Thanks to our amazing community members like you, we've reached the top 15 of Spotify's video podcast, the Top 10 audio podcasts on both Apple and Spotify for the tech category, so you all make this possible. If you want to support us more, check out our Patreon that's patreon.com/stage 0 News so we can keep this free and open for you to enjoy.
Elon Musk told a private audience that American politics is entering a 12 year run under Republicans, starting with a second Trump term and continuing with two terms for JD Vance. Now, what does that prediction reveal about Musk's current political posture? We'll unpack where he said it, who is in the room, and why the setting matters for how he sees
power, tech, and risk. We'll look at his comments about personal security, his sci-fi references, and his ongoing ties to a federal cost cutting cohort known as DOGE, and we'll get into that right after this quick break. The reset is simple and the facts are concrete. Musk delivered the forecast at a reunion for DOGE, his former
federal cost cutting group. From that scene, we move into what he actually said, how the audience reacted, and what the venue signals about his continuing political engagement. Now, let's start with a setting. The event took place on November 22nd, 2025 at a facility he owns near SpaceX and The Boring Company in Bastrop, TX with roughly 150 current and former DOGE members and family in attendance. Now Musk did not appear in person.
He joined by video from a dark undisclosed location and he cited personal safety concerns. He said he sees himself as a top assassination target after Trump advance a claim that framed the rest of his remarks with a tone of threat awareness. Now to the court of the prediction. Musk said the country is at the beginning of what he characterized as a 12 year span of Republican dominance.
In his view, the sequence runs through a second Donald Trump term, then two consecutive terms for Vice President JD Vance. And the statement was not a polar a model. It was a forward projection by Musk delivered to a sympathetic audience of former federal collaborators. There are people on his side. Consider the audience and the history. DOGE is described as a federal cost cutting group that worked under the Trump administration
still doing work there. And he thanked members that have worked and continue to work for sacrifices they made while executing those mandates in Washington DC. He addressed them as former teammates, not as a general public crowd, which made the forecast feel like internal guidance rather than a public sub speech. And the choice Affirm anchors the message in his continuing relationship with the Doge Network. Now, the presentation itself carried some mixed signals.
Some attendees expected an in person appearance and were disappointed when he did not show up. The video backdrop, described as dark and undisclosed and gloomy, underlined the security theme he raised at the top. The visual choice reinforced his claim that proximity could be risky, while still letting him speak directly to the people who
once worked under his direction. Now the talk ranged across topics beyond elections, though, he worried about potential civil unrest, then pivoted to space colonization and science
fiction. He referenced classic works and including The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress and Asimov's Foundation, which placed his political reading inside a larger story about tech scarcity and the governance of frontier societies in the mix of threat assessment and speculative horizon matches the way he often frames long term projects. And why put a 12 year marker on the calendar for a private
reunion now? My analysis is that predictions like this do several jobs at once, especially inside a closed door network. They give alumni a shared objective, they elevate the stakes of their future work, and they signal continuity of leadership influence even after formal roles change. The number is memorable, the sequence is very straightforward, and both function as a banner for people who already identify with his project style. They're his people.
He wants him to stay with him. He doesn't want to go outside the lines. He knows what they'll vote for, and he knows whose side they're on. His safety rhetoric serves a strategic purpose. Inside the same frame, declaring oneself a top target can justify distance, explain absences and prepare allies for a leadership model that operates through remote directives. It also sets an expectation that any public reversal or delay will be attributed to security calculus, not a retreat.
The claim may also encourage supporters to see routine political conflicts through a lens of personal risk and loyalty to their leaders. Now this is an important venue because it reveals the network. He still prioritizes a reunion of a cost cutting cohort. It's not just a regular campaign, really, it's people that he used to work with as a professional alumni gathering, bound by shared missions and scars from high pressure government work.
Speaking to that audience lets him connect future political timelines with technical statecraft, which is where those alumni made their names and reputations. The message lands as a continuation of that work rather than a pivot away from it. Now the reaction in the room was something it wasn't. Uniform enthusiasm, disappointment about the lack of in person apparent shows the paradox of charisma at a distance. The disappointment does not negate the influence of the
message though. But it does point to the cost of relying on video as the primary delivery method for a prediction meant to galvanized this community. It also shows the importance of setting and staging when signaling momentum with your crew. And his cultural references deserve a closer read because they map to his governing instincts. Heinlein's and Asimov's worlds present lean institutions, unusual leaders, and long arc plans that outlast short
election cycles. By citing those works alongside talk of civil unrest and space colonization, he thread the story where political control, technological capabilities, and survival planning sit on one timeline for an audience of former government fixers, though as both familiar and attractive, since it pulls budget discipline, engineering, and national destiny into one narrative.
And there's also the matter of his stated regret about political involvement, which the source notes from all of this. He has expressed that sentiment before, yet he continues to appear in political context, speak to political actors, and offer forecasts about the next two election cycles. And my analysis of this is that the continued engagement signals he still sees politics as a lever on the technical projects
he values. And he needs politics for SpaceX and Tesla. And he sees his alumni network as a tool that can move that lever. And the Bastrop location is important. We place the reunion near SpaceX and Boring Company operations because it aligns his political world with his industrial footprint. Why bring the Bastrop? Why not send them to Idaho or something? All these people don't live near this town. I know where this is. It's kind of in the middle of
nowhere. But it allows him to blend operational updates and formal tours and off the record chatter with a clear political message. Elon can take these people to SpaceX and show them how cool it is or the Boring Company and and also let's attendees absorb the scale of his projects first hand. If you've ever been to any
SpaceX facility, it's massive. This can make his long arc forecast feel practical rather than just theatre, and treat the 12 year forecast as a motivational device as much as a calendar claim. Inside a team culture. A crisp timeline focuses effort and reduces debate about priorities. It encourages people to plan for phases, not isolated events, which is how engineering Rd.
maps already function. For a group that once executed fast turnarounds inside federal agencies, that format feels very familiar to them. Now let's talk about the civil unrest. Here it introduces a risk register that pairs with the political timeline. If you believe unrest is plausible, you plan for redundancy, protected operations, and alternative communications. You also seek policy shelter for critical projects that you think must survive St. level
disruptions. The pairing of unrest talk with space colonization suggests a survivalist here in his planning more technological self-reliance functions as a hedge against domestic volatility. Now, stepping back, the most important take away is that MUST continues to knit together political forecasts, Security and long range technology goals with the same set of people who once executed cost cutting mandates in Washington. He must like these people if he
invited them to a private event. He appears comfortable as a remote figure who still sets direction. He's still betting that a tight circle of trusted operators can carry lessons forward into the next election cycle. Hey, thank you so much for listening today. I really do appreciate your support. If you could take a second and hit the subscribe or the follow button on whatever podcast platform that you're listening on right now, I greatly appreciate it.
It helps out the show tremendously and you'll never miss an episode. And each episode is about 10 minutes or less to get you caught up quickly. And please, if you want to support the show even more, go to patreon.com/stagezero and please take care of yourselves and each other and I'll see you tomorrow.