Welcome to Ed Tech insiders. In this podcast, we talk to educators and educational technology investors, thought leaders, founders and operators about the most interesting and exciting trends in the field. I'm your host, Alex Sarlin, an educational technology veteran with over a decade of work at leading ad tech companies. Welcome to this episode of Ed Tech insiders. Today, we're going to do something a little
bit new. In 2022. We're going to start a segment on our ed tech insiders podcast called the week in edtech, where we talk about what's most exciting in the field each week. And in anticipation of that, we're going to spend an episode right now talking with then Cornell, who will be the CO hosts of the week in edtech. About the entire year 2021. And how it was a watershed year for education technology. So this is a year in review for 2021 in edtech, then welcome.
So great to be here, Alex. And I'm so excited to launch the weekend ed tech next year. It's kind of like that New Year's resolution that's on the horizon. And great to get an early jump with a 2021 look back a year I don't think any of us will ever forget.
It couldn't agree more. So Ben, why don't you kick it off with some of the trends that you saw in edtech. This year, give us the 10,000 foot view of what you think happened and what it means. And I'll jump in here and there. And we can let's go through it.
Yeah, so 2021 I think for everyone, there's like a personal experience. And then what's going on in the industry. Personally, I had a five year old and a 10 year old at home in January of 2021. And slowly but surely, school came back online, kids started going back to school. So I think it's hard for everyone to realize that just six months ago, we were still in blended virtual, back to school land. And you know, every part of the country was totally different. And I think that will
be a defining piece of 2021. For everyone. It's this limbo state of are we virtual? Are we hybrid? Are we in person, and what innovations came out of that, as well as what PTSD came out of that? That's my first trend for 2021. In terms of my second one, I believe that the mental health crisis, which has been growing over time, really got some spotlight this year. And when we think about what schools are for, we often think
about academic learning. We saw in the pandemic, they're actually really important for childcare. But third, and now coming to the forefront is social emotional health. And I believe that that mental health crisis coming to the fore will be a trend that schools and parents and learners will be grappling with for years to come. Third major topic is the labor shortage. We are in a moment where that trend of you know teachers are retiring. We're not training enough teachers that has come to roost.
But COVID was like the anvil that broke the camel's back. It's like we didn't get a straw, we got the whole the whole house coming down on that camel. And so we literally have 10 to 20% of positions that are going to be open next year, and especially stem positions, especially in high school. And we're really going to need to rethink going forward. But this year, that labor shortage has
hit home. And then last, an interesting trend emerged in terms of employers dipping their toes, ranging from Chipotle or Starbucks, offering employees, you know, full tuition full rides, to get their degrees, but number of ways in which employers are upskilling their workforces, and playing in the kind of post high school all the way through advanced degree field. And I think that that is one of the most exciting and most unknown areas of our space. And those are my big four.
Absolutely. I'd love to add some color to a couple of those because I think I really agree that these are trends you've seen throughout the year. Why don't we start right at the beginning with the back to school, the sort of pendulum swing of schools opening and closing and then one child in his classroom having having COVID and the whole class shuts down for two weeks in different states are fighting
the mandates. It has been such chaos in the school systems and I think it's really highlighted for a lot of people how the US school system being led by states and districts and all sorts of political sort of threads threading through everything has really, really leaves People are very much on their own to decide what to do.
And I think that's something you really haven't seen in some of the other countries around the world, places like New Zealand and France and countries in Eastern Europe that had much more cohesive policies, they would decide as a, as a country that school, you know, to move to online learning or to, or to close the schools or exactly what the mandates in terms of masking and social distancing would be. And it's been pretty cohesive. It hasn't always
worked in every country. Don't get me wrong, but it's been so fragmented here. Yeah. And what do you think of this sort of back to school pendulum as it applies to the US and how it's played out in other countries?
Well, you know, Alex, I'm a school board member. So I've lived some of this myself, as we're recording this, we're facing down a potential new wave of COVID with Omicron. So who knows how we'll look back on the last week of 2021. Maybe it'll be the calm before another storm. But yes, this kind of the hyper local politics has really put schools in the spotlight for like, national political reasons. And I think a lot of parents get frustrated by that, because it's taking away focus
from the learners. I think one of the elements that you mentioned, of people being on their own, if I had to say, what was the biggest change for any group, it's parents actually playing a really different role in the learning experiences of their children in 2021, than had ever been in prior years, you
know, 2020, to 2021. And so that's given parents voice insight, newfound power, you know, at the college level, for example, people are starting to realize like, hey, if we can do most of this virtually, do we need the country club experience of full on campus college, or for elementary school? If learning is really only happening for an hour and a half to two hours? Do we need the passing periods, the recess and the lunch? Or can we find those
through other means? So a lot of questions, not so many answers, as one would hope. And this theme of fragmentation and incoherence in the US, definitely in contrast to others,
the last thing that I would say about this very strange year where it's sort of pandemic, part two, is that it's been, you know, you mentioned the anvil that broke the camel's back in terms of labor shortages. For the Education Technology field, it's been this sort of unbelievable, you know, Cambrian explosion, everybody, parents, teachers, principals, administrators, students at all levels, suddenly had to get very familiar with a number of edtech
products very quickly. And you know, at the beginning of the pandemic, many edtech companies basically opened up their their platforms to schools as basically almost like emergency aid, they said, Look, we're gonna make it free for you come in and do some dude, news, Ella, do Duolingo, do Kahoot, it's all going to be free as a way to
sort of support the world. And this year, I think there's a little bit of the moment where schools start to think, Okay, now that we've gotten a taste of all of this edtech, what do we do next? What is our contingency plan for a different pandemic? Do we want to think about, you know, incorporating ed tech into our policies, and this is happening both in K 12. And in higher ed in a much deeper way, instead of being seen as
peripheral? I think people are starting to think of online learning is central to their strategies, and it's just been incredibly big deal for the EdTech field. Yeah, I
think so. And related to that point, you know, we were looking at ad tech tool penetration of 20% 25%, that was considered really great implementation. And now we're seeing tools that I've been implemented almost at 100% of classroom view. This is like a new set of challenges, like how do you support educators who may not be very technologically proficient as the kind of in the Rogers adoption curve, they might be the late majority or laggards. And also, how might this accelerate the adoption of
new technology? I mean, 2021 has been just a really game changing year for our space, for sure. You know, Alex, I'm curious, what are you looking at in terms of trends for 2021? In retrospect,
yeah, so I definitely agree that the mental health crisis is huge. The Surgeon General just put out a warning and I think there's this feeling about school was has always been played many roles in students lives, but the academic role has always been only a part
of it. Now that you sort of take away schooling, I think people are really thinking about how to put together all the different benefits that school can put I had two students, including, you know, childcare, mental health, medical care, transportation, and each one of them is sort of
up for grabs all over again. So there's this enormous, enormous opening up of that, from my perspective that some of the big movements in the EdTech field one is it's really the headline for me is that the EdTech field
really matured this year. I think that you know, if you look at the amount of investment going into the space, the amount of interest for graduates wanting to enter ed tech, rather than you know, FinTech or crypto or investment banking or consulting, it's really been amazing how many people coming out of school now are seeing ed tech as a growing rising field, and one that allows them to combine their idealism of I really want to help people and help the world with actual
business savvy and technology be so you know, being an ed tech product manager or an ed tech customer service representative, or ed tech content creator, they're becoming actually really intriguing jobs for a lot of people. And that includes both recent graduates and career switchers, including teachers. Some of the labor shortage is coming from teachers burning out and leaving the classroom, many of whom are trying to move into edtech. We've also seen a number of IPOs, just from a strict
business perspective. You know, we had Duolingo, Udemy Coursera Power School nerdy, a number of IPOs this year, and it may culminate in what would arguably be the biggest IPO which would be buys us the Indian ad tech company that has been acquiring everybody left and right and it's considered DECA corn, and it is heading pretty rapidly towards some kind of IPO. So you're seeing ed tech, public education companies are very
rare. The number of them that have grown this year has been astounding, fueled entirely by the pandemic. We're also seeing a lot of acquisitions, which has been really interesting. So you mentioned you know, Baidu, but 10 companies this year, but you there are also some really intriguing acquisitions like Southern New Hampshire
University. But the bootcamp Kenzie Academy, which is a really interesting and sort of natural acquisition, because they're trying to serve students really well, and offering bootcamp style or digital skills training, just improves their mission. You also saw American continental University buy a boot camp called Digital craft, so that boot camp acquisition, which has been happening for years has sped up, and you're seeing universities start to jump into that fray, which is fascinating. Yeah.
On the m&a front two, I think we're seeing a lot more mid sized companies getting acquired, it used to be really challenging for people to see, okay, if I acquire this, how does this add up to an IPO and there were so few examples out there of publicly traded education companies. But now the kind of concept of the strategic asset that enables going public,
it's real. And I'm also interested, you know, given how sky high the valuations are, in funding rounds, we're setting ourselves up for at least some of them having down rounds, or choosing an m&a exit, as opposed to raising at a reduced valuation. So I just think that m&a activity, and just the kind of big finance meets at Tech, that's just going to increase over time and 2021 was really the Jumpstart for it. 100%. And
one example, I think of exactly the type of strategy you're mentioning, where you know, a midsize company can acquire as a way to accelerate towards an IPO is Course Hero. So of course hero, which is over the last few years, become one of the EdTech unicorns as a sort of go to reference and study material
site for college students. You know, this year bought cliffnotes, the classic education brand cliffnotes, I bought a company called Lip charts and a company called quill bought and is basically trying to buy all the pieces, it doesn't yet have to solidify its role as the go to reference site for college students. And I'd be very surprised if that's not all being done with a direct eye towards an IPO if they can get there. They're also still
raising money this year. So you're really seeing companies strategically merge and acquire other companies with real goals in mind, obviously, to us acquisition of edX was made a huge amount of news this year, because it's another very strategic acquisition trying to basically acquire a 50 million plus user pipeline from all around the world, which can then be transitioned into short courses, boot camps and degrees.
So this merger space, I think, is just going to continue and continue, especially as the ad tech space does cool off
a little bit. So yeah, the to you edX merger two was really interesting because of the nonprofit component. And I think there's a blurring here of for profit and nonprofit and how do you get to scale and it's something I talk to early stage entrepreneurs all the time, like, should I be for profit? Should I be nonprofit to reach as many people as If possible, and I'm seeing more and more cases of blended models, I think, you know, you've got people who've basically set up
a.org. So outschool, for example, has a.org, where they run their scholarships through that Common Sense Media has an incubator, where they're creating, you know, for profit companies that are really around safeguarding for kids. So I imagine these structural innovations alongside the m&a will only increase over time. I agree.
And I would count in that kind of public private partnership, the fact that universities are purchasing boot camps or that, you know, Purdue, but Kaplan University, or even partnerships, like when private companies like Google bought Socratic this year, and it's sort of folding it into its mission. It's been an incredible year for different types of edtech organizations sort of coming together in unexpected ways to make something bigger than the sum of their parts. Yeah,
it's not exactly like a roll up, either. These are strategic combinations, I think, you know, private equity, and our space has been about rolling up. And that's not a 2021 new trend. This is a whole new ballgame, where people are really thinking about putting the assets together to go public as a business and reach beyond the kind of current customer base 50 or so million in K 12. And the 30 or so million in higher ed in the US, they're really going for a global win. Yeah,
one extension of that thinking that has been I think, very interesting is that you've seen a huge growth in global and tech players of all kinds this year. So some really smart ad tech investors coming out of England coming out of Finland coming out of Australia, in India and China have gotten a lot of interesting news, you know, we mentioned by Jews, which is one of the biggest startups of any kind in India, and is very rapidly going to
head to an IPO. But Indian Ed Tech has been really on fire this year, there are so many startups there are so many companies just appearing left and right and investors jumping in. And I think India really sees itself as the next big ad tech player building off of the success of some of its mega companies, and all those mergers and all of that money flowing there, I think you're going to hear a lot more about Indian edtech companies sort of moving
into global markets. And then on the flip side, the Chinese edtech market, which is the biggest population in the world, really dried up very quickly in the middle of, of 2021, based very directly on a Chinese government decision to shut down sort of foreign tutoring companies and certain kinds of foreign investment. And it just that government policy put a huge chill, and it was a purposeful chill on the EdTech. landscape.
I don't think this could be understated. That is a tectonic shift. We were talking a billion learners in China that have now kind of been taken off the map for a tech entrepreneurs and seeing India step up.
There's some elements of it that are a really logical swap here in terms of huge market, lots of dynamics, pushing consumerized education, I will just say, I feel like in the Indian edtech market, they're really taking seriously the leap forward, like you might in telecom, you know, where some countries skip the whole, like, Let's build telephone poles and telephone
wires. And let's immediately go to mobile, I feel like India is almost jumping ahead of us and other more developed countries and saying, actually, how would we think about and tech first education ecosystem. And in many ways, China was thinking much more about it, like a centralized government might think, in more of a developed way. I think the Indian edtech market is going to be one to watch for decades, if not the
next generation to come. And you know, American consumers should get used to by Jews is the first of many Indian tech innovators that are going to be coming to the US and being game changers here, too. So very, very exciting. And a lot of good friends who've worked in China. And you can see that their work was really set back by the movement of the Chinese
government. But I think a big learning there was when you have a kind of frenzied marketplace, where there are winners and losers and it's in the education field. The government responded in part because they felt like families were being harmed by some of the swindling or a bait and switch that some of the EdTech providers were offering and so the reputable ones the larger ones really suffered from what was pretty chaotic.
marketplace. And so hopefully that warning will be heated by India and other developing countries as they curate, you know what works best for kids and try to steer families and consumers to the right learning tools for their kids.
100%. And I think in terms of the Chinese market, we'll probably see a little bit of a pivot to enterprise learning, adult learning, you know, some of the big IPOs out of China this year, we're really in enterprise. And I think with this change to K 12 learning in China, you're going to see the tech field just move in a very different direction. Whereas India, you mentioned the phrase consumer as education. And I think that's sort of the key word there. You know, buy
juice is all about that. And a lot of the big Indian and tech firms as well as some of the other AIPAC ad tech firms, so places out of Singapore, Indonesia, South Korea, Japan, are often direct consumer, they're often mobile, first direct to consumer, they know that families in those regions spend a lot of money, disposable income on education, there's a lot of demand and a lot of people who are looking for accelerants and ways to improve
their educational outcomes. And they don't necessarily believe that they need to get them from formal institutions. So there are some enormous ly popular edtech apps in Asia that, you know, we have never heard of, but they have millions and millions and millions of users. They're in the top categories there. And as you say, I think we should all get used to those apps becoming ones that are used in the US and Europe as well.
Yeah, totally agree. Talk to me a little bit about the MOOC space. I know that that's an area you've been following for 1015 years now. Oh, yeah. Yes, absolutely.
So I've been looking at the MOOC landscape for for a long time. And the things that have been happening this year, one of them is related to one of the trends you mentioned, Ben, which is the employers dipping their toes. So of the all the courses that came out on the Coursera platform this year, which is still the biggest MOOC platform, 39% of new courses came from employers rather than universities. And that's higher than it's ever been. And that doesn't include
the guided project. So of course, there also has these $10 short term guided projects, which are created primarily through a sort of network of instructional design creators and community folks, which is not an employer. But it is not a not a university either. So there's really been a movement in the workspace to start working with education providers that aren't always universities, and that has just grown and
grown. And some of the biggest success stories in that space now actually don't come from universities at all. So the original talking points for MOOCs, which is oh, you know, take a Harvard course online, taking your course online. That's what that's what this is really about. It's really shifted so many times at this point. And now you have take a course from Salesforce online to get a Salesforce certification, and then that can be sold to a
company. And a company can train all of its users in Salesforce certification through a MOOC platform. And that is a wildly different story. You also see something interesting, there was a nice article in med surg recently about how even though the Chinese online degree space is sort of slowing down. Chinese book platforms are doing incredibly high volume, and many, many, there are like 20, plus Chinese MOOC platforms that are almost all local to China, the biggest is sure 10x. But
they are still very hot. And there's so many of them are designed to provide academic credit for students and allow people to actually get stackable movement towards formal degrees. So that's a space that I think is going to continue to be
interesting in China. And then of course, as you mentioned, the big news with to you by edX, this, you know, edX being a nonprofit for since its inception with Harvard and MIT, and to you being a for profit, since its inception, has thrown a lot of people for a loop, but what there is really a competition for now for it within these MOOC platforms and other companies too, is to become the go to lifelong
learning solution. I will say it just as clear as day you know, to you calls it the free to degree program of Coursera or the six year curriculum Coursera is has the stackable, stackable model and what they want to be is the company that is synonymous with education throughout somebody's lifespan post high school or later, and they're in direct competition with each other for it. And if one of them can really crack that it's going to be yet another step change for Ed Tech.
Yeah, what a year. It's been, you know, before we shift to what's coming up next, Alex, what is the most surprising thing what came out of nowhere in 2021 that took you most by surprise and what was like the most I could see that coming from a mile away for you.
Yeah, that's a great question. I, you know, I think one of the biggest surprises to me was the rise of places like outschool. And Emil and outlier to a lesser extent, which is sort of these companies that were mid size. Even masterclass were mid size companies at the beginning of 2020, and 2021. But that really hit a sort of vein of interest for various reasons in the pandemic era. And in an era where schooling is just getting disrupted in a lot of different
ways. I mean, seeing the unbelievable growth of out school or of handshake, or of some of these companies that just emeritus even that went from sort of being mid size players to just becoming very large, very high growth companies virtually overnight, this year, new Zillow, raising $100 million round this year that I miss Ella has been around for years, and suddenly it is like, become a hot property.
That was a surprise to me, even knowing that a tech was rising, I don't think I saw the rapidity of the growth of those companies coming and you know, I've talked to a couple of people from companies like this in the podcast, and it's just always blows my mind how fast they're growing.
Yeah, I mean, I will say there's like a certain speed and education, I often call it a do slow. It's like, what seems super rapid for us in the education space seems like super slow for people in other parts. sector. And I think, you know, some of the examples you just gave are examples where ed
tech behaved like Tech Tech. And I guess that's like, both exciting and can also be like worrisome given how Tech Tech has evolved, I think, finding moments here and companies that really are achieving tremendous scale and tremendous power and influence as learners. And it's both an exciting time and a time for us to be really thoughtful.
Excellent point. And I think, you know, the backlash is probably inevitable, just like there has been massive backlash as to social media over the last year or two, I think the backlash to EdTech is definitely going to come, there will be people questioning whether these for profit companies, you know, are playing too big a role in education, whether they have too much power, whether they're sort of steamrolling local school decisions that you know, and I've seen some of that close up,
as I know, you have as well from within companies, but I don't think the sector as a whole has gotten a backlash, and I it's probably going to come. And just to just answer the other part of your question, the biggest surprise Oh, sorry, that was the biggest surprise. But the thing that I think is sort of most obvious, I've got to go with by Jews, I mean, it's been quite a long time, since there was sort of an obvious accompany that was so obviously going to just sort
of eat the world. And buy juice has just been doing it so consistently, throughout the last few years growing at this unbelievable rate, getting funding rounds that are sort of eye popping, and recently, you know, buying out companies just to sort of fill out its portfolio and it's just sort of feels like a an unstoppable force right now, that doesn't mean that it's hard to see where
it will actually go. But the idea that values will become synonymous with like the Fang of Ed Tech, it's been coming, and it's continuing to come and it's gonna, it's gonna happen. So it has not been surprising, but it's been interesting to watch anyway. How about you? What has surprised you? And what have you what's been something that seems inevitable?
I'll go with the inevitable first, the prominence of Google Classroom and some of these, like legacy players kind of asserting dominance. I think few people realize Google is not only one of the largest companies in the world, it is clearly the largest edtech
company in the entire world. And from cloud to Chromebooks to Google Classroom, to YouTube as like, if you think of YouTube as a learning platform, it's the number one learning platform in the world, and that only their penetration and like core they've become or established themselves as core infrastructure for the entire space. And I think that that will be intriguing to watch. It was coming for a long time. But also strange to have the largest ad tech player in the world.
Look at Tech as like a rounding error on its overall. You know, I think that's something that we as a space when I see building on what you said about by Jews, as more native born ad tech companies come to dominate the space, how will they play with players who are you know, more tourists in our space? And I don't mean that in a derogatory way. I think the Google work has been foundational. It's just not their core business. Right. I think that that will be an interesting thing to play out.
In terms of surprises I'd say on the m&a front. There were a lot of surprises for me one that I was really intrigued by was Chegg buying Busuu, which is a language learning platform. You know, I always think of Chiang as like a higher ed company. But I think the degree to which lifelong learning is a theme or trend, where anyone playing in the kind of higher ed and beyond space understands that they need to be beyond this kind of four
year bucket. And then you need to be tending to the learners journey, that, to me has been the biggest surprise, in part because it was going so well, for many of these companies just doing higher ed. And I was more, this is probably my limited thinking, I was thinking, How are colleges and universities going to survive when competing against or collaborating with the to use of the world and the
checks and so on. And what I realized now, as the two and checks have already moved on and said, That's too small of a bucket for us, we're gonna, we're gonna go even bigger, you know, I'm thinking about my 10 year old and five year old, what am I going to use my college savings plan for with them? Like I don't know, it's a really exciting space to watch. And I think in the next five or 10 years, we're going to have lots more in terms of learning
options beyond high school. So I think 100 as well, just for like the look ahead. You know, I had mentioned that in 2021, Maiev, kind of four themes were virtual back to school mental health crisis, labor shortage, and employers dip their toes in terms of what's coming, I'll start with the last one, I feel like employers are going to take the wheel, it's going to go from experimenting to employers, essentially seeing talent as a key lever for their business,
both recruiting talent. And you know, this is where all of this as a benefit is important, but also upskilling their workforce, to be more dynamic, and to be kind of a competitive advantage. Each week, you're seeing companies making new strategic investments in their talent pipeline. And in part, its
response to the shortage. But it's also in part response to machine learning, new tech advancements where a smaller, more skilled workforce is going to be the optimal, most nimble staffing model for companies to win in the future. I don't know, how do you see that employer piece playing out?
Yeah, I very much agree. And I think you know, if you think about how some of these big, especially tech companies, but not always tech companies have seen their role in sort of preparing the next labor force or preparing the labor, the current labor force to be people who can help them get to the next level of technology get the next level of business, they've had a few strategies over the years. Sometimes they try to influence University curricula or by offering their tools. Sometimes
they do. They do a lot of university recruiting, they do some side training companies, like you know, Cisco, or AWS, over the years have created their own certification models, which is now something that almost every company many, many tech companies are doing, but it started a long time ago. I think what's changed to your point is that companies now are saying we have the option to disaggregate the traditional education.
disintermediate, basically, the traditional education system, you know, I've been looking at these amazing statistics about the top companies that that millennials want to work for. They do these surveys. And you know, millennials want to work for Apple and Google and Facebook, but less so. And Tesla want to work for Nike and Disney, a lot of them want to create their own company, because that entrepreneurial sort of tech entrepreneur spirit has made its way into into high
schools in great schools. And if students are already looking to companies like that, looking at Amazon and Google and Tesla as their inspiration, then why wouldn't they take courses from Google and Amazon and Tesla and get certifications from Google, Amazon and Tesla, and go to Tesla University and Amazon boot camp and all of that, there's
really no reason. And I think the companies are starting to realize that and changing their strategies so that they can work in ways that are more direct to to young people, but also to career switchers, because the same not identical, but a similar mechanic applies there. So you know, if I were a university president right now, I'd be pretty nervous about the future of having to compete with marketing budgets, like those of
Google and Amazon. And you know, you have models like Guild and instride right now that are that are putting the pieces together and saying companies can get their employees degrees from traditional universities, but I don't think it's going to be that long before people really start going directly to the companies for training, even starting at a young age. And that's going to be a really strange moment for education in the world and in this country.
So I'm totally with you, I think educator, I mean, I think employers are going to jump in with both feet as they sort of start to realize how much brand power and reach and impact they actually have. Yeah,
I think that's a great point. And your concept of disaggregation, I think is a really, really important one, one because ultimately, what schools have as an advantage is the credentialing. But once you figure out how to unbundle the delivery from the credentialing, there's so many combinations. And when companies step in, you're solving that rigor relevance problem that many schooling education institutions struggle with, like why do I need to learn this? How can I
use this in real life? Building on that disaggregation theme, as I was looking at 2021, and thinking about, what is the labor shortage going to lead to? And how does the virtual back to school dynamic play into that? I actually think that even in K 12, we're going to see a lot of disaggregating and re aggregating and it's who creates education, who delivers that
education? What's the role of learner, what is the role of parent, all of those are up for grabs, I think it will, you know, in K 12, it will go a little bit more edgy, slow, whereas higher ed, and lifelong learning will be starting to be Tech Tech speed, copywriting those phrases, by the way, I
just love it. But I will say this idea that there aren't enough teachers to teach our kids is making those of us who care deeply around about public schools, think about, okay, how could we take the best educators broadcast their learning their instruction, to as many learners as possible. So I think the rise of educators that has been cultivated on platforms like outschool, I think that's going to penetrate into public
schools. And we'll probably start with STEM classes where you can't find a good AP Physics teacher to save your life in America right now. So it'll start with the really, really hard to staff places. But you'll basically see ways in which those who are really good at creating a classroom environment, caring for the emotional needs of kids, creating the right discussion groups that can be disconnected from having the instructional expertise to talk about AP
calculus. And I think that that could be really exciting, because we can have educators do what they're great at whether that's instruction, or whether that is curating a really great learning environment. And on the learner side, I feel like peer to peer learning is just taking
off. And you can see this in the upskilling space and career management, you know, there's a number of places that I follow, but reforge is one that I'm particularly interested in, you know, it's basically crash courses and sales product, etc, with VPs of the hottest companies in tech. But this idea that you don't need a university professor or someone with decades of pedagogical expertise, you actually need somebody who's near peer, and can teach you the skills that they have that have been
successful for them. I think that that will penetrate the system up and down. And then the last, I think, is this disaggregation is like where education can be had. You know, we did the beyond the wall. With virtual learning. I actually think we're going to see an uptick on early on this trend. But I think we're going to see a
big uptick in gap years. I think gap year was a concept that a few kids would do after high school before college, I think families are going to start taking gap years, if you've been through the pandemic and you've had all these ups and downs, and you have some savings squirreled away or you can work anywhere you want, because of remote work, I think families more and more will take a year and go live somewhere where they haven't lived before, whether that's domestic or
international. And the idea behind it is that you can bring your learning with you through virtual learning, but also through experiential learning wherever you are. Basically, everyone has been geographically constrained by their career and by their kids school. And both of those constraints are now off. I'm very excited for what people will do with their gap years. As we get a following in at Tech we can review. I'd love to hear stories from people you can ask me at at Ben Cornell on
Twitter. What's your gap year dream and Hopefully we can get enough people doing it that we can make everyone's gap your dream happen. What about you 2022 trends? What are you looking at? Alex?
Yeah, so I want to build on that idea sort of combine the concepts you just named about the education creators, the sort of creator influencer, the influence or educator doesn't have a name yet. And that idea of peer to peer learning and just sort of network based or cohort based learning, those are slightly different concepts. But I think they're they're inter woven
here. What I think they have in common is that they basically, question the idea of education as happening in a particular format, that we've all gotten very, very used to the question, the idea of there being any kind of teacher figure or a sort of master, in some cases, the question the idea that a teacher has to be a teacher rather than
a practitioner. And you know, the idea of taking classes from somebody who is already working in your dream job is a very different model of what teaching has meant than taking classes from somebody who's an expert in the subject you're trying to learn, those are actually really
quite different. And I look at places like business schools within universities, as a as a sort of forerunner of that kind of thinking where many business school professors have been entrepreneurs, or founders, or who have worked their way up in large companies, and then they go into business school teaching. And so they have a different lens on that world. And I think that kind of thinking is now spreading in all directions. So you know, you mentioned that it might go edges
slow in K 12. And you have a lot of experience there. But I've been blown away by how fast outscore has grown, and how there are other models, like Emile, which is basically an AP courses, very similar to the model you just named where you have, you get one unbelievably good AP instructor teaching
many, many, many schools. And then within the school, you can have people doing study groups and support and group work and sessions and you know, everything that everything that goes around the actual instruction, it reminds me a lot of what happened with with textbooks basically, the idea that, you know, not every teacher in every school has to be able to, you know, sit and recite the entire history of
America from 1776. Because everybody is using textbooks, the idea of this virtual textbooks combined with higher touch, community based learning and and Cohort Based Learning where you actually can have contact with teachers is almost, I feel like it's almost unstoppable, it's something that is going to be very, very threatening to the status quo of, you know, you can only take the classes that are in the school you go to, and you can only take the classes in the town you go to, I just think
that this has been some of the promise of Ed Tech since the beginning. And people have have waited for this sort of these moments when somebody can, you know, instead of going to the first year of college, they can go travel to Bolivia and live on a farm and still be taking great classes and still be meeting amazing people and still be doing all of that. And it happened during the pandemic. And so far, it happened with a
very small sliver. But I think just that just tearing the the envelope open and realizing that that is a possibility of what education might look like, has been incredible. Yeah, I've spent a lot of time this year talking to graduates of Minerva
University. And one of the things that's just been fascinating about that group, is that they're incredibly precocious, they're only a couple of years out of school, because Minerva is a brand new university, but they're already making huge strides doing big things, they've lived everywhere, they've been exposed to a huge number of different types of people and different
types of learning. And, you know, I think that when people start to see how sophisticated students are, when they come out of that type of learning, you're gonna have a real gold rush, you're gonna have a lot of parents starting to say, well, how can I get that for my student? It used to be just the best college I could find. But I don't think it's going to be that anymore. There's going to be lots of options.
With that in mind, I think we've struck a really optimistic tone here. The one reality check, I think we, you know, we've both talked about before, too, is the widening gap in access to education. And, you know, learning loss was certainly a theme of 2021. And as much as the innovations could accelerate learners progress, it didn't happen in a way that was equitable, or, you know, had
full access to all kids. Do you see these trends that we've mentioned in this podcast, accelerating educational equity and closing some of those gaps? Or do you see the those gaps widening as a result of this boom in innovation? But is
it Incredible question. And I would say that some of these movements are, I think, equity first, I think they're progressive. I really do admire gilds model I really do admire, you know, I think some I just had an incredible founder named David Helene on the podcast who does an equity
startup called equity. It's all about emergency funding for college students, and they've given out 10s of billions of dollars to emergency funding, there are definitely people trying to, you know, bend the cost curve, offer more opportunity, I think that actually companies getting into the education space is actually good for equity, because they are able to train people who would not have been able to afford traditional for selective
for your universities. And you're seeing that with, you know, the grow with Google movement. And with Amazon, too. So I think that some of these movements are going to promote equity and then others are not.
And what I'm actually a little bit afraid of, even though I am participate in some of these products is the sort of reforge or on deck or some of these very closed networking based learning, or Maven classes where you're learning from, you know, a Google product manager or somebody, some hotshot in a tech company, but all the other people in your class are also have a have a certain cultural capital to them, or they have achieved something in their lives, and almost everyone else
is shut out. I think there's a little bit of like a country club mentality in that that I worry about, because if that if that model really takes off, I think you will have a new stratification. How about you, Ben, what do you think is going to happen in terms of equity? I know it's gonna be our last question. We're almost done. Yeah. Well, I
think it really is a big question mark for 2022, for me, is, can our ed tech innovation ecosystem, embrace educational equity, as a foundational driver of value and of mission, I do see most of the people playing in this space, with ambitions of positively impacting all children. And I think where the friction points are, have to do with one direct to consumer models where the monetization is dependent on people having disposable income. And second, where there are these kind of potentially
insular communities. And so I just think, in every podcast in every product meeting in every curriculum design session, if people are bringing diverse voices to the table and asking this question over and over, I think this could be a new horizon, my honest conclusion from 2021 Is that our industrial model is broken. It is not serving low income learners, but it's not even serving middle
income learners either. And so you know, the alternative of just saying, let's not have as much edtech innovation, let's double down on the system we've got, I don't think that that's the right move either. So I'm just grateful for you, Alex, for pulling this podcast together. 2021 has been an incredible year, both in the good and the challenge. And I'm really excited to kick off 2022 with our ed tech we can review and excited to hear from the listening community for our tech
insiders. Hear what you want to hear about in in our upcoming podcasts and episodes. So thanks so much, Alex.
Absolutely. Thank you, Ben, and all of our listeners. Yes, please. After the new year, we're going to have frequent sessions shorter than this, about thinking about each week in edtech. And how these issues are playing out on an ongoing rolling basis. This field changes so fast. It's a really, really exciting time. So thanks, Ben, and I will see you after the New Year. Bye bye. Thanks for listening to this episode of the Ed Tech insiders
podcast. If you liked the episode, remember to subscribe on Spotify, Stitcher or wherever you get your podcasts. And if you're listening on Apple, please leave a rating and review so others can find the podcast. For more ed tech insiders content subscribe to the Ed Tech insiders newsletter at edtech insiders.substack.com