We know so much more about the universe than our ancestors did. Go far enough back, and they didn't even know that the pinpricks of light they see in the sky are other suns. A few thousand years ago, they had no idea how far away those other stars were, and a few decades ago nobody knew for sure whether they were planets around those stars. We know so much more than they do, But we've also visited exactly the same number of solar systems as they have, just the one.
Will we ever get out of our solar system and make a home for humanity around an alien star? Is there a physics obstacle? Or is it just political will or lots of engineering. If it's actually impossible, that might explain another great mystery why no aliens have visited us. Maybe we aren't alone in being marooned on our home stars. Maybe everyone is just stuck at home. Today on the pod, we'll dive into the challenges, the technologies, and the potential
for taking humanity to those distant stars. Welcome to Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Accessible Universe.
Hello.
I'm Kelly Winer Smith. I study parasites and space, and if I could travel to the next nearest star, I wouldn't.
What about you, Daniel, Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist, and I want to send somebody to the nearest star, but I definitely don't want to go myself.
So why would you not want to go yourself? Can you imagine all the physics stuff you could ponder and maybe even figure out on an interstellar trip.
Oh yeah, I'd be desperate to talk to the aliens about physics, to see what kind of weird technology they've invented. But I'm just not that much of a traveler these Honestly, I don't even like to get on an airplane, So a spaceship absolutely not. The seeds you're gonna be uncomfortable and the snacks are gonna be weird. You know, I'm a homebody these days.
But you were born in one country, lived in another country, and had kids in a third country.
Right.
You used to be an amazing traveler, but now it's home.
Huh time marches on? Absolutely? Yes, I can no longer sleep anywhere anytime. My stomach is more sensitive. You know, youth is wasted on the young.
Well, it sounds like you made good use of your youth traveling all those places.
How about you, Why don't you want to go to another planet.
If we ended up in another planet and there was life there, that would be incredible. But I feel like you don't necessarily know what you're gonna get until you get there. But the thought of leaving, Like, so it's spring while we're recording, which means in the next couple weeks on the side of my barn, the light that's on outside is going to attract little tree frogs and all kinds of colorful moths. I just can't imagine leaving this planet and leaving all that stuff behind to spend
like decades traveling in a tin can. But maybe they'd have even better moths, and then I would feel regret.
It'd be amazing, though, if we got to that planet and then we're like, this place is kind of ugly, you know. I wonder if, like every planet has its own beauty, or if our evolutionary history on Earth primes us to only find, you know, the Sierras and the Blue Ridge Mountains beautiful. See how I included Virginia.
I appreciate that. Yeah, No, we're being nice to each other on this episode. I guess that's great. I also it would really stink to know that you were never going to see any anybody else that you had known your whole life ever again. And like the farther away you get, the harder it is to communicate. But so let's dig into the to the meat of our discussion today, and we're talking about is it possible for humans to travel to other stars?
Yeah? And I think this question is interesting and important because while we want to explore the universe robotically and gather information telescopically, I think also we have a primal need to explore, to go places, and to expand out into the universe. I think it's a question a lot of people have about whether it's possible today, whether it might be possible in a thousand years, or whether it might never be possible for humans to cross the vast
oceans of space to other stars. So I went out and I asked our listeners if they thought it was possible. If you would like to play for this part of the podcast in the future, please don't be shy. Write to us at questions at Danielankelly dot org. We would love to have your voice on the pod. So think about it for a minute. Do you think it's possible for humans to travel to other stars? Here's what our audience had to say.
We can imagine traveling to other solar systems, but can we deal with all the questions radiation, food, power sources, generationships. We just don't know enough at this point.
I would say no for the foreseeable future, but in multiple generations, after multiple generations, I think that would be possible. What it would take thousand of years and the ship would have to survive. You'd go through accidents, there would be warring factions on the ship. You need a multi generational ship.
Well, I'd say it's possible, but not probable within the next one hundred years. There are a lot of hurdles to overcome, propulsion being a major one in supplies. Maybe if you had a fusion powered plasma or something.
I bet we could get a human being there in their lifetime with acceleration that won't kill them, But I think stopping will be really hard and definitely turning around will be nearly impossible, so they can't come back.
Humans don't have enough time to live, and our bodies would be destroyed by the acceleration required to reach another solar system.
With today's technology. I don't believe it is strictly possible. I think it's definitely possible. There's no law that says we couldn't do it. There's still some major challenges ahead of us. Anything is possible, but humans traveling to another solar system may be a stretch. Now it is impossible.
I don't think a single person could make it to another solar system, but maybe multiple generations.
Even if you could travel at the speed of light, it would still take years to get to the nearest star, which we don't even know if there's a solar system around, and you'd have to confirm that first. Even if we could technology got better, we'd still probably need a generational star here.
Unless we destroy ourselves with war or refusal to confront climate change. We will eventually reach other solar systems.
Maybe if money isn't a problem in the future, if we tackles certain things, maybe we could. But I think it's for now the ultimate pipe dream.
Yes it is possible, but whether it is probable is a different question. And even if it is probable, and even if it's undertaken, I don't think that the humans who would leave our solar system to get to the other solar system would be alive. When we get to the other.
Solar system, we should assume that the aliens at the solar systems will be hostile, and therefore we should send all the people that we dislike the most.
Maybe through like a cryo sleep or human hibernation type thing, something like that.
I believe we are marooned here.
No, we can't do that right now, but maybe some day in the future.
From a physical point yes, From engineering point likely no.
I loved the variability of answers that we got here, and I should say that as someone who interacts with the space settlement community, I have no doubt that even if somebody were to say, like, we've made a generationship, there's a one percent chance it's going to make it. Every seat on that ship would get filled. So, you know, I think there's a lot of people who really love this idea.
Well, why do you think we would have no shortage of volunteers? You think there are people who, like in reality, would actually sign up to go. They're not just like excited about the concept.
Oh my gosh, they send me angry emails. There have been so many people who have written me to tell me that I cannot stop them from settling space, and I write them back and I say, I cannot stop you. That's right, And I'm not crying too. I don't think I have any power over these kinds of decisions. I just wrote a book saying it's kind of dangerous.
And maybe we should think this all through before we go.
But hey, do what you want, Yep, yep, do your things. So anyway, I'm sure there'd be a lot of people, and you know, it would be an absolutely incredible thing if our species did send a generationship, for example, to another star.
It would be incredible. And I love how this topic is so deeply inspired and informed by science fiction. You know, obviously there's science here, and we're going to talk about all the nerdy details of propulsion mechanisms, et cetera. But so many the ideas here come from the creativity of science fiction authors casting their minds forward to imagine what we might be able to build, what we might need to build, what we might have to do to survive.
Yeah, what is your favorite interstellar travel sci fi book?
Oh?
Wow, such a good question. One of my favorites is a book by Alistair Reynolds. I think it's called the House of Suns, in which they tackle this problem by
dragging stars closer to each other. So they want to have like a galactic empire across many solar systems, but they don't have faster than light travel, and they recognize that it's basically impossible to govern somebody if you're there so far away, So they bring a bunch of suns closer to each other, make a little solar neighborhood, so you can have different solar systems but they're not so far away.
I like that idea, but it sounds kind of dangerous.
Well, we're going to talk about that technology, which isn't as far fetched as you might imagine at the end of the episode.
So let's go ahead and dig right in. But first, let's talk about where would we be going. Where is our closest option here?
Yes, so the Milky Way galaxy has hundreds of billions of stars, but the whole thing is like one hundred thousand light years across, which is really big, and the density of stars in our neighborhood is not so high. It actually varies a lot. In the center of the Milky Way. It's much much denser. But around where we are, we're like in the suburbs, not quite the ex serbs,
in the very fringes of the Milky Way. But out here in the suburbs, you can expect to find a star a few light years away, and that's what we find. Alpha Centauri and Proxima Centari are like just around four light years away. So if you wanted to get to the nearest star uneasy mode, you'd be going to the closest one. It's still four light years away. And remember
the speed of light, super duper fast. If you shined a laser beam at one of these stars, it'd be zipping through the cosmos at an incredible speed for four full years before it got there.
And so say you get to Alpha Centauri, do we know that there are earth like planets there that we could try to explore? What would we see once we got there?
Yeah, there's actually good news there. You know, until like twenty ish years ago, we had no idea what planets were like around other stars, or if there even were any. We'd only ever seen the planets in our Solar system until the mid nineties, when we started developing the technology to see exoplanets. Now we specifically identified five thousand exo planets. At least the number keeps going up and up and up and up. It's like a real pivot point in
human history. And because of that we can make all sorts of really interesting statistical statements, like, on average, stars have a good number of planets, and specifically Proximusentari and Alpha Centauri do have some planets, and so it's very unusual actually for stars to have no planets as far as we can tell. So if you're going to go to a nearby star, it's very likely you'll find some
planets there. Whether they're Earth like and whether they are capable of supporting life a whole other question that we think the next generation of space telescopes will really help us crack. But from the point of view today's conversation, let's just imagine getting to that Solar system, not necessarily finding a cozy how there.
Okay, so let's see I'm forty two. Now, if I were going to jump on one of these ships, and I was hoping that we would arrive by you know, the average lifespan of a human woman, So what that's like eighty six or something like that. So we've got let's say we've got about forty years to get there. How fast do we need to go?
Yeah, so if you traveled at the speed of light, you get there in four years. Of course, you can't travel at the speed of light because nothing that has mask can travel at the speed of light. So let's say you could go at ten percent of the speed of light already blazingly fast, much much faster than any human ship has achieved crude or uncrued. But if you did somehow manage that, you would get to altha centauri in about forty years, right, a tenth of the speed
of light four light years, so forty years. So that's basically what you need to achieve. But the sort of space technology we have now really just isn't capable of that. Like the fastest crude rocket or the Space Shuttle, for example, their top speeds would take them about eighty thousand years to get there, not to mention the question of like bringing in a fuel that will dig into in a minute. And even the uncrewed stuff like the Parker solar Probe
is the fastest thing humanity has ever built. Its top speed is about zero point zero six four percent of the speed of light. Oh no, you take about seven thousand years to get to Alpha Centauri. So nothing we've built can go nearly fast enough to get Kelly to Alpha Centauri before her eighty fifth birthday.
Oh that's right. I wasn't going to go anyway, although maybe maybe if they had really great moths. I'm disappointed. But so I feel like there's there's a couple problems here. It's like, one, can you even get to the speed that you want? But then two, how do you get to that speed? Because like, if you're sending humans, we've got these squishy bodies, and if you accelerate us too fast, we like we break and smoosh, and so you need to like get fast but not too fast.
Yeah, so there's a lot going on here. I mean, one thing is just the limitation of relativity. Number one. You can't get faster than the speed of light. We'll talk about warp drives in a minute, but assuming that you're going through space, through flat space, you can't travel faster than that. And that's a hard limit. And I think it's important for people to think about that as sort of setting the length scale of the universe, Because we talked a minute ago about like, wow, it's super
duper fast. It is super duper fast. But space is vast compared to the speed of light. Like, we wouldn't think space was so big if the speed of light was ten times or one hundred times what it is, because then these things would be like less than a light year away, or we would think space was much
bigger if the speed of light was smaller. So the speed of light sort of determines like what is far and what is close, And it just so happens that because of our galactic dynamics, things are a few light years away instead of tenths of light year away. But even if you're not going to get to the speed of light, this limit at the speed of light makes it hard to accelerate. Like you keep pouring energy into your rocket, you're not going to increase your velocity by
the same amount. As you go faster and faster, it takes more and more energy to increase your velocity. And as I think you were hinting, there are also limits on how quickly you can accelerate, like biologically.
Yeah, so that's the interesting part.
Well, it's true that we do want to deliver our passengers to Alvis Centauri, not as bags of dead goo. Right, we want to take care of all their fragile little organs and make sure that they actually get there. And so if you want to get to some sort of reasonable speed so your trip doesn't take too long, you need to accelerate, and humans are not really built for
huge acceleration. I was reading some papers that said the humans can tolerate like twenty G of acceleration G there, of course referring to the acceleration of gravity here on Earth as basic standard units of one G. So twenty G is pretty intense, and we can't really tolerate that for more than like a few seconds, maybe ten seconds. Humans, like the really tough ones, can tolerate like ten G for a minute, five G for a few minutes. But imagine being on this ship. You're going to be on
it for years at least. You don't want more than like one G or maybe even two G for long periods.
You know, we got a lot of the early data on how many g's humans can survive because there was the one scientist who kept getting in a sled and then slamming himself into a foam wall. And so anyway, human ingenuity. I love it, so just to make sure I have the physics understanding of this. So like if you speed up and then you stay at that speed, you only experience the G as you're accelerating, right, not just because you're going fast, but because you are going faster every second. Is that right?
That's right? Okay, that's right. You can't experience velocity directly. It's a relative thing right inside your ship. You can't tell how faster ship is going. But if your ship turns on the engines and tries to increase its speed, you can measure acceleration locally. It's not relative, So as your ship tries to increase its speed, you can feel that.
And something that's sort of surprising to me is that you can actually accelerate at one G and reach near the speed of light in a reasonable amount of time. Like if you're on a rocket that can do one G of acceleration, you can just do that for a year, and you'll get up to like ninety nine percent of the speed of light relative to your departure location.
And in that case, you would get there in less than forty years. Right, because now instead of going ten percent the speed of light, you're going the speed of light.
Yeah, that's right, but you need a technology that can provide one g of acceleration for a whole year, as we're going to talk about. That's not so easy to do, right. That's an enormous amount of thrust or momentum you're imparting on your ship.
There's always something in the way.
There's always something in the way. And the flip side of all of this is deceleration or negative acceleration, because you could get up to near the speed of light, and then you could get to Alpha Centauri, but then you're going to be in that Solar system for about zero point zero seven seconds if you're traveling at near the speed of light. But what you want to do
is arrive there and stop, which means decelerating. And you don't want to decelerate from the speed of light to zero too quickly, otherwise you'll again go splat.
Yeah, humans, it's a shame. We're so squishy.
And I think on the next episode we're going to talk about making humans less squishy by like turning into human sickles, and that might be a better way to accelerate human bodies. I don't know, you'll have to tell me all about it.
We are going to talk about the human side of things in the next episode. I'm not sure that human sickles is on my outline, but we'll see what I come up with.
It is now, because I'm going to ask you about it.
Okay, great.
And so a typical strategy is to accelerate on the first half of the trip and then basically turn your ship around and decelerate all the way back to your initial velocity now relative to your destination. And so you accelerate and you reach top speed momentarily halfway there, and you turn around and you're slowing down the whole second half of the trip. And this is actually kind of cool because along the way you might want to feel some artificial gravity. As you're probably going to tell us,
humans don't like to float in space forever. It's not good for us, and so you want to feel one G. And so having one G of acceleration and then one G of deceleration the whole trip is actually kind of cozy.
So if you had one G of acceleration for one year, you would still have what two or three years just staying at that velocity before you start decelerating, so there would be a period where you would have no g's in between.
Yeah, absolutely, depending on the length of the trip. If you wanted to go further. For example, you could accelerate at one G for a year, get up to near the speed of light, zoom around super duper fast, and then flip around and decelerate. So, yeah, you can have a period in the middle where you're not accelerating or decelerating. Then you got to solve that gravity problem another way, all right.
All right, and we'll talk about that in the next episode.
And that's not the only thing that's going to potentially kill you along the way. You know, we think of space as empty, but it's not really like there's a lot of particles out there. There's huge amounts of gas the interstellar medium. There's lots of little bits of tiny rocks. We call that dust. It's out there, and if you're traveling at relativistic speeds relative to that dust, you can
be in danger. You know, these tiny particles, A millimeter sized particle at like even if half of the speed of light is an enormous amount of energy deposited on your ship. And so you got to really worry about this and cosmic rays and radiation, So your ship has to be pretty robust. You need shielding, you need like titanium or water or lead or something. All this is
going to make your ship heavier. So we'll dig into that more in the next episode where we talk about the fragility of the human body and how to survive this. But keep that in mind as we're talking about the propulsion designs, because it's going to affect how much you got to move on the way to another star.
So to me, the dust feels like the first showstopper that we've encountered. What makes us think that, you know, when each piece of dust hitting us is like getting hit with a bomb, what makes us think that we can like, I mean, we're clearly not going to dodge the dust. So what is the dust solution?
Well, you know, I've read about some cool shields. There's like these whipple shields. I basically break up the dust into smaller pieces so that none of them are likely to like, really be devastating. There's some cool technology like self healing shields. So I think it's an engineering problem and one that we're likely to be able to crack. But Yeah, it's definitely an important one.
I love your optimism, Dan, I always love your optimism, all right, So we're going to be talking about ways to get there. Are the ways that you're going to talk to us about ways that could get us there in a lifetime or is there anything else that might work for us here?
Some of these solutions really can get you there in a lifetime. But because it's physics, time is a slippery concept, like are we talking about the lifetime for the people you left behind or lifetime for people on board? Because as soon as you get up to really high speed
relative to your departure planet, those are not the same thing. So, for example, say you accelerate at one G and you get up to near the speed of light, you could travel for just a few years your time, a decade your time, and like one hundred thousand years will have passed back home. And if you're traveling near the speed of light, one hundred thousand years is enough time to get you across the galaxy in only like a decade of your time. So Kelly gets on board the ship.
She arrives at the other side of the Milky Way that no human has even clearly seen before because all a gasl and dust and she's only fifty ish. Meanwhile, back home, Zach is one hundred thousand years old.
Oh my gosh. And I'm a narcissist. So what I care about is how long it takes me. When we say it's gonna take eighty it would take like eighty years to get there if you went ten percent the speed of light. Is that that's eighty my years as a person on the ship, right, So our frame of reference is always the people on the ship.
Well, it was gonna take forty years to get there at ten percent the speed of light in human years, but at ten percent the speed of light is not that much of a relativistic time dilation effect. That really kicks up when you go half or three quarters the speed of light, So that's still going to be decades earth time and ship time. If you do get like up above fifty sixty seventy percent the speed of light, then you start to benefit from these time dilation effects.
So on the ship it takes less time.
Got it, Okay? And on the next episode we're going to talk about generationships where if you just accept it's not going to happen in a lifetime. Because your technology can't get you that fast, how do you carry generations of humans to still get there? But we're going to take a break now, and when we get back from the break, Daniel's going to walk us through our rocket
options for our trip to the stars. All right, let's talk about our transport methods to get us to Alpha Centauri, starting with the most near term likely technology.
So we want to get to Alpha Centauri, which means we've got to move away from Earth, which means we need to gain momentum away from Earth. In our universe, momentum is conserved. So you have your ship. You wanted to gain momentum in one direction, there needs to be some sort of compensating momentum in the other direction. This is something you feel if you like fire a gun, for example, you feel that kickback. That's the conservation of momentum.
The rifle is shooting the bullet super duper fast, but the bullet has a small mass, and the rifle itself has that larger mass is moving backwards in the other direction with the compensating velocity.
See I always imagine it as I'm trying to get a boat to move and I'm imagining Daniel on a cruise ship taking all of the white chocolate and throwing it in the ocean to get the cruise ship to move faster while also getting rid of the bad chocolate.
Yeah, that's exactly right. You need to build momentum in the other direction. So imagine you are on a boat and you're tossing stones or equivalently, white chocolate or hot garbage or whatever useless stuff you happen to have on the boat. Right, you create momentum in one direction for the stones, and in recoil you go the other way. And so all rocket drives operate under this same principle. You need two things. You need energy and then you
need mass. So you use the energy to throw the mass out the back and you go the other way. That's the way all the rockets we're going to talk about work.
And that's how like the Falcon nine or starship works when it takes off too right.
Yeah, exactly. And the issue here is that you need something to produce that energy, and you need something to throw out the back, and when you run out of that, you can't go anymore. And because you have to bring that fuel with you, you need enough fuel to push that fuel, and then you need more fuel to push that fuel. And so there's this famous rocket equation which tells you like how much fuel you need to get up to
a certain velocity. It depends on the mass of the ship and also depends on the specific impulse that your engine is able to provide. It's just basically just like a number. Some of them are high, some of them are low. But the bottom line is that the math tells us that there's an exponential need for fuel. If you want to get up to higher velocity. So you want to go twice as fast, you don't need twice
as much fuel, You need much much more. You need exponentially more fuel, and as you increase that velocity, the amount of fuel grows ridiculously. So for example, even like the Saturn rockets, the ones that took us to the Moon, when they launched, they were like ninety five percent fuel. It's mostly fuel being taken off and that fuel is mostly being used to push the rest of the fuel.
That absolutely blew my mind when I first learned it that like less than ten percent of that giant that you know, that giant tube was actually going to be going to the Moon.
And people are often confused about rockets versus escape velocity. Remember, escape velocity is a calculation you do if you're like throwing something from the surface of the Earth, you need a certain velocity because gravity is going to slow you down, and if you have higher than the escape velocity, you can leave the orbit. But rockets are not about escape
velocity because rockets have constant thrust. Rockets can lift off it basically zero points zero zero zero zero zero one meters per second and still make it to space because they're pushing themselves constantly. They're like climbing a ladder rather than just getting a single push. So escape velocity is not relevant for rockets. What is relevant for rockets is this specific impulse and how fast you want to go.
So in this case, the rocket would be not just getting us off Earth, but it would stay with us and it would continue to propel us through space.
Yeah, exactly. And the sort of bog standard rocket we have is a chemical rocket where the thing that you're throwing at the back is also the way you're getting energy. Basically, you have like exploding stones that you're throwing out the back. The stones throw themselves out the back, right, because the fuel is the propellant and the source of energy. You light it on fire and the explosion goes out the back. You get pushed the other direction, and so that's cool.
And you know, obviously fuel we can find here on Earth, but the specific impulse of these engines is not huge, right, So it's not a great way to get going really really fast unless you have incredible quantities of fuel. So this is the rocket equation at work here. So if you do a little calculation, like how much fuel does it take to get off of Earth and to the Moon an enormous quantity, right, filling a huge Saturn rocket.
How much fuel does it take to get to Alpha Centauri if you've got to burn that chemical engine the whole way, Well, that goes exponential, and the fuel tank is something like the size of Jupiter.
What there's a showstopper. Kelly's gonna keep track of these showstoppers as we go because she's the wet blanket.
But I'm gonna be optimistic because in the end I'm really hopeful that we do get to another star, and we do, or somebody, not me, but some human gets to go and set their eyes on an alien planet.
I think we will eventually.
All Right, you heard it there, folks said it.
I do, I do, but I'm not gonna put any money on a date, all right. So when I was writing a city on Mars, the engineers would get grumpy with me for occasionally using the words fuel and propellant interchangeably, which we didn't do in the final manuscript. Nobody needs to freak out and write me. Now, this was in an early draft. So, Daniel, what is the difference between fuel and propellant?
So, propellant is anything you want to throw out the back of your rockets, right, and fuel is a special combination which is both a source of energy and a propellant, but it doesn't have to be. Another example of a propellant that separates these things is a nuclear rocket. So rather than using fuel to explode and create energy and propellant simultaneously, use something like a nuclear reactor a fission reactor to produce the energy, which you then use to
throw some inert mass out the back. You heat up a gas, for example, and it bubbles out the back of your rocket.
Chip.
The fuel there is like uranium which is powering your nuclear reactor, which is providing the energy to toss the propellant out the back. The propellant and the fuel are very separate in this technology, and.
So with the nuclear rocket, what would the propellant be. Could it be like anything that you heat up.
Yeah, it could be anything you can heat up. But you've got to bring some mass to throw out the back, right, stones, white chocolate, xenon, whatever, you want. Something pretty inert so it's not reacting, but you also need to bring enough of it, and it's going to be dense enough that it's not going to be huge. And nuclear rockets are
cool because it's something we've actually built. We had an episode where you and I talked about new clear jet planes, and it's the same principle, right, A jet engine operates, and the same principle is very similar to a rocket. You have the fuel which explodes and pushes something out the jet airplane, this whole air compression thing. So jets don't work in space, but you could also have a
nuclear jet engine. We're using a nuclear reactor to heat the stuff up and shoot it out the back, same basic principle, and that applies to rockets in space as well. So in this case, you heat the stuff up and you shoot the gas at the back, and that could be a nuclear rocket.
But we haven't actually sent a nuclear rocket to space, right. The only kind of rocket we've ever sent to space is the chemical one.
That's right. We do have test nuclear engines which people have built and tested and shown to work, and they once did fly an airplane with a working nuclear reactor on board. Scary stuff, but it wasn't actually powering the plane anyway. This is like a viable technology, not just science fiction.
And so you said that for chemical rockets, the container that would store the fuel would need to be as big as Jupiter. How big are we working on now? If it's a new So.
It doesn't have to be nearly as big because the fuel is much more dense, right, Uranium incredibly dense compared to like diesel or even like oxygen or whatever you're using as fuel, and so that doesn't need to be nearly as big. But you'd still have to bring the propellant, right, You still need a lot of stuff to throw out the back. So we're not talking about the massa jubutter, but we're still talking a very very large ship with
a huge amount of propellant. Now, there's some folks that have ideas for like gathering propellant along the way that dust you talked about, or the interstellar medium that's stuff, right, you could use that as propellant. So there are technologies like ramjets or buzzard jets that people talk about where you have like a scoop that gathers propellant up and then your engine whatever you're using, a nuclear reactor or something else, for example, is throwing that out the back.
And so there are ways to avoid like having to have a cataclysmically large ship in that way. Though there are also a lot of people who think that those ramjets and bussard jets are totally impractical for other reasons. Same enough said.
What if the thing that you're throwing out the back of your rocket is nuclear bombs? Cause why not?
Right?
Why now? This is actually not a terrible idea in some ways because it separates the ship from the propulsion in a way that we'll talk about for solar sales. If you could blow up a series of nuclear weapons between here and Alpha Centauri, and you had a ship with like a huge shield in the back that could absorb all the radiation and the energy that was dumped out by the nuclear bombs. Then you could just sort of like ride this wave of nuclear explosions all the
way to Alpha Centauri. And you know, this is the basis of Project Orion. And then later Project Data lists the idea having like a series of small bombs providing like this smooth acceleration. Now you know, how do you get those bombs? How do you lay a trail of bombs from here to the next star. It was more about like near Earth navigation or getting things off planet than like actually going from star to star. But we can't not talk about blowing up nuclear bombs as a
way to propel a ship. It's just got to be in the conversation.
Project Datalus had a follow up project called Project Icarus because Icarus was Datalus's son. But Icris is the one who flew too close to the Sun and his wings melted and he fell down and died. And I always remember feeling like, isn't this supposed to be inspirational and like? But but I was told I just wasn't looking at it the right way. And again, this is why I don't get invited to the space parties.
Do you think it's hard to sign up test pilots for Project Icarus.
It could be, but again, I bet somebody would show would sign up. There's a lot of people who are much braver than I.
Am looking for volunteers for a project Crash and Burn. Anybody, anybody, nobody, Probably a lot. Anyway, that's a cool technology, and the cool thing there is if you could somehow manage it. It separates the ship from the source of energy, right, and also from the propellant, and so the ship itself doesn't have to be very big. Of course, that's sort of assuming a solution to the core problem, which is how to get all these nuclear bombs from here to Alpha Centauri, which is basically impossible.
What do you think the aliens would think as we were like leaving a trail of nuclear explosions on our way to their galaxy? Do you think they'd be like, Wow, they've really conquered technology. Or do you think they'd be like, oh my gosh, how do we get them to turn around?
Yeah?
I can't wait for them to show up, right. I think it's cool because we can imagine how we might detect aliens doing the same, Right, Like, if aliens have come up with this idea, and they're using it around their star. We might be able to detect it if they're close enough, So that's pretty cool. But yeah, I don't think it'd be a great way to announce our presence to the universe.
They would definitely have time to set up the welcome party or the go home party.
But along these lines, there's lots of permutations on this kind of propulsion once you separate the explosions from the propellant. So, for example, there are other ways to accelerate stuff, Like you could have an electric field and you have ions. An electric field will push ions, that's what it does, and so if you had like an electric field and a bunch of ionized propellant, you could shoot that out
the back. Basically, we're talking about a particle accelerator. That's exactly what a particle accelerator like the large hadron collider does. It pushes particles with electric fields and makes them go really really fast. So build a particle accelerator, point it out the back of your ship. That's going to give you some impulse.
This seems like another very large design, right How big would your particle accelerator need to be?
Well, not that big. Actually, and it's cool because it separates the two systems, and so your power source can be anything. It could be solar power, it could be some other crazy system that doesn't necessarily have to be super duper big. In this case, it's nice because it doesn't even have to generate a lot of heat, right, and so for those hand wringers aboard, you don't have to worry about it like melting down or something like that.
The downside to this is that the thrust is really tiny accelerating particles and particles don't have a lot of mass, and they sort of limit to how many particles you can effectively shoot out the back, and so it can provide very long term gentle thrust, which is nice for constant acceleration, but it can't really give you a lot of specific impulse, and so it's not a great way to like get up to a high speed in a short amount of time. But it's cool for like navigating around space a little bit.
So this could be like a generation ship thing. And so can you remember what the difference is between thrust and specific impulse.
They're basically the same thrust a specific impulse times the constant of gravity, but you can think of them as interchangeable. They're just different by units essentially.
All Right, we're going to take a break now, and when we come back, we're going to talk about using anti matter to get you to the stars. All right, So we just finished talking about ion drives as a way to get you to the stars, and I see that next we're going to talk about antimatter, and I am immediately thinking that dangerous explosions are maybe not what I want happening, you know, on the ship that I'm living on. But why is Kelly being a wimp?
No, Kelly is not being a wimp. We are steadily moving from reliable technologies we know can work and probably won't kill you, to crazy ideas that might not ever work and are much more likely to kill anybody on board.
O good, all right.
But antimatter is cool because it's the most efficient way to store energy. Like matter, and antimatter annihilation is perfect conversion of matter into energy. Compare that to for example, chemical fuel. Right, chemical fuel has a lot of energy in it, but when you burn it, you only release a little bit of that energy from the chemical bonds. But inside those protons and inside those electrons is an
enormous amount of stored energy, which we call mass. If you could capture all that will release all of that, you would need to bring less fuel, right, and so matter antimatter annihilation is the best way to do that. You have protons and anti protons. They turn directly into photons which you can shoot out the back of your ship. And that's awesome because the propellant there is moving at the speed of light, right, so like you can't be that for maximum thrust and impulse. So far this sounds
great now. The downsides are, of course, Kelly worries about being annihilated herself because antimatter is pretty dangerous stuff. Yeah, so you need some sort of magnetic confinement for antimatter, basically a bottle that doesn't touch it. You know, a bottle made of matter that builds a magnetic field that confines it, sort of the way we do for plasmas
in Tokomax infusion reactors. That's not totally implausible, But then again, you basically have a bomb on board and any loss of containment and everybody's dead, yeah before you can do anything. So that's bad. But on the flip side, antimatter is basically impossible to make in large enough quantities, so you're pretty much safe. You know, we make antimatter. We made
it for the previous collider. We used to have the Tevatron, which was a proton anti proton machine, and we produced antimatter at the Large Hadron Collider all the time in collisions, so it's not actually that exotic. It's made in the atmosphere, like cosmic rays hit the atmosphere turn into a antimatter briefly. But the quantities we're talking about are like nanograms of antimatter. You know, we can like count the atoms of antimatter
we make. There's no large scale production of antimatter in order to make enough fuel to get anybody near Alpha Centauri. I read one estimate that said making one hundred milligrams of antimatter would cost about one hundred trillion dollars.
Oh my gosh. All right, so I'm curious since we're starting to get towards the really crazy ones. Out of the technologies we've talked about so far, if you had to go to Alpha Centauri, which one of these would you want to use?
Probably none of these? Okay, my favorite is one we haven't talked about yet it's a little bit ridiculous and speculative, but it's still my favorite.
All right, let's keep going. Then, what's next next?
I want to talk about a nonsense idea which is out there people are probably imagining might save the day, and that's propulsion list drives. People have been thinking, okay, well, conservation of momentum requires we throw something out the back. We're tossing stones or white chocolate out the back of our spaceboat to get it moving. That's frustrating that it limits us, right because you've got to bring all this
stuff to throw out the back. Wouldn't it be amazing if we could generate a drive which didn't need that, Yeah, that would be amazing and also violate conservation of momentum. But that has to stop people from trying and go for it. Guys, like it wouldn't be the first time that we discovered and sit you something that revealed we didn't understand the universe. So I'm all in favor of people doing crazy experiments.
That's just like a Friday in physics, right where you discover you were wrong about something.
Yeah, those are the best moments in physics, So nobody should be limited by like conventional wisdom about what's possible or impossible, but we should also be clear eyed about what we have actually proven. And there are folks out there who claim to have built one of these things. It's called an em drive, and about fifteen years ago there was a lot of hoopla about it. There's a
lot of coverage and the New Scientist. But these folks who had some like tenuous NASA affiliation, who claim to have built the impossible space drive, And if you look for articles, you'll see them there in Popular Mechanics, they're and wired, they're in the New Scientist. But the journalists here really didn't do their work, Like if you look carefully at the claims, you see that the thrust that
these things produce is really really tiny. It's basically smaller than the uncertainties, you know, like they just have jitter in their measurements that have sources of noise and they measure a thrust, but the thrust is consistent with zero within errors. So while I'm all for crazy new technologies and exploding understanding the universe, the EM drive is not something that's done that. These are fascinating ideas, and there's
not nothing to support the concepts. One idea is that there's a vacuum in space, and that vacuum has energy to it, and experiments like the Casimir effects show us that the vacuum is real and it's there, and people wonder if we can extract energy from the vacuum and use it to propel ourselves. But you know, the vacuum is special. You can't like row against the vacuum. You can't like absorb momentum or get momentum. It's emotional the
way space is. For example, you can't like put an ore down and row through space in the same way. And this is part of space. So anyway, em drives not something we can rely on and not something I would bet on. But hey, if you're out there and you're building em drive, I hope you make it work.
Fingers crossed, all right? So I have heard proposals where you know, the Sun is shooting out photons all the time. What if you could capture those photons and let the Sun sort of push you forward? How would that work?
This is my favorite idea because it separates the ship from the propulsion completely, right. So this is called a solar sale, and the idea is that you're right. The sun is putting out photons, and not just photons but other particles. The solar wind has momentum, So why like generate momentum if we have an enormous momentum generating machine already, and so all you need to do to capture that momentum is build a huge sail. So you know, when you're on a sailboat, a sail is just a piece
of cloth that gathers that momentum. Here, the best kind of sale would be something very thin, so low mass and reflective. And imagine a photon hits the sail, it bounces off the same way a photon hits a mirror and bounces off. Right, what happens, Well, the photon is now changing its momentum. It's going one way. Now it's going the other way. Conservation momentum says that can't happen
unless something is going the opposite direction. Right, something is now going the way the photon originally was to conserve momentum, and that's the sail. This is a confusing concept for people because it's hard to imagine like light pushing something because light has no mass, and you're probably thinking, well, momentum is mass times velocity, and photons have no mass, so therefore they have no momentum. Right, Yeah, wrong, And the reason is that momentum is mass times velocity only
for very slow stuff. As you approach the speed of light, the equation changes a little bit. So photons do in fact have a momentum even though they have no mass. So yeah, their momentum can push along a sail. So imagine a tiny little ship with an enormous sail and the photons are bouncing off of it and giving it a push. Basically, you don't need an engine.
So one of the things that always sounded limiting to me with this method is that it seems like it would work great when you're close to the sun. But the farther you get from the Sun, the fewer photons are going to be hitting your sail. How would this work when you get too far away from the sun.
Yeah, this is tricky. As you say, you get further from the Sun, the photon density drops by one over are squared. That's bad. So this is a good idea for moving around the Solar system, like navigating from here to Mercury or here to Neptune. A very light without fuel would be awesome. Getting from here to another star would be hard. And what you need to do is build an enormous laser. Like think about a really big laser,
now make it ten times bigger. That's too small. You need an enormous laser, right, really huge laser, or like a big laser array that I'll focus their energy on this sale. But the cool thing is, again, you can build this on Earth, or you can have it in space or something. You don't need to bring it with you, and you can point it at your ship and push it to another star. So it's not a solar sale anymore. It's like a photonic sail.
And I can't imagine that a laser of that size is going to cause any geopolitical conflict at all. A weapon of that magnitude.
Yeah, we're building the Death Star basically for good reasons to go to space. We're just making space smores. What's the big deal, right, But there's a project to do this. It's called Breakthrough Star Shot and they want to take a bunch of nanocraft like tiny little devices, and they want to build ground based lasers and send those devices to Alpha Centauri. Now you push these tiny little devices long enough you can get them up to like twenty percent of the speed of light. And so you do
the math and these things. They're estimating to launch them in like twenty thirty ish twenty thirty five, they would take about twenty years. They'd be there about like twenty fifty five. So if I'm lucky, i'd be around when the signal comes back, you know, from Alpha Centauri. This is something that really could happen, which is why I think it's my favorite technology. The challenge, of course, is getting a big enough sale to push a ship with people on it. You know, so far we're just talking
about sending tiny nano robots. But you know, if I want to go there, you got to bring me and my toilet, my bed, you know, all sorts of stuff needs to go with me. So we're not talking nano ships anymore. So we're talking enormous sales, and we really need like better technology for enormous sales that are going to somehow survive the interstellar trip those micro meteorites tearing it apart. So you know, there's potential there, but there's a lot of engineering challenges to solve.
Yeah, this is a cool technology. Are the are the little nanoships that break through starshot is sending Are they going to have like cameras and scientific instruments on them or are they just able to say we're here and that's it TBD.
But I hope they're gonna put some cameras on there. I mean to be amazingly ridiculous to get something all the way there and take no data, right.
Yeah, that would be a major bummer. We haven't talked yet about a method to me that seems perhaps likely something that we have some experience with, which is gravity slingshots, which which we're used in Aurora Kim Stanley Robinson's book to slow down on the way back to Earth. Is that something that we could use to speed up to get there?
Absolutely, Gravitational slingshots are amazing. You know, you whiz near a planet basically steal a little bit of its speed. We should dig into the physics of that in a whole episode because there's some subtleties there about like why you end up with a little bit of speed, And the short version of it is that you slow down the planet's rotation around the star, which is really cool, and we've done this. You know, Voyager one, for example,
one of our only interstellar probes. It's swung around the Sun, but it's not going that fast. You know, it's traveling like a light year in about eighteen thousand years. So you can't get going to like interstellar speeds unless you're getting crazy close to the star, and that's got its own dangers. So gravitational slingshots are a good way to boost your speed and to get going, but on their own they're not going to provide the speed that you need to get to another star.
Got it all right, So let's wrap things up on the most sci fi methods. So what can we do to can we like bend space or time to make this happen?
Yeah, so far we're considering flat space. We're imagining you know, light is going to take a few years to get there. What can we do to approach the speed of light? But of course we know that space is not just flat. Space bends, it curves, and in the presence of mass, it can do all sorts of things. They can wiggle, not something we fully understand, but you know, we know that this kind of thing is possible, and so in the last few years or so, people have been thinking about, like,
could we actually build a warp drive. This would be something that bends space so that effectively the journey is shorter. And that's really what space curvature means, that you're changing the relative distance between two points. So hey, why not make Alpha centaur really really close so that doesn't take as long to get there. And that's the idea of a warp bubble that you like, shrink the space between you and the star and expand the space behind you.
And then when you get there, you pop out of this warp bubble and you're like, hey, that wasn't a big deal.
How likely is it that these warp bubbles actually exist or could be created?
That's a topic of hot debate. On the positive side, there's a guy who's figured out that warp bubbles do not violate general relativity, meaning like a warp bubble doesn't break any of those rules. That doesn't mean that a warp bubble could actually exist in the universe because you create something because it's allowed in the universe. Like everybody knows chocolatesou fleas are allowed in the universe, Does I
mean everybody knows how to make them? You have to have a very delicate process to get from no chocolate sooufle to chocolates sooufle, right, and there's lots of ways to fail. We don't have a recipe for building a warp drive, but just know that the resulting drive is not disallowed by general relativity. It could be that some step between no warp drive and warp drive is disallowed or is impossible. And so if you could just like magically pop a warp drive into existence, then physics is
cool with it. But we don't know if it's possible to create one in our universe.
All right, Well, I'm going to hope that it is, because that would make things really convenient. At the beginning of the show, you mentioned that in your favorite book they just moved stars closer together. How would that work? And why would everyone be dead?
This is basically like the think big version of the solar sale. Right. In this version, you build a huge sale like half the size of the sun. Yeah, that's right, half the size of the sun. Wow, wrap half of the sun a big mirror that points back at the Sun. Okay, And so you might think, well, what's gonna happen? That mirror is just gonna shoot off it's a big solar sale.
It gets pushed away by the Sun. Right, Well, you bring it close to enough and you make it massive enough that it's gravitationally captured by the Sun. So now basically the mirror and the Sun are like a single gravitational object. The Sun is shooting half of its photons to the mirror, but they get bounced back so basically recaptured. On the other side, the Sun is shooting off its photons out into space. So now it's like an ion drive. So one half of the Sun is basically captured and nullified,
the other half is not. Now the Sun can move right. The Sun is basically like a rocket, and so this could move the whole Solar system. And Kelly should feel great about this because you could travel to another star without even leaving your house. You could like literally sleep in your bed at home and we could go visit Alpha Centauri move the whole Solar system.
Okay, all right, so that sounds awesome. I love that you dream big. But like, so you know we've talked before, if like suns get too close to each other, one of them gets like thrown off into the vastness of space. This feels like a high risk method.
Well, it's hard to turn a star, you know, if you realize you're going in the wrong direction. This is harder to turn than like one of those U hauls that are already pretty hard to turn. Yeah, there's a lot of ways this could go wrong. You know, maybe a safer method is to use a black hole instead, because.
Black holes, You physicists, wouldn't it be safer if we used a black hole?
I like, you just laugh in my face at that one.
I'm sorry.
I mean a black hole also converts mass into energy. Right, black holes evaporate, they have energy stored inside them because of their mass, but they generate Hawking radiation, which is energy. So put a black hole next to a mirror and in the same way, it will generate propulsion in one direction, right if it's gravitationally captured the mirror, and so that's absorbing that radiation. Now you have a black hole which is turning its mass into radiation and pushing your ship
so you don't have to move a whole star. Now you have a black hole power and spaceship. And of course there's technical problems here, like how do you actually make the black hole? We don't know how to do that. Maybe you could find a black hole. We don't know where any of them are. Also, there are some risks involved in having a black hole on board your ship. Please sign these waivers, all.
Right, So I'm going to ask myself the question, which one of those methods do I think I would use if I was forced to go on a ship to Alpha Centauri. I think that I would agree with you about the solar sale technique. But what would make me nervous is that somebody else is in control of the propulsion and so like, I imagine that keeping a giant laser constantly powered has got to take a lot of energy.
And so what if one day, you know, the Americans are like, you know what, We're not powering this laser anymore. It's just too expensive. And then what do you do?
Yeah, well there's not much you can do.
You know.
The other issue with a solar sale is slowing down. Like it gets you up to near the speed of light using that big laser, then you have to use the destination sun to slow down, but it is no laser there to give you that boost, and so you got to like combine that with gravitational sling shots. It's tricky. Yeah, there's no way I'm getting on any of these ships ever, But I encourage all of you to, like, please go explore the universe and tell us all about it.
Send me a postcard.
All right. So, I think we surveyed some of the technologies that might get us to other stars, and my take is that there's some promise here. Obviously there are kinks to be worked out, and Kelly and her legal team need to be put at ease about the black hole on board, you know, or moving the entire sun. Do we need to take a vote before we do that. I'm not sure, But to me, these feel like solvable problems.
And you know, we're young as a species technologically. In one hundred years and a thousand years will good this out, and maybe even by then somebody will have built an em drive.
Well, And to surprise everybody, I am actually optimistic about some of this stuff, and I feel like these are really interesting problems that we have to solve, and imagine the other things that we're gonna learn along the way, where the new technologies will come up with as we try to make some of these methods work. I think it's all very.
Exciting, all right, But before you get too excited, next episode, we're gonna talk about all the other tricky problems you would have to solve to get humans to another solar system, giving birth on board? Is it okay to have children born between planets? Embryos, robots, cryogenics, radiation, all that good stuff. So tune in next time for Kelly to throw a wet blanket on your interstellar dreams.
That's what I do, so well out, all right.
Tune in next time everyone.
Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe is produced by iHeartRadio. We would love to hear from you, We really would.
We want to know what questions do you have about this Extraordinary Universe.
We want to know your thoughts on recent shows, suggestions for future shows. If you contact us, we will get back to you.
We really mean it. We answer every message. Email us at Questions at Danielankelly dot.
Org, or you can find us on social media. We have accounts on x, Instagram, Blue Sky and on all of those platforms. You can find us at D and K Universe.
Don't be shy write to us