Hey everybody. Welcome back to the Elon Musk podcast This. Is a show where we discuss the critical crossroads that shape SpaceX. Tesla X, The Boring Company and Neurolink I'm your. Host will. Walden. A federal jury in Miami ordered Tesla to pay 43, excuse me, $243 million last month after a 2019 crash in Florida killed 22 year old Nabel Benavides Leon and left her boyfriend Dylan Angelo
with life changing injuries. Of the verdict hanged on a single file that Tesla said did not exist until a hacker found it inside a Starbucks. How did Tesla lose critical crash data tied to its own Autopilot system, then claim it didn't exist, only to have it recovered by a third party years later? A hacker. Now this raises doubts about how Tesla stores, retrieves, and controls access to information that can make or break lawsuits about its driver assistance features.
Tesla denied withholding the file and said it couldn't locate it. But the jury didn't buy that explanation, especially after the plaintiff's team proved the data had been on Tesla servers all along. Now, the crash occurred on April 25th, 2019 in Key Largo. George McGee was driving a Tesla Model S on Autopilot when he looked away from the road to pick up his dropped phone. Car slammed into Anglo's truck, parked at the end of a dark Rd.
where Anglo and Benavides Leon stood behind hazard reflectors. McGee later settled separately, admitting he was using Autopilot at the time. But the civil lawsuit targeted Tesla, accusing the company of negligence for allowing Autopilot to operate on that road and for failing to alert the driver of the situation. Now, Tesla told the court didn't have the collision snapshot, which is a key internal data file that logs exactly what the vehicle saw, sensed and planned
in the moments before a crash. Plaintiffs believed it would show that the car failed to detect the couple, failed to warn the driver and proceeded with a deadly maneuver. Tesla eventually said it had simply missed the file.
In reality, a hacker known online as Green The only found it. That discovery happened inside of Miami Starbucks. The hacker, who had spent years reverse engineering Tesla's hardware, ran a forensic image of the vehicle's Autopilot controlling unit on his laptop and found the deleted file within minutes. He also found evidence that Tesla had received the data moments after the crash, meaning the company had a copy from the start and test to confirm this in court.
Calling oversight clumsy but denied any intent to deceive. Now, the Miami jury didn't need long to deliberate and ruled that Tesla was 33% liable for the crash and ordered the company to pay damages. The remaining responsibility fell on the driver. The plaintiffs attorneys argued that Tesla misled investigators and withheld access to vital evidence for years. They said Tesla attempted to settle quietly before trial, but the family wanted the truth
public now. Court records reveal the data had indeed been uploaded to Tesla servers automatically after the crash, but according to internal testimony, it was then unlinked test, the standard protocol for separating vehicle
data from specific incidents. Later, an engineer testified that someone had likely taken affirmative action to delete the central server copy as well, although the court found no evidence this was intentional, and the judge ordered Tesla to reimburse the plaintiffs for costs related to data recovery now. That effort to recover the data began years later, when Florida Highway Patrol turned over the original Autopilot unit to the plaintiff's team.
The hacker flown in by the legal team warned against Tesla's request to boot up the unit, saying it could trigger automatic updates that would overwrite the file. Instead, he extracted the contents himself. What he found was exactly what the family had been looking for, a complete record of what the Tesla saw as it speed toward the victims. By using that data, the hacker generated A detailed augmented video for the courtroom.
Frame by frame. It showed the Tesla detecting a car and then a pedestrian, yet continuing to plan a path straight through their location. Tesla argued the video proved the driver had enough time to react, and the Plano said it confirmed the system failed at every critical moment. Tesla's legal team framed the situation as an honest mistake. His lawyer told jurors the company would never hide helpful evidence, simply didn't realize the file had been preserved.
The plaintiff's attorneys described a pattern of obstruction, arguing that Tesla had evidence before the cops even arrived on the scene and only admitted to having it after they found another way to retrieve it. Now, this was not Tesla's first trial involving Autopilot, but it may be the most consequential. The $240 million verdict marked the company's largest public loss over its driver assistance tech to date.
Within weeks, investors filed a lawsuit in Texas accusing Tesla of misleading the market about the safety and reliability of its systems, citing the Miami case. Other families are now preparing similar claims, including one in California tied to the death of a 15 year old. Federal regulators have repeatedly investigated Tesla over Autopilot, and the system has been involved in dozens of
crashes, many fatal. Tesla has beaten two such lawsuits in the past and settled others before they reach trial. But the Miami case added new pressure, producing internal records, engineer testimony and digital files that other plaintiffs will now use to build their own cases. One example is attorney Mark Dobin, who recently what a refund for the $10,600 he paid for Full Self Driving Software after an arbiter ruled Tesla never delivered the promise
features. He said Musk Musk's public claims had created unrealistic expectations, and the Miami case showed what happens when the confidence turns deadly. Tesla has declined us to comment on the outcome, except to say it plans to appeal. A judge said she did not find enough evidence that Tesla deliberately destroyed or withheld the data, but she agreed the company had mishandled it and ordered reimbursement of the cost incurred by the plaintiffs to retrieve it.
The hacker who helped find the data says future cases may not be so lucky. Tesla has since tightened its security protocols, making it harder for independent analysts to access internal crash data. Now they believe that's part of the problem sometimes, he said. You just have to get the data out. Hey, thank you so much for listening today. I really do appreciate your
support. If you could take a second and hit this subscribe or the follow button on whatever podcast platform that you're listening on. Right. Now I greatly appreciate it. It helps out the show tremendously and you'll never miss an episode. And each episode is about 10 minutes or less to get you caught up quickly. And please, if you want to support the show even more, go to. Atreoncom Stage 0. And please take care of yourselves and each other, and I'll see you tomorrow.