Support for this podcast comes from Is Business Broken? A podcast from BU's Mehrotra Institute that explores questions like, why are executives paid so much? Do they deserve it? Listen wherever you get your podcasts. WBUR Podcasts. Boston. We're in the feed an extra day this week.
Which, if you listened to our most recent episode, The Stream Is Up, you may have been expecting... And if you haven't, you should definitely go listen to that episode first. It introduces you to the wildly popular and also controversial... What he's all about, how he's delivering his message to millions of followers, and who he's reaching and resonating with.
At the end of that episode, we mentioned we'd be sharing a longer version of our conversation with Hassan Piker because, well, he's a big deal in this space and he has a lot to say about the Democratic Party, about the streaming platform Twitch and about what's further. dividing Americans right now.
So here's more of that conversation with Hassan Piker. And just a little context, we spoke to him just a few weeks after the presidential election, when the whole what did the Dems do wrong debate was still very fresh. But we started with the basics. Like, what does a day in the life of a serial streamer look like?
I usually stream from 11 a.m. Pacific time all the way until like 8 p.m. Pacific time every single day, seven days a week. That means on the weekends as well. That means on holidays as well. No exceptions. And I've kind of kept up with that schedule since 2020 when I went full time. Before then, I was still streaming, but my hours were different. And the reason why I don't go any earlier than that.
even though it would probably be better for the East Coast audience to get their news earlier, is because I have this little window, this little pocket of time every morning where I have to do some research, figure out exactly what I want to talk about. And also work out and go outside, interact with other human beings, take my dog out. I call it, you know, my grass touching hour. And I do that so that I can maintain this healthy work life balance, which is interesting.
because I don't think people would consider eight hours of broadcasting every single day, seven days a week to be healthy. But it is something that I enjoy. And, you know, I have, I guess, figured out a way to make it work for myself. Can I ask what might seem like an overly simplistic question, but why stream for eight hours a day? I really enjoy it. And also there's a lot of news to cover.
And outside of that, I think that there's also a lot of fun to be had besides talking just about the news and doing outreach to a broader community. and, uh, and, and trying to get them on board to at least like view the world from a more charitable perspective to the way I see it. So there's like a, there's like a mission for you in that, like a, uh,
altruistic mission or something. I mean, I don't know if it's altruistic. Some people might consider it to be, you know, propagandistic, I guess. Or is that even a word? They would say it's propaganda. Would you say it's propaganda? I do. Yeah. I don't think it's necessarily, I don't think propaganda necessarily is a bad word, but you know it's, I feel like it's more so it's, it's considered a bad word when someone uses it in, especially the Western world, but.
Yeah, I think that you can be honest with the things that you're talking about. I always openly recognize that I'm a biased person. And I always say that, you know, I always am upfront with what my biases are.
Like when people come and yell at me and they'll say like, you have an ulterior motive. I'm like, my ulterior motive is very clear. I want, I want healthcare for all, you know what I mean? I want socialized medicine in this country. Like this is something that I'm absolutely biased on. Right. Right.
And so it's not ulterior, it's like out front. You're like, this is what I believe, this is what I want, right? Yeah, and the way I see it, I think that that is more honest because everyone has biases. And I would rather be forthcoming with my biases than try to dupe people into this false notion of neutrality that some people present. I think you recently said that your online space was one of the last spaces online that is majority men that isn't like insane politically.
So do you worry ever that you're preaching to your people and not preaching beyond that? Like, do you worry that the audience you have is not the audience you need to accomplish your goals? Yes and no. I think that there's always a larger audience that I could talk to and convince. That's something that I'm very well aware of.
And that's precisely the reason why I also collaborate with a lot of content creators that I'm friends with that have these rather apolitical or even sometimes right wing audiences as well. But having said that, my community...
didn't just materialize overnight. It actually took years and years of streaming to get to the point that it got to. And every single person in my community would be the first to... tell you like i was transphobic or i had some racist opinions and i like you convinced me that that that was
not necessarily the right way to look at things and right way to approach things. There's an intersectionality of privilege. Everyone has certain blind spots. I recognize that human beings are imperfect and we're all on our journey of learning. and development and becoming better versions of ourselves. And that's a first principle that I apply in my commentary and in my community building.
And I'm very understanding of people's shortcomings, especially when it comes to how they might have been victim to social conditioning, how they were duped in some ways by things that they took for granted. things that they assumed were just the truth without re-examination so my goal is to uh to to expose some of the flaws in the ways that a lot of people think
and take for granted what they have decided are firm truths, right? That they've learned from a very early age. And I myself have had this transformation in my own personal journey as well. It's not something that I hide. I used to have transphobic opinions. I mean, this was a decade plus ago, but it doesn't matter. This was something that I definitely would joke about.
And I think that makes me, I use that experience to, I think, better de-radicalize people as well and tell them like, listen, you can have... certain perspectives. It's more so about like always being charitable and admitting when you're wrong and maybe developing a better mindset around certain things with more information.
And being open probably to the possibility that you're wrong, which leads to admitting when you're wrong. Yeah, absolutely. How much do you know about your audience, Hassan? Who they are? How old they are? how inclined they are to think the way that you do already versus how much of this kind of de-radicalizing you might have to do with the people who are coming to watch you every day? I mean, I can't speak for every single individual, but like...
There are a lot of people in my community that are very forthcoming about this sort of thing. There are a lot of people in my community that have, you know, gotten, I guess, I wouldn't use the term radicalized, but... gotten activated and motivated to go out and run for local office, become community organizers, become union organizers, unionize their workplaces, many examples of that.
I think it's not necessarily a captive audience that I just tapped into, especially because I don't think my position, the way I see the world. The way I examine the world from a materialist perspective, for example, is well represented in any aspect of traditional or mainstream media. I think it's outside of the confines of even.
uh many of the liberal institutions so uh i don't think that there is necessarily this firm audience that was just like waiting and they were like oh finally you know i Finally, I already read all the volumes of Das Kapital, and I was waiting for a guy who can, you know. have a similar worldview and a similar ideological framework, but then also is shooting the shit and having fun. So it's more so that people, I think...
come in and they're like, well, that's a cool guy. He seems progressive. He doesn't seem like an asshole. He looks kind of bro-y, maybe a little too bro-y for me, or maybe that's beneficial for a lot of young men that they look at someone that they... identify with like a white dude who likes to work out and play video games and they go hmm like this seems like a like a different community than the one i'm used to let me let me hear him out
he's after all collaborating with some of my favorite content creators like i'll just i'll just tune in to see what this guy is all about right and then i think slowly but surely the process is uh they start maybe unlearning certain things that they took for granted. It could be about misogyny. It could be about interpersonal relationships with the women. It could be their...
It could be a re-examination of the way they understood, I don't know, gay people, trans people and the like, or even white supremacy, police brutality, any number of different things, climate change. relationship with their bosses. Because I am a firm believer that a lot of people don't have the tools. to really develop class consciousness and to understand their position in society, even if they are, when given the opportunity, very progressive. I think...
We have a tendency to say Americans are just like automatically reactionary. They're all racist. They're all sexist, homophobic. They want to purge all the immigrants and whatnot. And I think that.
many americans are simply just not given an option of an alternative a vision for society uh and they are operating within the confines of either this like marginally less bad liberal version or this far-right insane version um and and uh they just i think hyper focus on the aesthetics in that process and make up their minds that way
Whereas if you even look at the reality of this past election cycle, you see a place like Missouri, very far right, voted for Donald Trump, voted for Josh Hawley. Josh Hawley is a little unique because he also puts on this populist front. You know, he'll go to a picket line or whatever every now and then. Having said that, Missouri, you know, very right wing state. And yet they voted for increasing minimum wage, $15 an hour and also emergency leave. They voted.
uh to enshrine abortion protections in their state constitution i mean these are pretty progressive opinions right and yet they did not vote for the party that was pushing that and i think that there is a crisis in communication for the democratic party there But I think it also shows that Americans in the Rust Belt, in the Midwest, in the Sun Belt, everywhere around the country are far more progressive.
than the way we think about them and then the way that people present them in media. Yeah, and that's often, I feel like that's often what progressives have... imagined right it's like these are things that people actually if you actually talk to people about what they care about what they believe they're not like they're not going to be like oh if i had you know if i had
like good access to healthcare, that's evil socialism or something. They're going to be like, Oh, actually that sounds pretty good. Or if you offer them like protections for the work that they do, um, at their day job, uh, you know, like you're, if. If you actually talk to them about the details, you know, most Americans are more progressive than they realize. I think progressives believe that, firmly believe that. And it's more of a messaging.
problem for the Democrats where like, you know, or maybe they're just getting outmatched by the other side. And I think that there's obviously an underlying material reason for this as well. Republicans, you know, hammer on wedge issues. fairly aggressively in an effort to polarize themselves from the Democratic Party. And I think the Democratic Party constantly finds themselves running defense against said wedge issues that the Republicans make into this massive problem.
And they dominate the media ecosystem. And liberals constantly find themselves, I think, playing defense in hostile territory where the boundaries have been set by the Republicans. and the right-wing media ecosystem like fox and the independent stations out there so uh this is still entirely in the hands of the democratic party i always say this uh where where they
should be putting forth certain policies that they're running on that the Republicans have to, in a reactionary fashion, position themselves against. But these policies have to be universal. And I think because the Democratic Party is still, at the end of the day, beholden to the same corporate interests that they are actively trying to raise funds from, actively trying to defend, just like the Republican Party.
they end up in this unique predicament where they're trying to have this big tent, but also simultaneously hyper-focusing on... key demographics, key constituencies in this very weird fashion where they don't have a broad universality message. They don't have this left populist message and it ends up coming across as, as, um, very smarmy elitist uh almost technocratic in their approach i think kamala harris was a perfect demonstration of that right um
There was this they saw one poll that said, you know, black people, black men specifically might actually swing to the Republican Party. I I this happens every election cycle. I immediately was like, this is ridiculous.
hyper focusing on black men in this regard is so silly considering that you know white men are overwhelmingly pro-republican party and and this swing from black men is going to be marginal at best and hyper focusing on black men in this regard is silly but They saw that poll and their answer for that was like, we're going to protect black men and their cryptocurrency.
Right. And also we're going to yell at them in the meantime and give them a hard time. Yeah, we're going to activate Barack Obama to go talk about how misogynistic black men are. And then also on the policy front, we're just going to hyper target like... some black men by saying like oh we're gonna protect your crypto assets and it's like that kind of stuff i think is is
you know, means tested policies that are objectively unpopular, in my opinion, like a more popular version of those policies would exist if you were presenting it in a universal fashion. And then it's hyper specific, it's hyper targeted. And I feel like that just ends up unnecessarily coming across as divisive for a lot of people where they see that and go, what is this? Like, I don't really understand. So they're not really addressing any of the broader issues.
that a lot of Americans are facing. And I think part of that is because, and I think Chris Murphy was a really interesting person to hear this from, but a lot of that is because they're afraid of disrupting the status quo.
pissing off their corporate benefactors that they really care about. That is the core constituency that the Democratic Party cares about. How can you do that? Well, you do that by saying we're... pro-trans without really you know doing much about it just simply saying that you're pro-trans and it's really interesting because they didn't even do that this time around and it seems like uh uh you know they were the democratic party was like more focused on
uh not even saying that they're pro-trans and just moderating to the right even more and then turning around and in the aftermath of this election autopsy going oh we were too pro-trans you weren't at all You actually cut anti-trans ads. Colin Allred cut anti-trans ads. Many Democrats cut those ads because they were responding to the Republican smears.
I think what ends up happening in that situation for a lot of people who don't have any sort of like ideological connection to any of these marginalized groups is they look at that and they go, why are you admitting that you got caught? You just look like a hypocrite now. That's the way people see it. We want to ask you, I think, about the kind of aftermath here. Kamala Harris' campaign invited you to the DNC.
Curious about your thoughts looking back at all of this. Like Donald Trump obviously won. wondering how that may or may not have changed the sense of urgency or responsibility that you have towards your own community that you've built. And how are you thinking about talking with them about going forward? And how do you feel about the Kamala Harris campaign looking back at this? If anybody followed my commentary closely...
throughout the election cycle, they would have noticed a very significant attitude shift in opposite directions. First, in a very positive way, when Joe Biden... was was swapped out with kamala harris and it wasn't necessarily positive because i was like oh i'm so stoked about kamala harris like i was very critical of kamala's uh failure uh in in the uh 2019 primaries i very openly understood that
She presented herself as like a Bernie style left populace when she wasn't actually genuinely that person at all. It was a time when she was a California senator when, you know. the democrats had no power so they were willing to go out to bat for these like broad uh populist messages and and popular policies like medicare for all right And she still came across as inauthentic in that primary, and that's why she had to drop out. And so I was very familiar with her track record, but I was still...
excited because, one, Kamala Harris has always been a bit of a blank slate. Like, she has certain opinions, but it's very obvious that she is like a machine politician. She is the generic Democrat in many ways. that the New York Times poll showed was beating Joe Biden by 25 points, right? So... I was excited at this new blank slate almost. And more so, I was excited at the fact that the Democratic Party had responded to public pressure.
This was unique. This was a truly unique moment where the establishment Democrats and the Democratic Party's base of support and the donors in the Democratic Party were aligned, right? All the planets aligned. Nancy Pelosi came in. Joe Biden dropped out. Kamala Harris gets swapped in. And then they went with Tim Waltz. Out of all of the choices that they had, Tim Waltz was...
one of the most earnest and one of the most progressive choices that they could have gone with. And I thought at the time, this is also good. It didn't go with Josh Shapiro, who was conservative and is conservative. I mean, he's... worked with the Republicans in his own state of Pennsylvania to push for incredibly right-wing bills like the school voucher program bill that undermines teachers' unions in his own state.
That was a non-starter for me. A lot of people focused on Josh Shapiro's, you know, I don't know, high school essays about how he wanted to go and do community service with the IDF or how... uh arabs are uh you know genetically violent or something i don't care most democrats already are pro-israel uh and and that wasn't the that wasn't that uh different from any of the other democrats up there
But I think with Tim Walls, his own personal policies in the state of Minnesota, like what his legislative agenda, his Democratic Party legislative agenda was, was something that the... Kamala Harris campaign was going to have to address something that they had actually tied themselves to paid family leave paid, you know, emergency leave.
feeding children in schools, like school lunch programs, things of that nature. And the fact that this guy was also a school teacher, I really liked all of those things. So I was very excited at what things might look like. And having said that... Given my coverage of the Democratic Party for the past 10 years, I was still very careful in my commentary. I kept repeating the position over and over again. If Democrats go back to their old ways, they will.
tack to the right, and they will end up losing. And I said this over and over again, but at the time I was like, you know, I'm going to stand back. I'm going to see if Kamala Harris separates herself from Joe Biden on key issues, Gaza, maybe even immigration in some ways, and communicate a different way. about immigration in this country that goes against the Biden agenda from the year prior. But you were ultimately disappointed. DNC was my turning point.
Okay. Why? What made you turn in that moment? So I got invited to the DNC. Shouts out to the Kamala Harris campaign. I think that they were already like at odds. They were butting heads with the DNC to begin with. Yeah. like the Democratic Party to begin with for that choice. And when I got invited to the DNC, I saw a couple things. One, Kamala Harris was coming to the DNC with a tremendous amount of fundraising because...
The base of support actually was like, the base of support was actually excited, right? And they wanted to reward the party. So they came in with this massive war chest. fundraising was out of control. They almost raised like a billion dollars, right? Leading up to the DNC. And I saw a couple things. One, I was shocked.
at how not tapped into the real world I was when I was at the heart of where things are happening. I was genuinely shocked at how out of touch I was with everything else that was going on in the world. Because when you're there, when you're in that bubble, when the DC bubble comes to Chicago, right, you're still in that DC bubble. And I now understand why so many people, so many staffers, so many analysts.
So many of these guys that, you know, write these think pieces and whatnot are so unimaginably out of touch with the needs and opinions of regular old, you know, American working class people. Because the DC bubble travels. Yeah. Another thing that I was truly shocked by was how excited, like the air of excitement and enthusiasm that I saw at the DNC. I was like, guys, you know.
Kamala Harris made up around 10 points from Joe Biden, but it's not like she's 10 points above Donald Trump right now. And yet everyone was celebrating. It was Brad Summer. It's happening, baby. Brass summer is here. Everyone was going crazy. Like they were putting up LeBron numbers. All of a sudden, like she was going to do a Reagan style sweep or something. Like I couldn't comprehend it.
I was like, why are they so excited? I felt like I was in a different planet. These guys were living in a different planet. And then, slowly but surely, I also started noticing certain things. Like, you know, first day of the DNC, I obviously...
attended the pro-Palestinian protests that were happening right outside of the DNC. The city was entirely locked down surrounding the DNC to begin with because they were very worried about a... uh you know mass protests like disrupting the event democrats inside with the exception of the uncommitted movement and like a lot of these delegates and whatnot and like younger uh younger staffers
Like the establishment was completely oblivious or was purposefully avoiding even talking about Gaza. And besides that... Obviously, by the last day, all this drama occurred where the Democrats chose to have multiple police officers, Republicans speak at the DNC. And yet. No Palestinian-American like Rua, for example, who is a Georgia Democrat, right? And the uncommitted movement was there the entire time.
And they were treated in some ways as like pariahs almost. And I was very frustrated by that. I thought that they are actively communicating that. Arab Americans, Muslim Americans, and not just, and this isn't just a sectarian issue either, like young Americans in general, college students and Americans who are upset about...
what is going on in Gaza and what Joe Biden is allowing to continue in Gaza with all the endless amounts of power and influence we have over Israel. They were frustrated with this. This is a broad coalition of people. And yet their needs were not being addressed. It was very obvious that the Democratic Party was basically doing what I feared the most that they would end up doing, which is tack to the right and like, you know, communicate with fracking.
We're good with fracking. Yeah. Pro fracking. I have a gun. Yeah. Muscular border policy. And also something that she said that I could not. i could not believe was when she said she wants to oversee she wants to have the most lethal military you're a democrat i i can't like i don't understand why a democrat would ever present themselves as that like that's I don't even hear the Republicans often say it in those terms, right? Like we're going to have the most lethal military on the planet.
like the lethality is the purpose of the military i understand that but you're not supposed to say that in a positive way you're not supposed to own it it's like there's a reason why we call it the defense department now and not the war department right because The optics of that are almost icky when you think about it. I don't know, it's kind of silly to say it like that, but all of that showed me that the Democrats were not interested in...
running a 2008 style Obama coalition focused campaign, you know, people back the movement. And instead they were going further to the right of even Joe Biden in 2020. And in many respects, they did do just that. They went to the right of Joe Biden in 2020 on immigration, for example. Joe Biden himself went to the right of Joe Biden in 2020 on immigration by the end of his tenure, but...
Still, Kamala Harris had a fantastic opportunity to address the economic anxieties that people were experiencing as a direct consequence of the price of goods outpacing wage growth. They didn't really do that. They had one solid policy on that front that they just back pocketed. Right. Kamala Harris came out of the gate swinging with this with the combating price gouging.
immediately gave her her flowers for that i said that's a great way to communicate this to americans and it was profoundly popular right um at a time when this is something that is a major problem it was addressing their needs saying i'm gonna go after price gougers I'm going to lower forcibly the price of your groceries by going after the grocers. And it was universally condemned by the media apparatus. It was condemned by the Republicans who said, it's Venezuela, it's Venezuela.
And yet its popularity actually never diminished in that process. It actually went up. When she first suggested the policy, I think it was sitting around 79%. After a month of attacks from the Republicans, it went up to 83%. And yet they stopped pushing it. why did they stop pushing it i guess somewhere along the way tony west came in and was like don't do this anti-billionaire anti-corporatist uh agenda i think that that's a bad way to message
We have to show the billionaires that we're on, you know, we're on their side. And of course, Tony West is, you know, I think legal counsel for Uber or something. So, you know. understandable that he would have that position kamala harris's brother-in-law and uh and and we saw what happened they brought forward mark cuban as a surrogate and he started talking about uh
You know, he started talking about how Kamala was going to be great for corporations and the wealthy, but subtly, right? Well, we also heard a lot of people in the wake of Donald Trump winning the election pointing to podcasts like... Joe Rogan, streamers that are thought of as more right wing or in the quote unquote manosphere as being a reason that, you know, a lot of younger male voters were mobilized to go to the polls. And I'm curious.
What you make of that and if you feel like I have heard you referred to before and you may bristle at this, but I've heard you referred to before as like the left Joe Rogan. And I'm curious what you make of that. how you think about... How things might have gone differently? Were there not enough of you, people like you? Could you have streamed for more hours? You know, like what more could have been done to kind of counteract the Manosphere streamer?
influence that people seem to be pointing to. I just don't think that we can podcast our way out of this problem. Like, I just don't think that the Democrats... Oh, come on, man. Come on. There's no way that the Democratic Party can have, you know, a thousand Joe Rogans. Let a thousand Joe Rogans bloom. And then all of a sudden... You know, people are going to be blue pilled and become firmly committed to the third way neoliberalism that the Democratic Party represents.
Like this technocratic approach, like you're failing to comprehend. There are already people that do this. There are plenty of people who are pro-democratic party in the independent space. They just don't represent a real constituency.
There are the likes of Harry Sasson, for example. He's wonderful. He's a very smart kid. I like him a lot, but he is functionally a Democratic Party mouthpiece. He's on TikTok. I think he plays a very important role of... making the Democrats feel like people that look like Harry Sasson are on board with their agenda, when in fact his entire audience is probably Democratic Party people that are looking at that, like older Democrats looking at that and going, see?
This cheeky, rosed kid is saying the exact same things that I hear from MSNBC. So the youth must like all of this, right? And it's not real. Right. It's not a real audience. It's not a real audience of like young men in particular. And. Well, if we can't podcast our way out of it, then do you see your potential impact as being limited?
Well, my potential impact will always be limited unless the Democratic Party from the top down gets together and decides like we have to do left wing economic populism. Like my, I can only do so much. I can do, I can do a whole bit about, you know, de-radicalizing people or actively getting them to, to understand unionization is importance. Right. And.
and maybe even get them to successfully unionize their workplaces and whatnot. But like, that is marginal. The Democratic Party as an institution has to re-examine its relationship with wealthy corporate benefactors. and not be afraid to identify them as enemies. I think Donald Trump does this very well all the time. He doesn't care. He will tell you exactly who his enemies are. And I think that the Democrats are scared of putting up a fight.
They're notoriously scared of putting up a fight and being even remotely disturbing. They're worried about preserving the institutions at a time when even all the way back in 2016. People very clearly did not care about the institutions. They did not think that they were worthy of preserving. That's why they vote over the sledgehammer that was going to destroy it, right? I guess my point is someone like myself can only be impactful.
I guess, or maybe most impactful if the Democrats actually listened to what I was saying and maybe changed their strategies, changed their attitudes a little bit and stopped. Running away from their base and instead ran towards their base a little bit. More of our conversation with Hasan Piker in a minute. Support for Endless Thread comes from BetterHelp. Let's talk numbers. In-person therapy can cost anywhere from $100 to $250 per session, which adds up.
But with BetterHelp Online Therapy, you can save on average up to 50% per session. Therapy should feel accessible, not like a luxury. With over 30,000 therapists, BetterHelp has served over 5 million people globally and helps you fit therapy into your busy life. Your well-being is worth it. Visit betterhelp.com slash endless thread to get 10% off your first month. That's betterhelp.com slash endless thread.
We're back with more of our conversation with Hassan Piker from last November. We want to talk about another topic here that I think you're passionate about, which is effectively Palestine. So earlier in November, Twitch banned certain uses of the word Zionist. Yeah. How do you feel about that? I think it's silly. And I think that they were worried about a bad faith smear campaign that was actually started and pushed by.
A group of content creators that were not on Twitch, that were on a platform that was actually, ironically enough, significantly more reactionary. And... And they went to advertisers and they like did this mass emailing campaign, very similar to Gamergate. For those of you who don't know, it was just basically like a bad faith. clipped out of context compilation that they were sending to be like see this guy hassan he's bad he's anti-semi he's a
He's a lover of terrorism and he's one of the top content creators on this platform. And, you know, you don't want your ads running against this. And like, of course, advertisers, they don't like any sort of controversy, even if there is no real controversy there whatsoever. Very worried about brand safety, for sure. And I think Twitch responded to that pressure campaign by just kind of capitulating. First, they put forth a CCL, content classification label.
for politics sensitive issues and then they were like no more ads running on that right so we you know we isolate political commentary on the platform now it doesn't impact me as much because i i don't like running ads anyway I have always negotiated my contracts to make sure that I run the minimum amount of ads allotted or in that timeframe.
In comparison to people who are running like 22 minutes of ads an hour, I was running four. And my contract was already up regardless. So, you know, I was not going to run ads anyway. So it didn't really impact me, but it impacted a lot of smaller content creators. Jewish content creators as well that do political commentary on the platform. It hurt their bottom line. It hurt their revenue opportunities. There were a lot of people who also got caught in the crosshairs.
Faiz Kason, who had Iran as a tag, he's Iranian. And he wanted to get the attention of Iranian Twitch watchers.
And there was another content creator who was Venezuelan who also reported the same. It's like if you had Iran as a tag on your SEO, if you had Venezuela as a tag on your SEO, because these are like State Department designated... you know, funders of terror or whatever, which is like a very political designation is not, you know, they, uh, they, they had noticed a direct revenue decline, like complete revenue decline.
from advertising. And all of that happened because of this pressure campaign. But Twitch, I think, sometimes gets things wrong. And is too beholden and too fearful of saying no to outside pressure campaigns. But overall, I think that they have a very rigid... rigorous application of its terms of service in comparison to any of these other platforms. I'm on every single one of these platforms. I'm a content creator on TikTok. I started off on Facebook, Instagram.
I'm on YouTube. I have a channel everywhere, right? I'm on Twitter. Twitch is, and I will always say this as someone who's been banned for something I consider to be ridiculous. They banned me for anti-white racism because I said cracker, right?
back in the day which was another one of these like silly pressure campaigns that actually worked wow even though sometimes they can be heavy-handed and sometimes they can be inconsistent i think they uh they do their very best to ensure that it's a It's as safe a platform as possible in comparison to many of these other platforms.
How important is it for you in terms of what you're trying to do to speak off the cuff? Because I feel like there was this thing with Fox News last week, I think, that you had to respond to or that you decided to respond to, this like supercut thing. Um, you know, obviously people are gonna, whatever we live in, this is like the media ecosystem now, right? Like things get taken out of context and that's like very normal and, and sort of part of the playbook. But, um, you know.
What do you think about as you're speaking to your audience and how your eight hours of streaming a day is going to sort of get... digested and recut by the media machine that exists outside of that and how it will be used against you and how do you talk to your audience in a way or your perspective audience, if you're going on another content creator's channel and that audience is maybe right wing, how do you think about making sure people understand where you're actually coming from?
I just try to do my very best to the best of my ability. I am human. At the end of the day, it was very difficult to make sure that things won't be cut. out of context and an eight-hour conversation especially when this eight-hour conversation is is uh supposed to be uh somewhat more palatable and it's on these incredibly complex
issues, geopolitical issues that deserve a lot of nuance. And in many instances, even like dense academic literature backing the positions. And I'm trying to repackage that to the best of my ability for eight to 10 hours every single day.
in a way that is like funny and appealing and in a way that like the layman uh can understand in a way that young people can understand and um And in that process, I think, of course, I mean, there are fan-made Hasan Abi clips out of context compilations out there with millions of views, you know, like it's, you can...
Over the course of eight hours, you can make me come across like I am the exact opposite person, the firm and committed believer in right-wing attitudes and ideologies, right? And people sometimes do that.
And I think a lot of people understand that this is just a part of the media ecosystem. So it's just noise. But I'm sure that there are plenty of people who get duped by stuff like that because... I always am as charitable as I possibly can be to like, you know, everyday people that don't have the time to go and watch someone talk about these issues for hours and hours.
uh you know they're just they just see something they just see a compilation or an article or uh you know there's there's a lot of people on youtube that do this as well it's slop content it's like drama content And they just watch that and they're like, well, I know everything I need to know about this person and I'm moving on. I don't like that guy anymore. And it's okay. Like there's not much I can do about that at this point. So.
I just go about my day, you know, and I hope that people will come in with a level of intellectual curiosity and a level of charitability that they they're like, let me let me see what this guy is about. And I think. In that process, they will very quickly come to a very different conclusion. They'll be like, oh, maybe he wasn't the way that he was presented, right?
One of the challenges for you has to be how you're presented to these folks by folks who maybe you used to collab with and don't anymore. Can you talk a little bit about Ethan and where you guys met? how you met and how that relationship has become challenged? Yeah, of course. Ethan Klein is a very famous YouTuber. He's a massive content creator on YouTube, millions of followers. He has a very successful podcast. Originally...
He had reached out to me many years ago to do an episode of his podcast, H3H Productions during COVID. And we really, really kicked it off. And I think like leading up. I think Ethan just wanted to build some kind of a political branch within his podcast ecosystem. And he decided he wanted to do this thing called leftovers with me where we would just like talk about politics. And he and, you know, I think he went on his own personal journey as well.
from his past positions. He was a little bit edgier, I think, back in the day. Describe edgier. What do you mean? I mean, there's a lot of stuff that I think old YouTubers engaged in that now we look back at and cringe, right? Things like that. I don't want to get too far into it. I'm not that invested in that. But I think he had like a moment of self-reflection that was genuine. And in that process, he decided like he was going to go on a journey of learning and, you know.
try to promote more progressive attitudes and ideals. And in that process, I think also with the success of the Frenemies podcast that he had with Trisha Paytas, he developed this very progressive majority female audience. And, you know, and then October 7 happened and we, I guess we had some disagreements.
The disagreements weren't as severe at first, at least the way I saw it, because I knew that he had in the past been extremely critical of Israel. Ethan had gone on birthright and met his wife Hila there. I think that he has a lot of familial connections to Israel that he doesn't personally have or didn't personally have originally. I can't speak on his own internal convictions or what's going on in his own mind, but there were definitely some disagreements that we had very publicly.
uh early on in the leftovers podcast and there were a lot of moments of grace where he gave me an opportunity to to speak on Palestinian emancipation uh side by side i remember middle east i actually did this very viral post about Ethan, who at the time was crying about Palestinian children and how he was a father and how emotional that was for him, seeing that. But we, I guess, put the podcast on hold because of some of these disc streams. Some of them were very public in terms of like...
how much I wanted to focus on the Palestinian side of things and how much he also came at it with, with charitability saying like, I understand the Palestinian side of things. I'm talking about this, but like, why can't you hear out?
my positions and i think like one of the major points of disagreement famously was over from the river to the sea palestine will be free he considered this to be an anti-semitic phrase i did not i thought you know i likened it to uh someone saying black lives matter means you know white lives don't matter like it's not there's no instance where like an emancipatory slogan is going to be uh reframed
uh by by uh people who are sympathetic to uh to the group that is actually uh enforcing sovereignty over this group of people right and You know, we had these conversations, but I think I guess over the course of the year after we put the podcast on hold, his opinions may have shifted a little bit. And I don't know. I mean, I think he still says he's pro-Palestinian, but a lot of people, this is a very tense situation, right? It's a very polarizing situation.
Anti-Semitism is on the rise. And if you see that and you feel like people are, you know, falsely saying that you're a Zionist over and over again. I think that your attitude changes over. You become more negatively polarized. And I suspect that that's what happened. I haven't kept in touch with him. And I think that process let him down, you know, assuming that a lot of these people that were extremely critical of Israel were actually simply doing it for an anti-Semitic position. And he even...
went so far as to say that I believe he didn't say that I was antisemitic, but he said that I was fostering antisemitism in my community. And I think that's... ridiculous and and and very damaging smear but also a very ridiculous one because um
My commentary has always been against antisemitism. I always make the distinction that anti-Zionism is not antisemitism. I'm understanding that there are people who are... anti-israel and also anti-semitic at the same time but these are not progressive people and i never give them any space to um to present this this false reality because i also don't agree with it i don't think that israel's actions have anything to do with judaism whatsoever so um
In spite of all that, I think Ethan went on this crusade over the past month leading up to the election where he falsely claimed that Twitch was anti-Semitic. He said that... the CEO was like a Klansman and that, um, and a whole bunch of other stuff. And, and he, he became a part of this, uh, this, this bad faith smear campaign that I was talking about.
Well, you're speaking to the fact that the idea of a United States feels pretty, pretty distant. But in terms of unifying the Democratic Party enough behind. a platform that can actually win campaigns. How are you thinking about that? And are you thinking about ways that you might need to change strategy? in order to accomplish that, given what happened in this election? Yeah, I mean, the things that I've been advocating for for the past decade have not changed.
Which is why I can always go back to my commentary from like 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, like YouTube videos that I made and the things that I wrote way back then. And unfortunately, the problems still persist. whether it's a you know american foreign policy being ultimately damaging to the world or whether it be an advocacy for uh enshrining abortion rights in the constitution uh gun control like reasonable gun safety measures that must be implemented
focusing on universal healthcare and free college education. All of these things have not improved at all, which is why I don't think I need to change much in terms of my commentary, but I guess like as far as my methods as well. I need to, I think, focus a little bit more on broadening my outreach to the best of my ability. Now that it's not, now that I'm not.
super uh focused on on on doing eight full hours of political commentary i'll try to do more of that and and collaborate with content creators that i uh that i am not uh you know, directly aligned with politically even, and try to present my worldview to them in a palatable fashion.
and to their audiences as well. But that's something that I've already been doing. So I'm just going to continue doing that a little bit more, I guess. But like I said, I'm one person. I have a relatively sizable community. From what I understand, it's actually... As far as the key demo goes, it's closer to the Fox News audience than any of the other liberal outlets like CNN or MSNBC that have been hemorrhaging their viewers from the 25 to 54.
uh category uh and and i do have a much larger audience in the 18 to 35 demographic than all of those uh news networks combined um but still i'm one person And the media ecosystem is vast and there is a lot of different opinions. And I will just try to continue navigating this space to the best of my ability and try to convince people. that you can be just a cool person, a chill person that isn't.
constantly thinking about, you know, undocumented immigrants doing crimes when the data shows the exact opposite of the reality that the Republicans have presented, which is... that undocumented immigrants actually are responsible for less crime per capita than natural-born U.S. citizens are, and that they're not killing 100,000 Americans a year in the way that Trump presented, and that these are all simple distractions.
And hyper focusing on people like trans people or undocumented immigrants is not a successful way to address the problem. That was streamer and political commentator Hassan Piker. Our interview with Hassan was produced by Grace Tatter, mix and sound design for this episode by Paul Vykus. We'll be back in the feed on Friday, y'all. See you then.