The NHTSA just handed Tesla five more weeks to explain why its cars keep running red lights. The federal safety agency extended Tesla's deadline to respond to any investigation into full self driving traffic violations until February 23rd, giving the company time to manually review 8313 records of potential incidents. And Tesla says it can only process about 300 records per day. In the original January 19th deadline landed right in the
middle of a holiday. But this extension arrives at a precarious moment for the automaker. Elon Musk announced 2 days ago that Tesla will stop selling FSD as a one time purchase after February 14th, forcing all new customers between $99 monthly subscription. Now, is that date a coincidence, or is Tesla quietly repositioning its most controversial product before
regulators close in? The February 14th deadline is the same day California's DMV gave Tesla to fix its misleading Autopilot marketing or face a 30 day sales suspension. We're going to go and breakdown what NHTSA is actually investigating, why Tesla is drowning in regulatory requests, and how the subscription pivot might be a legal hedge as much
as a business strategy. We will also look at why only 12% of Tesla owners have ever paid for FSD, what that means for Musk's robotaxi, and we'll get right into that right after this very short break. Now, the federal investigation into FSD traffic violations now covers 2.9 million Tesla vehicles, essentially every car equipped with a system now.
NHTSA opened the probe in October after collecting dozens of reports of Teslas running red lights, driving in the wrong direction, and making illegal lane changes while FSD was engaged. The agency has since logged 62 customer complaints, 14 Tesla submitted reports and four media accounts of incidents. Some drivers reported their cars gave no warning before behaving erratically. Tesla's defense has remained consistent.
They say that the company argues it has repeatedly told drivers the system cannot drive cars by themselves. Whoever sits behind the wheel must remain attentive and ready to intervene at all times. Now, that language appears in Tesla's documentation and owner manuals. The company classifieds FSD as an SAE Level 2 partial automation system, meaning the driver retains full responsibility for operating the vehicle and complying with
traffic laws at all times. But let's point out that the product name is Full Self Driving. Calling something Full Self Driving when it requires constant given supervision creates a perception gap that regulators find increasingly problematic. California's DMV ruled last month that Tesla's marketing was deceptive under state law, concluding that reasonable consumers can mistakenly believe that cars can operate all by themselves without human oversight.
Administrative Judge Juliet Cox found that Tesla's promotional language implied levels of autonomous capabilities the cars simply cannot do, and they cannot possess this now. The investigation centers on specific failure modes that put drivers and other road users at risk. NHTSA documents describe Tesla's entering turn only lanes and proceeding straight through intersections in violation of
lane markings. Others executed turns from through lanes despite clear directional signals and peanut arrows. Some vehicles changed lanes directly into opposing traffic with minimal notice to drivers, creating immediate collision hazards. One pattern emerged from a cluster of complaints in Joppa, MD, where multiple drivers reported the same intersection
triggered erratic behavior. Tesla claims it has since addressed the issue at that specific location, but the geographic spread of other incidents suggests systemic problems rather than isolated bugs. The agency is particularly interested in whether FSD provides adequate warnings before these maneuvers, and many incident reports suggest the system acted without alerting the driver to its intended behavior, leaving no time for
the driver to intervene. Tesla requested the extension on January 12th, explaining that the original deadline gave it barely over a month to compile comprehensive data. The company told regulators that nearly two weeks of that window overlapped with major holidays, and keyword searches for traffic violations return massive volumes of unrelated records. Manually sorting through 8313 remaining items at 300 per day requires approximately 28 additional days.
NHTSA granted the full 5 weeks test that requested. Now I've been digging through the analytics of the show and noticed about 37 to 38% of you are following the channel. I love you. Thank you so much for that and I'm forever grateful for you. You have helped us get to where we are, but we need to get to the next level. We need to level up. And the other 63% of you that have not hit the follower subscribe button, you can help us do that. All you need to do is hit the
follower subscribe button. Takes a second. I've been an independent journalist for the last six years covering SpaceX, Elon Musk, Tesla, Boring Company, XXAI, everything Elon has been doing and everything in his perimeter. And I'm going to continue doing this for the next 10 years. And all I ask from you is one second of your time to hit the follow or subscribe button. You have no idea how much that helps us.
It is such a big deal. And also, if you have the opportunity, leave us a five star review because that would be amazing, especially the people that have been here for a while. If all of you left us a five star review, we would be through the moon right through it. And I'm totally, extremely grateful for all of you here. And I am blessed to have you in this community. So thank you so much for being part of this.
This SFSD probe is just one of three major NHTSA investigations Tesla is juggling juggling right now. The company also faces probes into delayed crash reporting and inoperative door handles on Model 3 vehicles.
Tesla told regulators that responding to three large information requests in short order is unduly burdensome and affects the quality of responses, and the door handle investigation alone covers roughly 179,000 vehicles from 2022. Now, a separate probe in FS DS ability to handle reduced visibility conditions like fog and sun glare has been running since October 2024. And after multiple crashes, including one fatality that's right on the books and the subscription announcement that's
a new one, that's great. January 14th caught everybody off guard. Didn't expect this, but there's a pattern here. California's DMV gave Tesla 60 days to fix its deceptive marketing starting December 16th. 60 Days Later falls on February 14th, Valentine's Day, the exact date the Elon Musk chose to end one time FSD purchases. Moving to subscription only detaches Tesla from the promise that buyers were purchasing a future proof autonomous capability.
Subscription customers pay for what FSD delivers today, a Level 2 driving assistance assistance system, nothing more. That distinction matters in courtrooms and regulatory hearings, where Tesla faces accusations of overselling a product that has never matched its name. Now the one time purchase option created legal exposure. Tesla no longer wants to carry. They don't want that burden.
And for years, Tesla told buyers, Elon Musk told buyers that their cars would eventually become robo taxis worth hundreds of thousands of dollars and that FSD prices would keep rising as the software improved. Neither prediction is true at all. You can't use your car as a robo taxi right now. You might not be able to for the next 5 years if possible. FSD peaked at $15,000 in late 2022 before Tesla cut its price to 8000 in 2024. The subscription dropped from 199 to $99 monthly during the
same period. And at current pricing, buying FSD outright only made sense if you believed in the autonomy promise, since it would take nearly seven years of $99 monthly payments to break even at 8 grand. Some people would prefer the $99, right? Most car buyers do not keep their vehicles that long. The promise faces existential pressure from straight
regulators too. Federal investigators and class action lawyers who allege Tesla deceived them after the technology's capabilities were not realized after years now. Musk also admitted on a recent earnings called the hardware 3 vehicles. A significant portion of its existing fleet cannot achieve full autonomy as originally promised. Those owners were told their cars had all the hardware needed to become full self driving with
future software updates. Now, Tesla says some will need retrofits, though no detailed upgrade plans have been announced. Moving to subscription only eliminates ongoing commitments to driver and delivery capabilities that the company may never achieve on legacy hardware. New subscription customers get what FSD delivers today without any implied promise about the future and tomorrow, and Tesla Score business provides the financial context for why FSD performance carries such weight.
The company delivered 1.64 million vehicles in 2025, down 9% for the prior year. Chinese rival BYD sold 2.26 million EVs during the same period, claiming the title Tesla held for years. CFO of Tesla disclosed in October that only about 12% of Tesla fleets has paid for FSD. Boasting that take rate became a key milestone in Musk's new $1 trillion compensation package, which requires 10 million active FSD subscriptions before 2035 for his stock awards to fully
vest. Lower upfront costs through subscription only access could theoretically Dr. adoption, though the regulatory scrutiny may offset any marketing benefits. Waymo continues pulling ahead in the robotaxi race. Tesla once seemed destined to dominate. Alpha's autonomous vehicle division now completes over 450,000 paid rides per week across Austin, San Francisco, Phoenix, Atlanta and LA. Expansion into London and Tokyo is planned for 2026.
And now Tesla launched supervised robo taxi testing in Austin last year and offers ride hailing with human drivers in San Francisco. But the company still lacks the permits required to test or operate autonomous vehicles without a safety driver in California, the state where Tesla builds half a million cars annually, is the same state threatening to suspend its sales license over marketing language.
The NHTSA will likely seek another extension request from Tesla after the February 23 deadline passes. The company has already signalled it will ask for more time to provide detailed information about each complaint, including software versions, driver alerts and crash outcomes. The agency wants timelines for every incident starting 30 seconds before the initial violation and ending with a final violation, driver
disengagement or crash. The level of granularity across thousands of records will take months to compile, according to Tesla. But they do have access to XAI, so that could be a thing they could use to speed up this process. The investigation could easily stretch through 2026 while Tesla simultaneously fights California's marketing requirements and prepares for its earnings report next week.