#106 Why is WiFi so Uniquely Harmful?

That's 10 times more engagement than any paper I've ever written thus far , and that's in only one week . I'll tell you what guys . This one touched a nerve . This is resonating with people . So here's a little teaser . I'm going to play for you two similar sounds . One of these sounds is from today . The other was recorded during the Cold War .

So when I heard the modern sound , it transported me back in time to the Cold War period . When I heard the second sound , intriguing , right . Much to discuss . Guys , buckle up . This is a big one . I apologize for being a little bit late in my publication this week , but this podcast has a lot of moving parts to it .

We're going to be referencing other recorded materials from other interviews and whatnot . So , like I say , much to discuss , buckle up . Why is Wi-Fi so uniquely harmful ? Coming up Now , this is going to come as absolutely no surprise at all , but I loathe Wi-Fi . No , I don't love it , I loathe it .

I hate it For what it has stolen from my clients their health , peace , livelihoods and , arguably , their lives . I loathe it because it divides us , turning places of work , worship and dwelling into uninhabitable wastelands .

I loathe it for its insidious power to lure people unknowingly into a life forever marked by electrical sensitivity and for how it recruits the unaware , useful idiots into harming not only themselves but those around them , deepening the tragedy of this unseen force .

Why is Wi-Fi so often named as the cause of a shattering of health and vitality among my clients and fellow sufferers ? What exactly is it about Wi-Fi that seems so incompatible with life ? Why , despite the knowledge of harm , do we continue to accept and expect it everywhere ? And what are the solutions ?

Of course , in simplest terms , Wi-Fi exposure equates to radiofrequency radiation exposure . That's obvious . But the potential harm seems far out of proportion to what might be expected , given the measured intensity of exposure .

Transported by sound to the distant past , a familiar sound like a song or a voice can instantly transport you back to a moment long forgotten , bringing with it vivid memories and emotions . The first time I heard Wi-Fi , I was transported back to the 70s . I remembered that sound . Why , I wondered , am I hearing the Russian woodpecker ?

That's right , russian woodpecker On this radio frequency radiation meter ? As someone who suffered for decades from the reckless spread of harmful man-made radiofrequency radiation and helped many through their trials as well , I've developed a profound appreciation for the uniquely destructive force that we know as Wi-Fi .

Now , as you know , I'm not a professional scientist , a researcher , doctor I wouldn't want to be , but you know what I'm not without experience . So I want to share some of my thoughts on why I believe Wi-Fi is so uniquely harmful , and I believe there are at least four unique types of harm from Wi-Fi radiation exposure .

First of all , the radio frequency radiation exposure itself . Second , what I would call a multiplier effect , just from the pulse modulated RF carrying the data . Modulated RF carrying the data , the 10 Hz modulated extreme low frequency effect on the brain , disrupting natural rhythms and the Wi-Fi memory effect outside the brain , captured trauma within the body's tissues .

Rf radiation infare , the Moscow Embassy Affair Perhaps the first act of warfare using radiofrequency radiation was the so-called Moscow Embassy Affair , long before the woodpecker , which we'll discuss in a moment . First , I want to point out the depth and breadth of knowledge about causing harm with RF radiation that existed well before the woodpecker came into play .

Here's what happened in Moscow From the 1950s yeah , that's right . From the 1950s to the 1950s . Yeah , that's right . From the 1950s to the 70s , the US Embassy in Moscow was bombarded by low-level microwave RF radiation . Guess what folks ? It was below what is considered to be safe levels of exposure .

You got that Way back in the 50s and this became known as the Moscow Embassy Affair . At the end of the broadcast I'll tell you a book you can get to read more about it . This covert operation targeted embassy staff , exposing them to RF radiation at frequencies well below the thermal threshold . Yet the long-term effects were profound .

It raised alarms within US intelligence and spurned decades of research into the biological impacts of non-ionizing radiation , uncovering links to cognitive impairments , illness and psychological effects . The lesson from the Moscow embassy affair is clear .

The harmful potential of RF radiation has been known for over 70 years and the technology to exploit it has only become more sophisticated . Wi-fi and all the modern proliferation of Wi-Fi devices may seem benign , but the depth of what we know about the risks and what we choose to ignore runs far deeper than most realize .

Hearing Wi-Fi let's start with hearing Wi-Fi . When an RF meter has audio capability , it has a sound demodulation feature or audio output capability . This feature allows the meter to translate the detected RF signals into audible sound , helping users distinguish different RF sources based on the sound pattern emitted .

It's beneficial for identifying the nature of the RF signals , such as Wi-Fi , cell towers or other sources , through audio feedback . Now I'll explain what the Russian woodpecker is in a moment , but first here's an example of what I heard the first time I experienced through my meter's sound modulation feature .

That's the way you can hear RF radiation in your environment today , with a historical recording of the woodpecker from the so-called Cold War , and we'll discuss why the similarities in the sounds between the Wi-Fi and the woodpecker are significant in a moment . All right , so let's take a listen to the sound . Here we go .

I'm going to be playing for you two different recordings . The first is a modern recording what a Wi-Fi router sounds like . As heard through a modern radio frequency radiation meter . Wi-fi sounds like this . Now , the second recording is a historical recording from the time of the so-called Cold War .

It's a transmission from the former Soviet Union from a project they knew as Duga . It was nicknamed in the US as the Russian Woodpecker . So through a shortwave radio , duga or the Woodpecker sounds like this . Do you notice the similarity ? Now I'll play Wi-Fi , followed by the woodpecker . Once again , here's Wi-Fi and now the historical recording of the woodpecker .

All right , so we need to talk a little bit about what exactly is Wi-Fi ? Of course it's everywhere . You get a side order of Wi-Fi radiation with every cup of coffee at almost every coffee shop in the nation , with every cup of coffee at almost every coffee shop in the nation . It's in almost every business and home .

So the reasonable question to ask is where did it come from ? Our good old friends at the IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers , who supported and promoted the narrative that non-thermal effects are not scientifically substantiated and helped engineer the absurd SAR-based testing , were the same folks who enabled the introduction of Wi-Fi in 1997 .

The IEEE's 802.11 committee developed the initial standards for wireless local area networks , which paved the way for the commercial release of Wi-Fi . Despite ongoing concerns about potential non-thermal biological effects , the IEEE focused solely on thermal effects .

In its safety guidelines it asserts that as long as specific absorption rate or SAR levels remain below thresholds for tissue heating , wi-fi and similar technologies were safe . This stance has remained a cornerstone of wireless safety standards , shaping how devices are tested and regulated . Thanks , ieee .

With Wi-Fi , there are two separate modulated radiation emissions one for the beacon , which continuously projects RF radiation , and one for the data which projects additional RF radiation . The beacon , that hammering sound , the click , click , click , click . Some people describe it as a helicopter sound of a Wi-Fi's beacon .

It isn't the sound of data being sent from one device to another . That's in addition , on top of the constant hammering . The hammering is called a beacon , the beacon pulsing steadily at 10 impulses per second in the extreme low frequency range . It never stops . Second , in the extreme low frequency range , it never stops .

When you have Wi-Fi service , you're exposed not only to whatever the frequency of the radio frequency radiation , but also to this unique frequency of 10 hertz . So here's how that works Through pulse-width modulation . That's like turning on and off the fire hose of RF radiation .

A high-frequency RF emission can mimic a lower-frequency emission by controlling the duration of the pulses , creating an effect that simulates the behavior of the low frequency while maintaining the original high frequency carrier .

So , for example , a 2.4 GHz stream of RF radiation can be turned on and off at specific intervals , in this example , 10 times a second , generating both the 2.4 gigahertz carrier emission and a 10 hertz pulsed phenomenon that's that tap , tap , tap , tap that you're hearing Effectively embedding the lower frequency within the high frequency emission .

Did y'all know that such a thing was possible ? Here's the thing . From a technical standpoint , there's no need for the beacon For Wi-Fi to offer location-independent connectivity . That's all it does , by the way , freeing you from using a wire to connect your devices . It doesn't need the constant beacon to function .

The beacon creates an unnecessary and persistent exposure to radio frequency radiation of both the carrier frequency and the 10 Hz phenomenon . Why am I concerned about an ELF phenomenon at 10 Hz ?

Well , frequencies in the extreme low frequency or ELF range , especially around 10 Hz , can interact with biological systems and , in particular , brain waves , which naturally oscillate at a similar frequency , such as alpha waves . This raises concerns about potential neurological or physiological effects .

Unnecessary constant exposure to both the radiation from the beacon's carrier wave plus the embedded 10 Hz modulation . Check Data transmission . Wi-fi transmits data through modulated RF radiation in specific ISM bands . The radiation is emitted in bursts , with each burst containing encoded data packets .

As data is sent , both the router and receiving device emit radiation , while continuously exchanging additional radiation to verify packet integrity . This process results in an undulating emission of RF radiation from both devices throughout the communication session , regardless of data size or speed .

The highest exposures occur closest to the transmitting devices and the routers , but RF radiation permeates the entire environment , extending far beyond the transmission and reception points . Constant radiation emission from the beacon , additional radiation emission with a different modulation scheme . On data transfer .

Check as an important aside , high definition or HD multiplies these emissions dramatically , since HD content , like 4K video , requires significantly more bandwidth and frequent packet transfers . So , for example , a 360p video requires about one half of a megabit per second , while a 4K video can demand up to 25 megabits per second or more . That's a 50-fold increase .

This increased data throughput results in much more frequent and sustained bursts of RF radiation , significantly increasing emissions during streaming or high-definition activities . If you're still using wireless , you may want to turn down the video or audio resolution as an immediate method of reducing exposure .

About that woodpecker here is the official story on Duga , what Americans nickname the Russian woodpecker . In Russian , the word Duga means arc or curve , but in the electrical sense it specifically refers to an electrical arc describing the curved path of an electrical discharge between two points .

The Duga project , we are told , was a Soviet over-the-horizon radar system used during the Cold War that operated on a broad range of frequencies emitting RF radiation in a pulsed manner .

When demodulated on a short wave set where I first heard the sound by the way , in the 70s it sounded like a repetitive tapping noise 10 Hz that many could hear across the globe . When tuning into active frequencies , the phenomenon was dubbed the Russian woodpecker because of its sound .

The effect of Duga was pulse-modulated RF radiation projected over a variety of frequencies , primarily aimed at North America . The Duga radar system was massive , with its primary antenna stretching over 700 meters long and 150 meters tall , that's approaching two football fields high .

It operated at incredible power levels , arguably up to 10 megawatts , 10 million watts , and ironically I think one millionth of one watt is too much . The primary Duga antenna near Chernobyl stopped broadcasting in 1986 , the same year as the Chernobyl nuclear disaster . Some years later , the modern plague of Wi-Fi began to spread .

First hundreds , then thousands , then millions of smaller sources of 10 hertz pulse modulated radio frequency radiation had been traded for the single source from the big antennas Wi-Fi More RF than the woodpecker . But here's the thing the inverse square law , which tells us that radiation intensity decreases rapidly with distance , offers no comfort here .

While Duga's powerful signal diminished over long distances , the countless Wi-Fi routers and devices are right in our homes , workplaces and public spaces , mere feet or inches from our bodies . Each router's radiation may be lower in power than Duga , but it's much closer , meaning that exposure levels are much higher .

Instead of one distant , massive source , we now face an omnipresent web of close-range pulse-modulated RF radiation . The Internet of Things is madness , the madness of IoT . The Internet of Things will multiply this exposure exponentially .

With every new smart device , from refrigerators to light bulbs to security cameras , we introduce yet another source of 10 hertz pulse modulated radio frequency radiation into our environments . These devices , constantly connected and communicating , add to the already overwhelming burden of Wi-Fi , saturating our living spaces with radiation that is difficult to avoid .

Unlike the days of Duga , where one could move far away or find a sheltered space , the Internet of Things creates a situation where escape becomes much more difficult . Each device may emit at lower power , but the sheer number of sources , combined with their proximity , ensures the exposure is constant and cumulative . Potential cognitive effects of 10 Hz ELF exposure .

So what is my fascination with a 10 Hz signal embedded within the stream of RF radiation ? Entrainment , the reality of a frequency following effect . The human brain operates within a range of frequencies , with different brainwave states corresponding to specific activities .

The average state varies depending on what we're doing , but its default state is governed by the Schumann resonance , a natural frequency of around 7.83 Hz that the Earth's electromagnetic field generates . However , the brain can shift toward that frequency in the presence of a persistent 10 Hz signal .

The process of entrainment means that the brain , instead of maintaining its natural rhythm , follows the external signal . Over time , this can lead to a potentially significant disruption in brain function , as the constant exposure to Wi-Fi's 10 Hz pulses pushes the brain into an unnatural rhythm , overriding its connection to the Earth's natural frequency . So the brain ?

It's your only source of reference for reality , right ? If the brain itself is being altered ? If the brain itself is being altered , your perception of what's happening is also altered . It's like trying to judge the stability of a ship , for example , while standing on it in a rough sea . Your perspective is skewed .

This entrainment effect over time could create a state where you're more easily influenced , a suggestible state . In this state , the brain is more receptive to external input , whether it's media , marketing or even subconscious influences . With Wi-Fi and other sources of 10 hertz modulation becoming increasingly pervasive .

Becoming increasingly pervasive , these signals may be subtly altering how we think and respond , without us even realizing it .

We're talking about the possibility of mind control and I'm not talking about the Hollywood sense but in creating an internal state different from the natural state of consciousness , in which we're involuntarily shifted from our natural connection to the earth towards an unnatural , more suggestible rhythm .

This shift , brought about by constant exposure to the 10 Hz Wi-Fi beacon modulation , subtly alters our brain's natural rhythms . Instead of being attuned to the Schumann resonance , we're pulled into synchronization with a synthetic rhythm , a state of consciousness that feels normal but is actually disconnected from our natural state .

In this altered state , our thoughts , emotions and perceptions may be more easily influenced by the artificial environment around us as we become entrained to its frequencies .

Traumatic Memories Stored Outside the Brain theorizes that constant exposure to Wi-Fi's pulse signals , particularly its 10 Hz modulation , leaves a lasting imprint not just on the brain but throughout the body . This memory is thought to be stored in the structured water that makes up a significant portion of the body's tissues .

Structured water , believed to hold information and maintain coherence , could act as a medium for retaining artificial frequencies even after the radiation source is removed . In this theory , the body continues to resonate at the artificial 10 Hz frequency , much like an echo that persists long after the sound has stopped .

This could explain why some individuals continue to experience electromagnetic sensitivity or cognitive disruption symptoms , as the structured water in their bodies retains the influence of these synthetic rhythms , preventing a return to their natural state . This memory effect can affect even the tiny portion of the population with a home that prevents wireless trespass of Wi-Fi .

Even in meticulously shielded environments where Wi-Fi and other sources of RF radiation are kept out , the body may continue to resonate with artificial frequencies it was previously exposed to . The structured water throughout the body , which retains the memory of these frequencies , may cause lingering effects long after the initial exposure .

This means that even in environments free from ongoing wireless intrusion , individuals could still experience symptoms of electromagnetic sensitivity as their bodies hold onto the disruptive patterns embedded by previous Wi-Fi exposure . This phenomenon may explain why electromagnetic poisoning victims you can call them EHS if you want get stuck in a chronic state of dysautonomia .

Dysautonomia an autonomic nervous system dysfunction often involves an imbalance between the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches , commonly called the fight-or-flight and rest-and-digest responses . Constant exposure to pulse-modulated RF radiation like Wi-Fi may lock the body in a heightened sympathetic state , perpetuating a chronic fight-or-flight response .

Even after removing wireless radiation sources , the body continues to resonate with these artificial frequencies through the memory effect stored in its structured water . This prevents a return to the parasympathetic dominance where healing and recovery occur , trapping the individual in constant physiological stress .

This imbalance could explain why many EHS victims struggle to recover as their bodies remain wired for stress Long after the environmental exposure has been mitigated . The Tuning Fork Method a potential aid for recovery in RF exclusion zones . I'll just add parenthetically here that this is super exciting .

I have some people who have access to pristine living places and we've all been experimenting with the tuning fork . So far it looks pretty darn exciting . All right , continuing . For those who do have access to an RF exclusion zone , the tuning fork method by Dr Christophe Pl Flotte may help encourage your body to return to normal function more quickly .

I'm not promoting Tuning Fork use in general , nor the idea that your life will be fine if you continue living in a toxic environment with occasional exposure to the Tuning Fork . In a toxic environment with occasional exposure to the tuning fork . Instead , I'm suggesting that if you have access to an exclusion zone to recover .

You may want to try the fork as a potential aid in rebalancing your system . The tuning fork's ability to restore natural frequencies could assist in resetting your body's rhythms after prolonged exposure to pulse-modulated RF radiation , helping to accelerate the return .

You a segment of my interview with Dr Christophe Ploté where he's going to be talking about the tuning fork technique and a lot more than that . So clinical observations he's made , etc . So here comes a discussion . It's from a recent interview I had of Dr Christoph Ploté . Take a listen .

Try to do that and watch your tongue and if you've been exposed to EMF which 99.9% of all viewers will have during the day they will see a trembling of the tongue . They can't really hold the tongue still anymore , and this is because of the high activation of the central nervous system , because it's a cranial nerve that supplies actually the tongue .

So the more exposure to EMF you've had during the day , the more this tongue will be almost uncontrollable . If we're now at a place like yours , you stick out the tongue , look in the mirror . You can actually still see the tongue in a resting state . If you're in a city or if children come from school , sometimes their tongue is going like this .

Yeah , so that's the one thing I show people . If you want to assess quantitatively . I never did a study about it , but I hope one day we don't only have to rely on studies but also on clinical experience to look into certain topics , because otherwise it will take years and years . You know , the NTP study took 19 years to be finally over . We can't wait .

So that's why I'm putting this out here at the moment . This is a personal experience , it's like a personal observational study . And the second thing is that there is a scientist in Germany , professor von Klitzing .

He's in Berlin and he does experiments with putting people in a Faraday cage , so where no EMF interference from the inside or the outside can occur , and then activates a Wi-Fi router and then he looks at specific criteria .

He looks at an EEG brain function , at an EMG muscle tone , he looks at an ECG the heart , and he looks also at the circulation and he found not in all , and in some more in the heart and with others more in the brain , with others more in the muscle tone .

He found significant changes and sometimes even asystolic periods when he turned on the Wi-Fi router in the back of a few seconds , so the heart stopped beating for a few seconds . So he found all of this . He tried to publish it and he has been a renowned scientist who published in many very prestigious journals but nobody wanted to publish his work .

Prestigious journals but nobody wanted to publish his work . So he also coined the term a Wi-Fi memory effect , and this is the one thing that I find in practice every day .

So I put people on the couch supine and I'll ask them to have their knees in 90 degrees on the on the table , if you can imagine , and then I rotate the hip and in modern times , because of the increased muscle tone that people are experiencing , the average hip doesn't really rotate much more than 30 degrees , whilst it should be 80 to 90 degrees .

So this I'm treating professional athletes , soccer players and from other specialities in Germany I see this even in really really super fit athletes that they literally are stiff , yeah , so why am I correlating this to EMF and how can I convince people that actually they can correlate themselves that with it ? I use a tuning fork .

Yeah , if I can start me with that , so that's a tuning fork . Yeah , if I can start maybe with that , so that's a tuning fork . We tested , um , a lot of them . That's 136.1 hertz . So , um , the , the , the , the longer the uh , the deeper the frequency , the more effect .

It will have to break the resonance with the Wi-Fi router , the mobile phone that you might have used a few hours beforehand , because the Wi-Fi memory effect indicates that even if you've only been exposed to about 30 minutes with a Wi-Fi router , your cells might still vibrate in the 10 Hz frequency of the Wi-Fi router for up to two days .

He just put an oscilloscope , just saw the resonance with it , and this is one thing why I'm very adamant that nobody nowadays can escape the effects . I had a conversation today with somebody who lives during the night in a cage , has built a huge cage under his house and sleeps very , very well there , which I can understand .

But the thing is he still has to disconnect from the frequencies that he encountered during the day . So what we do ? We just get them . Yeah , I can put , maybe you can hear the frequency . So we put the frequency on the osseous structures , on the bones of the skull , on the chest chest bone .

We put them on the knees and on the ankles Anybody can do that and it's like shaking your system out of the resonance with the Wi-Fi or the mobile phone . We have children that fall asleep here in the practice because we have no mobile phones or no Wi-Fi . We have children that fall asleep here in the practice because we have no mobile phones or no Wi-Fi .

We have nothing and we ask all patients to turn off their mobile devices if they enter the practice . So people lie down there . And another symptom that people experience nowadays are these muscle twitches .

They're almost like fasciculations , what they call them in medical terms little switches that you see all over their body , and sometimes you have these people that have it with their eyes .

Then they get investigated for a tick In every school class nowadays I have at least five school kids that have these ticks , sometimes with their head or sometimes just with their eyes .

And if you do the tuning fork and you ask them a few measures that you so beautifully sum up what people can do in order to reduce their radiation at home , so I guess every viewer that watches this here knows about your activities .

Yeah , if you implement all of this and you are not unfortunate that somebody put a 5G tower just in front of your house or anything like it , then you're able to reduce all of these signs . So your tongue just remains very intact and doesn't fasciculate and doesn't tremble all the time .

You get very relaxed because your autonomic nervous system will react to that as well . It will really de-stress you . And the other thing is you can see it in the muscle tone . If you do that with a tuning fork , the children then will have all of a sudden 90 degree rotation of their hips again .

So that's one thing that helps a little bit to um to to convey the message that , yeah , there is an influence from an invisible , odorless , yet tasteless substance around them that's poisoning their body .

So I'll put uh , an affiliate link to a tuning fork , the . The tuning fork I found is just a company that I've dealt with in the past . If you can find one somewhere else , that's great . I think the frequency is what's important . So this method and access to an RF exclusion zone may provide additional benefits for resetting and recovering quickly .

This is not an endorsement for any and every use of tuning forks , just this specific idea potentially accelerating a return to normal upon return to a pristine environment . Pristine environment , social engineering . There is a social programming dimension to the normalization of personal and familial radiation exposures such as Wi-Fi .

That helps us understand how we got here . Please check out my Beyond Convenience , amusement and Stimulation . The blind adoption of Wi-Fi into our lives can be explained by a cultural and now deep-seated desire for convenience , amusement and stimulation , which pull us into a synthetic existence that undermines health and well-being that undermines health and well-being .

This unconscious expectation and surrender to the ideal of ubiquitous connectivity , which can only be delivered through RF , radiation-fueled wireless technology , disconnects us from the natural world , reinforcing harmful EMF exposures , while diverting us from meaningful , life-giving connections and experiences .

True transformation requires breaking free from these societal traps and mastering the mindset needed to prioritize natural life over synthetic life . Now two things to consider . I'm going to play here a segment of a recent interview that I had with Dave Stetzer . Dave traveled to the former Soviet Union and you're going to hear something amazing .

This is called All the Rats Died .

Then if we modulate it or change it , we can change it at an audio rate , for example . We can get you know or fm radio station , for example . But okay , so they did this research on these rats and nothing seemed to happen . They go well , gee , we know this stuff is bad , so , but it really didn't have seemed to bother them .

So one guy said , well , why don't we go ? This stuff is bad . But it really didn't seem to bother them . So one guy said , well , why don't we go ahead and modulate the signal ? In other words , let's pulse that wave . And when they did , within three minutes all the rats were dead . They didn't even have time to make notes . Okay , so now .

They modulated it , and once they modulated the signal , all the rats died within three minutes , so quickly , in fact , that the scientists didn't even have a chance to take notes . All right , so one other thing I would like you to consider , and this is from a recent interview as well . This is going to be with Patty Wood .

She's the executive director of Grassroots Environmental Education and they've come up with a number of projects . This is a subject of episode 100 , which was ceremonially devoted by me to the children . Of course , my 100th episode was special to me , so I wanted to do something very special with it . It was the interview with Patty .

They came up with the Baby Safe Project . What she's going to be discussing in this segment is talking about safe schools , keeping children safe from radio frequency radiation .

They're making this stuff illegal in other countries and yet we continue to expose our children . So I thought it was important to consider those two things . As you are listening to what I've presented in this podcast today and the paper that I wrote , solutions . Here's the thing . You can take action today , depending on your commitment level .

There are multiple ways to achieve measurable reductions in Wi-Fi radiation in your home . Whether you're not quite ready to completely move away from Wi-Fi , or you want it gone from your home , like right now , here are some proven tactics for every situation . So reduce Wi-Fi sources in your home . This is for people who are not ready for the divorce .

They think they still need it or they still want it in their home , for whatever reasons . Fine . Number one upgrade to a Wi-Fi router that eliminates the continuous beacon signal and reduces radiation intensity during data transfer .

These routers also offer features like adjustable transmission power , eco mode , minimizing EMF emissions when not in use , and you can combine this strategy with numbers 2 and 4 , which I'll talk about in a minute . If desired , I'll try to remember to put a link for that router in the discussion area .

Number two unplug your router when not in use , especially overnight . It can significantly . It will significantly reduce your exposure to Wi-Fi radiation , even if you leave Wi-Fi on during the day . Turning it off while you sleep reduces exposure by about a third without costing anything . This is free guys .

This simple step minimizes the constant emission of RF radiation from the router during times when internet access is not needed . Now a more convenient way to turn your Wi-Fi on and off is option three , and it is the remote control device available through Tech Wellness .

If you use this device , you can , from the other side of the room or from anywhere in your house , push a button and your wi-fi router goes on . When you're done , push the button again goes off . Cheap , easy , effective , 15 bucks . Number four you can further reduce Wi-Fi radiation exposure by turning off Wi-Fi on your devices when you're not actively using them .

This is really a key thing . If you turn off your router but not the Wi-Fi selection on your devices , you're still getting the Wi-Fi from your device , right . So this simple step lowers the amount of radiation your devices emit . Again , it's completely free . You just need to remember to do it .

Purchase an adequate RF meter this is number five and learn the basics of RF hygiene through a one-hour consult with me in order to locate other Wi-Fi sources in your home . Number six reducing audio and video resolution can lower data usage by up to 50 times , significantly decreasing RF radiation emissions .

This is because high-definition content , like 4K videos , or high-res audio requires much more bandwidth up to 25 megabits per second for 4K video , compared to around a half a megabit per second for a 360p . The higher the resolution , the more data bursts occur , both in frequency and overall volume , leading to increased RF radiation .

Lowering video or audio resolution is a simple , free and immediate way to reduce exposure . Now , if you're ready for the divorce , you don't want Wi-Fi in your life in your home at least . there are two options .

Number one , go from wireless to wired computing and I have a link there , and again it's Tech Wellness , and you can buy a kit and you can just replace the wireless router with one that's wired , eliminating 100% of Wi-Fi radiation from your router and your computer . Once it's installed , it's once and done .

Don't forget to turn off the Wi-Fi on your devices , but then you don't have to think about anything anymore in the future with regard to your router .

Or number two , purchase an adequate RF meter and learn the basics of RF hygiene through a one-hour consult , as I mentioned , in order to locate other Wi-Fi sources in your home , including so-called smart appliances .

And I've made an episode on that how arguably these Wi-Fi signals are being hidden from us and placed in our televisions , our refrigerators , our dishwashers , our stoves , etc . Last category in solutions eliminate or reduce Wi-Fi exposures from neighbors . One idea here set up a sleep sanctuary in your home , based on an RF shielded bed canopy .

I can coach you through the process of determining whether or not this strategy may work in your home . It may take several sessions , but here's how to start the process Contact me , schedule a one-hour consult and we'll get headed in that direction . So , in conclusion , wi-fi .

It's ubiquitous in modern life , saturating our homes , workplaces , public spaces with constant radiofrequency radiation . However , the harm it causes may extend far beyond the expected effects of measured RF intensity . So why is Wi-Fi so uniquely harmful ? At its core , wi-fi is more than just an RF emitter .

It introduces a complex set of additional stressors that amplify its impact . The continuous beacon signal , pulsing at 10 Hz , mimics the brainwave Frequencies that govern our natural rhythms , like alpha waves , raising concern about how this constant exposure could disrupt the brain's normal functioning .

In addition , the post-modulated nature of the RF transmission , carrying data , compounds the potential harm through a multiplier effect . That's my wording . These modulated emissions do not just affect the brain . They can leave an imprint on the body's tissue , creating lasting trauma stored in the structured water that composes much of the human body .

Unlike a single radiation source , today's Wi-Fi surrounds us from all sides , far closer to our bodies , making the risk of long-term exposure more dangerous . All these little Wi-Fi routers we have around are much worse than Duga guys .

The proliferation of Wi-Fi-enabled devices in the Internet of Things , or IoT , only worsens this problem , as each new device adds another layer of radiation to our already saturated environment . Unfortunately , many people useful idiots are actively and intentionally multiplying Wi-Fi emissions in their homes , unknowingly affecting the health of their families and their communities .

With Wi-Fi modulating at the same 10 Hz frequency embedded in its signals , our brainwaves may be altered in ways that lead to cognitive disruption , mood changes and even a greater susceptibility to influence . The effects of Wi-Fi are cumulative , and the more devices we surround ourselves with , the greater the risk .

While there are ways to shield oneself and recover , like creating true RF exclusion zones or using potential aids like tuning forks to help rebalance the body's rhythm , the best strategy is prevention . Reducing Wi-Fi exposure and recognizing its uniquely harmful nature is the first step towards reclaiming health and vitality in an increasingly wireless world .

Okay , so did I mention I've been wanting to write this paper for years , many years , paper for years , many years , and so I'm going to list for you some sources that I think will be helpful if you want to understand why I've come to these conclusions . So the DIA , the Defense Intelligence Agency , biological Effects from 1975 would be a good source .

Radiofrequency radiation neurological effect abstracts 2022 from the bio initiative report . The radiofrequency radiation research summary from the bio initiative report . Wi-fi is an important threat to Human Health by Dr Martin L Paul . Wi-fi Refugee Play to the Modern Day . Canary , shannon Rowan . Wi-fi Arguably Hidden in Modern Appliances . That's my own work from Substack .

The Zapping of America , paul Broder , is out of print . If you can find a copy , you should . You should read that . You'll learn how our ancestors protested vigorously about things like radar and you'll learn all about the story of the Moscow Embassy affair , as well as Duga Disconnect , a scientist's solution for safer technology by Dr Debra Davis .

So in particular , that exposes the flawed rationale promoted by the IEEE and others that non-thermal effects are not harmful . And , something very recent , improving fascia function for optimal health . Wise Traditions podcast number 493 with Alicia Celeste . Well , I hope this has been a blessing . I hope this has been a help for you .

So these are my thoughts on why , and I don't know . I don't know if I've captured all the potential different ways that Wi-Fi is harmful , but it gives us a lot to think about and I encourage you to do your own research on this and , if you need to , I'll understand if you want to re-listen to this , because there's a lot there . Keith Cutter emfremedycom .

See you next time .

It is not intended to be , nor does it constitute , healthcare or medical advice . Opinions of guests on this podcast do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the EMF Remedy Podcast .