Is ChatGPT killing higher education?

Support for this show comes from Robinhood Wouldn't it be great to manage your portfolio on one platform? With Robinhood, not only can you trade individual stocks and ETFs, you can also seamlessly buy and sell crypto at low costs. Trade all in one place. Get started now on Robinhood. Trading crypto involves significant risk.

Crypto trading is offered through an account with Robinhood Crypto, LLC. Robinhood Crypto is licensed to engage in virtual currency business activity by the New York State Department of Financial Services. Crypto held through Robinhood Crypto is not FDIC insured or CIPIC protected. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Securities trading is offered through an account with Robinhood Financial LLC, member CIPIC, a registered broker-dealer.

Labor Day savings are happening right now at the Home Depot. So what are you working on? Prep for fall with our wide selection of cordless power tools that make it easy to clear your lawn starting at $79. And once the leaves are clear, keep your yard looking fresh with colorful mums that bloom all season long. Shop Labor Day savings now through September 3rd only at The Home Depot. See select stores for details.

This episode is brought to you by Indeed. When your computer breaks, you don't wait for it to magically start working again. You fix the problem. So why wait to hire the people your company desperately needs? Use Indeed's sponsored jobs to hire top talent fast. And even better, you only pay for results. There's no need to wait. Speed up your hiring with a $75 sponsored job credit at Indeed.com slash podcast.

Terms and conditions apply. Hello, this is Decoder Senior Producer Kate Cox. As you can tell, I'm still not Neelai. Sorry. But I do hope you've been enjoying our series of guest hosts this summer while he's out on parental leave. We hear the family's doing well, and we look forward to him coming back. But until then, we have a few more really great guest episodes coming up, so stay tuned.

The production team is taking our own break this week. So while we're off, we're excited to share this episode of The Gray Area with you. Students all over the country, including my own kids, thank goodness. are back in school right around now. So we thought it would be a perfect time to revisit host Sean Illing talking with journalist James Walsh about how AI tools like ChatGPT have kicked off a new cheating arms race that's proving extremely disruptive to college education.

There are a lot of big decoder ideas and problems wrapped up in all this. Okay, the gray area with Sean Illing. Enjoy.

What's the point of college if no one's actually doing the work? It's not a rhetorical question. More and more students are not doing the work. They're offloading their essays, their homework. even their exams, to AI. Tools like ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, they're not just study aids anymore. They're doing everything. We are living in a cheating utopia.

And professors know this. They see it. It's becoming more common. But they can't always prove it. And more often than not, they're too burned out or unsupported to do anything about it. So what are we doing here? What is higher education at this point? I'm Sean Elling, and this is The Gray Area. My guest today is James Walsh. He's a features writer for New York Magazine's Intelligencer and the author of the most unsettling piece I've read about the impact of AI on higher education.

Walsh spent months talking to students and professors who are living through this moment. And what he found isn't just a story about cheating. It's a story about ambivalence and disillusionment. despair. A story about what happens when technology moves much faster than our institutions can adapt. We cover a lot of ground here. We talk about students who are cheating because they can.

The ones who are cheating because they feel like they have to. We talk about the professors who are giving up. The administrators who don't want to confront the problem. And what all of this means, not just for the future of college. but the future of writing and thinking. James Walsh, welcome to the show. Thank you for having me. I'm glad you're here. I love this piece.

And I'm really excited to talk to you about it. It resonated with me on a few different levels, which I'm sure we will get to. I'll just start. It doesn't seem like AI is your...

Your beat, as it were. So how did you get drawn into the wonderful world of AI cheating? My editor and I were having just a conversation about cheating and not... AI. So I started doing these interviews and kind of realized that there was no way to write a cheating story without it. being about AI. And not only that, it was like, oh, everybody I'm talking to is in some way cheating, even if they're

They don't think it's cheating. It's just everywhere. And it's like bending the very definition of cheating. I mean, is there any other way people are cheating these days? It's not like people are taking, are people taking Scantron still and like looking over shoulders and bubbling in? I did talk, yeah, I talked to students who were like, oh, the kind of old school cheating, you know, the tradecraft.

still there. There's still, you know, whether it's people using Apple Watches to pull up PDFs or, you know, scribbling something on the palm of their hands. As one student said to me, it's like, you know, the floor of cheating is still there. It's just that. like the ceiling's been blown off. Um, both, um,

elated and bummed that I missed the golden age. I know. I would go back and forth like, yeah, I use Sparknotes, of course. I use, you know, every once in a while, I peek at Sparknotes. I'm actually very glad that I... didn't have this tool when i was in college yeah i am too ultimately and we will also get to that i'm sure one thing that really made the piece work is how candid everyone you spoke to was especially the students

And I know it's hard to get people to talk on the record about something they're not supposed to be doing. How did you go about finding these students and why do you think they were so open? The reporting process for finding these students was sort of like, you know, any kind of story. It's I'll find I'll talk to anybody. So.

I would find them through student newspapers was a big one, whether they were mentioned in a story or a few of them had written op-eds. So those students were, of course, eager to talk about AI even on the record because they had written. In fact, one memorable interview was a student, as a freshman, she had written kind of an optimistic AI.

op-ed saying we need to incorporate AI more in the classroom to teach students how to use this for the rest of their lives. And then I talked to her as a sophomore. sometime in the past few months. And the first thing she said, she's like, I have done a 180. We need to get AI out of the classroom. And that was just kind of indicative of like how many more students over just the past two semesters are using it. And then I, you know, another kind of notable...

One where I reached out to a lot of students who were having these conversations already on Reddit and Discord. And one student in Canada... She went on to her school's thread on Reddit and said, I have a problem. Do you guys have any advice for how to kick? a chat GPT addiction because I am fully addicted. And it was a really earnest kind of request. And so I reached out to her and she was like, yeah, let's talk. And then, of course, just...

You know, one student can lead to another student and just kind of trying to speak with every sort of student I could find. Well, let's walk through the tools that...

students are using? Because I still think there are a lot of people who just aren't familiar with any of this, have not yet dipped their toes into the wonderful world of LLMs and chatbots. What are the main... Are we talking about, you know, ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, Gemini, and how are students using them to cheat? Sure. I mean, the vast majority of students I talked to were using ChatGPT, OpenAI's platform chatbot. And so much so that...

Sometimes they would even refer to ChatGPT, and then I'd go back to them. And maybe they were using another platform, but ChatGPT was just kind of shorthand for a chatbot or AI. But, of course, students talked about using Anthropics, Claude, and Gemini, Google, and Copilot. And they were using it.

for kind of every facet of their education, really. You know, I... I think it's my bias as an English major and a writer where I was really interested in hearing how they were using it to write their essays. outline their essays or generate ideas for their essays. But students... We're also eager to talk about, you know, how they used it to take notes during class for them or summarize textbooks or create study guides and outlines. And then one of the biggest use cases is just computer.

science students who are using it to code. Some science students using it to analyze data. But the computer science students using it to code is just a huge...

use case. And I spoke with a computer science professor at Berkeley, one of the top computer science schools in the country, who said... his students have a serious problem. Tons of his students are using it on their take-home assignments and then when they're tested on the same... sorts of problems in class that are failing. Have they realized that if they're using the chatbots to code?

that they actually won't be needed as coders. Exactly. That's exactly what this professor told them. You know, if you are depending on AI, now you are just training yourself to be an assistant. I think he put it, you know, the way he put it was. an assistant to an ai platform and and you are going to be the most replaceable person in the workforce and he said that you know he has had conversations with executives at uh these

tech companies who ask them, why would I hire a coder now anyway? And we see that in the workforce, right? I think Microsoft just laid off a ton of coders. Do they feel that? When they're told that, hey, look, you're making yourself that much more replaceable, is that something they really feel in their bones or people are just kind of rolling with it? You know, that's a really good question. I will say certainly a good percentage of the students I spoke to.

have concerns and are aware to some extent of what they're doing as they rely more and more on AI. I think there's... maybe kind of a whiplash going on here in a sense that like they're entering school at a time when like what what can I study now that is going to get me a job later what skills will be necessary in four years this stuff is moving so quickly that like it's i might as well offload this this learning or or

I might as well not work hard at acquiring these skills because who knows if four years from now they're going to help me. And I understand that kind of fear. So what's the...

simplest example of the process here of how people are using it? I mean, is it as simple as you go in there and you say, hey, I'm reading such and such book. You know, I'm going to upload a PDF of... of said book, here's my essay prompt. Give it to me. I mean, is it pretty much that straightforward? Yes. I mean, it depends on kind of...

The type of student, the type of class, the type of school you're going to, you know, whether or not a student thinks they can get away with that is something or whether or not a student can get away with that is something is a different question. But there are plenty of students who are taking their prompt. from their professor copying and pasting it into ChatGPT and saying, I need...

four to five page essay and copy and pasting that essay without ever reading it. One of the funniest examples I came across is a number of professors are using the so-called Trojan horse method where they're dropping in kind of these non-sequiturs into their prompts, mention broccoli, mention Dua Lipa, say something about Finland, into their prompts so that...

If you were to just copy and paste the prompt into ChatGPT, the essay that it spits out will say something about broccoli or Dua Lipa. And there are students who are just blindly copying and pasting those essays and handing them in. So not only, you know, are they not. writing their papers. They're not even reading them. Well, it seems like with just a little bit of effort, you could cover that up. I mean, unless you're just so lazy that you just...

insert the prompt and just copy and paste whatever you get back. But if you just take a little bit of time to comb through it, you should be able to cut that stuff out and cover up the trail. And every professor I spoke to said, you know, So many of my students are using AI, and I know that so many more... Students are using it and I have no idea because it can essentially write 70% of your essay for you. And if you do that other 30% to cover your tracks and kind of make it your own.

you know, it can write you a pretty good essay. And, you know, there are these platforms, these AI detectors that, you know, there's a big debate about how effective they are, you know, and they essentially...

will scan an essay and say, you know, they're assigned some grade. 70% chance that this is AI generated. And that's really just looking at the language and deciding whether or not that language is created by... an lm or an algorithm and and you know it doesn't account for big ideas it doesn't you know catch the students who are using ai and saying

what should I write this essay about? And not doing the actual thinking themselves. And then just kind of writing, you know, it's sort of like paint by numbers at that point. Well, it reduces everyone to editors, right? You're just going in there and manipulating.

the language that the machine gives you. In fact, I had a conversation with, you know, the University of Florida has been eager to adopt. A lot of schools have, but University of Florida in particular, the administration's eager to adopt. And I had a conversation with an administrator very high up there who said to me, you know, what does your writer, what does the future of writing look like? It probably looks a lot more like editing.

admitted that. Did you find that students are relating very differently to all of this, to these changes? What was the general vibe you got? It was a pretty wide

perspective on AI. There were students, you know, who I spoke to a student at the University of Wisconsin, who said, you know, I realized AI. was a problem when I would walk in, started last fall walking into the library and fully, you know, at least half of the students were using ChatGPT. And it was at that moment that she sort of started thinking about her classroom discussions.

And some of the peer-reviewed essays she was reading. And students were, you know, the one example she gave that really stuck with me was she was... taking some psych class and they were talking about attachment theories and she was like, attachment theory is something that we should all be able to talk about our own personal experiences. We all have our own attachment theory. We can talk about, you know, our relationships.

with our parents, that should be a great class discussion. And yet I'm sitting here in class and people are referencing studies that we haven't even covered in class. And it just makes for a really boring and unfulfilling class. And it was like that realization for her was. like, oh, we have to put the brakes on here. Something is wrong. So, you know, there are students like that. And then there are students who sort of...

feel like they have to use AI because if they're not using AI, they're at a disadvantage. Not only that, AI is going to be around no matter what for the rest of their lives. So they feel as if the college, to some extent now, is about training them to use AI. And then there are the students who are like, why not? It's something at our disposal.

And, you know, we go to school to learn how to be efficient. And, you know, this is sort of, as one student put it, you know, a hackable assignment. So I might as well use it to hack. There's this guy, Roy. Lee, who's an interesting character, sort of the protagonist of the piece in some ways. And he has this interesting path from community college to Columbia to... startup founder. What did you make of him and his story? Sure. Roy,

Roy is somebody who just has always known he wants to be a founder, and he's been laser focused on that. And so... You know, he told me about going to Columbia and using AI to to cruise his way through every assignment. He just did not care about the assignments. And because he had such a winding road to Columbia, I had to stop him and say, like, why would you?

go through so much effort. You know, he took a gap year and then did a year at community college to get into an elite school like Columbia and then just not take advantage of it at all and not do. And he said, I'm here to find a co-founder and a wife. And I think he was really helpful because it's not just about his approach to AI.

It's just about his mindset and his idea of college being this transactional place that, you know, gets you something very specific and is kind of the stepping stone. I thought that was really kind of instructive. It does kind of give the game away a little bit. Right. I mean, going to college, it's, you know, get out of here with this business about learning. Right. It's just, it's a networking activity.

Right. And honestly, you know, as kind of funny or maximalist as his language or like this example is, there's truth to it. Yeah. College. we can get into this. It's just, you know, the idea of college as this place where you just go to grow intellectually is long gone. Yeah. No, look, it makes me a little sad, but I respect the game. I respect the honesty.

Sure, sure. Yeah, I mean, was that a pretty common perspective among students, especially at the more elite universities? You know, I wouldn't say it was common with the students I spoke to, but those students... Often sort of talked divisively, I think, about other students who had that perspective in certain majors and kind of their, they would talk about their classmates in finance and some in computer science who.

really felt like, you know, they were there for networking. Well, Wendy was a different case, right? So she is, or she says she's against cheating. She's against...

copying and pasting, but of course she's using ChatGBT. What was the story she was telling herself to justify that? Or if that's the wrong word, what was her explanation? I think Wendy... was sort of the best example, kind of spoke to a lot of students' experiences where, you know, she understands the honor code as it's written. And she... views cheating now as anyone who copies and pastes from

ChatGPT into their Google Doc and then turns it in. And she, you know, like I was saying earlier, somebody who uses ChatGPT to formulate ideas. to come up with topic sentences, and then does that kind of paint. By numbers, Essay sits down, you know, and writes an essay in two hours that would normally take somebody six, seven, eight hours. So it's kind of hacking. And she... In my conversation with her, I just sort of realized, I think the best part about this.

assignment was watching students in real time kind of decide where the line is on cheating. And she hadn't really figured it out, you know, where... She was nostalgic for the act of actually writing, but felt as if she wasn't cheating by outsourcing the deep thinking that essays are meant. to provoke, you know, outsourcing that to an AI. She just didn't feel like it was cheating at all. I'm not sure anyone knows. Where is the line between using AI to assist and using AI?

I mean, I'm very sympathetic, especially to her case, right? I mean, she's clearly someone who would rather live in a different world, but this is the world we got. And in this world, for all the reasons we've already said. this is the game and people around you are playing it and if you're not then you're going to be at a disadvantage and also just setting that aside

It's just incredibly tempting. How do you not? It's right there at your fingertips. You could be done in 30 minutes and hit the club or go to the ballgame. Whatever. You know, it's asking a lot. It's asking a lot of students to not partake. It is. It is. And I am somebody personally who, like, when... And ChatGPT, the version as we know it, in November 2022 came out shortly after. It was the first time I really played around with it. I was like, ah, it's a party trick.

And I think in the course of reporting the story, I played with it a lot more to, you know, familiarize myself with it. And it was like the first time I realized, oh, if I... you know, had two paragraphs and needed a transition and I couldn't come up with it, you know, like it could offer me something. And I am, you know, much older than these students. And there was an immediate realization of like, if I start doing this now.

I am going to lose something. Like, some part of my brain is not going to, um... to to flex and and work and that is really scary that's scary i mean it's enough of a deterrent that like i just don't want to do that um and to add to put that sort of like um ask on 18 year olds 19 year olds 20 year olds is crazy to me because like like you said you know they they have clubs to to be at or um

They have, you know, as one student, sometimes an essay just needs to get writ or something, you know. Yeah, touche. Yeah. I'm just curious, did any of Wendy or anyone else? share some of their essays with you? Did you get a chance to look at it? Were they good? Were they convincing? Would they have fooled you? The Wendy...

moment was like the crazy moment for me. It was, you know, after our conversation, I asked her to send me the essay she had written that she talked about. And I opened the essay and it was about critical pedagogy. this theory, you know, Paulo Freire, the Brazilian thinker, on learning methods. And I went back to her and said, you know, you have to see the irony in using AI.

to write about critical pedagogy. And she really first, like, just, I think, quickly flipped it on me. She's like, what do you think? And I said, no, I mean, explain this to me. And I think, you know, she had lines in the essay about, you know, learning is what makes us human. And so I asked her again about it. And she said, you know, something about like, I do think, depending on AI, you know, you're going to lose some critical thinking.

you know, it's there. You know, AI is always going to be there for us, so we might as well be using it. Is there a case to be made, a depressing case, but true, that students who... are good at using AI, and I think you alluded to this earlier, will be more prepared actually for the future that, you know, prompt engineering is just going to be the new writing and better to figure that out now so you can adapt.

I don't know. I can't really speak at all to the nuances of that in computer science or in sciences and, you know, what you have to learn in order to get it. AI to do what you want. I just can't speak to it. But in terms of essay writing, It's just kind of intuitive, I think, and I don't know necessarily what you're learning by copying and pasting a prompt into ChatGPT. Anybody can do that.

So I don't really understand when people talk about teaching students to use AI in the arts or humanities. I still don't really know what that looks like. Support for this show comes from .tech domains. What's in a name? Quite a lot, actually, especially when you're starting a business. And you probably took the time to craft the perfect name that communicates your business idea clearly.

But when it comes to checking the .com, you might find the names already taken, or at the very least, priced like rent in Palo Alto. And sure, you can settle for an odd spelling or extra numbers, but with .tech domain, you don't have to compromise. Get the startup name you actually want on .tech. Absolutely no compromises. What's more, when you use .tech, you signal to your customers and investors that you're building tech with just your domain name.

So if you've got a name in mind, search for it now with .tech on a trusted platform like GoDaddy or visit get.tech slash decoder to grab it. That's get.tech slash decoder. Support for this show comes from OpenPhone. If you're a business owner, your company's phone system should make it easier for your customers to communicate with you. You'd think that's obvious enough that it shouldn't have to be said. But how often is that actually true?

OpenPhone is a business phone system that streamlines and scales your customer communications. It works through an app on your phone or computer so your team can share one number and collaborate on customer calls and texts. That way,

Any teammate can pick up right where the last person left off. And their AI agent can be set up in minutes to handle calls after hours, answer questions, and capture leads. So you never miss a customer. That means that for the 60,000 plus businesses that use open phone, Voicemail is a thing of the past. OpenPhone is offering our listeners 20% off their first six months at openphone.com slash decoder. That's O-P-E-N-P-H-O-N-E.

And if you have existing numbers with another service, OpenPhone will port them over at no extra charge. OpenPhone. No missed calls. No missed customers. Support for the show comes from Framer. So you've dragged your feet on getting your own website. Or maybe you've signed up for a website builder, but you're bored with the cookie cutter templates that make your site look the same as anybody else's.

it might be time to try Framer. Framer is the design first, no code website builder that lets anyone ship a production ready site in minutes. You can get inspiration from hundreds of templates or strike out on your own from a totally blank canvas. Multiplayer collaboration means your writer, designer, and marketer can all tweak the same page at once with no risk of corrupting version control.

And under the hood, you'll get responsive breakpoints, built-in hosting, a flexible CSM, and privacy-friendly analytics so that you know what's working and what needs fixing. And at every step, Framer's AI-powered Dev Assistant helps you generate banners, pricing tables, navigation bars, and more, all specified to your palette and branding.

Ready to build a site that looks hand-coded without hiring a developer? Launch your site for free at Framer.com and use code DECODER to get your first month of pro on the house. That's Framer.com promo code DECODER. Rules and restrictions may apply.

Let's talk about the professor perspective. I mean, the professors you spoke to all seem to share something pretty close to despair. Yes, those are primarily the professors. in writing heavy classes or computer science classes. You know, there were professors who I spoke to who actually were really... bullish on AI. I spoke to one professor, doesn't appear in the piece, but she is at UCLA and she teaches

I believe, comparative literature and used AI to create her textbook, her entire textbook for this class, this semester. And she says it's about... best class she's ever had. And so I think there are some people who are optimistic. She was an outlier in terms of the professors I spoke to. For the most part, professors... were, yes, in despair. They don't know how to police AI usage, and even when they know an SA is AI-generated, the recourse there is really...

thorny. If you're going to accuse a student of using AI, there's no real good way to prove it. And students know this. So they can always deny, deny, deny. And just the sheer volume of...

AI-generated essays or paragraphs is overwhelming. So that, just on the surface level, is extremely frustrating and has a lot of... professors down now if we kind of zoom out and just think also kind of about education um in general you know This just raises a lot of really uncomfortable questions for teachers and administrators about the value of each assignment and extrapolate that out.

you know, not just the value of assignment, but a value of degree, of the degree in education in general. Yeah, I mean, look, I was a professor very briefly, and it is very easy to... to spot when someone hasn't authored their own work. I mean, you can kind of tell. But knowing and proving are very different things, like you were saying. And I can imagine a lot of faculty just deciding, you know what?

It's not worth the hassle of making these sorts of allegations. It's not worth it. Which, again, I understand. But I think the end result of that is that everyone... involved sort of ceases to take any of it seriously. And the whole thing just becomes completely hollowed out. Yeah. I don't, I somehow don't think we're going to police our way out of this problem. You know, one also just like.

asking professors to do the CSI sort of thing and then go for every AI-generated essay is just not sustainable. What professors and administrators are kind of talking about is one, up front, getting students, the most important thing for them to learn at this point is like why they shouldn't be using. AI and convincing them not to use AI. You know, cheating...

In general, the kind of research on it shows that cheating comes from a lot of different factors that we kind of all understand. You cut corners when you're stressed or... or, you know, short on time. You know, there are all these external factors. And I think if we can really get students to understand what they're losing by cheating, that's like the number one kind of method of...

of making sure they don't use AI. From there, like there's the practical stuff, like going back to blue books, going, you know, I talked to one professor who has gone, switched entirely from essays to oral exams. And he... really enjoys it he sits down i mean he's lucky in that he's got small enough class sizes that he has time to do this um

But he has really enjoyed having this one-on-one time with students and getting to ask them questions and hearing their responses. And it's a better way for them to show them the mastery of the topic. But he also admits that there's something lost. What does he think is lost? Well, just the ability to write, right? There are plenty of students who are going to do a better job writing and sitting and thinking than sitting down with a professor and fumbling through a conversation.

Like that sucks for those students that, you know, that would have sucked for me in college. So there is something that's lost. So I think there's got to be some sort of ad hoc way that can, you know. be a combination of blue books, orals, and getting students to really understand the value of doing their own work. I kind of go back to something you said a couple of minutes ago.

The professor who thinks it's a good thing that she was able to use AI to write her textbook. You can't really ask students to not use AI to do their assignments if you're using AI. to produce your lectures or write your textbooks or do your lesson planning, right? A lot of professors, and I understand why, are... also telling their students it's okay to use AI as long as they cite their work. Or in some cases, they'll ask for a printout of the conversation.

between the student and the AI just as a way to like kind of show the thinking. How many professors do you think now are just having AI write all their lectures? You know, there's been a little reporting on this. I don't know how many are. I know that there are a lot of platforms that are advertising themselves. or, you know, asking professors to use them more, not just to write lectures, but to even grade papers, which, of course, you know, as I say in the piece, opens up the...

very real possibility that right now an AI is grading itself and offering comments on an essay that it wrote. And this is pretty widespread stuff. Microsoft has given this platform to like all the students in the Sao Paulo, you know, high school network, you know, and there are plenty of universities across the country using. offering teachers this technology. And so, you know, students love to talk about catching their professors using AI. I mean, it brings a lot of joy.

I know another professor you spoke to just said, look, every time I talk to a colleague about this, the same thing comes up. Retirement. That's pretty bleak. Was that a pretty common level of demoralization in your reporting? I spoke to another couple of professors who are like, you know, I'm nearing retirement, so it's not my problem. And good luck figuring it out, younger generation. Cool.

Yeah, I mean, it is. I just don't think people outside of academia realize what a seismic change is coming. And it's... in many ways, a canary, right? This is something that we're all going to have to deal with professionally. And it's happening much...

much faster than anyone anticipated. I spoke with somebody who works on education at Anthropic who said, you know, we expected students to... be early adopters and use it a lot we did not realize how many students would be using it and how often they would be using it I want to go back to the administrators is it your sense that a lot of university administrators are incentivized to not look at this too closely, that it's better for business to shove it aside.

I mean, I want to give administrators more credit than that. I don't. You don't. I mean, I guess you have a lot more experience in academia than I do. So, you know, I'll take your word for it. You know, I do think there is a vein of AI optimism among a certain, you know. type of person of a certain generation who is...

you know, saw the tech boom and thought like, I missed out on that wave. And now I kind of want to adopt, you know, I want to be part of this new wave, this future, this inevitable future that's coming. So they want to adopt the technology and aren't really. picking up on how dangerous it might be. I still know a lot of people who teach at universities, and I talk to them all the time. And a lot of them tell me that they feel very much on their own with this.

that the administrators are pretty much just, hey, figure it out. And I think it's revealing that university admins were very quickly able to, say during COVID, implement... drastic institutional changes to respond to that but they're much more content to let the whole ai thing play out

And just so that's clear what I'm saying, and this is me saying this, this is my opinion, I think that they were super responsive to COVID because it was a threat to the bottom line. They needed to keep the operation running. AI, on the other hand, doesn't threaten the bottom line in that way, or at least it doesn't yet. But AI is a massive, potentially extinction-level threat to the very idea of higher education.

But they seem more comfortable with a degraded education as long as the tuition checks are still cashing. Do you think I'm being too harsh? No, I don't. You can punt. No, no, I genuinely don't think that's too harsh. I think there... Maybe a factor there is not much of an appreciation among administrators for the power of AI and exactly what's happening.

in the classroom and how prevalent it is. I mean, but you are right. I did speak with many professors who go to administrators or even just older teachers. You know, TA is going to professors and saying, This is a problem. As I spoke to one teacher, one TA at a writing course at Iowa who went to his professor and the professor said, just grade it like it was any other paper. It's sort of like turn a blind eye to it. And that is one of the ways AI is challenging.

exposing the rot underneath education. Like, it's just this system that hasn't been updated in forever. And in the case of kind of... The U.S. is educational higher ed. It's like, yeah, for a long time, it's been this transactional experience. You pay X amount of dollars, tens of thousands of dollars, and you get your degree. And what happens in between?

is not as important. And look, even if what you said a minute ago is true, right, that maybe a lot of the administrators don't fully appreciate the power of these tools, that's not really an excuse, right? That's the result of a decision not to understand. Fair. And that, to me, is just as obscene. And many of these universities do have partnerships with AI. And what you said about...

Universities can also be said about AI that, you know, for the most part, these are companies or companies within nonprofits that are trying to get capture customers. kind of more dystopian moments. You know, we were finishing this story, getting ready to just completely close it, and I got a... push alert that was like, Google is letting parents know that they, you know, have created a chatbot for children under eight years old or 10 years old or something. And it was kind of...

disturbing experience, but they are trying to capture these younger customers and build this loyalty. You know, there's been reporting from the Wall Street Journal on OpenAI and how they have been sitting on an AI detector that would be really, really effective, essentially watermarking their output. And they've been sitting on it. They have not released it.

Wow, I did not know that. Yeah, you have to wonder. And, you know, you have to imagine they know that students are using it. And in terms of building loyalty, you know, an AI detector might not be the best thing for the brand. Eczema isn't always obvious, but it's real. And so is the relief from EBCLIS.

After an initial dosing phase, about 4 in 10 people taking Epglyss achieved itch relief and clear or almost clear skin at 16 weeks. And most of those people maintain skin that's still more clear at one year with monthly dosing.

for two milliliter injection is a prescription medicine used to treat adults and children 12 years of age and older who weigh at least 88 pounds or 40 kilograms with moderate to severe eczema. Also called atopic dermatitis that is not well controlled with prescription therapies used on the skin or topicals or who cannot use topical therapy. We'll see you next time. Or call 1-800-LILY-RX or 1-800-545-5979.

Hey, it's Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. Now, I was looking for fun ways to tell you that Mint's offer of unlimited premium wireless for $15 a month is back. So I thought it would be fun if we made $15 bills. But it turns out... That's very illegal. So there goes my big idea for the commercial. Give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch.

mintmobile.com ford blue cruise hands-free highway driving takes the work out of being behind the wheel allowing you to relax and reconnect while also staying in control Enjoy the drive in Blue Cruise-enabled vehicles like the F-150, Explorer, and Mustang Mach-E. Available feature on equipped vehicles. Terms apply. Does not replace safe driving. See Ford.com slash Blue Cruise for more details.

If you don't mind, I just want to ask you about some of this on a more personal level. I mean, as someone who is in the business of thinking publicly or writing. publicly, if these tools existed when you were in college, do you think you would have used them? And if you did, do you think you would have become a writer at all? Could you have become a writer if you didn't actually, you know, write in college? I mean, I, I don't, I would do to this day, you know, I'm 39 and I will do anything.

other than write when i have to write like i'll do my taxes i will eat a bag of nails like i hate writing i hate it's just and i am a professional writer um so uh This tool in the hands of 18-year-old me, you know, I would have used it. That being said, you know, I feel really good when I write now. And the idea of stringing together. words and ideas is really important to me and makes me feel good about myself. And so that...

You know, professors I spoke to, and I'm thinking of one TA in particular who said the thing that he was most worried about is students taking the easy way out. um that they didn't sit down and struggle and you know the idea of getting from a a blank blinking cursor to one page, even if that student's not going to go on to be a writer, is really important for their sense of self. and their ability to think in complex, critical ways. And to lose that is really scary. And no, I doubt...

I would be who I am and do what I do. Look, I mean, I will not judge any student who's doing this because I'm fairly certain I would have too. if I had the option. However, I think it's really important that we not separate thinking and writing because in so many ways, writing is thinking. Right. And for me, at least, it's very often I don't even know what I think in total I write. And to the extent I think well now as an adult, which is super debatable.

But it is because I spent years in school sitting with these books, reading these books, thinking about these books. They changed me. They inspired me. They set me on the course. I'm on. And if ChatGPT was doing the work for me, that would not have happened. I don't think it's even conceivable that it would have happened. I'd be a different person doing something different. I don't know what that would be.

but I'd be a different person. And yeah, that is what's so dispiriting to me about all of this. All right, now I'm sermonizing. Well, no, I mean, the thing that a lot of the sort of defense that a lot of... ai optimists put up is like it's that it's a calculator or you know you you know i grew up with spellcheck and other generations before me didn't have that um and

Just fundamentally, I say to these people, do you not understand the difference between a little green line, squiggly line between after a dangling modifier and something that's generating... ideas and summarizing the books that you were supposed to have spent the past two weeks reading. Like, of course, there's a difference between these. We're a long way from spellcheck. Yes. All right. You mentioned the calculator, right? I mean, I.

which is a good time for me to ask the obligatory, are we sure we're not old people yelling at clouds here? Question, right? People did panic about calculators. People panicked about the internet. Hell, Socrates panicked about the written word. How do we know this isn't just another... moral panic, one that might look silly in retrospect. To be clear, this is my opinion. I genuinely, I don't know if it's the case. I think there's a lot of different ways we could respond to that.

It's not a generational moral panic. This is a tool that's available and it's available to us just as it's available to students. Society and our culture will decide what. you know, the morals are, and that is changing in the way that the definition of cheating is changing. So who knows? It might be a moral panic today, and it won't be in a year. However, I think... Somebody like Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, is one of the people who said this is...

this is a calculator for words. And I just don't really understand how that is compatible with other statements he's made about AI, you know, potentially being lights out for humanity or... statements made by people at Anthropic about the power of AI to potentially be a catastrophic event for humans. And these are the people who are closest and thinking about it the most, of course. I have spoken to some people who say, you know, there is a possibility.

And I think there are people who use AI who would back this up, that we've kind of maxed out the AI's potential to... to supplement essays or writing that it might, you know, not get much better than it is now, you know? And I think that would be like a very long shot and one that I would not want to bank on.

But if that were the case. This is the worst it will ever be. Yeah, yeah. And if that were the case, then we would look back, I think, on this conversation and be like, yeah, we were just kind of old people shouting at the clouds. Just a calculator for words. That is nauseating. That hurts me in my heart, James. And I think it's more likely, I don't know, this idea of, I'm interested in this idea of the kind of post.

literate world, and if we're on that highway now. You mentioned earlier that you understood their fear. I think we were talking about the students. You understood some of the fears they have, and I'm sure you understand the fears of all the parties involved here. And that you share it. I mean, is this your biggest fear that we are just hurtling towards a post-literate society? And I would argue, again, for the reasons I said earlier, if we are post-literate, then...

We're also post-thinking. I mean, it's a very scary thought that I try not to dwell in because it's just also a very depressing thought. And the idea that, you know... My profession and what I'm doing is just feeding the machine that my most important reader now is... a robot and there's going to be fewer and fewer readers is really scary, not just because they're, you know, because of subscriptions, but because as you said, that means fewer.

fewer people thinking and engaging with these ideas. I think ideas can certainly, you know, be expressed in other mediums, and that's exciting. But... I don't think anybody who's paid attention to the way technology has changed and shaped teen brains over the past decade and decade and a half and think yeah we need we need more of that you know i i i think um and and the technology we're talking about now are ordered it's like orders of magnitude more powerful than

the algorithms on Instagram or whatever. Look, I'm just a lowly political theorist, so what do I know? But I do not believe there's a model of liberal democracy that works in a post-literate society. Don't know one. It's really scary. Yeah. Maybe someone can invent one that's adapted to a society that can only think and communicate and speak in means. But that's not the one we have.

And to get from the one we have to that one will probably be messy. Yeah, I don't want to think about that. I don't really know how to pivot from all of that heaviness, so I'll just do it.

But it is a question I wanted to ask, because I think it's worth asking about every revolutionary technology. And this is definitely that. Do you think this will ultimately reinforce or... amplify existing inequalities the way a lot of revolutionary technologies do? Or do you think this might help in some way?

level the playing field? Is this something you thought much about? Yeah, I mean, I thought about it a lot in the context of education. You know, there are certainly really good use cases for AI and leveling. the playing field, right? As a writing tool, it can be extremely helpful for people writing it. their second or third language. It can be really helpful to create study guides for really dense material and put it in ways that are customized to your style of learning.

really cool. You know, in terms of how it could accelerate these inequalities that, you know, the idea that writing and thinking at a college level can be even more specialized. You know, I kind of put a line in about it becoming, you know, that writing will be...

an anachronistic elective like basket weaving, right? It's like it's going to be only for people who go to this certain school or can afford this certain school and have the time and privilege to write and therefore to engage with ideas and think. And if that's the case, who's going to be able to afford to have those experiences? All right. James Walsh. The piece is outstanding. It is called...

Everyone is cheating their way through college. I highly recommend it. Go read it. Thanks for coming in, man. Thanks, Sean. I enjoyed it.

Alright, I hope you enjoyed this episode. I think you can tell that I did. As always, we do want to know what you think. And I know at the end of every one of these episodes, I ask you to send me your thoughts. But just know that they really do mean a lot. I read every single note that we get. My team reads. every single note that we get and whether they're positive or negative, we try to learn from them. So just know I'm asking sincerely and it means a lot to us.

You can leave us a message on our new voicemail line at 1800-214-5749. And if you do that, once you're finished, go ahead and rate and review and subscribe to the podcast. It really does help. This episode was produced by Beth Morrissey, edited by Jorge Just. Engineered by Christian Ayala, Fact Check by Melissa Hirsch, and Alex Oberington wrote our theme music. New episodes of The Gray Area drop on Mondays. Listen and subscribe. The show is part of Vox.

Support Vox's journalism by joining our membership program today. Go to vox.com slash members to sign up. And if you decide to sign up because of this show, let us know.