The First and Second Banks of the United States - podcast episode cover

The First and Second Banks of the United States

May 24, 202518 minEp. 1783
--:--
--:--
Listen in podcast apps:
Metacast
Spotify
Youtube
RSS

Summary

Discover the financial chaos following the American Revolution that led to the proposal for a national bank. Learn about the fierce constitutional debates and the creation, operation, and eventual failure of the First Bank of the United States. Understand how subsequent financial crises, especially during the War of 1812, necessitated the Second Bank, its tumultuous history under Nicholas Biddle, and its dramatic demise during Andrew Jackson's presidency, shaping early American economic policy.

Episode description

After the American Revolution, the United States economy was in trouble. One solution proposed to solve the crisis was the establishment of a national bank.  The bank wasn’t just an economic issue; it also sparked one of the first constitutional debates in the nation’s history.  Fast-forward several decades, and the United States found itself debating the exact same issue, with very similar results.  Learn more about the first and second Banks of the United States, why they were created, and how they ended on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily. Sponsors Newspapers.com Get 20% off your subscription to Newspapers.com Mint Mobile Cut your wireless bill to 15 bucks a month at mintmobile.com/eed Quince Go to quince.com/daily for 365-day returns, plus free shipping on your order! Stitch Fix Go to stitchfix.com/everywhere to have a stylist help you look your best Tourist Office of Spain Plan your next adventure at Spain.info  Stash Go to get.stash.com/EVERYTHING to see how you can receive $25 towards your first stock purchase and to view important disclosures. Subscribe to the podcast!  https://everything-everywhere.com/everything-everywhere-daily-podcast/ -------------------------------- Executive Producer: Charles Daniel Associate Producers: Austin Oetken & Cameron Kieffer   Become a supporter on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/everythingeverywhere Update your podcast app at newpodcastapps.com Discord Server: https://discord.gg/UkRUJFh Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/everythingeverywhere/ Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/everythingeverywheredaily Twitter: https://twitter.com/everywheretrip Website: https://everything-everywhere.com/  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

After the American Revolution, the United States economy was a mess. One solution which was proposed to solve the crisis was the establishment of a national bank. The bank wasn't just an economic issue. It also sparked one of the very first constitutional debates in the nation's history. Fast forward several decades, and the United States found itself debating the exact same issue with very similar results.

Learn more about the first and second banks of the United States, why they were created, and how they ended up on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily. This episode is sponsored by Planet Money. Tariffs, meme coins, Girl Scout cookies, what do they all have in common? Money.

Economics is everywhere, and everything fueling our lives, even when we least expect it. If you're a fan of Everything Everywhere Daily, and are curious to learn something new and exciting about economics every week, I recommend you listen to the Planet Money podcast from NPR. What I like about Planet Money is that I can get updates on the week's financial news in about 30 minutes. Stories like the Federal Reserve changing interest rates or the impact of trade policy.

From the job market to the stock market to prices at the supermarket, Planet Money is here to help explain it all. The Planet Money hosts go to great lengths to help explain the economy. They've done things like shot a satellite into space, started a record label, made a comic book, and shorted the entire stock market. All to help you better understand the world around you.

Tune in to Planet Money every week for entertaining stories and insights about how money shapes our world. Stories that can't be found anywhere else. Listen now to Planet Money from NPR. Good morning. And I work late because I'm a singer. But this works late. Serum. Redkins ABC 24-7 night and day. beauty sleep for your hair. This serum works

and strength in hair. ABC 24-7 Night sleep for your hair, no matter how The story of America's first two national banks represents one of the most fundamental debates in early American history about the role of the federal government, economic policy, and the interpretation of the Constitution.

However, to truly understand these institutions, we need to start with the economic problems that made them necessary, and then trace how they became flashpoints for the early nations' political divisions. When the United States emerged from the Revolutionary War, the young nation faced a financial crisis that threatened its very survival. The Continental Congress had accumulated massive debts to fund the war effort, both to foreign creditors and domestic investors who had purchased war bonds.

Individual states also carried their own war debts, and the national government, under the Articles of Confederation, lacked the power to tax effectively or regulate interstate commerce. The currency was a mess, with various state-issued papers and foreign coins circulating without any unified system. Credit was nearly impossible to obtain and the new nation's financial reputation internationally was abysmal.

Alexander Hamilton, who was the first Secretary of the Treasury under President George Washington, understood that solving these problems required bold action. Drawing inspiration from the Bank of England, which had successfully managed Britain's finances for decades, Hamilton conceived of a national bank as the cornerstone of his broader financial program. His vision was rather comprehensive.

The federal government would assume all state and national war debts, establish reliable revenue streams through tariffs and excise taxes, and create a national bank to serve as the government's fiscal agent while providing a stable currency and credit system. Hamilton's proposal faced fierce opposition from Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, the leaders of the anti-federalist faction.

Jefferson held a strict constructionist view of the Constitution, asserting that powers not explicitly delegated to the federal government were reserved to the states under the Tenth Amendment. To him, creating a bank was overreach that threatened the balance of federalism.

Beyond the constitutional arguments, critics feared that the bank would centralize economic power in the hands of a wealthy elite, particularly in the commercial centers of the Northeast at the expense of rural interests in the South and West. Many were concerned that it would favor creditors over debtors and large speculators over small farmers. These anxieties echoed the colonial experience with the British Central Bank and the perceived aristocratic nature of European financial systems.

Hamilton countered these criticisms by invoking the Constitution's Necessary and Proper Clause, Article 1, Section 8. arguing that the government had the implied powers needed to fulfill its enumerated responsibilities, such as regulating commerce and collecting tax A national bank he claimed was a practical tool to execute those powers effectively.

President George Washington was caught between the opposing views of his closest advisors, but he ultimately sided with Hamilton after requesting written opinions from both Hamilton and Jefferson. Convinced by Hamilton's reasoning, he signed the bill into law in February of 1791, chartering the Bank of the United States. The First Bank of the United States was designed as a hybrid institution that would serve both public and private functions.

The federal government would own 20% of the bank's stock and appoint 5 of its 25 directors, while private investors would own the remaining 80% and elect the other 20 directors. This structure was intended to ensure government oversight while maintaining the efficiency and profit motive of private enterprise.

The bank received a 20-year charter, was capitalized at $10 million, an enormous sum for that era, and was granted the exclusive privilege of serving as the federal government's primary banking partner. The bank's operations were remarkably sophisticated for its time. It collected federal taxes, distributed government payments, transferred funds between different regions of the country, and issued banknotes that served as a reliable national currency.

There were restrictions on what the bank could do. It could not own government debt, as it was considered a conflict of interest, nor could it incur debts beyond its collateralization. Perhaps most importantly, it provided regulatory oversight of the nation's numerous state chartered banks by accepting their bank notes and regularly presenting them for redemption in specie, aka gold and silver coins, which forced these banks to maintain adequate reserves and prevented excessive speculation.

The first bank proved remarkably successful in achieving Hamilton's objectives. It stabilized the currency, facilitated government operations, and helped establish the United States creditworthiness in international markets. Government bonds that had traded at steep discounts rose to par value, and foreign investments began flowing into the young country.

The bank's branches, eventually numbering eight locations from Boston to New Orleans, created the first truly national financial network in American history. Yet political opposition to the bank only intensified as the Jeffersonian movement gained strength. Critics pointed to the bank's stockholders, many of whom were foreign investors, particularly British subjects, as evidence that the institution served foreign rather than American interests.

When Jefferson became president in 1801, he chose not to wage an immediate battle against the bank, partly because it was functioning effectively and partially because dismantling it would have caused significant economic disruption. However, as the bank's charter approached expiration in 1811, the political landscape had shifted decisively against renewal. The Jeffersonian Republicans now controlled both the presidency and Congress, and they were determined to let the charter expire.

The debate over a recharter revealed how thoroughly partisan politics had come to dominate American governance. Supporters of the bank, now primarily Federalists, argued that its abolition would cripple government finances and destabilize the economy. They pointed to the bank's exemplary record, and that chaos would likely follow in its demise.

Opponents counter that the bank represented everything wrong with Federalist policies, favoritism towards the wealthy, constitutional overreach, and subservience to foreign capital. The vote in Congress was extraordinarily close. The recharter bill failed by a single vote in both the House and the Senate. Vice President George Clinton cast the tie-breaking vote in the Senate against renewal, sealing the bank's fate.

When the charter expired in March of 1811, the First Bank of the United States ceased operations, liquidating its assets and returning capital to shareholders. The timing of the expiration of the bank's charter couldn't have been more ironic, because the next year in 1812, the United States found itself in a war with Great Britain. Whenever a country goes to war, it needs one thing more than weapons and men. Money.

When the War of 1812 began, the Treasury was unable to finance military operations effectively. This forced the government to issue short-term notes at disadvantageous terms and struggle with the logistical challenges of moving funds across the country. The war's financial difficulties powerfully demonstrated the first bank's value. Government credit deteriorated so severely that Treasury notes traded at substantial discounts and the federal government came extremely close to bankruptcy.

Meanwhile, the proliferation of state bank currencies created so much confusion that merchants often had to consult published lists to determine which notes to accept and at what discount rate. These problems convinced many former opponents of the National Bank that some form of federal financial institution was necessary. Even President Madison, who had opposed the First Bank as a congressman, acknowledged that practical experience had demonstrated the need for such an institution.

The economic nationalism that emerged from the War of 1812 created political space for reconsidering federal involvement in banking and finance. The Second Bank of the United States, chartered in 1816, was designed to address the lessons from both the first bank's operations and the chaos that followed in its demise.

The new institution was substantially larger, with a capitalization of $35 million compared to the first bank's $10 million, reflecting the nation's growth and the increased scale of its financial needs. Like its predecessor, the federal government owned 20% of the stock and appointed five of the 25 directors. But the bank's headquarters moved from Philadelphia to Washington, symbolically emphasizing its public rather than private character.

The Second Bank of the United States did not go as well as the first, at least not initially. It was marked by poor management and speculative excess that contributed to the Panic of 1819. The bank's initial president, William Jones, pursued reckless lending policies that fueled a speculative bubble in land and commodities.

When the bubble burst, the resulting economic depression was blamed partly on the bank's mismanagement, providing ammunition for its critics and nearly destroying the institution's credibility before it had a chance to establish itself. The appointment of Nicholas Biddle as president in 1823 marked a turning point in the Second Bank's history. Biddle was an aristocratic Philadelphia intellectual who brought financial expertise and political sophistication to the role.

Under his leadership, the bank developed into arguably the most effective central banking institution in the world at that time. Biddle understood that the bank's power came from its ability to regulate the currency supply by controlling the flow of specie, aka coins, and banknotes throughout the economy. The second bank under Biddle operated what was essentially a central banking system, decades before such institutions became common elsewhere.

The bank used its network of branches, eventually numbering 29 locations, to monitor and influence credit conditions across the country. By expanding or contracting its lending, and by more or less aggressively presenting state bank notes for redemption, Biddle could effectively control the nation's money supply and influence economic conditions. This power made the second bank enormously influential, but also deeply controversial.

Biddle's policies generally promoted economic stability and growth, but they also meant that a single institution controlled largely by private interests could determine credit conditions for the entire country. Critics argued that this gave the bank dangerous power over the economic welfare of ordinary Americans, particularly farmers and small business owners who depended on credit for their operations. These tensions came to a head with Andrew Jackson's election as president in 1828.

Jackson brought to the presidency a deep suspicion of banks in general, and the National Bank in particular. His opposition was both philosophical and personal. He believed that banks allowed the wealthy to manipulate the economy, and he had personal experience with bank failure. The conflict between Jackson and Biddle escalated throughout Jackson's first term. Biddle decided to force the issue by applying for recharter in 1832, four years before the existing charter would expire.

This timing was intended to make the bank a central issue of the 1832 presidential election, with Biddle believing that Jackson would not dare oppose renewal during a campaign. Middle's calculation proved to be a catastrophic error. Jackson welcomed the opportunity to make the bank the central issue of his re-election campaign, framing the contest as a battle between ordinary Americans and privileged elites.

His veto message when Congress passed the recharter bill was one of the most famous political documents in American history. The 1832 election did indeed become a referendum on the bank, and Jackson's overwhelming victory demonstrated the political power of his anti-bank message. Jackson interpreted his reelection as a mandate to destroy the second bank even before its charter expired.

In 1833, Jackson began withdrawing federal deposits from the bank and placing them in selected state banks, which opponents dubbed Pet Bank. This action precipitated what became known as the Bank War, one of the most intense political battles in American history. Biddle responded to the withdrawal of federal deposits by contracting credit sharply, helping to create economic pressure that would force Jackson to reverse his course.

This policy caused significant economic distress across the country with businesses failing and unemployment rising. But it also backfired politically by appearing to confirm Jackson's charges that the bank wielded dangerous power over the economy. When the Second Bank's charter expired in 1836, Biddle obtained a state charter from Pennsylvania and continued operating as a state institution.

However, without its federal privileges and facing continued political hostility, the bank struggled financially and finally failed completely in 1841. The demise of the Second Bank of the United States left the United States without a central banking institution until the establishment of the Federal Reserve in 1913. The establishment of the Federal Reserve will be the subject of its own future episode.

The debates surrounding the first and second banks of the United States set important precedents, highlighting the tensions between federal authority and states' rights, between elite control and popular democracy, and between financial innovation and fears of centralization. And these very same issues would appear time and time again throughout the rest of American history.

The executive producer of Everything Everywhere Daily is Charles Daniel. The associate producers are Austin Oakden and Cameron Kiefer. I want to thank everyone who supports the show over on Patreon. Your support helps make this podcast possible. I'd also like to thank all the members of the Everything Everywhere community who are active on the Facebook group and the Discord server. If you'd like to join in the discussion, there are links to both in the show notes.

And as always, if you leave a review or send me a boostagram, you too can have it right on the show.

This transcript was generated by Metacast using AI and may contain inaccuracies. Learn more about transcripts.
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android
Open in Metacast