188: Double-blind peer review vs. scientific integrity
Jan 30, 2025•55 min
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more
Episode description
Dan and James discuss a recent editorial which argues that double-blind peer review is detrimental to scientific integrity.
Links
- The editorial from Christopher Mebane: https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgae046
Other links
Everything Hertz on Bluesky
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
- $1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
- $5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Citation
Quintana, D. S., & Heathers, J. (2025, Jan 30). Double-blind peer review vs. scientific integrity, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/6XS29
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android