#871- Can A New Science Emerge By Combining Conventional, Quantum & Classic Science? With/ Luke

Oh that's are Hello, and welcome to the show.

This is the Cult of Conspiracy, and my name is Jonathan, I'm Jacob.

And today we bring back your boy Lou.

What a do?

My good sir?

What's up, guys? How y'all doing?

Stoked? Stoked about this conversation?

You have been diving into some weird scientific rabbit holes in which you feel like you're uncovering a lot. And that's what's so magical about all this is that I think that you know, science and all that kind of stuff is very fluid and if you if you remember back during the COVID days, it was always trust the science, Trust the science. Well it's not exactly trusting the science. It's trusting the scientists. That's really what they wanted you

Sir? Right right? I agree with that absolutely. So from the last last episode that we had went through an adventure of the universe all of that. At the end of it, I said I was going to take a break. As it turns out, I did not actually take a break whatsoever, and I went in deep started. I basically had a interesting realization which ended up making me go

All right, so break it down a little deeper for the uneducated into this conversation, what do you mean by unifying field? Do you mean everything being frequency and energy and so everything is unified in that regard or do you mean something else?

Separation is a fucking illusion, bro, Is that what you're trying to stay with this unified field theory?

Not necessarily so, when, for example, when Einstein made relativity, that wasn't just a theory that came out to explain gravity. It was majorly like to explain everything, to explain how everything got its shape, how everything got into the order that it was, how everything basically works. Quantum is basically another theory about that of just trying to explain how

I mean you would go for volts or amps versus you know, PSI's or atmospheres or something like that. I mean, I'm with you. The the terminology would change, but there is still a unit of measure associated with both I'm with.

You, right, So it's basically trying to figure out what that process is behind like behind closed doors, to make those happen and for them to actually work in the way that they do. Obviously, yes, you would not want voltage, for example, in like a water pump because that probably sucks, right right, Absolutely, So I realize after I this is actually something that I came up with earlier this week because I was trying to figure out what is the best like linear path to go on to basically tell

Okay, let's go.

I'm ready to break science's.

Heart, sir.

It's more than just science's heart. So when I went into this again trying to not have a biased opinion on it. I would say that that benefited me a lot, because there are some places to where it seems like biased opinions might have gone in, whether they were meant to or not. But because I wasn't looking at it that way, I didn't really frame it that way, so I never really fault anyone for it. I guess you could say, when.

You say biases, do you mean personal biases or educational biases?

They both could be the same.

Okay, fair Like how a lot of science and historical finds seem to somewhat contradict the findings that are in the Smithsonian Museum, for example.

Right right, it could I guess maybe there are definitely some bias opinions. You could also say assumptions, right, So if you do something, you get data, there's an assumption behind what caused that data, what process is actually played out in order to give you what you got? Right, So for example, and this is just in case any I guess physicists come through here and read this because this is the first time that this is going to be coming out, or not read it, but listen to the show.

First of all, I mean physicists are listening to this show please, dm us, I have so many Q questions about what you think about things, But yes, continue please.

I would say because of going into this with an unbiased opinion a lot of if I'm going to say all of them, all physicists that are out there, especially the legendary ones right like Einstein, like Hawkings, like Newton, I think the conspiracy community needs to realize that a biased opinion and an assumption could be different. So I would say, a biased opinion is you throwing out an unneeded assumption. But an assumption just as a whole, is you giving your idea for the data that you received.

Yeah. Now I could also see the gray area where there's meat, you know, in the middle. But I can see that, see, Yeah, I can see the nuances to where those could be separate conversations, and I can also see the nuances where there's would be the same conversation for sure.

Right, So, once this paper is released, I at no point in time am I actually saying that modern day physicists, scientists, whatever you want to say are wrong about the data that they are receiving, all of the math maths, all the numbers align correctly, and then on the other side.

You get go ahead. I had a question about the quantum, but I don't want to derail your point.

I realize, after completing my journey and looking over everything, I may have discovered what you could call the most tragic heartbreak in scientific history. By looking back at scientific lineage, I realized that all paths, no matter how divided, it, lead back to one individual. Also that while both relativity and quantum try to unify the other, this only spreads them farther apart, because neither realize that they are already

I guess my question is why do you believe that the quantum scientists would be the most offended for lack of better words.

I'm not going to say offended. So their work relies on probability, right, it relies on for the most part, Yes, it relies on When we're talking about quantum foam and we're talking about virtual particles, there is a large aspect of probability there, which.

But also the quantum conversation fifteen years ago was seen as hokum, that was seen as pseudoscience. There are those that believe that the quantum physicists are more of the open minded when it comes to possibilities of things that may not fit neatly into our paperwork as of this moment, because their whole thesis didn't fit neatly fifteen years ago. So whenever you say that whatever you're presenting is about to like derail them and they might be the most

But why do you think that they only started really getting it fifteen years ago? What happened fifteen years ago.

That I would say technology caught up to their theories?

Right? The theories have been around for forever, right, But like having a quantum computer or understanding the double slit experiment on a mathematical scale, it's kind of like Schrodinger's cat. Schrodinger's cat is a philosophical conversation that has been had for decades and decades and decades. It doesn't make it true or untrue. It's kind of a hypothetical thought process.

Not so minded, right, So, because there there is another side of that to where honestly, relativity might like the relativistic community might fight it more than the quantum and that is because the mystery behind Quantum ended up bringing a lot of younger people in that are more open

The Quantum has its own cult following. I can't tell you how much of the no offense to anybody who considers themselves a part of this community, but the Woo Woo community has latched onto Quantum to such a level, and most of them are speaking about things that they have no idea what they're saying, but it kind of aligns close enough to what they believe. It's developed its own cult following strictly off of it being so new and so mind bending.

I wouldn't even necessarily say the Wuo Woo. I would say just about every spiritual community has latched onto it, and every sense I mean I would.

I would say that every spiritual community has grabbed onto it at least one part of quantum right at least.

Well, and it also depends on what you consider woo woo. You know what I'm saying, it's all spirituals woo.

Now, like I said, I wasn't throwing shade. I'm not throwing shade towards the community or right.

But a lot of there's new age, and which we're not going to get totally into that, but a lot of these practices have been practiced for a very long time. It's not necessarily new. It's just people that are combining things together that never used to be combined before, in a sense, kind of like if you've ever looked into eclectic witchcraft.

That's all it is.

Is really just everybody putting a little bit here, a little bit there and combining it in a sense. And that's really what it. That's really where the title of new age comes from. All it's all old stuff. It's just the new age part of it is the combination of the old stuff that was never really combined before.

I'm not gonna lie. For some reason, in my head, as soon as you said that, I just imagine a bunch of witches running around with epilepsy.

I can see it.

Oh yeah they can.

Yeah, they cannot, they cannot. The reason I say it is it's disruptive to the quantum community is because I am essentially going to be saying that in regards to like Schrodinger's cat. Right, the cat was never in the box, right, But I'm hoping that they at least give it some

Yeah, which is where we get hurts frequency correct.

Yeah, So what they did was essentially when Maxwell came out with his paper, the Treaty between Electricity and Magnetism. In his paper, he had something called a quarter neon. You being an electrician, I'm sure you've heard of a quarter neon at least once or twice.

Yeah.

Right, So what they did at the time, it was too complicated to understand. It was too new, it was too fancy. Some even considered that it might have been just a little too far out there and somewhat spiritual. So because of the times, I mean, we got to think, this is eighteen eighties, so we're talking about a lot of industry building up all of that stuff. They ended up breaking his quarter neon equation down into essentially three

So for anybody who doesn't know what a quarter neon is. And the only reason I even read that, yeah, okay are you yeah? Okay, okay, okay. I heard it spoken of one time in college when I was we were talking about electric electrical theory and things like that. It was a subadendum. It was never like a thing we were graded on, but I recognized the word. I just looked up a little Wikipedia page on it. So all right, if you're already gonna go.

Over there, never mind, we're gonna yeah, we'll go over it, all right. So then relativity took off, quantum mechanics took off, and they continued going and going and going. And this is why I said, neither one realized that the ghost

And while you go and share the screen, listen, good cult members, if you haven't gained this information already, this is going to be an episode that has a lot of depth to it. You're gonna want to see what our boy Luke is sharing with us on this evening, and for all of those that would like to see it rather than just hear it Jonathan, where can they go?

Patreon dot com slash Cult of Conspiracy podcast. That link is down in the show notes below. It's the best way to be able to support us. We appreciate all the good Gold members who have done so on all

It's just too many. It's too many to even count. My brain doesn't work.

Whenever you start getting past twenty five, you know what I'm saying, I run out of fingers and toes. So if you like to be able to watch all the shows a couple of days in advance, you like it completely commercial free, you like to be able to slide into our dms, and you like to be able to see all the video content that you won't be able to see anywhere other than TikTok or Instagram or Twitter. Then you come over and you sign up for the

Absolutely.

So.

The big turning, just a realization that I had was that right around the same time that Einstein came out with relativity, there was another very interesting and amazing discovery that Maxwell had basically predicted or just calculated in general, and that is that photons right light, they transfer momentum, and if they transfer momentum, then that means that they must create pressure. Tests later on would absolutely confirm that they did both of those.

So now that's that's got of the minuscule, right, I mean, they recently just didn't experiment where they were able to freeze a photon, and and to that point, it means that it does have a physical for lack of better words, platform, So therefore it would give pressure if it's passing through the air. But at the same time, air is not a good medium to transfer energy through, especially if it's

We're not now when you're getting hit as many farts as the sun is hitting you with.

Okay, a lot of farts of the sun is thrown at us.

Yeah, but it's not like the photons.

It is, but it's not like we are feeling some sort of a pressure difference based off of the amount of light. Like on a cloudy day versus a sunny day, the air pressure is going to remain at least relatively the same. We might have barometric pressure that's a little different, but it's not based off of the sun, is it.

We'll find out.

Okay, I want to get your your your thoughts on this. I heard this theory the other day and I heard some scientists that were throwing it around, and the theory that light doesn't travel, that it's essentially just lighting up where it is almost like in the example that was given was like whenever you're at a football stadium and everybody's doing the wave, you know, it's not the wave

You know, significantly, Like.

When we're talking about like photons, for example, would a photon be traveling all the way around or would it just be lighting up in the medium call it the ether or whatever in that moment because of the momentum that you're talking about.

I find it incredibly interesting that you have brought this up at this time. Let's go all right, So after that finding, I essentially got to work. And these are the first principle, first principle like factors that I have. Right, So everybody that comes out with a theory, whether it's Newton, all of that, has the original starting factors, right, So like in the beginning, we had work, then we had forced,

Like you're you're saying that you're basically rethinking how mass works, but you're also stating.

Or how mass is created, how what mass comes from?

Okay, I mean, but then't that directly connected to the gravitational pull on an object? To say that you know one pound of titanium, Well, what makes it one pound? Because the gravitational force on this x amount of that material makes it way out to be about one pound. And isn't that what you're talking about? Or is there more to this?

I would say there's more to this, So like you have an actual so like for example, mass doesn't necessarily change, but weight changes with altitude. Right, yes, absolutely, right, So what if mass is as variable as that is not necessarily that it is derived straight from a force, but maybe it is more of a field action, which is exactly what Einstein was looking into. If you look at his later work before he ended up passing, he was trying to derive it from field interactions instead of it

But if that had to do with fields, like you're talking about them being on top of a mountain versus being below sea level, the field itself of the matter would be the field of the matter, regardless of what altitude it's at.

Not necessarily. Actually, quantum mechanics, because of their decoherence, would actually disagree with you.

Explain this please.

It's based off of just collapse delay, so like there is a point to where a matter starts getting lost.

I mean, so break this down here, Okay, So an example of this, if you were to boil a pot of water and you are in Denver, Colorado, it would take less temperature. It would take less degrees fahrenheit to boil that water than it would if you were in New Orleans, Louisiana. Now we are now talking about one hundred degree difference. We're talking about a few degrees. However, that being the case, atmospheric pressure on top of a mountain is a lot different than the atmospheric pressure below

H two.

Oh, let's make it the exact same medium that we're talking about boiling off. The boiling points are different based off of atmospheric pressure. You are saying that it has more to do with the mass field of the water depending on where it's located, rather than the atmospheric pressure that is pressing against the water to make it go to its evaporation point.

Right, So one, what is causing the atmospheric pressure? And to what is I mean? I guess that's really about it. What did you say before you said the atmosphere pressure?

So like to what's making the atmospheric pressure?

Oh so it would be really right, So it would really be thermal interactions and entropy.

Honestly, I get that it's been a while since I did the math on this, I used to calibrate the instrumentation that was reading these types of things for you know, specific gravity for certain materials and things like that. Correct me if I'm wrong, But at sea level, atmosphere pressure is fourteen point six nine six give or taken. We can call it fourteen point seven for shits and gigs here, and that is how much PSI we feel on top

I'm not telling that like Pokemon, you're good. Now you understand, Now you're good, because so like one thing. As of right now, in this paper, I have one hundred fifty eight equations. Some of them do deal with like interactions of what you're talking about. Every I'm not I have the document to go through just every match, but every single one of them has been worked out, and every single one of them matches all empirical tests, empirical data, because I wouldn't be here if I didn't. You know

What do you mean to have a field?

Like?

Right now, we're being bombarded with radio waves that we cannot pick up on unless we tune our radio to FM ninety eight one, FM one oh two five whatever the case, we're getting here to these radio waves. What do you mean by a field?

So if we didn't know like the going or the currently accepted theories, if we didn't know about Newtonian gravitation, or if we didn't know about relativity, right, everything that you're doing would still be the same because you don't know about the field interactions going on in the background.

I mean that's fair. Gravity existed before Isaac Newton put words to it, that's for.

Sure, right. So what I am doing is I am looking for the background field that is allowing these interactions to happen. Okay, So where we're just looking at like a book, we're looking at the cover, I'm saying that there is a whole novel behind that cover.

Well, and I've always believed that there's a lot more, too than what meets the eye. I've heard this quote that that basically says that science can only explain what something does, It doesn't explain what something is.

Welcome to what I'm doing here, let's go. So I am. I am doing my best to provide causality to everything and determinism. Put determinism back into it to show that everything actually does happen on a scientific level to an almost one percent expected way, like whether it's an event or whether whatever it is, it is one hundred percent

You mean on the periodic table?

Yeah, yeah, because like the quantum understanding of all elements, it like they have their own interpretation of what's going on.

I mean kind of yes, kind of no, Right, there's some elements on the periodic table that only exist in a specific environment and only for a certain amount of time before it disintegrates into something else. That's why we had that whole subudendum of two lines underneath it, like germanium, americanium, californium and these types of things.

Right, And that's why it is so hard for them to try to figure out what's going on there, because one, they are very short lived. In two, there are a lot of interactions going on there, especially when we're talking about the strong and weak nuclear forces. Whenever we're talking about electron orbitals or probability density clouds, stuff like that, it gets really hard to start juggling all of that based off of probability. Okay, So, like that's essentially what

And and quantum science is a relatively I mean it it's one of the newest sciences out there. I mean actually, just this year is the centennial for quantum mechanics.

Right, So once that split from maxwell equation happened, that that was essentially the birth of relativity and the birth of quantum. But because quantum has to rely on probability so much, it is now just well, you could say the last twenty to thirty years, technology has caught up to be able to account for what quantum is predicting, right right, Okay, all right, So now we get to

That's a whole lot of Greek letters.

Tell me about it, dude, tell me about it.

Looks like Sigma Fi Kappa fraturns. He opened his bitch.

I'm just saying, tell me about it. I did leave it unitless because in quantum mechanics there is something called decoherence, and it is essentially the opposite of what I am saying here, because obviously, if you have a value of decoherence, which shows basically things breaking apart, losing structure, all of that,

I do have a question though, just out of curiosity, and I don't know if this applies to what you're talking about, but I've often said in the past that I believe that it's possible that the Earth is its own double toroid kind of structure, and or at least it's encompassed inside of one. And with that there is the plane of inertia. Now, just out of curiosity, if that does apply the plane of inertia inside the double toroid to the Earth, would the plane of inertia be equal to sea level?

There's a lot of depending factors on that. I wouldn't say absolutely, I would say it's probably close to it. I wouldn't say it's one hundred percent, though we will actually get there and I will give you the explanation as to I mean really not only what the double toroid is, but what causes it?

Good, I mean, just thinking about this out loud, does that mean like the peak of Mount Everest in the first sum that would say, like the flat earth model, right, that would still coincide with the plane of inertia in a double toroid. Otherwise it couldn't exist. But I never thought about it like that. How does sea level as opposed to high altitudes shift in the double to roid model? Honest, I've never even thought about that.

The plane of inertia, it can exist on a flat earth or on a globe.

I mean, you're it.

Doesn't necessarily mean just a flat surface plane, you know, it's it's just the plane of inertia. That would be like I always look at it as like that's the ground that we would walk on, you know that that would be the mid the midway between the as above and the so below.

So right, you could essentially just put it in the middle of anything and it would be a correct plane of inertia. It would just matter sea.

Level above sea level, inside of a submarine, wherever the case is.

Right exactly, Yeah, I'm gonna try to do my best without taking structure away from this and also without boring the absolute shit out of everyone at home. So that's why I like, uh, like I said, by the time this episode is released, this will be available to the public for everybody to go through, look through whatever they want to do. So if I know, I skipped over scalar field potential just a little bit. It is similar to Einstein's space time, but it does have some differences

Interesting, what would be an example of that.

So when you have they've done tests with this. When you drop a box right and that box, say it has ice in it, so that box has reached its full acceleration due to like terminal velocity. Well, once that ice is melted in there and that drop is able to basically do its own thing. It actually hits the bottom of the box, it continues fallowing down, So obviously there is something else going on other than just pure acceleration due to mass.

Okay, all right, yeah, I can see that.

Continuing on through. I do have time added into this, so it is just an expression of coherence divided by the rate of loss of coherence. It has to deal with radioactive decay, could be photon travel in scalar null zones, which we will get to. A lot of people will love that. Fusion event durations and rebound intervals. Boy, saying all of this out loud really makes it seem the most boring.

No, it doesn't make it seem the most boring. It makes it seem like it will go over the heads of a lot of the uneducated or uninitiated in the realm of the world of physics in high level mathematics.

Right now and once. This is why the next part that we get to will help a lot more with visual I just needed to insert the first principle value so you at least knew somewhat of what they were, what they came from. All of that, I mean, mass is most people just know mass, but it is not. I'm defining it not as a intrinsic substance, but as a amount of field pressure retained a cross a coherent shell and spread radius normalized by propagating propagating propagation energy

And again, for anybody who would like to see that, Patreon, you're gonna be able to pause this and go deeper and read more and make those equations on your own piece of paper that you may have to try to work that for yourself. Honestly, I don't speak ancient Greek, so a lot of those letters do not make sense to my mathematical brain. But yeah, some of you out there are highly educated that will be able to break all that down for yourselves.

So I'm so after the first few episodes we did, yeah, I was somewhat like tired of science. After this, I feel like I have forgotten way more than I like remember because it's just like, yeah, this is just filled in so much stuff of me just trying to remember it, trying to effectively teach everybody out there what it is all saying in a simple way that doesn't also take away from what it's saying, you know what I mean? Right, So this is the big paper. It is extremely large.

Uh.

This is a table that explains exactly what the one to one comparisons are. Now we get to a interesting part that will catch a lot of people's attention. Coherence nulls where the field cancels. So when two scalar emissions of equal magnitude but opposite vector overlap, they cancel. Essentially, imagine two waves in the ocean hitting each.

Other rights, positive equals and negative.

Basically, yes, yes, that was a good representation of it. So it is the net coherence equals coherence of the first wave subtracted by coherence of the second wave. This is obvious equal, easy the equation to go through. Once it hits zero, this is called a coherence null. At this point, there is no acceleration, there is no pressure flow, There is interestingly enough, no flow of time. There is no emission visibility. This actually explains within acoustic levitation. They

Yeah, I've seen them make a stream of water go up back into its container with frequency, or at least give the appearance that it is anyway. So yeah, it's like, I don't know. I mean, there's there's stories of monks being able to use sound energy to move rocks that weigh multiple tons strictly off of the resonance of their sound ways off their voice. I mean, I don't know where the truth versus myth starts and ends on that.

Know, correct, So through this theory, I am saying that actually both of those are possible because you know how you've always stated that when we're talking about creating energy, right, your voice is a little bit different.

Right.

This is one of the ways that this jumps the gap and is an all encompassing unified field theory because your voice acts as a source of emission pressure which has direct interactions with this scaler field.

Interesting.

Uh, that's not specific in this paper, but that is the extensions that I will start going into, like after this is released. But one of the biggest things about the acoustic levitation experiments is they are now starting to find out in situations to where they use a lower frequency than they should be using and a larger object than they should be able to levitate. They are doing it perfectly fun when all laws of acoustic levitation basically

Isn't that the same thing, harmonic versus acoustic.

No, because you can do harmonic levitation within a vacuum chamber, and obviously you cannot do acoustic levitation in a vacuum chamber as long as you match the correct frequencies. Because in this theory, and realistically in just any theory, frequency is basically the heartbeat of what you are using. It's not just a wave or how the wave works. It

I mean, that's fair.

They definitely were on a lot more shit than we give them credit for. I mean, especially it if that is true that whenever the wind blows into the King's chamber, that wind blows and then it resonates at a certain frequency. They got that math figured out, like man, what forethought?

Yeah? Yeah, honestly, Now, the issue is I knew some of the deeper implications that could happen with this theory. So I did put actually like ethical restraints on this when we're talking about like if this is real, Yeah, we we have things that we need to talk about

Would this be what he classified as his death ray?

No, okay, I actually haven't done much looking into his deathray just because one I I'm it kind of sounds like a do to me, like a direct energy weapon.

It could be, but I could also see it. To the again uninitiated and educated, it might seem like that's what it is. In reality, it might be a byproduct of his equipment. Like you're saying, like he found that this device and this type of math could destroy buildings, cause cracks in the earth, and whatever else. To a layman's person that's just walking around and would see this, they would obviously call it a death ray. Yeah, they lose their shit exactly.

I mean, it could have been honestly, the precursor for a maser. Okay, because for anybody that doesn't know, before lasers, we had masers.

They were playing what a maser is instead of a laser?

I think it's just instead of light, it's magnetism. Ah if I remember correctly, or it might be microwaves. I'm not one hundred percent sure. Okay, all right, So going over the ethical framework of this, yes, they are not a joke. So dese he confirms that these are not metaphors. They are a result of strong scaler coherence effects because Tesla was pushing way more power than the typical person would ever even think of doing, because that's just how

Right?

A quarter neon is a four part hyper complex number for the simple not really simple terms, but for the simple description of it. Because science actually treats like waveforms and geometry and all of that, they just treated as numbers. So for example, where we get described a particle, quantum says there actually isn't a particle there, It is just a field function.

I mean, but that makes sense though in the realm of science you have to have it quantifiable in some way for it to make sense on paper. So it will make sense that to them, a quarter neon, it's not a thing.

Americal representation, right, right, right, So you have q, which is quarter neon equals A plus bi plus CJ plus d K. I promise you it is not as difficult as that sounds. That is Maxwell's interpretation of the quarter neon, which he, in my opinion, did a really good job. But with DT we switch it up a little bit. So A is going to be essentially the scalar component.

It, right, Okay, So I looked it up here It says in mathematics, the quarter neon number system extends the complex numbers. Quarter neons were first described by the Irish mathematician William Hamilton in eighteen forty three and applied to mechanics in three dimensional space. Long story short, the A plus bi plus cj plus dk, the coefficients abcd are real numbers. And let me make sure I get this right here. Yeah, and one, I and K are all basis vectors or basis elements.

Right, so you show a picture of a quarter neon, you are going to send Jonathan down a rabbit hole.

You know what I'm gonna do that. I'm gonna do that. Let me let me share the screen real quick. Save your spot on where you're at on your page.

Yeah, you're good, You're good. I'm again. I'm sorry to bor everybody. I just getting getting the baseline out there is a little bit dry sometimes until we get into the fun stuff.

No, I mean, but this is pretty crazy. I mean, like I said, quarter neons were shown to me in college by one of my electrical theory professors, but very very basically, it was not something that we spent a whole lot of time talking about because for the base level math that we were doing for electrical theory, basically Ohm's law was like the one to oh one of it, right,

Of it all correct.

Kind of looks like a Mercaba right here we.

Go, little flower of life action. Bruh.

Think about the other one. Think about the first one, the main one. When we're talking about sacred geometry.

I talking about the you know, talking about the golden ratio. Well, I guess in that regard it would be. But are you talking about like the hermetic symbolism.

Keep keep hermetic out of it, Keep hermetic out of it, and just go off of that one book that some people say should be in the Bible and some people should say it shouldn't. Oh well, Enoch, right, So look at that compared to Metatron's cube.

Okay, matter of fact, I could look up picture of metatrons cube real quick.

Absolutely, yeah, just to just to give people entertainment.

Yeah, and again if you want to see what we're talking about.

I know it's dry. I know it's dry.

Wow, gotcha?

All right? So oh you got to pull it up. There you go, there it is. Yeah, it looks fucking identical.

Absolutely that as compared to the mathematical representation of a quarter neon.

Turn it turn the I know, I don't know if you can actually do it on there. But if you turn the Metatron's cube just a little bit to its side to where like the flat part lays like you know, perpendicular or just horizontal, whatever you want to say, it is almost a one for one with a quarter neon.

Wow, hold up, let me let me pull up that representation.

Oh quarterneon.

Okay, yeah, go to the one all the way to the right. Whenever you're seeing that it's like right above that. Yeah, that's a better representation of it.

Okay, wow, yeah that is.

Yeah, it's as if oh yeah, it's just putting it on its side essentially, because these are the flat sides of the uh of the Metatron's cube, and so yeah, it's just turning it.

That's actually that's a different depiction than what the actual, like I guess drawing of Metatron's cube is because that's got some extra added on to it, right.

The two in the middle. That kind of that's kind of thrown me off because Metatron's cube has six in the middle. The quarter neon has two in the middle. But I'm it's not the.

Reasons for that. Sure, there's actually a reason for that. Okay, So going into the update I basically gave the quarter neon. So quarter neons were designed to represent both rotation and orientation in three dimensional space, but they also contain a scalar origin term. Unlike modern vector calculus, which separates magnitude and direction, quarter neons unify them into a single structure.

Go head back to sharing your screen there, Luke, so we can see what you're.

Yeah, no doubt. I just needed to share it to get the visual representations of a cornyon.

So right, anyway, So how I re establish an envision and also formulize it. Essentially, the most of the equation is actually there. I just give values to it. So we have the scalar field potential essentially the origin of the emission, two coherent field vectors along the shell axis, and then a torsional aspect of the rebound pulse that it's creating because all of these have a essentially a shell to them. This shell is similar to Schrodinger's harmonic shells.

When you say the Higgs field, do you mean possibly in reference to the Higgs boson.

Yes, so the Higgs field is also a thing as of right now. Quantum mechanics believes that mass is accumulated from the Higgs field, and it just comes from there as it is popping in and out of reality.

Okay, and the Higgs Boson particle would be what some would call the god particle. Right, So, if you're saying that this is the field to where things basically are in and out of reality, the comparisons that can be drawn are vast.

Right, exactly, It's really not different. They're just kinda they're not able to actually give a structure to it because they're missing that part of it. Essentially, Einstein took it and gave it to relativity. Okay, So that's why I was saying, they have to rely on probability because they have no structure. So yes, for them, in order for their work to actually be correct, probability has to be

You're good. I'm just this is you're essentially saying that Einstein's entire life work is inaccurate.

But it's.

Fair. But it's also not, like you said in the beginning, it's not that it's inaccurate and like just basically flat out Einstein was wrong. He was right for the day and age and the information that he had to work with, but that doesn't mean that it can't be revised and improved upon.

Right correct, So I would say everything that relativity did, whether general or special, is core wrecked within the framework that Einstein wrote for it, or whether it was his partner no ether, which we don't have to get into the the name there. Then on the other side, everything that quantum mechanics was, you know, basically evolved from and

Gotcha.

So here's where we get to the fun part. So now that we've gone through the quarter neon, we know what it looks like through this. I was able to do a few things, Like I said, this is a large paper.

How long have you been working on.

This since we ended? I remember I said I was going to take a break. I didn't. Right, right, right, all right, So we get to article mass also with scaler masses. So one of the interesting things was whenever I took my variables that I created, that I introduced in the very beginning, right, emission pressure, coherence, radial dispersion. Obviously the speed of light squared was already there. I was able to do some very interesting things with it. So when you take give me one second, sorry, it

Talking about a particle's coefficients, you're talking about its coherence, correct, all right, but break it down for somebody who may not know what the fuck you're talking about.

This is essentially coherence is how structured and how well, uh, something interacts with the field. It's basically how well is this doing exactly what it's supposed to be doing? Right? So, like, for example, with jello, and you're punching it, and it's still like even though it shakes around, it still keeps its structure. So it would have a either fluctuating coherence because that is what liquids have, or it would have just a higher coherence to be able to maintain its structure.

And that kind of makes sense though, right, I mean objects in motion, and especially if we're talking about the atomic level, centrifugal force plays a factor in that, right, the same way of what keeps you up right while you're on a bicycle. Right, it's not that you way less, but the centrifical motion of the tires and you balance on top of it gives you a different mass. You still weigh the same, your mass is still the same, but in motion, there's different mass that equates on that.

Is actually where the current model and I disagree because they don't necessarily one hundred percent acknowledge that a proton has mass. I actually give reason as to why it's masked or why it has mass, because remember, all of these particles are pulsing, they're emitting pressure.

Not always When does a proton not have mass?

I thought a photon, Sorry, Okay, not a proton.

We're talking about pentoton a light yeah. Okay, hold on, now I know for effect, protons, neutrons, and electrons all have some sort of a quark mass. Okay, we're about photons of light.

Yeah yeah, my bad, My bad. Okay, So we have the electron mass, we have proton mass. I actually the mass that I calculated for each of these. It matches another one of those scientific rules, which is the proton to electron mass ratio. It is too exact as to so my calculation here is to the exact ratio that

We didn't name them. Blame the people with the hydron collider. They're the ones that did that.

Yeah, the top quark, bottom quark, neutrino. And then finally, sorry everybody, we get to the photon rest mass and the photon in motion mass. Now, one thing that is interesting is because remember we were talking about emission pressure, right, Yeah, as a photon is traveling, it is creating emission pressure.

So very similar to how we know we have a fifth, sixth eighth dimension. We know it's there because the math equates to such. There's no way of us to perceive it with our human minds or eyes or any of these things, but we know that it physically does exist. I'm with you.

I would actually say that you can interact with it.

What do you mean?

So when we talk about anything entering the quantum realm, right, this goes through a process of decoherence, so essentially the opposite of my coherence value. Right, So as decoherence drops, that is, whenever that particle enters what they call the quantum realm, which is what some people interpret as like you know, the DMT realm or the spiritual realm or

A lower dimension like as in the second or a higher is in the fourth or fifth.

A lower one. Once your coherence raises to a certain extent, it will go to the possible higher dimension.

So from your research, would the d M t roalme be considered a lower or higher dimension. I know a lot of people think that taking psychedelics raises your vibrational frequency and therefore puts you in the fourth or fifth dimension. But the way you're talking makes it sounds it's bringing you to the lower or second dimension.

Don't hate me, guys.

No hate. I'm saying, per your what you have found right, and I can.

I haven't gone through it yet to figure out like how many actual layers there are For all I know, like I may have to adjust coherence for different dimensions to where it might go to like negative one, to say, like negative one is where all of the you know, evil spirits or however you want to say it is, and maybe something like the DMT realm is kind of in between.

Okay, he might?

I mean, could you even say that whenever people go to the quote unquote DMT realm, that it's the same exact realm, I because I've done in one night, I did DMT twice and it seemed that they were definitely not of the same place.

But that's what you're saying. So you doing different amounts brought your coherence level two different levels. Therefore you were able to see different dimensions. Am I about on track here?

Luke? Yes, you are correct, Okay, okay.

So, but the same could be said for somebody having a couple of shots and getting completely trashed, or somebody needing an entire fifth of jack to get completely trash. It depends person a person to get the same quote unquote effect, but either way it goes. You're talking about lowering your coherence level in order to I guess be more perceptive to the lower dimensions.

Uh yeah, I mean pretty much for the most part. You also do it while you're dreaming as well. This is why you go through the different brain waves or the brain stages while you're sleeping.

Okay, now, I'm glad you brought this up. Now with dreaming, for instance, would that be a higher coherence level or would that also be lower.

That would need to be measured to depend on how what is exactly happening to your brain waves at the exact time. So you could say, like you know how your brain goes through the different like actual wave sequences, why you're going through the different stages of sleep. Yeah,

It's probably largely based upon the frequency that you're emitting.

Right, because yes, because the frequency is essentially the whole heartbeat of the energy. So depending on what's going on there, it changes the value. So if your frequency has changed and your emission pressure, for example, has gone down, then coherence will go down with it. There is there's a direct relationship between what goes up with what's going on or what goes down all of that.

Yeah, that makes sense. That makes sense just in general.

You know, if you look at the like the frequency scale or the even just the emotional scale, for example, like somebody who is angry and mad and frustrated or

Absolutely absolutely so. Continuing to go through, we finally have gluons. From what I have seen, there is zero mass. They are a torsion only scaler pulse, so they are actually part of that quarter neon one of the rotational aspects of it or the torsion aspect of it. Interestingly enough, gluons are what are thought to hold like quarts together, right, So that actually matches basically one hundred percent to what

Yeah.

Yeah, that gets you almost right exact on the spot. Okay, me, I promise that there is a method to the madness. I will. I do have a document that goes through how I derive or calculate every single universal constant across science. I also, as we see in the next slide, Sorry before we go, so, dark matter is not, in my opinion, in my theory and actual thing. It is more of a glue ball field signature, which is a particle. As you can see up here, it is torsional bound shell

I know it really is, but I mean it's that's kind of the point though, right right.

It sounds a lot more complicated than it actually is. It is just a matter of just imagine the ocean right just waves as energy pulses just going out coming in. This keeps everything together. And not only that, but it also causes magnetism because as we went through the basically the right hand rule, the curl of magnetism is encoded within the quarter neons as long as they have an actual torsional value. Not all of them do, as we'll see.

Oh sure, it's only one hundred and eighty or is this more of one of those infinity conversations.

Once you get to one hundred and eighty, it could turn into an infinity conversation. But from what I've seen, the energy is actually just dispersed back into the field. So you can argue that there just is no element created. That is one of the that's one of the ways that conservation of energy is met. Anytime energy is lost anything like that, it's not actually lost, it disperses back into the field.

Okay.

One of the interesting things is once we get to where's that? So you see how one thirty two, right, whenever we're looking at this value right here in the middle, it is actually the scalar potential, right, Yeah, it actually locks into very similar to hydrogen, right, the very first element. If I'm going to be real with you, you know how in the first periodic table, Mendelev had ether as the first element.

He was honest, it's something that can't be measured, so it couldn't fit on the periodic table even know, it's something that we know connects things.

But correct, you correct, it's actually because when he said ether, I think he meant light. So remember how I told you that a photon has in motion mass and rest mass.

Yeah, so.

A phototon the rest right, the rest mass, So that one actually is the first building block you can actually are they combined together through the field in order to start creating hydrogen. Then we continue on down. It's essentially just light folding in on itself continuously through these field interactions, because remember, light is just energy. Atoms are just energy. Mass is just energy. Even Einstein himself stated that he knew it had to be through a field function because

I mean, but that's the case, then how did the periodic table get built in the first place with all the atomic masses being stagnant in that way.

Because of the quarter neon values. So the quarter neon is the field structure that actually drives all of the elements to be exactly the way that they are. So when we start at the beginning, right, So remember this tea is the torsional value. You do not actually get a spin until you get to lithium, right. Okay, Hydrogen and helium do not spin even though they have electron, They do not.

Spin ME one and two respectively.

Right. So lithium once it gets that third proton and electron, in order to overcompensate for that electron, it actually has to start spinning in order to keep it. Okay, this is what starts a whole spinning. Just relationship between all of the elements. One interesting thing, So my decay time equation for lithium especially or really just lithium ion. Right, So basically there's the lithium that has that extra electron

What's that?

Around seventy seconds? Wow?

And just so we're clear here, whenever you're talking about it having a rotation, you don't mean the electron rotating around the nucleus, because every atom does that. You mean the nucleus itself spinning in cope like in unison with the electron.

Right, So if you look at the actual quarter neon diagram again, the outside is an exact reflection of the inside. So the inside as it starts turning, this causes the outside to turn in a I think it's actually a perpendicular direction. So now when you have that, right, when you have that quarter neon per Maxwell's were the best way to actually describe what is going on there, Imagine a gyroscope. Okay, yeah, so you have just wheels spinning

I figured that would be what we would call a fucking star.

I don't know, it sounds horrible to say. I'm like saying it out loud.

I mean, I mean, I get it. Yeah, the twelve year old in me is like a white hole enough, But like on some real levels here, a white hole being a equal in opposite of a black hole, wouldn't we just call that a star?

Not necessarily, because that would imply that the exit of a black hole is into the center of a star.

Not inherently. I mean, yeah, we're going off with the whole Ying Yang conversations nsure.

But well, I mean, a yanang is just a symbolic representation of what you said. You have to have an equal and opposite, but.

The two don't have to be connected, right, Like the equal and opposite don't have to be inherently linked to each other like physically. To say, like a black hole leads to the inside of a star, like that's that's like a necessarily electivity.

Then obviously it has to come out somewhere, and if it is a star, to where it comes out, then it has to have that exit point somewhere in the star.

But then that would basically just burn to a crisp inside the star. So it's not like anybody would.

See that now, because relativity is just geometry. That's one of the issues that Einstein ran into because he did not actually have a field of energy. He just had geometry. Hmm.

Okay, So for.

Everybody that says toroids are everything and they're just nested toroids inside of each other, you are absolutely one correct halflee because you are missing the quarter neon inside that is causing that exact toroidal field. But not every element is going to create that toroidal field. For example, hydrogen helium don't turn so they're not going to do it.

Loosely like inert elements that don't have covalent electrons and are not looking looking for any more or anything like that. Do they spin?

Yes?

Neon are gone these things?

Yes?

Okay.

So, for example, the torsional values that all of these have, they're all empirically like that is the rotation for them. I guess you could say, because torsion and rotation aren't exactly the same thing. But torsion causes rotation, so like torsion is the cause, rotation is the effect.

Okay, I'm with you.

So it's it's not the same because you got to remember what we're talking about here. There is differences between an apple and an apple. But that's basically it explained. So the torsion ends up making it have to spin. Okay, I'm trying to remember what comes after this. Oh, I'll just go to the Uh give me one second, everybody.

Take your time. Man. I'm I'm trying to wrap my head around everything you're talking about here. And I know I would like to think of myself as an educated individual, but you're talking about things that even some of the most advanced minds of our day and age are still like heavily debating in their circles of highly educated intellectuals.

It's wow, Oh absolutely this is this is basically getting in the trenches of it.

Yeah.

So this is what you could call a compliance packet. This is the one for one relationships between my equations comparative to the standard equations. So we have standard gravity, this is my equation for it. Continue on to time dilation, red shift, electromagnetism, quantum collapse. And then this is the equations for all of the universal constants, which is gravitation, planks, constant fine structure, magnetic permeability, electric permittivity, mass I even provide.

I mean again, like I just said, they didn't experiment where they actually froze a photon particle, right, So we know for a fact that, yeah, like the speed of light, light being a physical thing, not just a reaction of a thing happening. It is at least something that we can freeze and collect and trap. Therefore it can be quantified. There is a mass to it, there is inherent physics to it. So I'm with you.

Correct. Basically all of these as of right now are actually leaning towards my prediction and my equations. I always fuck up this one. But like Reigian, however, they actually say it frameworks. Essentially, it's just vector formatting all of that formulation. It's what they use for like relativity and all that stuff. I actually get around it. I don't need any tensor or the L word frameworks to do it. It all works off of just similar events to like

I remember hearing about it.

Yeah, So essentially what it was was two large lead balls that were suspended from a rod that also had two other smaller lead balls that were suspended from a different rod. This is how Cavendish actually proved the basically everything that Newton was saying, right, because he observed that the smaller ball would end up being gravitationally attracted to the larger ball just because of the mass difference the

I mean, there's no reason why the mass should be mathing right.

So unless I was at least somewhat correct, there's no reason why my values from my just first principles that I created based off of all these other observed effects, with ignoring that mass is emergent there's no real reason why all of this should line up unless this basically scalar field that I am talking about that I am outlining actually exists. Whow So then we go even further. If you remember the other the other night whenever we

A triple toroid.

Yes, huh, And it actually tells a lot as to why life started from or is based off of carbon, because carbon has the best values to keep its structure under pretty decent damage or any kind of outside effects on it. This is uranium. Uh, stuff gets start starts getting pretty wild for or radioactive elements because their emission pressure along with their radial dispersion starts getting very chaotic and too high for the element to actually hold together. Yeah,

There are room connecting it to the next right uh.

This is actually a further like shell that is out. They do not last long at all.

Like that, think one of those elements only exists in a certain condition and only for so long.

I got you right now. One of the issues with especially like the large hydron collider, the reason why they can't make any elements past one eighteen isn't necessarily because they don't last long enough. It is that in a field where you are using just brute force like the collider is using, you are creating extreme temperatures. You were putting you know, magnetism and energy everywhere. Everything is actually too chaotic for an element to actually form. It all

All right, I'm gonna need you to full on break this down so that a dummy could understand exactly what you mean.

What is First?

Let me ask you this, what was your purpose in doing this research? Was there an end goal that you were searching for? Or is this a rabbit hole that kept on going dig deeper and deeper and deeper And you know what were you trying to get to with all of this? If you could dumb it down for us.

I wouldn't say there was an endpoint because honestly, it seems like there has been just a continuance to be able to just go to a different field. I can say that like from Tesla's work. Not a single thing that he has done, from what I've seen, is wrong. So there are a lot of aspects of that that we can go into. Actually, this is really really interesting. I actually developed a test that I was going to try to do in order to basically prove that everything

Mean kind of motion detector would be there, so if there was motion, it would in fact detect it. But I don't know how you're going to get a motion detector that's going to be small enough to pick up on atomic movement.

Oh, this is just for this isn't necessarily like any quantum behavior. This is for anything. So like you could just put a five gallon bucket of ferrofluid or just filled with pizo crystals inside of a Faraday cae age inside of a vacuum chamber, so that way you make sure that like there's no air pressure getting pushed on it. There's no there's nothing to interact with it because you

It has to go somewhere, right.

It flows inside of the least dense area, which is the null. So there you go with what Tesla was saying about energy being in the air. It would absolutely I don't see why it wouldn't work.

Okay, so free energy talking about the ether basically is what you're trying to say that it.

Does not ether because this all of this works just a little bit differently than the ether. So like, for example, remember the the Michael and Morley tests or the experiment that they did to where they essentially proved that the ether wasn't real. Remind us, I don't remember exactly what the experiment fully entailed, but basically they didn't detect any movement in like the flowing ether. It's because the ether's

Michael and Morley experiment. Alright, let's check it out. Ummm okay, I got a video of Neo Degrass Tyson explaining this theory. But you don't know if we don't want to watch that or not. Yeah, I know, right, let's see special relativity one Michael Morley experiment. Huh okay, got a couple of different videos that could do a decent job of explaining it, but we don't have to go down that road.

It's it's what I know. I know this is a very science dent episode, and I I know it was boring, but there are very interesting and very fun parts of this, such as like the null levitation, such as.

The ooh, okay, let's check this out, says the greatest failed experiment ever. This is the Michael Morley experiment.

Let's check out for disguise.

Do you think, oh man, of course there's gonna be a commercial makes sense, I'm telling you for anybody who is listening, yeah, Patreon, as we talked about commercial free listening, listen, we deal with it on Orient two. All right, let's see this is a four minute video explaining what they say is the greatest failed experiment ever. And you're saying that this proved that the ether was not real.

So that is what they say, Yes, all right, let's.

Check it out.

There were lots of things scientists believed a century or two ago that might sound weird to us today. For one thing, they once thought that Adams looked like plum pudding. But over time, as researchers have done more experiments and developed new theories, those ideas have evolved into the science we know today. One of the most game changing experiments ever was what's known as the Michaelson Morley experiment, not because of what it did find, but because of what

Okay, fair enough, now, I gotta say, just looking at that experiment and how they had it set up, I mean, aside from it proven that the ether doesn't exists or whatever, they're talking about the speed of light being off by a fraction of a cunt hair and them being able to register this in the eighteen hundreds, even they we still arguably don't even have the equipment that could make

Exist, right, And that's what there. They didn't necessarily prove that the ether doesn't exist. They proved that it doesn't move in the way that they thought it does. One of the differences between this type of scalar field and the ether, this is not necessarily e theoric. I mean, if you want to be honest, like when you think about the ether, it helped propagate the light, right, it helped it move through, it helped it actually gain just what it was as a whole. And this is very

Okay, I mean even, like you said, the Higgs boson particle, like they knew it existed in the seventies, they just couldn't capture or quantify it until twenty twelve, right, So I mean they the ether has been used since the earliest days.

Of alcohol a long time. Yeah, for just to.

Put a moniker one of those Greek letters for lack of better words, on the unattainable. They knew that it had to exist in order to make the equation make sense, but it was something that they didn't have the right framework to actually quantify in some way, right, So I mean to compare the ether to the Higgs boson, that's kind of I see what you mean, But I feel like we're also trying to compare like Japanese language to Aztec language. Like it's not even we're not even in the same ballpark here.

Oh yeah, I get what you're saying. Yeah, but the the field structure itself is essentially the same as what they were predicting back then, except with quantum foam. There actually isn't any structure. It's just all energy. That's why when they hit a certain decoherence per their terminology, it goes into the quantum realm, it just vanishes. It's because it doesn't have the structure that's actually supposed to be

Gotcha, Hm, wow.

Yeah, there's gonna be some more interesting things coming up when I do go into I guess you could say more of the sacred geometry, when I go into some of the ripples that have been seen going across the moon. When I go into, for example, this theory, actually one outlines that what Royal Rife did is absolutely correct what he did the Rife machine.

Ah well, yeah, we know that works for like motherfucker. Which for the record, anybody wants to check that out real rife technologies use the promo code cult at checkout anyway. Right.

But I am showing that it works all the way from a actual field structure, because, as I showed you carbon, we're all just energy. Yes, when people say that we are just energy. You are one hundred percent correct, and the same type of things that will cause decoherence. For example, when you're taking if psychedelics lowers your decos coherence, it's all the same effects. It all translates over interesting.

So, in your opinion, what can raise your decoherence possibly puts you in the a higher level of dimensional understanding or something like this.

If not for substance, so would actually be So there's three parts of it. You have coherence, which is just the normal variable for it. Right, once it starts lowering, you enter a state of decoherence. Once it gets past the point of being able to retain its structure without some kind of outside influence, it actually hits a point of.

Incoherence, incoherent to our human mind or incoherent on a mathematical platform both. I mean, what do you mean here? Again, we have MATT that equates to the twelfth dimension. Just our human brains would never be able to perceive any dimension outside of our own, but we know that it exists.

Mathematically speaking, that's only due to string theory, which still hasn't actually been proven yet. I mean, it's just what the math is saying but I can actually attribute partial of string theory to this because you remember Tesla having the mirrored effects underneath him in the ground, right, Yeah, so understand that every celestial object is indeed a extremely large quarter neon, You're going to have that same mirrored effect. This is mostly where I believe that that statement of

Interesting, go a little deeper in that. What do you mean?

So there is actually, but literally a literally validity behind saying that the celestial alignment affects your mood. It actually does have a almost direct, almost type of string theory type of effect on you.

Is that negligible or minuscule or are you saying like clearly because mercury is in rich are grade that's why all the white women are losing their shit this week.

I'm just asking it now, You're good. It depends on the state of the individuals to begin with. If they are at a high coherence to begin with, no, they're not going to really be affected by it. If they are at a already unstable state, then yeah, it might push them over the edge.

But then the same could be said for pretty much anything. If you are a person that is pretty sure of yourself and you've got your goals in mind, you got places you're going, outside forces are not really gonna be you up. If you're somebody who's easily swayed by the smallest thing, the smallest obstacle getting in your way is going to be the entire world crashing down, then obviously any small thing is going to set you off. That's that's kind of a painting with a broad brush, don't you think?

Not really, it's just the you could because I remember, coherence has to do with not necessarily exactly memory, but it has to do with structure, It has to do with organization, It has to do with actual like what you're doing at a field level. So your coherence could actually fluctuate depending on your brain waves, what actual interactions you're causing with your thoughts, what interaction you're causing with

So somebody whose brain operates at a very high frequency of one of the very alpha dominant person types, who doesn't really matter if the sun came up or not this morning, we got shit to do today. We got to go, go go, as opposed to somebody who has a lower brainwave frequency that if one thing goes wrong, if they if they're making their morning cup of coffee,

And for anything, unless you're a fully fucking enlightened individual, there's going to be a little bit of fluctuation. I don't care how hard you are, if you're fucking David Goggins and you're out there just you know, talking shit to yourself all day, trying to be as big and bad and you know, buff as you possibly can.

He has highs and lows. Everybody does. Nobody is.

Nobody is flat like flatlining it depending on whatever your frequency is. I mean, that's that's why we drink coffee, that's why we drink energy drinks, that's why we have fucking vapes. It's all to basically try and get us to a like a steady level playing.

Ground in which we're comfortable operating in.

I mean, I get that too, but a perfect example there's a difference between Goggins and the person that is blaming mercury and retrograde for why they're weak as shit. There's like clear differences between the two.

Well, there's differences in everybody, but that doesn't mean that one is going to be less or more affected by the alignment of the stars.

How how what do you mean?

How?

I mean? I can't if we're saying.

If Goggins is affected by the stars, it is to such a minute level that it would be called negligible, Like it's not something that actually affects his day to day. It might affect a thing, but it's not going to like decide the course of events for him, you know.

Yeah, but most of that shit is going on, like shit that you're dealing with internally, bro, it's not necessarily outwardly world.

That's what he's saying, is that the outward world affects our inner world. That's his whole thesis.

Right, And it's up to you to determine exactly how you're going to express that outwardly. But it first has to affect you inwardly. Wouldn't you think it has to go through that filter that filter field interactions Okay, yeah, I mean to say that somebody is not affected by it is ridiculous.

So for example, like you know how some people when they walk into a room, they just light up the whole room, right, Yeah, that could actually be formulized in this theory depending on their like, once scans and tests are done to actually like calculate the real values, that could be formually shown to be an actual thing.

Hmm.

Okay, I could actually formulaly show after scans are done that maybe Alzheimer's is just a form of entropy.

What do you mean, So.

It's just entropy in science, is just a disorder, right, So it's like instead of it's essentially the same as the coherence factor, it is a but it's in the opposite, it's essentially decoherence, right. So it is just losing structure, It is losing the actual rebound of everything, the shape of whatever you're thinking, the thoughts that you have. It could actually be entropy at its at its hole, at its base level.

So you're saying that Alzheimer's could be just a version of brain entropy.

Yeah, at the smallest level, Yes, at the field level where we are measuring brain waves, we are measuring neuron synapses, We are measuring all of that. Yes, it absolutely could be.

Is basically just a slow decay, right, Yes, yes, that would make sense then.

So I didn't I mean, I've never thought that the laws of thermodynamics, as far as decay goes an entropy could play into I mean, yes, I understand the human body decays, right the right. A person's body at ninety five is not operating at such a high level as somebody who's twenty eight, Like I understand that. I didn't think that we were necessarily talking about entropy at that time, but I guess by any other definition, sure.

All right, but if we actually prove, even by a quantum level, that these field interactions are happening, that very well could be a realistic future that we see because we were talking about at the very very very small level. Because I mean, you gotta remember, your brain is just made up of atoms, it's just made up of energy.

I mean, yeah, again, it's kind of oversimplifying it, but yes, it is nothing more than a organ that is reacting off of electrical impulses and chemical components.

Like based off of field interactions. Okay, fair talking about the smallest level of what's actually going on.

But then everybody's different, right, everybody's brain chemical makeup is different. That's why you have so many people on any depressants because they have medically, well I'm not going to say so many. I feel like a lot of those people on any depressants probably shouldn't be on them. But you have some people that have like actual chemical imbalances that have happened naturally and they have to take outside sources

Them or not?

Right?

And I mean.

I think it goes beyond I don't know, I feel like you're watering it down little too much. They're Jacob, you if stars will affect them? These these stars are not just fucking rogue planets out there that are just hanging around. I mean, they're essentially fucking energetic fields that are projecting their energy onto the Earth and onto the individual as much as the sun is sure.

Yeah, absolutely, the sun has a direct impact on you.

Yes, right, I mean that's also measurable, but not to the level that people have taken it. To say that Leo being on the horizon on this morning makes you have a certain personality trait because it was our birth, I think that that's a bit of a drastic assumption.

Right, I'm saying it'll probably have a live effect, not that because you were born at a certain time, that'll be your personality that's based off of your environment, because these are the these are the more dominant field interactions.

That's all I'm saying. It's like, Yeah, to say that it has a effect, that's like saying that, uh, you know, when we had that planetary alignment a couple of years ago, we had wreck high tidle waves. Therese were stars that were playing an effect on our physical world just based off of gravity sling shotting off of each other. And to say that that had some sort of an effect on our human bodies, even if it was a small

I mean, anybody doing anything as an excuse is never justifiable, right right, So yeah, I mean I agree somebody's like, oh, well, you know one a scorre pio.

It's like I don't give a fuck. You know, it's like figuring.

Out that's not the dominant effect on your life exactly.

And like you said with the Goggins example, yeah, there's outside forces affecting all of us, right, but there are certain people that just don't really deal with the bullshit or excuses and still got to get shited done today,

Yeah, anytime you're using it as a crutch or something against you, I think that that's probably looking at it the entirely wrong way. I think that if you can use it for the benefit that you should be using it for, then use it. You know, like you if you believe that whenever there's an ascendant libra or whatever.

The fuck.

I don't even understand fully understand astrology. But whenever you believe that and you think that it's actually going to help you for today.

Maybe it's placebo, maybe it's real fucking go with it.

Not fair enough.

I mean, yeah, I'm not saying that I'm putting all my eggs in the basket of astrology.

I think it's fascinating.

I don't understand it fully well enough to be able to, you know, rightfully comprehended, probably to the to the level that you know it requires.

But but yeah, I think.

I'm not saying that it is going to set your mood for the entire day, but it could definitely push you over the edge.

Okay, push you over the edge as far as like a psychotic break.

I mean, depending on what state you're in.

Yeah, okay, that's fair.

I mean, you could either just you know, get pushed over that edge and say like I'm just chucking this day up as just a shitty day, or you might just have a total meltdown, depends on where you're at.

Okay, fair enough, They're just subtle energies, that's the way you gotta look at them, Just subtle energies. Maybe you pick up on them, maybe it doesn't have any effect on you. But yeah, I don't know. Everybody has emotions. I mean we all we all go through the highs and lows of emotions thousands of times per day, and so to say that there wouldn't be any cause and effect from the stars is like.

Yeah, that's what honestly as of right now. So looking at uh, for example, Danny Goehler's experiments that he's doing, right, I can based off of the refracted laser that they're using. I do need to get some more information about the DMT, but I can actually predict exactly what symbols that they are going to be seeing.

Really yes, because there seems to be a repetitive nature to the symbols that are being seen. It's not like every time he looks into the laser he sees something new, if anything. He explains it like it's like a matrix and it's almost like a alphabet of hieroglyphs that we in our American English have not seen before, but something that you can write down and that somebody else doing the exact same experiment could see the exact same hieroglyphs.

What symbols, because the thing is, I there is actually something going wrong there because in this theory, you have to understand that light and sound are very similar, but sound is a mechanical part of light, so like sound can't do everything like can because it has to have a medium, right, which light just is just uh scalar interactions.

Yeah, because especially these days because of the fentanyl and shit.

But aside from that, but you don't want somebody that is, like, you know, in a bad mood or just a horrible person in general to make your DMT that is actually because they put a impression on the coherence of that substance. So yes, it could one hundred percent make you either have a bad experience or it could make you have a reduced experience. So, because sound and light are very similar,

But how do we know that these symbols are not that?

Because they should be whole, they shouldn't be fractured like they are.

What do you mean by fractured?

So the symbols that he's seeing like have you have you looked on him, like actually looked at him online and all that, So they should be full blown cimatics like actual like three yes, and actually more similar to sacred geometry type stuff than just symbols themselves.

Well, maybe what he's looking at is is much bigger and he's only looking like zoomed in, you know, to a smaller piece.

And it could that as well. Or it could be just maybe the frequency of the laser, I mean, even though it is red, maybe it needs to be just

Wow.

Yeah, Well look, look you need to keep on digging, sir, because I feel like you're on one yeah, and that I don't even fully comprehend what you're on but I believe that you're on one.

I felt like I kept up with a good bit of it, but then you got to a point where it started going way over my head and I'm like, shit, I'm trying to keep up here with fuck.

And I for the most part knew that this was going to be a dry like introduction of this. We haven't got to the cool parts of this, to the parts that are very interesting, that are very fun. For example, do you remember in the live whenever we were talking about UFOs and how they move in the manner that they do. Yeah, this is easily done by the nulls, the coherence nulls, because you got to think even inside

I want to get my buddy, who is a well he's in the process of becoming a physicist as we speak. I would love to get him on the show with you, so y'all could chop it up and he maybe he could do a better Like I'm trying to draw comparisons to something that everybody can resonate with this, but I feel like I did a horrible job this episode. I want to get him to kind of bounce ideas back and forth with you and see what he thinks of all this. I'm going to get you back on. I might.

Yeah, we'll see. Uh, we'll see where we get to that point or where I'm at at that point, because we got some things lined up, like I'm gonna be talking to Crow here soon. For example, what he is seeing is stuff that I directly predict, what he's seeing with the sun, what he is seeing with the moon, all of that.

Wow, Crows demand. I can't wait for you to have that conversation.

Luke.

Where are they gonna be able to find this information? We're gonna have it down in the show notes, the link to so that they can go through this document.

I will send you all like wherever I end up actually posting it at where they can actually reach me is all capital d et and then all lowercase theory at proton dot me. I know it says theory twice. I didn't think about that until the end.

But whatever be like that very well. We will put that down to the show notes and Luke, I think you came here and you you blew my mind to smithereens, and I'm just I'm gonna try and piece it all back together. But I think that you're really onto something, dude, and I appreciate the work that you're doing, and uh, dude, keep on doing it.

Absolutely, I'm gonna I'm gonna try to. Like I said, we're gonna get into the more fun things soon. I just I knew it was going to be dry, but that's how it is in the beginning.

Heard that that's how it is.

So, as I had said earlier, if you guys want to be able to come and check us out on Patreon, that link is going to be down on the show notes below. But we do have a couple of other ways that you might be able to support us and yourself.

Indeed, if you would like to support your own financial future and freedom, the best way to get your start in the buying, selling, and trading of gold and silver bullion would be to go to the link in the description below, cocsilver dot com. When you fill out your information, our homeboy Wayne Clark is going to be the one to reach back out to you and get you squared

And with that being said, this was another beautiful episode of the Cult of Conspiracy. And my name's Jonathan, well Jacob, and there's one very important, extremely vital piece of information where we need you to learn just as soon as humanly possible.

Oh hey, cult members, Jacob here just want to ask who wants better sex? The best way to get started is to go to Adam and Eve dot com right now. Adam Eve is offering fifty percent off just about any item, but that's not all. When you get one item, they will also send three bonus sexy items and six free movies. They offered a screet shipping as your privacy is a priority. Plus free shipping on your entire order doesn't matter how much you spend or what you buy. All we packaged