#1017- Is Epstein The Godfather Of AI?

and things where they're using you know, food references. I didn't realize that all the wealthy elites of the world were like serious beef jerky enthusiasts who fucking guessed that cause who fucking knew? But whatever. Right, So all the things combined, all the things put together here, there's another one that is coming to light as of right now. That honestly, and we kind of talked about it in

passing Raven Lee. You and I have never been shy about the fact that we do not fuck with nor do we trust AI.

meta stuff, which is interesting, that's incorrect too. Or it gives you, like a certain narrative or like a certain direction to push you in instead of giving you, like all the information all at once, which I find to be really interesting. How can an AI robot have a bias when it gives you certain information? But that was not all topics either.

all the stuff, no problems, no things whatsoever. I was looking for an image of vaccines cause miscarriages, and all of a sudden, this thing that's been making these images for me now started talking back and giving me an opinion that I didn't fucking ask for, and said that it couldn't do it because of this, that.

it wouldn't do the Clintons. I tried to do it with Obama and Trump and Bush and it was like, Nope, we are not doing this.

But it's definitely interesting for this one.

I'm calling bullshit on that. But fine, fine, because he hadn't been a convicted pedophile just yet, right, he hadn't been caught it with any of this stuff out in

the public just yet. However, when you're telling me you're inviting hundreds of top tier people to your island for a common sentence symposium, and you're telling me that there was not children walking around or teenagers that are way too young to be there walking around and just nobody noticed, I'm having a real real hard time swallowing that pill. I'm gonna be honest with you.

expansion of human consciousness and innovation. And so I don't think that he's going to display all of his shit. Now what did he have on the walls? Who knows what kind of a weird artwork maybe was out. I'm sure it was strategic in how he had this entire thing set up to get these people in bed with him.

But all right, put down the back burner for just a second, because in two thousand and two, when they were talking about what we're gonna do with AI to make it have common sense, human common sense, take that to the side for just a second. Ravenly, you've been around the block a time or two. Did you ever have a MySpace?

I had one. I just didn't really care about it.

It was really fucking cool. Right, all of this to say, objectively, MySpace was way better than Facebook, like hands down, And I'm not I understand that they tried. MySpace really tried to have like a comeback story there. Hel mac Miller got sponsored by them for a second. There was a whole it was. It was an attempt. But I'm sorry the reason why MySpace went by the wayside and why Facebook,

out of nowhere skyrocketed and everybody was on it. Even after MySpace got really wealthy investors to try to revitalize it and retool it, the entire Internet laughed and was like, sorry, homie, nope, we're on Facebook. We don't care about my Space. That's because they didn't have government behind them, they didn't have DARPA behind them.

two thousand and four. Do you happen to know off the top of your head what massive social media platform started February fourth, two thousand and four to replace DARPA's lifelog Facebook?

a couple of tiers for entry. When you go to that five dollars a month tier, you will get to see these shows absolutely cool.

down and pretty much go over it. And we're gonna go over the conspiracies talked in it and all the different points and we're just gonna, you know, break down the book and talk about this the person actually wrote it and his other work as well, because a lot of his other work is really interesting too. Because the book is shorter, so we will probably cover that as well. So come join us.

to AI. That led to the social media, which led to Edwards Nod, which led to Peter Teel, which led to the TikTok buyout, which led to the world as we know it today. Are you ready, Raven Lee?

like an affiliate of DARPA. And basically they make really cool James Bond esque tech, the things that only exist on TV and movies. These little gadgets are able to do wild shit, or some computer program that's able to do this stuff. The Iron Man shit really and truly is DARPA.

a spy. And they have like a lot of interesting tech in that movie that I would some of it I think is actually real tech that they have, not all of it, but some of it. It's really interesting.

discussing that this took place. You could see Will's whole soul getting crushed because whether he knew about it before the conversation or not, the fact that this is going out to the world and there's nothing he knows.

Soviets launch of Sputnik in fifty seven. So, the Russians send up a satellite and Eisenhower's first response is, look, we need some really cool spy tech to just do the wildest all the shit that like is on some third grader's imagination desk in his notebook. We need that in real life. And then there's these psychopaths within the government agencies just doing a rail of cocaine and be like, yes, sir, mister President, what you need and like, there's no idea

that's dumb. Basically, there's no idea that's too dumb for these people.

better techniques in order to do so right. According to its bid solicitation pamphlet in two thousand and three, it was to be an ontology based subsystem that captures, stores, and makes accessible the flow of one's persons, of one person's experiences in and interactions with the world, in order to support a broad spectrum of associates, assistance and other system capabilities. All right on, that's a big way of

saying this. They basically wanted to be able to see what a person's day to day life looked like in all things. Who do they interact with, what do they do, what kind of music do they listen to? What kind of things do they watch on TV? What kind of food are they eating? They wanted to get a good snapshot of somebody, and not just any somebody, all the somebody's So the objective of.

relationships end quote. And it has the ability to quote take in all of a subject's experience, from phone numbers dialed and email messages viewed to every breath taken, step made and place gone in quote.

relationship a person engages in. This was to include credit card purchases, websites, visited the content of telephone calls and emails sent and received, scans of faxes and postal mail sent and received, instant messages sent and received, books and magazines, read, television and radio selections, physical location recorded via wearable GPS sensors. Biomedical data captured through wearable sensors. The high level goal of this data logging was to identify quote preferences, plans, goals,

and other markers of intentionality. Intentionality is a very big keyword here. Here's the deal. The Patriot Act had just got signed into law. Basically, nine to eleven took place. Cool, cool, and we already know nine to eleven was an inside job.

But for the conversation, we're going off of what the American public was really like on mass believing at this time, right, and so what we had a terrorist attack happened, we gotta find if there's gonna be sleeper cells that are gonna just get a call to arms and start a global into fauda in America. We need our government to

make sure that we are safe over here. George Bush signs into law the Patriot Act, which gave any three letter agency and even in including your local police department, the ability to spy on you without giving you any heads up that this is what they're doing. Right. They don't have to tell you that they're giving that they're trailing you. They won't have to tell you that your phone is being tapped, they don't have to tell you

that they're monitoring everything. It's not required because it's for public safety.

your data to monitor this person. You want to know where this person works, where they where do they go to eat, what are the conversations of their phone calls, how often do they meet up with other clan members?

Because they are a listed domestic terrorist group. So okay, fine, And even if you're not going to take an action against the group, you want to be in the loop in case they start talking about doing some sort of a mass act of violence, you want to be ahead of it or at least decide if you're going to let it go through to fruition or not essentially reality. But okay, fine, who can argue with that, Right, you're stopping the Klan from doing some sort of a burning

of something or you know, violence against somebody. Ay, cool, good things, but it doesn't just stop there. They're wanted to see who was potentially going to become a political dissident, whether they already were or not, because there's certain key markers that they are looking for to be like, hey, that's a red flag. And while that red flag may not be a red flag today, the ramifications of that ten years from now might become.

I mean the Apple watches, they consistently track everything about you all day long, and it's reporting back, it's feeding back the algorithm non stop. It shows how many times, how many steps you take, what you're doing, It shows who's incoming and outgoing calls and it shows your heart rate, it shows all that, shows your sleep pattern, I mean, it shows everything about you. Because a lot of people

really don't take theirs off much. I mean they take them off to charge, but for the most part, a lot of people where there's twenty four to seven if they can, which is able, which I'm sure soon they're going to have the next gen model is going to be like, well, why don't you just get it in your risk because that's the whole thing with Bill Gates right now, is to put it in your wrist, the little chip thing to where you have your whole iPhone in your wrist, so like now you don't need to

be wearing the watch all the time. It's you know, super bulky and inconvenient.

for example, is a really good one. So Christmas ads from the early two thousands till now, if you actually go back and you read them, and you look at them and you look at the how much of actual sales differences and the way that they are marketing it

and what they were showing, it's actually really interesting. So they've been changing it and making it different to fit the masses, to be able to manipulate them more and more and more, and then you get today, people are still buying Black Friday things, even though Black Friday, really we know for a fact, isn't a good time to buy things, which, by the way, anybody that's actually wanting to buy stuff, you should really buy it. In the months between March and April is when things are the

most on sale. Realistically, the big sale in July, the precursor sale, the Black Friday in July, Actually you'll get better sales than you will later on in the year. That's totally side tangent of things. But that gets back to this whole tracking situation.

the fuck cares what your food looks like. That's ridiculous. Now. I'm not talking about like travel vloggers who are showing this really nice restaurant. They're showing like what these things look like. I'm talking about like you're going to Chili's. I don't need to know what you ordered at Chili's a week ago. What are we talking about here? But I'm getting ahead of myself. I'm actually getting like years ahead of myself here. Let's let's break this down, so

slow down, getting back to it. Another of DARPA's goals for Lifelog had a predictive function. It sought to quote find meaningful patterns in the timeline to infer the user's routine, habits and relationships with other people. Organizations, places, and objects, and to exploit these patterns to ease its task end quote. So not only was lifelog trying to collect data about a human being, it was confirmed by its own emission, trying to get a predictive function about it, trying to

see what they're going to do next. Generically, the term lifelog or flog. Oddly enough, Lifelog's nickname was flog like a whip.

see here, read, say, and touch. The media was talking about this. News articles are talking about this. Fox and CNN had made a mention of it and making it sound cool. It's the diary to end all diaries. That's fucking terrifying, doc. Why are you trying to throw that in some sort of a cool hip way.

in a moment. Anyway. The Lifelog program was canceled February fourth, two thousand and four, after criticism concerning the privacy implications of the system. Because this is a massive invasion of privacy. We can't have this. This is crazy, this is massive government overreach. Raven. Well, keep all of that in mind.

That same day, February fourth, two thousand and four, is the day that this hoodied wearing, curly head, weird beaker looking motherfucker names Mark Zuckerberg launched this website called the Facebook, and it started off I guess relatively, you know what it was. It was supposed to be only Harvard students, and within the first like six months, half of the users on Facebook or the Facebook at the time were all Harvard students. And it also was a stalker's fucking

wet dream. The had these girls that were posting their entire class schedules and so like, if you were a dude or somebody not even a dude, just a person with ill intent that wanted to know where this person was going to be at a certain time, it was on their Facebook.

this is how we like. They were posting like where parties were with like the you know, the GPS location on them and stuff. And I didn't really like, honestly, pay much mind to it because I wasn't in college, so I was like, whatever the fuck that is? But I remember hearing about it, and I didn't, you know,

I didn't really know much about it. I actually didn't even get a Facebook until like my second year in the Marine Corps because everybody was like, you need to get one, because I didn't, you know, I didn't really get to communicate with my family that often, so I was like, I guess.

of this. We are talking two thousand and five. I had a Facebook page as a middle schooler.

bubble life at that point. And my middle school ass had a Facebook in six you see what I'm saying. It took two years for this thing for only college kids to trickle down from oh, it's only college kids for Harvard and all this to trickle down into middle school Louisiana zeitgeist two years. So when everybody says, oh, it was never intended for that bull fucking shit, well, they had an age restriction with nothing to back it up. You could put whatever date you wanted, is your birthday?

Nobody it didn't. There was nothing to check you on that.

So yeah, like I didn't. Uh, And then here's a little admission that everyone's gonna maybe like have a whole crash out about, you know, like those mpth three players or like the Apple ones what are they called? One that you can get iPods. So I got gifted my iPods and like other people put music on them. Still to this day, I'd have zero idea how to put music on an iPod or an MP theory player.

CD I had I have. I actually have it. To be honest with you, I have a large CD. So's that's about the extent of my technology when it comes to stuff. And what's funny is I went into calm and then had to learn a bunch about technology, and I was like, man, how the fuck did I have? But that actually, to me was a lot more interesting because of how the satellites work and how like they can ping each other and there's like a lot more complications with it. I just vote for like normal stuff.

I'm gonna be honest with you, Like, I'm pretty old school. I like my books. I like to be able to touch my books. I'm weird like that, So.

Peter Teel. He came in. Oh yes, but keep in mind we're talking four Most people on Earth had no idea who the fuck this guy was. No one knew who Mark Zuckerberg was. Very few people even knew exactly. Very few people knew who Elon Musk was. Bill Gates was the tech guy. He was the name that people knew about. Keep in mind, do you remember AOL instant messenger?

this clip right now from this from this movie. It's only forty five seconds long. And this is Peter Teal's, you know, impersonation. What's the word I want to look for his character on the movie. I'll check it out, Sean, He'll be right with you.

You would have a person track another person, right, not necessarily spy versus spy, but like, let's say that you, Raven Lee, became a person of interest to a three letter agency for whatever reason, right, they would have to assign an agent to track you and watch your movements, check your bank accounts, do all these things, do all this, Where are you going, what objects are you buying? Whatever

the case. That took time, that took resources, that took energy, and believe it or not, the CIA doesn't have five million people that are working for it just sitting around waiting for a task to obsessively consume them. So it was very slow going, and the data was getting input, but not at the rate that it needed to the government needed to get the public to give over that data enter the Facebook, Peter TiO being one of the

biggest investors at that time. Pretty much now it was like a cool and trendy thing to upload your class schedule, your hopes, your dreams, little things you thought were important. What restaurants you attend, right, what parties you go to, people within your network, friends of yours, where you work. All of this was now something that people wanted for.

It's crazy to me still out loud. People wanted this information on the internet forever, to be a part of it, to be cool because somehow people really care about you into this level of things and like that's a thing. It gave everybody the whole memi me situation. Everybody felt like they were suffering from main character syndrome, and in a way they were. Meanwhile, the government was taking all of that data and putting it into a computer system, and no longer do we need to assign an agent

for a person. We needed a couple of people to monitor Facebook's data bank. And that was about it.

them and those kind of things. Now you have complete strangers or people that you kind of know that are giving you likes, comments, shares, you know, whatever, and now it's making you feel good. It's a little dopamine hit every single time. Yeah, it's quite ingenious, honestly it is.

his mind of like these now. I don't know how long the dark web platforms have been around, but I could see how that would be able to spark the idea of people getting together and chatting about their daily lives and all of these things, because I mean that's people used to pinpal each other information from across the globe, you know, other readers or writers or researchers would send it back and forth. I don't know, I'm just thinking out loud as I'm thinking about, like, how did he

come up with this? How did this idea even like actually spark versus what like you know, I know, he made a movie about himself or whatever. I don't think he's actually gonna tell us realistically how he figured it all it all out?

shook out. But it again, there's some creative liberties that are taken. Your boy Sean in the background played by Justin Tayake. His role is made way larger in the movie than it actually was in real life. So it's the movie was made for entertainment, but it got kind of the key details close enough. But as far as this portion goes, Peter Tiel absolutely was the angel investor that made Facebook what it became. He did the same thing,

by the way, with a guy named Reed Hoffman. Maybe you've heard of him because he's also in the Epstein Files, but he is the creator and founder of LinkedIn. So again, the Internet and by the Internet for this of for all intents and purposes on this when I am just meaning the government, right, they not only saw on Facebook what you found to be socially cool and what made

you tick. There they could track your entire employment history, They could track your all of your resumes and updates and all the things, and then find your professional network as well as your social network, as well as your eating network, as far as your banking goes. Because yes, Hay Powell was a part of this too, so is Vinmo, so is cash App, so all of these things the government and by for this record, Peter Teele was an angel investor in all these things, if not the co

creator of it. And so the database got everything it needed from every single person, whether they ever realized that they were handing over this information or not.

for AI. The next step in AI, I think it's interesting that nobody really talks about him. I mean, he was messing what like over two thousand times in the Epstein files, like two thousand, six hundred or four hundred or something like that time raising. Yeah, but no one's really chatting about him and his role and how our society is today and how he used DARPA or he was an agent for DARPA. I'm not really sure how DARPA and him are best buds, but they are like hand in hand.

and that's what it was about. It was it would understand that an apple grows from a tree. Okay, cool, But if you were to try to tell it to pull an apple pie out of an oven at a certain point, not based off of a timer, but off of the site and off of the smell and off of these, it didn't understand common sense. It understood very very basic pattern recognition that you had to painstakingly put

into databases. Right. This is why the Common Sense Symposium of two thousand and two took place at Little Saint James, specifically because they were trying to talk about how to make AI have human common sense. This is why Pallenteer got used in the way that it did. So now we're gonna talk about this. This article here is from Get Loud with a med Pallenteer financed by Epstein, fueled by killing in Gaza and spying on you. Yeah, this is gonna be a weird article, and I think it's

it's really important for us to really dig into. So Palenteer took Epstein's money, teals backing and Trump's blessing to build an AI war machine. If Gaza is the testing ground America's next and are we ready to fight back? So we can talk about the Gaza situation a little bit if we want to, But for this let's just stick to the main talking points here right watching Musk and Trump, Cosey's relationship collapse between the public meltdown. This

article was written last year. By the way, I can't help but notice who's quietly smiling Trump's bedfellow, Pallenteer, a data behemoth born in Cia Coffers now peddling itself to Israel's war machine and carrying the taint of Epstein's filthy millions. Pallenteer which helped draw up the kill lists for Gaza, which is very accurate, by the way, lists responsible for the murder of tens of thousands of Palestinians, the vast majority of whom are women and children, was bankrolled in

part by convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. That wasn't in part. That was a very large endowment to get that started, But we'll get to that today. That same code driven engine is giving Trump the ability to assemble a mega AI database of every single American's secrets. So also on screen right now is a logo, a newspaper clipping that says very big, bold words Pallenteer stands with Israel. Yes soccer. There's a photograph from a full page ad purchased by

a Palenteer in the New York Times. So all right, let's continue on here. Built to extract or excuse me, Built to extract insights from torrents of data. With machine learning and AI, Palenteers optimizing manufacturing and supply chains, but also optimizing genocide and kill chains. The big data giant was born out of a desire to do what was illegal. In two thousand and three, the CIA couldn't legally spy the way it wanted to, so it outsourced the job.

The CIA became Palenteer's first and only investor, for years, quietly bankrolling a private surveillance empire it couldn't build itself. A decade later, Edward Snowden exposed the truth. Palaenteer had been helping the US government condust mass illegal spying, not on foreign threats, but on its own citizens. Now this same company, with roots and secrecy, war and surveillance, is

partnering with Israel, powering a genocidal war in Gaza. What started as an illegal surveillance has evolved into algorithmic warfare. And Palestine is the most brutal testing ground. Yes, of course, today Palanteer's algorithms are built to kill Palestinian civilians in Gaza. These aren't random horrors of war. They are the direct result of lines of code designed to label Palestinian lives as targets, reducing human beings to data points designed for obliteration.

Paladeer doesn't hide what it is. It brags about it. The CEO, Alex Karp, proudly cause the company's surveillance infrastructure a quote digital kill chain.

You know that, just like there is different types of Muslims. Not all Muslims are completely evil. There is sectors that are way horrific compared to the other ones.

there is literal sectors of these groups. I don't believe that all Jewish people are evil, no, but I do believe that Israel is behind a lot more things that they have their hand in the cookie jar, a lot more than what has been led on to believe in that this whole connection with Jeffrey Epstein's showing how many threads to Israel, there is is a clear indication that, like the writing is on the wall, that they are

way worse off than what a lot of people. I've been pretty quiet about my opinion about Israel this whole time, but that's where I'm at with it.

So whenever I say Israel, I mean Mussad, I mean Net and Yahoo, I mean his cabinet, I mean very top tier people. I don't believe that people in Israel are evil people. I do not believe that. And that's the other thing too, I don't believe in using the term Jews and Israel interchangeably. That seems to be a thing that people love doing when we say in Israel, well, you know, it's not all the Jews, like, no, no, no, there's Jews in America. They ain't got shit or fuck

to do with what's going on in Israel. I am talking about Net and Yahoo and his ILK. I am not talking about people in the world that happen to be of Jewish faith or of Jewish blood. We're talking about two different things here. And yes, I still think that the nation of Israel needs to exist as a country. I hate the way it's being ran right now, but I believe that it deserves the right to exist. I

believe Russia should be a nation. I can't stand the fucking president of it, and I think he's a psychopath that needs to be taken out but I don't believe that, right, No, I don't. I think he's out of his fucking mind. But my point is I'm not blaming every citizen in Moscow for Putin ship. Does this make sense?

say more forced than anything. You know, it's it's one of those things of that that's their problems, that's them problem in America has a lot of our problems. So I don't want people and I don't want people to die for no specific reasons. I mean, that's absolutely tos like we could all been together and kill all the Taliban.

I'm here for that. But yeah, no, I hear what you're saying, and I think there needs to be very clear distinctions when people are talking about different groups and when they're bringing these points up, and that a lot of people believe that Jeffrey Epstein is in fact alive in Israel. I've seen the well we don't know if their AI images or not. The circulating photos that do appear to be him with long hair. I just find

very convenient. I just want everybody to really like sit with it for a second and understand, here are the files that dropped, here's all the information that came with it, all the ties are being shown to Israel. And then conveniently, after several years, just suddenly we have photos of Epstein alive in Israel, just weirdly coincidental, a few weeks after this entire whole thing happened, and people are starting to

actually get called out on their shit it. You know, I would just wager that coincidences aren't that strong in life.

call myself a Zionist quote unquote. I do not mean the ultra Zionists that believe that Israel have some sort of a moral high ground or they're better than anybody. I mean that in the traditional term of saying that I believe Israel should exis as a nation the same way whenever I claim that I am a feminist. I believe that women should get paid the same as a man for the same work that they are doing. I

believe that our votes should count in equal ways. I don't mean the fucking psycholibtards that are screaming with pussy hats on their heads right These terms are being used in different ways right now.

already woven into the darkest corners of power. In two thousand and five, Jeffrey Epstein funneled forty million dollars into Peter Teal's pocket, seating the very startup that would become Palenteer. And Teal has never fully disavowed that relationship and has even has he he insisted Epstein quote had absolutely nothing to do with Israel. I don't know why this article is working very hard to shove the Israel narrative towards the story of Palenteer. But fine, whatever the point we

need to take from that is a five. Jeffrey Epstein funneled forty million dollars to start up Pallenteer. So again we're not talking about oh, well, you know Epstein and they just ran in similar circles. No, the same way that Peter Teele is plugged with Facebook, Epstein is plugged with Palenteer. So now all of Palenteer's affiliations all stem from Epstein either way you go. And even in five yeah,

he wasn't convicted at that time. Everybody that spent any amount of time with this dude knew what was up. Allegedly him and Trump had their big falling out No. Four or something whatever. Anyway, a couple of random little things that we could bring up. At this time, Jeffrey Epstein introduced Kimball Musk, Elon Musk's brother to a woman

in his entourage, two sources told Business Insider. The woman, who had previously dated Epstein and lived in an apartment building where he was known to house models, dated Kimball from twenty eleven to twenty twelve.

He's mentioned many times in the emails as being one of the top dogs in his thing. And they talk about his eye clutor, they talk about, you know, these email lists were utilizing the data for potential candidates to take their genome sequencing. Yeah, and Musk has mentioned quite a few times.

with this that I had even no idea. You can't honest look at this and be like, you know, Gates and Elon and Zuckerberg are all homies pushing forward with this AI shit down your throat, and then just happens to be all of them have heavy ties to Epstein, and Elon wasn't somehow involved, at least in the sense of maybe I just I don't know if Elon would take money from him, but they're definitely I think he was using the data collection in which Epstein was gathering.

That's where I think that would be the money maker.

with authority that Elon never went to the Island. I'm saying as of this moment, with the research I've done up until this point, and I have not read every single email and file, but from what I could tell, I don't the Elon ever went to the island for the purposes of partying with the children. Did he do that in Manhattan? Probably?

But I mean, he's just one. I mean he is he is one of the richest people in the world. So he's one of the biggest key components. When it is when you are talking about Epstein and you are talking about these sectors, him, Gates, Zuckerberg, Teal, Epstein, and then all the other scientists involved are the people that we are going to be continuously bringing up because I know people are like you guys have a heart on

for these people. Look, all I'm saying is is that we can't talk about these sectors where they've dominated all the research, and they've taken every person that has any kind of brilliant idea, they have brought them into the fold. At this point, we have to talk about these people

because they've literally monopolized everything. So when it comes to AI, when it comes to genetic sequencing, when it comes to trying to create superhumans, trying to push us forward into space, human consciousness, all of these different types of factors, these names are going to be the biggest ones in this game. And I feel like there's other ones we just don't actually know about, the silent investors and who else is in the fold when it comes to this.

over constitutional safeguards. In March of twenty twenty five, Pallunteer secured a thirty million dollar contract with ICE to quote monitor undocumented immigrants end.

for almost anything. Alex krps On a apologetic cheerleader for Western militarism. His snide takes on quote unquote wokeness, which, let's be real, wokeness does suck, and his dismissal of Silicon Valley distractions have charmed a growing course of hawks and technocrats. Meanwhile, the Pentagon has been massively scaling up its investment into artificial intelligence, in a move that underscores just how central AI is becoming to the US military strategy.

The Defense Department quietly expanded its contract with Palenteer, boosting the ceiling for the company's Maven smart system to nearly one point three billion dollars through twenty twenty nine. So they already wrote the check for that, and they have projections of how much and how further they wanted to go for the next at least.

and tracking objects of interest in real time. Pallenteer snapped up the contract only after Google, panicked by employee walkouts, washed its hands of the project back in twenty eighteen. So Google had this contract right. That's why, for instance, a lot of the people that were deployed were essentially using Google Earth, a more refined version of it, a

more top secret security clearance version of Google Earth. But that's what they were using to get data as far as the where the bad guys were where the good guys were all these things. Pallenteers snatched that up the second Google walked away from it. So today or as a time recording twenty twenty five, Maven is already driving surveillance and targeting over Ukraine and accelerating US strikes on

Hooty rocket launchers around the Red Sea. Tasks that once demanded two thousand analysis and in two thous thousand and three now require a skeleton crew of just twenty because ai dozen seconds what used to take many people working for many days to do.

reshape research processes that will take years. It's talking about extending laboratory security protocols, next generation technology tied with local and governmental impact, and so it goes into a lot more things, but pretty much Trump is trying to win

the AI race, the supercomputer race. But it's interesting as we're talking about this and how Google lost this contract and then Teal's company took over, and then this whole thing with the Data company and its databased AI collection thing that's actually gathering collection information and then utilizing it to try to find the best research and best weapons and best dot dot dot. So I think it all ties in with each other, one.

You will see on screen right now, some top Israeli officials and your boy Peter Thiel right now.

or dissidents here at home as threats. Again, you could tell the political leanings of the person who wrote this article, but please just understand it could target anyone.

about today. So rising resistance, despite the terror these systems have unleashed, Palestinians and their allies are refusing to be silent. At the Hill and Valley Forum in Washington, DC earlier this spring, a Palestinian American activist named Sumer Mura Bach storm the stage during palentteer CEO Alex Karp's keynotes, shouting, you are getting wealthy off killing Palestinians, you are killing

my family and palace time. Video of her courageous interruption quickly went viral, drawing hundreds of thousands of views on TikTok and sparking coverage across major outlets. I bet you'd have a hard time finding that now that Oracle has bought it out, well, you know whatever. As Karp stumbles to respond, calling her a product of Hamas and insisting his technology only kills terrorists. With the audience stunned, silence spoke volumes.

found in Qtel. Basically when the CIA lost because the CIA was the largest drug dealer in America for decades. That's that's not a joke, right, pretty much since the fifties, the CIA lost a lot of funding and they had to come up with a way to make money so they could still do the cool, sexy spy operations. So they started selling coke, they started selling heroin, they started

doing all of these things. And that's a that's not even a crazy conspiracy at this point, that's by their own emission, and allegedly the War on drugs ended that that's not true. The CIA is still the number one shipper of drugs into the country. To back that. If you've ever seen Made in America where your boy Tom Cruise plays Barry Seal as a pilot who is flying in cocaine for the CIA, all of that was a.

for clandestine operations. Over the past decade, Gotham has quietly infiltrated local police fusion centers, ICE, investigative case management systems, and even the Secret Service, each integration shipping away at due process and privacy. Under the Trump administration, doze championed in part by Elon Musk's allies, Palenteer is now poised to merge social security, the IRS filings, custom and Border protection logs, DMV records, and more into a single AI

powered mega API at the Department of Homeland Security. As wireds May twenty twenty five, expose a detailed that master database will do a few things. Number one, fuse personal data. Link social Security numbers to IRS tax returns, CPB travel logs, driver's license photos, and prescription histories, creating a dossier on every individual's habits, associations, and political leanings. Number two, predict threat scores quote unquote, Oh yes, apply God to no.

I've we're both fucked. I be honest with you. Apply Gotham's predicted policy of policing algorithms to this unified database or data set, assigning each American a risk rating quote unquote, a behavioral index that can justify surveillance assets, seizures, or even pre emptim detention number three undermine oversight. In February of twenty twenty five, civil rights groups filed suits to block DOJ's access to IRS data, warning that this is

a breach of constitutional privacy protections. Yet the administration insists its aims is to simply root out fraud quote unquote, a convenient echo of the Israeli military's claim about minimizing collateral damage, even as it continues to mass.

local data into federal watch lists. Now, with Dooja's Mega API, the same AI that tagged a Gozantine as a combatant could tag a Muslim college student in Detroit as a potential extremist. There may be something there, but anyway, all

without judicial oversight. In April twenty twenty five, ACLU report warns that if pallenteers algorithms assign scores quote unquote based on car ownership or voting frequency, we risk a Chinese style social credit system, punishing dissent and chilling free speech under the guise of public safety.

Gotham by the way. Yeah, I was like, okay, Batman, a little Gotham city over here. This is a weird. It's definitely interesting that this is still actually being allowed to be used. But people though, I think people have come to a point where they just accept the data collection, because hell, even if you use the Walmart app for example, it tracks what you buy and if you buy it more than once, you literally have a list and it will just be like, do you want to just add

all this to your list? I mean, it's tracking every single thing. It's predicting everything that you're doing at this point. And the face I D thing that's become super easy to be able to use all your stuff, the tap to pay, like all of it is tracking everything that you're doing completely. So I think people have just kind of given up at this point and you're in any conveniency for your rights.

I don't know that for a fact. Just got a feeling, you know, I bet the person who wrote this article really wish is that Hillary Clinton would be president, right, Like I don't know this for a fact, just got a weird feeling.

the CIA with inq tel So continuing on here. So algorithms and data analytics can track disease outbreaks, forecast natural disasters, and optimize public health responses. But Palenteer's approach is built

on obfuscation. The company refuses to identify its government clients, hides its source code under non disclosure agreements, and invokes a corporate mantra of we can't comment, even as it pulled in over two point seven billion dollars in federal contracts since two thousand and nine, So it's from nine to twenty twenty five, This company that was just started four pulled in two point seven billion, big boy billions in government contracts alone, not to mention all the other

private equity groups that are using Pallentteer for their own purposes. This is not social media stuff, This is not any of the other This is strictly government contracts. Hey na, right, why not? Why not? All of a sudden, Oh, Peter Teele would never use this. He would never sell this to China. The fuck he wouldn't. Why wouldn't he? Why why wouldn't he? He would never use this with the Russians? Why not? I don't see why.

a little bit left. Let's see one struggle in future. So again, from Gaza's destroyed neighborhoods to American city centers bristling with surveillance cameras, Pallentteer is the prime example of

how data is weaponized against our collective humanity. When Palenteer crafts a kill liss for the IDF that slaughters Palaestinian mothers and children, and then turns that same AI towards US citizens, branding them extremists or threats to national security, a clear continuum emerges more technology that dehumanizes, marginalizes, and

ultimately erases dissent. That a company funded by Jeffrey Epstein's forty milli million dollar investment in Peter Teel, still unexplained for the record, has empowered by Trump to construct what he called the largest surveillance police state in American history is no coincidence.

for political ideations. It could be used towards gun owners, It could be used towards a certain tax bracket like I. Okay, the fight isn't against Israel Palenteer, It's against the political machine engineered for death, deception.

what was going on. Allegedly, right, totally bullshit. So now this is why Facebook beat MySpace because they had government funding, right, this is why. This is the same reason why Spotify got big, why Instagram got big, Peter Teal and DARPA, that's it. This is why certain social media platforms who or I should say that are made better and could do successfull just be great, they don't because they don't

have government funding or DARPA. And believe it or not, this is why certain things go viral and certain things don't. Certain things hit on what the government thinks is okay to go viral, certain things don't. It's crazy how it all really shakes out.

And it's like, if you really think about the data that they're collecting and the algorithm and how they're targeting people and utilizing all of this stuff, they're purpose swaying and pushing different narratives and things based on what the

top AI information data sequencing. They have to be able to hit different demographic draft demographic groups my lord, yeah, and to be able to shift and move the direction around, uh for what people are interested in and what people are going to continuously talk about, Go research, go look at it makes sense. I mean, I'm surprised that we are even allowed to put half the stuff on the Internet that we currently not just us When I say we, I'm talking about the American people that we can as

of right now. I do personally feel like we're going to be shifting into a situation where a lot of our things may or may not be allowed to be pushed. But I don't think that it's going to be reaching the masses that a lot of the people are you are used to because of the algorithms. But they had to be really sneaky about it, right because they don't want to alert the people that they're infringing on all

of their rights. They will trickle it down one little thing at a time to where you're just so n bothered by it. That's just like a mild inconvenience. So it's just like, yeah, okay, sure, like the iPhone updates, right, nobody really likes their phones being updated. And if you know, if you actually go in and read the updates, you have to like physically turn off a whole bunch of

tracking things in your phone itself. Because there is a bunch of stuff in the iPhone updates for the last six updates.

off all of my stuff. But most people aren't doing that, and so you're giving away literally anything in everything that is attached to you, to this database, to the to palatine, to all of these things that Peter Tiele and Epstein funded, made and created and push forward for the data collection of Now where we are at entering into with AI.

literally everything Epstein was a doing. And it wasn't even about Epstein. It was about others just like him, but it wasn't even about him. It's this is all because the algorithms, the data that is being collected by the government is pushing certain things to push a certain narrative.

The same reason why in the early nineties the government pulled in all of these young rap artists and said, hey, listen, we want you to really start leaning into the gangster rap thing, start talking about drugs and slapping hose and jail and all that. We want you to really start pushing that agenda way more heavy than you already are. And you know, if you do this, you're going to

see your sales skyrocket. We're going to change some certain rules to where radio stations will play you, obviously with the cuss words bleeped out, but like we're gonna start letting this go out to where anybody can hear this, and we're gonna make this deal happen. Right, And how Ice QB's even talked about how he was pulled into that meeting, and so it's this, This goes so much deeper than just what your Amazon shopping cart randomly suggested

for you. Right, This is this goes decades back, and it's going so far to where now it's and we've ran the experiment. Right, how many people have started talking about cat food around their phone when they don't own a cat, just to see how long it takes to start seeing ads and coupons for cat food start coming up.

And then on top of that, you're also brainwashing in a sense because if you hear it over and over again, there's songs that I probably haven't heard since I was a teenager that if they came on right now, I would know every single word. Yeah, exactly, but yet I can't remember, you know, something simple from a few days ago.

It's very intentional, it's very interesting, and the fact that Epstein and all of his little homies were super involved in that area as well, including all of this, like it all ties together, and it all ties to that summit that you're going to talk about too Big Time, and how that was one of the key components in how we've ended up here today.

of custody to this fucker. So let's backtrack, right, So we're talking about these things in three with DARPAH, four with Facebook, all of this, but in the spring of two thousand and two, So keep in mind September eleventh, it took place two thousand and one, a few not even six months raven not even six months after that, Jeffrey Epstein hosted a conference at his Island home for a quote unquote common Sense Symposium. When I say common sense symposium, let's talk about it. So this is an

article from the ACM Digital Library. It's an AI library, essentially the Saint Thomas Common Sense Symposium Designing Architectures for Human Level Intelligence Designing Architectures for Human level Intelligence in two thousand and two. So keep in mind AI existed well before this. This was to make AI more human. Let's read into it here. This is just the abstract

of it. To build a machine that has quote unquote common sense was once a principal goal in the field of artificial intelligence, but most researchers in recent years have retreated from that ambitious aim. Instead, each developed some special technique that could deal with some class of problem well

but does poorly at almost everything else. We are convinced, however, that no one such that no one such method will ever turn out to be quote unquote best, and that instead, the powerful AI systems of the future will use a diverse array of resources that together will deal with a

great range of problems. To build a machine that's resourceful enough to have human like common sense, we must develop ways to combine the advantage of multiple methods to represent knowledge, multiple ways to make inferences, and multiple ways to learn. We hailed a two day symposium in Saint Thomas, US Virgin Islands to discuss a project to develop a new art architectural schemes that can bridge between different strategies and representations.

This article reports on these events and ideas developed at the meeting, and subsequent thoughts by authors on how to make progress. So this symposium, and it's called the common Sense Conference or the common Sense Symposium. Excuse me, that took place at little Saint James, it says Saint Thomas, But that's very inaccurate. It was at Jeffrey Epstein's home, his island home with the temple, the whole thing. He brought in, all of these tech gurus, these AI experts,

and all this. Attendees included intellectual or I'm sorry, influential AI developers.

on the same page here. There's no doubts that he was clearly a registered sex offender after this point, and they still accepted seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars from him, Just so we're all on the same page, right, But that was just a MIT.

could look that up. That's not a joke. That didn't just know MIT on paper When they would refer to the money coming from Voldemort, it is because they knew that they couldn't put on paper that Jeffrey Epstein is the one that was sending them the money because he was a registered pedophile and sex offender, So they just referred to him as Voldemort even at the labs.

let's get into it here. So this is the guy his all Novak And then again, this isn't even mentioning the fact that the president of Harvard was a frequent flyer to Epstein Island and has been removed from his position until they can get to the bottom of how deep his ties went.

Martin Novak, a well known mathematical biologist. A well known mathematical biologist, appears more than four thousand times in the records released under the twenty twenty five Epstein Files Transparency Act. So who is this guy? Who's old? Martin Novak is an Australian born professor of math and biology at Harvard University, widely seen as a leader in evolutionary dynamics. Evolutionary dynamics these are very very very critical terms that I'm using

right now. We're going to get into more here in a bit, just so s'tre clear. His research explores how cooperation develops, as well as viral systems and cancer progression. A highly cited scholar, he has worked in positions at Oxford and the Institute for Advanced Study. At Harvard, he founded and ran the Program for Evolutionary Dynamics or PED. Now PED that is a program, Like I said, program for evolutionary dynamics. This is a very fancy political way

to say eugenics. Yes, there's no other way to say this. Evolutionary dynamics. So we are talking about manufacturing. Survival of the fit is to get the best results that you deem as the best results. It is. It is a very very very fancy way to say he founded and ran the program for eugenics at Harvard. That's it.

phenotypic phenotypic typic sorry change. Thus is different from population genetics and quantitative genetics that focuses on genetic change, and from population dynamics that describes change in population size over time, but it does not include genetic change. The other reference it says as evolutionary dynamics refers to the study of how populations evolve over time, influenced by various factors such

as reproductive competitiveness, and selection. This field combines my mathematical modeling with biological principles to understand the changes in traits and behaviors within populations. It encompasses the analysis of population dynamics, including how traits like the body size or forging strategies evolve in response to environmental pressures. So this eat and of itself is the mathematical equations of how populations can

evolve or be affected. This, encompassed with genome sequencing and other evolutionary things, can in fact be used for eugenics.

by outside factors. And so you're factoring in in a ratio mathematical way to see production levels, competitive levels, if there is if starvation happens, what are the traits that might change if there is a variant in air quality, water, food quality. How does that play into the genome? How does our DNA actually respond to it, and what traits evolve from it? Can behaviors of the population be tracked mathematically to determine what is coming next?

Major funding. In two thousand and three, Epstein provided a six point five million dollar gift to establish the eugenics I'm not gonna say ped I'm gonna say the eugenics at Harvard, which Novak led. This constituted the bulk of Epstein's nine point one million in donations to the university. So basically two thirds of all of Epstein's donations to

Harvard were specifically done for their eugenics lab. So Epstein kept a private office in the Eugenics building for almost ten years, visiting more than forty times between twenty ten and twenty eighteen, in spite of his sentence. Now the cryptic emails. The files include a twenty fourteen email exchange where Novak wrote to Epstein, our spy was captured after completing her mission. Epstein replied, did you torture her? The context remains unexplained. What spy, what mission? And why would

Epstein ask if she was tortured? Novak has not commented on this now they're personal ties. Correspondence shows Novak stayed at Epstein's New York apartment, thanked Jizlain Maxwell for amazing hospitality, and was planned beneficiary for a five million dollar bequest from Epstein just days before his death alleged death. Of course, now, private travel emails detail arrangements for Novak to and a companion to fly to Saint Thomas, near Epstein's private island,

in twenty twelve and twenty fourteen. So what was the impact on Novak's career at Harvard? In twenty twenty, Harvard's disciplinary action was taken on Novak after conducting an internal review of its Epstein ties. In twenty twenty one, Harvard placed Novak on paid administrative leave, barring or barred him from undergraduate supervision for two years, and permanently closed their eugenics lab. Their reinstatement, all sanctions were lifted in twenty

twenty three. Novak remains a tenured professor with joint appointment appointments rather in mathematics and organismic and evolutionary by so he got a two year slap on the wrist. He was paid the entire time, and now he's back to doing what he was doing beforehand, although allegedly their ped

lab aka Eugenics Lab was shut down. Not exactly right now, colleague. Defense, Some like Harvard law professor Lawrence Lessig, argued Novak was scapegoaded, claiming the administration encouraged your relationship to secure Epstein's funding. And I would agree with that, especially now that we know that Harvard's president was also tied in with Epstein. I got a hard time believing that the top brass at Harvard actually gave a fuck about this. They wanted that money too.

No Fact and Jeffrey Epstein were obsessed with the concept of reverse Darwinism. Does this term ring a bell to you?

remember my home number. I needed to remember my mom's work number. I needed to remember my mom's cell phone number, my dad's work number, my dad's selphone number, my school office. I had to remember all of these numbers in case something happened right now. I couldn't tell you, but maybe three or four phone numbers. Real shit, because we have relied more heavily on our phone book, in our cell phones than our own memory banks for this. And that's

a small example. That's a micro example, but let's take that to the macro. As much as humans rely on air conditioning, the theory as far as reverse Darwinism is we will become so bad at regulating our own body temperature in nature because we rely too heavily on heating and air conditioning to do so. For us, we rely so heavily on filtered water from our refrigerator that our stomach and our gut biome is weakened to where we

cannot handle harsher water. It goes to a lot of levels here, But your boy Novak and Epstein were both obsessed with reverse Darwinism, and their intentions as far as the eugenics conversation was to make the best top tier alpha dynamic human being species they possibly.

books a bit. Sure. Why not.

facility's director of the program. But Gross is the one that actually pushed forward, one of the individuals along with Jeffrey, who push forward the imaginative proposal for this program in and of itself. And then obviously the dean of the Facility of Arts and Science, William Kirby at Harvard his inception of two thousand and three, he oversaw the establishment in the entire program. He also took a bunch of

money from him. Drew Faust was the president of Harvard at University in two thousand and eight when Jeffrey was convicted of sex crimes. She made the decision that Harvard no longer could accept direct gifts from Epstein's following his conviction. So I think they went in a roundabout way to be able to give money to at least the program. Still, sure, there's all sorts of people that were like inherently involved.

There's a long list, like A. EO. Wilson is a prominent biologist and co author of Novak's work, and the controversial paper that they wrote was the Nature paper that argued standard natural selection theory was a simpler and more effective approach to understanding evolution of the I don't know how to say this word. It's euso. It's like ESO societal. It's a really weird word. That kin selection theory pretty much is what it is, and that's what this whole

program is based on. Is this theory, this kin selection theory too. And so it's it's interesting. There's a bunch of people. There's like listed forty people that were all involved throughout the years with this whole program, not including at the same time that this is happening, my boy church is going on as well. So there is multiple programs happening like literally side by side by side at

Harvard that he's funding tons of money into, no doubt. Now, I just want people to understand that one hundred percent with.

the connection to DARPA, Facebook and Jeffrey Epstein. Enter a man by the name of John Poindexter. Now I know that name. The name is the jokes, right themselves. I understand that, But who is John Poindexter laboratory? No, No, who is John Poindexter? And why the fuck am I bringing him up at this time? So he is a retired United States Naval officer and Department of Defense official. He was Deputy National Security Advisor and National Security Advisor

during the Reagan administration. He was convicted in April of nineteen ninety of multiple felonies as a result of his actions in the Iran contra affair. So he's as far as like being one of the government's boys, Like he absolutely is down to clown when it comes to doing some dirty shit on behalf of Uncle Sam. He's that guy. No doubts about this. But anyway, multiple felonies for that, but they were reversed on an appeal in nineteen ninety one.

Crazy how that works out. During the George W. Bush administration, he served a brief stint as the director of the DARPA Information Awareness Office. He is the father of a NASA astronaut and US Naval Captain, Alan G. Poindexter. Now, before I tell y'all the connection as far as as John Poindexter and all these things go, I feel like this is important. He served a brief stint as the director of the DARPA Information Awareness Office Ravenly have you ever heard of this?

right now? That's the Masonic logos, one hundred percent true.

the US national security by achieving total information awareness. It was achieved by creating enormous compew to database computer databases to gather and store the personal information of everyone in the United States, including personal emails, social networks, credit card reports, phone calls, medical records, and numerous other sources without any requirement.

and that's terroristic activity. Absolutely, absolutely so everybody can get arrested this point.

certain items that could possibly be listed as terroristic. And he said that he was doing this to find sleeper sell activities, right, because I mean, it doesn't take much information to learn that you can make some very sophisticated explosives with some very easily acquireable materials, right, And most of these things you could just buy online, or you could just go to your local hardware store and if you know what you're looking for, you can buy bolt

quantities and all these things. But if you're paying with cash and you're spacing out for a couple stores, whatever the case is. But they where he wanted to use Pallenteer to track people's spending to see which things would be a red flag, and he said that he was doing this to look for terrorists. And they use the

Patriot Act to justify these actions. To this day, the CIA says that the number one source of information that they use on American public comes from apps like Facebook, Instagram, Spotify, LinkedIn, PayPal, and now TikTok. The CIA openly admits this is it in like some sort of a crazy, underhanded secret.

They put up the letter for the week, they put up if there's gonna be any changes that are happening, they put up, the bus schedule they put up there. You know, if they have pbis, wearing special things. They put up all of this stuff on Facebook. They don't send letters home anymore like they used to. They used to print stuff out and then they would send it home, and now they don't do that, so they put it on the Facebook. So if you don't have Facebook, then

you're not connected to your kids' school exactly. Also same with sports. Now you can't just go to the websites. They have websites up, but you won't know when the registration is because they only put it on Facebook. Or if you're doing for example, like Marti gross stuff, you had like to find all the lists, you need to have a Facebook. So they've made it to where now we're reliant upon these things, yes, especially the transactional things.

Everyone's like, well, what's your LinkedIn profile? You know, you can't apply for jobs without this Lincoln profile or indeed or this or that or this, and also it h the financial thing is a whole big thing in and of itself. Hell, you can't even hardly pay rent unless you use Zell or mainly Zel but you know whatever, Zell, Venmo all this stuff. You can't buy goods, you can't go to farmer's markets. You know, they don't really take cash a lot of places anymore. So it's smart, it's

really ingenious. I'll give them that.

by anybody. Okay, now, remember we talked about that guy, I forget his name, Dan something, who was talking about how if you knew who owned crypto or who owned bitcoin, it would plummet.

to do this. It's not a hidden thing. So if they push forward, especially how England is like hell bent on pushing this into fruition but pretty much happening, then we know this is probably something we shouldn't be doing. And the fact that all these shitheads are the ones that invented it. Plus you know Fink is Elon's like home,

me home. I mean, they were just they were just sitting at the World Economic Forum joking around back and forth with each other about how much of what is I mean, it's not oh yeah, it's not even just that, but like they were just joking around with each other, like if people can't simply draw the connections themselves, Like I understand listening to people that are involved in conspiracy theories, you think they're crazy, but you could literally just look

at this you're self and really be like, you know, they sure all seem pretty chummy together. The money all seems to trail back and forth between each other. Epstein seems to be the center person of all of this. Maybe what they're pushing forward is not a positive thing for humanity.

I'll be real with y'all. I think we owe the conspiracy theorist in a Poulo because they were right about like everything, there's tons of not just comedians, not just TV personalities, all these things. They're like, Okay, you know, perhaps we should be listening to a whit conspiracy theories a little bit seriously, because like, yeah, no shit, sharelock. We've been saying it forever.

like reiterate this. We all know that Wayfair was selling children. Yeah, children that were taken, missing children that were taken, proven that they were. Wayfair never stopped selling Etsy proven to be selling children as paintings and has never let up once. Never, people have not stopped buying from Etsy. You're creating Etsy shops at all.

you're one of those Pizzagate believers. It's like Yeah, you're underplaying something very very serious the same way they underplayed wayfair. The common pizza joint, if I'm not mistaken, is still.

on all this time. That's what's the scary part, is what they've been working on and how successful they have been in the background while we have continued to be little worker bees and working and just trying to survive.

everything to spy on the American people. Four years Snowden blew the whistle on this and was ousted, and still to this day, the government will not allow him to come back home, even though like, oh, we'll totally take you back home. He's like, yeah, you can get fucked because I guarantee I'm going to be found dead somewhere. So let's read about that. Right, So, the NSA continues

to violate American's Internet privacy rights. This was written in twenty eighteen, but again, this all ties back to Epstein. All of this ties back to Epstein. Let's get into it here. So a federal court will be scrutinizing one of the National Security Agency's worst spying program on Monday. The case has the potential to restore crucial privacy protections for the millions of Americans who use the Internet to

communicate with friends, family, and others overseas. Yeah, Unfortunately that didn't happen, right because Edward Snowden was telling everybody about PRISM. The unconstitutional surveillance program at issue is called PRISM, under which the NSA, FBI, and CIA gather and search through Americans international emails, internet calls, and chats without obtaining a warrant.

When Edward Snowden blew the whistle on PRISM in twenty thirteen, the program included at least nine major Internet companies, including Facebook, Google, Apple, and Skype. So once again the connections. As far as how Facebook got started based off of a ADARPA program to spyle on the American people, this was proven in twenty thirteen. They were using PRISM to do it. Nobody paid attention, nobody cared. Today it is very likely that

includes an even broader set of companies. So the government insists that it uses this program to target foreigners, but that's only half the picture. In reality, it uses PRISM as a backdoor into americans private communications, violating the Fourth Amendment on a massive scale. We don't know the total number of Americans affected even today because the government has

refused to provide any estimate. This type of unjustifiable secrecy has also helped the program eve a public judicial review of its legality because the government also are excuse me, almost never tells the people that it's spied on them without a warrant. Indeed, the government has a track record of failing to tell Americans about this spying, even when the person in charged or is charged with a crime based on the surveillance. That's one reason why this case

is so important. This time the government has admitted to the spine and that's the thing, this absolutely thing. So we talked about this before too near us, just one parish over, there was a police officer, his wife was a teacher out of high school. They were doing horrible shit to children and they were making like he was coming into cupcake batter and his wife was making these cupcakes and bringing it to these kids and all this for years and years and years. There was pictures. There

was abuse that was happening to these kids. They were bringing home these high school girls and doing unspeakable shit to them. They also were producing child porn and distributing it. All this they were caught from spying from the Patriot Act. So like that is a case where this was absolutely being used for a good purpose. But that's the one in a million. The reality of it is that this was being done by the pedophilic elite to the American public, and every now and then they had to throw the

American public a bone. But even when they were under a being tried, they said that this was obtained through surveillance. They never actually admitted that it was through the Patriot Act, even though that's clearly what it was. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, but either way it goes. They just say that they found this on them, and here we go. They never expressly said that it was from government surveillance like that. They waited too, Yes they did, Yes, they waited.

forward with anything as well. So the surveillance, you can't because they have triggers in set set in to people looking up child porn, you get flagged. Yep, Like in the systems, you're being monitored. Everything is being monitored. You can't tell me that people are just happily watching child porn or creating it and then uploading it to the dark web, and they're not being flagged right away, like you're as soon as you even distribute though or watch

like intake it. You should be getting charged instead of just sitting on these people for months and months and months or years on end while you can see them abusing people, abusing children, and then like you're just building a stronger case. No, you should be one and done.

certain things. The problem is is there's no ethical boundaries when it comes to the Patriot Act. Who is enforcing enforcing ethics when there is no there no no one's check and balancing it. It's just we own this technology, We're gonna use it how we see fit. No one's holding any ethics to this. There's no framework when it comes to oh, you know, it's there's a loose framework, but no one is actually checking and balancing the government

and ensuring the safety and privatecy of the citizens. Because hell, most of the people don't even know that their shit's like it's like a long standing joke at this point, like, oh, if you talk next to your phone, your phone's gonna pick up your shit. Ha ha ha though, but it is real.

But like it's a long standing joke though now throughout America that we all know that is going to do this, but people keep continuing on and it's like, ah, you know, but again we're kind of like we kind of got our hands tied behind our back of what do we do? I think the question is, is trying to protect our future from becoming transhumanism and having transhumanism and allowing the more integration of AI. That's I think what people really should be focusing on when it comes to this.

seven oh two of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Relying on Section seven oh two, the government intercepts billions of international communications, including many sent or received by Americans, and it hunts through them in investigations that have nothing to do with national security. The Government of attempts to defend this spying by pointing out that it's quote unquote targets are foreigners located abroad, but this is no defense at all.

Americans regularly communicate with individuals overseas, and the government uses prison surveillance to collect and sift through many of these private communications. The government has even admitted that one of the purposes of section seven oh two is to spy on Americans international communications without a warrant. The government casts a wide net, making it easy for innocent Americans who communicate with family, friends, and other overseas to be swept up.

Relying on a single court order, The NSA uses section seven oh two to put more than one hundred and twenty five thousand targets under surveys each year. These individuals need not to need not be spies, terrorists, or accused of any wrongdoing. They can be journalists, business people, university researchers, or anyone else who may have information bearing remotely on foreign affairs. So, for instance, this helmet that I have

sitting behind me for Boohert. I got this from a Ukrainian armor smith before the rush of the Ukraine conflict took off. And if Igor, who's the guy who made this, if I was to order some more armor from him, there would be some sort of a communication between me and Igor. I would get flagged under section seven oh two, and the government would start monitoring me even more heavier than they already are.

So anyway, so where was I at here? So Snowden told us about this, right, he told us what was happening, but the extent wasn't fully understood until the Cambridge Analytica scandal of twenty eighteen. Ravenly, do you remember ever hearing about this?

data to British ad agencies. The data was collected through an app called quote This is Your Digital Life end Quote, developed by a data scientist, Alexander Cogan and his company Global Science Research in twenty thirteen. The app consisted of a series of questions to build psychological profiles on users and collected the personal data of the user's Facebook friends via Facebook Open graph platform. The app harvested the data

of up to eighty seven million Facebook profiles. Cambridge Analytica used the data to analytically assist the twenty sixteen presidential campaigns of Ted Cruz and Donald Trump. Cambridge Analytica was also widely accused of interfering with the Brexit referendum, although the official investigation recognized that the company was not involved quote beyond some initial inquiries and that quote no signs magnificant breaches took place, okay in interviews with The Guardian

in The New York Times. Information about the data misuse was disclosed in March of twenty eighteen by Christopher Wiley, a former Cambridge Analytica employee. In response, Facebook apologized for their role in the data harvesting, and their CEO, Mark Zuckerberg testified in April twenty eighteen in front of Congress. Y'all may remember that time frame when Zuck had to show up before Congress, and it was a whole thing.

The memes he was sitting on two cushions to make himself look taller, the way he was sipping water was very weird, and all of Congress, these old cats were like, so, mister Zuckerberg, if the WiFi is on, can the Facebook see my face? And He's like, uh, I'm sorry, what if my TV's on and my WiFi router one of them lies is blinking? Does the Facebook have access to my bank accounts?

foreign actors to influence elections. And you know, there was some varying levels of success with this, and some of this really amounted to nothing anyway, but this is definitely what took place. But anyway, in July twenty nineteen, it was announced that Facebook was to be fined five billion dollars by the Federal Trade Commission due to its privacy violations. That was it, That was the slap on the wrist was five billion dollars not to zuck to the company,

very important. In October twenty nineteen, Facebook agreed to pay five hundred thousand pounds to find to the UK Information Commissioner's Office for exposing the data of its users to a serious risk of harm. In May twenty eighteen, Cambridge Analytica filed for Chapter seven bankruptcy. Other advertising agencies have been implemented implementing various forms of psychological targeting for years, and Facebook had patented a similar technology in twenty twelve.

Let me say that one again. In twenty twelve, Facebook patented a form of psychological targeting. Okay, just so we're all on the same page and we all heard the same thing. Nevertheless, Cambridge Analytica's methods and their high profile clients, including the Trump presidential campaign and the UK's Leave EU campaign, brought the problems of the psychological targeting, and scholars have

been warning against to public awareness. The scandal sparked and increased public interest in privacy and social media influence on politic The online movement hashtag delete Facebook trended on Twitter. Shocker that it did such, and this is before it became x, So there we have it. Anyway, So basically, Cambridge Analytica paid large amounts of money for access to

a backdoor to Facebook that Zuck and Teal left. So Zuck and Teal when they created this entire website of Facebook, they left a series of backdoors that they hailed the keys to. And I don't mean this in the metaphorical sense. In the internet world and in the hacking world, a backdoor is how you gain access to a website's code, and certain things have a key. Now sometimes that is actually a hard key, like an actual thumb drive that unless you are somebody who has this thumb drive plugged in,

you're not getting access to this website. But there are hackers that are able to do very very impressive things with a little bit of time and determination whatever. But anyway, Cambridge Analytica paid huge sums of money to Mark Zuckerberg and to get access to this back door, and they did, and they used it against everybody. It gave the British company access to user data not just a Facebook, but of all of your friends, Facebooks, and very critically every

other app on your phone. This is this is a clincher, right the same way that Timu, for instance, anybody who has the Tu app, but anybody who has Temu downloaded on their phone, understand that the CCP is using a backdoor to gain entry into your phone. And they can use that back door to get access to every app on your phone, including your banking apps, your emails, your web browsers, your socials, your location, your camera, your microphone. They're able to do that through Timu, and that's also

been confirmed and understood to be a factual thing. This in a hypothetical conspiracy theory. Right to prove that point that they have access to do this, Cambridge Analytica was caught doing it in twenty eighteen through Facebook. So moving on. It's wild things, y'all, It really really is. So Cambridge Analytica was caught using this backdoor to influence elections in multiple countries mixed results, most notably Singapore their elections. Cambridge

Analytica actually swayed that pretty substantially. Believe it or not, but that's that's more of a talk for another day. Once they had fifty thousand data points on every single user, they sold it to the highs Bidder. So Cambridge Analytica is just using this to get data points. Now real quick, you might ask, what is a data point? This could be something very small and innocuous, or this could be something very large, for instance, your retinal scan or your

facial recognition. To lock your banking app, or to log into your password app, to get into all of your other shit, that's a data point, but so is every single thing that that unlocks. Also, you stopping at lunch at a certain restaurant could be a data point. What you order at that restaurant could be a data point. It's basically just a thing that the agency or whoever's looking into you would find of interest. That's essentially it.

Some of these are more serious than others, of course, but a data point isn't necessarily like, oh, this guy all he does is go to work and go home. There's nothing to see here, No, no, no, What YouTube channels does this guy subscribe to? What does this guy listen to and from work every day? What where does he work in what regard, all of these things are data points to collect a basically a dossier on you.

So once Cambridge Analytica collected fifty thousand data points from every single Facebook user, every single Facebook user, they sold that data to the highest bidder and were caught red.

people colluding on that election and swaying the vote. We could have that conversation for sure, what in Russia? What in Israel? It wasn't though it wasn't. It was a very select cabal of individuals who have been in cahoots doing this literally since two thousand and two, probably longer than that, but at least this particular group of shiittheads, we have a track record and a chain of custody that brings them back to two thousand and two. And once again, and I cannot stress this enough, it all

ties back to Jeffrey Epstein. And now that these files have been released and these emails are open source and all these things, and now we have a chain of custody and we have names and dates and places and things. It's all been verified. All the claims we've been making

have been validated. Without Jeffrey Epstein, the government would not have had the ability to spy on us in the way that they do, because Peter Teal wouldn't have had the contacts that he had, meaning Mark Zuckerberg wouldn't have had the contacts that he had, which means Pallenteer in

totality wouldn't have had the things that it had. All of the things, like I said, going down the list LinkedIn PayPal, Facebook, Instagram, Spotify, you name it, any tech startup that is quote unquote American over the last twenty years, all ties back to these.

came from. It is not a crazy concept to say that Jeffrey Epstein is the god fathing funder and one of the godfathing godfather founders of AI as we know it today, going back in time from the two thousand and two Common Sense Symposium that he hailed at his house in the Virgin Islands all the way to now where we have AI takeovers and all of these careers are being lost to AI in robotics and engineering and everything that Elon Musk is involved with, everything Peter Teel

is involved with. Y'all. Notice how AI is taking over, And I don't mean that in some sort of a silly turn of phrase way, legitimately taking over to a level to where the Terminator movies are looking like a real possibility here in the next five years.

about it. Like I don't enjoy technology stuff, I think there's some of it that's actually really fascinating and some of the AI. I will say this, I know that a lot of people are like you hate AI. I hate AI in the sense there's certain things of why I dislike AI. There is actual good technology when it comes to AI. I think the one that's really cool that I could see how it could turn nefarious, but I think as right now it's a cool one is the memory preserving one, because as looks so the memory

preserving one, and I'll actually play the video. I'll find a video for it so that way we can watch it. They take your memory and they reconstruct your memories using AI, being able to like pretty much put a slideshow together per se of like your life, so you don't forget all the things because if you notice, you only hold on to like certain moments, feelings, smells, you know, like glimpses. As you get older, you start to lose some of

your memories with when you're a child and stuff. Yeah, this can actually recreate them before you and be able to show you like a movie, which I think is kind of cool. To be honest, there's really there's some really good robotic things when it comes to surgery, where they're so technical that it's been very difficult for human

hands to be able to do specific surgeries. There is benefits to AI and robotics, but there is a lot more negatives when it comes to the advancements and what they actually want to do with it is where the true ethical concerns, at least for myself are.

children now are not doing research for projects anymore. Most schools are not even doing some sort of I remember a time when you, yeah, you would pull up Wikipedia, and we all know that Wikipedia is not that trustworthy of a source in all regards. Sometimes it is a legitimate, historical, documented thing and there's sites underneath it and all the stuff.

teachers started. Every time you turn something in, they would copy the whole thing, plug it into a plagiarism website and find what website that came from the teachers aren't even doing that anymore because these kids are turning in shit that's straight up AI, and the teachers are basically like, ah, well fuck it. Whatever AI is gonna be the way of the future anyway, I'd rather the kids learn how to use it than worry about it they're cheating or not.

And it's like, no, that's not the right fucking answer. You kunt, like, what are we talking about here? But that is what I mean. These kids and adults are relying on AI for all of their information, all of their research, all of their truth. That I have a very very deep problem with, especially when you learn that AI is wrong more often than it's right, and there's gonna be people that disagree with that statement. AI is right more often I'm sorry, that's incorrect. That is incorrect.

AI is giving you whatever the most Google searches tells it to give you. That doesn't mean that it is fact checked the data that it's presenting to you. And if you have a question about that type in anything that's politically objectively a little questionable, it's going to give you a certain side of the conversation, typically the incorrect side. Take the how you want it.

more and more and more. I was just as we've been talking, there was an article from last year of talking about how he's collecting kids from universities like fucking Pokemon cards, yeah, and making them drop out so once they get selected, they have to drop out of their programs, and it was a whole article about it, and like he's still living his best life out and about over two thousand times, as he mentioned in this, he's created, he did a literal killing machine that is being utilized

to be able to predict human ways and to help be more effective and efficient when it's coming to warfare just let alone everything else that he has his hands in, and how he's tracking all of your data all the time. And it was their brainchild to get these people together and to do this. And Epstein is actually praised in

an article. It's him on the front and it's his whole thing praising him that you can look up from two thousand and three praising Epstein about hosting this symporium and how amazing it was and how revolutionary this is to get everyone together and to really push forward and

create ideas and all this stuff. And then there's photos, tons and tons of photos of him at Harvard with all of these people having these deep in depth intellectual conversations of quote, you know, just thinking just whatever we're doing theology and blah blah blah. No, I think that

they're going over eugenic stuff. I think that they're talking about these programs and what else they can do and how they can make it moving forward, how they can make it more beneficial for people, and people want to actually take this and accept it.

mid two thousands. The a DARPA group came out with a computer program that was rigged up to a camera that was basically going to see an enemy combatant when it looked at and they programmed it to look at marines.

pick it up them. Two of them grabbed big ass boxes and like ran with boxes over them and you could even hear them giggling to themselves, laughing as they kept tripping and falling all over each other as they were running for one thousand meters past this camera, and it didn't pick up that this was like a ruse because it was still a developmental stage. Another one, another one cut down a little sapling and walked up quote moving like a tree for a thousand meters past this

camera to where it didn't pick it up. And it's like, brother, what do you mean you moved like a tree for a thousand meters? Showed me a tree that moves a thousand meters and it's like, look, it worked. Okay, it's only done if it daring the Lord of the rings, I guess.

his pedophile ring, his dirty blood money. Start to finish, there's no way around y'all. Yep So, anyway, while we wrap this episode up, I thought this was a wild one. I'm glad that I brought it up to the good cult members, but we want to hear what y'all think about it before I go ahead and give that send off.

I want to go ahead and give the send off that if you would like to get your start in the buying and selling and trading of gold and silver bullion, then go to the link of the description below to coecsilver dot com and get your start today. When you fill out your information, our homeboy Wayne Clark would be the one to reach out to you and get you

squared away. Listen, talk to your financial advisor, talk to your CPA whoever's handling your retirement, and ask them what they think about investing in precious gold and silver, precious metals and totality and let me know what they think. And once they tell you the truth of the matter, you'll want to get your hands on some because they're gonna tell you at least a portion of your retirement

portfolio needs to be invested in precious metals. While it is still affordable to get your hands on some silver golds over three thousand and ounce.

And if you use the promo code cult at checkout see ult, you'll get fifteen percent off of your order. And it's amazing. I promise you're not gonna regret the purchase. Let me think if there's anything else we need to plug raveingly you got anything on your in.

But hey, we want to hear from you. What do you think about it? The best place to let us know what be to please hit the five stars at the Shares of the Life suscribes to comments, Leo postly reviewers, shares with their friends and family, share us everywhere.

to Night. I am really and there's one very important, extremely vital piece of information we need to learn just as soon as humanly possible at all