Would You Rather?-- Teammates Edition - podcast episode cover

Would You Rather?-- Teammates Edition

Jun 05, 202033 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Nick Chubb in round 2 or Kareem Hunt in round 5? We deliberate teammates at the same position to determine who provides better value when factoring in their average draft position. 

Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Speaker 1

Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio. Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio, your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy football advice, speculation, and whatever stupid stuff they decided to drop into the show. Now here's your host, Paul. Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly. I am Paul Chargey in My co host this week is Bryan Johnson. What's up. Good to talk to you again.

And this week's we're playing a game. You know a lot of times you're just grinding up a bunch of news and you know, all the latest stuff, and here's what's happening to the draft of free agency. This is our would you rather game. We've done this from time to time over the course of the Fantasy Football Weekly regular season show. I'm gonna give you the average draft position of two teammates, and I want you to choose

one or the other. Factoring in the average draft position, you know, it's obvious which guy you'd rather have if one of the other. But if you've got to pay the price for one, who would you rather have? Let's do it. We've got nine teammates to evaluate. The game never gets old, by the way, but it stands the test of time, and there's some good ones. Indeed it does. We begin in Buffalo. Would you and the running backs?

Would you rather have Devin Singletary right now going off with an average draft position of the fourth round, or rookie running back Zack Moss with an average draft position of the round. Devin Singletary was very good at the end of last year. Zack Moss a bit of an unknown. What do you think? Yeah, that's quite the disparity in rounds, that are right. So I went right to your favorite spot charts inside the five yard line for this one.

And uh, Devin Singletary a very exciting running back, but kind of more of a scatback, certainly not a power back. And us by his three carries inside the ten yard line last year. I know he said inside the five, but this is inside the ten obviously twice as far out is it? Five? Only ten carries or I'm sorry, only three carries inside the ten. Frank Gore had eighteen, Josh Allen had eleven. Yeah, Josh Allen nearly quadrupled these

carries inside the ten yard line. So right there, Zack Moss, rookie at Utah been heralded as a five tool running back, meaning he can run through you, run around you, just run right by you, avoid you entirely. If you wants pass protect, pass block, He's gonna absorb all of these red zone carries that Frank Gore once occupied. So for me, it's with the bullet Zack Moss easily in round fifteen. I'm with you, it's Zack Moss. And I like Devin Singletary. He was a good player and in PPR league still

have value. But Zack Moss is almost free in round fifteen. And you hit on a lot of the key points and you you got all my inside the five stuff. I was. I was surprised to learn David single Tory seven. Singletary scored one touchdown from inside the five last year. He's got to score from distance. And you know we've seen over the years the players who have to score from distance. They put up some years they have a

three touchdown year. I mean, they just have clunkers where it just doesn't work out that they score from distance. The easy touchdowns that just that make a player transcended are the ones that come from inside the five. And Devin Singletary isn't going to get those. And you mentioned, you know, Zack Moss is a big bodied guy built for goal line, and they drafted him specifically to be that tough yards inside guy. He welcomes contact, he breaks tackles,

He's a finisher. Utah's all time leading rusher and all time rushing touchdown leader, Zack Moss. He is the correct answer. I believe, we both believe Zack Moss. Two votes for Zack. He's been playing at higher elevation. That's Buffalo is at sea level. By the way, Buffalo or at least Lake Love. How exciting is Buffalo looking on paper like this is the first time the early nineties. Yeah, man, they got

a fun looking team. But yeah, people are gonna start to get more sharp to this where I think Zach Moss could surpass Devin Singletary and a DP come late August. Maybe no chance Za here to make an eleven rounds now he pops off, and we're praying that there's preseason games for once. We're praying for preseason games, right, but what if he pops off anyway, that's a chance not happen, all right? The next would you Rather Teammate? Edition? Would you rather have? A Marie Cooper in round three or

seed Lamb rookie wide receiver in round nine. Obviously these are Dallas wide receivers of Marie Cooper round three or Seedee Lamb at round nine. Can I say Michael Gallup, No, I know not right now, A MARII Cooper, it's a value. He's valid for this. But it's the same old story with a Mari Cooper. It's it. It really hasn't changed since the trade to the Cowboys from the Raiders, where he's been this roller coaster ride of emotion last year.

Four games over a hundred yards for Cooper, four under twenty five yards, that he is not reliable in a in in a scenario where you have to choose your starters and if it's not best ball I did I found. I came to the same analysis Dallas and in justice. Dallas games are just thrown out at the Raiders games because a lot of people like r fort of his games. That was a lot. He had forty eight scoreless yards or less in of his Dallas games for Marie Cooper.

Those are games that kill you. And that's just too high of a clunker ratio for a Marie Cooper to pay in the third round. Yeah, and then you bring in Ceedee Lamb, who we were in agreement a couple of months ago, the top wide receiver in this year's draft, and Michael Gallops already there. You got it up and coming, Blake Darwin uh And of course Zeke Tony Pollard is an astounding football player pass catcher. So I'm just taking the cheaper guy here. I'm not going Cooper. There's no

chance I'd rather take Ceedee Lamb all day. Ce Lamb was my number one rookie wide receiver going into the draft, as you mentioned, absolutely electric after the catch, twenty six broken tackles last year, number two in the n c A among all wide receivers, forced a miss tackle on over of his catches. It's insane. The best receiver in Dallas never dropped. Seed Lamb never dropped a pass of twenty plus yards in his three seasons at Oklahoma either. And he was the best yard after after catch guy

in this draft. So elusive, so electric after the catch, Ceedee Lamb by a mile. I still cannot believe Dallas got him. I cannot put we can either, Denver and Well, I was gonna say Oakland, Las Vegas passed for rugs and find players and they're probably gonna have good, nice careers. But I think Ceedee Lambs the best player in this draft. Definitely.

All Right, Our third would you rather teammate ad a ship goes to Denver Melvin Gordon with his round three average draft position, or Philip Lindsay going off in round eight? Which would you rather have? This is probably one of

the tougher ones we're gonna go through today. Um. For those who don't remember, Gordon held out with the charges last year for the first three four games I think four, um, But he ended up with the fifth most carries inside the five yard line with thirteen, and his fifteen yards inside the five was the third most on those thirteen carries. And uh, Gordon scored as many touchdowns inside the five as se Kwon Barkley, Nick Chubb and Levian Bell combined

last season, missing the first quarter of the year. Now, now, Lindsay was no slouch inside the five either, eight carries for fourteen yards and five touchdowns. That is Exuberg averaging two yards for carry. We're gonna get some really horrible inside to five numbers a little later. Some other teams, But I mean Lindsay Lindsay and dreaming at the same number of carries inside the ten last year for Denver.

Of course Freeman Roy Streaman that is is an afterthought now, but Lindsay had twice as many inside the five as Freeman. So really this work, who who's gonna get it is gonna be right down the middle. It seems I'm very much on the fence. So I'm just gonna shut up now and take the cheaper guy again and say, Philip Lindsay, We've both been on the cheaper guy in every one of these scenarios, and I'm taking Philip Lindsay here, but I'm gonna go for a little different direction than you did.

Is Melvin Gordon even that good? Debatable? It is? Pro Football Focus ranked him eighty five in yards after contact eight five. I mean that's to take You're basically talking about not just second string running backs on thirty two teams. You're talking about the third string running the third best running backs and thirty two teams to get all the way to eighty fifth and yards after contact next to him at ranking eighty five, where guys like Frank Gore,

when Dell Smallwood, David Montgomery, fullback Sea j Ham. These are the guys that have yards after contact equivalent to Melvin Gordon. He's been three point nine yards per carry or less in every season, but one three point nine or less last year. Three point eight. Austin Ekeler, running behind the same exact line as Melvin Gordon, has averaged five and a half yards per carry, five point two yards per carry, and four point two yards per carry

over the last three seasons. I mean it's you know, Austin Neckla has got all the same disadvantages of the same offense, same offensive line, and he's popping off in an extra yard and a half yard yard and a half per carry. So I don't know that Melvin Gordon honestly is even that good anymore. And I'll never forgive him, even though it's not entirely his fault. Of course, Melvin Gordon, that is, for not scoring a touchdown, one single touchdown

in his rookie year. This is statistical ottity. And then of course the next year was like a season, and you know everybody got him at a cheap price. We'll take a break when we come back. Three more would you rathers? Including some high profile players on the Cleveland Browns. Welcome back to Fantasy Football Weekly, Paul Charge and Brian Johnson with you high profile players on the Cleveland Browns. Who would you rather have? This is our teammates edition

of would you Rather Go? To Cleveland? It could go a couple of directions. In Cleveland, We're going to the wide receivers. Odell Beckham has got an average draft position of round three. Jarvis Landry has an average draft position of the end of round five. Who would you rather take? Factoring in the average draft position? Brian Johnson, where were we a year ago? Just how excited about this Cleveland

Browns offense team? In general? Everybody, everybody wanted a piece of the Browns and it turned out there was one for two really good player to get and that was Nick Chubb or maybe Cream Hunt later. Yeah, but uh yeah, Odell Beckham clearly a Bust of the Year candidate last season. I'd probably give it to someone like Juju Smith Schuster over Beckham. Beckham still David Dust from last year. Yeah, he had a good first half though, but uh, Juju

throughout was just painful. But anyway back to Beckham and Landry, Uh yeah, Beckham, like you said, going mid round three right now, some leekus. He was going through it overall last year, so that's quite a discount on his side. But at this time last year I had Odell Beckham as my number one wide receiver. Over the course of the preseason, I had lowered him down to like number four. Still an epic with yeah, I'm he he scares me. Still,

I think we've seen pique Odell Beckham. I know Eli Manning is not the ideal quarterback for a stud wide receiver, but back in those days, Beckham was the guy and that was it. And Beckham's not the guy here. And what scares me most about Beckham is last year sixty sorry I'm looking this up real quick, sixty three of his games he fell outside the top thirty wide receivers.

Odell Beckham, Odell Beckham. Jarvis Landry, on the other hand, finished top five in PPR formats last year in the second half of the season after a slow start where they're probably just forest feeding Odell Beckham the ball soda. Long story short, it's uh Landry is a safer play. Beckham's a ceiling pick in the mid third, and there are guys like Kenny Golladay, and honestly, I would rather take Calvin Ridley two rounds ahead where he's going than

over a guy like Odell Beckham. He just doesn't excite me like he used to. So I'm going discount again with Landry. I'm taking This is the first time we differ. I'm taking Odell Beckham. We know what Jarvis Landry is all about. If you want a wide receiver with four five touchdowns, Jarvis Landry is your man. That is your guy. You want eighty catches, one thousand yards and no touchdowns, that's your guy. He brings no upside to the table.

Odell Beckham brings double digit touchdown upside sometimes something he's done three years he's had double digit touchdowns. And I really believe this is the year we thought we were going to get last year from the Browns offense. Kevin Stefanski is a proven good coach, not long track record, but he just got Kirk Cousins the best year of his career. He fed both two different wide receivers from Minnesota. Both Stephan Diggs and Adam Felan both got fed. Both

of these guys can get fed here. I really do believe Beckham is going to rebound nicely. Here. You get him in round three when he was going off the board in round one and early round two last year. I can get him at double the number of picks his technical his average draft positions actually thirty to be more specific, he was going off the board at roughly fifteen or less last year. So I'm taking the discount that's built into Odell Beckham coming off a down but

not terrible season. Um, by the way, he had a thousand year. Odell Beckham had a thousand yards last year. I mean it was not a total bust season for Odell Buckham as you positioned it. I don't believe I'm not gonna die on the Jarvis Landry Hill. I can. I can't contest it too much. Next we go to Green Bay and we're back to the running back position. Which of these teammates would you rather have Aaron Jones paying a second round price for him or A J.

Dillon the rookie running back in round fifteen? So Aaron Jones speaking of a roller coaster ride, he certainly was one last year. Party mom looking up some numbers here. So Jones finished basically as the second running back in PPR formats Uh certainly was boosted up by some monster games. The one versus Dallas comes to mind. Four touchdowns, I think four touchdowns like two fifty combo yards something like that. But when when he when he hits the floor, he

hits it hard. And last year he had thirty overt of his games fell outside the top thirty at his position. And for comparison's sake, you have you got guys like Christian McCaffrey, Dalvin Cook. They're under ten falling outside of the top thirty. Yeah, I mean even like Derrick Henry seven percent, Austin Ekeler of your games outside the top thirty is a lot that when you're paying Yeah, And I don't know what what what A J. Dillon's gonna

do in his rookie year. I don't know what any rookies are gonna do this year, to be honest with you, with no mini camps, we don't have to get into that now. But I'm still not drafting Aaron Jones at this price tag. You couldn't pay me to take Aaron Jones because he certainly could win you your league if everything falls place for him, But odds always gonna lose it for you because it's he's two up and down for me for going in the first second round too risky.

Last year, Jones saw a two to one ratio of carries over Jamal Williams, and so really, a J. Dillon he's gonna get some carries this year. They drafted him in the second round and the front office took all kinds of heat for the pick. They're gonna want to validate that pick by getting A J. Dillon at least some run this year. So let me ask you this, Brian. Does A J. Dillon's carries come out of Aaron Jones

or Jamal Williams or can we not know? I don't think you can really know, but if I had to pick one, it seems like you would be Aaron Jones car not Jamal Williams. And it's like they're just gonna relegate Williams to this third third down rule because Williams is never in. You know, he was an average ball carrier, right, He's more of a receiving back pass protector. So it seems like the touches when it comes to rushes will

come from Aaron Jones and not Williams. So yeah, I'm I'm a J Dillon over Jones all day, if I gotta pick one. Jones and Williams are free agents next year, and so you know, there could be that could factor into this in some in some way. You know, we've we talked a lot about the possibility of them of teams going to Marco Murray on a on a running back and grinding them up. Usually they don't, but some,

you know, some may. And if that's the case, Aaron Jones could get a ton of run if they decide to do that, and then position A J. Dillon as an air apparent for the next season, and they could rest effectively rest a J. Dillon this year now also important, and you've spent a lot of time focusing on yards in it carries inside the five, which is awfully important. But you can't talk about a J. Dillon not talking about his size. He's two hundred fifty pounds, he's six

ft tall. That guy can dominate the line of scrimmage the catch though. Last year, Jones is super productive inside the five. He carried the ball seventeen times from inside the five he scored ten. That's a nice ratio. You're really you're looking for and somebody's spent a lot of time grinding up data from inside to five. You're looking for a fifty percent return on touchdowns and those carries.

He turned seventeen carries into ten touchdowns. That's better than so Jones isn't bad there, But man, A J. Dillon's just built for that use. Um, I am with you, and I'm on A J. Dillon, But it's this one. To me. It was the toughest call on the board, and I went back and forth. At one point I had this as Aaron Jones, then I went to Dylon. But the only reason I went to Dylan's because he's

so cheap. And round fifteen, I think Jamal Williams turns out to be a bit of a non factor this year, and I he's he's the third choice out of all of this. Let's go to our third would you rather teammate? Addition for this particular segment, We've got one segment more

in the show. We go to the tight ends. There are many There are many tight ends tight end position battles to sort of talk about, would you rather have Rob Gronkowski in round six or O. J. Howard in round eighteen, making effectively free last pick of your draft in typical sized leagues. I thought we're gonna talk about my boys in Arizona and breakdown Dan Arnold and Max Williams. Maybe next week. Oh yeah, so yeah. Gronk making his return, reuniting with Tom Brady. Of course, um word has come

out recently, Bruce Arians says Tampa Bay plants. He's a lot of twelve personnel. They're gonna both two wide receivers, suit tight ends, one running back. So let's not forget Cameron Bread by the way, either, because he's still on the team. And Cameron Brad was like a fifteen tight end last year, did better than O. J. Howard. But we're talking Howard and Gronk. Here. What it boils down to is where Gronk is going. There are you're banking

on his ceiling. Basically, you're banking on fourteen fifteen games, and I just don't see him playing like a full season. I'd rather be taking guys like Cook, Austin Hooper, Mike Sicky in the in the in that mid range where Gronk is going, I would quote unquote play. It's safer with O. J. Howard, who was a massive disappointment last year, but he did have a stronger second half. Was the overall tight end first half of the season. The second

half things started to look up. I do think he sees more work than break and I just don't see Gronk living up to his a DP where he's going. I think people are gonna be reaching for the past, so I gotta go as much as I don't really want Oja Howard, if I had to pick one, I'd take o J. Howard for Gronk. Tell me about some of the late round tight ends you do like this year? Yeah, this year. I'm not joking. I really do like Dan Arnold and that's super late. It is super late. Um,

I could talk about this all day. I like, Uh, it depends on your league. He's creeping up and if you want to go super sleeper, I think um Trey Burton can rebound in Indie. Jack Doyle stayed healthy and what about Jack Doyle. Jack Doyle, well, I think he I wouldn't call him. He's probably going top fifteen. He's more of a you know, yeah, but it's the fifteen tight end of the board. He's going around right. Here's that's why I like Rob Gronkowski. Yes, I'm taking his upside.

I'm taking the upside. But if I were to tell you right now and listeners right now, that Rob Gronkowski would finish this year with the most touchdowns, would you be surprised? Like from that's not possible. It's certainly feasible. It's certainly He's done it many times. Right, So he enters into the season with as healthy as he's been in years. He's knows his quarterback intimately, he's Rob Gonkrowski is only thirty one years old. Travis Kelsey is going

to turn thirty one in this season. We don't think of Travis Kelsey is old, right, Gronkowski is not so old that he can't be still good. And yes, I agree, I agree that you're banking. You're banking a bit on the upside for Gronk. But if you believe that you can get a Jack Doyle in round twelve around thirteen and back that pick up with somebody that can still contribute, I like it. I'm taking Rob Gronkowski. I had a feeling you would say that I've been a Gronkowski apologist

for years. Uh, sometimes to my own personal detriment. As it's turned out. Okay, we're gonna take one more break. When we come back, We've got our final three sets of Would You Rather Players? Teammates Edition. It's Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back to Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Charchie and Brian Johnson with you. It's a teammates edition of Would You Rather? Will give you two players on the same team, same

position in who would you rather have? Between them? If you have to pay the average draft position between these players. We go back to Buffalo. We already talked about the running backs. Now we go to the wide receivers. Stefon Diggs going off the board in round four, John Brown going off the board in round number nine. Who would you Rather Have? This is another tough one and going

back to Buffalo, it's gonna be exciting offense. As we mentioned earlier, Let's let's just start with the quarterback for a second. Josh Allen, as we all know, dead last in completion percentage last season, less than fifty, which is not good. We knew that was going to be the case with him coming out of school. That's who he was in college too, Clearly a threat on the ground

and uh, he's unique in that way. Uh So John Brown not a big guy, he's a burner, doesn't have a massive catch radius, and he's looking at his h We're talking about the outside the top thirty percentage. We've done this for other players. John Brown of his games last year, we're outside of the top thirty wide receiver position. He had some big games. He finished as a top twenty PPR wide receiver on the season. But again, that is a massive roller coaster ride. I trust Stephon Diggs

with a chip on his shoulder. Mind you right, Who's sixty seven percent catch rate last season with the Vikings would have led all Buffalo receivers that had more than fifty targets in So I just a huge difference in quarterbacking. It is true, but his high catch rate, not every past was perfect from Chris. He's just a more complete

receiver than John Brown. John Brown. And so here's the one where I and I actually have I think Diggs has his auction value is kind of depressed from when he's been on the Vikings, So I actually have a lot of digs exposure. So I'm going digs here. I think, uh, I think he's in for a big year and he can make up for the inaccuracy of Josh Allen at times. I'm going John Brown because of the differential in cost. Round four versus round nine is a big differential. Um,

they have double, almost exactly double the ADP. The it's uh Stefan Diggs is going off the board at a DP of fifty six. John Brown's a hundred eight. I mean, that's that's a big differential. John Brown was a thousand yard receiver last year, six touchdowns. He's great. I should I failed to mention. I hope this isn't the case. But he did have you know, a ton of injury issues, mainly in his head right, a lot of concussions with Arizona,

which didn't pop up last year. But that was somewhat that's fair certain in my I think I think that's fair too. Um. I think that there's an assumption that Diggs is gonna destroy John Brown's value, that dig is gonna show up and just siphon every ball off. But you know, one of the things that I've been saying for years, Brian, by and large, all all rising water lifts, all ships, and I think Diggs is just as likely

to help John Brown as anything else. Much like we saw Theeling and Diggs get fed for years in Minnesota. I believe we're gonna see Brown and Diggs get fed here and that Diggs is gonna take number one coverage away from John Brown, double coverage away from John Brown, and I think he's gonna hit more of these deep balls than he did before. Digs also a good deep ball receiver, did it with Kirk all the time, So I think I think this this offense is remains a

stretch offense that's gonna feed both guys. Uh, they're both I think gonna have big games and bad good games and bad games because the quarterbacking is is also very inconsistent. But one of them is round four and I'm taking John Brown and round nine. Yeah, and let's not forget Cole Beasley. Just like when we talked about the Dallas receivers and we didn't talk about Michael Galp, Cole Beasley finished as inside the top twenty in the second half

of the season in PPR League last year. He will be a factor and probably a nuisance for Well either or John Brown or if you think Brown, you know, we know Brown's a speedster. We know Digs can can catch these long balls as they are running down field and pulling defenses with them. Here's Cole Beasley underneath. Could be sitting on a really nice PPR season. I can't wait to watch this Buffalo team. And we go back

to Cleveland. We made passing reference to this earlier. Now we go to the running back position and another I think brutally tough decision. Nick Chubb is going off the board in the middle of round two, Kareem Hunt the end of round five. Which of these teammates would you rather take? Chubbing round two? Hunt in round five? Um? Again, I went back and forth on this too. This was a tough one. I like them both. Uh, And for those who forgot, Kareem Hunt missed the first eight games

last year for suspension. But let's just go to Chub. I'm gonna go back to, uh, your favorite spot inside the five charge And this was astonishing to me. I don't know if you've looked into this yet. I'm assuming you have, but uh, last year it Chubb had fifteen attempts inside the five, which is near the top right, for negative fourteen yards. Car And no that's not that's not one big eight yards. I don't know how that happened. And only two touchdowns on fifteen carries inside the five,

like he can't get it done. And then you look at Hunt. They gave him one try in sid for three yards in a touchdown. Maybe try that fourteen more times and you know Hunt, Hunt outscored uh Chubb in the second half in PPR leagues. He didn't. He was never like a top twelve running back, but he was a very safe top twenty play. Chub is volatile and this is a clear I wouldn't say clear cup. I'm going the cheaper guy with Hunt because I think he still could be the best running back in the NFL.

We all know his off the field issues have deterred his career, but not long ago he was the best running back in fantasy football. So I'm going on in heavier PPR leagues, Kareem Hunt outscored Nick Chubb upon his return last year. Hunt was just playing better once he came back, and Hunt ranked number three in Pro football focus is elusiveness rating last year, and despite playing only half of the season, Hunt broke the seventh most tackles

after the catch among all runners. You pro rate that to a full season and Hunt would have been number one and tackles broken after the catch. He's a special player. The only concern is you hope he keeps his head on his shoulders. Really, that's that's it. He's heading into free agency. He has a monetary reason to keep his head on his shoulders. Now, Chub is no slout. You know, Chubb was number two and avoided tackles last year. For

a big man like him, that's really impressive. I think this really, I think you hit this right on the head. Do you believe Nick Chubb will continue to get carries, get all the carries inside the five, and my data showed sixteen carries inside the five year showed fifteen um either way, he converted it into a trivial number of touchdowns. And if and if Chub is if that thing is gonna even itself out, this gets weighted in the favor

of Kareem Hunt by a lot. If those touchdowns are gonna be if those carries inside the five are gonna be split between them, and it's reasonable to think they could. And that's why Kareem Hunt at the end of round five, to me feels like can better pick than Nick Chubb. In round two Now, if you told me you're in a league with without PPR, if you're in a standard scoring league, it's not a question. It's clearly Nick Chubb. But most of us get something for receptions. And now

I'm on cream hunt. Also this again the DeMarco Murray thing. Kareem hunts on his way. He's awaited free agency, so they might throw a lot of extra usage to him, grind him up and let him go last one, and it's time for this. Yes, I have not been able to talk about Sad Trombone Ski for two months. There's been no reason. Well, I'm gonna give you your chance. Because I looked at this and I was like, come on, I'm going forward. I'm gonna let go. Do you want

Do you want Sad trombone Ski or Nick Fools? Now they're both going off that round twenty four, So it's that's both round twenty four, which means they're undrafted in most leagues. Which would you rather have Nick Foles or Sad Trombollsky? What would Nick Foles play like? I feel like I got something like that. That's Doug Flutie, You're I believe right there. I'll wait, I'll wait for this and so I can stop laughing. Um, the end is the best part. By the way, So, how many quarterbacks

are we starting in this league? Decisions, you gotta pick one, you have to roster one of the Foles has always kind of excelled as the guy that comes in right, like the Jeff Hostetler role I remember. So I think if I had to pick one, I'm gonna go with true Whiskey because I think the Bears they surely invested the draft capital way way too much in True Whisky. Just put him out there in the first three or four weeks see if he can hit that magical ceiling

that someone saw that front office. We saw sort of glimmers of it in the past, but it's not gonna come to fruition. So I would just I take trub Whisky my last pick and pray I get it right now. Folds has demonstrated season long upside that Tribhisky can't touch. Trubisky mostly by his legs, has some game to game, like if your best ball and you don't have to try guests when that game is gonna come, that he's

gonna run for thirty yards in a touchdown. Well, here's my angle, they're gonna move him to running back over David Montgomery. They could. Um, that's that's where true whisky can help you. But otherwise, over a season long, we've seen Nick Foles be fantasy relevant for long stretches of time with Philadelphia. So the presumption is that if, if this is a season long conversation, we would rather have

Nick Foles. And yes, I'm sorry, I'll never forget it was fortunate enough to roster him in DFS A day the seven touchdown game for Nick Foles be Raiders. Yes, wow, but I'm pretty sure what did you That wasn't that wasn't the big pay day But okay, but yeah, that that I'll always remember that game. Yeah, I've been the seven touchdown game. Anyone could score seven touchdowns against the Raiders in those days. These days, we don't know. I think the Raiders are sitting on a nice season. I

really do. Uh well, we'll well, we'll break down the Raiders in due course. Thanks for listening. You made it all the way through to the end of Fantasy Football Weekly. If you missed into the prior shows, we encourage to check out our podcasts. Can get those at I Heart Radio or wherever you enjoy your favorite podcasts. Fantasy Football

Weekly is a production of I heart Radio. For more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple podcast, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android