35: A manifesto for reproducible science
Jan 20, 2017•51 min
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more
Episode description
Dan and James discuss a new paper in the inaugural issue of Nature Human Behaviour, "A manifesto for reproducible science".
Some of the topics covered:
- What's a manfesto for reproducibility doing in a Nature group journal?
- Registered reports
- The importance of incentives to actually make change happen
- What people should report vs. what they actually report
- A common pitfall of published meta-analyses
- The reliance of metrics in hiring decisions and the impact of open science practices
- Tone police
- How do we transition to open science practices?
- SSRN preprints being bought by Elsevier
- Authors getting gouged by copyediting costs (and solutions)
- Does being 'double-blind' extend to doing your analysis blind
- Trial monitoring is expensive
Links
The paper
http://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-016-0021
Our paper on reporting standards in heart rate variability
http://www.nature.com/tp/journal/v6/n5/full/tp201673a.html
Equator guidelines
http://www.equator-network.org
Facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
Twitter account
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android