This episode is brought to you by Coverage Genius, the insure tech for embedded protection available at Amazon, eBay, Uber, and more. Insurance the old way is known for clunky processes, ill-fitting policies, and long-weight times for claims. Coverage Genius makes protection work for your business by delivering seamless experiences that customers want, lifting core conversions by up to 20%.
Their global data-driven solutions are tailored for any industry to keep customers happy with instant claim payments backed by a net promoter score of plus 65. Learn more at Coverage Genius dot com slash decoder today. Support for this episode comes from Contentful. In today's digital first world, content is the customer experience.
But to build those experiences digital teams need an intelligent solution that can keep pace with their business goals. Enter Contentful. Contentful empowers digital teams to scale and launch experiences quickly and efficiently. Their composable content platform makes it easy to create, collaborate, manage, and deliver content across all of your channels all from one place. Contentful. Where content drives business momentum, get started at contentful.com.
Hello and welcome to an emergency crossover episode of the Verchast Indicoder. I'm Eli Patel. I host both shows. I've got David Pierce with me. Hello. Alex Heath is here. Hello. We are supposed to be off on both shows this week, but given what happened with OpenAI over the weekend, which is a story about org charts in many ways.
We had no choice but to do an emergency episode of our podcast, especially because Alex and I spent our weekends on the phone breaking a bunch of news about the discussions that led to what at this moment is Sam Altman, Microsoft employee, which I can confidently say is an outcome no one thought would happen in this entire saga.
This is so bananas. It is the whole thing is insane. I'm very much in the weeds on this whole thing. So David, can you help us get through what happened this weekend because it is crazy. Yes. Okay. So we're going to do the following in three parts because I think this is the only way to do it in a way that makes any sense.
The first thing we're going to do is just basically tell the story of the last 96 hours starting from sort of midday Friday until where we are right now things are still changing. There's a non-zero chance that real news will break while we're recording this, but we're going to get as close to the moment as we can as we do it.
And so I just want to tell the story all the way through. Then I want to talk about the the org charts piece that you're talking about. We're going to talk about open AI as a company and how this happened. And I know that's a thing you two have spent a lot of time trying to sort through and others have done really good reporting on over the course of the weekend.
So we're going to talk about that. And then at the very end, I wrote this down as just winners and losers. But I think it's useful to talk about kind of what this landscape looks like going forward. So all of that said, let's just start at the beginning. And then the beginning is Friday afternoon, at least as far as I can tell out of absolutely nowhere. Open AI publishes the blog post saying in basically as many words we have fired Sam Altman as our CEO.
That's where all of this begins. So the board fires him. They kick Greg Brockman off of the board. He then a few hours later immediately quits. And as far as we understand, and you two should correct me if I'm wrong because I think the like minutes leading up to this are very important. No one including most people at open AI had any idea this was coming. Correct.
It's not only that they didn't know it was coming. They were actually on a company holiday. So they were taking a like day of rest because of all the craziest of the previous week where they were announcing all these products that Sam was the face of. So not only were they were prepared, but it was actually when they were all actively not looking at what was going on at the company.
And then externally the company was totally business as usual right Sam had just been on the hard fork podcast. He taped an interview with Casey Newton and Kevin Rus in interview which they had to can because he got fired two days later. He had been doing other appearances like from all external appearances. This was totally business as usual for this company and Sam was completely shocked when the board called him into a Google meet, which is also very funny and firehead.
And for everything we understand about that Google meet is they basically read him the statement, which is you have not been consistently candid with your communications to the board. And we don't think that we can trust you on a company. And that's all he got that's all anyone has gotten. So Alex one of the things we all immediately started talking about was the like ruthlessness of this statement.
Yeah, normally when when you're getting rid of your CEO, even if you're essentially firing your CEO, you find a way to do this sort of slowly and nicely so that they get to like step away to spend more time with their family or you know, take some time off or whatever and everybody pretends this is nice even when it's not this was the opposite of that.
Like I don't know that I can remember a thing that felt as much just like a knife of a blog post as this one. Oh, yeah, this is ice cold. I mean, this is saying that you are firing someone in a fairly direct way for a situation like this usually when it is a co founder and it is someone as high profile as Sam Altman, like Nia, I was saying this will be very managed.
It will phase out, you know, he'll phase out of the company. It looks like you know, he's wanting to pursue his passions, those kinds of words. And this was like, no, we we have knife Sam Altman in the back in the night.
And I mean, just like what Neil, I was saying about this being business as usual, he was literally at a conference the day before and the night before even and I'm told was like, I've got to go. I've got a meeting. And I think it was right when all this was starting. So he was literally on stage, representing open AI with a bunch of artists in Oakland right before all this happened.
Okay, so all this happens. Miriam Arati, the CTO of open AI is promoted to interim CEO. And this is where we are. So then immediately everybody starts scrambling to figure out what the hell is going on here. Basically it was the vibe at the time. You guys are talking to people and this one answer about what was going on starts to trickle out. And this all feels like thousands of years ago. But my memory of this is like the leading reason became a split between sort of two factions at open AI.
One that said, basically we are a research project designed to make sure that we can make AI good for the world. And another side that said this is a gigantic business that we're going to continue to run like a gigantic business. And that starts to percolate up as like first sort of a leading like educated guests.
And then we got some reporting that said that was part of the split. But how would you frame kind of what we learned in the early hours of like what the actual fight was that led to San being fired me like what was your sense? You know, I still think we don't know, especially because today Ilya Sitskiver is saying that he regrets his actions. But the theory on Friday night.
The theory that started bubbling out and the thing everyone's talking about was that the nonprofit of open AI which owns open AI the commercial entity of which Sam is the CEO and microt. The theory on Friday night that started bubbling out is that open AI is a nonprofit that's the board of directors that nonprofit controls a commercial entity of which Sam was the CEO and of which Microsoft is an investor that board thought the commercial entity was moving too fast to commercialize.
And so that was the idea of how to utilize LOMs right but that they thought that the danger of the products was too high for how fast Sam was moving and there are some religious split ideological split like that was all very hazy.
And so we were all believed we were on a course to destroy humanity and Sam often saying we're going to do a store for GPs and you can make laundry buddy that was out there like that was the conversation that was happening was is Sam moving too fast with a dangerous technology to the board can him for that is Ilya religious believer and the idea that we need to be safer which is what you know open AI was founded to do this safely and make a GI.
And the existence of that tension is not new by the way like that whether or not that led to what has happened in the last four days. Yeah, I think you're right we still don't know but the existence of that tension between those two sides is pretty real and well established at this point that tension is why we have anthropic and why Elon is doing another AI company right now so open AI has been consistently chaotic and consistently splitting itself apart really since the beginning.
And I think anyone expected it to split from the top in such a dramatic way and me like I think maybe now is where it's probably good to explain who actually made this decision because really this comes down to six people right. And so we should we should go through exactly who the people were that made this decision because increasingly it's becoming clear that now it's three people against the rest of open AI which is just an insane position which is insane also this is not a public company.
So we don't have a record of these votes the board has not said anything we don't know if this was a unanimous vote we don't know a majority like the reporting is that it's a majority vote but because of what Ilya is saying today it is actually really unclear what happened here well here's what we know so Sam and Greg posted on X that Ilya who is a co founder the chief scientist really described to me by many as like the brains of the operation.
One of the most influential AI researchers in the world worked at deep mind before kind of the AGI doom person I would say the most prominent one inside the company he was the one who told Sam and Greg that they were being fired by the board at that time the board was six people including Sam and Greg so Greg is the board chair so the board chair found out he got fired from his own board which is I don't know how that works.
Yeah, no clue what's clear because we know Ilya was the one who communicated the message is that the board needed a majority so they needed four people the other three members of the board besides Ilya are not open I employees right so they got Ilya to side with them kick Sam and Greg out without any notice and now Ilya is saying after all of this and after pretty much all of the company is set to resign and go to Microsoft with Sam I actually regret that I was a big fan of the board.
Ilya was the one who asked me to go to Microsoft with Sam I actually regret this and I also will code of Microsoft with Sam if we don't bring that back okay we're going to get to that like a heath unbelievable spoiler alert on the story like come on. Anybody listening to this is well as well like if you're listening to an emergency episode of this it's like you're in it.
That's fair. Yeah, no, I think where all this goes is very interesting and I think that the Ilya piece of this is actually super interesting but just to just to get back to Friday night because I think like the timeline here actually matters a lot. So Friday night we start learning the reasons it happened I believe three high level open A.I. employees all resign right after this all goes down with Sam and Greg.
Sam and Greg as far as we can tell and I'm curious if you guys have heard anything about this immediately go to work spinning up a new A.I. company I think it was very obvious to everybody immediately that they could just like have a company with an LLC and a name and people would throw billions of dollars of investment at it.
So they started the things that have been reported are that they were building are they were thinking about building an A.I. chip company to rival Nvidia there's been the thing with Sam and Johnny I've been masa son working on A.I. hardware. Sam's largest investor in humane which is forever hilarious. Did you guys learn anything about what the like counter idea might have been if we landed in the world of Friday night where they just went off and started their own company.
No and I think it's actually important to to fill that in a little bit. I don't know if you are been fired. You know the first thing you do is you plot your revenge like very emotionally plot your revenge right. And that is what was happening that is what that communication was we'll just start a new cup like.
Some of these are still people they are very human people as we discovered through after actions of the weekend they might think they're the masters of the universe they might be playing with 80 billion dollars worth of shareholder value. But they are people like just deeply emotional flawed people just like everybody else and so that first wave was very much a revenge wave like they had no notice so they had necessarily no plan.
So we'll start a new company I can get the money everyone will come over that was a burst of communication that I think was rooted in just the emotion of the moment then I think everyone got some sleep.
And then we entered into Saturday where Alex and I broke the news that the investors were pressuring the opening I board to bring these folks back which blood into today and again the absolutely unpredictable outcome of today but I think the Friday night we're just going to go start a new company was just the first heated emotion of that moment.
And all the people around them were very much saying hold up like can we just control Z this thing and fix it like I heard like my interest is just fixing it you know like very directly from some people like I'm just trying to fix it this is ridiculous it should have never happened.
So I believe that put also Alex tell me if you agree with me on this or not I would assume that every venture capitalist on earth with Sam Altman's phone number called him on Friday night and said tell me how to give you money for your next thing for sure. So I mean is your point that like they should have just left and not tried to know I just I think Neely I think you're right but I also think the sort of parallel universe in which they went to start that company is not that far off.
Right I'm not saying I'm not saying it was impossible right it was it was a very easily accomplished thing I think you're correct the money was flowing the support was public right. You saw the node coastsla who runs coastal ventures just publicly tweeting how much you supported saying like the money was available from all of his existing investors probably from Microsoft right.
The thing that I'm just trying to underline here is that first wave on Friday night will start our own thing was reflexive it was not considered and I there there's a big gap between will support you and whatever next thing is and writing a check against a business plan. And that gap was as far as we can tell but know whatever thought about crossing that chasm.
Okay that's fair all right and so let's get to Saturday because that's when stuff gets even we're just somehow but first we're going to take a quick break we'll do it. Okay we'll do it. 10,000 and beyond open your online shop right away without having to learn how to code. Shopify helps to turn browsers into buyers and 15% better on average compared to other leading ecommerce platforms and in a pinch Shopify is award-winning help is there to support you 24.7.
Sign up for a $1 per month trial period at shopify.com slash decoder all lowercase go to shopify.com slash decoder now to grow your business no matter what stage of the day. No matter what stage you're in, shopify.com slash decoder. Because businesses that grow, grow with Shopify. Support for decoder comes from Mint Mobile. Right now at Mint Mobile, you can switch to anyone of their three month plans and they'll throw in another three months for free.
You can order and activate your plan from home and get unlimited talk and text for as little as $15 a month. How can they possibly pull that off? Mint Mobile ditched the in-person retail options and went entirely online and now they're passing all those savings onto customers. Every plan they offer comes with unlimited talk and text and high-speed data delivered on the nation's largest 5G network.
And if you're thinking about switching but worried about the hassle of tracking down a new phone, let me put those fears to rest. You can keep the phone you already have and switch to Mint Mobile effortlessly with ESIM. For a limited time, buy any three month Mint Mobile plan and get three more months free by going to mintmobile.com slash decoder. Call your wireless bill to $15 a month at MintMobile.com slash decoder. All right, we're back. So we've had the break up.
We've had the feelings, at least putting up angsty away messages and then Saturday morning in the Bay Area somewhere. I don't reconciliation begins. Neil, I take me through like the beginning of the story on Saturday. So what we had heard is the investors in OpenAI, which is mostly the commercial entity, they were putting a lot of pressure on, hey, we need to at least know what happened. We need to hear reasoning and we need to see if we can resolve this, the situation.
That led to what I am guessing is yet more Google Meet calls. And I just want to keep highlighting this because I think we are all imagining some like very tense in-person meetings. And really everyone was kind of just on the phone. I mean, we're all imagining the board room from succession, right? That's what's in everybody's mind as we go through this. Like a bunch of people sitting around a table raising their hands like with great intention.
I'm saying, I don't even know if their cameras were on. This is a lot of people who are like alone or like in small groups of people in various places. Also, just very important note, $10 billion from Microsofts can still not make you use Teams. It is the most important. So we start hearing there's all this pressure. And Alex actually hears, hey, they might bring him back. So Alex and I just start calling everyone. And we broke this, we beat, I don't remember who we beat.
But we beat someone by six minutes to the story that Open As Board is in negotiations to bring Altman back. And the most important piece of that story is he was ambivalent about it. That was reporting that we had. And his condition was, I'm not going to go work for these people again. They just fired me for no reason. They all have to go, which is understandable. Just an incredible condition to impose.
So even from that moment, like we get this reporting, we break the story, we're like, hi, five. And I'm thinking, and Alex is thinking, OK, to make this happen, four people have to publicly admit they made a mistake and resign in disgrace. Yeah. This is a high mountain. Who knows what will happen next? And then we spent the rest of the week on the phone. Yeah, Alex, what was your sense of whether those were kind of real requests, whether that was, again, Sam saying, I'd like to come back.
Here's my rationalist of what it will take. Or Sam being like, fuck me, fuck you. I think it was pretty clear that Sam had the upper hand as of Saturday, midday. And then we had reported that they had a 5 PM deadline to reach a deal with the board. And the thing that was going to happen at that point was if it wasn't reached, Sam's camp was telling the board, there's going to be mass resignations. The entire company is behind us. Is that why you think you had the upper hand?
Just because it was so clear so quickly that open AI as a company was behind him? I think what everyone underestimated is the resolve of what ultimately was three people to not have him come back. But at the, and the thing is like the board has been radio silent, you know, aside from that initial statement and an internal email that reiterated the statement to employees, Sunday night, no one from the board has said anything publicly. Nothing they haven't elaborated on anything.
So that's important. But it seemed like Sam was getting the upper hand. The 5 PM deadline passes on Saturday. I'm at a party and Neelye is like, where I'm like stepping aside and Neelye is calling me and we're like, what is happening? Does this mean mass resignations? And then we look on X. And I want to note, it is deeply ironic that all of this has been playing out on X because it's all training data for GROC. It's all training data for Elon's open AI competitor.
And this is all just a plan to poison GROC. You're like, GROC, how do I replace the CEO? And it's like, here's some ideas. Right. And it's also, there's a lot of deeper irony there with Elon, we can get into it at some point. But we saw this very public display of support for Sam Saturday night with pretty much everyone at OpenAI quote tweeting him with the hard emoji, right? Yeah. So Sam tweets something like, I love the OpenAI team.
And as if they had coordinated this in like a high school cafeteria, they all quote tweeted it with hearts. They all quote exactly, major high school cap fives. And then we're all thinking like, OK, this maybe means he won. Like we're all towards like, Elon, I was scratching our heads. And then you wake up the next day and you realize that was a pressure campaign to show that Sam actually did have the backing of the whole company. Yeah. And so we had reported this 5 PM deadline, 5 PM Pacific.
So that deadline just comes and goes. And we are scrambling texting everyone in the universe, like, what is happening? This was a deadline, right? Everyone's supposed to quit. So they start tweeting the hearts. And it was actually very unclear whether this was, we're all quitting right now or Sam has won. And the online reaction was like instantly polarized, right? Binary reaction, like people are like, Sam's won. It's done. And our instinct was, we would know, right? Like, this is cryptic.
We're doing high school away messages on X. It's absolutely not done. But we still don't know. And there was no further conversation after that. I was basically told, go to bed by a source. Like you're done for the day. Like, we did this thing. It's the show of force. Like, everyone has to go to sleep now. We'll try again tomorrow. So that was the end of that day.
I will say that my favorite conspiracy theory about this is that a misaligned AI was instructed to get people to watch the Las Vegas F1 Grand Prix, which started one at Hammystern. And I was like, this almost worked. Like, I almost watched this. But I went to bed anyway. Then we woke up the next morning, and we were, it was basically the status quo. Like, this pressure campaign had not moved anything. We were told, Karritch Wichery has reported this.
We were told that there was a noon Pacific deadline, which they blew right by. And then we reported again, there was another 5 PM deadline. So my response to that was, is this real? You can only issue so many 5 PM ultimatums in your life, especially in sequential days. And I was told, yes, this is a hard deadline. It's real today. Like, either this happens at 5 PM today, or we go in another path. And I thought, oh, man, how do I airport this?
And that is when Sam tweeted a picture of himself in the open AI offices holding a guest badge with the caption, first and last time I ever wear this patch, which is, right, that's the ultimatum. Like, either this is getting fixed, or I'm never coming back here again. And so that was when I felt comfortable saying, okay, it's like, we're doing the 5 PM thing again, but I've got the guy like issuing the ultimatum. Like, this makes sense to me.
Yeah. So then they then spent the whole day at open AI headquarters hashing this out. Basically having what I would assume is just the same fight over and over and over again. Sam trying to get the board to resign and disgrace and the board not wanting to resign and disgrace. There are some internal discussion there about picking the successors for the board. And the feeling, and we don't have this on site, but it's a little shakeier, but the feeling was that people were suggesting candidates.
We heard a lot of what I would call web 1.0 names. Cheryl Sandberg was in the mix. Like, right, Marissa Myers in the mix. Like, all these old heads who are from that era, you know, the adults, like we're gonna hire adult supervision for Google. Like, I was like, when is Eric Schmidt gonna show up? Right, like, these are the kinds of people we're talking about.
Yeah, I mean, if you saw a very public web 1.0 tech executive, like tweeting support of Sam over the weekend, they were most likely trying to get on the board. Dick Costello just appears that if no hair. At one point, Alex is like, these people are just like in the firmament they're available to show up and like run your company for a couple of years.
Like Brett Taylor, we should know, I mean, Brett Taylor, with like the guy who literally just negotiated the sale of Twitter to Elon and the second most dramatic boardroom tech situation of the last decade. Yeah, yeah. It's like, I keep calling him capital A adults, although no one here was acting like an adult, but like they, you know, they have that rep. Like, here's the cast of characters. And we heard that such an Adele was mediating this conversation, right?
And his point of view was he's pretty neutral. He just wants us over with. He needs, he needs a story to tell Microsoft shareholders on Monday morning. And that is Microsoft's interest is stability for shareholders because they have this massive dependency and opening on. And that was one of the other things we should have said on Friday is that this all happened while the markets were still open on Friday and Microsoft's stock, like tanked, as a result of this happening.
Like this was the biggest public blowback on this was going to come back to Microsoft in a pretty real way. So it makes sense that Nadella was going to be directly involved in doing this. And this ticking clock for Microsoft, I think it is underappreciated, but it was a very real that Microsoft needed a crisp thing to say on Monday morning, one way or another. So I always had it in the back of my head.
Like at some point, this has to hit some kind of resolution because Microsoft will not demand it, but will just create a resolution to say to a shareholders. So that there's all this like vetting of these old heads. The OGs come to town, right? So the vibe I'm getting, and again, we don't actually know if everyone was all together. You know, there was a lot of open AI people at that headquarters.
We don't know if the board was there actually, but the vibe we're getting is people are firing names at this board. And the board is not taking it seriously. And in the meantime, they are running their own search for a new CEO because their interim CEO, Miramarati, has sided with Sam in the meantime. Like publicly during the hearts campaign on Twitter, she's posting the heart, right? So she's what a sentence she's gone over. I mean, it is just absolutely childish.
When I say these are very flawed human people, like we're going to win this fight by posting hearts on Twitter is, I don't know what to say about it. One day I will like have had enough time to process that situation. But Miram has gone over to Team Sam, like very publicly. So the board needs a new CEO. So they're getting tossed these names. And everyone is hoping that they will accept some names and resign and the new names will take over. And in the meantime, they are looking for a new CEO.
And that is more or less what is happening all day Sunday as the 5 p.m. deadline draws every year. So we hit that deadline. And again, nothing. Alex, where was your head at the end of Sunday? Like obviously things get crazy several hours after that deadline. But where were we at the end of that day on Sunday, do you think? I was feeling like if we didn't have an announcement by five, it wasn't going to work out.
And we were kind of getting back channel that by midday Sunday, things were taking a turn. And I didn't obviously know and could have expected what actually happened. This is the most like I was saying at the top, bananas thing. But yeah, I think people were generally people who were close to the story were thinking like, OK, he made it very clear publicly. This is the last time he's setting foot in the building that deadline has passed. And it's not looking good.
And there's a version of that that would have been a very dramatic weekend that ended in a relatively OK thing, right? Sam and Greg go off to do something. They bring some opening eye people with them, opening eye, hires a new CEO, everybody moves on with their lives. Like that, there's a version of this where like a lot of people had a lot of feelings, but it turns into a relatively normal corporate change, right? But that is obviously not what happened.
Right. The negotiation to bring Sam Altman back has failed. Miramarati continues it is in terms CEO, Microsoft, which is Sam the best and says they'll support him in the new venture. Right. Again, the thing that needed to happen by Monday morning was a Microsoft statement to the market. And you really just cannot underestimate how much pressure that was applying to the situation. Like, yeah. So I'm expecting that statement, right? Like here's the forcing function.
We just have to be ready for this deal is going to fall apart. Microsoft is going to issue some holding statement and say, you know, we have a deal with open AI, everything's fine. Our contracts are rock solid Brad Smith or chief legal officers. A great lawyer like whatever Microsoft is going to say to calm everybody down.
But instead, and all credits to Bloomberg, Bloomberg has a report, I don't know, 10 minutes before the thing actually happens that Miramarati has hatched a plan as interim CEO to just rehire Sam and Greg as employees. So the board is out calling people to interview them to be the CEO to replace Mira.
And so what comes out in the end, I'll just like fast forward a little bit is Mira's plan was to quickly hire Sam and Greg as employees again, forcing the board to fire all three of them, which would have led to presumably lawsuit. Like who knows what was going to happen in that moment. But that was the last swing of chaos when it was, I think, obvious. Oh, this just fell apart. Like we're not in a place where we're negotiating for people resigning.
We're in a place where we're actively trying to create legal leverage for a lawsuit to come. And the board is actively trying to replace the person that they just hired to replace the CEO they fired. Sorry, it's just, I know it's just like this whole thing has been such a blur for Neelan. I like when you say all this out loud, it's just truly, it's insane. And it does seem like I think your instinct there's right, Neelan, that it's at that point what you're saying is, I'm not going to quit.
You have to fire me. Like I'm going to cause so much trouble for you that you're going to have to get rid of me and then I'm going to have ammo kind of in whatever direction I want to use it. Yeah, exactly. Right. And the rehiring of Sam and Greg is like a deeply funny idea. Like you have to fire them again. Just like hire them as interns and watch them get fired. Yeah. And we'll then sue the board and this is when Alex and I just started sending out hundreds of text messages.
This is about to fall apart. Like this is absolutely about to fall apart. And it fell apart and it fell apart in the weirdest way possible, which is the board just didn't even announce. Like the information broke. Yeah, this is just like coming from sources like the board has been in a bunker somewhere. They don't have a crisis comms team. They don't have like people speaking to the media.
They've just been radio silent, but it starts to trickle out that they've actually named a new CEO and it's Emmett Sheer. Not on my bingo card for who was going to be the next CEO of open AI. Not on anyone's bingo card. I think it's very safe to call this one out of left field. Emmett was the co-founder of Twitch, which is a live streaming video site. Not an AI company. He's not seen as a AI leader.
He posted shortly after it leaked that he was being named CEO that he got the call for the job that day and took a few hours to decide. And he's a free agent. He left Twitch earlier this year before MassLayoffs. They've had two rounds of layoffs since. I can confidently say that the vibe within Amazon is that Twitch has been a, hmm, how should I put this, a shit show since Amazon bought it. And so no one really thought of Emmett except the board, apparently.
He is now the CEO and he sent this note internally to employees saying that he was going to conduct an independent review of the board's actions, which is hilarious because he was hired by the board. I don't think that's possible to have an independent review when you are the person you are represented by the people that you're reviewing. I mean, it just doesn't make sense. And also those people can callously fire you whenever they want, which they've driven twice in 48 hours that they can do.
Okay. And we've been dancing around this this whole time. I really think at this point, we should just say who these people are because at the end of the day, three people set all this in motion. Three people have caused open AI to explode from within. So should we just get into that? Yeah. Yeah. Okay. So open AI is very strange in how it's structured.
And this is something that people haven't really been paying attention to because we've been so focused on just the success of their products with chat GPT, but open AI started as a nonprofit. And so it has this weird structure where there's a nonprofit. There's a flow chart, which is like perfect for Dakota. There's a flow chart on open AI's website. And I challenge you to look at this flow chart and try to make sense of it. It is one of the most confusing. I just want to be very clear.
You can definitely make sense of it. And they would draw it to be more confusing than it actually is. Okay. Well, that is 100% true. I'm going to redraw the flow chart now because it's all different. So there's this nonprofit with this board that controls it. And importantly, the board of open AI does not have equity in open AI, which is a really wild thing. And so that's the context of the board. There's three of them really that aren't open AI people.
So one of them is Adam DeAngelo, who is the CEO of Cora. He operates, I should note, a competing AI chatbot platform called Po. He was the original CTO Facebook. So he's a known quantity in Silicon Valley. He's a really well connected guy. There's a woman named Helen Toner, who has ties to the effect of altruism movement. She used to work at open philanthropy. She's now at Georgetown. She funds AI safety stuff.
She was actually on our stage at code in September with Casey Newton talking about AI safety. And then the other one is a woman named Tasha McCauley, who is the former CEO of GEO Sim Systems. And as far as I can tell, basically no one in tech that I know knows who she is. So that's the three people. And they are the ones who basically decide to bring Emmett in.
Because as we find out in the next turn of the story, the guy that we thought was the architect, the mastermind of all of this flipped, which we can get into. Yeah. So Emmett's a weird choice. Emmett's a weird choice. And also openly a decelerationist, which is a phrase that the AI can be low-seize. There's videos of him being like, this is terrifying. We should slow it down. This will extinguish all value in the cone of light, which is a real thing. He says, wow, it's amazing.
And his point of view is we should slow AI innovation way down so we can get a handle on how dangerous it is. Yeah. So you can see where the board is, right? This is a split that we've been hearing about the entire time. Open AI is playing with dangerous toys. And Sam is running too fast. So we brought an Emmett sheer to slow this whole thing way down.
Yeah. And then on the flip side, very early this morning, Neal, I think to your point correctly, to get something out before the stock market's opened. Microsoft announces it has hired Sam Altman and Greg Brockman to run. I believe the phrase is an AI research lab. An advanced AI research team is their statement. And can I just read this statement from Sachin Adela? Please do, which just contains magnitudes.
We remain committed to our partnership with Open AI and confidence in our product roadmap, our ability to continue to innovate with everything we've announced at Microsoft Ignite. And in continuous order, customers and partners, we look forward to getting to know Emmett sheer and OAI's new leadership team and working with them. And we are extremely excited to share the news at Sam Altman and Greg Brockman together with colleagues.
We'll be joining Microsoft to lead a new advanced AI research team. We look forward to moving quickly to provide them with the resources needed for their success. In the journalism business, we call that bearing the lead. And importantly, Sam Altman is being given the title of CEO at Microsoft, which is inside Microsoft's corporate politics, like a big deal. Right, there are not a lot of CEOs at Microsoft.
Usually when they acquire a big company, they give those people to CEO titles, the person who leads LinkedIn as a CEO title, the person leads GitHub as a CEO title. Deal Spencer is now the CEO of Microsoft Gaming. That's a big deal. You can go listen to that decoder episode where I ask him what that title shift means. It basically means he has his own resources. He split off from Microsoft, your own P&L.
Wow. Wow. It basically means you have your own resources and you are more of a free agent to run your little division like it's an own little company. So this is the arrangement Sam is getting. What I will tell you is I read this statement, especially that we look forward to getting to know image here. They don't know. They don't know these people. They don't know what's going to happen with open AI.
They don't know if Emma's going to turn the pace of innovation way down, but they are able to tell the market, hey, the face of the AI winning that we've been doing as Microsoft now works at Microsoft does Sam Altman have a contract to work at Microsoft yet? Like I don't know the answer question.
Does Sam Altman, the guy used to run Y Comator who has his hands in every startup in the universe has multiple investment funds is thinks of himself as the guy who was running the hottest AI startup in the world on its way to making AGI. Does he want to be a Microsoft employee? I truly do not know the answer to that question. I do know that this statement utterly worked to not only calm the market, but to send Microsoft stock skyrocketing.
And we are now sitting here saying, do we need to pre-write Microsoft is now a $3 trillion company because the stock as we are speaking is like to the moon. So this statement worked. I'm just cautioning everyone. This in my view is a holding state. It's still a holding statement. Well, I think knowing what we know about Sunday, knowing that Microsoft really wanted to have this buttoned up by markets open. This was decided like it was like almost like 1 a.m. Pacific. Yeah, I was asleep.
Like straight up, I was like, I'm done now. I'm thinking that like, okay, surely nothing more is to come and then it like around one to Dell tweets this and luckily Tom Warren is waking up in London and gets it on the site. It's nuts. But I think there's an important thing here, which is we know that Microsoft wanted to get this done. I have to imagine that whatever got Sam and Greg to agree to go to Microsoft was a lot.
I imagine they had all the leverage in that situation because they'll just go do their own thing, right? Like we've all been saying Microsoft cannot make it look like the company that they have literally bet their AI Azure future on is imploding before their very eyes. Yeah. And so I have to imagine this is going to go down as one of the best packages ever from a big tech company to a team to come there because they had all the leverage that night. I agree.
So this just will take this brings us to winners and losers. Wait, we're not done with the story yet. We're not. There's one more turn, but we're going to get to that. But first we're going to take a break. We'll get right back. Web agencies, you're going to like this one. Let me tell you about Wix Studio, the platform that gives agencies total creative freedom to deliver complex client sites while still smashing deadlines. How? First let's talk about the advanced design capabilities.
With Wix Studio, you can build unique layouts with a revolutionary grid experience and watch us element scale proportionally by default. No code animations add sparks of delight while custom CSS gives total design control. But it doesn't stop there. Bring ambitious client projects to life in any industry with a fully integrated suite of business solutions from e-commerce to events, bookings, and more and extend the capabilities even further with hundreds of APIs and integrations.
You know what else? The workflows just make sense. There's the built-in AI tools. The centralized workspace, the on-can visc-collaborating, the reuse of assets across sites, the seamless client handover, and that's not all. Find out more at Wix.com slash studio. Support for this episode comes from Contentful. Nowadays brands need to have an outstanding content base to separate themselves in an oversaturated market. That's because the content you put out is your customer experience.
It's how you interact, differentiate, and ultimately it's how you win. But to build those experiences, digital teams need an intelligent solution that can keep pace with their business goals. Contentful makes it easy to effectively manage, create, and build out your content, making a unique customer experience that's entirely around.
The contentful, composable content platform empowers digital teams to scale and launch experiences quickly and efficiently, easily collaborate on and deliver content across all of your channels without skipping a beat. Contentful allows you to bring your teams together to visually and intuitively build digital experiences.
Together, Contentful Platform Contentful Studio with its new experience builder for marketers and Contentful ecosystem makes it easier to collaborate, edit, and deploy unprecedented customer experiences faster. Contentful, where content drives business momentum. Get started today at contentful.com. All right, we're back. And we are back with the last and current turn of the story, which is a letter. So much of this all is just happening, people writing texts to each other.
It makes me very happy. Neil, since you're our quote reader for the day, do you want to read part of this letter? Yeah. It's truly spectacular. A bunch of open AI employees, they wrote an open letter to the board. Keep in mind, this all starts with a 5 p.m. deadline, which is there's going to be mass resignations unless Sam comes back. They've blown the deadline twice and Sam has now announced to go to Microsoft.
The markets think Microsoft has conducted the greatest aqua higher in tech history with no regulatory oversight. I have a version of that idea from like 5,000 people in my text message box, like Sachin Elles, genius. Okay, what no one is counting on is like, oh, people still want to do the plan. Right? Like, if you say you either hire Sam or we all resign, a lot of people are going to try to resign when you don't hire Sam back. So 500 plus employees out of with the 700 employees.
Yeah. I mean, by the time this episode comes out, it will have been the whole company. The letter says we, the undersigned, may choose to resign from open AI and join the newly announced Microsoft subsidiary run by Sam Altman and Greg Brockman. Microsoft has assured us that there are positions for all open eye employees at this new subsidiary should we choose to join.
We will take this step imminently unless all current board members resign and the board appoints two new lead independent directors, such as Brett Taylor and Will Hurd and reinstate Sam Altman and Greg Brockman. Importantly, Ilya has signed this letter and he has tweeted, I deeply regret my participation in the board's actions. I never intended to harm open AI. I love everything we've built together and I will do everything I can to reunite the company.
Mira has signed this letter and Sam is now, quote, tweeted Ilya with three heart emojis, which I just saying this. I want to point out we are talking about 10 to $8 billion in shareholder value is happening with heart emojis on Twitter. It's the most emo thing. I've listened to a letter to at least like 10 times this weekend because because when I was in college, I would just use the lyrics to letter to at least whether cures my aim away message.
That's where we are emotionally with this situation. This means the board might succumb to this pressure campaign because they're going to lose their entire company. All these employees are tweeting open AI is nothing without its people. The board might succumb. They might reinstate Sam. This whole Sam is now the CEO of Microsoft Research team might not come to pass. I truly do not know what happens next.
That's what I mean by Microsoft needed some clarity and they got it today in a move which maybe seems like Nadella is a genius, but also may have just created enough stability for the next chapter to play out. Alex, there are two things in here that jump out to me that I'm really curious about. One, this means Microsoft has made very clear, very loudly that anyone who wants to leave open AI can go work for Microsoft, which is a pretty ruthless thing to do to a company that you've been saying.
Are committed to our partnership and look forward to getting to know the leader and leadership team. The other thing is this is the final form of the board against the world thing. This is not quote tweets and heart emojis. This is literally the vast majority of the company saying in no uncertain terms, we will leave unless you do this. I'm always of the mind that it's one thing to make big noises about quitting your job. It's another thing entirely to quit your job.
This does feel like the board is going to have to call a lot of bluffs in a way that it's probably going to lose at this moment in time. Yeah, I mean, what I was hearing over the weekend is that Ilya is really the wild card here. He has a lot of respect internally. He's a co-founder. He runs the research teams. The fact that he flipped and is now saying, I'm also going to go to Microsoft means there really is no open AI anymore because that was always the key man.
Because if Ilya is still there, there's still a chance that they're not going to be this breakneck commercial entity that they have been under Altman, but they at least will do leading research because the research community respects him. If he is gone, it is literally Adam D'Angelo, Tasha McCauley and Helen Toner. Those people are going to be all that's left of open AI. He was kind of the truest believer.
If you wanted to pick somebody who was the most held on to the original vision of open AI, you'd probably pick Ilya. The Atlantic has this incredible in-depth story about open AI that everyone who's listening to this should go read. There is a scene where they had a leadership off site. I think it was last year. Ilya has a wooden effigy that he literally sets on fire at the meeting to represent non-aligned AGI, which is this is like the idea that they're creating AGI in an unsafe way.
It's kind of a religious thing in more ways than I think people get in the AGI community. If you want to understand the cultural divide, which is maybe where we go next here, but the culture divide within open AI has become somewhat religious in the last year. As the companies become commercialized. I told Alex that a real headline we should write after this is the rich people are crazy because this is religious fervor.
These are people who believe that they are going to create the power to destroy the universe. That is how they talk about it. It's not like an imposition of class warfare on billionaires. You should listen to the billionaires talk and you should listen to what they call effective acceleration and deceleration. There's a schism there that is beyond cultural. It is reached a level of religious fervor that is making them act irrational. It might be appropriate.
If you thought that the thing you were building could destroy the world, you should probably reach into some principles that are not just made up, which is how you find religion. But that's like there's no moderating force on that. There's no centuries of church dogma or literature. Whatever. There's some forum posts about effective accelerationism that they're all reading that they've just made up. That's weird. It's worth some scrutiny outside of the boardroom or chart battles.
That's where I like to focus my attention. There's something here that is making these people act irrational and with not just religious fervor, but with like martyrdom fervor. They will kill the company because they believe this is so right. What's great about this story is that this tension is actually personified in the org chart. It's like to how ridiculous it is that the way that open eyes structured, they have this nonprofit board that controls the company effectively.
They can fire people, etc. They get to decide when the company has reached AGI, which is a very important power to place in a company that's whole mission is around creating AGI. You have that one side of the equation. On the other side, you have the four-profit entity that open eye created under Sam Altman to raise all of the money from Microsoft, hire all of the top talent from all of the big tech companies that they have in the last year to build wildly successful commercial products.
Sam Altman is on stage at DevDay. I was there a couple weeks ago saying, we are going to be the app store for AGI. We are going to start sharing our revenue with you. We are going to give more of our technology to our developers. We are going to be a platform. Inherit in the structure is this tension where the commercial entity is charging ahead with something that the board is tasked with protecting and ultimately deciding.
Instead of drive behavior here, it's just really interesting to look at, maybe this was always going to happen. The favorite theory I've heard over the weekend was, this is actually Elon Musk's Poison Chalice because he named OpenAI, he really set it up, gave it its first donation, set up the nonprofit structure, and maybe this was always going to happen. Then it importantly stopped giving that money when he stopped being part of the company.
It was a big part of like semaphores reporting from a while ago. That was part of when OpenAI realized we need a lot more money to do the kinds of things. We're doing they went to Microsoft to get both the capital and the compute to do it and all of a sudden you're just kind of off to the races. As soon as you decide you want the money, it becomes very hard to not want the money anymore. That's one of the things we've seen over and over.
This idea that you can have a nonprofit overseeing a for-profit company is not unheard of in tech. It's fairly unusual, but Mozilla is a version of this kind of or chart signal is a version of this kind of or chart. It's possible to do, but it comes with a really complicated set of trade-offs in every case like Mozilla's thing and Neelya and I know you and I both talk to Mitchell Baker the CEO of Mozilla about this.
Mozilla's for-profit company gets most of its money from Google, which to Mozilla the nonprofit that wants to make the internet better feels really bad, but without that money you can't do the work anymore. This tension is never going to stop going away or this tension is never going to go away.
You eventually need somebody in charge who is either so mission driven that they stay that way no matter what or you get into the same ultimate thing where you eventually start chasing the money and then the money gets big and then that's what you become. So I said this earlier and I'm not going to try to describe in work chart on a radio show, but it is very true that the flow chart that OpenAI has published about its ownership structure is like consciously more complicated than it needs to be.
There's only three boxes on the structure. Most of the extra boxes are just labeling who owns what. So there's OpenAI, the public charity at 501C3, that owns a holding company which co-owns OpenAI the commercial entity with Microsoft. That's it. That's the whole structure of this thing. There's a charity that owns a holding company so that employees can have some equity on the holding company and then there's the commercial thing that goes off and does all the work.
That structure exists all over the place. It does not exist in Silicon Valley. Outside of Mozilla and these other things that are run, they're sort of not capitalistic in their way. Silicon Valley, everything is a Delaware organized C-Corp with VCs on the board and now all over the place super voting shares for founders. There's a way to do it and they do that because this stuff happens when you don't. That's why they do it. Founder or drama with their VCs, the story of Uber exists.
The story of Apple exists. Every single year meta, shareholders vote to remove Mark Zuckerberg. He just outvotes them because he has super voting shares. It just doesn't matter that the shareholders of meta are like, get this guy out of here year after year because he has super voting shares. You get a structure like this and these shenanigans become possible. Then you look around the world and you see functional structures like this at very big companies, at very important companies.
Someone pointed out to me that Bosch, which is a huge German engineering firm, very successful in the car world and the engineering world, is organized basically like this. There are companies that are owned by the towns that are in Europe. All these other structures exist in this work chart. People look at it and you look at it and it's crazy. If you just spend a few seconds looking at what these boxes mean and I don't know why some of them are ovals and some of them are squares.
It's just three boxes. At the end of the day, there's OpenAI, the charity that owns a holding company that owns OpenAI Global, which is the commercial entity in Microsoft is a big investor in that entity. That means Microsoft does not have a lot of control over this board, which I think has become a real problem for Microsoft at this point in time. It means that Sam Altman did not have super voting shares to stop it.
It also, very importantly, means that the board was too small and too inexperienced, made a hasty decision and there was no governance check on their behavior. I think that is the fundamental mistake of the structure, not the structure itself. We find out that I don't think this is the case, but I just want to play devil's advocate. We find out that OpenAI invented God in the last two weeks.
There's a clip of Sam Altman at a conference in San Francisco the day before he was fired saying that there's been a few moments in his career where they've gotten to push back the veil of ignorance. He was talking as if they had made fire and he said, one of these moments happened in the last couple of weeks. Everyone is reposting that clip saying, what if they realized they had AGI or what if they realized the model was about to just accelerate in a way that no one could have predicted?
I will say that Ilya has been doing a press tour and being pretty open that the model capability is going to progress a lot faster than everyone thinks. There has been a lot of theory to that, but what it looks like right now is inexperience and the board not realizing what was going to happen when they made such a rash decision. I just want to put this out there. The other thing I've heard is it's not that Microsoft and the commercial entity of OpenAI in Sam didn't think safety was a problem.
Kevin Scott, the head of AI at Microsoft, was on stage with me at code and we talked about AI safety and the limits and how careful they should be. This is a thing that Microsoft is publicly talking about. OpenAI's board is saying, okay, we're going too far ahead. Their entire job is communicating that there's a misalignment. Their entire job is saying to Sam, hey, you're over the line, like pull it back or we're going to fire you. Instead they just fired him.
Instead they just went ahead, they gave Microsoft one minute notice that they're going to fire Sam. The fundamental job of this board is to communicate and set limits and they just didn't do it. Yeah. This is another good moment to put a button on what you said earlier in Eli, which is that we actually don't know the whole story behind why he was fired in the first place. Emmett Sheer in his weird long tweet announcing that he is CEO.
At the very end says, PPS, before I took the job, I checked on the reasoning behind the change. The board did not remove Sam over any specific disagreement on safety. Their reasoning was completely different from that. I'm not crazy enough to take this job without board support for commercializing our awesome models. Before that, I'm like, okay, OpenAI wants to go back to being essentially a research organization. Fine. Whatever you want to say about that decision, that is at least a decision.
Now it's like, okay, well then what are we doing here? What fight are we having here? I'm sure there are people who know, but that part does not seem to have come out in any way that I find at all sort of satisfying. What I think we will find out is that this is a classic business dispute. I mean, yes, there are obvious concerns on different sides of the debate here about AI safety. I do think that played a role.
What we just saw was a couple of weeks ago, OpenAI hastily, and I can say this confidently because I was part of the press scram and getting pre-briefed in all this about the App Store stuff. Very hastily, OpenAI announced a major business expansion that Sam Altman led, right? They had this huge conference and we're like, we are pushing ahead. We're going to be a new platform.
And if I had to guess that probably led to a lot of this because Sam was clearly caught by surprise, there was nothing, you know, normally if this had been like a long gesticulating thing over months, it would have leaked in dribs and drabs and it really just came like a thief in the night. And so there was a breaking point here very recently and the thing I can point to is Sam getting on stage and saying, guess what? We've been going 100 miles an hour.
We're going to go 200 miles an hour and we're going to become an even bigger business. And what seems clear now is that a bunch of people at Microsoft, including Satya Nadella, saw that and said, hell yeah. And at least one person inside of OpenAI said hell no. Yeah, I mean, this is like essentially this is capitalism versus hippies. I mean, that's what the story is. It's the story of Silicon Valley, man. Yeah. I think that's irreductive.
Again, the religious aspect of this is just not to be underestimated. Microsoft sees this and says, yeah, go even faster because every one of these queries runs on an Azure server. Yeah, right. Right. That's great for them. They're ready to go.
The OpenAI board sees this and says, okay, you're going to give people the ability to make computers go take actions in the real world without any oversight and let them build whatever AI tools on our model that they want and resell them and create a commercial incentive to do that without any safety checks whatsoever. And that is opposed to our mission. That is like real. That is a moral dilemma. Do you remember, I mean, we were just talking about this on the Vergecast.
We were talking about how this store and these eight, this agent API thing is going to open them up to a world of hurt. I mean, they literally had to say on stage, we will endem the fight. We will endem the fight for you for any copyright violation that may occur from creating bots on our platform. It was very, and like I went to a Q&A with Sam after they announced this at DevDay and it was clear that they had not thought through the details, right?
Like they hadn't decided on how much revenue they were going to share with creators, how the store incentives were going to be aligned. It was all just being done kind of on the fly and we were all going like, this sounds like a disaster. Like it's a smart business play. If you are Sam Altman, the venture capitalist, right, it's like, yes, this is what you want to go do. You want to build a moat around the fastest growing consumer product of all time.
You want to be a platform, but it was clear that they were moving a million miles a minute. Yeah. Also, the problems are not hard to imagine. Okay. You creator sets up a GPT bot that just spams people in their email with marketing messages. Does OpenAI want to be sharing revenue with that creator? Is that a thing you want to incentivize? You can make it even worse. It's connected to Dolly, right? Okay. You want to make deep fake news of people and that's an app you want to sell in the GPT store.
Does OpenAI have the content moderation ability to stop it? It's scale when millions of people realize this is a thing they should try to sell. The most wild thing I heard at DevDay was that OpenAI uses GPT to moderate GPT. It uses the AI to moderate the AI and that's how they were. That's how they were going to approach the store. Yeah. It's truly bananas. Yeah. There's a lot still to sort out here, right? I think including the question of, does Sam Altman actually ever work for Microsoft?
I think we're going to talk about this a lot for a long time, I suspect. Let's just put a button on this moment for now because if we stay on here too long, more news will break in the next couple of days. We need to put this thing on the internet. Five minutes, I want to do real quick, who won and who lost over the last four days and then we're going to get out of here. I'm just going to throw some names at you and you guys are going to tell me winners and losers. Sound good?
I mean, it sounds like an impossible exercise. It's going to be great. I'm excited about it. Here we go. Person number one, Sati and Adela. I feel like a big winner of the weekend, right? He might be the only winner. Okay. Everyone thinks he looks very clever today. I do not know long term if having your stock price swing this much on the actions of one or two people is a good thing for Sati and Adela. Fair. Okay. Person number two, Sam Altman. I genuinely can't decide. Loser. Huge, huge loser.
Really? Yeah. With our questions. Huge loser. He was the guy. And now he might still be. He might start a new company. He might go work for Microsoft. He might take everyone with him. But losing the thing you founded is the worst. And it might be that he returns to open AI in 12 years like Steve Jobs. But in the meantime, right, the most likely outcome is he owns next. This is Elon Musk style Joker origin story. Is that? Yeah. I don't. There's no. I come back to the very beginning.
It's great to think that all these people are cogs in the machine and it's a narrative that's playing out. And it's a pull. And like, you know, people write about it that way. Sometimes we write about that way. These are people, you know, and like whatever he does next is going to be deeply colored by just the emotional damage of this weekend in the sense that he can't trust the people he thought he could trust.
And maybe that's just the reality of being the guy who ran white combinator for a long time. Maybe he was already like that, you know, he's been in the scene for a long time. He knows a lot of people. But to go from the top of the world to Microsoft employee in 48 hours, no matter what happens next, he is not the winner today. I think he is more a winner than Neely, but I don't think he's a full winner.
I mean, I think like Sam, like I was saying, looks like he had all the leverage with Microsoft. Microsoft needed a way to message that this was under control. I imagine he extracted some insane deal terms out of Nadella weight last Sunday night. And if he does get the entire open air team to come to Microsoft and he gets to run it like his own little thief. I'm like, LinkedIn has its own email, right? Like it's its own building. It's own. Do you think he gets to use Google me? That's well.
Well, maybe that, you know, that may have been the biggest concession of all. Was it Nadella agreed that they don't have to use teams internally? We'll find that out. I'm sure Tom is on that. But I mean, I'm thinking to why they created the commercial entity. It was because they needed funding for compute to train their models. And Microsoft showed up with the bag mostly of cloud credits, interestingly, saying, we will give you all the compute you need.
Microsoft has gone on what I've seen some analysts saying is the most expensive, infra, private company, infra build out of all time with its AI data centers, something like 50 plus billion dollars in the last few years. So if Sam gets the insulation of being an independent company within a mega cap company and all of the resources that he was desperately trying to raise money for for the last few years anyway, and all the people from the company, I mean, it seems like he wins.
I mean, you know, like, I don't like he seems like a winner to me. Certainly, this is like for his like, yeah, trusting people, not great, but I think he's more a winner than you. All right. I have a bunch more, but I actually think I think you're right. Most of them are pretty easy. Open AI, obvious loser. Google, winner loser. Google is the most indicated of any company right now, right? They got so much heat for being slow and not rushing this stuff to a market.
And now they're vindicated because Open AI itself just tore itself apart over the idea of going a little bit slower. And Microsoft, which is recall Nadella on decoder, I want to make Google dance. I want them to know that it was me who made the dance. Incredible quote is now having to start a new division, set it up, give it research funding while navigating meeting Emmett Sheer, which is literally in the statement. They have to meet this guy.
Like if you're Google, you're like, wow, we were right to go slowly and carefully in our moment will come to us. So we have better distribution for our AI search product than anybody in history. Like maybe we'll just continue to steam our way industry. I don't know if that's going to happen. I don't know if Google can actually execute. There are many, many questions. But if you are Cinderella, today, you're like, pew, miss that one. You're just fine. I think that's right.
I think that this is the most aggressive wrench of instability into its biggest competitor that Google could have possibly hoped for. Bard still sucks though. So there's that. Anthropic. Do you brought this up earlier? Is the team of Anthropic just giggling and high-fiving right now? I mean, yeah. Anthropic was created for a similar reason. I don't know if there was a coup that was failed. That's why Anthropic got formed, but they all worked at OpenAI.
They were the more decelerationous, effective altruism movement. They broke off as a separate faction created another AI lab. They haven't had the commercial success of OpenAI. I think it's worth noting that the only AI startup that has been successful commercially is OpenAI. There's Claude, there's all these chatbots. They're usage pales in comparison. Yeah, I think they are winning because of the instability. Maybe they'll be able to hire some of these people.
But I really think everyone lost here except in the short-term Nadella and Sam Altman. I really do. In the short-term every Microsoft employees thinking about selling their stock to my house. Yeah. People tweets of just the screenshot of the stock price saying thank you, Satya Nadella. Yeah. All those people won. Did anybody else win? I remains to be seen. Fair enough. Okay. Last one. And then we should get out of here. Chat GPT. Is this the end of the chat GPT era?
Is it even the end of the story? I don't know. Okay. Fair. If we play this out in what seems like the most likely scenario right now, which is that OpenAI becomes significantly knee-capped in some meaningful way, it seems unlikely to me that all of the stuff that we saw two weeks ago at DevDay comes out the way that we thought it was going to. It seems possible that this organization goes back to being more of a research organization.
And chat GPT, the fastest growing consumer internet product in history, becomes a side show for this company again. I mean, if there's no one there to operate it. Yeah, there's certainly that. I mean, that's where we are right now is like there may not be an OpenAI by the end of the week, right? Yeah. Like chat GPT probably over. There's just wild, but they'll just recreated inside Microsoft. And it won't be as cool and it won't be as like, you know, breakneck and move fast break things.
Microsoft is like a regulated monopoly. They're going to move very slow and thoughtfully on how this is rolled out because they have to, right? So yeah, I do think this marks, this decidedly marks the move fast break things era of generative AI. I think that's pretty safe to say. Thanks a lot. Without a question. The like craziest rise and fall of an app I can think of unless Microsoft just takes it. Like I do not know what happens.
So like we're going to, we're going to end this podcast and I'm going to go think about the art chart a little bit more. And by the time I'm done looking at the boxes, everything might be different. And I think that is again, the weirdest outcome of all of this is we still don't know. It's been, we might be on to six CEOs of OpenAI by the end of this week at the rate we're going. It's one of the board members is going to become the CEO until there's only one of them left. It is not.
And it is, I think one of the most riveting corporate dramas of our time, it is also just frankly one of the saddest. Yeah. Agreed. All right. I think we're done here. Neal, you want to, you want to take us out? That's it. That's a verchast. That was also decoder. We love hearing what you think of our shows. You can send us emails at verchast. At verchast.com or decoder at the verch.com. We read them all. You can follow us all on threads where we broke a lot of news this weekend.
Sign at the time for threads. I will say, although most of the action was still happening on X, a lot of it happened on threads. And very importantly, you can subscribe to Alex's newsletter command line, which I am 100% confident without having asked Alex first is going to be full of scoops about what's happening at OpenAI for the next 500 weeks to come. I hope so. I sure do. That's it. Proc. No. And that's it for the verchast this week. Hey, we'd love to hear from you.
Give us a call at 866-111. The verchast is a production of the Verge and Box Media Podcast Network. Our show is produced by Andrew Moreno and Liam James. That's it. We'll see you next week. For this show comes from NPR. What do labor strikes, climate change, and your crappy office printer all have in common? Simple. They all have issues with money. Money is everywhere, fueling our lives, altering our environment and driving behavior all over the world.
If you're curious to learn something new and exciting about economics every week, you can listen to the Planet Money Podcasts from NPR. Planet Money takes the world of complex economy and makes it make sense, where human stories supersede abstract theories. This is Econ Bound Earth. Listen now to Planet Money from NPR, wherever you get your podcasts.