Thanks to our amazing community members like you, we've reached the top 15 of Spotify's video podcasts, the top 10 audio podcasts on both Apple and Spotify for the tech category, so you all make this possible. If you want to support us more, check out our Patreon. That's patreon.com/stage 0 News so we can keep this free and open for you to enjoy. Something interesting happened the other day.
I was looking through our stats on Spotify and Apple Podcasts and I noticed that about 55% of you are not subscribed to the show. That means 45% of you are subscribed and I really do appreciate your support. Now the other 55% of you are awesome, but I'm going to ask you for a favor. Could you please hit the subscribe button? It'll take you one second. I'm going to promise you 10 years of this podcast for free,
No pay walls. I'm not going to charge you anything ever, but I'm going to give you 10 years of this show for free. I've already been doing it for five years and I plan on doing it for 10 more. And the only way that we can continue doing this is with your support. So one second of your time to hit the subscribe button right now would help the show tremendously. Thank you so much.
SpaceX filed A trademark for the name Starlink Mobile, and that move points toward a serious push into phone service. Is SpaceX preparing to run a mobile carrier that blends satellite links with everyday cellular plans? Now, after the break, I'll unpack what a trademark filing actually signals about this, how a Starlink mobile brand could work in practice, and what product clues usually follow if a company plans to sell true phone service.
And I'll breakdown possible customer experiences, business models, and the roadblocks that shape a launch timeline. So this is what, you know what to look out for in the future when it comes to Sterling Mobile. I think this will be really cool if they actually pull this off, if they try to compete with the big carriers, it's going to be amazing. They have a partnership with T-Mobile right now, but we're going to get into this right
after this short break. Now we have 1 concrete data point right now, a trademark filing for the name Sterling Mobile. Now a trademark reserves branding for specific goods and services and companies file before they announce their actual products. Now this gives us a narrow fact plus a wide field of implications to test out. Now let's start with what a trademark is and what it is not. A filing protects a name or a logo for certain uses, such as telecommunications services or
software. It does not confirm a product launch date or a final feature list. Companies often secure names early to prevent rivals from squatting on a brand they plan to use in the future. Now, the word in the name actually matters. Starlink Mobile reads as a consumer facing label that you would expect to see on a SIM or an esim, a rate plan or a phone app that signals intent to serve people who carry phones not only homes, boats, trucks or airplanes.
Currently, it also pairs cleanly with the existing Starlink brand that people already connect with. Connectivity now mark like this usually sits on top of a few possible offerings. One possibility is a mobile virtual network operator that sells phone plans under the name brand while it rides on existing terrestrial towers in cities. Another possibility is a hybrid plan that uses ground towers first, then falls back to satellite links and dead zones.
And #3 is a stand alone satellite first plan for basic messaging and safety coverage and eventually phone service with a consumer friendly label people recognize. Now think about the customer journey that a name like this tries to simplify. You own an app, you scan AQR code and your phone loads an E SIM labeled Starlink Mobile. You pick a tier that covers your home region, a travel add on maybe, and a satellite fall back option for hiking, driving or sailing. Now the brand promises simple
coverage in the plan. Names mirror that promise. That means you could have Starlink Mobile within seconds, no crazy sign up processes like the current carriers because they want every single penny out of your pockets, they want to bleed you dry, and they want to make as much money as they can from that subscription. A baseline tier could focus on text and basic data in remote areas, which keeps costs aligned with the limited capacity of space links.
For now. Until of course, SpaceX and Starlink ramp up their operations with Starship now a mid tier could bundle traditional city coverage with satellite fall back, which reduces anxiety about dead zones on long road trips. And then you could have the premier tier. And it could add global roaming and priority support for frequent travellers, media teams, field workers and just you and me. We could have regular phone service, but it could be phone
service from space. And you could be always connected, no matter where you are, no matter what you do, you could have a connection. And this is a great thing because I know I've been traveling a lot in the last few years, and the fact that I have driven hours without a signal in the mountains is incredible. And when you're out hiking someplace and there's absolutely no service, there is no way to contact people if something happens. So I understand where they're coming from.
If they want to make a premier brand, they need to consider phone service, tech service, all the stuff that we have now, all the data may need that as well and start like we cannot accept anything less. If it's just text when they roll out, I get it. They have to test it. They're doing that right now with T-Mobile. But you know there there's going to be a whole slew of things that they need to accomplish before this actually happens.
Now they're going to do the E SIM first approach it because it removes cards like plastic cards. You know the little SIM cards in an app reduces support overhead for that. The app can also expose status indicators that tell you when your phone sits on a ground tower, like when there's something to to connect to. Either they might have a partner network if they cannot connect to the satellite or if you're on a satellite link. So clear labels will keep people from guessing, which cuts down
on angry support tickets. And we all know that SpaceX and Star Lake do not like to answer support calls. Now this is a credible mobile brand. Possibly it also needs emergency features. People expect 911 calls to route location dated to reach responders, a text to push through during storms. You need to be able to contact everybody all the time. A product that carries the word mobile should set expectations about emergency behaviors in plain language.
And that clarity builds trust early and keeps churn from new customers low. We don't want these people coming in for a month or two and being like, eh, don't like it and then leaving. Startling Mobile needs to build on what current mobile providers provide. Now. The international angle adds layers to this too. A consumer plan that claims mobile in the name will face country by country rules.
Number assignment in roaming agreements Slows down expansion a little bit compared to a single nation data service. Maybe they start in the US because that's where they're based. Careful rollout sequence that starts in one market and adds regions in waves wouldn't match how these launches typically unfold. Start in the US and in just a certain spot. That's what they did with regular Starling satellite
service. Start with a few places, Maybe start in California, maybe start in New York, maybe start in Florida. Places. They have clear skies all the time. Arizona, New York isn't a good example of that by the way. I but start places that have a clear sky would be a great way to start this out, test this system, test the limits, and then move on from there. So there might be some technical constraints too, for anyone dreaming of phone calls from the
wilderness. Satellite coverage can extend reach, but capacity remains finite. So it just depends on how many satellites they have in orbit. And you share your signal with everybody else as well. That favors text first features before phone calls. So maybe they start a roll out really early with just text and data. But if there's heavy storms, it's hard for satellites no matter who you are. Even if you are * lake, it's difficult to get a get reception
through those storms. So we all know how difficult it is to reach somebody when you're far away, but add a storm into that in the possibility of reaching somebody, whether it's data or a phone call is very difficult. Now there's going to be trade-offs upfront, but they're not going to over promise right away. Elon will of course, we all know Elon will over promise.
He'll say that it's going to be the best thing ever and it's going to connect to humanity more than we've ever been connected and etcetera, etcetera. But those things are going to be mitigated over time and they're going to start small, of course, like tiny, tiny, tiny. On the network side, a startling mobile label would apply, a full service for subscribers, a phone number, authentication, voicemail, spam controls and call features that like everybody knows already well built product.
How's the complexity of how this signal reaches you? You don't even think about your cell phone, do you? You don't think about your phone or how you get connected, how your phone transmits to a relay station and then it transmits to somebody. You don't think it just works, right? And that's what Starlink is going to be doing and it's going to focus on familiar experiences that anyone can use right away. So there's going to be an app to sign up. Super simple sign up.
Probably a I would assume a five step process, maybe name, phone number, e-mail address to start with. Maybe your current, like your current physical address as well if you have one, depending on regulations and then what tier you want. I mean, I could see them breaking this down. It depends on what the regulations are wherever you are. But I can see them breaking this down into like the smallest
bits, right? Because phone companies, when they get all your information, they don't just get it for themselves. They sell all your data. They sell your data to other brokers so they can make money off you even if you're not using their service. So they have their hands in so many different cookie jars here and they're making money even if you aren't signed up. So they'll sell it to other mobile carriers, they'll sell it to other outreach programs, whatever.
They sell your data. So I can see start like making it super simple to sign up, scan AQR code, start your thing, maybe 3 steps. What do you want your phone number to be? Here's the ones available. Here you go. And that's it. You don't need anything else unless there's regulations, of course. So this is going to be of course, very slow, very slow roll out. Maybe they, they might, they might partner with somebody like T-Mobile who they've already partnered with for those
overlaps. If you cannot connect to a satellite, maybe T-Mobile will be the backup for that because they already have a partnership with them. So that's going to be a something to really think about because Starlink cannot work everywhere. It doesn't really work well in cities like a major city like New York City or LA. The buildings get in the way and you can't have a signal. So they must partner with somebody else who's local in order for you to get that
signal. So there might be, I mean, there might be a way for them to figure this out, but maybe there's a relay, maybe they have relay stations throughout the city on rooftops or I am not 100% sure what they're going to be doing. But remember how long it took mobile carriers to get us where we are now in the speeds that we have now was because they spent decades building out this infrastructure and it's like they didn't do it overnight.
And of course, Starlink is, they're building it over time, but it there's not going to be a Starlink service right away that will be able to penetrate buildings. There's no way that, I mean, they just can't do it. That's not how physics works. So what should you watch next if you care about this? We're going to look for regulatory filings that describe mobile services in plain terms that we can all read. Look for partner mentions and
marketing copy. Starling might send something out in an e-mail with some hints or tips, and there are going to be a leaks, I'm sure, and I look for help with that. With the leaks now, a press event that shows an E SIM activation end to end would mark a huge step, of course, but that's not going to happen anytime soon. This is just a trademark. We don't have to think about it too deep right now. It's going to be years before this thing comes out because they don't even have Starship up
launching Starlinks yet. Once they get Starship launching Starlink, I think that's when we should really think about this because right now, even though they got the trademark, they might not have the the systems in place to get this started. But who knows, they may have Starlink mobile as a a Co brand to their T-Mobile partnership. So it does not guarantee you a launch date at all, but it does reveal some intent from SpaceX.
When a company with an existing connectivity brand moves to reserve a consumer phone label, it sets expectations. Now, simplest read is often the right one. Reserve name points toward a product the company wants to sell under that name. So Starlink Mobile might exist in the near future. Support, if you could take a second and hit the subscribe or the follow button on whatever podcast platform that you're listening on right now.
I greatly appreciate it. It helps out the show tremendously and you'll never miss an episode. And each episode is about 10 minutes or less to get you caught up quickly. And please, if you want to support the show even more, go to patreon.com/stage Zero. And please take care of yourselves and each other. And I'll see you tomorrow.