Tesla Settles Case where passenger was burned alive - podcast episode cover

Tesla Settles Case where passenger was burned alive

Jun 01, 20247 min
--:--
--:--
Listen in podcast apps:
Metacast
Spotify
Youtube
RSS

Episode description

Tesla’s mounting legal troubles take a dramatic turn as the automaker settles another explosive lawsuit over a deadly crash. Discover the shocking details behind the fiery accidents, the alleged defects, and why Elon Musk’s vow to never settle is now under scrutiny. Is Tesla’s reputation at risk?

Transcript

Welcome back to the Elon Musk Podcast. This is a show where we discuss the critical crossroads, the shape SpaceX, Tesla X. The Boring Company and Neuralink. And I'm your host, Will Walden. Tesla has settled another case involving a fatal crash linked to alleged vehicle design defects, marking the second such

settlement this year. The case, filed in 2019, pertains to a 2016 incident where a test the vehicle reportedly accelerated uncontrollably in Indianapolis, colliding with a tree and then caught fire. This settlement follows a similar resolution in April regarding a fatal crash involving Tesla's Autopilot technology. Now, the lawsuit alleged that the 2015 Model S involved in the Indianapolis crash had a tendency to catch fire and a defective door latch system that

trapped the passenger inside. Now, the accident resulted in the deaths of both driver Casey Speckman, who was intoxicated, and the passenger Kevin McCarthy. Now, McCarthy's family claimed the defects prevented him from escaping from the burning vehicle. Now, Tesla has consistently denied any fault, attributing the crash to misuse or improper maintenance of the vehicle. And in its response, Tesla maintained that its cars meet

all relevant safety standards. This case's settlement indicates the shift from CEO Elon Musk's previous stance against settling what he termed unjust cases. Now, the recent settlements contrast with Musk's 2022 declaration on Twitter, where he vowed never to settle an unjust case even if it might result in a loss. And in April, Tesla settled another high profile lawsuit involving an Apple engineer who died when his Model X crashed while allegedly using Autopilot.

Now, these settlements suggested that Tesla may be more willing to resolve such cases out of court. Now, Tesla's legal battles extend beyond these two cases. The company faces numerous lawsuits across the country related to alleged defects causing serious or fatal accidents. At least eight pending lawsuits are scheduled for trial next year, many involving claims that crashes occurred while the driver relied on Tesla's

Autopilot technology. Federal regulators are also scrutinizing Tesla. The National Hwy. Traffic Safety Administration, or the NHTSA, is investigating whether Tesla's Autopilot system misleads drivers into believing it has more capabilities than it does. This regulatory attention adds pressure to test those legal challenges right now. And in the Indianapolis crash, the plaintiffs argued this Speckman lost control of the Model S when it suddenly accelerated while she tried to

avoid an oncoming vehicle. The car crashed into a tree and then a parking structure, bursting into flames. The witnesses reportedly saw McCarthy attempting to escape but being unable due to the vehicle's design defects. Now, Tesla has faced multiple complaints regarding fires allegedly linked to its batteries. Experts know that electric vehicle batteries can burn more intensely and for longer durations than internal

combustion engines. This has raised concerns about the safety of Tesla's battery design and in the lawsuit, McCarthy's family detailed how he could not escape due to the post crash fire and the defective door latch system. Tesla, however, encountered that their vehicles are state-of-the-art and comply with all safety regulations denying any defect in the door latch system now.

Separately, Speckman's family filed a lawsuit against Tesla in 2019. After Tesla's attempt to dismiss the case was denied in February 2023, a settlement was reached two months later. The specifics of the settlement remain confidential now. The settlement with McCarthy's family was announced just days before the trial was set to begin. Court records describe it as conditional, but no further details have been provided.

Neither Tesla nor the McCarthy family's lawyers have commented on the settlement, and in previous cases involving Tesla's Autopilot, the company has had mixed results, and two California trials juries concluded that driver error, not the technology, was to blame for the accidents.

These outcome support must claim the Tesla vehicles are among the safest on the road, and the case involving the Apple engineer, who died in 2018 when his Model X crashed into a highway barrier, was particularly contentious. The engineer's family argued that Tesla's Autopilot system was faulty. The confidential settlement recent April avoided a potentially lengthy and costly trial for Tesla. Now, despite the legal challenges, Tesla continues to defend its vehicle safety.

The company points to its rigorous safety standards and compliance with government regulations. However, the increasing number of lawsuits and settlements suggest a growing concern over Tesla's vehicle design and safety features. The settlements and ongoing lawsuits could have implications for Tesla's public image and financial performance. And investors and customers alike are watching how the company navigates these legal

challenges right now. And Tesla's ability to maintain its reputation as a leading innovator in the EV market may hinge on the outcomes of these cases. Now, while Tesla faces more lawsuits in the future designing and doing the Autopilot tech, the company's legal strategy will be under scrutiny as well. The decisions to settle recent cases indicate a possible shift in approach, potentially aiming to minimize public trials and adverse publicity.

Regulatory scrutiny, particularly the NHTSA, could lead to further changes in how Tesla designs and markets its vehicles. Any findings from ongoing investigations might result in recalls or modifications to existing safety features impacting Tesla's operations now. The outcomes of these cases will likely influence future litigation involving Tesla. If more plaintiffs succeed in their claims, Tesla could face increased legal costs and pressure to enhance its vehicle

safety standards. Conversely, favorable rulings for Tesla could reinforce its stance on the safety and the reliability of its vehicles. Hey, thank. You so much for listening today. I really do appreciate your support. If you could take a second and hit the subscribe or the follow button on whatever podcast platform that you're listening on right now, I greatly appreciate it. It helps out the show tremendously and you'll never miss an episode.

And each. Episode is about 10 minutes or less to get you caught up quickly. And please, if you want to support the show even more, go to patreon.com/stage Zero and please take care of yourselves and each other and I'll see you tomorrow.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android
Open in Metacast