70:  Doubling-blinding dog balls - podcast episode cover

70: Doubling-blinding dog balls

Oct 15, 20181 hr 7 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Dan and James discuss the recent "grievance studies" hoax, whereby three people spent a year writing twenty-one fake manuscripts for submission to various cultural studies journals. They also discuss a new proposal to shift publication culture in which researchers pledge to publish exclusively in community-run journals but only when a pre-specified threshold of support for this commitment by the research community has been met.

Here's an overview of the episode:

  • It’s fat bear week!
  • The new proposal to fix the stranglehold of commercial publishers in academia
  • Flipping journals to open access
  • The ‘grievance studies’ hoax
  • When James first came across the “dog rape” paper
  • What if you were to design the dog study properly?
  • Should we systematically try and hoax journals?
  • Astronomy already injects fake data, can we learn from this?
  • Should these new hoaxes all be associated with Sokal?

Links

Music credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/

Support Everything Hertz

For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android