Everyday Injustice Podcast Episode 209: Is Civil Commitment Double Jeopardy? - podcast episode cover

Everyday Injustice Podcast Episode 209: Is Civil Commitment Double Jeopardy?

Jul 24, 202334 min
--:--
--:--
Listen in podcast apps:
Metacast
Spotify
Youtube
RSS
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

This week on Everyday Injustice, we spoke with Emma Ruth, who recently wrote a piece with the Prison Policy Initiative on the little known and often misunderstood practice of civil commitment. The 20 states include California and Illinois. She noted that 20 states and the federal Bureau of Prisons “detain over 6,000 people, mostly men, who have been convicted of sex offenses in prison-like “civil commitment” facilities beyond the terms of their criminal sentence.” Some of these commitments are indefinite. While there are questions about the constitutionality of the practice, in 2017, the US Supreme Court “declined to hear a case from Minnesota after a federal judge deemed the practice unconstitutional.” Among the concerns raised in the segment – the lack of safeguards, the fact that these are “shadow prions” without full due process of law, questionable evidence-based practices, and the overall deplorable conditions of the facilities themselves.
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android
Open in Metacast
Everyday Injustice Podcast Episode 209: Is Civil Commitment Double Jeopardy? | Everyday Injustice podcast - Listen or read transcript on Metacast