Ep 969 - Big Ten Scheduling Reveal - podcast episode cover

Ep 969 - Big Ten Scheduling Reveal

Jun 08, 202335 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

We reconvene the podcast to talk through the Big Ten's schedule release for 2024 and 2025 in football. It's the end of the Big Ten East! It's also a schedule that rotates IU through the entire conference. We discuss IU's permanent rivalry, the "two-play", the 2024 and 2025 schedules, and how the rest of the conference's scheduling looks.

Transcript

You're listening to the back home network presented by home field. Apparel. Welcome back to Crimson Cask ale and clavius got Caulfield joining. You once again, it's been a while. We've gotten harassed by people online about the lack of content. It's summer folks, it's summer. We always take a step back. We appreciate your wanting new content.

This is going to be a rarity It cast that we're going to do here and we're only doing it because there's big news that we need to talk about, but Scott is on vacation. I'm going to be on vacation, it somewhere it was Scott's been on vacation, he's not there anymore. You know that we got it, we got to recharge the batteries, you know, podcasting about IU Sports. Can occasionally be exhausting, you know? So we gotta, we gotta take a step back every once in a while.

But Scott, you were out in Big Ten, country on your vacation, how was that? It's great. Yes, I was in LA. Everyone thinks of big ten country. I posted you and what did you do? A man on the street where you walked down like Hollywood Boulevard and ask them to like identify football players in the Big Ten did that go? Well, no, I'm sure if I did it, it wouldn't go. Well, I get have them. Give them logos a big tent. He's like a surprise for the logo of UCLA and feel like I

don't know. But I did I post this on our internal Discord on Instagram. Like, you know, I've been waiting 44 years, For IU to give you an invite to the Rose Bowl. They haven't done it. So, I went, and it was great. I mean, like it's, it's beautiful. I would love to see a game there. But how might we took the family down, took the picture front of the Rose Bowl. There's like tons of people, working out around it, some nice ladies like oh you must be from

the Midwest, I got something. They're taking a selfies of like being the Rose Bowl behind me but yeah I went to the Rose Bowl. I very much look forward to seeing a game there someday with. Not I eat. Well, Nate, you know babe I you versus UCLA? Yeah, at least a regular season

game, maybe nothing. Postseason but hey we can dream but know a lot of news to talk about today in terms of the future schedule for IU at least in football as the Big Ten announced earlier this week, that they have a new model by which they are doing things, we were quite skeptical of what that would look like and how I you would fare in it and actually it was better than we thought. So we're going to talk about that. We're going to talk about I use protected Rivals as well as.

Who they're going to be playing the next couple of years. So we're going to dig into all of that. First of all, before we do that, just a reminder that we are part of the back home network in the back home network is brought to you by home-field apparel, your place to go for the finest in college apparel the softest fabric, the coolest designs home-field apparel continuing to roll out new Collections.

And it's funny Scott because every time they roll one out, you know, it's like a nonzero chance that IU has a terrible football loss to that school at some point. History that happened. I think it was today or yesterday where they Unleashed a North Texas collection.

You know, and I always remember that, that trip to North Texas back in the early Kevin Wilson days where I you just look like completely off on member watching that game at Kilroy Sports because we were doing a postgame podcast there. That was that went about as well as you thought it would go, but no great, North Texas collection, and they've had some great collection releases some updates here throughout the course of the summer, use the code home.

Get 15% off your first order and it's well worth it. Every time I actually just picked up another hoodie because I needed another hoodie, it's got, as you know, didn't have enough, they had that new, Miami green hoodie, and then I have a lot of green Hood. He's out there. I was like, I got to pick that one up at the very least, so, and you figured after last year between the two basketball men and women who like we're bound to have a nice six-year run. We don't play Miami. Yeah.

Well you think? Yeah, I would, I would, I hope otherwise. What am I gonna do? At this point, you know? But but I also picked up a USB wall. The wall of hoodies, you cannot wear. I picked up a USC hoodie, and as I've learned, I'm not gonna be able to wear that one in 2025, so, but I think next year I'm fine anyway, let's dig in any way. Go to home field. Apparel.com, follow them on social media, follow them on Instagram and get on the newsletter distribution.

You get a chance ahead of time to see what's coming out. And sometimes there's some discount codes snuck in there, you never know. So anyway, let's dive I've into this. So the Big Ten announces today. I like how they didn't do it on a Friday, so it wasn't a news dump. Like they did it at like 4:00 in the afternoon on a Thursday. They announcing you three funny that they didn't, they didn't if it came out and announced like we're going back to leaders and legends, right?

It's like let it sit there for a second and I gotta screwing with you, I know, yeah, we need some like, dark comedy coming out of Big Ten front, office's, I think occasionally dark comedy that isn't, hey, we decided to just, you know, unilaterally change the Rules that everybody agreed upon at the beginning of the season, so I you you're not going to the yeah. Exactly, you know, so that that comedy, we could avoid.

But now the Big Ten. Everybody was wondering what was going to happen with the Big Ten in terms of scheduling, as obviously with, you know, 16 teams in the league divisions were becoming increasingly unreasonable, and unwieldy at least on the football side, and we didn't have divisions on the

basketball side. So, There were questions about how this was going to be done, we'd heard suggestions about a pod system but what they settled on was a series of protected opponents and then to play opponents which aren't really protected, but they're kind of temporarily protected. Iowa somehow gets three protected opponents, they're playing. I was like, you're just going to take all the protected. T like how does that?

Although I'm constantly baffled at why this conference bends over backwards for Iowa of all teams, of all programs. Its I mean, not that Iowa doesn't deserve some consideration but they get Minnesota. Nebraska, Wisconsin, every year at least for the next couple of years and I guess beyond that. But anyway, for Indiana and oddly and oddly, Illinois. And Purdue is a protected area, which I never what I think of Big Ten, you know, rivalries, that that was never top of my list.

So how Purdue Lux into, like, they got a horseshoe to? Because we gotta we gotta keep another bad opponent, our schedule every year. But I mean, I will say in the Deanna only one protected opponent and it's Purdue, they do get a kind of a quasi protection on the Michigan State series, at least for the first two years where they will play Michigan State, both home and away. And then they get, Maryland, both home and away in 24 and 25, which thank you. I appreciate that.

Even though Maryland's good Maryland's, beatable as Indiana has proven at times, whereas, the games Indiana has been playing consistently against Ohio state every year, Michigan every year Penn State every year, we didn't To see that again, and we didn't in this. And so, honestly, Scott, I feel like I'm in a bush and played Northwestern and five years. We really, we have a real long history cap. I will think like to play opponent.

You need a better name for it. Like, you know, it sounds like it sounds like, it sounds like one of those games that you used to play on espn.com back in the dial-up era you know. But you can win the free sneaker phone if you like if you're really good at to play. Yeah.

But No. But I mean, all told I think, IU has to feel really good about the situation that they're in right now as they were able to avoid getting locked into playing Ohio State. They were avoiding, you know, they avoid getting locked into play. Michigan, they avoid getting locked into play Penn State and that was really what we've been complaining about for, you know, essentially the last 10 years is this idea that I you was constantly being essentially offered up as a sacrificial lamb

again. Programs that were so far ahead of them now. It doesn't mean they're not going to play those teams. It just means they're not going to play them every year. And instead what Indiana gets is a setup that is a bit more friendly in that. There's a chance going into every scheduling season that you're going to have, you know, potentially winnable games as opposed to just crossing three of them off immediately and saying, well, we probably aren't going to be competitive in.

Those know, I'm just a big 10 Our Graphics Department like they have this, you know, the 2024 ponens 2025, and it's like they have the team's right underneath the name of Indiana in white. But those are the away games. It's a weird setup of how they're doing. It is odd. Yes, looking at it know, what's great 2024. We don't play Michigan and we don't play Ohio State. Our home schedule in 2024 is Maryland. Minnesota Penn State, Purdue and UCLA. That's all things told, that's

really good. I mean, this is where, you know, it's like we have complained about the Michigan, Ohio. Eat Penn State triumvirate every year. It's always funny. You know, I say it all the time. When I people, I know up here who are Purdue fans, they're like, oh my God. Next year, we got to play Michigan and Ohio State. It's like, okay.

And we do that every year ago, we had Penn State like, so we don't get that it's nice, but it's also like, you are in the Big Ten. There's going to be some tough games. It also is funny that in 2025 as this goes out, like there is one list lat, you know, we do play Ohio State Michigan again, it's like a big ten saying, like just before we change things up like we're gonna Kick Indiana in the

pants one more time. Speaking of Purdue, they somehow don't get Ohio State or Michigan in 2024, but they do get Ohio State in 2025 a some are they do get a high state of Michigan in 2025. So they get to taste the pain for a year, which is nice. But no all things told this, all this shake-up benefits Indiana in a very good way. The divisions, the way they were set up, we're just particularly bad for Indiana because you're in a spot.

Are, you know, we had that, you know, God, it's like turning into. Like, I don't want to rehash the covid here anymore, but it's like, it's almost like the night. Fiery thing is don't want to get into the covid thing and how that fits in.

But it's like, that was kind of an abnormal, for the most part year, but every year in you're in, you're out, you're just, you're at a disadvantage to Michigan, Ohio, State and Penn State. You should be similar to Michigan State. Although, it's not totally the case, although we've been kind of 500 within the last couple years, but it's kind of like, you were just Battling with Maryland, Michigan State and Rutgers for like who's going to

stay on the bottom of the division who's going to finish fourth? And that's kind of the lot in life. You were going to have you might be able to break out here and there it was just not good. For those four teams, Indiana being one of them.

As you said that the biggest fear and a shake of here is like if they would have somehow locked us into like three divisions and suddenly we were in a division with like Penn State Michigan, Ohio State again like just the four teams like that in Indiana. It's like I do this really now we're just going to flog The rest of time, this all things on

the table. This seems like a really good option for a team like Indiana. It's certainly better than the current situation is and what Indiana's faced.

I mean, ultimately, you know, I think I've said this on the podcast multiple times before and I'll say it again, like I think to some degree, the schedule has been a an excuse for IU because yes, obviously it's been problematic that Has had to play those teams every year, on the flip side, other teams in the conference have figured out how to beat Michigan. They figured out how to beat Ohio, State and Indiana. I don't think deserves much

credit for having not figured out how to beat Michigan and Ohio State. I dive an updated the spreadsheet and a few years. But, you know, for a while there up until Indiana beat them in 2020 IU was the only school that hadn't beaten Michigan from 1987 to 2019. And, you know, you look at State. The only teams that haven't beaten them since 1989.

Have been Indiana, Maryland and Rutgers like you know Minnesota figured out how to do it. Nebraska figured out how to do it. Northwestern figured out how to do it. And so you know certainly it didn't help to have to play those teams every year but I also don't think that this is some kind of magic wand that's going to suddenly make Indiana a more competitive football program. It just means that there will be less guaranteed losses at the start of the season.

They Still lose the games but you know, but it is positive and I think ultimately not just for Indiana but for Maryland in Rutgers as well. This is a welcome change and honestly well from this perspective I mean Marilyn and Runners look at something else. Yeah. But you know and and and also I think even Penn State you know I think Penn State's a little bit. Their wit's weird because Penn State was not given any permanent rivals in the looking at. I didn't fully I saw that.

So that's the face. I was making. Yeah. Like you think Penn State is like, I know this is all released in the Press is out. Like, I only got three. Like, just, just to show you guys not like Iowa. I know we're relatively new but like there's, you know, Rutgers is newer like USC. Like can we get 1? Like we just take one of Iowa's. Yeah, I'm do we get any? Well I am part of this conference and that's why I am somewhat surprised.

When you look at this that Marilyn or that like that there was no no I was thinking more of that Penn State would get like Maryland or Rutgers is a permanent rival, a local game against a team that's clearly a Are below them. But, you know, the, the overall ones that they decided to protect, I mean, clearly, like Michigan was going to get Michigan. Instead, estate in Ohio state, that one, that one makes a lot of sense, USC and UCLA.

We're going to get each other. You know, it's not surprising that. I like Maryland and Rutgers got each other because of their geology graphic proximity, but I do feel kind of as I look at this, that this is going to be something that they tweaked in the future. I also think to some degree Green. Maybe they didn't put no gets for her. I will get higher gets five. Yeah, our sketch, I can detect exactly. But no, I have a sneaking suspicion. The way they did this.

That they're there, at least keeping it open in the back of their minds that, you know, we might have to change this up for 2026 anyway, because we might have a couple of new teams that were welcoming to the conference. So, like why, why can't what? Yeah, so get away. Good no, I was just saying that that was the other thought that I had a kind of a big picture way, is this? This feels I like the way they're setting this up, but this definitely feels very flexible.

And then, if they decide to add two to four more teams, it even in 2024 or 2025 at 21.5 too soon. But like if they announce to add something new, like this doesn't

feel like this is set in stone. This feels very much and we could add a team in 2025 and you could very easily just kind of re-engineer this on the Fly versus had they done like you know three different divisions, where you kind of need time to cycle that through this feels this As I look through it and thought about it, this feels very much like a we know we have some other teams on the radar that we're going to bring into the Big Ten but we also know we have to answer the question of

what are we doing with our schedule today so this kind of answers it in. This is flexible enough that if we decide to add, you know, just you know Arizona and Stanford in two weeks. Yeah. You can easily swap them in here. You look at the the schedule for 2024, for Indiana, I'll will have to obtain a hoary on This this might be the easiest football schedule Indiana's ever had in the Big Ten.

And I mean, if you look at it night, the your home games are, Maryland, Minnesota Penn State, Purdue UCLA. I mean, honestly, all five of those might be winnable games. Even if you want to take Penn State out of it, the other four will be winnable and then you got your road games or Michigan State, Nebraska, Northwestern and Wisconsin. I mean Indiana's, one at all of those stadiums. Weirdly except Jordan within the last decade, you know.

So I do think that that certainly less daunting than what you might see otherwise but so we go, we go yeah. Four and eight that year and well gets an extension based off of that or five and seven. It's hard to say that's Alan's extension here, right? Yeah. Well, that will be most likely. That will be, that is the position Vector after the 24 season is when the buyout drops, let's just put it that way. So we'll see what happens with

All of that. But then 2025 is an incredibly difficult schedule Indiana's home games that year, Iowa, Michigan. Michigan, State and Rutgers and then their Road games are Illinois. Maryland, Ohio, State Purdue and USC, which at that point? I'm assuming USC is on Full Throttle. Ranked 5 in the country. Probably, yes. Yeah, but it's, you know, it's all told I'm curious to see how this itinerate sin future schedules, but I will say from an IU. Active.

They do not feel terribly hard done by in this particular setup and and look, it's the Big Ten and you're gonna have a lot of good football brands in here and, you know, to some degree, I guess Scott, I don't mind getting, you know, if you're going to incur losses incurring, losses, because you're traveling to USC or you're traveling, you know, other places is not as bad as Incurring the same losses against the same teams over and over and over again, which is essentially at what it felt

like, for Indiana, for quite a while. But, you know across the conference, you know, I do think that the, you know, with a 9 game scheduled that the league did a pretty good job of figuring out how to balance some of this stuff. You know. I haven't looked at it Piper closely in terms of like each individual teams expected schedule.

But it does do, I think what they've tried to do and and honestly but I think a lot of leagues are struggling to get their heads wrapped around in the mega League era, which is give everybody a taste of playing everybody else relatively regularly without getting so locked in to a divisional format that frankly I think it outlived its usefulness and also as we've seen and build kindly pointed this out in an ESPN piece had kept the Big Ten from actually having its two

best teams matchup in the conference Championship game because it was so Strictly based on divisional format and so I am happy to see all of that. And you said something in there that got really tiring as an IU fan, I'm sure as like, I would sure it'd be a safer at Ohio, State fan on the other side of the coin, it got tiring in the divisions that just you plate. I think, I know, it's kind of an oh, shit moment, but it's like, you play the same teams over and over again.

It got kind of tiring like, all right. Well, let's go lose Ohio State. Again, like this, we do this every year. It's like Groundhog Day and it becomes. Like the Maryland, Rucker games become the tube, Biggest games of the year. It's like, it never changes by the fact that like, it took us eight years to play Nebraska, like to Braska, was in the league forever. We never played him.

I look at this and it's like, wow, we're playing like Northwestern. And we're playing, you know, USC, and we're getting Illinois mixed in there like, it it just feels like we're playing more of the Big Ten and I'm sure again, from Ohio, State's protected. They probably got tired. Like, we gotta kick the shit out of Indiana again. Like we do this every year, like they just get tight. It's just it felt very Mind and it didn't feel like you were

part of a larger conference. I think it's interesting, just kind of looking at, you know, who UCLA and USC gets their first two years as home games just because they're Marquee teams coming in. And you definitely see like, you know, UCLA is hosting Ohio State in year, one and then USC's going to Ohio State and Year too.

So they're getting Ohio State, both of them, you know, UCLA is getting It's our USC gets Michigan in year in 2024 and then, you know, oddly, they get they get Penn State and year 2 and UCLA gets Wisconsin. So it is, it's a nice balance. I mean, you know, it's a nice mix, you know, I mean, UCLA fans can say, oh great, we get USC at home, we get Ohio State at home. And, you know, hopefully they just ignored that they're going to be watching like Northwestern and Minnesota coming to play

them and USC. They don't get, you know, the sexy pic of you. Of Ohio State, but they get Michigan coming in and playing them and that's really cool. I mean, I am excited to see these Big Ten teams finally playing both in the Rose Bowl and in the Coliseum not in the bowl season. You know, I think that's going to be really fascinating to see how everybody matches up. What is a team who didn't play Nebraska for eight years? It's kind of cool that we get to play both of them.

The first two years one you UCLA at home and then 1 USC on the road. I'm trying to do it in my head. Now in the First two years, does Indiana play everybody in the Big 10. I believe there's one team that's missing, but I have to go through and look, I haven't, I haven't actually tracked it all down myself. I could, you could be right. They may end up playing everybody but again. Yeah, I think it's got Iowa. I was the hardest one because they have, you know, 75

protected protected games. Yeah, that's true. Yeah, we have to wait till 2025. We get Iowa at home. I don't know if I don't know if they are, they protecting? The home games as well. Do they like, what? We can't play anybody on the road? We couldn't possibly were Iowa and also quietly Akron state is accurate, is also part of the Big Ten just for Iowa, right? Just for Iowa's purposes. I'm looking through, I think I think we play everybody. Yeah, yeah, going through it.

Every every team just got to see Rutgers Rutgers is Rutgers and 25 at home. What would be interesting? Yeah, I you at least plays everybody in the Big Ten in 20 either in 2024 and 2020. Five, which is cool. I'd be curious to know if every team is in the same boat or if there are there's got to be some voids here or there but that's you know, give it up for the Big Ten again for a team in Indiana.

That's been you know it's been years since we played Illinois, we feel free to play in the North or South Northwestern much. We can play Nebraska for a while. It's nice that we're going to get see everybody in a two-year span. So, they haven't announced what tiebreaking procedures will be, and I do think I'm not just to be clear. Now, Ohio state with not worried about ending at the first, but the bright. The first Iraq is Ohio, State

wins. And, and I'm also not particularly worried about Indiana, being in these tie Breakers in the near future. But I will be interested because you're gonna have a situations where there's two undefeated teams that didn't play each other and how they decide to go about breaking that kind of a tie is going to be really fascinating but you know, they're look. The entry of the interesting thing.

If you look at the, the press release from the Big Ten, the the four bullets, the kind of guiding constructs that they used for. This were maintaining control and flexibility as the college football postseason format evolves with the goal to create access for programs into an expanded college football playoff. I'm glad to see them actually publicly acknowledging that balance of annual Travel by distance regard regions of the conference and time zones, balance of historic.

And recent competitive Trends and then balance. And maximization of Television inventory, it is going to be interesting to see. Like, how many of these I you games actually end up on National Television versus? How many of them are on peacock every year? That's, that is the, that is a question that, you know, I do think in the Anna's going to get some opportunities, you know, especially with with big teams coming to Bloomington.

I am curious to see like this. Does you see Ela Indiana, get a decent spot on television somewhere, probably, not just Penn State, you know, at Indiana, get one. Perhaps it does. Does Indiana at USC, get one.

I don't know. I think this is where the inventory thing is going to be really fascinating because clearly, there are going to be tears of inventory, where, you know, your how good you're doing and how well, you're competing is going to factor directly into how much you're seeing and on what particular annals. So right now, you know, I feel like Indiana is unfortunately kind of in the peacock tier with a lot of how it's played the last couple of years.

But on the flip side of it, I think of Indiana can be competitive this season. Especially maybe they put themselves in a better inventory, format to better showcase the program in future years. That's going to be a really curious thing to watch. Just watching how the Big Ten and it's television Partners, decide they're going to manage these things. As you mentioned peacock, it makes me think back to Indy car like maybe a little blackout the games.

Maybe it'll break out peacocks of, people can't watch him in those in those areas. No, I think you're right, you know, but even as Indiana's been bad, it feels like we were always getting a lot of, you know, new tspn games. I think, you know, there's going to be there. Probably still going to have the Friday night games. That will be a game that we won't be part of it.

Like this. I think there's gonna be enough inventory of Sunday Saturday night games, Friday night games, that are going to feature the The Good, the good team. So to speak that will probably have a couple. But you know that's that's the least of my worries.

That's something where I feel like the Big Ten has been pretty good and flexible about you know as you get better even with in season they promote you pretty well, if that's pretty much you, you earn those rights and honestly Indiana hasn't earned any of those rights except for it feels like somehow we always earn starting the season playing Ohio State, like so good.

It's nice that, you know, I hope that in 20, whatever year it is, you know, the year we have Ohio, They in 2025 I hope we don't open the season with Ohio State again but yeah I hear you on that. I think that's just something where you we have to earn those. Those note or spotted, it's gonna be, but it's going to be harder.

Because every week if you have a USC, Ohio State game, that's going to be their Michigan's going to be there, it's like, it's as a conference gets bigger, it's harder to get, you know, a light on yourself. Hi, I'm gonna, I'm gonna tap out on this conversation with this Scott. Okay, so Indiana's with their protected rival and Then there to play. They've got Purdue, Maryland, Michigan State, Purdue with their protected rival into play has Indiana Northwestern and Illinois.

Who got the better deal? given given what we know right now about what the next couple of years of the Big Ten are going to be That's a great question on the surface I would say Purdue got the better deal that said, and I think I've talked about this in previous podcasts. You go back and look at the last like nine years US versus Michigan State. We're I think we're either even or we have a one-game lead on them like, and the years that we've been good. We've been better than Michigan

state has been. Like we've obviously been, well, except for the They watch the college-football playoff. But yes, I think if you start the year after, he struck the Earth, which is like simple, but that's like nine year eight years ago. It's eight or nine years ago. Mike go on. Hey I set the rules wherever I want, but like there haven't been a lot of we've been very similar to Michigan State. I think we're better than Maryland and then Purdue obviously you know, they're

going to be there. I think it's very close. So I thought I would honestly take either one of those. I think probably a slight Edge to Purdue for what they got, but I Either one of those are pretty good. As I look around, I want to answer your question and I'll also ask you this is there. If you could just take any other teams, you know, protected and to play opponents, is there anybody else's group you'd like to have as opposed to Indiana?

Well, let me let me answer my own question first on this and then I'll get to that one. I actually kind of like, Maryland Michigan State Purdue slightly better going into the next few years because I think Michigan State might be in real trouble from Iraq. Perspective. And from a program perspective, where's Illinois does feel like it's kind of on the come up right now with Bret Bielema as their coach Northwestern and Maryland.

I mean, I Maryland's better than Northwestern and might be for the foreseeable future, but I don't know if northwestern's completely crashes a program then then yes, Purdue got the better end of the deal here but if Northwestern can fight back to like, 500 level respectability, perhaps, perhaps, it's actually Indiana, I mean, looking at the rest of the The collections here. I don't know that. I would, well, I gotta say. I don't know.

I mean, I'm looking at it. I mean, if if Indiana didn't have such a terrible history against Wisconsin, I would probably vote for Iowa's Trio of Minnesota, Nebraska, Wisconsin, but beyond that, no, I actually really like what Indiana's got in front of them as far as their lineup is concerned. But I think Purdue's is probably the easiest over all of the group's. Yep, and I agree with you.

I was looking through it's like well you kind of start looking like our who doesn't have Michigan, who doesn't have a house. Take a guess at Penn Doesn't Wisconsin. It, it trims down pretty quickly I'm with you. I like Iowa's. But Wisconsin is like a guaranteed loss for us every year. Yeah. All told to me, the takeaway is I with you. This isn't a magic wand, this doesn't suddenly mean we're a bowl team, because there's more teams, there's more wins.

You got to get in conference, but I think this gives us a better path to success. Now, you got to do it and we need a quarterback to do that. Well, among other things. Yes. But now I think well that's another story for another day, but Ultimately, the big story here. The Big 10 East is dead. And may, it lie in disgrace somewhere for the rest of time, you know, after this upcoming season, no more Big 10 East and that's that's the headline news for IU fans.

That's the most exciting aspect of the Soul. Yep. And I think this open real quick just an end to 5 minutes here. I do think this opens up. I think this is kind of a quiet telling that the Big Ten is open for business for other teams because they didn't set things in stone. There, weren't divisions there. There wasn't something that's going to be really hard to unwrap her. Add teams to that's the way I read it. Two part question for you.

Do you agree with me and then just for fun, if the big Ten's going to add teams, where do you think they add? Eames or What teams do you think they add? Wow, I mean, there's so many moving parts right now. It's, you know, I still think that it's, it's more likely.

If the Big Ten were to add, something it would be as a result of the ACC, starting to Splinter as opposed to the Pac-12, starting to Splinter. But if the Pac-12 does Splinter, I do think the Big Ten will be open for business there and we'll just kind of take what they can get. I think the preference would be to go in a different direction. Direction. You know, there's some

interesting news about all that. I mean University of Miami is now part of the AAU, not the not the not, the high school basketball association, but the American Association of American universities, which is kind of seen as a prerequisite for getting in to the Big Ten, you know? And that's that might factor into things. You've got all of this back and forth as far as what's going on with ACC grant of rights. But ultimately, the end of the day, I think. What is really going to factor

in more than anything else? Is what the big 12 ends up doing and what they're able to pull off, if they really go and get a couple of teams out of the Pac-12 of Colorado defects. If Arizona defects suddenly I think you know, Oregon and Washington are wet right back on the table. And that if you think about it, now you've got a perfect setup where each of those three each of those four teams on the west coast. Suddenly have a protected rivalry with each. Other.

And now that solves a lot of travel problems that might not have been there, otherwise. And so, that's that to me, is probably still the most likely scenario. Although I know a lot of big, ten presidents, and leaders probably would prefer to be looking the other direction, geographically at things. Yeah, I mean, I don't, I'm not as tightly plugged in as you are.

I just, I look at this as your kind of down to a, it's a battle between the SEC and the Big 10 and while it isn't totally, this way, it does feel like the SEC has been making moves. The Big Ten has been, I don't say reacting, but that's just, you know, the, the SEC gets Texas and Oklahoma and the Big Ten gets USC and USC, it would, it would be nice in this kind of war and Tit for Tat for the Big Ten to make a proactive move.

And, you know, go out and get those four teams you mentioned Suddenly It's like, all right balls in your court SEC, like it just it. I would love to see the Big Ten. Get aggressive versus if the SEC goes and grabs two schools, then

it's like, all right. The Big Ten again it doesn't I think that the USC UCLA was a very measured move and a lot of logic to it but it and so I don't want to say it's reactive but it's just it it would be nice to see the Big Ten kind of be proactive and put the SEC on their heels. I don't know. I mean I hear where you're coming from but I also think that they're playing two different games right now and we're not both models can work.

I mean the Big Ten is pursuing an NFL style model and the SEC is pursuing a Different kind of model one. That's a little more regionally cell in an SEC type model. Well, it's it it well, but it's not even if you thinking about more professional comparisons. It is. It is just a different kind of setup than what you are seeing. The Big Ten do and we'll see you. I mean, I think they're both going to be successful.

You're just talking about measures of success at this point, but yeah, I'm gonna be fascinating anyway, Scott, this was fun. We'll talk about this, some more as more comes out and I will see you and everybody else in the audience. At the LA Coliseum sometime in 2025 when Indiana is taking on Southern California. I mean, by the way, I'm yeah. Thatthat sounds like a fun trip.

I'm in depth but let's go. I mean, it's that's more just to see the Coliseum. That's not to really see a competitive football game, you never know. I I have a sneaking suspicion of these Pac-12 schools aren't really that good which has been borne out with most competitive items the last several years. But yeah. Anyway like in Riley and USC, I I think they're going to be on a path a little bit different than I you.

Yeah, we'll see. We've heard that from several other coaches or about several other coaches out there before it's tough to win in the modern game of football. When you just don't have the same level of recruiting base that you used to have out there, but that's going to be the fascinating part. So anyway, I great. We won. We won one big 10 game in two years. Yeah, I agree. It's tough to win, I'm never mind.

Anyway, all right. Well, I know you're talking about, you will wrap it up. So for Scott, I'm Galen. Thanks for joining us here on Crimson Castle. Cast as we will bring you more news events warrant and we'll see what happens with the scheduling as we move forward. Thanks to all you folks for joining us. Thanks to our presenting sponsor home field apparel and thanks to our friends. At the back home network will catch you folks on the flip side. Bring back the Bison. So long, everybody.

Cast as we will bring you more news events warrant and we'll see what happens with the scheduling as we move forward. Thanks to all you folks for joining us. Thanks to our presenting sponsor home field apparel and thanks to our friends. At the back home network will catch you folks on the flip side. Bring back the Bison. So long, everybody.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android