16: What makes a good psych study? - podcast episode cover

16: What makes a good psych study?

Jun 15, 201649 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

What are the defining characteristics of a good psychology study? We received this excellent question from a listener and decided to do a whole episode on this idea.

Some of the topics discussed:

  • When’s the last time you saw a psych study that only reported a t-test?
  • Dan and James’ new paper on worry and heart rate variability
  • Skepticism towards studies with many variables and ‘novel’ statistical approaches (that tend to always provide marvellous results)
  • Repeated measures ANOVAs vs. linear mixed models
  • Publishing convenient ideas, even if they’re wrong
  • Fishing expeditions
  • The ‘nocebo’ effect in action
  • What are markers of study quality?
  • Pre-registering studies - can it be gamed?
  • The gradual improvement of psychology studies

Links

Dan and James' new paper on worry and heart rate variability

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27255891

The paper that said "Encouraging experimental psychologists to use LMMs was like giving shotguns to toddlers.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25657634

Facebook page

https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/

Twitter account

https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast

Support Everything Hertz

For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android