diplomatic relations with and that are you know, run by socialists or governments or autocracies, right, and these folks do in some cases across the Darien Jungle, which is links Columbia to Panama to get onto the Isthmus and the continent, they're crossing eight or nine national borders along the way. They're facing all kinds of dangerous situations, extortion rights, you know,
vulnerability to criminal organizations. In some cases they are getting help, like they've had relatives who've made that journey and are you know, have basically mapped it out for them, told them which bus is to take, or jumping on top of trains. It's such a constellation of experiences that you can have, but all of it, none of it is is easy.
There are people coming from places also that you would not expect, right, Can you talk about that?
Yes, I've talked to particularly folks who run in geos in this sector of the border that have seen folks from Vietnam, from Senegal, from Marisha, from Syria in some cases, or Russians. You know, people have gotten the message and you know, cartails and criminal organizations have will We've spread that message that if you are seeking this kind of protection or you just want to make the trip to the USA, this is the way to go.
This is a people problem more than it is a stuff problem.
Right, I think so, right, Yeah, yeah.
I mean I'm just saying, like the fentanyl is not flowing over this border, right, These people don't have anything with them, is what I'm.
Trying to get to.
Oh, yeah, this is this is a human smuggling, human exploitation, and human migration situation.
Yeah.
That there's folks that who are bringing drugs, absolutely, but they're for the most part, they're not amongst the surrenderers.
Right.
The large majority of people that you see in images.
And the people who are bringing drugs are probably coming through ports.
Of entry, yes, and in vehicles and people who work for organizations and not how to do this work.
Yes, right, So if you were a good faith actor, which I'm not sure Republicans are, you are seeing firsthand what the issues are.
In your mind. I know this is like kind of.
Unfair as you're straight journalist, but like, what are your sense of how if you were.
The president you would solve this problem. I'm sorry to ask you this question.
But I'm just curious if you have solves that you've seen because you're.
There, I'm going to sort of relay what folks who live here has been trying to advance for a long time. There are a bunch of influential business people and political years out here who have advanced some of these solutions have gotten nowhere the conversation in Congress. So we're talking about specifically aligning migration to labor needs in the United States.
We're talking about creating many ellis islands where you have civilian people who are in charge of specifically processing folks at the borer seeing asylum and making a very clear pathway for them to be able to do that so
they don't have to cross the river. That there's like a special line for them at the bridge, and that there's a processing center for them to be able to do that, and to increase the number of immigration judges and asylum officers that are reviewing these cases so you don't have these bag backlogs and rating waiting two to
three years. I mean it. The availability of legal pathways has diminished over the decades for folks, and you know, the asylum seemed to be that pathway as sylolon does need to change, probably at least that's what borderlanders are saying, because again the realities don't match what experiences that people are bringing. And spinning that forward into sort of a
question of demographic labor and economics. The United States is aging quite rapidly and baby boomers are coming out of the workforce, in which case you're going to need people to fill those jobs. You're going to need people to for those industries. So I think there are practical solutions that again borderlanders advance and if you want, there is a common sense playbook that the International Bank of Commerce that just situated in the borderlands. Dennis Nixon is the president.
He has tried to push this forever and again has not made an intraction.
Yeah, so you're basically saying that a better funded federal government would be able to handle this crisis, and in fact, it may have been created by a Republican party that wants the federal government to fail.
You don't have to agree with that.
Yeah, yeah, I mean there's a debate or in that space about that.
But yes, I mean it seems like the government, if it had enough money to address this problem, could solve it or at least make it better.
I think there is some sense of that. Maybe it isn't a question of more money, but more targeted and efficient use of that money towards the kinds of commons and solution bringing ideas that borderlanders again have advanced for years.
Yeah, now that these numbers are down a little bit, do you think that why the numbers are down are because Mexico is sort of doing more remain in Mexico stuff.
Remain in Mexico is a totally different sort of paradigm, but in terms of they are doing more enforcement, they are keeping migrants from getting to the river or the desert line. So like you know, they're not in some cases not issuing tickets to ride buses that would be headed Norris or they're pulling off them off with trains, those kind of enforcement actions.
So that is why it's happening.
It's part of the reason.
Yes, right.
Do you think that if there were really a clear path to citizenship that that would slow these illegal crossings.
That's a great question. Part of the issue is that you're combating a criminal international criminal organizations that are incredibly sophisticated and have been known to adapt very quickly to whatever the problems of changes of the border are, and they'll figure out how to make money. But I think if you make it safer, if you make it clearer, if there are clear expectations for what happens when I enter this process, then you know, you could potentially create
a scenario where people bypass those criminal organizations altogether. Now that's also you know, idealistic and futuristic, and I don't know what's actually going to happen, but that's okay.
We need to be idealistic, especially when it comes to we have this tight labor market. We have this you know, we are not keeping up growing our population. This is my opinion now, and I'm on the opinion space, so I can say this, these are people we need in this country.
It's just a question of how to be able to get them here.
And to be clear, like I mean, they're not thinking that all of these folks are exactly what the United States needs. I think there is very much from business leaders at least, this sense that we should match the skills that some of these folks, if they have, you know, special skills to the labor needs in the United States.
It's like the idea of a guest worker program, for example, is something that is still pretty popular amongst I think a lot of different sectors of folks who live here on the border.
Thank you so much, Arellis for taking the time with us.
It's my pleasure happy to shed light on some of this stuff.
In a moment, and so so let me ask you, do you have a moment of fuckery, Rick Wilson.
My moment of fuckery is every one of these assholes in MAGA universe who are still ship talking and down talking the American economy because at this point they can't deny that Joe Biden's economy is so good and so strong and growing stronger by the day. We've got record wage growth for the first time in fifty five years, we've got record job growth, we've got record energy production. Prices are coming down faster than they went up. We've got gas prices under three bucks a gallon everywhere in
the country except California. Now we've got an amazing economy. And these people that continue, like on Fox, they are like some say, they'll wait to see if these numbers are adjusted later. Walking past that graveyard is not working out as well as y'all think.
So and men, that was an incredible yeah.
Wasn't it. So that's my moment of fucker. He is all these people down talking the American economy right now, when, by god, you know, at some point just some basic reality check on these people. I know how too much it irritates them. But here we are.
It is so insane to me that you know, look, it's exactly what Trump said. He wants the economy to creator, he wants there to be a recession. He doesn't want to be Herbert Hoover, right, remember that.
Ah, yeah, he knows what's going on.
Well, he sort of knows what's going on.
Well, no, but he does see that there's a very difficult case to be made to pretend that the economy is somehow this dark and perilous place. Now, it's really hard to do that now.
And so he's going to prevent legislation for the border in the hopes that that will provide him enough to make a theory of the case that that will give him something to run it. Because right now the economy is good, inflation is going down. There are so many sort of wins in this Biden economy political at this morning, which I am going to just read you a tiny bit of because it's such an incredible little thing that
I completely missed. It's called thirty things that Joe Biden did as president, which you might have missed, and they include expanding overtime guarantees for millions. First over, the counter birth control pill to hit US stores in twenty twenty four, which means that people who can't afford doctors, which is a large percentage.
Of American women.
Oh yeah, sad, we.
Can get birth control, gun violence prevention, and gun safety get a boost.
I know that's something near and dear to your heart.
Renewable power is the number two source of electricity in the United States, and climbing. Did you know that I did not know that? I did know that preventing discriminatory mortgage lending.
He did that.
He sweeping cracked down on junk fees and overdraft charges, forcing Chinese companies to open their books. I me in preventing another January sixth. I mean my man building armies of drones to counter China that I have mixed feelings about the drones. Nations, farms, get big bucks to go climb.
It's smart. I mean. Biden scrabs Trump's paint scheme for Air Force one.
Here's the thing. The economy that Donald Trump fantasizes about in his head is Joe Biden's economy. The economy donald Trump pretended he was delivering for America is actually the economy Joe Biden has built. And all the Trump stuff was always a Potemkin village. It was always a sort of illusion to make his own himself happy. It was always sort of like, you know, maga porn, and Biden's delivered. So people that criticize that, they are in my moment
of the fuckery. Thank you, Rick, good night, good day, and all that.
That's it for this episode of Fast Politics. Tune in every Monday, Wednesday and Friday to hear the best minds in politics makes sense of all this chaos. If you toward what you've heard, please send it to a friend and keep the conversation going. And again thanks for listening.