Hey everybody, welcome back to the Elon Musk Podcast. This is a show where we discuss the critical Crossroads, The Shape, SpaceX, Tesla X, The Boring Company, and Neuralink, and I'm your host, Will Walden. If you want uninterrupted episodes of the Elon Musk podcast, please go to clubelon.supercast.com to find out how there's a link in the
show notes. Recent discussions have been stirred by a hoax e-mail falsely attributed to Google claiming the imminent shutdown of its Gmail service on August 1st, so this claim has been debunked and adding to the intrigue, Elon Musk announced his intention to launch a new e-mail service named Xmail. Now, we don't know if Elon was part of this Gmail conspiracy, but let's take a look at more about Xmail Now, The origin of this confusion was a misleading
e-mail, skillfully crafted to appear as if it were from Google itself, asserting that Gmail would cease operations this summer. Now, this claim circulated on X. Previously, Twitter was widely believed by many despite its
lack of authenticity. Now Elon Musk, the proprietor of X slash Twitter and recognizes the wealthiest individual globally, further captivated public attention by responding to an inquiry on the platform regarding the development of Xmail. He replied, It's coming, that's it sparked widespread speculation and discussion, and Musk's response, though very brief, was loaded with implications, leaving the public and tech enthusiasts pondering the potential of Xmail. Now, efforts to obtain more
details from X have been made, aiming to claim Musk's plans for the new e-mail service and the anticipation surrounding Xmail is not without his concerns, particularly regarding security. Now, given the recent Gmail hoax, users are advised to exercise caution with any communications related to Gmail or Xmail, as these could potentially be exploited by cybercriminals for phishing scams.
Now the challenge Elon Musk faces in launching Xmail is not insignificant, notably due to the existing use of the Xmail name by other e-mail services. Acres Research Online reveals multiple services already operating under the Xmail brand, which could complicate Musk's endeavor completely. And despite these hurdles, Musk's track record and financial resources suggest he may navigate these challenges
effectively. However, the prospect of Xmail competing successfully with Gmail, which has about 2 billion accounts, remains highly speculative. Now the transformation of Twitter into X brought about significant changes, particularly in how user verification is handled, and the once coveted blue check mark indicative of a verified account has become a focal point of controversy and security concerns.
Now the verification process on X has evolved from an exclusive feature for notable personalities to a subscription based model available to anyone willing to pay a monthly fee. Now this shift has democratized access to verification, but also introduced new complexities and potential vulnerabilities from bad actors. Now the altered verification system on X has opened the door to various scams. Exploiting the confusion and the value placed on the blue check
mark. Users are now more vulnerable to deceptive practices by individuals and entities misusing the verification status for nefarious purposes. Now among this prevalent scam is the blue tick scam, where individuals secure verification to lend credibility to their deceptive activities. These scammers often target dissatisfied customers by saying their grievances, ozacs offering false promises of refunds or compensation.
Now impersonation scams have also seen a rise with fake accounts mimicking public figures like Elon Musk to perpetuate fraud, especially in the realm of cryptocurrency, Dogecoin, Bitcoin, etcetera. And these scams leverage the perceived legitimacy of verified accounts to lure unsuspecting victims into financial losses. Now, another concerning trend is the emergence of bots and scam accounts posing as attractive individuals, often verified to engage users in deceptive
practices. These scams exploit the platform's verification status in the allure of personal connections to facilitate fraudulent scams. Or the introduction of Xmail by Musk could potentially reshape the e-mail service landscape, challenging established players like Gmail. However, there's a lot of obstacles, from the existing use of the Xmail name to the formidable task of attracting users from Gmail's extensive
user base. Getting people to use a ME Mail service that they've been using for over a decade is going to be quite hard, and the security implications of Musk's announcement, especially in the context of recent e-mail related hoaxes, shows the importance of vigilance among the users on the platform. The potential for confusion and exploitation by cybercriminals necessitates a cautious approach to new services and online communications.
Now, Musk's venture into the e-mail service domain with Xmail signifies a bold move, potentially diversifying the offerings of X and positioning it as a more comprehensive platform. However, the success of this initiative remains uncertain given the challenges and competitive landscape. And the evolution of X's verification system has a it's a broader trend in social media and online platforms where user identity and authenticity are increasingly commodified by money.
This shift raises important questions about the implications for security, trust, and user engagement in digital spaces. Now, Elon's announcement of Xmail is a notable development in the tech world, albeit one surrounded by speculation, security concerns, and the challenges of entering a market dominated by establishment services like Gmail. The unfolding of this initiative will be closely watched.
Now we'll have all of the information about Xmail as it becomes available, so please stay tuned. Elon Musk has initiated legal proceedings against Open AI and its CEO Sam Altman for allegedly deviating from the startup's foundational goal of contributing to humanity and instead prioritizing profitability.
Now Musk, who is an initial finance CIA of Open AI, accuses the firm and its leadership of compromising its mission due to its close ties with Microsoft. He emphasizes that the shift undermines the commitment to open source technology and its intended widespread benefit. Now the legal action, which is lodged in San Francisco, targets changes within Open AI's leadership structure that occurred last year.
Now, Musk contends these allegations, particularly the brief removal and subsequent reinstatement involvement with Microsoft's backing, veered the company away from its humanitarian objectives. The formation, according to Musk, involved replacing the board with individuals less focused on AI ethics and more aligned with profit driven
goals. Now, Musk's legal challenge underscores a significant tension in the AI sector, where Open AI, once envisioned as a nonprofit entity, is now allegedly aligning more closely with corporate interests, particularly Microsoft's. And this transformation, Musk argues, betrays the organizational's original charter to advance artificial general intelligence, or AGI, for the collective good, not for concentrated corporate gain.
Now the lawsuit elaborates on the formation of open AI, with Musk detailing the original intent behind the startup's
establishment. He recalls the agreement with Altman and Brockman to create a nonprofit entity dedicated to AGI development aimed at benefiting humanity and countering profit driven ventures like those pursued by Google. Now Musk's accusations including breach of the foundational agreement, particularly highlighted by the release of GBT 4, which he claims has essentially become a Microsoft product.
This move, according to Musk, is a stark departure from the initial commitment to open source and nonprofit principles, prompting his legal action to ensure Open AI's technologies remain accessible to the public. The lawsuit seeks a judicial determination to enforce open AI's adherence to its original mission and restrict its technology, including GPT 4, from being exploited from Microsoft or any individual's
financial benefit. Now, Musk's pursuit of this legal Ave. reflects his broader concerns about AI's ethical development and governance. Now Also Musk's involvement in the AI domain extends beyond open AI, with the establishment of his own AI venture X AI last July. This move signifies must continued interest and investment in AI, aiming to develop alternatives that adhere more closely to his vision of ethical and beneficial AI.
Now the legal dispute brings to light Musk's historical position to open AIS direction, particularly in the context of his partnership with Microsoft. And this relationship has drawn scrutiny, especially given the significant funding that Microsoft has provided, potentially influencing Open AI strategic decisions and its priorities.
And the broader implications of the lawsuit extend to the AI industry and regulatory landscapes, with Open AIS collaboration with Microsoft attracting antitrust attention in both the United States and the United Kingdom. Now, this scrutiny arises from the concerns over market competition and the concentration of power within the AI sector, And the legal arguments presented by Musk, particularly regarding the alleged breach of contract, may
face challenges in court. Experts suggest that the evidence, including e-mail communication, cited in the lawsuit may not conclusively establish a binding agreement. As Musk contends, Musk's venture into AI and X AI represents a direct challenge to establish tech giants and reflects his ambition to influence the AI field. Now X AI distinct from Musk's other enterprises, he aims to develop AI technologies that prioritize truth seeking and
ethical considerations. But most broader engagements with AI, including through Tesla, indicate his deep interest and concern about the technology's development and its societal impacts. His call for a pause in advancing AI systems beyond GBT 4's capability shows that he's cautious regarding a is potential risks. You have to ask yourself though, is this because Open AI is a direct competitor with Elon and Elon is jealous?
Let's think about that for a second Now, with this legal battle between Musk and Open AI, particularly in the context of their evolving relationship with Microsoft, underscores this critical debate that's happening right now within the AI community about the balance between innovation, the profit and ethical responsibilities. And the outcome of this lawsuit could have lasting effects on how AI technologies are developed, governed and shared and bought and sold.
Now Musk's actions, both in and out of the courtroom, are multifaceted for AI from founding X AI to challenging open AIS current trajectory. Musk positions himself as both the contributor and a critic of the current AI landscape.
And the lawsuits focus on the foundational principles of Open AI. And its alleged departure from these ideals raises important questions about the stewardship of AI technologies and the role of corporate partnerships in shaping the direction of AI research and development. And as these legal proceedings unfold, the AI community and the broader public will take notice. Because Open AI, Microsoft, and the AI industry could be changed forever.
In this case, highlights the tensions between innovation, commercial interests, and ethics for AI. Musk and his challenge to Open AI is a pivotal moment in the discourse around AI ethics, governments, and the responsibility of AI leaders and organizations to adhere to their mission statements. The lawsuit serves as a catalyst for broader discussions about the future of AI and its
alignment with human values. Now, this lawsuit against Open AI and Sam Altman is a critical debate about the priorities and the governance of AI development. Musk contends that Open AI has strayed from its founding mission, emphasizing the important of Illini AI advancements with the broader good of people rather than corporate profits. The battle reflects broader concerns about the direction of AI and its potential impact on
the future of society. Nevada's Occupational Safety Hazard Administration has revealed hazardous conditions at a Las Vegas worksite operated by Elon Musk's Boring Company. This disclosure comes amiss broader concerns over the safety and efficacy of the company's ambitious projects, and the investigation has brought to light a series of grave incidents and unsafe working environments, casting a shadow
over the venture's future. Now, the Boring Company, which initiated by Musk was in 2016, aim to revolutionize transportation through the development of underground hyperloops, and these high speed transit systems were designed to connect cities swiftly. However, the venture has been marred by operational setbacks and safety incidents, failing to fully realize its grand objectives.
Now, Bloomberg had a recent investigation based on documents from the Havana Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they've uncovered alarming details about the work conditions at a specific tunnel site in Las Vegas. The site was intended to link the Las Vegas Convention Center with nearby hotels, and the report highlights numerous instances of worker injuries due
to unsafe conditions. Now among the most concerning findings for incidents involving direct skin contact with toxic chemicals used as accelerates in concrete setting. These substances, essential for the construction process, have caused severe injuries to workers, leading to permanent scarring. Now the investigation detailed how these chemicals, when mixed with groundwater and debris,
formed a hazardous sludge. Now, workers, often wading through this toxic mixture, suffered from chemical burns, but some cases of injuries being particularly severe. The work environment was described as extremely challenging, with high temperatures and long working hours during the norm. And the site, referred to by some as the plantation, was a place where basic rights such as bathroom breaks were reportedly controlled by supervisors.
The report also recounted 2 critical incidents that could have led to fatalities. A structural collapse involving concrete blocks nearly resulted in the death of an intern, while another worker experienced a dangerous fall from manufacturing forklift. In response to these violations, the Nevada branch of OSHA imposed fines on the Boring Company totaling 112,504 dollars.
These penalties, however, seem minor in comparison to the substantial venture funding the company has received, amounting to $908 million. Now, despite the significant financial investment and the ambitious vision behind the Boring Company, its advancements in Las Vegas have been limited. The operational tunnels currently only facilitate transport across the Convention Center into a single hotel, with vehicles reaching speeds of about 40 mph Now.
The safety concerns and operational challenges faced by the Boring Company have contributed to a tarnished image for Elon Musk. Though once celebrated for his innovative ventures, Musk's reputation has been affected by these recent controversies, and Musk's professional challenges extend beyond the Boring Company. His leadership at Tesla has been questioned, particularly regarding his stance on diversity initiatives, any legal dispute over his compensation package.
A judge's decision to invalidate Musk's $56 billion compensation deal with Tesla marked a set back for Elon and this legal ruling, along with disagreements with Tesla's board has LED Musk to relocate the company's corporate registration from Delaware to Texas on. A series of incidents and controversy surrounding Musk's ventures show that there are challenges faced by high profile innovative projects.
And while the vision behind the Boring Company and other Musk LED initiatives are ambitious, the execution and safety practices have fallen short on expectations. With The Boring Company now, the revelations from the Nevada OSHA report under score the importance of the safety measures and worker protections, especially in high risk industries like construction and technology. And with the Boring Company struggles in Las Vegas, they
have to be cautious. It's a need a balance between prioritizing safety alongside innovation and Busk is also being scrutinized here. His businesses reflect the broader challenges faced by entrepreneurs who push the boundaries of technology and infrastructure development. Achieving visionary goals requires not only financial investment, but also a commitment to ethical practices
in worker safety. Now, as The Boring Company continues to navigate these challenges, the lessons learned in Las Vegas can inform future projects and strategies, potentially leading to safer and more effective implementation of innovative transportation solutions with The Boring Company. And the investigation of The Boring Company's Las Vegas worksite highlights the critical need for oversight and regulation in ambitious
construction projects. Ensuring the safety and well-being of workers must remain a paramount concern as companies strive to bring futuristic visions to reality. Recently, Elon Musk announced that the first human recipient of the Neuro Link brain implant has successfully managed to control a computer cursor through his thoughts alone.
However, the lack of shared evidence and details from Neurolink has led to skepticism and concerns about medical researchers regarding the veracity of these claims and the safety of the technology. Now, a report published in Nature highlights that the concept of controlling devices through brain implants is not novel. In the absence of detailed information from Neurolink prevents the scientific community from verifying the company's assertions and evaluating the risks involved.
I was neurosurgeon Samir Chef with a focus on implanted neuro technology at the Bayer College of Medicine, expressed concerns about Neurolink's selective disclosure of information indicating A broader apprehension within the medical community about the company's transparency and also their
safety protocols. Elon Musk's previous statements on social media platforms claiming the well-being of the human recipient of Neural Link's implant contrast sharply with the company's history of animal testing, which has been marred by ethical and welfare issues, raising further alarms about
patient safety. Now, disturbing incidents from Neural Link's past animal experiments, such as severe injuries and death in monkeys, have surfaced, highlighting potential risks and ethical dilemmas associated with the company's research practices. Now, doubts also linger about the effectiveness and safety of Neurolink's robotic surgeon used for implanted devices, as its capabilities have not been demonstrated on actual patients but only on a dummy in past
footage. A particular case involving a monkey with a malfunctioning implant necessitating euthanasia raises additional concerns about the reliability and the safety of Neurolink's surgical procedures and their equipment. Now, despite these issues, Neurolink's claims of breakthroughs in human brain computer interfaces have not been substantiated, with concrete evidence casting doubt on the company's scientific contributions to the field.
Now, experts in BCI research, such as Balu Ajiboi from Case Western Reserve University, point out that the ability for humans to control curses via brain implants has been achieved in the past, and that questions the novelty of Neuralink's
achievements. Now, the BCI field has seen significant advancements outside of Neuralink's work, including enabling paralyzed individuals to communicate through digital avatars or control robotic limbs, showcasing the potential of brain implants in transforming those people's lives. Despite criticisms, some researchers acknowledge the value of increased competition and innovation in the BCI space. But Neuralink contributes to even if its current achievements may not be so groundbreaking.
And Musk's recent statements during a public discussion revealed that Neuralink's first human volunteer has reportedly recovered fully from the implant procedure and can interact with computers through thought, although these claims lack independent verification. Now. Neuralink's N1 device, which is said to facilitate this interaction, incorporates over 1000 electrodes to monitor and
influence brain activity. This is a complex and delicate technological endeavor, and Musk's broader ambitions for Neuralink include developing cybernetic limbs and restoring sensory functions. But these goals are currently very far from being realized, partly due to the absence of tangible evidence supporting the company's claimed successes.
Now, Musk's history of overstating the capabilities of his company's technologies has seen a various instances with Tesla and SpaceX raises questions about the credibility of his announcements regarding Neuralink's progress. And Neuralink's endeavors, along with Musk's promotional strategies contribute to his public image as an innovative
leader. Despite the controversies and legal challenges that have accompanied some of his claims with Neuralink, SpaceX and also Tesla, the development of BC is including those by Neuralink offer invaluable insights into brain functionality and neuroplasticity, expanding our understanding of how the brain interacts with external devices and adapts to new forms of communication and control.
And through BCI research, scientists are uncovering more about the brain structure and function, challenging previous notions and paving the way for future innovations that could revolutionize the medical treatments and enhance human capabilities. The historic Odysseus Lander, which achieved the soft landing on the moon last Thursday, is
facing a critical countdown. The company behind the space venture, Intuitive Machines, has indicated communication with the spacecraft might only be possible until Tuesday morning due to its compromised position and limited solar power collecting facilities. Now the lander's predicament stems from its unintended orientation flying on its side in a sub portion of position. Amperage edibility.
The Harvest Solar Energy Efficient Intuitive Machines initially aimed for the Lander to operate on the lunar surface for at least a week, but its goal is now unattainable. The diminishing sunlight as the lunar night approaches spells absolute doom. Proteus. The prolonged darkness of the lunar night lasting 2 weeks will deprive the Lander of necessary solar power, leading to its inevitable demands. Now, the root cause of the short mission duration lies in the lander's landing dynamics.
Intuitive Machine CEO Steve Altimas revealed that while the descent speed was within the design tolerances, an unexpected lateral move then complicated the landing, possibly causing the land in the tip. It went down pretty slow, 6 miles an hour downwards in, two miles an hour across, so it didn't have a modest speed, but since there's not a lot of gravity on the moon, it tipped right over.
Now. Ultimus speculated that the lunar surface might have Stagg, one of the lander's leg, leading to potential damage in a subsequent toppling of a spacecraft. This scenario suggests the Lander is not fully horizontal, but slightly elevated, allowing for some solar and collection efforts to reorient the Lander. Solar panels for better sunlight exposure seem to have been unsuccessful, with the available solar panels only able to provide power until Tuesday morning.
Emissions operational window is critically limited, and assistance from NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter proved invaluable in pinpointing the lander's exact location. This collaboration helped ascertain the lander's challenging landing terrain, with a crater tilted at 12°. Now, despite the compromise position, Intuitive Machines remained optimistic about fulfilling most of the lander's
scientific objectives. The company's executives believe that significant mission data could still be transmitted back to Earth now. The uncertainty now lies in whether there is sufficient time to download all the planned data before the Lander loses power. The latest updates from Intuitive machines on this matter have been a little bit sparse, and the prospect of retrieving images from Odysseus
remain uncertain today. No surface images have been shared, but there's hope that a student developed Cubesat camera might capture and transmit images before the lander's power is depleted. Now the mission's success is the subject of debate. Odysseus represents a groundbreaking endeavor as the first privately developed spacecraft to achieve a soft landing.
Now, particularly near the challenging terrain of a lunar pole, And despite not meeting all of its mission objectives, the initial successful landing of Odysseus on the Moon is a huge milestone. This achievement underscores the capabilities of Intuitive Machines marks an important moment in private lunar exploration. Other challenges faced by Odysseus?
They're complex lunar landings are hard, especially in less explored regions like the lunar poles, and the mission's difficulties provide valuable lessons for future lunar exploration missions. Intuitive Machines and NASA have collaborated here and through the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. It's an important partnership they can see the Lander. Such collaborations can enhance mission success and provide critical support in unforeseen circumstances on the lunar surface.
And the potential loss of Odysseus due to its power constraints shows the importance of robust landing strategies in the need for contingency plans and space missions. This incident may influence the design and planning of future lunar Landers now. The outcome of this mission, whether it deemed a success or partial failure, contributes to the broader knowledge base of lunar exploration.
Every mission, regardless of its end result, offers insights that can inform and improve subsequent endeavors. And the fate of Odysseus serves as a reminder of how harsh and unforgiving spaces the challenges encountered by the Lander show the need for resilience and adaptability in space technologies too. Now this mission with this historic soft lunar landing is a huge milestone, very important
in space exploration. And despite its one day operational period, the experiences and data gathered from this mission will undoubtedly contribute to the advancement of lunar exploration and the future of space travel. Apple has officially halted the development of its ambitious electric car project. Now Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, cryptically commented on this with two emojis on the social media platform X, previously known as Twitter.
Now this secession of work marks the end of a significant venture for Apple, with Musk's response opening up various interpretations of his stance on the matter. Now Musk's post consisted of a salute emoji followed by a cigarette emoji, sparking widespread speculation about his intentions. The salute could be interpreted as a respectful nod to Apple's efforts in the electric vehicle space or a farewell to the discontinued project.
Well, a cigarette emoji might suggest a moment of relief or a subtle indication of Musk's prior skepticism regarding the feasibility of such an ambitious endeavor by Apple. And the discontinuation of the so-called Project Titan by Apple implies A strategic shift within the company, with resources being relocated to other areas, particularly artificial
intelligence. Now the pivot suggests that Apple is reassessing its priorities and potential growth areas, moving away from the highly competitive and technically challenging electric vehicle market.
And many of the engineers and designers who were part of the autonomous car project are expected to join Apple's artificial intelligence division under the leadership of executive John Giandiaria. This transition highlights Apple's increasing focus on generative AI, a field that is rapidly gaining importance across the tech industry. It's been rumoured that some members of the now defunct car project team may face layoffs, though specific numbers remain
undisclosed. This development could lead to talent migration within the tech industry, with companies like Tesla potentially standing to gain from the availability of experienced engineers and designers from Apple. And Musk's reaction on X consisting solely of those two emojis shows that he has a very unique communication style known for its brevity and open endedness, and his minimalistic approach leaves much to interpretation.
Fitting mux mux edit this out fitting Musk's reputation for engaging with significant industry news in a cryptic or indirect manner. Now, the decision to stop work on the Apple Car, a project that's been in the works since about 2014, shows that there are gigantic challenges involved in creating a valuable electric vehicle. And despite Apple's vast resources and technological prowess, project face numerous obstacles, including leadership
changes and launch delays. Musk has long acknowledged the complexities inherent in electric vehicle production. He has previously commented on the significant differences between manufacturing, consumer electronics, and autos, noting the higher complexity and coordination required for the
latter. In Musk's past remarks have included pointed observations about Apple's efforts in the electric vehicle space, even referring to Apple as a quote Tesla Graveyard or former Tesla employees end up. This suggests a long standing skepticism on Musk's part regarding Apple's ability to make significant inroads into
the electric car market. Now, the abandonment of Project Titan reflects A broader trend within the tech industry, where companies must continually assess and realign their project profiles and their portfolios based on feasibility, market potential, and strategic fit. And Apple's decision to cease development of its electric car project may have been influenced by such strategic considerations.
The transition of Project Titan team members to Apple's AI division could signal a renewed emphasis on artificial intelligence within the company. This move might be aimed at bolstering Apple's position and increasingly competitive AI landscape. Where other tech giants have already established strong presences. The cessation of Apple Car project has broader implications
for the EV industry. It highlights the challenges even well funded and technologically adept companies face in entering and innovating within the sector. It it shows that you need expertise and commitment that's required to succeed for these kind of projects. Musk's subtle response to Apple's decision, particularly the use of the cigarette emoji, might also hint at his relief or
vindication. Considering the intense competition and high stakes involved in the EV market, this could be interpreted as a moment of respite for Tesla. With a major potential competitors stepping back from the fray, the future of the employees affected by the project's cancellation remains uncertain, with potential impacts on their careers and the broader tech job market.
The ability of these individuals to find new roles within Apple or elsewhere will be a key aspect of the industry's talent dynamics in the coming months. Now this pivot from Apple away from EVs and towards artificial intelligence could reflect a reassessment of where the company believes it can make the most significant impact. This decision may have been influenced by the current state of the EV market, technological challenges or even Apple score competencies.
And the cessation of Project Titan marks the end of one of Apple's most ambitious projects, signifying a major shift in the company's focus and potentially its future direction. The decision not only effects Apple and its employees but also has Ripple a threat edit this out but also has ripple effects across the tech and auto industries. Now Musk's reaction to the news, while in keeping with his typical social media demeanor, invites a wide range edit.
This out invites a wide range of interpretations regarding his views on competition, the electric vehicle market, and Apple's strategic decisions. And Apple's decision to halt its EV project represents a significant ship in the company strategy with potential implications for the tech and auto sectors. And Elon's messages show that he's a competitive guy. There's dynamics and challenges inherit to the EV market. And he also highlights the unpredictable nature of tech industry ventures.
Hey, thank you so much for listening today. I really do appreciate your support. If you could take a second and hit the subscribe or the follow button on whatever podcast platform that you're listening on right now, I greatly appreciate it. It helps out the show tremendously and you'll never miss an episode, and each episode is about 10 minutes or less to get you caught up quickly.
And please, if you want to support the show even more, go to patreon.com/stage Zero and please take care of yourselves and each other and I'll see you tomorrow. Hey, thank you so much for listening today. I really do appreciate your support. If you could take a second and hit the subscribe or the follow button on whatever podcast platform that you're listening on right now, I greatly appreciate it. It helps out the show tremendously and you'll never
miss an episode. And each episode is about 10 minutes or less to get you caught up quickly. And please, if you want to support the show even more, go to patreon.com/stage Zero and please take care of yourselves and each other and I'll see you tomorrow.