This is Dan Caplis and welcome to today's online podcast edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind, and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every single day on your favorite podcast platform. As predicted, in fact, the day before the conviction. The conviction of Donald Trump is going to do him more good on election day than had he been acquitted. And I think we're seeing the proof of that in multiple ways right now. You know, is
it a straight line. Nothing in life is right here, always that if you're winning the two or three steps forward, one step back. But overall, clearly at this point what I expected to happen is happening. And this is going to be very very good for Donald Trump come election day. So we'll have some of the latest including contributions. According to the Trump campaign,
the post conviction contributions are now up to two hundred million. Now. Critically, campaign says seventy seven zero million of that is quote small donations, and they give the example of twenty dollars forty dollars, and obviously, you know you want as much of this two hundred million to be small donations. As possible, right, because then that means more people are enthusiastic, they're intense, they're on fire, They're going to go out and do other things as
well. So yeah, seventy million in small donations since the wrongful conviction. Yeah, that is very very encouraging. Two hundred million overall not bad itself, right, considering Joe Biden, this vaunted fundraising machine raised I think it was somewhere around fifty million in April and just since the wrongful conviction. You
can see the Trump numbers. I also read something significant into the large donor convictions since large donor contributions that show conviction and show commitment to Trump since the wrongful conviction, because you know obviously that big money comes in chunks and you need your fair share of that to be able to compete on the money front. Not that the money front is everything, right, I mean, how
many people did you see at lunch today drinking new coke? Right? And they spent a lot of money marketing new coke and and the Jeb Bush presidency. I know a lot of people really enjoyed it. Yeah. Wait, there wasn't one. And Jeb Bush at one time was dwarfing the field in contribution. So yeah, money isn't everything, but particularly in this situation, I think it's a powerful indicator of the underlying outrage and the big move toward
Trump since then. So we'll talk more about that today in other ways as well. Eight five five for zero five eight two five to five the number? Will this? What will this wrongful conviction of Trump be enough to unify the Colorado GOP in a way that allows it to win statewide? Would love your take on that also, as you know, throwback and I love callers. Eight five five for zero five eight two five five the number, or
you can text d an five seven seven three nine. We have so much more on the agenda today, Lots going on locally as well, though I see this, all of this flowing out of the wrongful conviction of Trump has a profound impact locally as well as nationally, and will continue to break that down. But we have other topics. The start of the Hunter Biden trial today. A question out there for you, do you think Joe Biden wants
to see Hunter Biden convicted? Think about that for a second and I'll get back to that, But do you think he wants to see Hunter convicted. Is it to Joe Biden's political advantage to have Hunter Biden convicted particularly right now today? So on June three, And of course the conviction won't come down today, that'll be later. They just had jury selection today. I think
they got their jury. I'll double check that, but Jerry selection today, I do At some point I want to talk with you about Kit Clark. We're not a sports show. Obviously, we talk about sports on air. We talk about sports in the break all the time. We talk about sports on air when it transcends sports, and certainly what's happening to Caitlyn Clark in women's professional basketball right now does that? So we'll want to get to that. Is it racism? Is it gender preference? I mean, what is
behind the mauling of Caitlin Clark right now on the court? Or is it something else? And as you may gather from the way I pose the question, I'm in that third something else category. But do want to get into that with you. Just a quick note, congrats to Mark Johnson, the
baseball coach at Cherry Creek for fifty something years. Right now, what an accomplishment went out with the state title and over a great Regis team coached by Matt darr Is, also a great coach and just one of those feel good cool This is the best of what high school sports is all about kind of stories. So congrats to Mark everybody associated with the program and that accomplishment.
All right, let's get to it. I want you to hear this back and forth between Meghan Kelly, who's really i'd say emerging, but you know, she's been good for a long time. But Meghan Kelly now is certainly moving to the front of the pack in terms of skilled combatants on behalf of Donald Trump. Not always, but very often. And here she is toe
to toe with Dan Abrams. And this isn't the precise question here, but I do want to ask you the related question, because Meghan Kelly and others have been advocating this, do you believe that it's time for GOP attorney Attorneys General, GOP elected prosecutors, etc. To start prosecuting and convicting democrats, you know, for crimes they have committed. Now, obviously I don't believe Donald Trump committed a crime here. I believe everything I've told you about that
trial in New York. But in situations where Democrats are actually guilty of crimes? Is a time for the GOP to start arresting them? Well, you want to get the indictment for first, the indictment, the arrest, conviction, et cetera. Or would that be the wrong thing to do and a tragic mistake politically. So I want to get your take on that as well. So here's Dan Abrams and Megan Kelly. There's wrongdoing here? Right, There was definitely wrongdoing whether it should have been a crime. As a separate
what's the wrongdoing? What's the wrongdoing? All? Right? Number one, it's paying one hundred and thirty thousand dollars to a porn star to keep her quiet. That's worth to try to protect your campaign? Can we at least agree that's wrong? It's not illegal? No, No, I just said wrong. Are we talking moral? I made it clear, I'm making it clear for a minute, I'm talking about morality versus legalon right, there's no doubt that he engaged in right, I'll tell here's my response to that.
And I said this on my show the other day. I don't know what kind of weird marriage these two have, same as I didn't know what kind of weird marriage Billet and Hillary Clinton had, so I don't know what their covenant is in terms of what he's allowed to do on the outside of his marriage. Don't mind the sex problem, but I'm not talking about the sex. I'm talking about one hundred and thirty thousand dollars to keep her quiet to
protect his campaign. There's nothing wrong with that at all, nothing really okay. Look, if somebody runs for office, they just lose the right to have any privacy. They just to let us see all their dirty laundry from the moment they declare forward or somehow they've done something morally wrong or legally wrong. When you're doing it to protect the campaign and you are spending money on it, then now I'm going to switch back to the legal You are now
crossing the line into legal products, right, aren't. That's no, absolutely not right, incorrect at every level. Again, the idea that that let me, Let me back up. And you don't think he falsified business records either. I don't know what he did. I don't think he wrote that every detail of this. How can you not know? Let me answer, Please, let me answer. I don't think he wrote down hush money payment to Stormy Daniels. Nobody who pays hush money would write down such a thing.
I think he wrote down or someone at the Trump organization wrote down legal expenses from the drop down Adobe menu, And that made as much sense as anything else, because hush money wasn't an option. He was paying his lawyer who had made the payment to Stormy Daniels, and he was I believe, reimbursing her, though he denied that, reimbursing him, though he denied that. Understand, I don't think there's anything wrong with doing that. I think
you pay your lawyer money because he outlaid money for you. You could easily classify that as a legal expense no matter what it's for. Right, even if it's illegal conduct, you can just put it. It's a legal expense. Right. This wasn't This wasn't illegal. There's nothing illegal about paying hush money for an NDA. And we'll get back to the rest of that which has gone viral. But here's what the left can never get away from.
Clearly, this charge against these charges against Trump were brought for political purposes. They would not have been brought unless Donald Trump was Donald Trump. So it wasn't a matter of what he'd done. It was a matter of who he was that there is no question about that whatsoever. There's no question that there was no actual independent felony committed. First of all, he didn't commit any crimes. But initially it was a misdemeanor. Statute of Limitations had run on
that on the issue of accounting. And second they tried to make it a felony by saying it was a federal election offense. That was a misdemeanor as well. So they had to, in this highly politically motivated approach, combine one set of misdemeanors the Statute of Limitations had run on with another set of misdemeanors to try to claim a felony. And there were so many more problems
with that. But the reason I make that point and played that tape is this, Democrats, and I'll play the tape for you when we come back our relying on convicted felon Donald Trump. Guess what that label means nothing to the Americans who are going to decide this election because they know this alleged felony is a first. So everybody you decide to call Donald Trump convicted felon is
only hurting their own credibility. Hey, we will also have at four thirty six Aaron Lee with us to talk about this volunteer effort underway to put parental notification and no boys in girls' sports on the Colorado ballot. That at four thirty six you're on the Dan Capla Show and now back to the Dan Taplas
Show podcast. Not on this case. It doesn't because this is a case just like your legal panel just debated, where smart lawyers, lawyers without a political affiliation are saying that this case is flawed in many regards and an appeal is at least at least a doable appeal to say the January sixth case, it could. Yeah, but I also but listen, I think that this case is unique. I think that when you have a case where the statute of limitations has run and the only way you can revi I have the cases
by cooking a federal crime, that's where the appeal is. That's the appeal. And that started out with Ryan's previous former head of the GOP saying Donald Trump convicted felon that label doesn't worry him in this case because of the nature of the the wrongful conviction behind it. Eight five five for zero five eight two five five the number textda N five seven seven thirty nine. Lots on
the agenda today, including lots locally here in Colorado. Four to thirty six, Aaron Lee joins us talk about this grassroots effort to put on the ballot these measures to for example, keep boys out of girls' sports, men's out of women's sports, parental notification of gender change quote unquote related issues, et cetera. So Aaron Lee on that at four thirty six, I want to
get to some more of this hot take sound of the day. President Trump out there, and obviously I think the more often he's out there right now, the better. Had a great appearance at UFC over the weekend, and this was New Jersey, a tremendous reception, as you would imagine. Sean Strickland of fighters shouted him out at the end of one of the bouts. The Trump, you're the man, wrote to the damn travesty what they're doing now, I'll be donating you, my man. Let's get it done.
Get it done. Second, lady gentlemen. Yeah, And that's so important, right because I mean, you look at the demo of the folks behind UFC, and it does not match up with kind of the typical demo of a Trump rally, you know, so much younger, so much more diverse, et cetera. So just more evidence of everything we've been talking about,
everything positive when it comes to Trump and post conviction. Speaking on the money front, and this is a point I made last week and affairs repeating because this time it was made by one of the billionaires who have lined up behind Trump since since the wrongful conviction. And this is a guy named David Sachs out of Silicon Valley and who isn't right, but he's pledging a lot of money, getting a bunch of other rich guys together to give a lot of
money. I think the minimum buy in for his deal, if I read it right, is about three hundred grand. But anyway, here's what he said, And again this is a point I've been hammering. He said, post conviction, there is now only one issue in this election, whether the American people will stand for the USA becoming a banana republic. And that is such a key point because think about it. I mean, first of all, that the folks who are going to bag Trump, are thinking about backing
Trump, are now fired up off the scales. But beyond that, the folks who didn't want to vote for Trump are now going to vote for him. But they're going to vote for him because it's the only way to stop the Left. They're not voting these additional folks aren't voting for Trump because they like him, or they out voting for Trump because they want to advance Trump. This whole other block of people now going to be voting for Trump because it's the only way to stop the Left. It's the only way to stop
America from becoming a banana republic. That that is, that is the secret sauce. Now that is such a huge dynamic in this race moving forward, which leads me to my question for you. Let's see if anybody answered it on text, and that is, do you think Joe Biden wants Hunter Biden convicted? Because, as you know, Hunter Biden goes on trial this week that picked a jury today on the gun charge. And this is the charge that he, you know, falsified documents relating to a gun purchase, that
he wasn't an addict when he knew he was. And then there are other related charges and he's obviously, my constitutionally protected opinion and that of many, many others. He's obviously guilty at all on all of these charges, and the Feds we're going to give him a break on these until a courageous judge stepped in and said, no, wait a second, We've got to ask some questions here, and Hunter Biden withdraw the police. So now he's on
trial. Do you think his father wants him convicted? Ponder that for a second related question. Does Joe Biden benefit more from Hunter Biden being convicted or not being convicted in this trial where he's just dead and nuts guilty by all accounts, Ask yourself that question. I think clearly. I think clearly Joe Biden benefits politically by having Hunter Biden convicted because at that point he could say, oh, no, equal justice under the law for all Trump's really guilty.
See, my son was convicted as well. But I love my son. He's the smartest guy I've ever known. I'm totally devoted to him as a parent. Because that's how the Dems are trying to spin it now, right, is Joe Biden great parents standing by his child, etc. That's how they're trying to spin this whole Tobacco well, keep this in mind. If you were to say to yourself, oh, there's no way Joe Biden or any father could ever want to have their child convicted, I would say
any father was a normal relationship with his child, you bad. But also keep this in mind that Joe Biden was using Hunter Biden as a bagman to collect money from some of the worst actors in the world. You know, during these times when Hunter Biden was struggling with addiction. And even if he hadn't been struggling with addiction, what father does that to a son. Yeah, So think about that when it comes to who Joe Biden really is and what he really wants here. So yeah, I think he benefits a lot
politically from Hunter Biden being convicted here. I think it hurts them politically if Hunter Biden is acquitted in a case where Hunter Biden is clearly guilty and obviously these charges this trial doesn't involve an awful lot of the more pertinent allegations against Hunter Biden. I mean, these are serious charges, serious issues. But Hunter Biden has been involved, along with Joe Biden, you know, in an awful lot of very very shady stuff, and these charges don't involve any
of that. In fact, as any McCarthy reported so well, the US attorney involved allowed the statute of limitations to run on certain charges that would have gone right to the heart of that period of time when Joe Biden was in office and Hunter Biden was out collecting money. Doug and Frederick, you're on the Dan Kaplis Show. Welcome, Hi, Dan. I appreciate you. I was thinking who could I turn to. I was looking forward to calling
you to break down exactly what it is Trump is guilty of. What the federal charges they hooked to this to move it from a misdemeanor, and of course the precedent in this is just unbelievable. What this will do to our country or could do to our country has done to our country. The other thing I wanted to say, Dan was a did you see with a CNN top analyst Legal analyst? Yeah, Ellie honid Is he's saying this is all
bogus. Yeah, Ann right, And he's really emerging. And I've been in this on air local network legal analysis since it really started to hit back in the nineties, and he is emerging as one of the greats because and I don't agree with everything he says, but because of his willingness to break with that leftist gript So we'll touch on all of that on the other side on the Dan Kaplas Show. You're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast,
Doctor Fauci. One of the controversial regulations of the pandemic was the six foot distancing role. This role became an important policy consideration in subsequent regulations. However, you testified recently, and I'm quoting, this six foot role sort of just appeared. Do you think that a role that sort of just appeared is substantial justification for the regulations that we saw based on that six foot role? Congressman, thank you for that question. I am so that, but I'll
summarize it briefly for you. When saying it just appeared, it came from the CDC. Oh my lord. You know, I think of all these people who for their own political, personal, selfish motivations, inflicted all this harm, particularly on the children. And I hope voters remember that. I hope they remember it forever. I hope they remember it about Jared Polus and others in Colorado. I hope they remember it about Joe Biden and the Democrats,
and because come on, and this leads into my next guest. When we talk about when we talk about policy differences and things like that, Listen, there should be one thing that's sacred right, and that's the best interests of the child. But over and over and over again we see from the left this utter and at times total disregard for the benefit of children. And you just wonder how people ever get to that point, you know, where
they're willing to just trample on children. They're willing to support the mass killing children before birth, all sorts of other horrible things for children because they think it advances them politically. Well, one person who's fighting back against that is our next guest, Aaron Lee. She's joining with the Senator Kevin Lumberg to try to put on the Colorado ballots some measures that would give parents some more information and restore some sanity. Aaron, Welcome to the Dan Kapla Show.
Hey Dan, thanks for having me. Well my pleasure. And obviously we've talked before, and we've talked at links about your experience with your child at a school, and I do want to touch on that again today and blend it any way you'd like to but tell folks about this ballot measure, what
it is and how they can support it if they'd like. Yeah, well, I'm really proud to be part of Protect Kids Colorado and we're a pretty new organization, and we're a broad coalition of parents, concerned grandparents that citizens who are not okay with the direction of gender ideology in our states, specifically parents being kept in the dark about their child's social transition at school, which is what happened to us, and I'm happy to dig into the details of
our situation. But then also keeping biological males out of single sex female sports, and both of these are just really easy, common sense, simple initiatives that both sides are getting behind. That your parents shouldn't be lied to, and that we fought really hard for women's single sex competitive spaces and those should be preserved for just biological females. Before we get more in detail, how can people help here, How can they sign how can they pass petitions around?
What are the mechanics of this? Yeah, so go to Protect Kids Colorado dot org. We encourage people to sign up to carry a petition or even just find a place to sign one. We're on kind of a tight deadline. We need one hundred and twenty five thousand signatures by August fifth is our death line, and so we've already got thousands of petitions in hand. We've got distribution points set up around the state. But in Colorado, they have legislated this process to death, and I think a lot of people don't
even know about the Citizens Ballid Initiative process. We're one of twenty five states who have this opportunity for citizens to make law, and in Colorado, our legislatures so off the rails. We can't even play defense on these anti parents, pro erasing women laws that are being passed, and so we're taking matters into our own hands. And this is truly a grassroots effort. We're all volunteers here who've jumped on because we care about these issues and we've got to
hold the line for sanity in the state of Colorado. And this is a really easy way for people to get involved. So it's a Protect Kids Colorado dot org and we hope that people will sign up just to get eighty signatures. Each petition has eighty lines and it's really easy. Take it to church, take it to a sporting event, and take it to your family reunion. It's really easy to get aby signatures and this is a way that everyone
can get involved in improving our fates. Yeah, and the Democratic Party picnic. I'd be really interested to see how many signatures you'd get there, because I bet it would be more than expected. Aaron Lee, our guest, Aaron, give us more detail on the printal notification piece of this. Yeah.
So back in November, we filed our first initiative, and we filed twenty initiatives to the title Board, which is comprised of the Attorney General and the Secretary of State Representation, and they completely illegally, unconstitutionally barred us from getting majority of them through, even saying the word parent was too broad to
be a single subject. So we started with a comprehensive parental bill of rights, your parents' right to view all curriculum, to consent to mental and medical health care, and to be notified if their child's been transitioned to the opposite sex. And this is the one that we got through. We had to break them down sent in by sentence, and the three that we got through out of the twenty, we were then challenged by one Colorado and Jared Polis's
lawyer and to the Colorado Supreme Court. Unfortunately we won those challenges. So the perical notification is one sentence. It's very simple. It just says, if someone in a public school, someone who works at the public school becomes aware that a child has transitioned to the opposite sex or is experiencing gender incongruence, meaning identifying as the sex they were not born with, then you have forty eight hours to notify the parent. And you know, we get this
pushback, your anti LGBTQ, anti this. No, we're just pro transparency. No, parents would still have a right to transition their own child, but you can't transition my child and lie to me about it. Well, and you're pro child by being proparent, and you're propared by being pro child, So what are they afraid of? So so glad you're doing this. Aaron Lee. Now, in the two minutes we have, can you summarize
for folks your own experience in the circumstance. Yeah, my twelve year old daughter you mentioned COVID at the height of COVID, was recruited by a teacher under false pretenses into a gender and sexuality awareness club disguised as an art club, and she brought an outside activist that told my daughter, if you're not fully comfortable in your biological sex, that means you're transgender. Oh, you
don't know who you're sexually attracted to, that means you're queer. They talked about polyamory, how to get puberty blockers, how to see a doctor and not tell us at twelve years old in the state of Colorado, and they continually emphasized, don't tell your parents. Don't tell your parents. They might not be safe. And so we're lucky she broke that rule and told us what happened. But she was captured. You know, they had planted feeds
in the public school and then they captured her in this meeting. Of course, she was uncomfortable as a twelve year old girl who just started putty and really fell into that identity. And it took nine months and suicidal ideation, and we went through a really dark time with her because the transgender label didn't fit. We didn't know how to help her, and therapists and the state are obligated to make it worse by affirming. And so we're lucky we got
her out of it. And that's why we went public and why we're fighting for the hundreds and hundreds of families who have now reached out to me with very similar issues, people from all side of the political spectrum, people with faith and without faith, whose child was transitioned at school to the opposite sex and they were left in the dark. And so it is a prevalent issue. People don't hear about it very often because people like me are usually afraid
to go public. They're just trying to save their child from this ideology. So we represent those many, many families who have been deceived by the public school and been left out of such an important situation. You know, their child's going through mental distress and they need their parents more than ever, and it's dangerous to cut the parents' only so impressed with the way you're standing up protect kids Colorado dot org. Eric, Let's make this a regular thing.
Wyannt you back on the show? Wannt you updating on the campaign, recruiting more people to help you and hopefully will get on the ballot. I would love that, Dan, thank you, Erin appreciate the time you take care. I'm telling you that's the best of America. Right when people rise up, they have this personal experience and they say, wait a second, I don't want this happening to any other kid, any other family. And they rise up and they put the work in. They're willing to put themselves out
on that limb. So yeah for tech kids, Colorado dot org check it out. What do you think of those two ballot measures? Do you think Joe Biden really wants Hunter Biden convicted? Here and the latest evidence, and there's plenty of it that Donald Trump is gaining tremendously politically from the wrongful conviction. You're on the Dankplace Show and now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast. There are a number of reasons to believe that the Trump appeal in the
Alvin Bragg case will be successful. You still think that, I do look very few of us outside Manhattan and have a lot of faith in the New York legal him right now and the former president may have some rough sledding on the first level of appeal, but after that, I think that some of these glaring errors will become more pronounced for judges. I think eventually it will go in front of the Supreme Court. In my view, it's it would be impossible to sustain this verdict. I mean this, There are so many
problems, so many errors that were committed by Judge Marshawn. But we may have to wait a bit. Is likely to occur after the election, which is what many people in Manhattan were hoping for. Yeah, and he makes such a critical point that I've hammered on before. Wait a second, Truly, who outside of Lower Manhattan would have any confidence in Elvin Bragg and any confidence in that process we just saw unfold. Now, obviously the people who
already Trump are already leaning against already you know, opposing Trump. You know they love it, right, But truly, what objective reasonable person in the middle, whether they have twenty years of education or one day of education, what reason would they have to have any confidence in that New York State justice system what they just saw unfold? And this occurred to me over the weekend because I use this term often on air. Everybody does, and everybody always
has this term justice system. But then it occurred to me over the weekend. I shouldn't do that, because it's just like for decades on air, I've told people, listen, when somebody tells you the jury this and the jury that. I put that aside, because that there is no quote jury, there is a collection of individual jurors. And that's how you have to think about these cases. When you're thinking about evidence argument, who's going to win, who's going to lose? If there's no one jury, there's a
collection of individual jurors. Same thing's true when comes to quote justice system. There is no one justice system. You have all of these individual justice systems, first on a state level, and then within each state you have these separate, distinct, separately functioning individual justice systems from county to county. And I think you can make some fair statements overall. I know Colorado best,
but I certainly know some others. You can make some fair statements overall about Colorado, And it's a justice system here I think very very highly of having worked in it for forty years. Perfect, no, but no human endeavor is. And then you go to certain other states and just because Colorado overall I think has a not perfect but a very good justice system, does that mean that they do in other states as well? So, yeah, there
is no one justice system. And the point being, even on the federal level, I mean, then yes, you have your DOJ and everything else but you still have individual states, individual US attorneys often functioning. Well, come on, it's you know, the president is the president, and the president, you know, has that kind of power and authority over DJ.
But you still have these individual US attorneys. And then you look at Colorado, where, overall my forty year experience hopefully another forty to come as Colorado
overall has a very good justice system. Then you look inside Colorado and you look at individual district attorneys particularly, you know, this very very tragic development now of having some of these far left district attorneys who, in my constitutionally protected opinion quite obviously are not viewing it as the kind of sacred trust that so many das from both sides have in the past, but are highly politicizing their decisions. Yeah, if you're a left to you get a pass on
virtually anything. And then if you're righting, hey man, you better not spit on sidewalker. They'll never see again. Right. So, Yeah, there is no one justice system. That's another reason why, as I predicted the day before the conviction, the actual conviction is going to be better for Trump politically than an acquittal, because no sane person in their right mind gives any credibility to that process. They just saw and fold in New York.
And by the way, where is the national affinity for New York City? I mean, hey, I'm admire and respect the great history and some of the great people and accomplishments. But new York City itself. You think the rest of America sits around and says, oh, yeah, new York City says he's guilty, he must really be guilty. No, it's probably much more of the opposite. All right, we'll go back to Doug in Frederick. Doug was kind enough to be with us earlier. Doug, And so
how would you summarize the big pressing questions that you have. Well, the overarching quote, well, fact is this is I was thinking about it that Left has done exactly what's never been done in this country. This president has never been said purposely because I think well, well thoughtful people on both sides of the aisle throughout the course of our history realized that this is this is politicizing our our justice system to take out a political opponentide it's a complete breakdown
of what America is supposed to be. And I want to tie that in. I'll make your last point too, that you just made about the Democrats. They waited to waited as long so they can't appeal won't go through until after the election. If you would, Dan, I really want to get your opinion on the Statute of limitations and how they got around that, and secondly, how did they move it from a misdemeanor to a supposed felony with the with the federal link to it. I don't understand that, and I
guess that's there's other things. Of course, the great lawyer from a from CNN, I think he needs to be a given credit for his chance. But I wanted to get your take, So you're taking my fall again, Dad. Thank you. Doug really really do appreciate that, and and I think in the end it really is very simple. You had these misdemeanor bookkeeping charges, false entry and business records, the Statute of Limitations had run on
those in twenty nineteen. And then you had those misdemeanors that the Statute of Limitations had run on. You had those combined with a claim that Trump had violated misdemeanors pertaining to election finance. And then you had a charge that was based on well, you know, if he or the allegation was that he did make these false entries in business records in order to cover up, you know, these alleged election finance violations than all of the submits of felony.
So that's how they cobbled all of this together. And the reason I get into that detail is I think it's one of the many, many reasons he's going to win on appeal, and I've never been more certain of anything. Eventually, Trump will win on appeal. The only question is what level, But as the left calculated, it'll be after election day. But again, Trump's benefiting from all this in the court of public opinion.