Starship IFT5 Update [Starbase Shutting Down?] - podcast episode cover

Starship IFT5 Update [Starbase Shutting Down?]

Jun 12, 202416 min
--:--
--:--
Listen in podcast apps:
Metacast
Spotify
Youtube
RSS

Episode description

The Starship system is a fully reusable, two‑stage‑to‑orbit super heavy‑lift launch vehicle under development by SpaceX. The system is composed of a booster stage named Super Heavy and a second stage, also called "Starship"

Transcript

Hey everybody. Welcome back to the Elon Musk Podcast. This is a show where we discuss the critical crossroads that shape SpaceX, Tesla X, The Boring Company, and Neuralink. I'm your host, Will Walden, and on this episode we're going to be talking about Starship, IFT 4, IFT 5, possibly IFT 6, but mainly we're going to be talking about an environmental group that's going to be possibly contesting Starbase down in Texas. Could they be cancelling Starship launches in Texas?

We're going to take a look at that in a second, but let's first talk about I, FT4 and IFT 5. IFT 4 went off without a hitch, almost. There's a little bit of a hitch. The landing of the booster was great. The way that the ship came back into the atmosphere looked great, but there were some heat tile adjustments that need to be made for I, FT-5. And Elon Musk has talked about this a little bit.

He said that the new heat tiles for I, FT-5 will be a little bit better, be able to reduce the friction, reduce the heat on the ship. And also they're going to be putting like a secondary layer, like a secondary skin underneath those tiles. So if there's any sort of leakage from the plasma that goes through those tiles and hits the actual ship, there could be another material there that will hopefully stop it from rupturing the stainless steel construction of the ship fuselage.

Not only that, they're going to take a look at the hinges, where the wings and the hinges of the ship itself connect, and they're going to be making some adjustments to those. Because as you can see from the footage from IFT 4, when it comes back into the atmosphere, that's kind of where things went bad, but it made it, so it's OK, right? But they're trying to get this perfect. So when they put people in this, it's going to be a whole

complete safe ship. And they need to put Starship in this category of safe for people because they need to send it to the moon for the Artemis program, Artemis 3 in particular. And of course SpaceX thinks they're going to be able to do it in a few years. But experts around the globe have said numerous times it's

probably going to be 20-30. And not just because of Starship, but because of NASA and also Axiom putting everything together and making sure that all the I's are dotted, all the T's are crossed before they actually launch to the moon. It's a big undertaking. You can't just stick somebody in a rocket and hope it works. You have to make sure that it's completely safe. And if it's not completely safe, they have to not do it.

So there, there was a little margin for error, but this is going to be a margin that SpaceX doesn't want to deal with. So they're going to get this right in the next few flights for the ship. Now, Elon also mentioned something about landing the booster back at Starbase instead of in the Gulf of Mexico. Did they get enough data? Elon mentioned this in a in a post that he had on X the other

day. He did a live stream and he was watching some games, watching some stuff and he just talked, started talking about Starship. Basically. He talked about will they be catching IFT 5 and he said they don't quite have enough data yet to see if they're going to catch this thing, but there's a possibility that they still

will. So what Elon was saying he got excited after ift 4 landed after everything looked great he's like we're going to try to lot we're trying to catch it in IFT 5 everybody blew up I went nuts I was like no this can't happen like you're going to ruin everything can't do it.

I freaked out. So IFT 5 Elon's, like if we have enough data that supports that we can actually land this thing, we're going to do it. So on the way back to the landing, the, the explosive mechanism that destroys the booster on its way back down to Earth gets saved, right? So at some time during the flight it gets saved. So will they be able to change that? Will the FAA be able to change that before this next flight?

Will they have to make they have to make sure that they destroy the the booster if they get enough data that says it might not make it back or they might do a landing in the Gulf of Mexico again. So we're going to see that's where we're at right now. We're going to see if we're going to wait and see what Elon and SpaceX say. But Elon said they're going to try to launch this thing in July. How could they launch this in July? Like within a month?

The turn around could be pretty quick if I mean, if that's the case, if he thinks, but he's also said that in the past, right? So Elon has said that in the past that they're going to launch this thing in a month, which of course they they've never done before. So could this be the first time that they do a one month turn around for Starship? That's another thing we have to think about. One month turn around for Starship would be incredible. They have other boosters ready,

They have a ship ready. They've done some testing already, but they haven't done final testing. They haven't done a final stack, they haven't done AD stack. They haven't checked all the ground systems again, they're just getting over IFT 4. They haven't even moved everything to the pad yet and it's been a few days. So what's happening? You know, if it were going to be in a month, they would have that stuff down there already and starting the testing out. So I don't think they're going

to make it in the month. I think they're going to be close if they if they can figure it out really quick, They have to pour through a bunch of data. They have to talk to the FAA to get another license. You know, the, the incident report for I FT3 was kind of it was pushed aside for the flight. Why are they going to be doing that for IFT 4 two probably and IFT 5 as well. So we're going to see what happens with that. Right now it's a waiting game.

As much as everybody's excited about a July flight, I don't think it's going to happen. I think we're going to be getting like, you know, maybe, you know, maybe not an early July flight, but maybe like a late July flight. I think that might happen. So not quite a month, a little bit over a month, I should say. So like a month and three weeks or something like that. Could be the next flight of Starship or a little bit longer. It could be two months.

They might have a lot of work to do and they might have to change some things. So not only do they have the hardware right, So we see the hardware testing on the outside. We see the booster blast for the for the tests. We also see the ship blast for the test. You know, they check all the engines, make sure everything works, make sure the ground systems work. They cryogenically cool it. They make sure all of that hardware works. But when you are inside of the

ship, there's electronics. And within those electronics there's code. You know, the code that runs it. It's important. And if something is a little bit off, they might have to recode a bunch of stuff. And sure, code is a little bit faster than building a rocket, of course, but you got a debug code, you have to test it, you have to QA it. There's all sorts of steps that you have to do in order to make sure that the code works

properly every single time. So you don't get spaghetti code, which is kind of a, it's a code word for just a bunch of garbage code in there that nobody really wants or uses anymore. Yeah, I got to have clean code. So every single flight they probably look at the code and go, how can we improve? You know, if they're not doing that, then I don't see, you know, why did they, why they, why wouldn't they do that? They have to do that every flight.

How can we make the code better to make things more efficient? We don't want to use as many lines of code. You know, we want to use as few lines of code as possible. The best part is no part, right? So I have T5, possibly late July. That's what I'm guessing. Let me know in the comments what you think, what you think about that. I think late July, good estimate for IFT 5 flight, maybe early July too or early August. So that'll be a hot one. That'll be really hot 1.

So I also want to talk to you about this. There's another thing. Starship launch damage, shore bird nests, environmental survey finds. OK, so we've had some stuff like this before, right? Environmentalists love to hate on Starship and the surrounding area because it's a protected environmental zone. It's a protected beach. It's a they're in a protected area, this giant rocket factory and giant rockets are in a protected area. So wildlife here is very

precious now. Piping plovers and turtles and things like that are protected species. Now here I'm going to zoom in a little bit for you so you can see some of this text said last week, launch of Starship from South Texas damaged or destroyed numerous shore bird nests in the area surrounding the private space company's launch facilities, according to a new report that also noted other

environmental damages. The nonprofit Coastal Band Bays and Estuaries Program said its survey found that each of nine nests it monitored South of the launchpad had missing and broken eggs after Thursday morning's launch. OK, ongoing here. What's they say down here? Ongoing and annual monitoring. A Boca Chigari has documented shifts and overall reductions in shore bird nesting activity in recent years since rocket testing and launch activity

began. OK, so they do surveys around the Texas Parks and Wildlife Area, where SpaceX is planted, where they where they have all of their facilities. And this is what the environmentalists and the environmental studies are going to be looking to do possibly in the future. So if they can show enough evidence that SpaceX is damaging endangered species under the Endangered Species Act, some populations of snow plovers are considered a near threatened species.

The Texas population is not among them, but the Snowy and Wilson's plovers are, however, considered species of greatest conservation need under the state Wild Wildlife Action Plan monitored by the Texas Park and Wildlife Department. OK, So what does that mean? It means there's really endangered species near Starbase, and if SpaceX destroys any of their habitats, they could be at fault and environmental groups could sue them.

They could go to court for this. Could they possibly halt Starship operations and launches from Starbase until SpaceX figures this out and how to protect these animals? The answer is probably. They've done it before. Remember when they had the environmental study a little while ago and it took them months and months to figure this out. So Elon and company, along with the government came to a conclusion that they didn't really damage anything environmentally.

So they had to put in some measures to protect it so they didn't damage it in the future. And that's kind of where we're at with these environmental or endangered species here, is if they can prove enough that SpaceX is destroying these species of birds and becoming a detriment to them, they could possibly halt production of Starships and halt launches of Starbase while there's another environmental review. Could this happen? If there's enough evidence?

I believe it could. I believe it could because if, and they already did an environmental review, but it's not unheard of to do numerous environmental reviews if there's more evidence shown. It's not, it's not like court. You don't go to court and you know, say if you did a crime, you're like, Oh yeah, you got off, you know, like, cool, you're not guilty. OK, so then you then you're free, right? The court said you're free, but there's more evidence because this is an ongoing thing.

So they said at the time SpaceX had altered a wild or a habitat on a Wildlife Refuge. So if they're building a case here with if they can do hundreds of, if they can show hundreds of pieces of evidence for this, could they halt Starbase for a little while? SpaceX, as you can see in the US Fish and Wildlife Service in Texas Parks and Wildlife Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Of course they wouldn't. This could be a big deal.

Could be a big deal if they, if they're shown to destroy some endangered species, either A, they would just pay a fine, which is probably going to be the case. Probably going to pay a fine to be like, oh man, we didn't know. We didn't know this was going to happen. Or if they do it enough, they pay a bunch of fines, which, you know, they should pay for what they did wrong. Of course everybody should. That's the right thing to do.

But if they really destroy some stuff and then these habitats and these birds never come back and SpaceX is at fault. Look, I'm with you. I understand we need to go to Mars, right? We need to go to Mars. And I, I want us to go to Mars. But we only live on Earth, right? We live on Earth. We should protect it and take care of it. This is our home. We don't live on Mars yet.

So at least protect this stuff. And I, I think what was what would actually happen is the Department of Wildlife in the Texas Parks Wildlife Service, US Fish and Wildlife Service and SpaceX. But I'll come to a conclusion of how to protect these these species and what can SpaceX do even more than they've already done to protect these species. And I think that's the case. What would happen here as opposed to them shutting down operations?

Unless it's really bad, If it's really bad, then SpaceX could do something. You know, it could be, could be something really bad. So we'll see. We'll see in the, that's pretty much where we're at right now. We'll see what happens, see if there's any sort of if there's any sort of Wildlife Conservation department and these environmentalist groups, if they talk to each other and if there's a lawsuit, we'll see. But I'm excited for IFT 5 because it's not going to happen before IFT 5.

I'm excited for IFT 5I. I would love for them to catch the booster, but I don't think it's going to happen. I don't think it's, I don't think it's worth it. That's not worth it for SpaceX to do that. So I don't think IFT 5 is going to be a catch. I think IFT 6 is going to be a catch, maybe IFT 7, maybe they're going to wait a little bit, which they probably should. Hey, thank you so much for listening today. I really do appreciate your support.

If you could take a second and hit the subscribe or the follow button on whatever podcast platform that you're listening on right now, I greatly appreciate it. It helps out the show tremendously and you'll never miss an episode. And each episode is about 10 minutes or less to get you caught up quickly. And please, if you want to support the show even more, go to patreon.com/stage Zero. And please take care of yourselves and each other, and I'll see you tomorrow.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android
Open in Metacast